Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 3

Jo Crowl

Teac 259—Digital Divide Paper

Children Left Behind: The Digital Divide

Technology is rapidly evolving and enhancing global interaction and the exchange of

information. Conference calls can occur with one party halfway across the world. Information

change be exchanged instantaneously through email. As time progresses, more technological

tools become available to use in the global workplace. Most of these tools, however, are not

available for all students to use at any given time. Some students, depending on their situation at

school and at home, are unable to work with technology and learn how to utilize it. The digital

divide, as this is often called, stems from a lack of both technology and educators that creates a

disparity between students based on the necessary skills that students are taught with technology

compared to the skills students do not learn because of a technology deficiency. In a world that is

continuously connected, students need not only the basic skills that enable them to utilize and

apply technology but also a, as Tom Friedman says, “certain mental flexibility, self-motivation,

and psychological mobility" (Hoar, 2006, p. 1). A lack of technology means more than simply a

deficiency of resources for students. At the most base level, a lack of technology and education

leads to a lack in fundamental skills that students need in order to survive in an ever-expanding

workplace.

There are more skills that need to be acquired by students that just the ones listed above.

The Partnership for 21st Century Skills outlines several core areas in which skills are vital to

survive in the 21st Century. These skills include life and career skills, learning and innovation

skills, information, media, and technology skills, and core subjects and 21st century themes

(“Framework for 21st Century Learning” 2009). Technology is a tool used to integrate and teach
these skills to students. Availability to these resources not only affects students and the quality of

his or her education, but also the fundamentals of how a classroom is run by the teacher.

Limited technology impacts not only what a student is able to do but also what a teacher

is able to do with the students. Students who do not have computers available at home would not

likely have basic computer skills such as word processing. Students may have limited knowledge

about how to navigate the Internet. Using applications such as Powerpoint and Excel would

likely be difficult due to the fact that many students would not have had the chance to work with

these programs. A teacher with students who would not have computers available at home would

find it would necessary to cater assignments to the limitations that come with not having a

computer. Research assignments would have to be completed on class trips to the computer lab

or media center. Homework would have to be something that could be completed without a

computer, such as designing a poster, creative writing assignments that would not need to be

typed, and other projects where the need for technology would be minimized. Class time, if

possible, would be spent acquainting students with computers, how to navigate operating

systems, using programs such as Microsoft Office, and how to navigate the Internet for academic

purposes while still teaching the curriculum. This would be achieved through integrative projects

that could be completed in class, such as Powerpoint presentations and research papers.

“Learning through projects while equipped with technology tools allows students to be

intellectually challenged while providing them with a realistic snapshot of what the modern

office looks like,” writes a staff member at Edutopia (“Why Integrate Technology,” 2008).

Unless students are presented with the opportunity to learn the necessary 21st Century Skills, they

will be unable to compete for jobs against other students who went through school acquiring the

skills necessary to work in a global and constantly changing workplace.


Works Cited

Hoar, Jennifer. (June 15, 2006). The Digital Divide 2.0. Retrieved from

http://my.unl.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab=courses&url=/bin/common/course.pl?

course_id=_285275_1

(4/22/2009). Framework for 21st Century Learning. Retrieved from

http://my.unl.edu/@@342D9560D209DE211CE04B338B35E9A0/courses/1/TEAC2590

07.20101/content/_3152455_1/Framework%20for%2021st%20Century%20Learning.pdf

(3/16/2008). Why Integrate Technology into the Curriculum?: The Reasons are Many. Retrieved

from http://my.unl.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?

tab=courses&url=/bin/common/course.pl?course_id=_285275_1

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi