Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 35

UMTS Link Budget Methodology

Sylvestre Demonget
Wireless BG / W-CDMA BD /
Post-Sales Support & Technology Introduction / W-CDMA Network Engineering
April 2
nd
, 2007
2 | HSUPA Link Budget | February 28
th
, 2007 All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2006
Agenda
1. Uplink Link Budget Methodology
2. Downlink Link Budget Methodology
3. Capacity and Throughput Calculation Basics
3 | HSUPA Link Budget | February 28
th
, 2007 All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2006
Introduction
UMTS Link Budget methodology:
Uplink: Cell Range derivation based on a specific UL dimensioning service
Downlink:
Calculation for each DL service of transmit power necessary to reach cell edge
Comparison with maximum allowed power for this DL service
Aspects covered in this presentation:
Link budget methodology (UL and DL) applicable to both Release 99 and HSPA
Cell Range comparisons for multiple:
R99 UL services
HSUPA user throughput targets
UL and DL Capacity calculation using analytic formulas
HSPA Throughput computation using static simulation:
Throughput map
Throughput Vs. Distance from Site
4 | HSUPA Link Budget | February 28
th
, 2007 All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2006
Agenda
1. Uplink Link Budget Methodology
2. Downlink Link Budget Methodology
3. Capacity and Throughput Calculation Basics
5 | HSUPA Link Budget | February 28
th
, 2007 All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2006
1
UMTS Uplink Link Budget
Methodology, Cell Range Comparisons
6 | HSUPA Link Budget | February 28
th
, 2007 All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2006
Uplink Link Budget Methodology (1/8)
MAPL Calculation (1/3: R99)
MAPL MAPL Calculation (Release 99) Calculation (Release 99)
Aim: used to derive Cell Range
Depends on:
UL dimensioning service i (usually CS64)
Propagation environment
UE and Node-B performances
Shadowing Margin, Fast Fading Margin, UL Interference Margin
Margin ce Interferen UL Margin Fading Fast Margin Shadowing
Loss Cables Gain Ant BTS Loss n Penetratio Loss Body
i y Sensitivit NodeB Power Tx Max UE i MAPL

+
=
.
) ( . ) (
U
E

M
a
x
.
T
x
P
o
w
e
r
Body
Loss
BTS
Antenna
Gain
Penetration
Loss
N
o
d
e
-
B

S
e
n
s
i
t
i
v
i
t
y
(

d
e
p
e
n
d
s

o
n

U
L

s
e
r
v
i
c
e

i

)
Max. Allowable air
interface Path Loss
(MAPL)
Max. Allowable air
interface Path Loss
(MAPL)
Shadowing
Margin
Uplink Interference
Margin
Cables
Loss
Fast Fading
Margin
7 | HSUPA Link Budget | February 28
th
, 2007 All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2006
Uplink Link Budget Methodology (2/8)
MAPL Calculation (2/3: Impact of HSDPA)
MAPL MAPL Calculation (Impact of HSDPA) Calculation (Impact of HSDPA)
Mandatory channels for data transfer on HSDPA:
Presence of HS-DPCCH impacts MAPL:
UE transferring on HSDPA must feed back CQI
and ACK/NACK to Node-B on HS-DPCCH
UE available Tx power for
dimensioning UL service i diminishes
MAPL diminishes
|
|

\
|
+ +
+
=

2 2 2
2 2
0
log 10
hs d c
d c
Target
b
N
E
UL


Handled in the UL link
budget as an increase in
UL Eb/N0 Target (Vs. w/o
HS-DPCCH case):
8 | HSUPA Link Budget | February 28
th
, 2007 All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2006
Uplink Link Budget Methodology (2/8)
MAPL Calculation (3/3: HSUPA)
MAPL MAPL Calculation (HSUPA) Calculation (HSUPA)
Cell Range definition:
R99: Cell Range derived assuming a specific UL R99 dimensioning service i
HSUPA: Cell Range may be derived assuming either:
a specific UL R99 dimensioning service i
a specific E-DCH user throughput at cell edge r
HSUPA E
c
/N
0
according to E-DCH user throughput at cell edge r:
) ( ) (
0
i
N
E
Noise Thermal NodeB i y Sensitivit NodeB
Target
c
+ =
1. For several E-TFCs, E-DPDCHs E
c
/N
0
is
given by L1 curves:
E-DPDCHs E
c
/N
0
E
-
D
C
H

U
s
e
r

T
h
r
o
u
g
h
p
u
t
2. For each E-TFC, HSUPA E
c
/N
0
is derived
from E-DPDCHs E
c
/N
0
:
3. Criterion for choice of E-TFC:
E-TFC giving best E
c
/N
0
E-TFC giving best BLER 1Tx
0
2
2 2 2 2 2
0
N
E
DPDCHs E
n
n
N
E
HSUPA
c
ed ed
hs c d ec ed ed
Target
c

+ + + +
=


r
or
9 | HSUPA Link Budget | February 28
th
, 2007 All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2006
Uplink Link Budget Methodology (3/8)
Shadowing Margin
Shadowing Margin Shadowing Margin
Aim: Compensation of Shadowing, i.e. variation in signal strength due to obstacles
modeled by a Log-Normal law, for mobiles close to cell edge.
Value computed so that UL service i can be statistically offered within AR% of cell
area (AR: Area Reliability).
Calculation Method:
1. Assumption on Log-Normal law Stand. Dev. :
2. Jakes Formula for Soft Handover with 2 servers (R99)
Inputs:
Shad
, AR, Attenuation Exponent, Correlation coeff. between Shadowing of the 2 legs
HSUPA-specific: Jakes Formula for 2 servers without SHO
(SHO not supported in Alcatel-Lucent UA5.0 Release)
2 2
n Penetratio Indoor Outdoor Shad Shad
+ =
U
E

M
a
x
.
T
x
P
o
w
e
r
Body
Loss
BTS
Antenna
Gain
Penetration
Loss
N
o
d
e
-
B

S
e
n
s
i
t
i
v
i
t
y
(

d
e
p
e
n
d
s

o
n

U
L

s
e
r
v
i
c
e

i

)
Max. Allowable air
interface Path Loss
(MAPL)
Shadowing
Margin
Shadowing
Margin
Uplink Interference
Margin
Cables
Loss
Fast Fading
Margin
10 | HSUPA Link Budget | February 28
th
, 2007 All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2006
Uplink Link Budget Methodology (4/8)
Fast Fading Margin
Fast Fading Margin Fast Fading Margin
Aim: Compensation of Fast Fading, i.e. variation in signal strength due to
multi-path Rayleigh channel profile, for a mobile close to cell edge.
Value computed so that a mobile at cell edge can do efficient Power Control,
i.e. combat the Fast Fading.
Calculation Method:
Currently, same calculation method for R99 and HSUPA
U
E

M
a
x
.
T
x
P
o
w
e
r
Body
Loss
BTS
Antenna
Gain
Penetration
Loss
N
o
d
e
-
B

S
e
n
s
i
t
i
v
i
t
y
(

d
e
p
e
n
d
s

o
n

U
L

s
e
r
v
i
c
e

i

)
Max. Allowable air
interface Path Loss
(MAPL)
Shadowing
Margin
Uplink Interference
Margin
Cables
Loss
Fast Fading
Margin
Fast Fading
Margin
( ) ( ) On TPC
N
E
UL Off TPC
N
E
UL Margin Fading Fast
Target
b
Target
b
= = =
0 0
11 | HSUPA Link Budget | February 28
th
, 2007 All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2006
Uplink Link Budget Methodology (5/8)
Uplink Interference Margin (1/2)
Uplink Interference Margin Uplink Interference Margin
Aim: Compensation of interference generated by other mobiles on the uplink.
Value computed for each UL service i so that i transmitted by a mobile can be
received at Node-B with sufficient SINR even at maximum UL Cell Load.
Calculation Method: ) ( ) ( . i Rise Noise UL User Rise Noise UL Total i Margin Interf UL =
|
|

\
|

Load Cell UL Noise Thermal BTS


ce Interferen UL Total
1
1
Noise Thermal BTS
Power Rx User
( ) [ ] ) .( . ) ( 1 log 10 ) ( . i P Rx User Interf UL Total i Power Rx User NR UL Total i Margin Interf UL
dB dB
+ =
|

\
|
+ = ) ( 1 log 10 ) (
0
i
N
E
Rise Noise UL Total i Margin ce Interferen UL
Target
c
dB dB
U
E

M
a
x
.
T
x
P
o
w
e
r
Body
Loss
BTS
Antenna
Gain
Penetration
Loss
N
o
d
e
-
B

S
e
n
s
i
t
i
v
i
t
y
(

d
e
p
e
n
d
s

o
n

U
L

s
e
r
v
i
c
e

i

)
Max. Allowable air
interface Path Loss
(MAPL)
Shadowing
Margin
Uplink Interference
Margin
Uplink Interference
Margin
Cables
Loss
Fast Fading
Margin
12 | HSUPA Link Budget | February 28
th
, 2007 All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2006
Uplink Link Budget Methodology (6/8)
Uplink Interference Margin (2/2)
Reminder:
Total UL Noise Rise value setting in the link budget:
Set to the maximum allowed value: Max. UL Noise Rise
Set according to an iterative process:
Functional point between {Cell Range = UL Link Budget( Total UL NR )} and
{Total UL NR = Traffic Model Traffic Model( Cell Range )}
Total UL Noise Rise<Max. UL Noise Rise must be true
Max. UL Noise Rise is set by below UTRAN parameters:
Limit applied on R99 traffic only: rtwpMaxCellLoadNonEdch
(Default in UA5.0: 50%)
Limit applied on total UL traffic (R99+HSUPA): totalRotMax
(Default in UA5.0: 6dB)
Number of subscribers per km
2
Call Profile
Grade of Service (GoS) for each UL service
|

\
|
+ = ) ( 1 log 10 ) (
0
i
N
E
Rise Noise UL Total i Margin ce Interferen UL
Target
c
dB dB
or
13 | HSUPA Link Budget | February 28
th
, 2007 All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2006
Uplink Link Budget Methodology (7/8)
Cell Range Calculation
Cell Range Cell Range Calculation basing on Calculation basing on MAPL MAPL
Relationship Cell Range MAPL:
2100 MHz: COST-Hata propagation model
900 MHz: Okumura-Hata propagation model
Site Coverage for 3-sector case (surface covered by 1 Node-B):
] dB [ . ]) m [ log( ]) m [ . log( 55 . 6 9 . 44 (
] [ . . ]) m [ . log( 82 . 13 ]) MHz [ log( 9 . 33 3 . 46 ] dB [
Factor Corr t Environmen k d Height Ant BTS
dB Factor Corr Height Ant UE Height Ant BTS f Loss Path
+ +
+ =
] dB [ . ]) m [ log( ]) m [ . log( 55 . 6 9 . 44 (
] [ . . ]) m [ . log( 82 . 13 ]) MHz [ log( 16 . 26 55 . 69 ] dB [
Factor Corr t Environmen k d Height Ant BTS
dB Factor Corr Height Ant UE Height Ant BTS f Loss Path
+ +
+ =
U
E

M
a
x
.
T
x
P
o
w
e
r
Body
Loss
BTS
Antenna
Gain
Penetration
Loss
N
o
d
e
-
B

S
e
n
s
i
t
i
v
i
t
y
(

d
e
p
e
n
d
s

o
n

U
L

s
e
r
v
i
c
e

i

)
Max. Allowable air
interface Path Loss
(MAPL)
Max. Allowable air
interface Path Loss
(MAPL)
Shadowing
Margin
Uplink Interference
Margin
Cables
Loss
Fast Fading
Margin
2 2
3
] km [
8
3 9
] km [ Range Cell Coverage Site
Sectors
=
14 | HSUPA Link Budget | February 28
th
, 2007 All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2006
Uplink Link Budget Methodology (8/8)
Tower Mounted Amplifier (TMA) Benefits and Drawbacks
TMA Aim: Reduce the impact of Cables Loss in the UL increase Cell Range
TMA handling in Alcatel-Lucent link budget:
UL:
Cables Loss = 0.4dB (jumper before TMA),
Friis Formula for the Noise Figure of {TMA, cables after TMA, BTS}
DL: +0.8dB on Cables Loss compared to without TMA case
(1 additional jumper + TMA insertion loss)
BTS
Antenna
Gain
Cables Loss
Without TMA
N
o
d
e
-
B

S
e
n
s
i
t
i
v
i
t
y
BTS
Antenna
Gain
Cables Loss
with TMA
With TMA
N
o
d
e
-
B

S
e
n
s
i
t
i
v
i
t
y
TMA impact
on the UL:
Simplified
vision
15 | HSUPA Link Budget | February 28
th
, 2007 All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2006
Cell Range Comparisons (1/2)
Dense Urban Environment
Main Assumptions:
Channel Profile = Pedestrian A 3km/h
HS-DPCCH impact included in UL R99 services E
b
/N
0
E-TFC chosen according to best E
c
/N
0
criterion
Penetration Loss = 18dB, Hata Env. Corr. Factor = 0dB, TMA = On
UE Max. Tx Power = 21dBm for all services (conservative)
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Max. UL Noise Rise [dB]
C
e
l
l

R
a
n
g
e

[
k
m
]
DCH 128
E-DCH 128
DCH 384
E-DCH 384
E-DCH 1024
16 | HSUPA Link Budget | February 28
th
, 2007 All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2006
Cell Range Comparisons (2/2)
Suburban Environment
Main Assumptions:
Channel Profile = Pedestrian A 50km/h
HS-DPCCH impact included in UL R99 services E
b
/N
0
E-TFC chosen according to best E
c
/N
0
criterion
Penetration Loss=10dB, Hata Env. Corr. Factor = -12dB, TMA = On
UE Max. Tx Power = 21dBm for all services (conservative)
0.7
0.9
1.1
1.3
1.5
1.7
1.9
2.1
2.3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Max. UL Noise Rise [dB]
C
e
l
l

R
a
n
g
e

[
k
m
]
DCH 128
E-DCH 128
DCH 384
E-DCH 384
E-DCH 1024
17 | HSUPA Link Budget | February 28
th
, 2007 All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2006
Agenda
1. Uplink Link Budget Methodology
2. Downlink Link Budget Methodology
3. Capacity and Throughput Calculation Basics
18 | HSUPA Link Budget | February 28
th
, 2007 All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2006
2
UMTS Downlink Link Budget
Methodology, Impact of HSUPA DL channels
19 | HSUPA Link Budget | February 28
th
, 2007 All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2006
Downlink Link Budget Methodology (1/3)
Downlink Maximum Air Path Loss Calculation
Downlink Maximum Air Path Loss Downlink Maximum Air Path Loss
DL air interface path loss at the cell edge,
i.e. for Cell Range derived from UL link budget
Aim: used to derive Downlink Maximum Total Path Loss
Calculation Method: COST-Hata
-1
( Cell Range, DL f )
MAPL + Frequency Shift( DL f UL f )
Depends on:
R99: UL R99 dimensioning service i
HSUPA: i or specific E-DCH user throughput at cell edge r
BTS Ant. Gain
DL Max. Total
Path Loss
Cables Loss
DL Max. Air
Path Loss
DL Max. Air
Path Loss
Penetration
Loss
Shadowing
Margin
Fast Fading
Margin R
e
q
u
i
r
e
d

D
L

U
s
e
r

T
x
P
o
w
e
r
(

d
e
p
e
n
d
s

o
n

D
L

s
e
r
v
i
c
e

j

)
Body Loss
U
E

S
e
n
s
i
t
i
v
i
t
y
(

d
e
p
e
n
d
s

o
n

D
L

s
e
r
v
i
c
e

j

)
20 | HSUPA Link Budget | February 28
th
, 2007 All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2006
Downlink Link Budget Methodology (2/3)
Downlink Maximum Total Path Loss Calculation
Downlink Maximum Total Path Loss Downlink Maximum Total Path Loss
DL total path loss at the cell edge, from BTS PA to UE
Aim: used to derive Required DL User Tx Power, HSDPA throughput
Calculation Method:
Remark: DL Max. Total PL does not take into account any DL interference margin.
Indeed, DL interferences are directly taken into account in
the following formula giving Required DL User Tx Power.
BTS Ant. Gain
DL Max. Total
Path Loss
DL Max. Total
Path Loss
Cables Loss
DL Max. Air
Path Loss
Penetration
Loss
Shadowing
Margin
Fast Fading
Margin R
e
q
u
i
r
e
d

D
L

U
s
e
r

T
x
P
o
w
e
r
(

d
e
p
e
n
d
s

o
n

D
L

s
e
r
v
i
c
e

j

)
Body Loss
U
E

S
e
n
s
i
t
i
v
i
t
y
(

d
e
p
e
n
d
s

o
n

D
L

s
e
r
v
i
c
e

j

)
Margin Fading Fast Margin Shadowing
Loss Body Loss Pene Gain Ant BTS Loss Cable
PL Air Max DL PL Total Max DL
+ +
+ + +
=
. .
. .
21 | HSUPA Link Budget | February 28
th
, 2007 All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2006
Downlink Link Budget Methodology (3/3)
Required Downlink User Tx Power
Required Downlink User Required Downlink User Tx Tx Power Power
Required transmit power at BTS PA so that DL R99 service j can be received with
sufficient SINR by a mobile at cell edge.
Allows to know if DL coverage can be assured at cell edge for service j,
by comparing with maxDlTxPower(j), i.e. max. power allowable for j per user.
Calculation Method:
BTS Ant. Gain
DL Max. Total
Path Loss
Cables Loss
DL Max. Air
Path Loss
Penetration
Loss
Shadowing
Margin
Fast Fading
Margin
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
d

D
L

U
s
e
r

T
x
P
o
w
e
r
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
d

D
L

U
s
e
r

T
x
P
o
w
e
r
(

d
e
p
e
n
d
s

o
n

D
L

s
e
r
v
i
c
e

j

)
Body Loss
U
E

S
e
n
s
i
t
i
v
i
t
y
(

d
e
p
e
n
d
s

o
n

D
L

s
e
r
v
i
c
e

j

)
1
0
) (
. . ) (
) ( .

\
|
+
+ +
=
j
N
E
DL OF
PL Total Max DL Noise Th UE PA OF
Ii
Ie
DL
j Power Tx User DL Req
Target
c
edge cell
Ii : Intra-cell interference
(before despreading, includes own signal)
OVSF Codes
Orthogonality Factor
(depends on channel
profile)
Ie : Extra-cell interference
22 | HSUPA Link Budget | February 28
th
, 2007 All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2006
Power Available for HSDPA (1/2)
Computation Method in UA5.0 Release, for Shared Carrier scenario
Power Available for HSDPA Power Available for HSDPA (HS-DSCH+HS-SCCH, all HSDPA users in cell)
Computation Method in UA5.0 Release:
Tx Power for each common control channel: set relatively to CPICH Tx Power
CPICH Tx Power : set according to CPICH E
c
/I
0
Target , Cell Range,
Area Reliability, environment parameters
P. HSUPA : room power reserved for HSUPA DL channels. Constant, tunable.
P. Non HSDPA : transmit power for non-HSDPA traffic, i.e. R99 traffic,
common control channels and HSUPA downlink channels.
Updated within Node-B every 100ms.
DCH Margin: room power for DCH used to prevent fast increase of DCH power
due to Power Control. Proportional to (P. Non HSDPA CPICH Tx Power)
{ } Margin DCH HSDPA Non P PA HSUPA P CCC P Margin SHO PA
HSDPA for Available Power DL
= . , . . Min
RNC view Node-B view
23 | HSUPA Link Budget | February 28
th
, 2007 All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2006
Power Available for HSDPA (2/2)
Impact of HSUPA Downlink Channels
Power for HSUPA Downlink Channels Link Budget model:
DL HSUPA Tx Power is assumed constant:

E-AGCH
: coefficient (0~1) chosen according to supposed amount of HSUPA traffic.
Assumption: only 1 absolute grant sent at one time.
Default value in Link Budget: 1
E-AGCH Tx Power : Tx power for 1 E-AGCH channel.
UTRAN default value: CPICH Tx Power - 2.5dB
n
E-HICH
: Average number of signatures used on E-HICH
Default value in Link Budget: 2
E-HICH Tx Power : Tx power per signature of E-HICH.
E-HICH channel Tx power is proportional to #signatures used.
UTRAN default value: CPICH Tx Power 18.6dB
Power Tx HICH E n Power Tx AGCH E Power Tx HSUPA DL
HICH E AGCH E
+ =
E-RGCH not
supported in
UA5.0
24 | HSUPA Link Budget | February 28
th
, 2007 All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2006
Agenda
1. Uplink Link Budget Methodology
2. Downlink Link Budget Methodology
3. Capacity and Throughput Calculation Basics
25 | HSUPA Link Budget | February 28
th
, 2007 All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2006
3
Capacity and Throughput Calculation Basics
Method presented: calculation via formulas/static simulation
26 | HSUPA Link Budget | February 28
th
, 2007 All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2006
Pole Capacity:
Maximum theoretical number of active users on the UL supported per cell,
when no limit on UE Max. Tx Power and Max. UL Noise Rise

UL Cell Capacity:
Max. # active users on the UL supported per cell
(all using same UL service i)
Uplink Capacity Calculation (1/2)
Mono Service
UL
i e
i
I I
I
FR
+
=
|

\
|

+ =
SHO
Target
c
Pole
G i
N
E
UL i AF
FR
i N
) ( ) (
1 ) (
0
Load Cell UL i N i Capacity Cell UL
Pole
= ) ( ) (
Frequency Reuse Efficiency
Soft Handover Gain on capacity
(not considered for HSUPA)
channel Activity Factor
(only for Speech service)
Assumed equal to the
maximum allowed value, i.e.
1-1 / Max UL Noise Rise
or
Set according to an iterative
process, thanks to
Traffic Model Traffic Model
May also be E
c
/N
0
Target for E-DCH
with a specific
throughput r
27 | HSUPA Link Budget | February 28
th
, 2007 All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2006
UL Cell Capacity in Traffic Mix:
Maximum number of users (including non-active users) on the UL
supported per cell, assuming a specific Call Profile
Uplink Capacity Calculation (2/2)
Traffic Mix

=
=
services UL
i
Pole
UL
i N
i
Load Cell UL
Mix Traffic in Capacity Cell UL
#
1
) (
) (
Average user throughput in
Busy Hour for UL service i
as given in the Call Profile

=
=
services UL
k
UL
i R
k throughput CP
i R
i throughput CP
i
#
1
) (
) (
) (
) (
) (
Rate for service i
(e.g. 64kbps for CS64)
Formula may
account for
some UL
services
defined as
E-DCH with a
specific
throughput r
28 | HSUPA Link Budget | February 28
th
, 2007 All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2006
Asymptotic Capacity:
Maximum theoretical number of active users on the DL supported per cell,
when no limit on BTS Power Amplifier (all using same DL service j)
DL Cell Capacity in Traffic Mix:
(HSDPA traffic not present, analytic calculation)
Max. #active users on the DL supported per cell
Dowlink Capacity Calculation
OF
Ii
Ie
DL
G i
N
E
DL OF
i AF
j N
mean
SHO
Target
c
Asymp
+
|

\
|
+
+ =
1
0
) (
) (
1
) (
OF
Ii
Ie
DL
PL Total Mean DL Noise Th UE
PA
Power Tx CCC PA
mean
+

=
=
services DL
j
Asymp
DL
j N
j
Load Cell DL
Mix Traffic in Capacity Cell DL
#
1
) (
) (
29 | HSUPA Link Budget | February 28
th
, 2007 All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2006
Power Available
for HS-DSCH
HS-DSCH
Rx E
c
/N
0
Distance
Serving Node-B UE
HSDPA UE
Category
HSDPA User
Throughput
CQI
reported
HSDPA Throughput Computation via Static Simulation (1/2)
UE Speed Channel
Profile
DL Total
Path Loss
Shadowing at UE
BTS Ant. Diagram
HSDPA User Throughput HSDPA User Throughput Map Computation via Static Simulation Map Computation via Static Simulation
1. Generate DL Total Path Loss map for each cell.
For each location {x,y} , find the serving cell.
2. Calculate Power Available for HS-DSCH
For each location {x,y} :
3. Calculate HS-DSCH Rx E
c
/N
0
4. Calculate CQI reported by the mobile
5. Calculate HSDPA User Throughput
[ ] ) , , ( Min ) , , (
, ) , (
c y x PL c y x PL
c y x Cell Serving
=
=
a)
b) Estimate and subtract HS-SCCH Tx Power
)
`



=
Margin DCH HSDPA Non P PA
HSUPA P CCC P Margin SHO PA
HSDPA for Available Power DL
.
, . .
Min
30 | HSUPA Link Budget | February 28
th
, 2007 All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2006
Power Available
for HS-DSCH
HS-DSCH
Rx E
c
/N
0
Distance
Serving Node-B UE
HSDPA UE
Category
HSDPA User
Throughput
HSDPA User
Throughput
CQI
reported
CQI
reported
HSDPA Throughput Computation via Static Simulation (2/2)
UE Speed Channel
Profile
DL Total
Path Loss
Shadowing at UE
BTS Ant. Diagram
HSDPA User Throughput HSDPA User Throughput Map Computation via Static Simulation Map Computation via Static Simulation
4. Calculate CQI reported by the mobile:
5. Calculate HSDPA User Throughput:
[dB]
0
N
E
Rx DSCH HS reported CQI
c
speed
+ =
13.3 120 km/h
14.3 50 km/h
15.5 3 km/h

speed
UE Speed
3
2
# HS-PDSCH(s)
QPSK
QPSK
Modulation
432 kbps 3 1262 b 10
288 kbps 2 931 b 9
RLC Throughput # MAC-hs PDU(s)
per TB
Transport
Block Size
CQI
C
Q
I

T
a
b
l
e

f
o
r
U
E

C
a
t
e
g
o
r
y

6

Derived from TBS, MAC-d PDU size (=336b),


MAC-hs header size (21b)
Derived assuming
BLER 1Tx=10%
31 | HSUPA Link Budget | February 28
th
, 2007 All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2006
UL Noise Rise
Available for
user
E-DCH
Rx E
c
/N
0
Distance
Serving Node-B UE
HSDPA UE
Category
E-DCH User
Throughput
E-TFC
HSUPA Throughput Computation via Static Simulation
UE Speed
Max. UL
Noise Rise
(totalRotMax)
UL Total
Path Loss
Shadowing at UE
BTS Ant. Diagram
HSUPA User Throughput HSUPA User Throughput Map Computation via Static Simulation Map Computation via Static Simulation
1. Generate UL Total Path Loss map for each cell.
For each location {x,y} , find the serving cell.
2. Calculate UL Noise Rise Available for User
For each location {x,y} :
3. Calculate E-DCH Rx E
c
/N
0
4. Derive E-TFC
5. Calculate E-DCH User Throughput
Channel
Profile
users other Rise Noise UL
x totalRotMa

E-DPDCHs E
c
/N
0
E
-
D
C
H

U
s
e
r

T
h
r
o
u
g
h
p
u
t
32 | HSUPA Link Budget | February 28
th
, 2007 All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2006
HSUPA Throughput Computation via Static Simulation (1/2)
User Throughput Map
Main Assumptions:
HSUPA dedicated carrier (no R99 UL traffic)
Channel Profile = Pedestrian A 3km/h
Penetration Loss = 18dB, Hata Env. Corr. Factor
= 0dB, TMA = On
Shadowing standard deviation = 8dB
UE: Max. Tx Power = 21dBm, HSUPA Category 3
Cell
Range:
+20%
Cell Range
dimensioned
on E-DCH 128
33 | HSUPA Link Budget | February 28
th
, 2007 All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2006
HSUPA Throughput Computation via Static Simulation (2/2)
User Throughput Vs. Distance from Site
Main Assumptions:
Shared carrier R99/HSUPA
Channel Profile = Pedestrian A 3km/h
Penetration Loss = 18dB, Hata Env. Corr. Factor
= 0dB, TMA = On
Shadowing standard deviation = 8dB
UE: Max. Tx Power = 21dBm, HSUPA Category 3
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
Distance from Serving NodeB [m]

E
-
D
C
H

M
A
C
-
e
U
s
e
r

T
h
r
o
u
g
h
p
u
t
[
k
b
p
s
]

R99 UL Cell Load = 50% * Max. UL Cell Load


No R99 UL traffic
Cell Range = 450m
Cell Range = 540m
Cell Range: +20%
34 | HSUPA Link Budget | February 28
th
, 2007 All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2006
Presentation Summary
UMTS Link Budget methodology:
Uplink: Cell Range derivation based on specific UL dimensioning service
Downlink:
Calculation for each DL service of required power necessary to reach cell edge
Comparison with maximum allowed power for this DL service
UMTS Link Budget tool usage:
Main objective: derive Cell Range assuming a dimensioning UL service
Other features: UL and DL Capacity calculation via formulas
Gives an idea of capacity without running any simulation
Gives inputs for Radio Dimensioning and Cell Planning
Used to study impact of features on RF aspects
35 | HSUPA Link Budget | February 28
th
, 2007 All Rights Reserved Alcatel-Lucent 2006
www.alcatel-lucent.com

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi