r
X
i
v
:
h
e
p

t
h
/
9
3
0
2
0
9
7
v
1
2
0
F
e
b
1
9
9
3
November 1992 NTZ 29/92
AN INTRODUCTION INTO
THE FEYNMAN PATH INTEGRAL
CHRISTIAN GROSCHE
International School for Advanced Studies
Via Beirut 4
34014 Trieste, Miramare, Italy
Lecture given at the graduate college Quantenfeldtheorie und deren Anwen
dung in der Elementarteilchen und Festk orperphysik, Universit at Leipzig,
1626 November 1992.
Abstract. In this lecture a short introduction is given into the theory of
the Feynman path integral in quantum mechanics. The general formulation
in Riemann spaces will be given based on the Weyl ordering prescription,
respectively product ordering prescription, in the quantum Hamiltonian. Also,
the theory of spacetime transformations and separation of variables will be
outlined. As elementary examples I discuss the usual harmonic oscillator, the
radial harmonic oscillator, and the Coulomb potential.
Contents
Contents
Page
I Introduction 2
II General Theory 5
II.1 The Feynman Path Integral 5
II.2 WeylOrdering 10
II.3 ProductOrdering 17
II.4 SpaceTime Transformations 21
II.5 Separation of Variables 30
III Important Examples 33
III.1 The Free Particle 33
III.2 The Harmonic Oscillator 34
III.3 The Radial Path Integral 40
III.3.1 The General Radial Path Integral 40
III.3.2 The Radial Harmonic Oscillator 50
III.4 Other Elementary Path Integrals 57
III.5 The Coulomb Potential 59
III.5.1 The 1/rPotential in R
2
61
III.5.2 The 1/rPotential in R
3
 The Hydrogen Atom 68
III.5.3 Coulomb Potential and 1/rPotential in D Dimensions 74
III.5.4 Axially Symmetric CoulombLike Potentials 81
Bibliography 89
1
Introduction
I INTRODUCTION
It was Feynmans (and Diracs [20]) genius [32, 33] to realize that the integral kernel
(propgator) of the timeevolution operator can be expressed as a sum over all possible
paths connecting the points q
and q
, q
; T)/h
, where
S is the action, i.e.
K(q
, q
; T) =
all paths
A e
iS(q
,q
;T)/ h
(1.1)
with some appropriate normalization A.
Surprisingly enough, the same calculus (same in the sense of a nave analytical
continuation) was already know to mathematicians due to Wiener in the study of
stochastic processes. This calculus in functional space (Wiener measure) attracted
several mathematicians, including Kac (who mentioned being inuenced by Feynmans
work!), and was further developed by several authors, where best known is the work
of Cameron and Martin. The standard reference concerning these achievements is the
review paper of Gelfand and Yaglom [37], where all these early work was rst critically
discussed.
Unfortunately, the discussion between physicists and mathematicians remains
near to nothing for quite a long time, except for [37]; the situation changed with
Nelson [80], and nowadays there are many attempts to understand the path integral
mathematically despite its pathalogies of innite measure, innite sums of phases
with unit absolute values etc.
In particular, the work of MoretteDeWitt starting with her early paper [76] gave
rise to a beautiful theory of the semiclassical expansion in powers of h [18, 19, 7779].
As it is known for quite a long time, the propagator can be expressed semiclassically as
e
i S
Cl
/ h
, with S
Cl
the classical action, times a prefactor. This prefactor is remarkably
simple, namely one has
K
WKB
(x
, x
; t
, t
) = [g(x
)g(x
)]
1
4
_
1
2 i h
_
D/2
det
_
2
S
Cl
[x
, x
]
x
a
x
b
_
exp
_
i
h
S
Cl
[x
, x
]
_
. (1.2)
g = det(g
ab
) of some possible metric structure of a Riemannian space, and the
determinant
M := det
_
2
S
Cl
[x
, x
]
x
a
x
b
_
(1.3)
is known as the Paulivan VleckMorette determinant. The semiclassical (WKB) solu
tion of the Feynman kernel (we use the notions semiclassical and WKB simultaneously)
is based on the fact that the harmonic oscillator, respectively, the general quadratic
Lagrangian, is exactly solvable and its solution is only determined by the classical
path and not on the summation over all paths. As it turns out, an arbitrary kernel
can be expanded in terms of the classical paths as an expansion in powers of h. The
semiclassical kernel (at least its short time representation) is known since van Vleck,
derived by the correspondence principle. Later on Pauli [83] has given a detailed dis
cussion in his wellknown lecture notes. More rigorously the short time propagator for
the onedimensional case was discussed by Morette [76] in 1951 and a few years later
2
I Introduction
by DeWitt [17] extending the previous work to Ddimensional curved spaces. Con
cerning the semiclassical expansion, every path integral with a Hamiltonian which
is quadratic in its momenta can be expanded about the semiclassical approximation
(1.2) giving a consistent and converging theory, compare DeWittMorette [18, 19, 74,
75, 77].
Supersymmetric quantum mechanics provides a very convenient way of classifying
exactly solvable models in usual quantum mechanics, and a systematic way of
addressing the problem of nding all exactly solvable potentials [56].
By e.g. Dutt et al. [16, 29] it was shown that there are a total of twelve dierent po
tentials. A glance on these potentials shows that their corresponding Schrodinger equa
tion leads either to the dierential equation of the conuent hypergeometric dierential
equation with eigenfunctions proportional to Laguerre polynomials (bound states)
and Whittaker functions (continuous states), respectively to the dierential equation
of the hypergeometric dierential equation with eigenfunctions proportional to Ja
cobi polynomials (bound states) and hypergeometric functions (continuous states).
In Reference [16] this topic was nicely addressed and it was shown that in principle
the radial harmonic oscillator and the (modied) PoschlTellerpotential solutions are
sucient to give the solutions of all remaining ones, together with the technique of
spacetime transformations as introduced by Duru and Kleinert [27, 28, 62] (see also
reference [49], Ho and Inomata [55], Steiner [90], and Pak and Sokmen [82]) enables
one to give the explicit path integral solution of the Coulomb V
(C)
(r) = e
2
/r (r > 0)
and the Morse potential V
(M)
(x) = ( h
2
A
2
/2m)(e
2x
2e
x
) (x R) (compare e.g.
reference [46] for a review of some recent results). The same line of reasoning is true for
the path integral solution of the (modied) PoschlTeller potential [535] which give in
turn the path integral solutions for the RosenMorse V
(RM)
(x) = AtanhxB/ cosh
2
x
(x R), the hyperbolic ManningRosen V
(MRa)
(r) = Acothr +B/ sinh
2
r (r > 0),
and the trigonometric ManningRosenlike potential V
(MRb)
(x) = Acot x+B/ sin
2
x
(0 < x < ), respectively [44].
These lecture notes are far from being a comprehensive introduction into the
whole topic of path integrals, in particular if eld theory is concerned. As old as
they be, the books of Feynman and Hibbs [34] and Schulman [86] as still a must for
becoming familiar with the subject. A more recent contribution is due to Kleinert
[64]. Myself and F. Steiner are presently preparing extended lecture notes Feynman
Path Integrals and a Table of Feynman Path Integrals [50, 51], which will appear
next year.
Several reviews have been written about path integrals, let me note Gelfand and
Jaglom [37], Albeverio et al. [13], DeWittMorette et al. [19, 79], Marinov [73], and
e.g. for the topic of path integrals for Coulomb potentials [46].
The contents of the lecture is as follows. In the next Chapter I outline the basic
theory of the Feynman path integral, i.e. the lattice denition according to the Weyl
ordering prescription in the Hamiltonian and a related prescription which is of use
in several applications in my own work. Furthermore, the technique of canonical
coordinate, time and spacetime transformations will be presented. The Chapter
closes with the discussion of separation of variables in path integrals.
In the third chapter I present some important examples of exact path integral
evaluations. This includes, of course, the harmonic oscillator in its simplest form. I also
discuss the radial path integral with its application of the exact treatment of the radial
(timedependent) harmonic oscillator. The chapter concludes with a comprehensive
discussion of the Coulomb potential, including the genuine Coulomb problem, its D
3
Introduction
dimensional generalization, and a generalization with additional axiallysymmetric
terms.
Acknowledgement
Finally I want to thank the organizers of this graduate college for their kind invitation
to give this lecture. I also want to thank F. Steiner which whom part of the presented
material was compiled.
4
II.1 The Feynman Path Integral
II GENERAL THEORY
1. The Feynman Path Integral
In order to set up the requirements of the path integral formalism we start with the
generic case, where the time dependent Schrodinger equation in some Ddimensional
Riemannian manifold M with metric g
ab
and line element ds
2
= g
ab
dq
a
dq
b
is given by
_
h
2
2m
LB
+V (q)
_
(q; t) =
h
i
t
(q; t). (1.1)
is some state function, dened in the Hilbert space L
2
 the space of all square
integrable functions in the sense of the scalar product (f
1
, f
2
) =
_
M
g f
1
(q)f
2
(q)dq
[g := det(g
ab
), f
1
, f
2
L
2
] and
LB
is the LaplaceBeltrami operator
LB
:= g
1
2
a
g
1
2
g
ab
b
= g
ab
b
+g
ab
(
a
ln
g )
b
+ g
ab
,a
b
(1.2)
(implicit sums over repeated indices are understood).
The Hamiltonian H :=
h
2
2m
LB
+ V (q) is usually dened in some dense subset
D(H) L
2
, so that H is selfadjoint. In contrast to the time independent Schrodinger
equation, H = E, which is an eigenvalue problem, and equation (1.1) which are
both dened on D(H), the unitary operator U(T) := e
i TH/ h
describes the time
evolution of arbitrary states L
2
(timeevolution operator): H is the innitessimal
generator of U. The time evolution for some state reads: (t
) = U(t
, t
)(t
)
Rewriting the time evolution with U(T) as an integral operator we get
(q
; t
) =
_
_
g(q
)K(q
, q
; t
, t
)(q
; t
)dq
, (1.3)
where K(T) is the celebrated Feynman kernel. Equations (1.1) and (1.3) are
connected. Having an explicit expression for K(T) in (1.3) one can derive in the
limit T = 0 equation (1.1). This, on the other hand proves that K(T) is indeed
the correct integral kernel corresponding to U(T). A rigorous proof includes, of course,
the check of the selfadjointness of H, i.e. H = H
, q
; t
+ t
) =
_
K(q
, q; t
+ t)K(q, q
; t + t
)dq (1.5)
In the case of an Euclidean space, where g
ab
=
ab
, S is just the classical action,
S
Cl
=
_ _
m
2
q
2
V (q)
dt =
_
L
cl
(q, q)dt, and we get explicitly [q
(j)
:= (q
(j)
q
(j1)
),
q
(j)
= q(t
j
), t
j
= t
+ j, = (t
, q
; T) = lim
N
_
m
2 i hT
_ND
2
N1
j=1
_
dq
(j)
exp
_
_
_
i
h
N
j=1
_
m
2
2
q
(j)
V (q
(j)
)
_
_
_
_
.
5
General Theory
q(t
)=q
_
q(t
)=q
Dq(t) exp
_
i
h
_
t
_
m
2
q
2
V (q)
_
dt
_
(1.6)
For an arbitrary metric g
ab
things are unfortunately not so easy. The rst formulation
for this case is due to DeWitt [17]. His result reads:
K(q
, q
; T)
=
q(t
)=q
_
q(t
)=q
g D
DeW
q(t) exp
_
i
h
_
t
_
m
2
g
ab
(q) q
a
q
b
V (q) + h
2
R
6m
_
dt
_
:= lim
N
_
m
2 i h
_
ND/2
N1
j=1
_
_
g(q
(j)
) dq
(j)
exp
_
_
_
i
h
N
j=1
_
m
2
g
ab
(q
(j1)
)q
a,(j)
q
b,(j)
V (q
(j1)
) +
h
2
6m
R(q
(j1)
)
_
_
_
_
(1.7)
(R = g
ab
(
c
ab,c
c
cb,a
+
d
ab
c
cd
d
cb
c
ad
)  scalar curvature;
a
bc
= g
ad
(g
bd,c
+g
dc,b
g
bc,d
)  Christoel symbols). Of course, we identify q
= q
(0)
and q
= q
(N)
in the
limit N . Two comments are in order:
1) Equation (1.7) has the form of equation (1.6) but the corresponding S =
_
Ldt
is not the classical action, respectively the Lagrangian L is not the classical
Lagrangian L(q, q) =
m
2
g
ab
q
a
q
b
V (q), but rather an eective one:
S
eff
=
_
L
eff
dt
_
(L
cl
V
DeW
)dt. (1.8)
The quantum correction V
DeW
=
h
2
6m
R is indispensible in order to derive from
the time evolution equation (1.3) the Schrodinger equation (1.1) (e.g. [24]). The
appearance of a quantum correction V is a very general feature for path integrals
dened on curved manifolds; but, of course, V h
2
depends on the lattice
denition.
2) A specic lattice denition has been chosen. The metric terms in the action are
evaluated at the prepoint q
(j1)
. Changing the lattice denition, i.e. evaluation
of the metric terms at other points, e.g. the postpoint q
(j)
or the midpoint
q
(j)
:=
1
2
(q
(j)
+q
(j1)
) changes V , because in a Taylor expansion of the relevant
terms, all terms of O() contribute to the path integral. This fact is particularly
important in the expansion of the kinetic term in the Lagrangian, where we have
4
q
(j)
/ O().
One of the basics requirements of the construction of the path integral is Trotters
[93] product formula. Discussions and proofs can be found in many textbooks on
functional integration and functional analysis (e.g. Reed and Simon [85], Simon [87]).
Let us shortly notice a simple proof [87] :
Theorem: Let A and B be selfadjoint operators on a separable Hilbert space so that
A+B, dened on D(A) . . . D(B), is selfadjoint. Then
e
i T(A+B)
= slim
N
_
e
i tA/N
e
i tB/N
_
N
. (1.9)
6
II.1 The Feynman Path Integral
If furthermore, A and B are bounded from below, then
e
t(A+B)
= slim
N
_
e
tA/N
e
tB/N
_
N
. (1.10)
Proof ([80,87]): Let S
T
= e
i T(A+B)
, V
T
= e
i TA
, W
T
= e
i TB
, U
T
= V
T
W
T
, and
let
T
= S
T
for some H, with underlying Hilbert space H. Then
(S
T
U
N
T/N
) =
_
_
_
_
_
N1
j=0
U
j
T/N
(S
T/N
U
T/N
)
Nj1
_
_
_
_
_
N sup
0sT
(S
T
U
T/N
). (1.11)
Let D(A) D(B). Then s
1
(S
s
1) i(A+ B) for s 0 and
U
s
1
s
= V
s
(i B) + V
s
_
W
s
1
s
i B
_
+
V
s
1
s
i B + i A + 0 (1.12)
hence
lim
N
_
N(S
T/N
U
T/N
)
_
0, for each D(A) D(B). (1.13)
Now let D denote D(A) D(B) with the norm (A + B) +
A+B
.
By hypothesis, D is a Banach space. With the calculations of equations (1.11
1.13), {N(S
t/N
U
t/N
)} is a family of bounded operators from D to H with
sup
N
{N(S
T/N
U
T/N
)} < for each . As a result, the uniform boundedness
principle implies that
N(S
T/N
U
T/N
) C
A+B
(1.14)
for some positive C. Therefore the limit (1.14) is uniform over compact subsets of
D. Now let D. Then s
s
is a continuous map from [0, T] into D, so that
{
s
0 s T} is compact in D. Thus the righthand side of equation (1.14) goes to
zero as N The proof of equation (1.10) is similar.
7
General Theory
The conditions on the operators A and B can be weakened with the requirement
that they are fulll some positiveness and possesses a particular selfadjoint exten
sion.
Thus we see that ordering prescriptions in the quantum Hamiltonian and corre
sponding lattice formulations in the path integral are closely related (compare also
[22, 23]). This can be formulated in a systematic way (e.g. [68] ):
We consider a monomial in coordinates and momenta (classical quantities)
M(n, m) = q
1
. . . q
n
p
1
. . . p
m
(1.15)
We want to have a correspondence rule according to
exp
_
i
h
(uq +vp)
_
D
(u, v; q
, p
) (u, v) exp
_
i
h
(uq
+ vp
)
_
(1.16)
to generate operators q
, p
n+m
D
(u, v; q
, p
)
u
1
. . . u
n
v
1
. . . v
u=v=0
. (1.17)
Some better known examples are displayed in the following table
Correspondence Rule (u, v) Ordering Rule
Weyl 1
1
2
n
n
l=0
_
n
l
_
q
nl
p
m
q
l
Symmetric cos
u v
2
1
2
(q
n
p
m
+ p
m
q
n
)
Standard exp
_
i
u v
2
_
q
n
p
m
AntiStandard exp
_
i
u v
2
_
p
m
q
n
BornJordan sin
u v
2
_
u v
2
1
m + 1
n
l=0
p
ml
q
n
p
l
We can make this correspondence explicit. Let us consider the Fourier integral
A(p, q) =
_
A(u, v) exp
_
i
h
(uq +ivp)
_
dudv
A(u, v) =
1
(2h)
D
_
A(p, q) exp
_
i
h
(uq +ivp)
_
dpdq
(1.18)
We dene the operator A
(p
, q
) via
A
(p
, q
) =
_
A(u, v)(u, v) exp
_
i
h
(uq
+ ivp
)
_
dudv, (1.19)
8
II.2 WeylOrdering
which gives
A
(p
, q
) =
1
(2h)
D
_
A(p, q)(u, v) exp
_
i
h
u(q q
)
i
h
v(pp
)
_
dudvdpdq. (1.20)
The inverse transformation is denoted by A
(p, q) =
1
(2h)
D
Tr
_
A
(p
, q
)[(u, v)]
1
exp
_
i
h
u(q q
)+i
i
h
v(pp
)
_
dudv. (1.21)
In particular, the function has the correspondence operator
(p p
, q q
) =
1
(2h)
D
_
(u, v) exp
_
i
h
u(q q
)
i
h
v(p p
)
_
dudv. (1.22)
Let us turn to the Hamiltonian. Given a classical Hamiltonian H
cl
(p, q) the
quantum Hamiltonian is calculated as
H
(p
, q
) =
_
exp
_
i
h
up
+
i
h
vq
_
(u, v)
H
cl
(u, v)dudv
H
cl
(u, v) =
1
(2h)
2D
_
exp
_
i
h
up
i
h
uq
_
H
cl
(p, q)dpdq.
(1.23)
Obviously, by proposing a particular classical Hamiltonian depending on variables q
and q
, q
) =
1
(2h)
D
_
(q
, y) e
ivy/ h
H
cl
[p,
1
2
(q
+q
) v]dudv (1.24)
For = 1 and = cos
uv
2
, respectively, we obtain Hamiltonian functions according to
H(p, q
, q
) = H(p,
1
2
(q
+ q
))
H(p, q
, q
) =
1
2
[H
cl
(p, q
) +H
cl
(p, q
)]
(1.25)
which are the matrix elements
< q
H
(p
, q
)q
> (1.26)
of the quantum Hamiltonians which are Weyl and symmetrically ordered, respectively.
Choosing (u, v) = exp[i(1 2u)uv] [54] yields
H(p, q; u) =
q
2m
g
ab
(q)p
a
p
b
+
i h
m
(
1
2
u)p
a
g
ab
,b
h
2
2m
(
1
2
u)
2
g
ab
,ab
+V
Weyl
. (1.27)
with the welldened quantum potential
V
Weyl
=
h
2
8m
(g
ab
d
ac
c
bd
R) =
h
2
8m
_
g
ab
b
+ 2(g
ab
a
)
,b
+g
ab
,ab
_
(1.28)
u =
1
2
corresponds to the Weyl prescription and is clearly emphazised.
In the next two Sections we discuss two particular ordering prescriptions and the
corresponding matrix elements which will appear as the relevant quantities to be used
in path integrals on curved spaces, it will be the Weylordering prescription (leading
to the midpoint rule in the path integral) and a product ordering (leading to a product
rule in the path integral).
Another approach due to Kleinert [63, 64] I will not discuss here.
9
General Theory
2. WeylOrdering
A very convenient lattice prescription is the midpoint denition, which is connected to
the Weylordering prescription in the Hamiltonian H. Let us discuss this prescription
in some detail. First we have to construct momentum operators [83]:
p
a
=
h
i
_
q
a
+
a
2
_
,
a
=
ln
g
q
a
(2.1)
which are hermitean with respect to the scalar product (f
1
, f
2
) =
_
f
1
f
g dq. In
terms of the momentum operators (2.1) we rewrite the quantum Hamiltonian H by
using the Weylordering prescription [49,69,72]
H(p, q) =
1
8m
(g
ab
p
a
p
b
+ 2p
a
g
ab
p
b
+p
a
p
b
g
ab
) + V
Weyl
(q) + V (q). (2.2)
Here a welldened quantum correction appears which is given by [49,72,81]:
V
Weyl
=
h
2
8m
(g
ab
d
ac
c
bd
R) =
h
2
8m
_
g
ab
b
+ 2(g
ab
a
)
,b
+g
ab
,ab
_
(2.3)
The Weylordering prescription is the most discussed ordering prescription in the
literature. Let us start by dening it for powers of position and momentum operators
q
and p
, respectively [69]:
(q
m
p
r
)
Weyl
=
_
1
2
_
m m
l=0
m!
l!(ml)!
q
ml
p
r
q
l
, (2.4)
with the matrix elements (onedimensional case)
< q
(q
m
p
r
)
Weyl
q
> =
_
1
2
_
m m
l=0
m!
l!(ml)!
q
ml
< q
p
r
q
> q
l
=
_
dp
(2h)
D
p
r
e
i p(q
)/ h
_
q
+ q
2
_
m
(2.5)
and all coordinate dependent quantities turn out to be evaluated at midpoints. Here
was used that the matrix elements of the position q > and momentum eigenstates
p > have the property
< q
q
>= (g
)
1/4
(q
, q
) as [72]:
A(p, q)
_
dv e
i pv
< q
v
2
A
(p
, q
)q +
v
2
>, (2.7)
10
II.2 WeylOrdering
with the inverse transformation
A
(p
, q
) =
1
(2h)
D
_
dpdqA(p, q)(p, q)
(p
, q
) =
_
du e
i pu
p
u
2
>< p +
u
2
.
(2.8)
Let us consider some simple examples. First of all for some operator f(p
)
_
dv e
i pv/ h
< q
v
2
f(p
)q +
v
2
>
=
_
dvdp
e
i pv/ h
< q
v
2
f(q
)p
>< p
q +
v
2
>
=
1
(2h)
D
_
dvdp
e
i(pp
)v/ h
f(p
) = f(p). (2.9)
Hence (and similarly)
f(p
) f(p), f(q
) f(q). (2.10)
Straightforwardly one shows the following correspondence
F(q
)p
i
g
ij
(q
)p
j
F(q
)
p
i
p
j
F
2
(q)g
ij
+
1
2
_
1
2
F
2
(q)g
ij
,ij
(q) +F
,i
(q)F
,j
(q)g
ij
(q) F
,ij
(q)F(q)g
ij
(q)
_
(2.11)
Special cases are
p
i
p
j
F(q
)
_
p
i
i h
2
q
i
__
p
j
i h
2
q
j
_
F(q)
p
i
F(q
)p
j
_
p
i
i h
2
q
i
__
p
j
+
i h
2
q
j
_
F(q)
p
i
F(q
)p
j
_
p
i
+
i h
2
q
i
__
p
j
+
i h
2
q
j
_
F(q).
(2.12)
For the case that F(q) is some symmetric N N matrix we have
1
4
_
p
i
p
j
F
ij
(q
) + 2p
i
F
ij
(q
)p
j
+ F
ij
(q
)p
i
p
j
_
p
i
p
j
F
ij
(q). (2.13)
There is, of course, a onetoone correspondence between the function A(p, q) and the
operator A(p
, q
, q
; T) =
_
q
exp
_
i
h
H
(p
, q
)
_
_
=
_
_
N1
j=1
_
_
g
(j)
dq
(j)
_
_
N
j=1
_
q
(j)
exp
_
i
h
T
N
H
(p
, q
)
_
q
(j1)
_
. (2.14)
Observing
< q
(p
, q
)q
> =
_
du e
i uq
< q
p
u
2
>< p +
u
2
q
>
=
1
(2h)
D
_
du exp
_
i
h
p(q
) +
i
h
u
_
q
q
+ q
2
__
= e
i p(q
)/ h
_
q
q
+q
2
_
(2.15)
and making use of the Trotter formula e
i t(A+B)
= slim
N
_
e
i tA/N
e
i tB/N
_
N
and the shorttime approximation for the matrix element < q
 e
i H
q
>:
< q
(j)
 exp
_
i H
(p
, q
)/h
_
q
(j1)
>
=
1
(2h)
D
< q
(j)
_
dpdq e
i h(p,q)/ h
_
dudv exp
_
i(q q
)u+i(pp
)v
q
(j1)
>
=
1
(2h)
D
_
dp exp
_
i
h
p(q
(j)
q
(j1)
)
i
h
H(p, q
(j)
)
_
, (2.16)
where q
(j)
=
1
2
(q
(j)
+ q
(j1)
) is the midpoint coordinate.
Let us consider the classical Hamiltonfunction
H
cl
(p, q) =
1
2m
g
ab
(q)
_
p
a
A
a
(q)
_
p
b
A
b
(q)
+ V (q). (2.17)
The corresponding quantum mechanical operator is not clearly dened due to the
factor ordering ambiguity. Let us try the manifestly hermitean operator
H(p
, q
) =
1
2m
g
1
4
_
p
a
A
a
(q
g
1
2
(q
)g
ab
(q
)
_
p
b
A
a
(q
1
4
(q
) + V (q
). (2.18)
The Weyltransformed of H reads
H(p, q) = H
cl
(p, q) +
h
2
2m
_
1
4
g
1
2
_
g
1
2
g
ab
_
,ab
+
1
2
_
g
1
4
_
,a
_
g
1
4
_
,b
g
1
2
g
ab
1
2
_
g
1
4
_
,ab
g
1
4
g
ab
_
12
II.2 WeylOrdering
= H
cl
(p, q) +
h
2
8m
_
m
la
l
mb
g
ab
R
= H
cl
(p, q) +
h
2
8m
_
g
ab
b
+ 2(g
ab
a
)
,b
+ g
ab
,ab
_
(2.19)
and, of course, V
Weyl
appears again. For the path integral all quantities have to
be evaluated at q
(j)
. Note: The Weyltransformed of the the Weylordered operator
(2.16) is just the classical Hamiltonian (2.17). Inserting all quantities in equation
(2.13) we obtain the Hamiltonian path integral:
K(q
, q
; T) = [g(q
)g(q
)]
1
4
lim
N
N1
j=1
_
dq
(j)
j=1
_
dp
(j)
(2h)
D
exp
_
_
_
i
h
N
j=1
_
q
(j)
p
(j)
H
eff
(p
(j)
, q
(j)
)
_
_
_
_
. (2.20)
The eective Hamiltonian to be used in the path integral (2.20) reads,
H(p, q) = H
eff
(p
(j)
, q
(j)
) =
1
2m
g
ab
( q
(j)
)p
(j)
a
p
(j)
b
+ V ( q
(j)
) + V
Weyl
( q
(j)
). (2.21)
With the help of the famous Gaussian integral
_
e
p
2
x
2
qx
dx =
p
exp
_
q
2
4p
2
_
(2.22)
and, respectively, by its Ddimensional generalization
_
R
n
dp e
iqp
1
2
g
ab
p
a
p
b
= (2)
D/2
_
det(g
ab
) exp
_
1
2
g
ab
q
a
q
b
_
, (2.23)
we get by integrating out the momenta the Lagrangian path integral which reads
(MP = MidPoint):
K(q
, q
; T) = [g(q
)g(q
)]
1
4
q(t
)=q
_
q(t
)=q
g D
MP
q(t) exp
_
i
h
_
t
L
eff
(q, q)dt
_
:= [g(q
)g(q
)]
1
4
lim
N
_
m
2 i h
_ND
2
_
_
N1
j=1
_
dq
(j)
_
_
j=1
_
g( q
(j)
) exp
_
i
h
_
m
2
g
ab
( q
(j)
)q
a,(j)
q
b,(j)
V ( q
(j)
) V
Weyl
( q
(j)
)
__
.
(2.24)
13
General Theory
Equation (2.24) is, of course, equivalent with equation (1.7). The midpoint pre
scription arises here in a very natural way, as a consequence of the Weylordering
prescription. This is a general feature that ordering prescriptions lead to specic
lattices and that dierent lattices dene dierent V .
To proof that the path integral (2.24) is indeed the correct one, one has to show
that with the corresponding short time kernel
K(q
(j)
, q
(j1)
; ) =
_
m
2 i h
_
D/2
[g(q
(j1)
)g(q
(j)
)]
1
4
_
g( q
(j)
)
exp
_
i
h
_
m
2
g
ab
( q
(j)
)q
a,(j)
q
b,(j)
V ( q
(j)
) V
Weyl
( q
(j)
)
__
. (2.25)
and the time evolution equation (1.3) the Schrodinger equation (1.1) follows. For this
purpose a Taylor expansion has to performed in equation (1.3) yielding
(q
, t) +
(q
; t)
t
= B
0
(q
; t) +B
q
b
(q
; t)
q
b
+ B
q
a
q
b
2
(q
; t)
q
b
q
a
+ . . . , (2.26)
where the coecients in the expansion are given by
B
0
=
_
dq
_
g(q
)K(q
, q
; )
_
m
2 i h
_
D/2
g
1
4
(q
) e
i [V (q
)+V (q
)]/ h
_
dq
g
1
2
( q)g
1
4
(q
) exp
_
i m
2h
q
a
a
g
b
q
b
_
(2.27)
B
q
b =
_
dq
_
g(q
)K(q
, q
; )q
b
_
m
2 i h
_
D/2
g
1
4
(q
)
_
dq
g
1
2
( q)g
1
4
(q
) exp
_
i m
2h
q
a
a
g
b
q
b
_
q
b
(2.28)
B
q
a
q
b =
_
dq
_
g(q
)K(q
, q
; )q
a
q
b
_
m
2 i
_
D/2
g
1
4
(q
)
_
dq
g
1
2
( q)g
1
4
(q
) exp
_
i m
2h
q
a
a
g
b
g
b
_
q
a
q
b
(2.29)
From these representations it is clear that we need equivalence relations (in the sense
of path integrals) for q
a
q
b
etc. They are given by
q
a
q
b
=
i h
m
g
ab
(2.30)
q
a
q
b
q
c
q
d
=
_
i h
m
_
2
_
g
ab
g
cd
+g
ac
g
bd
+g
ad
g
bc
. (2.31)
14
II.2 WeylOrdering
q
a
q
b
q
c
q
d
q
e
q
f
=
_
i h
m
_
3
_
g
ab
g
cd
g
cd
+g
ac
g
bd
g
ef
+g
ad
g
bc
g
ef
+ g
ab
g
ce
g
df
+g
ab
g
cf
g
de
+ g
cd
g
ae
g
bf
+ g
cd
g
af
g
be
+ g
ac
g
be
g
df
+g
ac
g
bf
g
de
+ g
bd
g
ae
g
cf
+ g
bd
g
af
g
ce
+ g
ad
g
be
g
cf
+ g
ad
g
bf
g
ce
+ g
bc
g
ae
g
df
+ g
bc
g
af
g
de
_
.
(2.32)
We just show the identity (2.30), the proof of the remaining ones is similarly. Let us
consider the integral
I(g
cd
) =
_
dq exp
_
i m
2h
q
c
g
cd
q
d
_
=
_
m
2 i hg
(2.33)
with the g
cd
as free parameters. Dierentiation with respect to one of the parameters
gives on the one hand:
g
ab
I(g
cd
) =
i m
2h
_
dq exp
_
i m
2h
q
c
g
cd
q
d
_
q
a
q
b
(2.34)
and on the other
g
ab
I(g
cd
) =
_
m
2 i h
g
ab
g
1/2
=
1
2
_
m
2 i h
g
1/2
g
ab
=
1
2
g
ab
I(g
cd
). (2.35)
Here we have used the formula for the dierentiation of determinants: g/g
ab
= g g
ab
.
Combining the last two equations yield (2.30).
Let us denote by = q
and q = q
a
+
1
8
(4
a
b
+ 3
a,b
)
a
b
_
.
(2.36)
exp
_
i m
2h
g
ab
(q )
a
b
_
exp
_
i m
2h
g
ab
(q)
a
b
_
_
1 +
m
2 i h
g
ab
b
cd
m
8 i h
_
g
av
v
bc,d
+g
au
a
vd
v
bc
+ g
uv
u
ad
v
bc
_
d
+
1
2
_
m
2 i h
_
2
g
av
g
du
v
bc
u
ef
f
_
. (2.37)
Here the various derivatives of the metric tensor g
ab
have been expressed by the
15
General Theory
Christoel symbols. Thus combining the last two equations yield:
g
1/4
(q )g
1/2
(q ) exp
_
i m
2h
g
ab
(q )
a
b
_
g
3/4
(q) exp
_
i m
2h
g
ab
(q)
a
b
_
_
1
_
a
+
m
2 i h
g
a
d
d
bc
_
c
+
1
2
_
m
2 i h
_
2
g
av
g
du
v
bc
u
ef
m
8 i h
_
g
av
v
bc,d
+g
au
a
vd
v
bc
+ g
uv
u
ad
v
bc
_
d
+
1
8
(4
a
b
+ 3
a,b
)
a
b
_
.
(2.38)
Let us start with the B
ab
terms. We get immediately by equation (2.30):
B
ab
=
i h
2m
g
ab
. (2.39)
Similarly:
B
a
=
i h
2m
[
a
g
ab
+ (
a
g
ab
)] (2.40)
For the
2
 and
4
terms in B
0
we get:
1
8
(4
a
b
+ 3
a,b
)
a
b
=
i h
8m
g
ab
(4
a
b
+ 3
a,b
), (2.41)
m
8 i h
_
g
av
v
bc,d
+g
au
a
vd
v
bc
+ g
uv
u
ad
v
bc
_
d
=
i h
8m
g
ab
_
8
a
b
+
c
ab,c
+ 2
a,b
+ g
uv
g
cd
(2
u
ad
v
bc
+
u
ab
v
cd
) + 5
c
ab
c
bd
+ 2
d
ac
c
bd
_
.
(2.42)
For the
6
terms equation (2.32) yields
1
2
_
m
2 i h
_
2
g
av
g
du
v
bc
u
ef
f
=
i h
8m
g
ab
_
4
a
b
+ 4
c
ab
c
+ 4
d
ac
c
bd
+g
uv
g
cd
(2
u
ac
v
bd
+
u
ab
v
cd
)
_
. (2.43)
Therefore combining the relevant terms yields nally:
_
g
1/4
(q )g
1
2
(q
) exp
_
i m
2h
g
ab
(q
)
a
b
_
d
=
_
m
2 i h
_
D/2
_
1 +
i h
8m
g
ab
_
a,b
c
ab
c
+ 2
d
ac
c
bd
c
ab,c
_
_
=
_
m
2 i h
_
D/2
exp
_
i
h
V
Weyl
_
. (2.44)
16
II.3 ProductOrdering
Inserting all the contributions into equation (2.67) yields the Schrodinger equation
(1.1).
Let us emphasize that the above procedure is nothing but a formal proof of the
path integral. A rigorous proof must include at least two more ingredients
1) One must show that in fact
lim
N
[e
i TH/ h
K(T)] 0 (2.45)
for all H (H: relevant Hilbert space).
2) One must show that the domain D of the innitessimal generator of the kernel
K(T) is in fact identical with the domain of the Hamiltonian corresponding to
the Schr odinger equation (1.1), i.e. the innitessimal generator is the (selfadjoint)
Hamiltonian.
It is quite obvious that these strong mathematical requirements hold only under certain
assumptions on the potential involved in the Hamiltonian. Here Nelson [80] has shown
the validity of the path integral for one dimensional path integrals. Some instructive
proof can be furthermore found in the books of Simon [87] and Reed and Simon [85].
Also due to Albeverio et al. [13] is a wide range of discussion to formulate the Feynman
path integral without the delay of go back to the denition of Wiener integrals.
3. ProductOrdering
In order to develop another useful lattice formulation for path integrals we consider
again the generic case [43]. We assume that the metric tensor g
ab
is real and symmetric
and has rank(g
ab
) = D, i.e. we have no constraints on the coordinates. Thus one
can always nd a linear transformation C : q
a
= C
ab
y
b
such that L
Cl
=
m
2
ab
y
a
y
b
with
ab
= C
ac
g
cd
C
db
and where is diagonal. C has the form C
ab
= u
(b)
a
where
the u
(b)
(b {1, . . . , d}) are the eigenvectors of g
ab
and
ab
= f
2
c
ac
bc
where f
2
a
= 0
(a {1, . . . , d}) are the eigenvalues of g
ab
. Without loss of generality we assume f
2
a
> 0
for all a {1, . . . , d}. (For a time like coordinate q
a
one might have e.g. f
2
a
< 0, but
cases like this we want to exclude). Thus one can always nd a representation for g
ab
which reads,
g
ab
(q) = h
ac
(q)h
bc
(q). (3.1)
Here the h
ab
= C
ac
f
c
C
cb
= u
(a)
c
f
c
u
(b)
c
are real symmetric D D matrices and satisfy
h
ab
h
bc
=
c
a
. Because there exists the orthogonal transformation C equation (3.1)
yields for the ycoordinate system (denoted by M
y
):
ab
(y) = f
2
c
(y)
ac
bc
. (3.2)
equation (3.2) includes the special case g
ab
=
ab
. The squareroot of the determinant
of g
ab
,
g = det(h
ab
) =: h,
a
=
h
,a
h
, p
a
=
h
i
_
q
a
+
h
,a
2h
_
. (3.3)
17
General Theory
The LaplaceBeltramioperator expressed in the h
ab
reads on M
q
:
M
q
LB
=
_
h
ac
h
bc
2
q
a
q
b
+
_
h
ac
q
a
h
bc
+h
ac
h
bc
q
a
+
h
,a
h
h
ac
h
bc
_
q
b
_
(3.4)
and on M
y
:
M
y
LB
=
1
f
2
a
_
2
y
2
a
+
_
f
b,a
f
b
2f
a,a
_
y
a
_
. (3.5)
With the help of the momentum operators (3.3) we rewrite the Hamiltonian in the
productordering form
H =
h
2
2m
M
q
LB
+ V (q) =
1
2m
h
ac
(q)p
a
p
b
h
bc
(q) +V (q) + V
Prod
(q), (3.6)
with the welldened quantum correction
V
Prod
=
h
2
8m
_
4h
ac
h
bc
,ab
+2h
ac
h
bc
h
,ab
h
+2h
ac
_
h
bc
,b
h
,a
h
+h
bc
,a
h
,b
h
_
h
ac
h
bc
h
,a
h
,b
h
2
_
.
(3.7)
On M
y
the corresponding V
Prod
(y) is given by
V
Prod
(y) =
h
2
8m
1
f
2
a
__
f
b,a
f
b
_
2
4
f
a,aa
f
a
+ 4
f
a,a
f
a
_
2
f
a,a
f
a
f
b,a
f
b
_
+ 2
_
f
b,a
f
b
_
,a
_
. (3.8)
The expressions (3.7) and (3.8) look somewhat circumstantial, so we display a special
case and the connection to the quantum correction V
Weyl
which corresponds to the
Weylordering prescription.
1) Let us assume that
ab
is proportional to the unit tensor, i.e.
ab
= f
2
ab
. Then
V
Prod
(y) simplies into
V
Prod
(y) = h
2
D2
8m
(4 D)f
2
,a
+ 2f f
,aa
f
4
. (3.9)
This implies: Assume that the metric has or can be transformed into the special
form
ab
= f
2
ab
. If the dimension of the space is D = 2, then the quantum
correction V
Prod
vanishes.
2) A comparison between (3.7) and (2.3) gives the connection with the quantum
correction corresponding to the Weylordering prescription:
V
Prod
= V
Weyl
+
h
2
8m
_
2h
ac
h
bc
,ab
h
ac
,a
h
bc
,b
h
ac
,b
h
bc
,a
_
. (3.10)
In the case of equation (3.2) this yields:
V
Prod
(y) = V
Weyl
+
h
2
4m
f
2
a,a
f
a
f
a,aa
f
4
a
(3.11)
18
II.3 ProductOrdering
These equations often simplify practical applications.
Next we have to consider the shorttime matrix element < q
 e
i TH
q
> in or
der to derive the path integral formulation corresponding to our ordering prescription
(3.6).
We proceed similar as in the previous section. We consider the shorttime approxima
tion to the matrix element [ = T/N, g
(j)
= g(q
(j)
)]:
< q
(j)
 e
i H/ h
q
(j1)
>< q
(j)
1 i H/hq
(j1)
>
=
[g
(j)
g
(j1)
]
1
4
(2h)
D
_
e
ipq
(j)
dp
i h
2m
< q
(j)
h
ac
p
a
p
b
h
bc
q
(j1)
>
i
h
< q
(j)
V + V
Prod
q
(j1)
> . (3.12)
Therefore we get for the shorttime matrix element ( 1):
< q
(j)
 e
i H/ h
q
(j1)
>
[g
(j)
g
(j1)
]
1
4
(2h)
D
_
dp
exp
_
i
h
pq
(j)
i
2mh
h
ac
(q
(j)
)h
bc
(q
(j1)
)p
a
p
b
i
h
V (q
(j)
)
i
h
V
Prod
(q
(j)
)
_
.
(3.13)
The choice of the post point q
(j)
in the potential terms is not unique. A pre
point, midpoint or a productformexpansion is also legitimate. However,
changing from one to another formulation does not alter the path integral, because
dierences in the potential terms are of O(), i.e. of O(
2
) in the shorttime Feynman
kernel and therefore do not contribute. The Trotter formula e
i T(A+B)
:= s
lim
N
(e
i TA/N
e
i TB/N
)
N
states that all approximations in equations (3.12) to
(3.13) are valid in the limit N and we get for the Hamiltonian path integral
in the product formdenition [h
(j)
ab
= h
ab
(q
(j)
)]:
K(q
, q
; T) = [g(q
)g(q
)]
1
4
lim
N
_
_
N1
j=1
_
dq
(j)
j=1
dp
(j)
(2h)
D
_
_
exp
_
_
_
i
h
N
j=1
_
pq
(j)
2m
h
ac,(j)
h
bc,(j1)
p
(j)
a
p
(j)
b
V (q
(j)
) V
Prod
(q
(j)
)
_
_
_
_
.
(3.14)
Performing the momentum integrations we get for the Lagrangian path integral
19
General Theory
in the product formdenition: (PF=ProductForm)
K(q
, q
; T)
=
q(t
)=q
_
q(t
)=q
g D
PF
q(t) exp
_
i
h
_
t
_
m
2
h
ac
h
bc
q
a
q
b
V (q) V
Prod
(q)
_
dt
_
:= lim
N
_
m
2 i h
_ND
2
N1
j=1
_
_
g(q
(j)
) dq
(j)
exp
_
_
_
i
h
N
j=1
_
m
2
h
(j)
ac
h
(j1)
bc
q
a,(j)
q
b,(j)
V (q
(j)
) V
Prod
(q
(j)
)
_
_
_
_
. (3.15)
In the last step we have to check that the Schrodinger equation (1.1) can be deduced
from the shorttime kernel of equation (3.15). Because one can always transform from
the qcoordinates to the ycoordinates, which is a linear orthogonal transformation
and thus does not produce any quantum correction in the path integral (3.14) dened
on M
y
, we shall use in the following the representation of equation (3.2). Looking
at the Hamiltonian formulation of the path integral (3.14) we see that the unitary
transformation y = C
1
q changes the metric term p
a
h
ac
h
cb
p
b
p
a
ab
p
b
, i.e. in the
correct feature, the measure dq
(j)
dp
(j)
dy
(j)
dp
(j)
due to the Jacobean J = 1 so
that the Feynman kernel is transformed just in the right manner.
We restrict ourselves to the proof that the shorttime kernels of equations (2.25)
and (3.15) are equivalent, i.e. we have to show ( y = (y
+ y
)/2):
[g(y
)g(y
)]
1
4
_
g( y) exp
_
i m
2h
ab
( y)y
a
y
b
i
h
V ( y) i hV
W
( y)
_
=exp
_
i m
2h
f
a
(y
)f
a
(y
)
2
y
a
i
h
V (y
) i hV
Prod
(y
_
. (3.16)
Clearly, e
i V ( y)/ h
=e
i V (y
)/ h
for the potential term. It suces to show that a
Taylor expansion of the g and the kinetic energy terms on the lefthand side of equation
(3.15) yield an additional potential
V given by
V (y) = V
Prod
(y) V
Weyl
(y) =
h
2
4m
f
2
a,a
(y) f
a
(y)f
a,aa
(y)
f
4
a
(y)
. (3.17)
We consider the gterms on the lefthand side of equation (3.16) and expand them in
a Taylorseries around y
. This gives (
a
= (y
a
y
a
), f
a
(y
) f
a
):
[g(y
)g(y
)]
1
4
_
g( y)
_
1
1
8
f
c
f
c,ab
f
c,a
f
c,b
f
2
c
b
_
. (3.18)
Exploiting the path integral identity (2.30) we get by exponentiating the O()terms,
[g(y
)g(y
)]
1
4
_
g( y) exp
_
i h
8m
f
a
f
a,bb
f
2
a,b
f
2
a
f
2
b
_
. (3.19)
20
II.4 SpaceTime Transformation
Repeating the same procedure for the exponential term gives:
exp
_
i m
2h
ab
( y)
a
b
_
exp
_
i m
2h
f
a
(y
)f
a
(y
)
a
a
_
_
1
i
8m
(f
c
f
c,ab
f
c,a
f
c,b
)
a
c
_
. (3.20)
We use the identity (2.30) to get
exp
_
i m
2h
ab
( y)
a
b
_
exp
_
i m
2h
f
a
(y
)f
a
(y
)
a
a
_
exp
_
i h
8m
f
a
f
a,bb
f
2
a,b
f
2
a
f
2
b
+
i h
4m
f
a
f
a,aa
f
2
a,a
f
4
a
_
. (3.21)
Combining equations (3.20) and (3.21) yields the additional potential
V and
equation (3.16) is proven. Thus we conclude that the path integral (3.15) is well
dened and is the correct path integral corresponding to the Schrodinger equation
(1.1).
A combination of lattice prescriptions were in the metric g
ab
in the kinetic term in
the exponential and in the determinant g dierent lattices are used exist also in the
literature. Let us note the result of McLaughlin and Schulman [70]:
K(q
, q
; T) = lim
N
_
m
2 i h
_
ND/2
N1
j=1
_
_
g(q
(j)
dq
(j)
exp
_
_
_
i
h
N
j=1
_
m
2
g
ab
( q
(j)
)q
(j) a
q
(j) b
U( q
(j)
)
_
_
_
_
(3.22)
with the eective potential
U(q) = V (q)
e
c
A(q) q F(q), (3.23)
A(q) an additional vector potential term and F(q) given by
F(q) = h
2
F
abcd
_
g
ab
g
cd
+g
ac
g
bd
+g
ad
g
bc
_
F
abcd
=
1
48m
_
g
ab,cd
2g
ef
abe
cdf
_ (3.24)
[
abc
=
1
2
(g
ab,c
+ g
ac,b
g
bc,a
)]. According to DOlivio and Torres [21] the eective
potential can be rewritten as
U(q) = V (q)
e
c
A(q) q +
h
2
8m
_
R +g
ab
(
c
ad
d
bc
+
b
c
ac
)
_
. (3.25)
which is up the derivative term the result of Mizrahi [72].
21
General Theory
4. SpaceTime Transformation
Let us consider a onedimensional path integral
K(x
, x
; T) =
x(t
)=x
_
x(t
)=x
Dx(t) exp
_
i
h
_
t
_
m
2
x
2
V (x)
_
dt
_
. (4.1)
It is now assumed that the potential V is so complicated that a direct evaluation of
the path integral is not possible. We want to describe a method how a transformed
path integral can be achieved to calculate K(T) or G(E), respectively, nevertheless.
This method is called spacetime transformation. This technique was originally
developed by Duru and Kleinert [27,28]. It was further evolved by Steiner [90], Pak
and Sokmen [82], Inomata [59], Kleinert [62, 64] and Grosche and Steiner [49]. In the
rigorous lattice derivation of the following formul we follow ourselves [49] and Pak
and Sokmen [82].
Let us start by considering the Legendretransformed of the general onedimensional
Hamiltonian:
H
E
=
h
2
2m
_
d
2
dx
2
+ (x)
d
dx
_
+V (x) E (4.2)
which is hermitean with respect to the scalar product
(f
1
, f
2
) =
_
f
1
(x)f
2
(x)J(x)dx, J(x) = e
_
x
(x
)dx
. (4.3)
Introducing the momentum operator
p
x
=
h
i
_
d
dx
+
1
2
(x)
_
, (x) =
d lnJ(x)
dx
(4.4)
H
E
can be rewritten as
H
E
=
p
2
x
2m
+V (x) +
h
2
8m
[
2
(x) + 2
(x)] E (4.5)
with the corresponding path integral
K
E
(x
, x
; T) = e
i TE/ h
K(x
, x
; T), (4.6)
where K(T) denotes the path integral of equation (4.1).
Let us consider the spacetime transformation
x = F(q), dt = f(x)ds (4.7)
with new coordinate q and new time s. Let G(q) = [F(q)], then
H
E
=
h
2
2m
1
F
2
(q)
_
d
2
dq
2
+
_
G(q)F
(q)
F
(q)
F
(q)
_
d
dq
_
+ V [F(q)] E. (4.8)
22
II.4 SpaceTime Transformation
With the constraint f[F(q)] = F
2
(q) we get for the new Hamiltonian
H = f
H
E
:
H =
h
2
2m
_
d
2
dq
2
+
_
G(q)F
(q)
F
(q)
F
(q)
_
d
dq
_
+f[F(q)][V (F(q)) E]
=
h
2
2m
_
d
2
dq
2
+
(q)
d
dq
_
+f[F(q)][V (F(q)) E],
(4.9)
where
(q) = G(q)F
(q) F
(q)/F
(q)
_
, J(q) =
_
g(q) = e
_
q
(q
)dq
. (4.10)
The Hamiltonian
H expressed in the position q and momentum operator p
q
is
H =
p
q
2m
+ f[F(q)][V (F(q))
E
] + V (q) (4.11)
with the welldened quantum potential
V (q) =
h
2
8m
_
3
_
F
(q)
F
(q)
_
2
2
F
(q)
F
(q)
+
_
G(q)F
(q)
_
2
+ 2G
(q)F
(q)
_
. (4.12)
Note that for G 0, V is proportional to the Schwartz derivative of the transfor
mation F. The path integral corresponding to the Hamiltonian
H is
K(q
, q
; s
) =
q(t
)=q
_
q(t
)=q
Dq(s)
exp
_
i
h
_
s
0
_
m
2
q
2
f[F(q)][V (F(q)) E] V (q)
_
ds
_
. (4.13)
As it is easily checked it is possible to derive from the short time kernel of equation
(4.13) via the time evolution equation
(q
; s) =
_
K(q
, q
; s
(q
; s)dq
(4.14)
the time dependent Schrodinger equation
H
(q; s) = i h
s
) and the
relation between
K(s
, x
; T) =
1
2 i h
_
e
i TE/ h
G(x
, x
; E)dE
G(x
, x
; E) = i[f(x
)f(x
)]
1
4
_
0
K(q
, q
; s
)ds
.
(4.16)
23
General Theory
This we want to justify!
Let us consider the path integral K(T) in its lattice denition
K(x
, x
; T) = lim
N
_
m
2 i h
_
ND/2
N1
j=1
_
dx
(j)
exp
_
_
_
i
h
N
j=1
_
m
2
(x
(j)
x
(j1)
)
2
V ( x
(j)
)
_
_
_
_
. (4.17)
We consider a Ddimensional path integral. To transform the coordinates x into
the coordinates q we use the midpoint prescription expansion method. It reads that
one has to expand any dynamical quantity in question F(q) which is dened on the
points q
(j)
and q
(j1)
of the j
th
interval in the lattice version about the midpoints
q
(j)
=
1
2
(q
(j)
+ q
(j1)
) maintaining terms up to order (q
(j)
q
(j1)
)
3
. This gives:
F(q
(j)
) F(q
(j)
) F(q
(j1)
) = F
_
q
(j)
+
q
(j)
2
_
F
_
q
(j)
q
(j)
2
_
= q
(j)
m
F(q)
q
m
q= q
(j)
+
1
24
q
(j)
m
q
(j)
n
q
(j)
k
3
F(q)
q
m
q
n
q
k
q= q
(j)
+ . . . .
(4.18)
Introducing the abbreviations
F
(j)
,m
F(q)
q
m
q= q
(j)
, F
(j)
,mnk
3
F(q)
q
m
q
n
q
k
q= q
(j)
(4.19)
we get therefore
2
F
(j)
=
_
q
(j)
m
F
(j)
,m
+
1
24
q
(j)
m
q
(j)
n
(j)
k
F
(j)
,mnk
_
2
q
(j)
m
q
(j)
n
F
(j)
,m
F
(j)
,n
+
1
12
q
(j)
m
q
(j)
n
q
(j)
k
q
(j)
l
F
(j)
,m
F
(j)
,nkl
=q
(j)
m
q
(j)
n
F
(j)
,m
F
(j)
,n
+
1
12
_
i h
m
_
2
F
(j)
,m
F
(j)
,nkl
F
1
mnkl
(q
(j)
) (4.20)
according to equation (2.30) with the abbreviation
F
1
mnkl
(q
(j)
) = (F
(j)
,m
F
(j)
,n
)
1
(F
(j)
,k
F
(j)
,l
)
1
+ (F
(j)
,m
F
(j)
,k
)
1
(F
(j)
,l
F
(j)
,n
)
1
+ (F
(j)
,m
F
(j)
,l
)
1
(F
(j)
,k
F
(j)
,n
)
1
. (4.21)
Furthermore we have to transform the measure. Because
N1
j=1
dx
(j)
=
N1
j=1
F(q
(j)
)
q
(j)
dq
(j)
N1
j=1
F
;q
(q
(j)
)dq
(j)
(4.22)
24
II.4 SpaceTime Transformation
does not have a symmetric look, we must expand about q
(j)
. We get:
N1
j=1
dx
(j)
=
_
F
;q
(q
)F
;q
(q
1/2
N1
j=1
dq
(j)
N
j=1
_
F
;q
(q
(j)
)F
;q
(q
(j1
)
1
2
_
F
;q
(q
)F
;q
(q
1/2
N1
j=1
dq
(j)
N
j=1
F
;q
( q
(j)
)
_
1
1
8
_
F
;q,m
( q
(j)
)F
;q,n
( q
(j)
)
F
2
;q
( q
(j)
)
F
;q,mn
( q
(j)
)
F
;q
( q
(j)
)
_
q
(j)
m
q
(j)
n
_
=
_
F
;q
(q
)F
;q
(q
1
2
N1
j=1
dq
(j)
N
j=1
F
;q
( q
(j)
)
exp
_
i h
8m
(F
(j)
,m
F
(j)
,n
)
1
_
F
;q,m
( q
(j)
)F
;q,n
( q
(j)
)
F
2
;q
( q
(j)
)
F
;q,mn
( q
(j)
)
F
;q
( q
(j)
)
__
(4.23)
Thus we have the coordinate transformed path integral
K(q
, q
; T)
= [F
;q
(q
)F
;q
(q
)]
1/2
lim
N
_
m
2 i h
_
ND/2
N1
j=1
_
dq
(j)
j=1
F
;q
( q
(j)
) exp
_
i
h
_
m
2
q
(j)
m
q
(j)
n
F
,m
( q
(j)
)F
,n
( q
(j)
) V ( q
(j)
)
h
2
8m
(F
(j)
,m
F
(j)
,n
)
1
_
F
;q,m
( q
(j)
)F
;q,n
( q
(j)
)
F
2
;q
( q
(j)
)
F
;q,mn
( q
(j)
)
F
;q
( q
(j)
)
_
h
2
8m
F
(j)
,m
F
(j)
,nkl
F
1
mnkl
(q
(j)
)
___
(4.24)
This path integral has the canonical form (2.24). In order to see this note that
the factor F
,m
( q
(j)
)F
,n
( q
(j)
) in the dynamical term can be interpreted as a metric
g
nm
appearing in an eective Lagrangian. Thus we can rewrite the transformed
Lagrangian in terms of this metric (Gervais and Jevicki [38]): Firstly, we have
F
;q
(q) =
_
det(g
nm
(q))
_
g(q). In the expansion of the determinant about the
midpoints we then get
[F
;q
(q
(j)
)F
;q
(q
(j1
)
1/2
_
q( q
(j)
)
_
1 +
1
16
_
g
mn
( q
(j)
)g
mn,kl
+g
mn
,k
( q
(j)
)g
mn,l
( q
(j)
)
_
q
(j)
k
q
(j)
k
_
. (4.25)
Using now successively the identities
g
,l
(q)
g(q)
= g
mn
(q)g
mn,l
(q), F
m
,kl
(q) =
m
kl
(q)F
m
,l
(q),
m
ml,k
(q) =
1
2
_
g
,l
(q)
g(q)
_
,k
(4.26)
25
General Theory
we can cast the quantum potential into the form
V (q) =
h
2
8m
g
mn
(q)
k
lm
(q)
l
km
(q) (4.27)
which is just the Weylordering quantum potential without curvature term. In the
present case the curvature vanishes since we started in at Euclidean space which
remains at during the transformation.
In particular equation (4.24) takes in the onedimensional case the form [F
dF/dq]:
K(q
, q
; T) = [F
(q
)F
(q
)]
1
2
lim
N
_
m
2 i h
_
N/2
N1
j=1
_
dq
(j)
j=1
F
( q
(j)
) exp
_
i
h
_
m
2h
q
(j)
m
q
(j)
n
F
2
( q
(j)
) V ( q
(j)
)
h
2
8m
F
2
( q
(j)
)
F
4
( q
(j)
)
__
(4.28)
which is the same result as taking for D = 1 in V
Weyl
the metric tensor g
ab
= F
2
.
The innitesimal generator of the corresponding timeevolution operator is
H
E
. To
proceed further we perform a time transformation according to
dt = f(s)ds, s
= s(t
) = 0, s
= s(t
) (4.29)
and we make the choice f = F
2
. Translating this transformation into the discrete
notation requires special care. In accordance with the midpoint prescription we must
rst symmetrize over the interval (j, j 1) to prefer neither of the endpoints over the
other, i.e.
t
(j)
= = s
(j)
F
(q
(j)
)F
(q
(j1)
), s
(j)
= s
(j)
s
(j1)
(j)
. (4.30)
Expanding about midpoints yields
(j)
F
2
( q
(j)
)
_
1 +
2
q
(j)
4
_
F
( q
(j)
)
F
( q
(j)
)
_
F
( q
(j)
)
F
( q
(j)
)
_
2
__
. (4.31)
Insertion yields for each j
th
term [identify V (x
(j)
) V [F(q
(j)
)] V (q
(j)
)]
_
m
2 i h
_N
2
N1
j=1
dx
(j)
j=1
exp
_
i
h
_
m
2
2
x
(j)
V (x
(j)
) + E
__
=
N1
j=1
F
(q
(j)
)dq
(j)
N
j=1
_
m
2 i h
_1
2
exp
_
i
h
_
m
2
_
F
2
( q
(j)
)
2
q
(j)
+
1
12
F
( q
(j)
)F
( q
(j)
)
4
q
(j)
_
V (x
(j)
) +E
__
26
II.4 SpaceTime Transformation
=
_
F
(q
)F
(q
)
_
1
2
N1
j=1
dq
(j)
N
j=1
_
m
2 i
(j)
h
_1
2
j=1
exp
__
i
h
_
m
2
(j)
_
1 +
2
q
(j)
4
_
F
( q
(j)
)
F
( q
(j)
)
_
F
( q
(j)
)
F
( q
(j)
)
_
2
__
1
2
q
(j)
+
4
q
(j)
12
F
( q
(j)
)
F
( q
(j)
)
_
(j)
F
2
( q
(j)
)
_
V (q
(j)
) E
_
___
.
=
_
F
(q
)F
(q
)
_
1
2
_
m
2 i h
_N
2
N1
j=1
dq
(j)
exp
__
i
h
_
m
2
2
q
(j)
(j)
F
2
(q
(j)
)
_
V (q
(j)
) E
_
ih
8m
_
3
_
F
(q
(j)
)
F
(q
(j)
)
_
2
2
F
(q
(j)
)
F
(q
(j)
)
____
. (4.32)
Let us assume that the constraint
_
s
0
dsf[F(q(s))] = T (4.33)
has for all admissible path a unique solution s
, x
; E) = i
_
0
dT e
i TE/ h
K(x
, x
; T)
K(x
, x
; T) =
1
2 i h
_
dE e
i TE/ h
G(x
, x
; E).
(4.34)
This incorporation is far from being trivial, in particular the fact that the new time
slicing
(j)
is treated in the same way as the old timeslicing , i.e.
(j)
is considered
as being xed, but can however be justied in a more comprehensive way, see e.g. [6,
35, 59]. We now observe that G(E) can be written e.g. in the following ways [62]:
G(x
, x
; E) = f(x
)
_
0
< x
 e
i s
f(x)(HE)/ h
x
> ds
(4.35a)
= f(x
)
_
0
< x
 e
i s
(HE)f(x)/ h
x
> ds
(4.35b)
=
_
f(x
)f(x
)
_
0
< x
 e
i s
f(x)(HE)
f(x)/ h
x
> ds
.
(4.35c)
The last line give for the shorttime matrix element in the usual manner
<x
(j)
 e
i
(j)
f
1
2 (x)(HE)f
1
2 (x)/ h
x
(j1)
>
27
General Theory
< x
(j)
1 i
(j)
f
1
2
(x)(H E)f
1
2
(x)/hx
(j1)
>
=< x
(j)
x
(j1)
>
i
(j)
h
_
f(x
(j)
)f(x
(j)
) < x
(j)
H Ex
(j1)
>
=< F(q
(j)
)F(q
(j1)
) >
i
(j)
h
_
f[F(q
(j)
)]f[F(q
(j)
)] < F(q
(j)
)
H
E
F(q
(j1)
) >
=< q
(j)
q
(j1)
>
i
h
< q
(j)

Hq
(j1)
>
=
1
2
_
dp
q
exp
_
i
h
p
q
q
(j)
i
2mh
p
2
q
i
h
F
2
( q
(j)
)(V ( q
(j)
) E)
i
h
V ( q
(j)
)
_
=
_
m
2 i h
_1
2
exp
_
i m
2h
2
q
(j)
h
F
2
( q
(j)
)(V ( q
(j)
) E)
h
V ( q
(j)
)
_
,
(4.36)
where the welldened quantum potential V is given by
V (q) =
h
2
8m
_
3
F
(q)
F
(q)
2
_
F
(q)
F
(q)
_
2
_
. (4.37)
Note that this quantum potential has the form of a Schwartzderivative. This
procedure justies our symmetrization prescription of equations (4.30). Thus we arrive
nally at the transformation formul:
K(x
, x
; T) =
1
2 i h
_
dE e
i TE/ h
G[F(q
), F(q
); E]
G[F(q
), F(q
); E] = i[F
(q
)F
(q
)]
1
2
_
0
ds
K(q
, q
; s
)
(4.38)
where the path integral
K(s
) is given by
K(q
, q
; s
) = lim
N
_
m
2 i h
_1
2
N1
j=1
_
dq
(j)
exp
_
_
_
i
h
N
j=1
_
m
2
2
q
(j)
F
2
( q
(j)
)(V ( q
(j)
) E) V ( q
(j)
)
_
_
_
_
. (4.39)
This is exactly the path integral (4.13) and thus we have proven it. Note that only
for D = 1 we have the simple transformation property
i m
2
2
x
(j)
i m
2
2
q
(j)
. (4.40)
For higher dimensional problem this may only possible for one coordinate kinetic term.
Anyway, the requirement for higher dimensional problems are
F
;q
= F
,m
F
,n
(4.41)
28
II.5 Separation of Variables
for at least one pair (m, n) (1, . . . , D).
Finally we consider a pure time transformation in a path integral. We consider
equation (4.35c), i.e.
G(x
, x
; E) =
_
f(x
)f(x
)
_
0
ds
< q
 e
i s
f (HE)
f/ h
q
>, (4.42)
where we assume that the Hamiltonian H is product ordered. Then
G(x
, x
; E)
=
_
f(x
)f(x
)
_
0
ds
N1
j=1
_
dq
(j)
N
j=1
< q
(j)
 e
i
f (HE)
f/ h
q
(j1)
>
=
_
f(x
)f(x
)
(g
)
1
4
_
0
ds
lim
N
N1
j=1
_
dq
(j)
j=1
_
dp
(j)
(2h)
D
exp
_
i
h
_
p
(j)
q
(j)
_
f(q
(j)
)f(q
(j1)
)
_
h
ac
(q
(j1)
)h
bc
(q
(j)
)
2m
p
(j)
a
p
(j)
b
+V (q
(j)
) + V
Prod
(q
(j)
) E
___
= (f
)
1
2
(1D/2)
lim
N
_
m
2 i h
_
ND/2
N1
j=1
_
g(q
(j)
)
f
D
(q
(j)
)
dq
(j)
exp
_
_
_
i
h
N
j=1
_
m
2
h
ac
(q
(j1)
)h
bc
(q
(j)
)
_
f(q
(j1)
)f(q
(j)
)
q
a,(j)
q
b,(j)
i f(q
(j)
)
_
V (q
(j)
) + V
Prod
(q
(j)
) E
_
__
= (f
)
1
2
(1D/2)
_
0
K(q
, q
; s
)ds
(4.43)
with the path integral
K(q
, q
; s
) =
q(t
)=q
_
q(t
)=q
_
g D
PF
q(t)
exp
_
i
h
_
s
0
_
m
2
h
ac
h
cb
q
a
q
b
f
_
V (q) + V
Prod
(q) E
_
_
ds
_
. (4.44)
Here denote
h
ac
= h
ac
/
f and
g = det(
h
ac
) and equation (4.44) is of the canonical
product form. Note that for D = 2 the prefactor is one.
29
General Theory
5. Separation of Variables
Let us assume that the potential problem V (x) has an exact solution according to
x(t
)=x
_
x(t
)=x
Dx(t) exp
_
i
h
_
t
_
m
2
x
2
V (x)
_
dt
_
=
_
dE
e
i E
T/ h
(x
(x
).
(5.1)
Here
_
dE
, z
, x
, x
; T)
=
z(t
)=z
_
z(t
)=z
f
d
(z)
d
i=1
g
i
(z)Dz
i
(t)
x(t
)=x
_
x(t
)=x
k=1
Dx
k
(t)
exp
_
_
_
i
h
_
t
_
_
m
2
_
_
d
i=1
g
i
(z) z
2
i
+ f
2
(z)
d
k=1
x
2
k
_
_
_
V (x)
f
2
(z)
+W(z) + W(z)
_
_
_
dt
_
_
_
= lim
N
_
m
2 i h
_ND
2
N1
j=1
_
f
d
(z
(j)
)
d
i=1
g
i
(z
(j)
)dz
(j)
i
_
d
k=1
dx
(j)
k
exp
_
_
_
i
h
N
j=1
_
_
m
2
_
_
d
i=1
g
i
(z
(j1)
)g
i
(z
(j)
)
2
z
(j)
i
+ f(z
(j1)
)f(z
(j)
)
d
k=1
2
x
(j)
k
_
_
_
V (x
(j)
)
f
2
(z
(j)
)
+ W(z
(j)
) + W(z
(j)
)
_
_
_
_
_
_
. (5.2)
Here (z, x) (z
i
, x
k
) (i = 1, . . . , d
; k = 1, . . . , d, d
+ d = D) denote a Ddimensional
coordinate system, g
i
and f the corresponding metric terms, and W the quantum
potential. For simplicity I assume that the metric tensor g
ab
involved has only
diagonal elements, i.e. g
ab
= diag(g
2
1
(z), g
2
2
(z), . . . , g
2
d
(z), f
2
(z), . . . , f
2
(z)]. Of course,
det(g
ab
) = f
2d
i=1
g
2
i
f
2d
G(z). The indices i and k will be omitted in the following.
We perform the time transformation
s =
_
t
t
d
f
2
[z()]
, s
= s(t
), s(t
) = 0, (5.3)
where the lattice interpretation reads /[f(z
(j1)
)f(z
(j)
)] =
(j)
. Of course, we
identify z(t) z[s(t)] and x(t) x[s(t)]. The transformation formul for a pure time
transformation are now
K(z
, z
, x
, x
; T) =
1
2 i h
_
dE e
i ET/ h
G(z
, z
, x
, x
; E) (5.4)
30
II.5 Separation of Variables
G(z
, z
, x
, x
; E) = i[f(z
)f(z
)]
1D/2
_
0
ds
K(z
, z
, x
, x
; s
),
(5.5)
where the transformed path integral
K(s
) is given by
K(z
, z
, x
, x
; s
)
=
z(s
)=z
_
z(0)=z
_
G(z)
f
2d
(z)
Dz(s)
x(s
)=x
_
x(0)=x
Dx(s)
exp
_
i
h
_
s
0
_
m
2
_
g
2
(z)
f
2
(z)
z
2
+ x
2
_
V (x) f
2
(z)
_
W(z) + W(z)
_
+ f
2
(z)E
_
ds
_
=
_
dE
e
i E
/ h
(x
(x
)
K(z
, z
; s
), (5.6)
with the remaining path integration
K(z
, z
; s
) =
z(s
)=z
_
z(0)=z
_
G(z)
f
2d
(z)
Dz(s)
exp
_
i
h
_
s
0
_
m
2
g
2
(z)
f
2
(z)
z
2
f
2
(z)
_
W(z) + W(z)
_
+f
2
(z)E
_
ds
_
. (5.7)
Of course, in the path integrals (5.6,5.7) the same lattice formulation is assumed as in
the path integral (5.2). Note the dierence in comparison with a combined spacetime
transformation where a factor [f(z
)f(z
)]
1/4
would instead appear. We also see that
for D = 2 the prefactor is identically one. We perform a second time transformation
in
K(s
= s
(5.8)
with the transformation on the lattice interpreted as
(j)
=
(j)
f(z
(j1)
)f(z
(j)
).
Therefore we obtain the transformation formul
K(z
, z
; s
) =
1
2 i h
_
dE
e
i E
/ h
G(z
, z
; E
) (5.9)
G(z
, z
; E
) = i[f(z
)f(z
)]
Dd
2
1
_
0
d
e
i E
/ h
K(z
, z
)
(5.10)
with the transformed path integral given by
K(z
, z
) =
z(
)=z
_
z(0)=z
_
G(z) Dz()
exp
_
i
h
_
0
_
m
2
g
2
(z) z
2
W(z) W(z) +
E
f
2
(z)
_
d
_
. (5.11)
31
General Theory
Plugging all the relevant formul into equation (5.5) yields
K(z
, z
, x
, x
; T) = [f(z
)f(z
)]
D/2
_
dE
(x
(x
1
2h
_
0
d
dE e
i E(
T)/ h
1
2h
_
dE
_
0
ds
e
i s
(E
+E
)/ h
z(
)=z
_
z(0)=z
_
G(z) Dz() exp
_
i
h
_
0
_
m
2
g
2
(z) z
2
W(z) W(z) +
E
f
2
(z)
_
d
_
.
(5.12)
The d
T, whereas the dE
ds
integration can be
evaluated by giving E
, z
, x
, x
; T) = [f(z
)f(z
)]
D/2
_
dE
(x
(x
z(t
)=z
_
z(t
)=z
_
G(z) Dz(t) exp
_
i
h
_
t
_
m
2
g
2
(z) z
2
W(z) W(z)
E
f
2
(z)
_
dt
_
.
(5.13)
Note that this result can be short handed interpreted by inserting
_
m
2 i
(j)
h
_
D/2
exp
_
i
h
_
m
2
(j)
2
x
(j)
(j)
V (x
(j)
)
__
=
_
dE
(j) e
i E
(j)
(j)
/ h
(j)
(x
(j1)
)
(j) (x
(j)
) (5.14)
with
(j)
= /[f(z
(j1)
)f(z
(j)
)] for all j
th
and applying the orthonormality of the
in each j
th
path integration. Equation (5.14) describes therefore a shortcut to
establish equation (5.12) instead of performing a time transformation back and forth.
32
III.1 The Free Particle
III Important Examples
In this Chapter I present some of the most important path integral solutions which
are
1) The free particle as a simple example.
2) The harmonic oscillator in its basic form, where we allow in addition a time
dependent frequency.
3) Path integration in polar coordinates. We shall discuss the various features of
properly dened path integrals including the Besselian functional measure.
In particular the (timedependent) radial harmonic oscillator will be exactly
evaluated.
4) The Coulomb potential.
1. The Free Particle
For warming up we calculate the path integral for the free particle in an Ddimensional
Euclidean space. From the representation
K(x
, x
; T)
=
x(t
)=x
_
x(t
)=x
Dx(t) exp
_
i m
2 h
_
t
x
2
dt
_
= lim
N
_
m
2 i h
_ND
2
N1
j=1
_
dx
(j)
exp
_
_
i m
2h
N
j=1
_
x
(j)
x
(j1)
_
2
_
_
.
(1.1)
it is obvious that the various integrations separate into a Ddimensional product. All
integrals are Gaussian. Starting with ( = 1, . . . , D):
K
N=2
(x
(2)
, x
(0)
; 2)
=
_
m
2 i h
_
_
dx
(1)
exp
_
m
2 i h
(x
(2)
x
(1)
)
2
m
2 i h
(x
(1)
x
(0)
)
2
_
=
_
m
4 i h
exp
_
m
4 i h
(x
(2)
x
(0)
)
2
_
, (1.2)
it is easy to show that
K
N
(x
(N)
, x
(0)
; N) =
_
m
2 i hN
exp
_
m
2 i hN
(x
(N)
x
(0)
)
2
_
. (1.3)
33
Important Examples
Thus we get in the limit N (note N = T):
K(x
, x
; T) =
_
m
2 i hT
_
D/2
exp
_
i m
2 hT
(x
)
2
_
=
1
(2)
D
_
exp
_
i p(x
) i T
hp
2
2m
_
dp.
(1.4)
From this representation the normalized wavefunctions and the energy spectrum can
be read o (p R
D
):
(x) =
e
i px
(2)
D/2
, E
p
=
p
2
h
2
2m
(x R
D
) (1.5)
which is the known result.
The corresponding energydependent Green function is given by (D = 1):
G
(1)
(x
, x
; E) = i
_
0
K(x
, x
; T) e
i ET/ h
dT =
_
m
2E
exp
_
i
x

h
2mE
_
.
(1.6)
For the Ddimensional case we obtain
G
(D)
(x
, x
; E)
= 2 i
_
m
2 i h
_
D/2
_
m
2E
x

2
_1
2
(1D/2)
K
1D/2
_
i
x

2
h
2mE
_
(1.7)
= i
_
m
2 h
_
D/2
_
m
2
2E
x

2
_1
2
(1D/2)
H
(1)
1D/2
_
x

h
2mE
_
, (1.8)
where use has been made of the integral representation [40, p.340]
_
0
dt t
1
exp
_
a
4t
pt
_
= 2
_
a
4p
_
2
K
ap ), (1.9)
and K
(z) =
i
2
e
i /2
H
(1)
(i z), K
1
2
(z) =
_
/2z e
z
.
2. The Harmonic Oscillator
After this easy task we proceed to the path integral calculation of the harmonic
oscillator. We consider the simple onedimensional case with the Lagrangian
L[x, x] =
m
2
x
2
c(t)
2
x
2
+ b(t)x x e(t)x (2.1)
34
III.2 The Harmonic Oscillator
Here we assume that the various coecients may be timedependent. The path integral
has the form
K(x
, x
; t
, t
) =
x(t
)=x
_
x(t
)=x
Dx(t) e
i
h
S[x]
=
x(t
)=x
_
x(t
)=x
Dx(t) e
i
h
_
t
L[x, x]dt
(2.2)
In this quadratic Lagrangian, of course, an ordering problem appears. This is due to
the stochastic nature of the path integral, the timeintegral in the exponent is not
a Riemannintegral but a so called Itointegral. This we have already discussed in
chapter II. The ordering ambiguity appears in the b(t)term, where we have in the
corresponding Hamiltonian a pxterm. The consequence is that we have to use the
midpoint formulation, i.e. ( x
(j)
=
1
2
(x
(j)
+ x
(j1)
), and c
(j)
= c(t
(j)
), etc., see also
Schulmans book [86]):
K(x
, x
; t
, t
)
=
x(t
)=x
_
x(t
)=x
Dx(t) exp
_
i
h
_
t
_
m
2
x
2
c(t)
2
x
2
+b(t)x x e(t)x
_
dt
_
= lim
N
_
m
2 i h
_N
2
N1
j=1
_
dx
(j)
exp
_
_
_
i
h
N
j=1
_
m
2
_
x
(j)
x
(j1)
_
2
c
(j)
2
( x
(j)
)
2
+b
(j)
x
(j)
_
x
(j)
x
(j1)
_
e
(j)
x
(j)
_
_
_
_
.
(2.3)
In the following we use the notations in equations (2.2) and (2.3) as synonymous. Let
us expand the path x(t) about the classical path x
Cl
(t), i.e.:
x(t) = x
Cl
(t) +y(t),
where y(t) denotes a uctuating path about the classical one. The classical path
obeys, of course, the Euler Lagrange equations:
L[x
Cl
, x
Cl
]
x
Cl
=
d
dt
L[x
Cl
, x
Cl
]
x
Cl
L[x
Cl
, x
Cl
]
x
Cl
= 0, x
Cl
(t
) = x
, x
Cl
(t
) = x
Cl
.
(2.4)
Expanding we obtain for the action
S[x] = S[x
Cl
] +
1
2
2
S[x]
x
2
x=x
Cl
y
2
= S[x
Cl
(t
), x
Cl
(t
)] +
_
t
_
m
2
y
2
c
2
y
2
+ by y
_
dt.
(2.5)
35
Important Examples
The linear functional variation vanishes due to the EulerLagrange equations (2.4).
For the path integral we now nd
K(x
; t
, t
) = exp
_
i
h
S[x
Cl
(t
), x
Cl
(t
)]
_
F(t
, t
),
F(t
, t
) =
y(t
)=0
_
y(t
)=0
Dy(t) exp
_
i m
2 h
_
t
_
y
2
2
(t)y
2
_
dt
_
.
(2.6)
Here we have used the abbreviations m
2
(t) = c(t) +
b(t), y
= y(t
) and y
= y(t
).
Now
F(t
, t
) = lim
N
F
N
= lim
N
_
m
2 i h
_N
2
_
dy
(1)
_
dy
(N1)
exp
_
_
_
m
2 i h
N
j=1
_
(y
(j)
y
(j1)
)
2
(j) 2
y
(j) 2
_
_
_
_
(2.7)
Let us introduce a N 1dimensional vector z = (x
1
, . . . , x
N1
)
T
and the (N 1)
(N 1) matrix B:
B =
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
2
(1) 2
1 . . . 0 0
1 2
2
(2) 2
. . . 0 0
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
0 0 . . . 2
2
(N2) 2
1
0 0 . . . 1 2
2
(N1) 2
_
_
_
_
_
_
. (2.8)
Thus we get
F
N
=
_
m
2 i h
_N
2
_
d
N1
z exp
_
m
2 i h
z
T
Bz
_
=
_
m
2 i hdet B
_1
2
. (2.9)
Therefore
F(t
, t
) =
_
m
2 i hf(t
, t
)
_1
2
, where f(t
, t
) = lim
N
det B. (2.10)
Our nal task is to determine det B. Let us consider the j j matrix
B
(j)
=
_
_
_
_
_
_
2
2
(1) 2
1 . . . 0 0
1 2
2
(2) 2
. . . 0 0
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
0 0 . . . 2
2
(j1) 2
1
0 0 . . . 1 2
2
(j) 2
_
_
_
_
_
_
(2.11)
36
III.2 The Harmonic Oscillator
One can show that the following recursion relations holds:
det B
(j+1)
= (2
2
(j+1) 2
) det B
(j)
det B
(j1)
with det B
(1)
= 2
2
(1) 2
and det B
(0)
= 1. Let us dene g
(j)
= det B
(j)
, then we
have
g
(j+1)
2g
(j)
+ g
(j1)
=
2
(j+1) 2
g
(j)
.
Turning to a continuous notation we nd for the function g(t) = f(t, t
) a dierential
equation:
g(t) +
2
(t)g(t) = 0, with g(t
) = 0, g(t
) = 1. (2.12)
The two last equation follow from g(t
) = g
0
= lim
0
det B
(0)
and g(t
) = lim
0
_
g(t
+ ) g(t
/ = lim
0
(det B
(1)
det B
(0)
) = 1. Finally we have to insert
g(t
) = f(t
, t
= T.
The case of the usual harmonic oscillator with (t) = (timeindependent) is given
by
g(t) =
1
sin T.
To get the path integral solution for the harmonic oscillator we must calculate its
classical action. It is a straightforward calculation to show that it is given by:
S[x
Cl
(t
), x
Cl
(t
)] =
m
2 sin T
_
(x
2
Cl
+x
2
Cl
) cos T 2x
Cl
x
Cl
_
. (2.13)
and we have for the Feynman kernel:
K(x
, x
; T) =
_
m
2 i hsin T
_1
2
exp
_
m
2 i h
_
(x
2
+x
2
) cot T 2
x
sin T
__
. (2.14)
By the use of the Mehlerformula [31, Vol.III, p.272]:
e
(x
2
+y
2
)/2
n=0
1
n!
_
z
2
_
n
H
n
(x)H
n
(y) =
1
1 z
2
exp
_
4xyz (x
2
+ y
2
)(1 +z
2
)
2(1 z
2
)
_
,
(2.15)
where H
n
denote the Hermitepolynomials, we can expand the Feynman kernel
according to (identify x
_
m/hx
, y
_
m/hx
and z = e
i T
):
K(x
, x
; T) =
n=0
e
i TE
n
/ h
n
(x
)
n
(x
) (2.16)
with energyspectrum and wavefunctions:
E
n
= h(n +
1
2
), (2.17)
n
(x) =
_
m
2
2n
hn!
2
_1
4
H
n
__
m
h
x
_
exp
_
m
2 h
x
2
_
. (2.18)
37
Important Examples
Equation (2.14) is as it stands only valid for 0 < T < . Let us investigate it for
larger times. Let
T =
n
+ , with n N
0
; 0 < < / (2.19)
then we have sin T = e
i n
sin , cos T = e
i n
cos and equation (2.14) becomes
K(x
, x
; T) =
_
m
2hsin
_1
2
exp
_
i
2
_
1
2
+ n
_
+
i m
2 hsinT
_
(x
2
+x
2
) cos T 2x
_
_
(2.20)
which is the formula for the propagator with the Maslov correction (note sin =
 sinT). Now let 0, i.e. we consider the propagator at caustics. We obtain
K
_
x
, x
;
n
_
= lim
0
_
m
2 i h
_1
2
exp
_
i n
2
+
i m
2 h
_
(x
2
+ x
2
) 2 e
i n
x
_
_
= lim
a0
1
a
exp
_
1
a
2
(x
(1)
n
x
)
2
i
n
2
_
= exp
_
i
2
n
_
(x
(1)
n
x
). (2.21)
Let us nally determine the energy dependent Green function. We use the integral
representation [40, p.729], a
1
> a
2
, (
1
2
+ ) > 0):
_
0
coth
2
x
2
exp
_
a
1
+ a
2
2
t cosh x
_
I
2
(t
a
1
a
2
sinh x)dx
=
(
1
2
+ )
t
a
1
a
2
(1 + 2)
W
,
(a
1
t)M
,
(a
2
t). (2.22)
Here W
,
(z) and M
,
(z) denote Whittakerfunctions. We reexpress e
x
=
_
x/2
[I1
2
(x) +I
1
2
(x)] apply equation (2.22) for = E/2 h and use some relations between
Whittaker and parabolic cylinderfunctions to obtain
G(x
, x
; E) =
1
2
_
m
h
_
1
2
E
h
_
D
1
2
+
E
h
_
_
2m
h
(x
+ x
+x
)
_
D
1
2
+
E
h
_
_
2m
h
(x
+x
x
)
_
.
(2.23)
From this representation we can recover by means of the expansion for the function
(z) =
n=0
(1)
n
n!(z + n)
+
_
1
e
t
t
z1
dt
38
III.2 The Harmonic Oscillator
and some relations of the parabolic cylinderfunctions and the Hermite polynomials,
the wavefunctions of equation (2.18).
Let us note that we can use equations (2.14, 2.23) to obtain recursion relations for
the Feynman kernel and the Green function, respectively, of the harmonic oscillator
in D dimensions. Let x R
n
and dene =
x
2
+
x
2
, = x
, then
K
(D)
(x
, x
; T) =
1
2
K
(D2)
(x
, x
; T)
=
1
2
e
i T
_
m
h
2
_
K
(D2)
(x
, x
; T). (2.24)
For the Green functions this gives
G
(D)
(x
, x
; E)
G
(D)
(; E) (2.25)
G
(D)
(; E) =
1
2
G
(D2)
(; E) (2.26)
G
(D)
(; E) =
1
2
_
m
h
2
G
(D2)
(; E h) (2.27)
Introducing furthermore =
1
2
(x
+x
 + x
), =
1
2
(x
+x
 x
) we
obtain for D = 1, 3, 5 . . . .
G
(D)
(x
, x
; E) =
1
2
_
m
h
_
1
2
E
h
__
1
2
_
D1
2
_
1
2
_
__
D1
2
D
1
2
+
E
h
_
_
2m
h
_
D
1
2
+
E
h
_
_
2m
h
_
,
(2.28)
respectively,
G
(D)
(x
, x
; E) =
1
2
_
m
h
_
D
2
E
h
__
1
2
_
D1
2
_
1
2
_
_
+
m
h
_
D1
2
D
D
2
+
E
h
_
_
2m
h
_
D
D
2
+
E
h
_
_
2m
h
_
.
(2.29)
Let us note that the most general solution for the general quadratic Lagrangian is due
to Grosjean and Goovaerts [52, 53].
39
Important Examples
3. The Radial Path Integral
3.1. The General Radial Path Integral
Radial path integrals have been rst discussed by Edwards and Gulyaev [30] and
Arthurs [4]. Edwards and Gulyaev discussed the two and threedimensional cases,
Arthurs concentrated on D = 2. Further progress have been made by Peak and
Inomata [84] who calculated the path integral for the radial harmonic oscillator
including some simple applications. See also [49] for the ordering problematics
which give rise to the various quantum potentials in the formulation of the radial
path integral. In this section we derive the path integral for Ddimensional polar
coordinates. We follow in our line of reasoning references [49] and [92], where these
features have been rst discussed in their full detail. Similar topics can be also found
in Bohm and Junker [5] from a group theoretic approach. We will get an expansion
in the angular momentum l, where the angle dependent part can be integrated out
and a radial dependent part is left over: the radial path integral. We discuss some
properties of the radial path integral and show that it possible to get from the short
time kernel the radial Schrodinger equation.
The path integral in Ddimensions has the form:
K
(D)
(x
, x
; T)
=
x(t
)=x
_
x(t
)=x
Dx(t) exp
_
i
h
_
t
_
m
2
x
2
V (x)
_
dt
_
= lim
N
_
m
2 i h
_
ND/2
_
dx
(1)
_
dx
(N1)
exp
_
_
_
i
h
N
j=1
_
m
2h
(x
(j)
x
(j1)
)
2
V (x
(j)
)
_
_
_
_
. (3.1)
Now let V (x) = V (x) and introduce Ddimensional polar coordinates [31, Vol.II,
Chapter IX]:
x
1
= r cos
1
x
2
= r sin
1
cos
2
x
3
= r sin
1
sin
2
cos
3
. . .
x
D1
= r sin
1
sin
2
. . . sin
D2
cos
x
D
= r sin
1
sin
2
. . . sin
D2
sin
_
_
(3.2)
40
III.3.1 The Radial Path Integral
where 0
( = 1, . . . , D 2), 0 2, r =
_
D
=1
x
2
_
1/2
. Therefore
V (x) = V (r). We have to use the addition theorem:
cos
(1,2)
= cos
(1)
1
cos
(2)
1
+
D2
m=1
cos
(1)
m+1
cos
(2)
m+1
m
n=1
sin
(1)
n
sin
(2)
n
+
D1
n=1
sin
(1)
n
sin
(2)
n
, (3.3)
where
(1,2)
is the angle between two Ddimensional vectors x
(1)
and x
(2)
so that
x
(1)
x
(2)
= r
(1)
r
(2)
cos
(1,2)
. The metric tensor in polar coordinates is
(g
ab
) = diag(1, r
2
, r
2
sin
2
1
, . . . , r
2
sin
2
1
. . . sin
2
D2
). (3.4)
If D = 3 equation (3.3) reduces to:
cos
(1,2)
= cos
(1)
cos
(2)
+ sin
(1)
sin
(2)
cos(
(1)
(2)
).
The Ddimensional measure dx expressed in polar coordinates is
dx = r
D1
drd = r
D1
D1
k=1
(sin
k
)
D1k
drd
k
d =
D1
k=1
(sin
k
)
D1k
d
k
.
_
_
(3.5)
d denotes the (D 1)dimensional surface element on the unit sphere S
D1
and
(D) = 2
D/2
/(D/2) is the volume of the Ddimensional unit (S
D1
) sphere. The
determinant of the metric tensor is given by
g = det(g
ab
) =
_
r
D1
D1
k=1
(sin
k
)
D1k
_
2
(3.6)
With all this the path integral equation (3.1) yields:
K
(D)
(r
, {
}, r
, {
}; T) =
= lim
N
_
m
2 i h
_
ND/2
_
0
r
D1
(1)
dr
(1)
_
d
(1)
_
0
r
D1
(N1)
dr
(N1)
_
d
(N1)
j=1
exp
_
i m
2h
_
r
2
(j)
+r
2
(j1)
2r
(j)
r
(j1)
cos
(j,j1)
i
h
V (r
(j)
)
_
.
(3.7)
{} denotes the set of the angular variables. For further calculations we need the
formula [40, p.980]:
e
z cos
=
_
z
2
_
()
l=0
(l + )I
l+
(z)C
l
(cos ), (3.8)
41
Important Examples
(for some = 0, 1, 2, . . . ), where C
l
are Gegenbauer polynomials and I
modied
Bessel functions. Equation (3.8) is a generalization of the well known expansion in
three dimension where =
1
2
(remember C
1
2
l
= P
l
, [40, p.980]):
e
z cos
=
_
2z
l=0
(2l + 1)I
l+
1
2
(z)P
l
(cos ) (3.9)
Note: It is in some sense possible to include the case D = 2, i.e. = 0 if one uses
l lim
0
()C
l
= 2 cos l [40, p.1030], yielding nally [40, p.970]:
e
z cos
=
k=
I
k
(z) e
i k
. (3.10)
The addition theorem for the real surface (or hyperspherical) harmonics S
l
on the
S
D1
sphere has the form [31, Vol.II, Chapter IX]:
M
=1
S
l
(
(1)
)S
l
(
(2)
) =
1
(D)
2l +D 2
D2
C
D2
2
l
(cos
(1,2)
) (3.11)
with = x/r unit vector in R
d
and the M linearly independent S
l
of degree l with
M = (2l +D 2)(l + D 3)!/l!(D3)!. The orthonormality relation is
_
dS
l
()S
() =
ll
. (3.12)
Combining equations (3.8) and (3.11) we get the expansion formula
e
z(
(1)
(2)
)
= e
z cos
(1,2)
= 2
_
2
z
_
D2
2
l=0
M
=1
S
l
(
(1)
)S
l
(
(2)
)I
l+
D2
2
(z). (3.13)
Let = (D2)/2 > 0 in equation (3.8), then the jth term in equation (3.7) becomes
R
j
= exp
_
i m
2h
(r
2
(j)
+ r
2
(j1)
)
i
h
V (r
(j)
)
_
exp
_
m
2 i h
r
(j)
r
(j1)
cos
(j,j1)
_
=
_
2 i h
mr
(j)
r
(j1)
_
D2
2
_
D2
2
_
exp
_
i m
2h
(r
2
(j)
+r
2
(j1)
)
i
h
V (r
(j)
)
_
l
j
=0
_
l
j
+
D
2
1
_
I
l
j
+
D2
2
_
m
i h
r
(j)
r
(j1)
_
C
D2
2
l
j
(cos
(j,j1)
)
= 2
_
2 i h
mr
(j)
r
(j1)
_
D2
2
exp
_
i m
2h
(r
2
(j)
+ r
2
(j1)
)
i
h
V (r
(j)
)
_
l
j
=0
I
l
j
+
D2
2
_
m
i h
r
(j)
r
(j1)
_
M
j
=1
S
j
l
j
(
(j)
)S
j
l
j
(
(j1)
). (3.14)
42
III.3.1 The Radial Path Integral
With the help of equations (3.11) and (3.14) now (3.7) becomes:
K
(D)
(x
, x
; T)
= (r
D2
2
l=0
M
=1
S
l
(
)S
l
(
)
lim
N
_
m
i h
_
N
_
0
r
(1)
dr
(1)
. . .
_
0
r
(N1)
dr
(N1)
j=1
exp
_
i m
2h
(r
2
(j)
+r
2
(j1)
)
i
h
V (r
(j)
)
_
I
l+
D2
2
_
m
i h
r
(j)
r
(j1)
_
. (3.15)
Therefore we can separate the radial part of the path integral:
K
(D)
(r
, {
}, r
, {
}; T) =
1
(D)
l=0
l +D 2
D 2
C
D2
2
l
(cos
(
)
)K
l
(r
, r
; T)
(3.16)
with
K
(D)
l
(r
, r
; T) = (r
D2
2
lim
N
_
m
2 i h
_
N/2
_
0
dr
(1)
_
0
dr
(N1)
j=1
l
[r
(j)
r
(j1)
] exp
_
_
_
i
h
N
j=1
_
m
2
(r
(j)
r
(j1)
)
2
V (r
(j)
)
_
_
_
_
(3.17)
and the functional measure
(D)
l
(z
(j)
) =
_
2z
(j)
e
z
(j)
I
l+
D2
2
(z
(j)
), (3.18)
where z
(j)
= (m/ i h)r
(j)
r
(j1)
.
In the literature often use is been made of the asymptotic form of the modied
Bessel functions
I
(z) (2z)
1
2
e
z(
2
1
4
)/2z
(z 1, (z) > 0). (3.19)
Then the functional measure becomes (we ignore (z) = 0):
(D)
l
(z
(j)
) exp
_
i h
2mr
(j)
r
(j1)
_
_
l +
D 2
2
_
2
1
4
__
(3.20)
and K
(D)
l
reads:
K
(D)
l
(r
, r
; T) = (r
D1
2
lim
N
_
m
2 i h
_
N/2
_
0
dr
(1)
_
0
dr
(N1)
exp
_
_
_
i
h
N
j=1
_
m
2
(r
(j)
r
(j1)
)
2
h
2
(l +
D2
2
)
2
1
4
2mr
(j)
r
(j1)
V (r
(j)
)
_
_
_
_
. (3.21)
43
Important Examples
This last equation seems to suggests a Lagrangian formulation of the radial path
integral:
k
(D)
l
(r
, r
; T)
?
=
r(t
)=r
_
r(t
)=r
Dr(t) exp
_
i
h
_
t
_
m
2
r
2
h
2
(l +
D2
2
)
2
1
4
2mr
2
V (r)
__
.
(3.22)
with k
(D)
l
(r
, r
; T) = (r
)
(D1)/2
K
(D)
l
(r
, r
, r
; T) =
r(t
)=r
_
r(t
)=r
(D)
l
[r
2
]Dr(t) exp
_
i
h
_
t
_
m
2
r
2
V (r)
_
dt
_
(3.23)
and the whole ldependence is in
l
, as dened in equation (3.18) in the lattice
formulation. The asymptotic expansion of I
(z)
e
z
2z
k=0
(1)
k
(2z)
k
( + k +
1
2
)
k!( k +
1
2
)
+
exp[z ( +
1
2
)i]
2z
k=0
1
(2z)
k
( +k +
1
2
)
k!( k +
1
2
)
2z
_
exp
_
z
1
4
2z
_
+ exp
_
z +
1
4
2z
i
_
+
1
2
___
.
(3.24)
(+ for /2 < arg(z) < 3/2,  for 3/2 < arg(z) < /2). Langguth and
Inomata [67] argued that the inserting of the expansion (3.20) in the path integral
(3.17) can be justied (adopting an argument due to Nelson [80]), but things are not
such as easy. Our arguments are as follows:
1) The Schr odinger equation
_
h
2
2m
_
d
2
dr
2
+
D 1
2r
d
dr
_
+ h
2
l(l + D2)
2mr
2
+V (r)
_
(r; t) = i h
t
(r; t) (3.25)
can be derived from the short time kernel of the path integral (3.17).
2) For r
, r
2z e
z
I
(z)
2
(2)!!
z
+
1
2
_
1 +O(z
2
)
and it follows:
(D)
l
(z
(j)
)
_
r
l+(D1)/2
(r
0, r
> 0)
r
l+(D1)/2
(r
0, r
> 0)
(3.26)
44
III.3.1 The Radial Path Integral
for all j. If R
(D)
n,l
and e
(D)
n,l
denote the (normalized) radial state functions and
energy levels, respectively, of the Ddimensional problem, we have
K
(D)
l
(r
, r
; T) =
n=0
R
(D)
n,l
(r
)R
(D)
n,l
(r
) e
i T e
(D)/ h
n,l
/ h
(3.27)
and thus for any but sstates  including the factor r
(D1)/2
in equation (3.27) 
we have:
R
(D)
n,l
(r) r
l+(D1)/2
r
(D1)/2
= r
l
(3.28)
which is the correct boundary condition for R
(D)
n,l
.
Both points are not true for the path integral (3.22), because
1) we did not nd any obvious method for deriving the full Schroding er equation
(3.25), the angular dependence comes out wrong.
2) In the Euclidean region T i ( > 0) the functional measure is vanishing like
exp
_
h
N
_
(l +
D2
2
)
2
1
4
2mr
1
r
+
(l +
D2
2
)
2
1
4
2mr
(N1)
r
__
exp
_
_
_
h
N
N1
j=1
(l +
D2
2
)
2
1
4
2mr
(j)
r
(j1)
_
_
_
(3.29)
which is also vanishing for r
, r
= r
, r
; T) = (r
D1
2
lim
N
_
m
2 i h
_
N/2
_
0
dr
(1)
_
0
dr
(N1)
exp
_
_
_
i m
2h
N
j=1
(r
(j)
r
(j1)
)
2
_
_
_
(3.30)
cannot be calculated. The integrals turn out to be repeated integrals over errorfunc
tions which are not tractable. Also the method of Arthurs [4] fails. In this method
one assumes that the integrations in the limit 0 are eectively from to +.
The path integral (3.30) then becomes
K
(D)
l
(r
, r
; T) = (r
D1
2
exp
_
i m
2h
(r
)
2
_
which is wrong. The mirror term K
(D)
l
(r
, r
; T) is missing.
Let us discuss some properties of the path integral (3.22)
k
(D)
l
(r
, r
; T) =
r(t
)=r
_
r(t
)=r
(D)
l
[r
2
]Dr(t) exp
_
i
h
_
t
_
m
2
r
2
V (r)
_
dt
_
. (3.31)
45
Important Examples
1) The whole l and Ddependence is contained in
(D)
l
, as dened in (3.18):
(D)
l
[z
(j)
] =
_
2z
(j)
e
z
(j)
I
l+
D2
2
(z
(j)
). (3.32)
Therefore we can conclude:
(D)
l
[r
2
] =
(3)
l+
D3
2
[r
2
] (3.33)
and all dimensional dependence of the path integral (3.31) can be deduced from
the three dimensional case:
k
(D)
l
(r
, r
; T) = k
(3)
l+
D3
2
(r
, r
, T). (3.34)
From now on we will denote k
l
(T) = k
(3)
l
(T).
2) The boundary conditions we have already discussed; we have for the radial wave
functions u
(D)
l
and R
(D)
l
respectively:
u
(D)
l
(r) r
l+
D1
2
, R
(D)
l
(r) r
l
(r 0). (3.35)
We therefore state: The radial path integral k
l
(T) can be written as a superposition
of two one dimensional path integrals:
k
l
(r
, r
; T) = k
(1)
l
(r
, r
; T) (1)
l
k
(1)
l
(r
, r
; T) (3.36)
with
k
(1)
l
(r
, r
; T) = lim
N
_
m
2 i h
_N
2
_
dr
(1)
_
dr
(N1)
j=1
(D)
l
[r
(j)
r
(j1)
] exp
_
_
_
i
h
N
j=1
_
m
2h
2
r
(j)
V (r
(j)
)
_
_
_
_
. (3.37)
4) From equation (3.36) for the case l = V = 0 we have two free particle path integrals
the solution being:
k
V =0
0
(r
, r
; T) =
_
m
2 i hT
_1
2
_
exp
_
i m
2Th
(r
)
2
_
exp
_
i m
2Th
(r
+ r
)
2
__
=
_
m
2 i hT
_1
2
exp
_
i m
2Th
(r
)
2
__
1 exp
_
i m
hT
r
__
,
(3.38)
the second term is the so called mirror term. It is not allowed to drop it, even for
very small T 0, since this violates the boundary condition which demands that
k
V =0
0
vanishes for r
, r
, r
; T) = K
(1)
(r
, r
; T) K
(1)
(r
, r
; T) (3.39)
where K
(1)
denotes the onedimensional heat kernel in R. In the language of diusion
processes: r = 0 is an absorbing boundary and the job is done by the functional
measure
(D)
l
.
Let us discuss the radial path integral in the language of the Weylordering and
productordering rule [49]. We consider the Schrodinger equation in Ddimensions
with a potential V (x) = V (r):
i h
t
(r, {}; t) =
_
h
2
2m
LB
+V (r)
_
(r, {}; t) (3.40)
with
LB
the Laplace Beltrami operator. Introducing the Ddimensional Legendre
operator:
L
2
(D)
=
_
2
2
1
+ (D2) cot
1
1
_
+
1
sin
2
1
_
2
2
2
+ (D3) cot
2
2
_
+ . . .
+
1
sin
2
1
. . . sin
2
D3
_
2
2
D2
+ cot
D2
D2
_
+
1
sin
2
1
. . . sin
2
D2
2
.
(3.41)
the Laplace operator is:
LB
=
2
r
2
+
D 1
r
r
+
1
r
2
L
2
(D)
. (3.42)
Rewriting the Hamiltonian H =
h
2
2m
LB
yields:
H(p
r
, r, {p
, }) =
p
2
r
2m
+
1
2mr
2
_
p
2
1
+
1
sin
2
1
p
2
2
+. . . +
1
sin
2
1
. . . sin
2
D2
p
2
_
+ V
Weyl
({}) (3.43)
with
V
Weyl
(r, {}) =
h
2
8mr
2
_
1 +
1
sin
2
1
+ . . . +
1
sin
2
1
. . . sin
2
D2
_
. (3.44)
and the hermitean momenta
p
r
=
h
i
_
r
+
D1
2r
_
p
=
h
i
_
+
D 1
2
cot
_
p
=
h
i
.
_
_
(3.45)
47
Important Examples
Because of the special nature of g
ab
, the product ordering gives the same quantum
potential as the Weylordering, i.e. we have V
Weyl
= V
prod
. In particular we have
the equivalence
N1
j=1
_
g
(j)
exp
_
_
_
i
h
N
j=1
L
N
Cl
(r
(j)
, {
(j)
}, r
(j1)
, {
(j1)
})
_
_
_
=(g
1
4
N
j=1
_
g
(j)
exp
_
i
h
L
N
Cl
( r
(j)
, {
(j)
})
_
(3.46)
where
L
N
Cl
(r
(j)
, {
(j)
}, r
(j1)
, {
(j1)
})
=
m
2
2
_
(r
(j)
r
(j1)
)
2
+
r
(j) 2
_
(
(j)
1
(j1)
1
)
2
+
sin
2
(j)
1
(
(j)
2
(j1)
2
)
2
+. . .
. . . + (
sin
2
(j)
1
. . .
sin
2
(j1)
D2
)(
(j)
(j1)
)
2
__
(3.47)
denotes a classical Lagrangian on the lattice. L
N
Cl
( r
(j)
, {
(j)
}) is similar dened as
(3.47), except that one has to take all trigonometrics at midpoints. The features are,
of course, direct consequences of the product form denition as described in section
II.3. With the correct Hamiltonian (3.43) we can consider the Hamiltonian path
integral for the Feynman kernel K:
K
(D)
(r
, {
}, r
, {
}; T)
= (g
1
4
r(t
)=r
{(t
)=
}
_
r(t
)=r
{(t
)=
}
Dr(t)Dp
r
(t)D{}(t)D{p
}(t)
exp
_
i
h
_
t
_
p
r
r +
D1
=1
p
H
eff
(p
r
, r, {p
}, {})
_
dt
_
= (g
1
4
lim
N
N1
j=1
_
dr
(j)
d{
(j)
}
N
j=1
_
dp
r
(j)
d{p
(j)
}
(2h)
D
exp
_
_
_
i
h
_
_
N
j=1
p
r
(j)
r
(j)
+{p
(j)
}{
(j)
} H
eff
(p
r
(j)
, r
(j)
, {p
(j)
}, {
(j)
})
_
_
_
_
_
(3.48)
48
III.3.1 The Radial Path Integral
with the eective Hamiltonian
H
eff
(p
r
(j)
, r
(j)
, {p
(j)
,
(j)
}) =
p
2
r
(j)
2m
+
1
2m
r
2
(j)
_
_
p
2
(j)
1
+
1
sin
2
(j)
1
p
2
2
+ +
1
sin
2
(j)
1
. . .
sin
2
(j)
D2
p
2
(j)
_
_
+ V
Prod
({
(j)
})
(3.49)
After the integration over all momenta we get (V V
Weyl
= V
prod
):
K
(D)
(r
, r
, {
}, {
}; T)
=
r(t
)=r
{(t
)=
}
_
r(t
)=r
{(t
)=
}
Dr(t) D(t) exp
_
i
h
_
t
_
L
N
Cl
(r, r, {,
}) V (r, {})
dt
_
,
= lim
N
_
m
2 i h
_ND
2
N1
j=1
_
0
dr
D1
(j)
dr
(j)
_
d
(j)
exp
_
_
_
i
h
_
_
N
j=1
L
N
eff
(r
(j)
, {
(j)
}, r
(j1)
, {
(j1)
}) V (r
(j)
, {
(j)
})
_
_
_
_
_
(3.50)
with the eective Lagrangian
L
eff
(r, r, {,
})
=
m
2
[ r
2
+ r
2
2
1
+ r
2
sin
2
2
2
+ +r
2
(sin
2
1
. . . sin
2
D2
)
2
] V (r, {})
(3.51)
dened in the same way as L
N
Cl
in equation (3.47).
The path integral (3.50) with the Lagrangian given by equation (3.47) is too
complicated for explicit calculations. We therefore try to replace equation (3.47)
under the path integral (3.50) by the following expression:
L
Cl
(r, {}, r, {
})
L
Cl
(r, {}, r, {
}) :=
m
2
R
2
2
V
c
({}) (3.52)
where V
c
has to be determined and denotes the Ddimensional unit vector on the
S
D1
sphere. Thus we try to replace L
Cl
by a simpler expression and hope that
V
c
+ V
Weyl
is simple enough. We have
(
(1)
(2)
)
2
= 2(1 cos
(1,2)
) (3.53)
49
Important Examples
with the addition theorem (3.3). We shall use equation (3.53) to justify the replace
ment (3.52) and thereby derive an expression for V
c
. We start with the kinetic term
(x
(j)
x
(j1)
)
2
expressed in the polar coordinates (3.2), R = r (not xed), and expand
it in terms of r and
(j)
1
+ +
1
sin
2
(j)
1
. . . sin
2
(j)
D2
_
(3.55)
(V
c
is the same whether or not r
(j)
= 0). The result is that the potential V
c
generated
by these steps cancels exactly V
Weyl
(r, {})! Therefore we get:
K
(D)
(r
, r
, {
}, {
}; T) =
r(t
)=r
{(t
)=
}
_
r(t
)=r
{(t
)=}
Dr(t) D(t) exp
_
i
h
_
t
_
m
2
x
2
V (r)
_
dt
_
,
(3.56)
where x
2
has to be expressed in polar coordinates. In the lattice formulation x
2
reads
x
2
[r
2
(j)
+ r
2
(j1)
2r
(j)
r
(j1)
cos
(j,j1)
]/
2
. (3.57)
Therefore we arrive at equation (3.52) and both approaches are equivalent as it should
be.
Let us note that equation (3.54) as derived in [49] is eectively a regularization
of the highly singular terms in V . This corresponds to the 1/r
2
terms in the radial
path integral which have been regularized by the functional measure
l
[r
2
]. However,
the functional measure method gives a quite practical tool to regularize such singular
terms.
3.2. The Radial Harmonic Oscillator
Let us now discuss the most important application of equation (3.17), namely the
harmonic oscillator with V (r) =
1
2
m
2
r
2
. The calculation has rst been performed
by Peak and Inomata [84]. However, we present the more general case with time
dependent coecients following Goovaerts [39]. This example will be of great virtue
in the solution of various path integral problems.
50
III.3.2 The Radial Harmonic Oscillator
We have to study
K
l
(r
, r
; )
= (r
)
1D
2
lim
N
_
m
2 i h
_
N/2
_
0
dr
(1)
_
0
dr
(N1)
j=1
_
(D)
l
[r
(j)
r
(j1)
] exp
_
i m
2h
(r
(j)
r
(j1)
)
2
i
2 h
m
2
(t
(j)
)r
2
(j)
__
= (r
)
2D
2
lim
N
_
m
i h
_
N/2
_
0
r
(1)
r
(1)
_
0
r
(N1)
dr
(N1)
j=1
_
exp
_
i m
2h
(r
2
(j)
+ r
2
(j1)
)
i
2 h
m
2
(t
(j)
)r
2
(j)
_
I
l+
D2
2
_
m
i h
r
(j)
r
(j1)
__
= (r
)
2D
2
lim
N
_
i
_
N/2
e
i (r
2
+r
2
)/2
_
0
r
(1)
dr
(1)
_
0
r
(N1)
dr
(N1)
exp
_
i(
(1)
r
2
(1)
+
(2)
r
2
(2)
+ +
(N1)
r
2
(N1)
)
_
_
I
l+
D2
2
(i r
(0)
r
(1)
) . . . I
l+
D2
2
(i r
(N1)
r
(N)
)
_
= (r
)
2D
2
lim
N
K
N
l
(T) (3.58)
where K
N
l
(T) is dened by the iterated integrals. Furthermore we have set = m/h
and
(j)
= [1
2
m
2
(t
(j)
)/2]. We are now using [40, p.718]
_
0
x e
x
2
J
(x)J
(x)dx =
1
2
e
(
2
+
2
)/4
I
2
_
(3.59)
which is valid for () > 1,  arg
(i ar)I
(i br)dr =
i
2
e
(a
2
+b
2
)/4i
I
_
ab
2i
_
(3.60)
is valid for > 1 and () > 0. By means of equation (3.60) we obtain for K
N
l
(T):
K
N
l
(T) =
_
i
_N
2
exp
_
i
2
(r
2
+r
2
)
__
0
r
(1)
dr
(1)
_
0
r
(N1)
dr
(N1)
exp
_
i(
(1)
r
2
(1)
+
(2)
r
2
(2)
+ +
(N1)
r
2
(N1)
)
_
_
I
l+
D2
2
(i r
(0)
r
(1)
) . . . I
l+
D2
2
(i r
(N1)
r
(N)
)
_
=
N
i
exp
_
i p
N
r
2
+ i q
N
r
2
_
I
l+
D2
2
(i
N
r
) (3.61)
51
Important Examples
where the coecients
N
, p
N
and q
N
are given by
N
=
N1
k=1
2
k
p
N
=
2
N1
k=1
2
k
4
k
q
N
=
2
2
4
N1
1
= ,
k+1
=
k
j=1
2
k
(k 1)
1
=
1
,
k+1
=
k+1
2
4
k
.
_
_
(3.62)
We must now determine these quantities. Let us start with the evaluation of
k
.
Putting
2
k
=
y
k+1
y
k
(3.63)
we obtain
k+1
=
k+1
2
4
k
y
k+1
2y
k
+ y
k1
2
+
2
k
y
k
= 0. (3.64)
In the limit N this gives a dierential equation for y
y +
2
(t)y = 0
with solution y = (t
y
0
1
2y
0
, ( 0),
and on the other
y
0
=
y
1
y
0
=
1
_
2
1
1
_
y
0
1, ( 1),
we have the boundary conditions
(0) = 0, (0) = 1. (3.65)
Now let us expand y
k+1
[(k + 1)] + O(
3
), we observe that
y
k+1
2y
k
+ y
k1
+
2
2
(t
+k)y
k
= 0
52
III.3.2 The Radial Harmonic Oscillator
is satised up to second order in . Therefore expanding (3.64)
k+1
=
2
y
k+2
y
k+1
=
2
[(k + 2)] + O(
3
)
[(k + 1)] + O(
3
)
.
Consequently
lim
N
N
= lim
N
m
h
N1
j=1
(j) + O(
3
)
[(j + 1)] +O(
3
)
= lim
N
m
h
(0)
(N)
=
m
h(T)
. (3.66)
Similarly
lim
N
q
N
= lim
N
m
2h
_
1
[(N 1)] + O(
3
)
[N] + O(
3
)
_
= lim
N
m
2 h
[N] [t
+ (N 1)]
[N]
=
m (T)
2 h(T)
. (3.67)
Finally we must calculates p
N
. We have
lim
N
p
N
= lim
N
_
2
N1
k=1
2
k
4
k
_
=
m
2 h
lim
N
_
1
N1
k=1
2
[(k + 1)]
_
=
m
2 h
lim
N
_
1
_
T
dt
2
(t)
_
=
m
2 h(T)
lim
N
_
(T)
(T)
_
T
dt
2
(t)
_
m
2 h(T)
(T).
(3.68)
Furthermore we nd
lim
N
() = lim
N
()
()
_
dt
2
(t)
lim
0
(0) + (0)
= (0) = 1
lim
0
() = lim
0
_
()
1
()
_
= lim
0
(0)[(0) + (0)]
[(0) + (0)]
= 0,
and therefore (t) is satisfying the boundary conditions
(0) = 1,
(0) = 0. (3.69)
53
Important Examples
(t) is found to satisfy the dierential equation
+
2
(t) = 0. (3.70)
Therefore we have
P(T) = lim
N
p
N
=
m
2 h
(T)
(T)
(3.71)
and we have nally for the path integral of the radial harmonic oscillator with time
dependent frequency:
K
l
(r
, r
; T)
= (r
)
2D
2
m
i h(T)
exp
_
i m
2 h
_
(T)
(T)
r
2
+
(T)
(T)
r
2
__
I
l+
D2
2
_
mr
i h(T)
_
. (3.72)
In particular for (t) = = const.:
(t) =
1
sin (t t
), (t) = cos (t t
)
(t) = cos (t t
)
which yields the radial path integral solution for the radial harmonic oscillator with
timeindependent frequency
K
l
(r
, r
; T)
= (r
)
2D
2
m
i hsin T
exp
_
i m
2 h
(r
2
+ r
2
) cot T
_
I
l+
D2
2
_
mr
i hsin T
_
. (3.73)
It is possible to get the same result, if one starts with the Ddimensional path integral
in Cartesian coordinates:
K(x
, x
; ) =
x(t
)=x
_
x(t
)=x
Dx(t) exp
_
i m
2 h
_
t
_
x
2
2
x
2
dt
_
(3.74)
insert for every dimension the solution of the onedimensional oscillator
K(x
k
, x
k
; T) =
_
m
2ihsin T
exp
_
i m
2 h
_
(x
k
2
+ x
k
2
) cot T
2x
k
x
k
sin T
__
(3.75)
and uses equations (3.8) and (3.11).
The next step is to calculate with the help of equation (3.73) the energylevels and
statefunctions. For this purpose we use the HilleHardyformula [40, p.1038]
t
/2
1 t
exp
_
1
2
(x +y)
1 + t
1 t
_
I
_
2
xyt
1 t
_
=
n=0
t
n
n! e
1
2
(x+y)
(n + + 1)
(xy)
/2
L
()
n
(x)L
()
n
(y).
(3.76)
54
III.3.2 The Radial Harmonic Oscillator
With the substitution t = e
2 i T
, x = mr
2
/h and y = mr
2
/h in equation (3.73)
we get nally:
K
l
(r
, r
; T) =
N=0
e
i TE
N
/ h
R
l
N
(r
)R
l
N
(r
) (3.77)
E
N
= h
_
N +
D
2
_
(3.78)
R
l
N
(r) =
2m
hr
D2
(
Nl
2
+ 1)
(
N+l+D
2
)
_
m
h
r
2
_
l+
D2
2
exp
_
m
h
r
2
_
L
(l+
D2
2
)
Nl
2
_
m
h
r
2
_
.
(3.79)
The path integral for the harmonic oscillator suggests a generalization in the index
l. This will be very important in further applications. For this purpose we consider
equation (3.17) with the nontrivial functional measure
(D)
l
(r
2
)
l
[r
2
]:
K
l
(r
, r
; T) =
1
r
r(t
)=r
_
r(t
)=r
Dr(t)
l
[r
2
] exp
_
i
h
_
t
_
m
2
r
2
V (r)
_
dt
_
(3.80)
The functional measure corresponds to a potential V
l
= h
2 l(l+1)
2mr
2
in the Schrodinger
equation. Assuming that we can analytically continue in l with () > 1, then
we get for an arbitrary potential V
(r) = h
2
1
4
2mr
2
navely inserted into the radial path
integral
r(t
)=r
_
r(t
)=r
Dr(t) exp
_
i
h
_
t
_
m
2
r
2
h
2
1
4
2mr
2
m
2
2
r
2
_
dt
_
. (3.81)
This path integral must now be interpreted in terms of the functional measure in
equation (3.18). Dene (z mr
(j1)
r
(j)
/ i h):
[r
2
] = lim
N
N
j=1
_
2z
(j)
e
z
(j)
I
(z
(j)
). (3.82)
Then equation (3.81) must be interpreted with the help of equation (3.82) as
r(t
)=r
_
r(t
)=r
Dr(t) exp
_
i
h
_
t
_
m
2
r
2
h
2
1
4
2mr
2
m
2
2
r
2
_
dt
_
:=
r(t
)=r
_
r(t
)=r
Dr(t)
[r
2
] exp
_
i m
2 h
_
t
_
r
2
2
r
2
_
dt
_
=
m
i hsin T
exp
_
i m
2 h
_
r
2
+r
2
_
cot T
_
I
_
mr
i hsin T
_
. (3.83)
55
Important Examples
This important equation has been derived by Peak and Inomata [84] with the
help of the threedimensional radial harmonic oscillator, and by Duru [26] with the
corresponding twodimensional case. Duru considered the radial potential problem
V (r) =
a
r
2
+ br
2
(3.84)
with some numbers a and b. Identifying a = ( h
2
/2m)(
2
1
4
) and b =
1
2
m
2
it is
simple calculation to express equation (3.83) in terms of a and b, which is omitted
here. However, these authors did not discuss this path integral identity in terms of the
functional measure language. That such a procedure is actually legitimate is beyond
the scope of these notes. It was justied by Fischer, Leschke and M uller [35] for the
radial path integral and for the PoschlTeller path integral as well (see below), where
one also has to be careful with the appropriate Besselian functional measure. In the
functional measure interpretation equation (3.83) can be found in references [49] and
[92]. Equation (3.83) is very important in numerous applications.
Let us note the free particle case. In the limit 0 we obtain in equation (3.73)
K
(=0)
l
(r
, r
; T)
= (r
)
2D
2
m
i hT
exp
_
i m
2 hT
(r
2
+r
2
)
_
I
l+
D2
2
_
mr
i hT
_
= (r
)
2D
2
_
0
dp p exp
_
i hTp
2
2m
_
J
l+
D2
2
(pr
)J
l+
D2
2
(pr
) (3.85)
with wavefunctions and energy spectrum
p
(r) = r
2D
2
p J
l+
D2
2
(pr), E
p
=
h
2
p
2
2m
. (3.86)
The onedimensional case gives (i.e. motion on the halfline)
p
(r) = r
p J1
2
(pr) =
_
2
r
sin pr, E
p
=
h
2
p
2
2m
. (3.87)
However, there is an ambiguity in the boundary condition for r = 0 for D = 1. The
present case here, i.e.
p
(0) = 0, corresponds to a specic self adjoint extension of the
Hamiltonian H = h
2
d
2
/dx
2
for functions L
2
([0, )) on the halfline.
Finally we calculate the energy dependent Green function for the radial harmonic
oscillator. Making use of the integral representation of the previous section we obtain
G
l
(r
, r
; E)
= i
_
0
e
i ET/ h
K
l
(r
, r
; T)dt
=
[
1
2
(l +
D
2
E
h
)]
(r
)
D/2
(l +
D
2
)
W E
2 h
,
1
2
(l+
D2
2
)
_
m
h
r
2
>
_
M E
2 h
,
1
2
(l+
D2
2
)
_
m
h
r
2
<
_
.
(3.88)
56
III.4 Other Elementary Path Integrals
From this representation we can recover by means of the expansion for the function
the wavefunctions of equation (3.79).
The corresponding Green function for the free particle has the form
G
(=0)
l
(r
, r
; E)
=
2m
h(r
)
D2
2
I
l+
D2
2
_
1
i
_
mE
2 h
2
(r
+ r
r
)
_
K
l+
D2
2
_
1
i
_
mE
2 h
2
(r
+ r
+r
)
_
(3.89)
=
i m
h(r
)
D2
2
J
l+
D2
2
_
_
mE
2 h
2
(r
+ r
r
)
_
H
(1)
l+
D2
2
_
_
mE
2 h
2
(r
+ r
+r
)
_
,
(3.90)
where use has been made of the integral representation
_
0
dx
x
exp
_
px
a + b
2x
_
I
_
a b
2x
_
= 2I
p
_
a
b
_
_
K
p
_
a +
b
_
_
.
(3.91)
4. Other Elementary Path Integrals
There are two further path integral solutions based on the SU(2) [5, 25, 60] and
SU(1, 1) [5, 61] group path integration, respectively. The rst yields the path integral
identity for the solution of the PoschlTeller potential according to
K
(PT)
(x
, x
; T)
=
x(t
)=x
_
x(t
)=x
Dx(t) exp
_
i
h
_
t
_
m
2
x
2
h
2
2m
_
1
4
sin
2
x
+
1
4
cos
2
x
__
dt
_
=
l=0
exp
_
i hT
2m
( + + 2l + 1)
2
_
(,)
l
(x
)
(,)
l
(x
)
=
sin 2x
sin 2x
J=0,
1
2
exp
_
i hT
2m
(2J + 1)
2
_
(2J + 1)D
J
+
2
,
2
(cos 2x
)D
J
+
2
,
2
(cos 2x
) (4.1)
with the wavefunctions given by
(,)
n
(x) =
_
(2J + 1) sin2xD
J
+
2
,
2
(cos 2x) (4.2a)
57
Important Examples
=
_
2( + + 2l + 1)
l!( + + l + 1)
( +l + 1)( + l + 1)
_1
2
(sin x)
+
1
2
(cos x)
+
1
2
P
(,)
n
(cos 2x). (4.2b)
=
_
+ + 2l + 1
2
++1
l!( + +l + 1)
( + l + 1)( +l + 1)
_1
2
2
(1 + cos 2x)
2
P
(,)
n
(cos 2x).
(4.2c)
Here, of course we can analytically continue from integer values of m and n to, say,
real numbers and , respectively .
Similarly we can state a path integral identity for the modied PoschTeller
potential which is dened as
V
(,)
(r) =
h
2
2m
_
1
4
sinh
2
r
1
4
cosh
2
r
_
. (4.3)
This can be achieved by means of the path integration of the SU(1, 1) group manifold.
One gets
K
(MPT)
(r
, r
; T) =
N
M
n=0
(,)
n
(r
)
(,)
n
(r
) exp
_
i hT
2m
_
2(k
1
k
2
n) 1
_
2
_
+
_
0
dp
(,)
p
(r
)
(,)
p
(r
) exp
_
i hT
2m
p
2
_
. (4.4)
Introduce the numbers k
1
, k
2
dened by: k
1
=
1
2
(1 ), k
2
=
1
2
(1 ), where the
correct sign depends on the boundary conditions for r 0 and r , respectively.
In particular for
2
=
1
4
, i.e. k
2
=
1
4
,
3
4
, we obtain wavefunctions with even and odd
parity, respectively. The number N
M
denotes the maximal number of states with
0, 1, . . . , N
M
< k
1
k
2
1
2
. The bound state wavefunctions read as:
(k
1
,k
2
)
n
(r) = N
(k
1
,k
2
)
n
(sinh r)
2k
2
1
2
(cosh r)
2k
1
+
3
2
2
F
1
(k
1
+ k
2
+, k
1
+ k
2
+ 1; 2k
2
; sinh
2
r)
N
(k
1
,k
2
)
n
=
1
(2k
2
)
_
2(2 1)(k
1
+ k
2
)(k
1
+ k
2
+ 1)
(k
1
k
2
+ )(k
1
k
2
+ 1)
_1
2
_
_
(4.5)
( = k
1
k
2
n), (there is a factor 2 missing in reference [36]). Note the equivalent
formulation
(,)
n
(r) =
_
n!(n + + + 1)
2
+
(n + + 1)(n + + 1)
_1
2
(1 x)
2
(1 + x)
1
2
P
(,)
n
(x), (4.6)
58
III.5 The Coulomb Potential
with the substitutions = 2k
2
1, = 2(k
1
k
2
n)1 = 21, x = 2/ cosh
2
r1 with
the incorporation of the appropriate measure term, i.e. dr =
_
(1 + x)
_
2(1 x)
_
1
dx.
The scattering states are given by:
(k
1
,k
2
)
p
(r) = N
(k
1
,k
2
)
p
(cosh r)
2k
1
1
2
(sinh r)
2k
2
1
2
2
F
1
(k
1
+ k
2
, k
1
+ k
2
+ 1; 2k
2
; sinh
2
r)
N
(k
1
,k
2
)
p
=
1
(2k
2
)
_
p sinh p
2
2
_
(k
1
+k
2
)(k
1
+k
2
+ )
(k
1
+k
2
+ 1)(k
1
+k
2
+ 1)
_1
2
,
_
_
(4.7)
[ =
1
2
(1 + ip)].
It is possible to state closed expressions for the (energy dependent) Green functions
for the PoschlTeller and modied PoschlTeller potential, respectively. For the Poschl
Teller potential it has the form (Kleinert and Mustapic [65])
G(x
, x
; E) =
m
i h
sin 2x
sin 2x
(m
1
L
E
)(L
E
+m
1
+ 1)
(m
1
+ m
2
+ 1)(m
1
m
2
+ 1)
_
1 cos 2x
2
_
(m
1
m
2
)/2
_
1 + cos 2x
2
_
(m
1
+m
2
)/2
_
1 cos 2x
2
_
(m
1
m
2
)/2
_
1 + cos 2x
2
_
(m
1
+m
2
)/2
2
F
1
_
L
E
+ m
1
; L
E
+m
1
+ 1; m
1
m
2
+ 1;
1 cos 2x
2
_
2
F
1
_
L
E
+ m
1
; L
E
+m
1
+ 1; m
1
+ m
2
+ 1;
1 + cos 2x
2
_
(4.8)
with m
1/2
=
1
2
( ), L
E
=
1
2
+
1
2
2mE /h and x
. A similar expression
is valid for the modied PoschlTellerpotential Green function (see [65]) which is,
however, omitted here.
5. The Coulomb Potential
The hydrogen atom is, of course, one of the most interesting subjects in quantum
mechanics. In the beginnings of quantum mechanics and with the atom model of
Rutherford it was a riddle how to tract a system which is from the classical physics
point of view unstable and doomed to vanish into pure radiation. Its was Bohrs
genius, postulating the famous rules that only a countable number of orbits are allowed
satisfying the quantum condition
_
pdq = nh (n N). However, this old quantum
mechanics was not sucient, because it fails e.g. in the case of the heliumatom, and
it was Pauli who solved the hydrogen problem in the terms of the new quantum
mechanics developed by Schrodinger and Heisenberg. It is surprising, that Pauli did
59
Important Examples
not use a dierential equation and solves the corresponding Eigenvalue problem as
Schrodinger did later, instead he exploited in fact the hidden SO(4) symmetry of
the KeplerCoulombproblem. This symmetry gives classically rise to an conserved
quantity, called LenzRunge vector. This additional symmetry allows also a separation
of the Coulomb problem in parabolic coordinates. This vector points from the focal
point of the orbit the perihel.
Ever since the success of quantum mechanics the hydrogen atom was the model
to test the theory, may it be Diracs relativistic quantum mechanics, where rst the
nestructure constant = e
2
/hc arises.
It was for a long time a really nuisance that this important physical system
could not be treated by path integrals. Calculating wave functions and energy
levels remains more or less a simple task in the operator language, but even the
construction of the Green function (resolvent kernel) was impossible for a long time.
It takes as long as 1979 as Duru and Kleinert [27, 28] nally applied a longknown
transformation in astronomy (KustaanheimoStiefel transformation [66]) in the path
integral of the Coulomb problem and were successful. Even more, their idea of
transforming simultaneously coordinates and the timeslicing opens new possibilities in
solving the huge amount of unsolved path integral problems. In particular, Coulomb
related potentials, in the sense, that all these problems can be reformulated in terms
of conuent hypergeoemtric functions, like the Morsepotential could be successfully
treated. However, the original attempt of Duru and Kleinert was done in a more or
less formal manner, and it does not takes a long time when it was rened by Inomata
[58] and Duru and Kleinert [28].
Closely related to the original Coulomb problem is, of course, the 1/rpotential
discussion in R
D
. The D = 2 case in discussed in this subsection, whereas the original
Coulomb problem in the next.
As it turns out its Schrodinger equation for the Coulomb potential is separable in
four coordinate systems:
1) Spherical coordinates:
x = r sin cos
y = r sin sin
z = r cos
(r 0, 0 , 0 2). (5.1)
Separation of variables in this coordinate system is, of course, not a specic feature
of the Coulomb problem, but a common property of all radial potentials.
2) Parabolic coordinates:
x = cos
y = sin
z =
1
2
(
2
2
)
(, 0, 0 2). (5.2)
Here electric and magnetic elds can be introduced without spoiling separability.
60
III.5.1 The 1/rpotential in R
2
3) Spheroidal coordinates:
x = sinh sin sin
y = sinh sin cos
z = cosh cos + 1
( 0, 0 , 0 2). (5.3)
Here a further charge can be introduced and therefore these coordinates are
suitable for the study of the hydrogen ion H
+
2
.
4) Spheroconical coordinates:
x = r sn(, k) dn(, k
)
y = r cn(, k) cn(, k
)
z = r dn(, k) sn(, k
)
r 0,  K,  2K
,
0 k, k
1, k
2
+ k
2
= 1.
(5.4)
sn(, k), cn(, k) and dn(, k) denote Jacobi elliptic functions (e.g. [40, pp.910])
of modulus k and with real and imaginary periods 4K and 4iK
, respectively.
Here the corresponding wave functions in and can be identied with the wave
functions of a quantum mechanically asymmetric top.
We will discuss the path integral for the Coulomb system in the rst two of these
coordinate systems. For the usual polar and parabolic coordinate coordinate system
the path integration can be exactly performed. In the remaining two, however, the
theory of special functions of these coordinate is poorly developed and no solution
seems up to now available. Nevertheless it is possible to formulate the Coulomb
problem in these coordinate systems and point out some relations to other problems
connected to these coordinates [46].
It is surprising that the Coulomb path integral was rst solved in Cartesian
coordinates (where the KustaanheimoStiefel transformation works) and not in polar
coordinates. Looking at the appropriate formul we see that even in the one
dimensional case (in polar coordinates) we need the onedimensional realization of
the KustaanheimoStiefel transformation and a spacetime transformation.
5.1. The 1/rPotential in R
2
[28, 57]
We consider the Euclidean twodimensional space with the singular potential V (r) =
Z e
2
/r (r = x, x R
2
). Here, e
2
denotes the square of an electric charged Z
its multiplicity (including sign). However, as already noted, this potential is not the
potential of a point charge in R
2
. The classical Lagrangian now has the form
L(x, x) =
m
2
x
2
+
Z e
2
r
. (5.5)
Of course, bound and continuous states can exist, depending on the sign of Z. The
path integral is given by
K(x
, x
; T) =
x(t
)=x
_
x(t
)=x
Dx(t) exp
_
i
h
_
t
_
m
2
x
2
+
Z e
2
r
_
dt
_
. (5.6)
61
Important Examples
Discussion of this path integral are due to Duru and Kleinert [27,28] and Inomata
[58]. However, the latticeformulation is not trivial for the 1/rterm. In fact, it is too
singular for a path integral, respectively, a stochastic process and some regularization
must be found. This is known for some time, and it turns out that the Kustaanheimo
Stiefel transformation does the job.
As it turns out one must perform a spacetime transformation in order to solve
the path integral (5.6). We perform rst the transformation
x
1
=
2
2
, x
2
= 2, u
_
_
R
2
, (5.7)
which casts the original Lagrangian into the form
L(u, u) = 2m(
2
+
2
)(
2
+
2
) +
Z e
2
2
+
2
. (5.8)
The metric tensor (g
ab
) and its inverse (g
ab
) are given by
(g
ab
) = 4(
2
+
2
)
_
1 0
0 1
_
, (g
ab
) =
1
4(
2
+
2
)
_
1 0
0 1
_
(5.9)
with determinant g = det(g
ab
) = 16(
2
+
2
)
2
and dV = dx
1
dx
2
= 4(
2
+
2
)dd.
The hermitean momenta corresponding to the scalar product
(
1
,
2
) = 4
_
dd (
2
+
2
)
1
(, )
2
(, ) (5.10)
are given by
p
=
h
i
_
2
+
2
_
, p
=
h
i
_
2
+
2
_
. (5.11)
Following our general theory of Chapter II.5 we start by considering the Legendre
transformed Hamiltonian
H
E
=
h
2
2m
_
2
x
2
1
+
2
x
2
2
_
Z e
2
r
E. (5.12)
which gives
H
E
=
h
2
2m
1
4(
2
+
2
)
_
2
2
+
2
2
_
Z e
2
2
+
2
E. (5.13)
Therefore the timetransformation is given by = f(, ) with f(, ) = 4(
2
+
2
)
and the spacetime transformed Hamiltonian has the form
H =
h
2
2m
_
2
2
+
2
2
_
4Z e
2
4E(
2
+
2
)
=
1
2m
(p
2
+ p
2
) 4Z e
2
4E(
2
+
2
)
(5.14)
62
III.5.1 The 1/rpotential in R
2
with the momentum operators and vanishing quantum potential V :
p
=
h
i
, p
=
h
i
, V = 0. (5.15)
This twodimensional transformation can be interpreted as a twodimensional Kustaan
heimoStiefel transformation [66]. It has the general feature that it performs a change
of variables to squareroot coordinates, note r =
2
+
2
. The general properties of
transformations like this states the following problem (see e.g. [28, 46] for some review
of the relevant literature): For which values of D does exist a formula
(x
2
1
+ +x
2
D
)(y
2
1
+ + y
2
D
) = z
2
1
+ + z
2
D
, (5.16)
where the z
i
are homogeneous bilinear forms in x and y. Following a theorem of
Hurwitz and Lam this type of transformation can only be realized in the space
dimensions D = 1, 2, 4, 8. The assumption about z now implies that
z = B(x) y (5.17)
z
i
=
k,l
(B
k
)
l
i
x
k
y
l
=
l
B(x)
l
i
y
i
. (5.18)
For the special case x = y one has
i
z
2
i
=
_
j
x
2
j
_
2
(5.19)
and the matrix B satises the condition
t
B(x)B(x) = x
2
. (5.20)
The onedimensional case is trivial, but we shall use it in the calculation of the
path integral for the 1/rpotential in polar coordinates. The D = 2 case we have just
encountered. The fourdimensional variation of this transformation has been used a
long time ago in astronomy for the purpose of regularizing the Kepler problem. The
D = 8 case is degenerate. Here the matrix B has the form:
B(x) =
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
x
1
x
2
x
3
x
4
x
5
x
6
x
7
x
8
x
2
x
1
x
4
x
3
x
6
x
5
x
8
x
7
x
3
x
4
x
1
x
2
x
7
x
8
x
5
x
6
x
4
x
3
x
2
x
1
x
8
x
7
x
6
x
5
x
5
x
6
x
7
x
8
x
1
x
2
x
3
x
4
x
6
x
5
x
8
x
7
x
2
x
1
x
4
x
3
x
7
x
8
x
5
x
6
x
3
x
4
x
1
x
2
x
8
x
7
x
6
x
5
x
4
x
3
x
2
x
1
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
(5.21)
and maps R
8
R and is thus of no further use.
63
Important Examples
In the next Section (hydrogenatom) we need the D = 4 case which is more involved
and not onetoone.
To incorporate the time transformation
s(t) =
_
t
t
d
4r()
, s
= s(t
) (5.22)
and its lattice denition 4 r
(j)
s
(j)
= 4 u
(j) 2
(j)
into the path integral (5.6) we
now use from the set of equations (II.4.35), namely equation (II.4.35a). Observing
that in the path integral (5.6) the measure changes according to
N
j=1
_
m
2 i ht
(j)
_
N1
j=1
dx
(j)
1
dx
(j)
2
=
1
r
j=1
_
m
2 i h
(j)
_
N1
j=1
d
(j)
d
(j)
(5.23)
we arrive at the path integral transformations equations (u R
2
):
K(x
, x
; T) =
1
2 i h
_
dE e
i TE/ h
G(x
, x
; E) (5.24)
G(x
, x
; E) = i
_
0
ds
K(u
, u
; s
) +
K(u
, u
; s
)
_
(5.25)
where the spacetime transformed path integral
K is given by
K(u
, u
; s
) = e
4 i Z e
2
s
/ h
_
D(s)
_
D(s)
exp
_
i
h
_
s
0
_
m
2
(
2
+
2
) + 4E(
2
+
2
)
_
ds
_
. (5.26)
Note that the factor 1/r
to x
, they will be mapped into two dierent classes of paths in the uplane: Those
which go from u
to u
to u
x
2
these are the paths passing an even or odd number of times
through the square root from x = 0 and x = . We may choose the u
corresponding
to the initial x
to lie on the rst sheet (i.e. in the right half uplane). The nal u
can be in the right as well as the left halfplane and all paths on the xplane go over
into paths from u
to u
to u
K(u
, u
; s
) =
m
2 i hsin s
exp
_
4 i Z e
2
s
h
m
2 i h
_
(u
2
+u
2
) cot s
2
u
sin s
__
.
(5.27)
64
III.5.1 The 1/rpotential in R
2
Introducing now twodimensional polarcoordinates
=
r cos
2
, =
r sin
2
, (r > 0, [0, 2]) (5.28)
so that u
cos(
)/2. Thus
G(x
, x
; E) =
m
h
_
0
ds
sin s
exp
_
4 i Z e
2
h
s
m
2 i h
(r
+ r
)
_
cosh
_
m
i hsin s
cos
2
_
(5.29)
Using the expansion
cos
_
z cos
2
_
=
l=
e
i l
I
2l
(z) (5.30)
we get for the kernel G(x
, x
; E):
G(x
, x
; E) =
1
2
l=
e
i l(
)
G
l
(r
, r
; E), (5.31)
where the radial kernel G
l
(E) is given by
G
l
(r
, r
; E)
=
2m
h
_
0
ds
sin s
exp
_
4 i Z e
2
s
h
m
2 i h
(r
+ r
) cot s
_
I
2l
_
m
i hsins
_
(Set =
2 i p h
m
, substitution u =
2p hs
m
and Wickrotation)
=
2m
h
_
0
du
sinh u
exp
_
2 i
ap
u + i p(r
+ r
) coth u
_
I
2l
_
2p
i sinh u
_
(Substitution sinh u = 1/ sinhv)
=
2m
h
_
0
_
coth
v
2
_ 2
ap
exp
_
i p(r
+ r
) cosh v
I
2l
_
2 i p
sinh v
_
dv
(Reinsert hp =
2mE)
=
1
m
2E
1
(2l)!
_
1
2
+ l
Z e
2
h
_
m
2E
_
W
Z e
2
h
m
2E
,l
_
_
8mE
h
2
r
>
_
M
Z e
2
h
m
2E
,l
_
_
8mE
h
2
r
<
_
. (5.32)
In the last step we have used (2.22) and r
>
, r
<
denotes the larger (smaller) of r
, r
,
respectively. The representation (5.32) shows that G
l
(E) has in the complex energy
plane poles which are given at the negative integers n
l
= 0, 1, 2, . . . at the argument
65
Important Examples
of the function and a cut on the real axis with a branch point at E = 0. Thus we
get a discrete and continuous spectrum, respectively:
E
N
=
mZ
2
e
4
2 h
2
(N
1
2
)
2
, (N = 1, 2, . . . ) (5.33)
E
p
=
h
2
p
2
2m
, (p R). (5.34)
Here we have introduced the principle quantum number N := n
l
+ l + 1. This is the
wellknown result.
To determine the discrete spectrum we consider the rst line in equation (5.32),
identify in the HilleHardy formula t = e
2u
, x = mr
and y = mr
, r
; E) =
m
h
n=0
(2 i p
)
2l
n + l +
1
2
i
ap
n!
(2l +n)!
exp[i p(r
+ r
)]L
(2l)
n
(2 i pr
)L
(2l)
n
(2 i pr
). (5.35)
Taking equation (5.35) and the n
th
residuum gives the energy levels and the wave
functions. Inserting into equation (5.29) thus yields the Green functions for the
discrete levels for the twodimensional 1/rpotential
G(x
, x
; E) = h
N=1
l=
N,l
(r
N,l
(r
)
E
N
E
(5.36)
and the wave functions of the discrete spectrum are given by:
N,l
(r, ) =
_
(N l 1)!
a
2
(N
1
2
)
3
(N + l 1)!
_1
2
_
2r
a(N
1
2
)
_
l
exp
_
r
a(N
1
2
)
i l
_
L
(2l)
Nl1
_
2r
a(N
1
2
)
_
. (5.37)
Furthermore we have used the abbreviation a = h
2
/(mZ e
2
) (the rst Bohrradius).
The correct normalization to unity can be seen from the relation
_
0
x
2l++2
e
x
_
L
(2l++1)
Nl1
(x)
_
2
dx =
2(N +
2
)(N +l + )!
(N l 1)!
, (5.38a)
respectively
_
0
x
+a
e
x
_
L
()
n
(x)
_
2
dx =
(2n + + 1)(n + + 1)
n!
. (5.38b)
66
III.5.1 The 1/rpotential in R
2
In order to determine the continuous wave functions we use the dispersion relation
[40, p.987]
_
dx e
2ix
_
1
2
+ + ix
_
_
1
2
+ ix
_
M
ix,
()M
ix,
()
=
2
cosh
exp
_
( + ) tanh
J
2
_
2
cosh
_
. (5.39)
and get ( h p =
2mE )
G
l
(r
, r
; E)
= 2 i p
_
0
ds
sin s
exp
_
4 i Z e
2
h
s
p(r
+r
) cot s
_
I
2l
_
2 p
sin s
_
=
i
_
0
ds
exp
_
4 i Z e
2
h
s
_
0
(
1
2
+ l + ip)
2
2
(2l + 1)
exp
_
4 i p phs
m
+p
_
M
i p,l
(2 i pr
)M
i p,l
(2 i pr
)dp
= h
_
0
dp
h
2
p
2
/2mE
exp
_
ap
_
_
1
2
+ l +
i
ap
_
_
1
2
+l
i
ap
_
2
(2l)!
M
i
ap
,l
(2 i pr
)M i
ap
,l
(2 i pr
). (5.40)
Here again the residuum at E = h
2
p
2
/2m has been taken in the integral. Thus the
wave functions of the continuous spectrum are given by ( hp =
2mE):
p,l
(r, ) =
_
1
4
2
r
1
(2l)!
_
1
2
+ l +
i
ap
_
exp
_
2ap
i l
_
M i
ap
,l
(2 i pr). (5.41)
Note that
_
1
2
+ l +
i
ap
_
M i
ap
,l
(2 i pr) =
_
1
2
+ l +
i
ap
_
i
ap
,l
(2 i pr) (5.42)
and the wavefunctions are therefore basically real. These results of the 1/r potential
for the discrete and continuous spectrum, respectively, are equivalent with the results
of the operator approach. The complete Feynman kernel therefore reads
K(x
, x
; T) =
l=0
N=1
e
i TE
N
/ h
N,l
(r
)
N,l
(r
)
+
l=0
_
0
dp e
i TE
p
/ h
p,l
(r
)
p,l
(r
) (5.43)
with wave functions as given in equations (5.37) and (5.41) and energy spectrum
equations (5.33, 5.34).
67
Important Examples
5.2. The 1/rPotential in R
3
 The Hydrogen Atom [27, 28, 41, 55, 57, 58]
We consider the Euclidean threedimensional space with the singular potential V (r)=
Z e
2
/r (r = x, x R
3
) with Z and e
2
as in the previous Section. This potential
corresponds in the space R
3
, of course, to the potential of a point charge and is thus
the kernel of the Poisson equation in R
3
. The classical Lagrangian has the form
L(x, x) =
m
2
x
2
+
Z e
2
r
. (5.44)
The path integral is given by
K(x
, x
; T) =
x(t
)=x
_
x(t
)=x
Dx(t) exp
_
i
h
_
t
_
m
2
x
2
+
Z e
2
r
_
dt
_
. (5.45)
This path integral was rst successfully solved (actually the Green function or resolvent
kernel) by Duru and Kleinert [27], followed by further contributions of Inomata [58]
and Duru and Kleinert [28], Ho and Inomata [55] Grinberg, Mara non and Vucetich
[41,42] and Kleinert [62].
The transformation in the twodimensional case corresponds to the twodimensional
realization of the KustaanheimoStiefel transformation and we must look for a general
ization. However, we have a the relevant space R
3
whereas the relevant Kustaanheimo
Stiefel transformation maps R
4
R
3
which means that the transformation in ques
tion is not onetoone. We have namely [28]
_
_
x
1
x
2
x
3
_
_
=
_
_
_
u
3
u
4
u
1
u
2
u
2
u
1
u
4
u
3
u
1
u
2
u
3
u
4
u
4
u
3
u
2
u
1
_
_
_
_
_
_
u
1
u
2
u
3
u
4
_
_
_
, (5.46)
or in matrix notation x = A u with x R
3
and u R
4
, respectively. Several
modications of the matrix A are used in the literature, e.g. [10,11]
A =
_
_
_
u
3
u
4
u
1
u
2
u
4
u
3
u
2
u
1
u
1
u
2
u
3
u
4
u
2
u
1
u
4
u
3
_
_
_, (5.46b)
and see [66] as well. The transformation has the property A
t
A = u
2
1
+u
2
2
+u
2
3
+u
2
4
=
r = x and no Jacobean exist. However, a fourth coordinate can be described by
x
4
(s) = 2
_
s
s
(u
4
u
1
u
3
u
2
+u
2
u
3
u
1
u
4
)d. (5.47)
Therefore we must circumvent this problem. The idea [27,58] goes at follows: We
consider the lattice formulation of equation (5.45) and introduce a factor one by
68
III.5.2 The 1/rPotential in R
3
 The Hydrogen Atom
means of
1 =
_
m
2 i hT
_
exp
_
m
2 i hT
(
)
2
_
= lim
N
_
m
2 i h
_N
2
N
j=1
_
d
(j)
exp
_
i m
2 h
(j)
_
(5.48)
which gives for equation (5.45)
K(x
, x
; T) =
_
lim
N
_
m
2 i h
_
2N
N1
j=1
_
d
3
x
(j)
_
d
(j)
exp
_
_
_
i
h
N
j=1
_
m
2
(
2
x
(j)
+
2
(j)
) +
Z e
2
r
(j)
_
_
_
_
(5.49)
with the tobedened quantity r
(j)
. We now realize the transformation A(u) on
midpoints [58] u
(j)
a
=
1
2
(u
(j)
a
+u
(j1)
a
) (we use in the following the abbreviation x
4
):
x
(j)
a
= 2
4
b=1
A
ab
( u
(j)
)u
(j)
b
(5.50)
We have
A
t
( u
(j)
) A( u
(j)
) = u
(j) 2
1
+ u
(j) 2
2
+ u
(j) 2
3
+ u
(j) 2
4
=: r
(j)
(5.51)
which denes r
(j)
. Furthermore
2
x
(j)
1
+
2
x
(j)
2
+
2
x
(j)
3
+
2
x
(j)
4
= 4 r
(j)
_
2
u
(j)
1
+
2
u
(j)
2
+
2
u
(j)
3
+
2
u
(j)
4
=: 4 r
(j)
2
u
(j)
. (5.52)
Innitesimal this has the form dx
(j)
a
= 2A
ab
( u
(j)
)du
(j)
a
(sums over repeated indices
understood) and the Jacobean of this transformation exists and is given by
(x
1
, x
2
, x
3
, )
(u
1
, u
2
, u
3
, u
4
)
= 2
4
r
(j) 2
. (5.53)
Thus we arrive at the transformed classical Lagrangian
L(u, u) = 2mu
2
u
2
+
Z e
2
u
2
. (5.54)
We now repeat the reasoning of the previous Section by observing that under the
timetransformation equation (5.22)
s(t) =
_
t
t
d
4r()
, s
= s(t
)
69
Important Examples
and its lattice denition 4 r
(j)
s
(j)
= 4 u
(j) 2
(j)
the measure in the path integral
transforms according to
N
j=1
_
m
2 i h
_
2
N1
j=1
(2 u
(j)
)
4
d
4
u
(j)
=
1
(4r
)
2
N
j=1
_
m
2 i h
(j)
_
2
N1
j=1
d
4
u
(j)
. (5.55)
Respecting again equation (II.4.35a) which produces a factor 4r
, x
; T) =
1
2 i h
_
dE e
i TE/ h
G(x
, x
; E)
G(x
, x
; E) = i
_
0
ds
e
4 i Z e
2
s
/ h
K(u
, u
; s
)
(5.56)
where the spacetime transformed path integral
K is given by
K(u
, u
; s
)
=
1
4r
lim
N
_
m
2 i h
_
2N
N1
j=1
_
d
4
u
(j)
exp
_
_
i
h
N
j=1
_
m
2
2
u
(j)
+ 4E u
(j) 2
_
_
_
=
_
m
2 i hsin s
_
2
_
4r
exp
_
m
2 i h
_
(u
2
+ u
2
) cot s
2
u
sin s
__
.
(5.57)
Here we have used once again the known solution for the harmonic oscillator, where
we have actually a fourdimensional isotropic harmonic oscillator with frequency
=
_
8E/m. Note that the factor 1/r
(3)
Z e
2
r
E. (5.58)
Let us write H
E
in the coordinates:
u
1
= ucos cos
u
2
= ucos sin
u
3
= usincos
u
4
= usinsin
(u = u =
r, =
2
, = )
(0 , 0 2)
_
_
(5.59)
70
III.5.2 The 1/rPotential in R
3
 The Hydrogen Atom
Then the Schr odinger equation in polar coordinates
_
h
2
2
_
2
r
2
+
2
r
r
+
1
r
2
L
2
_
Z e
2
r
E
_
(r, , ) = 0 (5.60)
is transformed into
_
h
2
2
1
4s
2
_
2
s
2
+
3
s
s
4K
2
_
Z e
2
s
2
E
_
(u) = 0 (5.61)
with
K
2
=
2
2
(tan cot )
1
sin
2
2
cos
2
2
(5.62)
is the Casimiroperator of the group SO(4). Writing back into u
1
, . . . , u
4
we get for
H
E
in the coordinates q R
4
:
H = 4u
2
H
E
=
1
2m
4
4Z e
2
4Eu
2
and with p
u
k
= i h/u
k
:
H
eff
(p
u
, q) =
1
2m
4
k=1
p
2
u
k
4Z e
2
4Eu
2
. (5.63)
and no quantum correction appears. Therefore equation (5.57) is correct.
To perform the
r sin
2
cos
+
2
u
2
=
r sin
2
sin
+
2
u
3
=
r cos
2
cos
2
u
4
=
r cos
2
sin
2
_
_
_
0
0 2
0 4
_
_
_
. (5.64)
We have with equation (5.47)
(s) =
_
s
0
(
cos
)r()d. (5.65)
The polar coordinates give the expansion
u
_
sin
2
sin
2
cos
_
2
_
+ cos
2
cos
2
cos
_
2
__
(5.66)
71
Important Examples
Using the expansion
e
z cos
=
=
e
i
I
(z) (5.67)
twice, respecting due to the explicit form of (s) from equation (5.65) above
_
d(s
)
r
=
_
4
0
d (5.68)
and that the integration over
yields 4
2
we get for the resolvent kernel:
G(x
, x
; E) =
i
_
0
ds
_
m
2 i hsin s
_
2
exp
_
4 i Z e
2
s
h
m
2 i h
(r
+r
) cot s
=
e
i (
)
I
_
m
i hsin s
sin
2
sin
2
_
I
_
m
i hsin s
cos
2
cos
2
_
. (5.69)
The last sum can be exactly performed with the help of
_
z
1
z
2
e
i
z
1
z
2
e
i
_
2
I
_
_
z
2
1
+z
2
2
2z
1
z
2
cos
_
=
n=
(1)
n
I
n
(z
2
)I
+n
(z
1
) e
i n
,
(5.70)
in particular
=
e
i
I
(z)I
(z
) = I
0
_
_
z
2
+ z
2
+ 2zz
cos
_
, (5.71)
and the trigonometric expressions sin
2
2
=
1
2
(1 cos ) and cos
2
2
=
1
2
(1 + cos ).
Thus
G(x
, x
; E) =
i
_
0
ds
_
m
2 i hsin s
_
2
exp
_
4 i Z e
2
s
h
m
2 i h
(r
+r
) cot s
_
I
0
_
m
i hsins
cos
2
_
, (5.72)
where cos = cos
cos
+ sin
sin
cos(
). The I
0
Bessel function can be
expanded in terms of Legendrepolynomials:
I
0
_
z cos
2
_
=
2
z
l=0
(2l + 1)P
l
(cos )I
2l+1
(z). (5.73)
This relation can be derived from the general expansion
_
kz
2
_
(kz) = k
l=0
( + l)
l!(1 +)
(1)
l
(2l + )
2
F
1
(l, l + ; 1 + ; k
2
)I
2l+
(z).
(5.74)
72
III.5.2 The 1/rPotential in R
3
 The Hydrogen Atom
Equation (5.73) is recovered with the identications = 1, = 0, k = cos
2
and
P
l
(z) = (1)
l
2
F
1
(l, l + 1; 1;
z+1
2
). Thus the resolvent kernel can be expanded
according to
G(x
, x
; E) = G(r
, r
; E)
=
1
4
l=0
(2l + 1)P
l
(cos )G
l
(r
, r
; E) (5.75)
=
l=0
l
n=l
Y
n
l
(
)Y
n
l
(
)G
l
(r
, r
; E),
(5.76)
where the radial Green function G
l
(E) is given by
G
l
(r
, r
; E)
=
2m
h
_
0
ds
sin s
exp
_
4 i Z e
2
s
h
m
2 i h
(r
+r
) cot s
_
I
2l+1
_
m
i hsin s
_
=
1
r
m
2E
1
(2l + 1)!
_
1 + l +
i Z e
2
h
_
m
2E
_
W
Z e
2
h
m
2E
,l+
1
2
_
_
8mE
h
2
r
>
_
M
Z e
2
h
m
2E
,l+
1
2
_
_
8mE
h
2
r
<
_
. (5.77)
From the poles of the function at z = n
r
= 0, 1, 2, . . . we read o the bound
state energy levels which are given by
E
N
=
mZ
2
e
4
2 h
2
N
2
, (N = n
r
+ l + 1 = 1, 2, 3, . . . ) (5.78)
which are the wellknown Balmer levels.
The determination of the wave functions is analogous to the previous two
dimensional case and thus we only state the result for the bound state wave
functions of the hydrogen atom:
N,l,n
(r, , ) =
2
N
2
_
(N l 1)!
a
3
(N +l)!
_1
2
exp
_
r
aN
__
2r
aN
_
l
L
(2l+1)
Nl1
_
2r
aN
_
Y
n
l
(, ).
(5.79)
A quite complicated attempt was made by Grinberg, Mara non and Vucetich [41]
to determine these functions from the wave functions of the corresponding four
dimensional oscillator. The continuous state wave functions of the hydrogen
atom read as:
p,l,n
(r, , ) =
1
2(2l + 1)!r
_
1 +l +
i
ap
_
exp
_
2ap
_
M i
ap
,l+
1
2
(2 i pr)Y
n
l
(, ).
(5.80)
73
Important Examples
Of course, these wave functions form a complete set. The spectrum of the continuous
states is, of course, given by
E
p
=
h
2
p
2
2m
, (p > 0). (5.81)
These results coincides with the operator approach. The complete Feynman kernel
therefore reads
K(x
, x
; T) =
l=0
N=1
e
i TE
N
/ h
N,l
(r
)
N,l
(r
)
+
l=0
_
0
dp e
i TE
p
/ h
p,l
(r
)
p,l
(r
) (5.82)
with wave functions as given in equations (5.79) and (5.80) and energy spectrum
equations (5.78) and (5.81), respectively.
5.3. Coulomb Potential and 1/rPotential in D Dimensions [15, 55, 91]
In this Section we discuss the 1/rpotential in D dimensions. For D = 3 we have, of
course, the Coulomb problem. The whole calculation is quite similar as in the previous
cases, we just have to use a KustaanheimoStiefel transformation in one dimension.
The Ddimensional path integral problem was rst discussed by Chetouani and
Hammann [15], whereas the radial problem by Ho and Inomata [55] and [91].
We start with the Ddimensional path integral with the singular potential V (r) =
q
1
q
2
/r, where r = x (x R
D
):
K(x
, x
; T) =
x(t
)=x
_
x(t
)=x
Dx(t) exp
_
i
h
_
t
_
m
2
x
2
+
q
1
q
2
x
_
dt
_
. (5.83)
We denote the coupling by q
1
q
2
to emphasize the possibility that two charges q
1
and q
2
can interact which each other. As we have studied very explicitly in Section
III.3.1, the angular variables can be integrated out yielding
K(x
, x
; T) =
l=0
S
(D)
l
({
})S
(D)
l
({
})K
l
(r
, r
; T), (5.84)
where the radial kernel K
l
(T) is given by
K
l
(r
, r
; T)
= (r
)
1D
2
r(t
)=r
_
r(t
)=r
Dr(t) exp
_
i
h
_
t
_
m
2
r
2
h
2
(l +
D
2
1)
2
1
4
2mr
2
+
q
1
q
2
r
_
dt
_
(r
)
1D
2
r(t
)=r
_
r(t
)=r
Dr(t)
l+
D
2
1
[r
2
] exp
_
i
h
_
t
_
m
2
r
2
+
q
1
q
2
r
_
dt
_
. (5.85)
74
III.5.3 Coulomb Potential and 1/rPotential in D Dimensions
The S
(D)
l
({}) are the hyperspherical harmonics on the S
D1
sphere. The correspond
ing Hamiltonian to the path integral (5.85) has the form
H =
h
2
2m
_
d
2
dr
2
+
D1
r
d
dr
_
+ h
2
l(l + D2)
2mr
2
q
1
q
2
r
=
1
2m
p
2
r
+ h
2
(l +
D
2
1)
2
1
4
2mr
2
q
1
q
2
r
(5.86)
with the momentum operators equation (3.45). We now perform the spacetime
transformation
s(t) =
_
t
t
d
4r()
, s
= s(t
), r = F(u) = u
2
(5.87)
with f = 4u
2
, thus that F
2
= f and we get the spacetime formed Hamiltonian
H =
1
2m
p
2
u
+ h
2
(2l +D 2)
2
1
4
2mu
2
4Eu
2
4q
1
q
2
(5.88)
with the momentum operator
p
u
=
h
i
_
d
du
+
2D3
2u
_
. (5.89)
Here we have applied the results of spacetime transformations for onedimensional
Hamiltonians. Thus we get the transformation formul
K
l
(r
, r
; T) =
1
2 i h
_
dE e
i TE/ h
G
l
(r
, r
; E)
G
l
(r
, r
; E) = 2 i(u
)
3
2
D
_
0
ds
e
4 i q
1
q
2
s
/ h
K
l
(u
, u
; s
),
(5.90)
where the kernel
K
l
(s
) is given by
K
l
(u
, u
; s
)
=
u(t
)=u
_
u(t
)=u
Du(s)
2l+D2
[u
2
] exp
_
i
h
_
s
0
_
m
2
u
2
+ 4Eu
2
_
ds
_
=
m
i hsin T
exp
_
m
2 i h
(u
2
+ u
2
) cot T
_
I
2l+D2
_
mu
i hsinT
_
, (5.91)
with =
_
8E/m. The Green function we obtain in the usual way with the result
G
l
(r
, r
; E)
= (r
)
2D
2
2m
h
_
0
ds
sin s
exp
_
4 i q
1
q
2
s
h
m
2 hi
(r
+ r
) cot s
_
I
2l+D2
_
m
i hsin s
_
= (r
)
1D
2
_
m
2E
_
l +
D1
2
q
1
q
2
h
_
m
2E
_
(2l +D 2)!
Wq
1
q
2
h
m
2E
,l+
D2
2
_
_
8mE
h
2
r
>
_
Mq
1
q
2
h
m
2E
,l+
D2
2
_
_
8mE
h
2
r
<
_
. (5.92)
75
Important Examples
Thus it is easy to display the wave functions and spectrum for the discrete contribution
for the Ddimensional 1/rproblem [a = h
2
/(mq
1
q
2
), n N]:
N,l
(r, {}) =
_
1
2(N +
D3
2
)
(N l 1)!
(N + l +D 3)!
_1
2
_
2
a(N +
D3
2
)
_
D/2
_
2r
a(N +
D3
2
)
_
l
exp
_
r
a(N +
D3
2
)
_
L
(2l+D2)
Nl1
_
2r
a(N +
D3
2
)
_
S
(D)
l
({})
(5.93a)
= (1)
Nl1
_
1
N +
D3
2
__
1
a(N +l + D3)!(N L 1)!
_1
2
r
D1
2
W
N+
D3
2
,l+
D2
2
_
2r
a(N +
D3
2
)
_
S
(D)
l
({})
(5.93b)
E
N
=
mq
2
1
q
2
2
2 h
2
(N +
D3
2
)
2
, (N = 1, 2, . . . ) (5.94)
For the continuous spectrum we get similarly
p,l
(r, {}) = r
1D
2
_
l +
D1
2
+
i
ap
_
2(2l + D2)!
exp
_
mq
2
1
q
2
2
2 h
2
p
_
M i
ap
,l+
D2
2
(2 i pr)S
(D)
l
({}) (5.95)
with E
p
=
h
2
p
2
2m
. The complete Green function thus has the form
G(x
, x
; E) =
N=1
l=0
exp
_
i T
mq
2
1
q
2
2
2 h
3
(N +
D3
2
)
2
_
N,l
(r
, {
})
N,l
(r
, {
})
+
l=0
_
0
exp
_
i hT
p
2
2m
_
p,l
(r
, {
})
p,l
(r
, {
}). (5.96)
Finally we can state the following path integral identity
_
=
_
8E/m
_
:
_
Dr(t)
[r
2
] exp
_
i
h
_
t
_
m
2
r
2
+
r
_
dt
_
=
2m
i h
_
dE e
i TE h
_
0
ds
sin s
exp
_
4is
h
m
2 i h
(r
+r
) cot s
_
I
2
_
m
r
i hsin s
_
= i h
_
dE e
i TE/ h
_
m
2E
( +
1
2
q
1
q
2
h
_
m
2E
)
(2 + 1)
76
III.5.3 Coulomb Potential and 1/rPotential in D Dimensions
Wq
1
q
2
h
m
2E
,
_
_
8mE
h
2
r
>
_
Mq
1
q
2
h
m
2E
,
_
_
8mE
h
2
r
<
_
= i h
_
0
dE e
i TE
_
n=0
1
E
n
E
n
(r
)
n
(r
) +
_
dp
E
p
E
p
(r
)
p
(r
).
_
(5.97)
The discrete state wave functions and energy spectrum are given by (a = h
2
/mq
1
q
2
)
n
(r) =
1
n + +
1
2
_
n!
a(n + 2 + 1)
_1
2
_
2r
a(n + +
1
2
)
_
+
1
2
exp
_
r
a(n + +
1
2
)
_
L
(2)
n
_
2r
a(n + +
1
2
)
_
(5.98a)
=
(1)
n
n + +
1
2
_
1
an!(n + 2 + 1)
_1
2
W
n++
1
2
,
_
2r
a(n + +
1
2
)
_
(5.98b)
E
n
=
m
2
2 h
2
(n + +
1
2
)
2
. (5.99)
For the continuous states we have similarly for the wave functions and the energy
spectrum
p
(r) =
_
1
2
( +
1
2
i
ap
)
(2 + 1)
exp
_
2ap
_
M i
ap
,
(2 i pr) (5.100)
with E
p
=
h
2
p
2
2m
. In particular this gives the identities
m
i hk
(
1
2
+ )
(1 + 2)
W
,
(2 i kr
>
)M
,
(2 i kr
<
)
=
m
hk
n
n!
(n + 2 + 1)
1
n + +
1
2
exp
_
k(r
+ r
)
_
(4k
2
r
)
+
1
2
L
(2)
n
(2kr
)L
(2)
n
(2kr
)
+
1
2
m
hk
_
dp e
p
p i
(
1
2
+ + ip)(
1
2
+ i p)
2
(1 + 2)
M
i p,
(2 i kr
)M
i p,
(2 i kr
), (5.101)
or alternatively (and explicitly, = (q
1
q
2
/h)
_
m/2E)
_
m
2E
(
1
2
+ )
(1 + 2)
W
,
_
_
8mE
h
2
r
>
_
M
,
_
_
8mE
h
2
r
<
_
= h
n=1
1
E
n
E
n
(r
)
n
(r
) + h
_
0
dp
E
p
E
p
(r
)
p
(r
). (5.102)
77
Important Examples
Let us note that it is not dicult to analyze the Green function by taking the n
th
residuum in equation (5.92). Using the appropriate expansion for the function again
we get
G(r
, r
; E) =
n=0
(1)
n
n!
1
n +
1
2
+
q
1
q
2
h
_
m
2E
n
_
m
2E
n
1
(2 + 1)
W
n++
1
2
,
_
2r
>
a(n + +
1
2
)
_
M
n++
1
2
,
_
2r
<
a(n + +
1
2
)
_
+ regular terms (5.103)
which gives using the relations of the Whittakerfunctions with the Laguerrepolyno
mials the wave functions (5.92) and the energy spectrum (5.94). In particular we have
for D = 1
n
(x) =
_
1
an
3
_1
2
2r
an
e
r/an
L
(1)
n
_
2r
an
_
, (5.104)
E
n
=
mZ
2
e
4
2 h
2
n
2
, n N (5.105)
p
(x) =
1
_
1
i
ap
_
e
/2ap
M i
ap
,
1
2
(2 i pr). (5.106)
Because, the domains x < 0 and x > 0 are separated the wavefunctions (5.104,5.106)
are doubly degenerated.
We can study several special cases (see [15]):
i) We rst consider D = 2 and get
G(x
, x
; E)
=
(r
1
2
2
_
m
2E
l=
_
l
i q
1
q
2
h
_
m
2E
_
(2l)!
e
i l(
)
Wi q
1
q
2
h
m
2E
,l
_
_
8mE
h
2
r
>
_
M
i q
1
q
2
h
m
2E
,l
_
_
8mE
h
2
r
<
_
=
2m
h
_
0
du
sinh u
exp
_
q
1
q
2
h
_
2m
E
u
2mE
h
(r
+r
) cothu
_
1
2
l=
e
i l(
)
I
2l
_
2
2mE
hsinh u
_
=
m
h
_
0
du
sinh u
cosh
_
8mE
hsinh u
cos
2
_
.
exp
_
q
1
q
2
h
_
2m
E
u
_
2mE
h
2
(r
+ r
) cosh u
_
. (5.107)
This is equivalent with equation (5.29).
78
III.5.3 Coulomb Potential and 1/rPotential in D Dimensions
ii) We consider D arbitrary. The Green function reads in the integral representation,
where we expand in addition the hyperspherical harmonics in terms of Gegenbauer
polynomials
G(x
, x
; E) =
2m
h
(r
)
2D
2
_
0
du
sinh u
exp
_
q
1
q
2
h
_
2m
E
u
2mE
h
(r
+r
) cothu
_
l=0
(2l +D 2)(
D2
2
)
4
D/2
C
D2
2
l
(cos
(1,2)
)I
2l+D2
_
2
2mE
hsinh u
_
. (5.108)
The lsummation can be performed by means of equation (5.74) and taking into
account that we have for the Gegenbauerpolynomials
C
n
(cos ) =
(n + 2)
n!(2)
2
F
1
_
2 +n, n; +
1
2
; sin
2
2
_
= (1)
n
(n + 2)
n!(2)
2
F
1
_
2 +n, n; +
1
2
; cos
2
2
_
.
(5.109)
Thus we get
G(x
, x
; E)
=
2m
h
(r
)
2D
2
(4)
1D
2
_
0
du
sinh u
exp
_
q
1
q
2
h
_
2m
E
u
2mE
h
(r
+r
) cothu
_
l=0
(1)
l
(2l + D2)
(l + D2)
l!(
D1
2
)
2
F
1
_
l + D2, l;
D1
2
; cos
2
(1,2)
2
_
I
2l+d2
_
2
2mE
hsinh u
_
=
2m
h
_
4h
2mE
_
1D
2
_
cos
(1,2)
2
_
3D
2
_
0
du
(sinh u)
D+1
2
exp
_
q
1
q
2
h
_
2m
E
u
2mE
h
(r
+r
) cothu
_
ID3
2
_
2
2mE
hsinh u
cos
(1,2)
2
_
(5.110)
Alternatively this can be written as
G(x
, x
; E)
=
2m
h
_
4h
2mE
_
1D
2
_
r
+x
2
_
3D
4
_
0
du
(sinh u)
D+1
2
exp
_
q
1
q
2
h
_
2m
E
u
2mE
h
(r
+r
) cothu
_
ID3
2
_
2
2mE
hsinh u
_
r
+ x
2
_
=
m
h
_
2h
2mE
_
1D
2
(x
2
y
2
)
3D
4
_
0
du
(sinh u)
D+1
2
exp
_
q
1
q
2
h
_
2m
E
u
2mE
h
x cothu
_
ID3
2
_
2mE
_
x
2
y
2
hsinh u
_
, (5.111)
79
Important Examples
where x = r
+ r
and y = x
1
2
(z) = (2/z)
1
2
cosh z.
D = 1 yields with
(1,2)
2:
G(x
, x
; E)
=
2m
h
_
0
du
sinh u
exp
_
q
1
q
2
h
_
2m
E
u
2mE
h
(x
+x
) cothu
_
I
1
_
2
2mE
hsinh u
_
=
_
m
2E
_
1
q
1
q
2
h
_
m
2E
_
Wq
1
q
2
h
m
2E
,
1
2
_
_
8mE
h
2
r
>
_
Mq
1
q
2
h
m
2E
,
1
2
_
_
8mE
h
2
r
<
_
. (5.112)
Furthermore one can show, by using the relation:
_
d
zdz
_
m
_
I
(z)
z
_
=
I
+m
(z)
z
+m
that the Ddimensional Green function for the 1/rpotential is connected with the
(D2)dimensional Green function by the relation
G
D
(xy; E) =
1
2y
y
G
D2
(xy; E). (5.113)
Therefore
G
D
(xy; E) =
_
2yy
_
D1
2
G
1
(xy; E), D = 1, 3, 5, . . . ,
(5.114)
G
D
(xy; E) =
_
2yy
_
D2
2
G
2
(xy; E), D = 2, 4, 6, . . . .
(5.115)
80
III.5.5 Axially Symmetric CoulombLike Potential
5.4. Axially Symmetric CoulombLike Potential [713, 4648, 88, 89]
It is possible to consider the even more complicated potential problem, namely [46]
L
Cl
=
m
2
( x
2
+ y
2
+ z
2
) +
q
2
_
x
2
+ y
2
+ z
2
bh
2
2m
1
x
2
+y
2
ch
2
2m
z
(x
2
+ y
2
)
_
x
2
+y
2
+z
2
(5.116a)
=
m
2
( r
2
+ r
2
2
+r
2
sin
2
2
) +
q
2
r
bh
2
2mr
2
sin
2
ch
2
2m
cos
r
2
sin
2
(5.116b)
=
m
2
(
2
+
2
)(
2
+
2
) +
m
2
2
2
+
2q
2
2
+
2
bh
2
2m
2
2
ch
2
m
2
(
2
+
2
)
.
(5.116c)
Here I have displayed the corresponding classical Lagrangian in cartesian, polar and
parabolic coordinates. It belongs to the class of potentials mentioned long ago by
Makarov, Smorodinsky, Valiev and Winternitz [71] which are separable in a specic
coordinate system and furthermore exactly solvable. This potential was discussed by
CarpioBernido, Bernido and Inomata [10] starting from cartesian coordinates and
using the fourdimensional realization of the KustaanheimoStiefel transformation.
However, this potential is separable in polar as well as parabolic coordinates and we
shall give the explicit calculation for all of them.
1) Cartesian coordinates
In our line of reasoning we follow reference [10], however with some simplications be
cause we have already discussed the realization of the fourdimensional Kustaanheimo
Stiefel in the discussion of the hydrogen atom. We consider the path integral repre
sentation corresponding to equation (5.116b)
K(x
, x
; T) = lim
N
_
m
2 i h
_3N
2
N1
j=1
_
dx
(j)
dy
(j)
dz
(j)
exp
_
_
_
i
h
N
j=1
_
m
2
(
2
x
(j)
+
2
y
(j)
+
2
z
(j)
) +
q
2
r
(j)
bh
2
2m
1
r
(j) 2
z
(j) 2
ch
2
2m
z
(j)
r
(j)
(r
(j) 2
z
(j) 2
)
_
_
_
_
. (5.117)
Similarly to equation (5.45) we insert a factor one
1 = lim
N
_
m
2 i h
_N
2
N
j=1
_
d
(j)
exp
_
i m
2h
(j)
_
. (5.118)
81
Important Examples
We repeat the steps from equations (5.49) to (5.57), i.e. we realise the fourdimensional
KustaanheimoStiefel transformation on midpoints and arrive together with the
transformation formul
K(x
, x
; T) =
1
2 i h
_
dE e
i TE/ h
G(x
, x
; E)
G(x
, x
; E) = i
_
0
ds
e
4 i q
2
s
/ h
K(u
, u
; s
),
(5.119)
with the transformed path integral
K(u
, u
; s
) =
1
4r
K
1
(u
1
, u
1
, u
2
, u
2
; s
)
K
2
(u
3
, u
3
, u
4
, u
4
; s
), (5.120)
and the kernels K
1
(s
), K
2
(s
K
1
(u
1
, u
1
, u
2
, u
2
; s
)
=
u
1
(t
)=u
1
_
u
1
(t
)=u
1
Du
1
(s)
u
2
(t
)=u
2
_
u
2
(t
)=u
2
Du
2
(s)
exp
_
i
h
_
s
0
_
m
2
( u
2
1
+ u
2
2
) + 4E(u
2
1
+ u
2
2
)
(b +c) h
2
2m(u
2
1
+u
2
2
)
_
ds
_
=
1
(t
)=
1
_
1
(t
)=
1
D
1
(s)
1
(t
)=
1
_
1
(t
)=
1
D
1
(s)
exp
_
i
h
_
s
0
_
m
2
(
2
1
+
2
1
2
1
) + 4E
2
1
h
2
b + c
1
4
2m
2
1
_
ds
_
(5.121)
=
1
2
_
1
=
e
i
1
(
1
)
1
(t
)=
1
_
1
(t
)=
1
D
1
(s) exp
_
i
h
_
s
0
_
m
2
2
1
+ 4E
2
1
h
2
b +c +
2
1
4
2m
2
1
_
ds
_
=
m
2 i hsin s
1
=
e
i
1
(
1
)
exp
_
m
2 i h
(
1
2
+
1
2
) cot s
_
I
1
_
m
1
i hsin s
_
. (5.122)
Here we have introduced twodimensional polar coordinates u
1
=
1
cos
1
, u
2
=
1
sin
1
, separated the
1
and the
1
path integration in the usual way, applied
82
III.5.5 Axially Symmetric CoulombLike Potential
the solution of the radial harmonic oscillator and have used the abbreviations =
_
8E/m,
1
= +
2
+ b + c. Similarly
K
2
(u
3
, u
3
, u
4
, u
4
; s
) =
m
2 i hsin s
2
=
e
i
2
(
2
)
exp
_
m
2 i h
(
2
2
+
2
2
) cot s
_
I
2
_
m
2
i hsin s
_
(5.123)
with u
3
=
2
cos
2
, u
4
=
2
sin
2
,
2
= +
2
+ b c. We identify variables [Cayley
Klein parameters, c.f.equation (5.59)]
1
=
r cos
2
1
=
+
2
2
=
r sin
2
2
=
2
(5.124)
(0 , 0 2, 0 4, d
= r
, x
; E) =
i
_
0
ds
_
m
2 i hsin s
_
2
exp
_
4 i q
2
s
h
m
2 i h
(r
+ r
) cot s
=
e
i (
)
I
1
_
m
i hsin s
sin
2
sin
2
_
I
2
_
m
i hsin s
cos
2
cos
2
_
.
(5.125)
(Compare with equation (5.69)). Using the addition theorem [31, Vol.II, p.99]:
z
2
J
(z cos cos )J
(z sin sin)
= (sin sin )
(cos cos )
l=0
(1)
l
( + + 2l + 1)
( + +l + 1)( + l + 1)
l!
2
( + 1)(l + + 1)
J
++2l+1
(z)
2
F
1
(l, + + l + 1; + 1; sin
2
)
2
F
1
(l, + +l + 1; + 1; sin
2
).
(5.126)
we get in the usual way by performing he s
integration
G(x
, x
; E)
=
1
2
=
e
i (
)
_
sin
2
sin
2
_
1
_
cos
2
cos
2
_
l=0
(
1
+
2
+ 2l + 1)
(
1
+
2
+ l + 1)(
1
+l + 1)
l!
2
(
1
+ 1)(
2
+ l + 1)
83
Important Examples
2
F
1
_
l,
1
+
2
+ l + 1;
1
+ 1; sin
2
2
_
2
F
1
_
l,
1
+
2
+ l + 1;
1
+ 1; sin
2
2
_
h
_
0
ds
sin s
e
4 i q
2
s
/ h
exp
_
m
2 i h
(r
+r
) cot s
_
I
1
+
2
+2l+1
_
m
i hsin s
_
=
1
2
=
e
i (
l=0
(
1
+
2
+ 2l + 1)
2
(
1
+
2
+l + 1)l!
(
1
+ l + 1)(
2
+ l + 1)
_
sin
2
sin
2
_
1
_
cos
2
cos
2
_
2
P
(
1
,
2
)
l
(cos
)P
(
1
,
2
)
l
(cos
1
r
m
2E
[
1
2
(
1
+
2
) + l + 1 p]
(
1
+
2
+ 2l + 2)
W
p,l+
1+
1
+
2
2
(2 i kr
>
)M
p,l+
1+
1
+
2
2
(2 i kr
<
). (5.127)
with the abbreviations p = q
2
_
m/2Eh
2
, k =
, x
; T)
=
r(t
)=r
_
r(t
)=r
Dr(t)
(t
)=
_
(t
)=
sin D(t)
(t
)=
_
(t
)=
D(t)
exp
_
i
h
_
t
_
m
2
( r
2
+r
2
2
+ r
2
sin
2
2
)
+
q
2
r
bh
2
2mr
2
sin
2
ch
2
2m
cos
r
2
sin
2
+
h
2
8m
_
1 +
1
sin
2
__
dt
_
=
1
2
=
e
i (
)
K
(r
, r
; T) (5.129)
with the kernel K
(r
, r
; T)
84
III.5.5 Axially Symmetric CoulombLike Potential
= (r
sin
sin
1
2
r(t
)=r
_
r(t
)=r
Dr(t)
(t
)=
_
(t
)=
D(t)
exp
_
i
h
_
t
_
m
2
( r
2
+r
2
2
) h
2
2
+ b + c cos
1
4
2mr
2
sin
2
+
q
2
r
+
h
2
8mr
2
_
dt
_
= (r
sin
sin
1
2
r(t
)=r
_
r(t
)=r
rDr(t)
(t
)=
_
(t
)=
D(t) exp
_
i
h
_
t
_
m
2
r
2
+
4m
2
r
2
_
2
_
2
h
2
2
+b + c
1
4
8mr
2
sin
2
h
2
2
+ b c
1
4
8mr
2
cos
2
+
q
2
r
+
h
2
8mr
2
_
dt
_
=
l=0
(
1
,
2
)
l
(
)
(
1
,
2
)
l
(
)K
l
(r
, r
; T), (5.130)
the (PoschlTeller) wave functions
(
2
,
1
)
l
() =
_
1
+
2
+ 2l + 1
2
1+
1
+
2
l! (
1
+
2
+ l + 1)
(
1
+ l + 1)(
2
+ l + 1)
_1
2
(1 cos )
1
2
(1 + cos )
2
2
P
(
1
,
2
)
l
(cos ), (5.131)
(
1,2
as before) and the radial path integral
K
l
(r
, r
; T) =
1
r
r(t
)=r
_
r(t
)=r
Dr(t) exp
_
i
h
_
t
_
m
2
r
2
+
q
2
r
h
2
1
4
2mr
2
_
dt
_
(5.132)
_
=
1
2
(
1
+
2
+2l +1]
(r
, r
; E) =
1
r
m
2E
( + 1 p)
(2 + 2)
W
p,+
1
2
(2 i kr
>
)M
p,+
1
2
(2 i kr
<
).
(5.133)
The energy spectrum was already stated in equation (5.128) and the corresponding
85
Important Examples
wave functions are
(r, , ) =
e
i
(
1
,
2
)
l
()
_
2
(n + +
1
2
)
2
_
n!
a
3
(n + +
1
2
)(n + 2 + 2)
_1
2
_
2r
a(n + +
1
2
)
_
exp
_
r
a(n + +
1
2
)
_
L
(2+1)
n
_
2r
a(n + +
1
2
)
_
_
1
2
( +
1
2
+
i
ap
)
r(2 + 2)
exp
_
2ap
_
M i
ap
,+
1
2
(2 i pr)
(5.134)
and a denotes the Bohr radius.
3) Parabolic coordinates
The potential described in equation (5.116c) is also separable in parabolic coordinates,
in the operator approach as well in the path integral formalism. We consider the path
integral formulation corresponding to the Lagrangian (5.116c):
K(x
, x
; T) K(
; T)
=
(t
)=
_
(t
)=
D(t)
(t
)=
_
(t
)=
D(t)(
2
+
2
)
(t
)=
_
(t
)=
D(t)
exp
_
i
h
_
t
_
m
2
(
2
+
2
)(
2
+
2
) +
m
2
2
2
+
2q
2
2
+
2
h
2
(b
1
4
)
2m
2
2
ch
2
m
2
(
2
+
2
)
_
dt
_
=
1
2
=
e
i (
)
K
; T) (5.135)
with the kernel K
(T)
K
; T) = (
1
2
(t
)=
_
(t
)=
D(t)
(t
)=
_
(t
)=
D(
2
+
2
)
exp
_
i
h
_
t
_
m
2
(
2
+
2
)(
2
+
2
)
+
2q
2
2
+
2
h
2
b +
2
1
4
2m
2
2
ch
2
m
2
(
2
+
2
)
_
dt
_
(5.136)
This path integral is now tracked by a timetransformation according to
=
2
(j)
+
2
(j)
, s(t) =
_
t
t
2
() +
2
()
, (5.137)
86
III.5.5 Axially Symmetric CoulombLike Potential
therefore
K
; T) =
1
2 i h
_
dE e
i ET/ h
G
; E)
G
; E) = i
_
0
ds
e
2 i q
2
s
/ h
K
; s
)
(5.138)
with (note that this is a twodimensional timetransformation and the prefactor is
one):
; s
) =
K
1
(
; s
)
K
2
(
; s
). (5.139)
This gives for the kernels
K
1,2
(s
K
1
(
; s
) =
1
(t
)=
_
(t
)=
1
[
2
]D(s) exp
_
i
h
_
s
0
_
m
2
2
+E
2
_
ds
_
=
m
i hsin s
exp
_
m
2 i h
(
2
+
2
) cot s
_
I
1
_
m
i hsin s
_
(5.140)
with =
_
2E/m,
1
= +
2
+ b +c. Similarly for
K
2
(s
K
2
(
; s
) =
1
(t
)=
_
(t
)=
2
[
2
] exp
_
i
h
_
s
0
_
m
2
2
+ E
2
_
ds
_
=
m
i hsin s
exp
_
m
2 i h
(
2
+
2
) cot s
_
I
2
_
m
i hsin s
_
(5.141)
(
2
= +
2
+ b c). Integrating over s
yields
G
(bound)
(x
, x
; E) = h
n
1
,n
2
=0
N
(
)
N
(
)
E
N
E
(5.142)
with the energy spectrum (note = q
2
/hN)
E
N
=
mq
4
2 h
2
N
2
, N = n
1
+ n
2
+ 1 +
1
+
2
2
. (5.143)
The wave functions have the form
,n
1
,n
2
(, , ) =
e
i
2
_
2
a
2
N
3
2n
1
!n
2
!
(n
1
+
1
+ 1)(n
2
+
2
+ 1)
_1
2
_
aN
_
1
_
aN
_
2
exp
_
2
+
2
2aN
_
L
(
1
)
n
1
_
2
aN
_
L
(
2
)
n
2
_
2
aN
_
. (5.144)
87
Important Examples
For the continuous spectrum we obtain
G
(cont.)
(x
, x
; E) = h
=
_
0
dp
_
p,,
(
)
p,,
(
)
E
p
E
(5.145)
with
E
p
=
h
2
p
2
2m
(5.146)
and the wave functions
p,,
(, , ) =
e
i
(2)
3
2
[
1+
1
2
+
i
2
( +
i
ap
)][
1+
2
2
+
i
2
(
i
ap
)]
(1 +
1
)(1 +
2
)
M
i
2
(+
i
ap
),
1
2
(i p
2
)M
i
2
(
i
ap
),
2
2
(i p
2
). (5.147)
Finally we state the relation of the Green function in parabolic coordinates. We have
G(
; E) =
i
2
_
m
i h
_
2
=
e
i (
_
0
ds
sin
2
s
1
_
m
i hsin s
_
I
2
_
m
i hsin s
_
exp
_
2 i q
2
h
s
m
2 i h
(
2
+
2
+
2
+
2
) cot s
_
. (5.148)
Note the similarity to the u
1
, u
2
, u
3
, u
4
approach. Actually the KustaanheimoStiefel
approach in cartesian coordinates produces a separation in parabolic coordinates. We
switch bach to polar coordinates by means of
2
= r + z = r(1 + cos ) = 2r cos
2
2
2
= r z = r(1 cos ) = 2r sin
2
2
(5.149)
Using again the addition theorem (5.126) with a rescaling s
2s
, /2 so that
=
_
8E/m we recover the Green function (5.125).
Let us nally note that even more complicated Coulomblike potentials can be
exactly solved [47, 48] which are, however, only separable in parabolic coordinates.
88
Bibliography
BIBLIOGRAPHY
[1] S.Albeverio: Some Recent Developments and Applications of Path Integrals; in: M.C.Gutzwiller
et al.(eds.): Bielefeld Encounters in Physics and Mathematics VII; Path Integrals From meV to
MeV, 1985 (World Scientic, Singapore, 1986).
[2] S.Albeverio, P.Blanchard and R.HeghKrohn: Some Applications of Functional Integration;
in Mathematical Problems in Theoretical Physics, p.265 (Eds.: R.Schrader, R.Seider, and
D.A.Uhlenbrock) Lecture Notes in Physics 153 (SpringerVerlag, Berlin, 1982).
[3] S.Albeverio, Ph.Combe, R.HeghKrohn, G.Rideau, M.SirgueCollin, M.Sirgue and R.Stora
(Eds.): Feynman Path Integrals, Lecture Notes in Physics 106 (SpringerVerlag, Berlin, 1979).
[4] A.M.Arthurs: Path Integrals in Polar Coordinates; Proc.Roy.Soc.(London) A 313 (1969) 445;
Path Integrals in Curvilinear Coordinates; Proc.Roy.Soc.(London) A 318 (1970) 523.
[5] M.B ohm and G.Junker: Path Integration Over Compact and Noncompact Rotation Groups;
J.Math.Phys. 28 (1987) 1978.
[6] D.P.L.Castrigiano and F.St ark: New Aspects of the Path Integrational Treatment of the Coulomb
Potential; J.Math.Phys. 30 (1989) 2785.
[7] M.V.CarpioBernido: Path Integral Quantization of Certain Noncentral Systems with Dynamical
Symmetries; J.Math.Phys. 32 (1991) 1799.
[8] M.V.CarpioBernido: Green Function for an Axially Symmetric Potential Field: A Path Integral
Evaluation in Polar Coordinates; J.Phys.A: Math.Gen. 24 (1991) 3013.
[9] M.V.CarpioBernido and C.C.Bernido: An Exact Solution of a RingShaped Oscillator Plus a
c sec
2
/r
2
Potential; Phys.Lett. A 134 (1989) 395.
[10] M.V.CarpioBernido, C.C.Bernido and A.Inomata: Exact Path Integral Treatment of Two
Classes of Axially Symmetric Potentials; in Third International Conference on Path Integrals
From meV to MeV, 1989, p.442; Eds.: V.Sayakanit et al.(World Scientic, Singapore, 1989).
[11] M.V.CarpioBernido and A.Inomata: Path Integral Treatment of the Hartmann Potential; in
Bielefeld Encounters in Physics and Mathematics VII; Path Integrals From meV to MeV,
1985; eds.:M.C.Gutzwiller et al.(World Scientic, Singapore, 1986).
[12] L.Chetouani, L.Guechi and T.F.Hammann: Exact Path Integral for the Ring Potential; Phys.
Lett. A 125 (1987) 277.
[13] L.Chetouani, L.Guechi and T.F.Hammann: Exact Path Integral Solution of the Coulomb Plus
AharonovBohm Potential; J.Math.Phys. 30 (1989) 655.
[14] L.Chetouani, L.Guechi and T.F.Hammann: Generalized Canonical Transformations and Path
Integrals; Phys.Rev. A 40 (1989) 1157.
[15] L.Chetouani and T.F.Hammann: Coulomb Greens Function, in a nDimensional Euclidean
Space; J.Math.Phys. 27 (1986) 2944.
[16] R.De, R.Dutt and U.Sukhatme: Mapping of Shape Invariant Potentials Under Point Canonical
Transformations; J.Phys.A: Math.Gen. 25 (1992), L 843.
[17] B.S.DeWitt: Dynamical Theory in Curved Spaces. I. A Review of the Classical and Quantum
Action Principles; Rev.Mod.Phys. 29 (1957) 377.
[18] C.DeWittMorette: Feynman Path Integrals: I.Linear and Ane Technique, II.The Feynman
Green Function; Commun.Math.Phys. 37 (1974) 63.
[19] C.DeWittMorette, A.Maheswari and B.Nelson: Path Integration in NonRelativistic Quantum
Mechanics; Phys.Rep. 50 (1979) 255.
[20] P.A.M.Dirac: The Lagrangian in Quantum Mechanics; Phys.Zeitschr.Sowjetunion 3 (1933) 64;
reprinted in: Quantum Electrodynamics (Ed.J.Schwinger) Dover, New York, 1958, p.312;
[21] J.C.DOlivio and M.Torres: The Canonical Formalism and Path Integrals in Curved Spaces;
J.Phys.A: Math.Gen. 21 (1988) 3355; The Weyl Ordering and Path Integrals in Curved Spaces;
Path Summation: Achievements and Goals, Trieste, 1987, p.481, eds: S.Lundquist et al. (World
Scientic, Singapore, 1988).
[22] J.S.Dowker: Covariant Feynman Derivation of Schr odingers Equation in a Riemannian Space;
J.Phys.A: Math., Nucl.Gen. 7 (1974) 1256.
[23] J.S.Dowker: Path Integrals and Ordering Rules: J.Math.Phys. 17 (1976) 1873.
[24] J.S.Dowker and I.W.Mayes: The Canonical Quantization of Chiral Dynamics; Nucl.Phys. B 29
(1971) 259.
89
Bibliography
[25] I.H.Duru: Path Integrals Over SU(2) Manifold and Related Potentials; Phys.Rev. D 30 (1984)
2121.
[26] I.H.Duru: On the Path Integral for the Potential V = ar
2
+br
2
; Phys.Lett. A 112 (1985) 421.
[27] I.H.Duru and H.Kleinert: Solution of the Path Integral for the HAtom; Phys.Lett. B 84 (1979)
185.
[28] I.H.Duru and H.Kleinert: Quantum Mechanics of HAtoms From Path Integrals; Fortschr.Phys.
30 (1982) 401.
[29] R.Dutt, A.Khare and U.P.Sukhatme: Supersymmetry, Shape Invariance, and Exactly Solvable
Potentials; Amer.J.Phys. 56 (1988), 163.
[30] S.F.Edwards and Y.V.Gulyaev: Path Integrals in Polar Coordinates; Proc.Roy.Soc.(London) A
279 (1964) 229.
[31] A.Erdelyi, W.Magnus, F.Oberhettinger and F.G.Tricomi (Eds.): Higher Transcendental Func
tions, Vol.IIII (McGraw Hill, New York, 1955).
[32] R.P.Feynman: The Principle of Least Action in Quantum Mechanics; Ph.D.Thesis, Princeton
University, May 1942.
[33] R.P.Feynman: SpaceTime Approach to NonRelativistic Quantum Mechanics; Rev.Mod.Phys.
20 (1948) 367.
[34] R.P.Feynman and A.Hibbs: Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals (McGraw Hill, New York,
1965).
[35] W.Fischer, H.Leschke and P.M uller: Changing Dimension and Time: Two WellFounded and
Practical Techniques for Path Integration in Quantum Physics; Universitat ErlangenN urnberg
preprint, August 1991, J.Phys.A: Math.Gen. 25 (1992).
Path Integration in Quantum Physics by Changing the Drift of the Underlying Diusion Process;
Universitat ErlangenN urnberg preprint, February 1992.
[36] A.Frank and K.B.Wolf: Lie Algebras for Systems With Mixed Spectra.I. The Scattering P oschl
Teller Potential; J.Math.Phys. 25 (1985) 973.
[37] I.M.Gelfand and A.M.Jaglom: Die Integration in Funktionenr aumen und ihre Anwendung in
der Quantentheorie; Fortschr. Phys. 5 (1957) 517; Integration in Functional Spaces and its
Applications in Quantum Physics; J.Math.Phys. 1 (1960) 48.
[38] J.L.Gervais and A.Jevicki: Point Canonical Transformations in the Path Integral; Nucl.Phys.
B 110 (1976) 93.
[39] M.J.Goovaerts: PathIntegral Evaluation of a Nonstationary Calogero Model; J.Math.Phys. 16
(1975) 720.
[40] I.S.Gradshteyn and I.M.Ryzhik: Table of Integrals, Series, and Products (Academic Press, New
York, 1980).
[41] H.Grinberg, J.Mara non and H.Vucetich: Atomic Orbitals of the Nonrelativistic Hydrogen Atom
in a FourDimensional Riemann Space Through the Path Integral Formalism; J.Chem.Phys. 78
(1983) 839;
The Hydrogen Atom as a Projection of an Homogeneous Space; Zeitschr.Phys. C 20 (1983) 147.
[42] H.Grinberg, J.Mara non and H.Vucetich: Some Remarks on Coulomb and Oscillator Problems in
R
N
; KINAM 5 (1983) 127.
[43] C.Grosche: The Product Form for Path Integrals on Curved Manifolds; Phys.Lett. A 128 (1988)
113.
[44] C.Grosche: Path Integral Solution of a Class of Potentials Related to the P oschlTeller Potential;
J.Phys.A: Math.Gen. 22 (1989) 5073.
[45] C.Grosche: Separation of Variables in Path Integrals and Path Integral Solution of Two Potentials
on the Poincare Upper HalfPlane; J.Phys.A: Math.Gen. 23 (1990) 4885.
[46] C.Grosche: Coulomb Potentials by Path Integration; Fortschr.Phys. 40 (1992), 695.
[47] C.Grosche: Path Integral Solution of a NonIsotropic CoulombLike Potential; Phys.Lett. A 165
(1992), 185.
[48] C.Grosche: Path Integral Solution of Two Potentials Related to the SO(2,1) Dynamical Algebra;
Trieste preprint, SISSA/186/ 91/FM, December 1991.
[49] C.Grosche and F.Steiner: Path Integrals on Curved Manifolds; Zeitschr.Phys. C 36 (1987) 699.
[50] C.Grosche and F.Steiner: Feynman Path Integrals; to appear in Lecture Notes in Physics.
90
Bibliography
[51] C.Grosche and F.Steiner: A Table of Feynman Path Integrals; to appear in Springer Tracts in
Modern Physics.
[52] C.C.Grosjean: A General Formula for the Calculation of Gaussian PathIntegrals in Two and
Three Euclidean Dimensions; J.Comput.Appl.Math. 23 (1988) 199.
[53] C.C.Grosjean and M.J.Goovaerts: The Analytical Evaluation of OneDimensional Gaussian
PathIntegrals; J.Comput.Appl. Math. 21 (1988) 311.
[54] A.C.Hirshfeld: Canonical and Covariant Path Integrals; Phys.Lett. A 67 (1978) 5.
[55] R.Ho and A.Inomata: Exact Path Integral Treatment of the Hydrogen Atom; Phys.Rev.Lett. 48
(1982) 231.
[56] L.Infeld and T.E.Hull: The Factorization Method; Rev.Mod.Phys. 23 (1951), 21.
[57] A.Inomata: Exact PathIntegration for the Two Dimensional Coulomb Problem; Phys.Lett. A
87 (1982) 387.
[58] A.Inomata: Alternative ExactPathIntegralTreatment of the Hydrogen Atom; Phys.Lett. A
101 (1984) 253.
[59] A.Inomata: Remarks on the Time Transformation Technique for Path Integration; in Bielefeld
Encounters in Physics and Mathematics VII; Path Integrals from meV to MeV, 1985, p.433;
Eds.: M.C.Gutzwiller et al. (World Scientic, Singapore, 1986);
Recent Developments of Techniques for Solving Nontrivial Path Integrals; in Path Summation:
Achievements and Goals, Trieste, 1987, p.114; Eds.:S.Lundquist et al. (World Scientic,
Singapore, 1986);
Time Transformation Techniques in Path Integration; in Path Integrals from meV to MeV,
p.112; Eds.: V.Sayakanit et al. (World Scientic, Singapore, 1986);
[60] A.Inomata and R.Wilson: Path Integral Realization of a Dynamical Group; Lecture Notes in
Physics 261, p.42 (SpringerVerlag, Berlin, 1985); FactorizationAlgebraizationPath Integration
and Dynamical Groups; in Symmetries in Science II, eds.: B.Gruber and R.Lenczewski, p.255
(Plenum Press, New York, 1986).
[61] G.Junker and M.B ohm: The SU(1, 1) Propagator as a Path Integral Over Noncompact Groups;
Phys.Lett. A 117 (1986) 375.
[62] H.Kleinert: How to do the Time Sliced Path Integral for the H Atom; Phys.Lett. A 120 (1987)
361.
[63] H.Kleinert: Quantum Mechanics and Path Integral in Spaces with Curvature and Torsion;
Mod.Phys.Lett. A 4 (1990) 2329.
[64] H.Kleinert: Path Integrals in Quantum Mechanics, Statistics and Polymer Physics (World
Scientic, Singapore, 1990).
[65] H.Kleinert and I.Mustapic: Summing the Spectral Representations of P oschlTeller and Rosen
Morse FixedEnergy Amplitudes; J.Math.Phys. 33 (1992) 643.
[66] P.Kustaanheimo and E.Stiefel: Perturbation Theory of Kepler Motion Based on Spinor Regular
ization; J.Rein.Angew.Math. 218 (1965), 204.
[67] W.Langguth and A.Inomata: Remarks on the Hamiltonian Path Integral in Polar Coordinates;
J.Math.Phys. 20 (1979) 499.
[68] F.Langouche, D.Roekaerts and E.Tirapegui: Functional Integration and Semiclassical Expansion
(Reidel, Dordrecht, 1982).
[69] T.D.Lee: Particle Physics and Introduction to Field Theory (Harwood Academic Publishers,
Chur, 1981).
[70] D.W.McLaughlin and L.S.Schulman: Path Integrals in Curved Spaces; J.Math.Phys. 12 (1971)
2520.
[71] A.A.Makarov, J.A.Smorodinsky, Kh.Valiev and P.Winternitz: A Systematic Search for Nonrela
tivistic Systems With Dynamical Symmetries; Nuovo Cimento A 52 (1967), 1061.
[73] M.S.Marinov: Path Integrals in Quantum Theory: An Outlook of Basic Concepts; Phys.Rep. 60
(1980) 1.
[72] M.M.Mizrahi: The Weyl Correspondence and Path Integrals; J.Math.Phys. 16 (1975) 2201.
[74] M.M.Mizrahi: On the Semiclassical Expansion in Quantum Mechanics for Arbitrary Hamiltoni
ans; J.Math.Phys. 18 (1977) 786.
91
Bibliography
[75] M.M.Mizrahi: Phase Space Path Integrals, Without Limiting Procedure; J.Math.Phys. 19 (1978)
298.
[76] C.Morette: On the Denition and Approximation of Feynmans Path Integrals; Phys.Rev. 81
(1951) 848.
[77] C.MoretteDeWitt: Feynmans Path Integral: Denition Without Limiting Procedure; Com
mun.Math.Phys. 28 (1972) 47.
[78] C.MoretteDeWitt: The Semiclassical Expansion; Ann.Phys.(N.Y.) 97 (1976) 367.
[79] C.MoretteDeWitt and K.D.Elworthy: New Stochastic Methods in Physics; Phys.Rep. 77 (1981)
122.
[80] E.Nelson: Feynman Integrals and the Schr odinger Equation; J.Math.Phys. 5 (1964) 332.
[81] M.Omote: Point Canonical Transformations and the Path Integral; Nucl.Phys. B 120 (1977)
325.
[82] N.K.Pak and I.S okmen: General NewTime Formalism in the Path Integral; Phys.Rev. A 30
(1984) 1629.
[83] W.Pauli: Die allgemeinen Prinzipien der Wellenmechanik, in S.Fl ugge: Handbuch der Physik,
Band V/1 (SpringerVerlag, Berlin, 1958).
[84] D.Peak and A.Inomata: Summation Over Feynman Histories in Polar Coordinates; J.Math.Phys.
10 (1969) 1422.
[85] M.Reed and B.Simon: Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics, Vol.II (Academic Press, New
York, 1975).
[86] L.S.Schulman: Techniques and Applications of Path Integration (John Wiley & Sons, New York,
1981).
[87] B.Simon: Functional Integration and Quantum Physics (Academic Press, New York, 1979).
[88] I.S okmen: Exact PathIntegral Solution of the RingShaped Potential; Phys.Lett. A 115 (1986)
249.
[89] I.S okmen: Exact PathIntegral Solution for a Charged Particle in a Coulomb Plus Aharonov
Bohm Potential; Phys.Lett. A 132 (1988) 65.
[90] F.Steiner: SpaceTime Transformations in Radial Path Integrals; Phys.Lett. A 106 (1984) 356.
[91] F.Steiner: Exact Path Integral Treatment of the Hydrogen Atom; Phys.Lett. A 106 (1984) 363.
[92] F.Steiner: Path Integrals in Polar Coordinates From eV to GeV; in Bielefeld Encounters
in Physics and Mathematics VII; Path Integrals From meV to MeV, 1985, p.335; Eds.:
M.C.Gutzwiller et al.(World Scientic, Singapore, 1986).
[93] H.F.Trotter: On the Product of SemiGroups of Operators; Proc.Amer.Math.Soc. 10 (1959) 545.
92