Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Hello Everybody !
Today, I have the great privilege to interview Laurence Hart, Senior Manager/Information
Management Solution Lead at Washington Consulting, Documentum Expert, blogger of
www.wordofpie.com, ECM philosopher and twitter junkie.
Hello Laurence !
First of all as usual, let me thank you for the time you take to share your knowledge
about ECM.
So Laurence, where content management experience has begun for you ? What was
your first CM project and which solutions did you take?
Coincidently enough, I recently wrote about this very topic on my blog. My first system was a
correspondence tracking system for the U.S. Air Force. I was brought onto the project as the
database expert and was tossed the content management piece. It was DOCS Open from PC
DOCS (later acquired by Hummingbird and then Open Text). We used a custom interface, but
all of the content and search was powered by DOCS Open. cf.
http://wordofpie.com/2009/09/08/my-first-content-management-application/
Let's back to you for a moment, Can you tell us more about your position? What's your
role and what are you doing day after day?
I run the Information Management Solution for Washington Consulting, Inc. I'm the leading
subject matter expert for our company and I provide guidance to multiple projects and clients
on how to address their needs. On good days, I'm sitting with clients and talking about how to
solve their problems and designing solutions for them. Quite often, I am writing proposals and
finding good people to work with on delivering solutions. I still keep my hands dirty by
playing with the latest releases of software in the ECM space. I say it is to keep current, but I
really do it because I find it relaxing and fun.
http://www.opensourceecm.fr
http://www.open-source-ecm.com
Interview Laurence Hart, Senior Manager/Information
Management Solution Lead at Washington Consulting
Could you present Washington Consulting ? What's the purpose and objectives? What
kind of services do you offer?
We are a Management and Technology consulting firm located in Washington, DC.
Information Management is a big piece of what we do, and that ranges from developing
strategic roadmaps to "simple" Documentum and SharePoint work. However, we also have
ERP implementations, Project Management Office (PMO) support, Organizational Change
Management, and Business Process Reengineering (BPR) practices. They joy of my piece is
that I get to work with all the different groups because everybody is trying to solve the content
"problem".
You have worked with Documentum, since 2000. For my readers, who essentially love
Open Source :o) , could you present this historical CM Solution (its history, its
functionality and its architecture)?
No problem. Founded in 1991, Documentum has been one of the "big-three" ECM vendors
for years, even as that membership has evolved. It is immensely scalable (I have a system
with 40TB of content) and is free of proprietary languages or interfaces. It is very strong in
core content management, RM, and BPM. It's collaboration efforts had been withering for a
few years as eRoom grew old, but their new CenterStage product shows some promise. While
they deliver on WCM and Digital Asset Management, those offerings are stronger when
viewed in combination with the rest of their suite.
I think one area that shows great promise is their work with XML content. Their acquisition
of X-Hive has really helped them here and I think that could become a big differentiators
between the big ECM vendors, assuming that SharePoint doesn't wipe them all out.
Can you tell us what are the strengths and weaknesses of this solution from your point of
view?
I think I covered that to some extent, but I think Documentum has two weaknesses, the user
interface and the complexity. My most successful projects do not utilize the standard user
interface. We use it as a content platform. This is also where it gets complex. I keep learning
things about Documentum everyday. A Document expert is someone that knows enough to
get through any client meeting and can then quickly look-up detailed answers to the things
that they had to bluff their way through. I, and others in the community like Scott Roth and
Johnny Gee, have forgotten more about Documentum than many with 3-4 years experience.
As for strengths, it is strong. I can throw users and content at it without fears that it will scale.
I think that it's object-oriented approach to modeling content is flexible and powerful. They've
extended this to allow custom behaviors on actions, and with version 6.x, they support
aspects. Their is very little that the Documentum platform cannot do, as long as you
understand the complexity.
http://www.opensourceecm.fr
http://www.open-source-ecm.com
Interview Laurence Hart, Senior Manager/Information
Management Solution Lead at Washington Consulting
Now let's start some philosophy :o), during this summer (and last years), you have post
on your blog some information about your vision of ECM ? Could you resume your
vision ? Why have you your personal ECM definition?
My vision for ECM is more than the tools. That is a problem with the AIIM definition, it talks
about tools. Content is everywhere. We need it accessible from everywhere without emailing
it to other companies or having to take it out of one system and placing it in another. ECM is a
platform that provides content to users in the business context where they need it most. Users
shouldn't know about Nuxeo, Alfresco, or Documentum. They should only know that if I scan
this document, I can grab it and the presentation I made yesterday and share it with my
business partner without worrying about the "how".
The technology isn't there yet, but we should be aiming for that target. When ECM was first
coined 10 years ago, no vendor could state that they met the definition.
During this year, you also worked on CMIS. Why are you enthusiastic whith this future
standard and Is it a revolution ?
I'm enthusiastic because the CMIS standard is the first step to making my vision for ECM
complete. Applications need to access content without worrying about the specifics of the
repository in which it is contained. It will allow legacy systems to stay in place longer and
help separate the business application decision from the platform decision.
Is CMIS a revolution? That is a tough question. It is still early to tell as it is just approaching
the Public Review stage. It is already starting to gain traction with vendors and customers, so
I would say that it has the makings of a revolution. If Microsoft continues to support it, and
incorporates it into SharePoint, then I see a revolution as being entirely possible.
What's your feelings about Open Source solution and open source move in CM
ecosystem ?
I'm glad that Open Source is gaining ground. I think it will force the ECM "leaders" to focus
more on simplicity and responding to users. I already see the vendors starting to be more
responsive to user feedback than they had in the past. To be honest, I think the Open Source
movement is a blessing for small to medium organizations that needed content management
but couldn't afford the license fees. I am also beginning to strongly believe that the Open
Source approach is the only way to deliver WCM systems that can keep up with the rapidly
changing face of the Web.
http://www.opensourceecm.fr
http://www.open-source-ecm.com
Interview Laurence Hart, Senior Manager/Information
Management Solution Lead at Washington Consulting
For you what was the worst and best idea on content management area?
The worst idea is simple, moving everyone to a web interface in the 90s. Users had a tightly
integrated desktop environment until IT management fell in love with using web interfaces for
content management. Bad move. We are just now getting to the point where the integration is
as tight with the desktop applications, and that seriously hurt user adoption across the board.
The browsers and web applications just weren't advanced enough, but everyone fell in love
with the sexy new kid on the block.
The best ideas are a toss-up. I think standards like ODMA and CMIS are some of the better
ideas. XML has also been a great idea for changing the way content exists, but the adoption
has been incredibly slow. The best idea may boil down to going electronic and forgetting
about all of that microfiche.
• Blog : http://wordofpie.com
• Twitter : http://twitter.com/piewords
• and his company : http://www.washingtonconsulting.com/
http://www.opensourceecm.fr
http://www.open-source-ecm.com