Attribute Gage R & R Effectiveness

Instructions:
1) 2) The following spreadsheet is used to calculate an Attribute GR&R Effectiveness, in which up to 50 samples can be evaluated, using 2 or 3 operators. In the Data Entry worksheet fill in the appropriate information in the Scoring Report section and enter the type of Attributes you are evaluating in the Attribute Legend section. YOU MUST ENTER THE INFORMATION IN THE ATTRIBUTE LEGEND SECTION OR THE SPREADSHEET WILL NOT WORK. The attributes can be either alpha or numeric, e.g. Yes, No; pass, fail; go, stop; or 1, 2. You must be consistent throughout the form and spell properly. If you or an expert has selected samples to be evaluated and you know what attributes these samples are, enter this information in the Attribute sample column. This will enable you to determine how well each operator can evaluate a set of samples against a known standard. You do not need to enter information in this column for the spreadsheet to work although you will not be able to assess the operators against known standards. You do not have to specify how many operators or the # of samples that you will be evaluating during the test. Simply enter the data into the spreadsheet under the specific operator. Remember the attributes must be spelled properly or the spreadsheet will not analyze the data correctly.

3)

4)

The 95% UCL and 95% LCL represent the 95% upper and lower confidence limits on the binomial distribution. The Calculated Score is the basic computation reported on the report page for % Appraiser and % Score vs Attribute. The 95% confidence interval represents the range within which the true Calculated Score lies given the uncertainty associated with limited sample sizes. As sample size increases (in this case, Total Inspected) the confidence interval will get smaller and smaller which indicates more reliable estimates of the true percentages. With a worksheet limitation of 50 samples, at best a lower 95% limit of 96.4% can be calculated. Thus, we would have to say that an inspector could be as bad as 96% efficient, even though he/she missed no calls. Sample Size # Matches 95% UCL Calculated Score 95% LCL 30 30 100.0% 100.0% 88.4% < Try out different combinations of number of samples and number of matches < to see the effects of sample size. In this case, a sample size of 30 with < one non-match will yield a 17% confidence interval. In order to get reasonable < reliability in estimates of efficiency, large sample sizes will be required.

All operators (Jose, Richard and Daniel) are agreed with the known standard
Sample # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 Attribute Information of samples used on the study of Attribute Gage R & R All operators (Jose, Richard and Daniel) are agreed within and between

Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Fail Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass

Humedity

Attribute Gage R & R Effectiveness

SCORING REPORT
Attribute Legend 1 Pass 2 Fail Known Population Sample # Attribute 1 Pass 2 Pass 3 Pass 4 Pass 5 Pass 6 Pass 7 Pass 8 Pass 9 Pass 10 Pass 11 Pass 12 Pass 13 Pass 14 Pass 15 Pass 16 Pass 17 Pass 18 Pass 19 Pass 20 Pass 21 Fail 22 Pass 23 Pass 24 Pass 25 Pass 26 Pass 27 Pass 28 Pass 29 Pass 30 Pass 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 Veronica Morales Try #1 Try #2 Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Fail Fail Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass
5 (used in computations)

DATE: 08/01/13 NAME: TC600 PRODUCT: TC600 BUSINESS:

All operators agree within and between each Other All Operators agree with standard

Leonor Marquez Try #1 Try #2 Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Fail Fail Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass

Try #1

Name C

Try #2

Y/N Agree Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

Y/N Agree Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

% SCORE VS. ATTRIBUTE(2) ->

% APPRAISER SCORE(1) ->

100.00% 100.00%

100.00% 100.00%

0% 0.00%

100.00% SCREEN % EFFECTIVE SCORE vs. ATTRIBUTE (4) -> Note:

SCREEN % EFFECTIVE SCORE(3) ->

100.00%

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

Operator agrees with him/herself on both trials Operator agrees on both trials with the known standard All operators agreed within and between themselves All operators agreed within and between themselves AND agreed with the known standard Enter Pass/Fail, Good/Bad, Accept/Reject or other labels which indicate status of inspection

Attribute Gage R & R Effectiveness

SCORING REPORT
1 Pass 2 Fail

Attribute Legend

DATE: NAME: PRODUCT: BUSINESS:

8/1/2013 TC600 TC600 0 Name C

All operators agree within and between each Other All Operators agree with standard

Known Population Sample # Attribute 1 Pass Pass 2 Pass 3 Pass 4 Pass 5 Pass 6 Pass 7 Pass 8 Pass 9 Pass 10 Pass 11 Pass 12 Pass 13 Pass 14 Pass 15 Pass 16 Pass 17 Pass 18 Pass 19 Pass 20 Fail 21 Pass 22 Pass 23 Pass 24 Pass 25 Pass 26 Pass 27 Pass 28 Pass 29 Pass 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 -

Veronica Morales Try #1 Try #2

Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Fail Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Fail Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass -

Leonor Marquez Try #1 Try #2

Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Fail Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Fail Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass -

Try #1
-

Try #2
-

Y/N Agree Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

Y/N Agree Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

% SCORE VS. ATTRIBUTE(2) ->

% APPRAISER SCORE(1) ->

100.00% 100.00%

100.00% 100.00%

0% 0.00%

100.00% SCREEN % EFFECTIVE SCORE vs. ATTRIBUTE(4) -> Note:

SCREEN % EFFECTIVE SCORE(3) ->

100.00%

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

Operator agrees with him/herself on both trials Operator agrees on both trials with the known standard All operators agreed within and between themselves All operators agreed within and between themselves AND agreed with the known standard Enter Pass/Fail, Good/Bad, Accept/Reject or other labels which indicate status of inspection

Statistical Report - Attribute Gage R&R Study

DATE: 8/1/2013 NAME: TC600 PRODUCT: TC600 BUSINESS: 1/0/1900 % Appraiser1 Veronica MoralesLeonor Marquez 30 30 30 30 %Score vs Attribute2 Veronica MoralesLeonor Marquez Name C 30 30 0 30 30 0

Source Total Inspected # Matched False Negative (operator biased toward rejection) False Positive (operator biased toward acceptance) Mixed 95% UCL 100.0% 100.0% Calculated Score 100.0% 100.0% 95% LCL

Name C 0 0

88.4%

88.4%

#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

0 0 0 100.0% 100.0% 88.4%

0 0 0 100.0% 100.0% 88.4%

0 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Total Inspected # in Agreement 95% UCL Calculated Score 95% LCL

Screen % Effective Score3 30 30

100.0% 100.0% 88.4%

Screen % Effective Score vs Attribute4 30 30

100.0% 100.0% 88.4%

Notes
(1) (2) (3) (4) Operator agrees with him/herself on both trials Operator agrees on both trials with the known standard All operators agreed within and between themselves All operators agreed within & between themselves AND agreed with the known standard

Known Population Sample # Attribute 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 1 10 1 11 1 12 1 13 1 14 1 15 1 16 1 17 1 18 1 19 1 20 1 21 2 22 1 23 1 24 1 25 1 26 1 27 1 28 1 29 1 30 1 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 % Appraiser Score

Try #1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Operator #1 Try #2 within 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

known 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Try #1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Operator #2 Try #2 within 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

known 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Try #1

Operator #3 Try #2 within

known 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Y/N Agree TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE

Y/N Agree TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE

100.00%

100.00%

100.00%

100.00%

0.00%