Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 6

Sims-Fayola International Academy 2013 Student Data Summary

Overall Reading Notes: 1. ELL students growth in Reading was greater than the state average and equal to the district average. 2. Proficiency rate increase from last years TCAP for our 6th grade___11%____, 9th grade____17%_______. Overall Math Notes: 1. Proficiency rate increase from last years TCAP for our 6th grade___-4%____, 9th grade____0%_______.

! TCAP Performance (Achievement Measures) !

Overall Writing Notes: 1. 3rd highest growth scores in the FNE region! 2. Beat the state and district average for minority growth rates. 3. Equal the district and beat the state average for ELL student growth. 4. Beat the state and equal the district growth rates for boys. 5. Proficiency rate increase from last years TCAP for our 6th grade___3%____, 9th grade___16%________.

Grade Specific Performance 9th Reading: Proficient: 27% Growth Percentile: 70th (beat growth percentile goal by 20 percentile points) Math: Proficient: 8% Growth Percentile: 61st (beat growth percentile goal by 11 percentile points) Writing: Proficient: 16% Growth Percentile: 73rd (beat growth percentile goal by 23 percentile points)

6th Reading Proficient: 40% Growth Percentile: 30th (missed growth percentile goal by 20 percentile points) Math Proficient: 24% Growth Percentile: 26th (missed growth percentile goal by 24 percentile points) Writing Proficient: 22% Growth Percentile 30th (missed growth percentile goal by 20 percentile points)

Note- There was tremendous growth in the 9th grade. The percentile growth average for all tested areas is 68th percentile. This exceeds the district goal by 18 percentile points. Also note that the proficiency percents in the 6th grade are higher because they came in a better academic position than 9th graders. Once we get the data from

! !

DPS, we will be able to show the proficiency percentage improvements. The growth there was below our internal goals of 50th percentile.

NWEA Map (Growth Measures)

MAP DATA: (6th Grade Reading)


Fall Winter Spring

Percent Below Grade Level Percent At or Above Grade Level Percentile Average Percent Met RIT Target Percent Grew 1.5 Years or More Percent Grew 1.5 Years or More (SPED) Percent Grew 1.5 Years or More (ELL)

77.05% 22.95% 27% n/a n/a n/a n/a

68.25% 31.75% 32% 41.94% 29.51% 20.00% 15.00%

61.10% 38.90% 39% 76.19% 68.25% 60% 60%

MAP DATA: (6th Grade Language Usage)


Fall Winter Spring

Percent Below Grade Level Percent At or Above Grade Level Percentile Average Percent Met RIT Target Percent Grew 1.5 Years or More Percent Grew 1.5 Years or More (SPED) Percent Grew 1.5 Years or More (ELL)

81.97% 18.03% 23% n/a n/a n/a n/a

78.12% 21.88% 29.97% 44.26% 29.51% 20% 25%

72% 28% 32.10% 75.00% 59.38% 60% 50%

MAP DATA: (6th Grade Mathematics)


Fall Winter Spring

Percent Below Grade Level Percent At or Above Grade Level

85.25% 14.75%

78.69% 21.31%

79.42% 20.58%

Percentile Average Percent Met RIT Target Percent Grew 1.5 Years or More Percent Grew 1.5 Years or More (SPED) Percent Grew 1.5 Years or More (ELL) n/a n/a n/a n/a

23%

30.32% 39.68% 19.05% 10% 20.00%

27.84% 50.00% 42.19% 20% 40%

MAP DATA: (9th Grade Reading)


Fall Winter Spring

Percent Below Grade Level Percent At or Above Grade Level Percentile Average Percent Met RIT Target Percent Grew 1.5 Years or More Percent Grew 1.5 Years or More (SPED) Percent Grew 1.5 Years or More (ELL)

81.82% 18.18% 28% n/a n/a n/a n/a

63.64% 36.36% 36% 50% 37.50% 50.00% 46.15%

54.55% 45.45% 46.00% 87.88% 78.78% 100.00% 76.92%

MAP DATA: (9th Grade Language Usage)


Fall Winter Spring

Percent Below Grade Level Percent At or Above Grade Level Percentile Average Percent Met RIT Target Percent Grew 1.5 Years or More Percent Grew 1.5 Years or More (SPED) Percent Grew 1.5 Years or More (ELL)

87.50% 12.50% 21% n/a n/a n/a n/a

72.73% 27.27% 28.53% 43.75 40.65% 16.66% 30.77%

69.70% 30.30% 37.71% 72.72% 75.75% 83.33% 69.23%

MAP DATA: (9th Grade Mathematics)


Fall Winter Spring

Percent Below Grade Level Percent At or Above Grade Level Percentile Average Percent Met RIT Target Percent Grew 1.5 Years or More Percent Grew 1.5 Years or More (SPED)

86.67% 13.33% 22% n/a n/a n/a n/a

87.50% 12.50% 26.45% 20.68% 34.48% 33.33% 15.38%

85.29% 14.71% 28.34% 65.62% 31.25% 100.00% 53.84%

! ! !

Percent Grew 1.5 Years or More (ELL)

Note- Our growth goals were 10% Green= grew more than 10% Blue= grew more than 5%, but less than 10% Red= grew less than 5%

How Are We Doing With Catch Up & Keep Up Growth? Math Reading Writing

6th Grade Low Typical High 53% 32% 15% 50% 29% 21% 50% 25% 25%

9th Grade Low Typical 33% 21% 46% 29% 17% 54% 8% 28% 64%

! ! !

High

How Are We Doing Against Our DPS Contracted Goals?

Goal

Our Performance

Minimum 50th Percentile Growth in Reading, Writing, & Math for 6th grade Minimum 50th Percentile Growth in Reading, Writing, & Math for 9th grade 75% of continually enrolled students will meet RIT goals on NWEA Map 75% of all subgroups will meet their annual growth targets on NWEA Map

Reading: 30th Percentile Writing: 30th Percentile Math: 26th Percentile Reading: 70th Percentile Writing: 73rd Percentile Math: 61st Percentile 6th: 67% 9th: 75% 6th ELL: 50% (grew from 20%) 6th SPED: 47 % (grew from 17%) 9th: ELL: 67% (grew from 31%) 9th SPED: 94% (grew from 33%) 6th: (61%) 9th: (64%) 6th: (56%) 9th: (95%) 6th: (22%) 9th: (40%)

Minimum growth of 50th percentile for students 2 or more years behind in Reading Minimum of 2 years growth or more on NWEA Map for students 2 or more years behind in Reading Minimum growth of 65th percentile for students who are on grade level in Reading.

Minimum of 1.5 years growth or more on 6th: (64%) NWEA Map for students who are on grade 9th: (40%) level in Reading

Sims-Fayola International Academy 2013 Organizational and Financial Summary

! !

Goal Student enrollment will be at least 85% of goal

Our Performance 213 as of 8/21/13 102% of 209 (funding goal) 90% of 236 (DPS Projections) 85% of 250 (20% Attrition assumption)

95% of students completing school year will re-enroll Total unrestricted net assets will exceed Tabor Requirements 100% of teachers HQ have status

97% re-enrollment rate Surplus of $13,688.24 in unrestricted funds at year end financials 92% of teachers are HQ (11/12) * Science teacher (middle school)

All BOD will complete CBE modules with 5 of 7 complete. 3 new board members 6 months of membership were just selected. The total number of board members is now 10. 85% of parents highly satisfied with school. Successful Audit Middle School: Approaching High School: Exceeds Mid-September report will be ready. Due to DPS September 25th.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi