Mental competency to

stand trial
By Stanley Green: Please copy and paste below in your browser to sign my petition.
https://www.change.org/petitions/eric-h-holder-us-attorney-general-writ-of-mandamus-to-end-licensed-bullies-administrating-due-process

Licensed Bullying
When I was indicted October 6, 1992 on the charges of rape and incest, I became a victim of licensed bullying. Each licensed officer (i.e. judge, lawyer or forensic doctor) who had a lawful duty to uphold my due process has bullied me around communicating my medical records without my consent. Due process is a legal term that means both the Judiciary and Executive Branches must faithfully uphold without prejudice each of my United States Constitution Bill of Rights and/or Civil Rights. TCA 39-17-309 Intimidation of Civil Rights is a felony offense. Yet, licensed officers in Shelby County Justice Center (SCJC) have adult bullied me from exercising my legal rights as a criminal defendant. I have letters and receipts to corroborate my accusations of licensed bullying is true and accurate. My ambition is to testify before a Senate Judiciary Committee.

Mentally competent to stand trial

My case has never gone to trial because my Public Defenders have bullied me to pursue a mentally incompetent line of defense. Later I will present you the legal definition of what it means to be declared mentally incompetent. Also, I will apprise you to understand that Memphis Mental Health Institute (MMHI) is the official psychiatric court in Shelby County, TN thats been designated exclusive powers to adjudicate mentally incompetent cases. Middle Tennessee Mental Health Institute (MTMHI) is our state insane asylum (formerly Central State Hospital). I have never needed a guardian to manage my affairs. Here I was imprisoned 200 miles away from my hometown in Nashville, TN on Murfreesboro Rd. in a mental insane asylum to undergo two 30-day psychiatric evaluations one year apart.

Judge Dailey forfeited my bail bond

Shelby County Criminal Court Judge Joseph Dailey Div. V forfeited my bail bond with Brisco Bonding Company after Larry Southard, Director of Forensic Services Middle Tennessee Mental Health Institute (MTMHI) had written him a letter dated May 13, 1993 stating that I was mentally competent to stand trial. Judge Dailey neglected to sign an order to refund my bail deposit of $500. Judge Dailey issued me a second bail bond for $20,000. I refused to pay for a second bail bond because Brisco Bonding Company didnt refund my $500 deposit for my first bail bond that Judge Dailey forfeited with no fault of my own.

Shelby County Justice Center

Mayor A C Wharton was the Chief Public Defender at the time Shelby County Justice Center (SCJC) kept me confined for one full year with Brisco Bonding Company holding my $500 bail deposit. TCA 40-11-120 and 40-11205 specify instructions to the court for judges that forfeit bail deposits of criminal defendants to refund our money back. My public defenders Attorney Sherrye Brown and Mark S. McDaniel allowed Judge Dailey to forfeit my bail in violation of Tennessee law. I became so frustrated with licensed attornies bullying my legal rights and judges robbing me of my money that I inevitabley gave up my defense and pled guilty to incest.

Mayor A C Wharton, Jr.s Letter

Mayor A C Wharton, Jr., (former Chief Public Defender) has written me a letter dated October, 28, 1992. I had asked Chief Wharton to assign me a public defender who would warrant my legal rights to due process. He replied that his office would carry out responsibilities as required by law. Instead, I ended up with Attorney Sherrye Brown advising me that I no choice except to plead guilty.

TCA 39-13-506 Statutory Rape

TCA 39-15-302 Incest

Minerva A. Johnican Criminal Court Clerk Stanley Greens Indictment October 14, 1992

Brisco Bonding Company

Below is a copy of two (2) receipts from Brisco Bonding Company for payments made on my $5000 criminal bond that Judge Dailey Div. V revoked and later forfeited after he ordered me involuntarily committed into Middle Tennessee Mental Health Institute (MTMHI) in Davidson County, TN. Judge Dailey has neglected to issue an order for Brisco Bonding Company to refund our payments. Michael Brisco and I have played football at Northside High School of Memphis. Michael is now deceased. Samuel Brisco (Skip) is his brother. Our families have years of acquaintances and were highly respected in our Klondike neighborhood.

TCA 40-11-120 Forfeiture of defendants bail deposit

10

TCA 40-11-205 Refund of forfeiture payments on reversal

11

Judicial Diversion
Judge Doran Div. IV has denied my legal right to diversion as a first-time felony offender which means that my record can never be expunged for the rest of my life despite having only one conviction.

12

Probation Order June 2, 1994

Shelby County Criminal Court Judge Doran (Div. IV) has issued my probation order and spelled out terms of my supervision through Tennessee Department of Corrections Parole and Probation Office. I was legally entitled to diversion as a first time felony offender, but Judge Doran bullied me out of it.

13

Joyce A. Woodleys Letter

Joyce A. Woodley was my original probation officer upon my felony conviction of incest June 2, 1994. Her primary concern was to supervise my attendance for mental health treatment.

14

Tennessee Department of Correction Division of Adult Probation Plan of Supervision

Shelby County Criminal Court Judge Doran (Div IV) ordered Tennessee Department of Adult Probation and Parole to supervise me to receive mental health which I was actively pursuing through VA Hospital Mental Hygiene Clinic before I was indicted by Shelby County District Attorney Genera

15

Status History Inquiry

My Status History Inquiry is a report of my criminal court business activities beginning October 6, 1992

16

Larry A. Godwin & William Gibbons Letters

Larry A. Godwin, Director of Police Services City of Memphis Police Department tried to bully me around lying to Mayor Dr. W. W. Herenton that I have been convicted of rape. I had to beg William Gibbons, Shelby County District Attorney to write me a letter to stop Larry from bullying me around.

17

Green vs. Godwin

I have filed a Citizens Dispute Complaint in Shelby County Circuit Court hoping to stop Director Godwin and Memphis Police Department from bullying me around. Judge Jerry Moore threw a monkey wrench in my case to stop the wheels of justice from churning and I decided to forfeit my lawsuit.

18

Green vs. Godwin Cont

19

Green vs. Godwin Cont

20

James Johnsons Letter

21

Green vs. Wharton

I filed a Class Action Civil Rights lawsuit in US District Court against Shelby County Mayor AC Wharton, Jr. and Shelby County law enforcement authorities for bullying me of my voting rights.

22

TCA 40-20-112 & 40-29-203 Revocation & Restoration of Voting Rights

Tennessee Department of Probation and Parole has never submitted restoration of my voting rights and no matter how many times I have complained nothing has been done to correct the situation.

23

TCA 39-17-309 Civil Rights Intimidation

24

Rule 501 Privileges Recognized only as Provided Tennessee Law

25

Rule 501 Privileges Recognized only as Provided Tennessee Law Cont

26

Fifth Amendment

27

Fourteenth Amendment

28

Fourteenth Amendment Cont

29

Mistrial

30

Due Process

31

Due Process Cont

32

Discovery Evidence

33

Discovery Evidence Cont

34

Motion in Limine

35

The Law and Self-representation

During my Motion for Limine Hearing I formerly requested Judge H. T. Lockard under oath to recuse Attorney McDaniel for bulling me and permit me to represent myself. Judge Lockard denied my legal right.

36

TCA 33-5-404 Finding of need for involuntary commitment by designated psychologists

37

Charter Lakeside Hospital Patient Account Statement

My medical bill at Charter Lakeside was $14,379 for two weeks inpatient hospitalization and treatments. Barbara was admitted in Lakeside Hospital the following month after I had been discharged

38

UT Medical Group, Inc. Consent Forms

39

UT Medical Group, Inc. Patient Statement

40

Memphis Mental Health Institute

41

Middle Tennessee Mental Health Institute

The Middle Tennessee Mental Health Institute (MTMHI), originally known as the Tennessee Hospital for the Insane and later as the Central State Hospital for the Insane, is a psychiatric hospital located in Nashville, Tennessee. After visiting Tennessee's first mental health facility, the Tennessee Lunatic Asylum, in November 1847, Dorothea Dix urged the state legislature to replace the unfit facility. The new facility, named Central State Hospital for the Insane, opened in 1852 in southeast Nashville, Tennessee on the southwest corner of Murfreesboro Road and Donelson Pike. In 1963, the Tennessee Neuropsychiatric Institute was formed by Vanderbilt University and its research facility was located at Central State. In 1995, the hospital moved to new facilities on Stewarts Ferry Pike. The original hospital buildings were demolished in 1999 to make way for Dell to build a large computer assembly plant (Wikipedia).

42

Mental Incompetency (Wikipedia)

A person who is diagnosed as being mentally ill, senile, or suffering from some other debility that prevents them from managing his own affairs may be declared mentally incompetent by a court of law. When a person is judged to be incompetent, a guardian is appointed to handle the person's property and personal affairs. The legal procedure for declaring a person incompetent consists of three steps: (1) a motion for a competency hearing, (2) a psychiatric or psychological evaluation, and (3) a competency hearing. Probate courts usually handle competency proceedings, which guarantee the allegedly incompetent person Due Process of Law. In Criminal Law a defendant's mental competency may be questioned out of concern for the defendant's welfare or for strategic legal reasons. The defense may request a competency hearing so that it can gather information to use in Plea Bargaining, to mitigate a sentence, or to prepare for a potential Insanity Defense. The prosecution may raise the issue as a preventive measure or to detain the defendant so that a weak case can be built into a stronger one. A motion for a competency hearing must be made before sentencing takes place. In federal court a motion for a hearing will be granted "if there is a reasonable cause to believe that the defendant may be suffering from a mental disease or defect rendering him mentally incompetent" (18 U.S.C.A. 4241 (a)). A psychiatric or psychological evaluation is then conducted, and a hearing is held on the matter. If the court finds that the defendant is incompetent, the defendant will be hospitalized for a reasonable period of time, usually no more than four months. The goal is to determine whether the defendant's competence can be restored. This type of mental commitment is authorized by the U.S. Supreme Court only for defendants who "probably soon will be able to stand trial" (Jackson v. Indiana, 406 U.S. 715, 92 S. Ct. 1845, 32 L. Ed. 2d 435 [1972]). The possibility that a defendant committed a serious crime does not warrant an extended commitment period, because that would violate the defendant's due process rights.

43

Chief Lance Bracys Letters

Judge Joseph Dailey Div. V had appoint Attorney Sherrye Brown to represent me as my Public Defender. Upon my first interview she advised me to plead guilty to incest in exchange for 3-year probation plea bargain agreement. I refused her offer and requested to exercise my legal right to file counterclaim against the state. She denied my request and scheduled me for a mental competency hearing. I filed an ethical complaint with Lance Bracy, Chief Disciplinary Counsel Board of Professional Responsibility. Lance dismissed my complaint.

44

Attorney Mark S. McDaniel

Judge Joseph Dailey Div. V had appointed Attorney Mark S. McDaniel to represent me as Public Defender. Attorney Sherrye Brown had recused herself from defending my case. I had filed my ethical complaint with Lance Bracy Chief Disciplinary Counsel Board of Professional Responsibility (BPR). Judge Dailey had made a comment from the bench telling me not to file a complaint against Attorney McDaniel for this was the final time he would appoint a replacement Public Defender. Instead of filing a complaint against Attorney Mark S. McDaniel I filed my ethical complaint with Sheila Jordan Cunningham, Presiding Judge Court of the Judiciary (COJ) against Judge Joseph Dailey for unethical misconduct. Attorney McDaniel had portrayed me as mentally incompetent to stand trial in lieu of me filing my complaints.

Adult Bullying
I kept a journal of letters from Attorney Mark S. McDaniel where he has resorted to adult bullying. Mark has written me two letters dated April 13 & 14, 1993 to bully me against filing my counterclaim stating he alone shall decide my defense strategy. After I have been convicted June 2, 1994 Mark wrote me a letter dated June 6, 1994 to congratulate me how I conducted myself at my trial. Five months later Mark wrote his final letter dated November 7, 1994 where he stopped bulling me. He sent my discovery evidence and offered me his cooperation. I was legally entitled to my discovery evidence during the preliminary proceedings of my mental competency hearing. Instead, Mark bullied me to where I was intimidated against exercising my constitutional and/or civil rights. Mark should have been disbarred and prosecuted for intimidation of my civil rights for his adult bulling.

45

Bullying Statistics

46

Attorney Mark S. McDaniels Letters

47

Attorney Mark S. McDaniels Letters Cont

48

Attorney Mark S. McDaniels Letters Cont

49

Dr. Andrea L. Nichols & Dr. Lynne D. Zager Letters

50

Dr. Larry Southards Letters

51

Larry Southards Letters Cont

52

Larry Southards Letters Cont

53

Dr. John Hutsons Letters

Dr. John Hutson has characterized me as a writ writer which is a professional term for jailhouse lawyer. My licensed therapist and licensed attorney are discussing my medical history and my complaints against licensed officers of the court which both confidentialities are protected under privileged communication.

54

Sheila Jordan Cunninghams Letter

I have filed complaints with the Court of Judiciary against Judge Joseph Daily, Judge H. T. Lockard and Chancellor Floyd Pete protesting blatant ethical and legal violations of my rights to due process. Judge Sheila Jordan Cunningham has wrongfully dismissed my complaints concerning ethical misconduct.

55

Ton of incriminating letters

I have a ton of incriminating letters that prove I have been bullied during my mental competency hearing. Each licensed officer had a legal obligation to me as a criminal defendant to protect my privileged communication. Instead, each one was unethically writing letters behind my back discussing my medical history swearing up and down that I was mentally incompetent to stand trial. Not a single one has asked me to sign consent to release my medical records. My Public Defenders were the head Honcho leading the pack. Dr. Andrea Nichols had referred Judge Dailey to send me to MMHI for further evaluation, but Judge Dailey ordered Shelby County Sheriff Deputies to involuntarily commit me to MTMHI in Nashville, TN.

Licensed Bullying
Mr. Green you little wimp so what if I have shared your medical records with forensic doctors without your knowledge or consent! How dare you file ethical complaints? Just for that were going to gang up on you to have you shipped to a nuthouse for running your big mouth! The problem with you licensed bullies is you dont know how to accept constructive criticism. I dont need to be in a nuthouse. Instead, you need to stop pushing me around like a little kid! I bet if you were to lose your attorney license, then I would pulverize you down to my size. Dont you worry I wont ever lose my attorney license because nobody believes you. Your doctors are working for me and I tell them what to say about your mental state.

56

Dr. John Hutson

Dr. John Hutson you were my therapist at Charter Lakeside. I feel terrible that I have entrusted my faith in you as my therapist and youre going around slandering me to my Judge Lockard as being mentally incompetent to stand trial. This has caused me to lose self-confidence in myself. Is it something that I have said in my therapy sessions that has given you the impression that my mind is so warped I need a guardian to help me manage my affairs? I thought I was pretty nice guy. I have become mixed up. Well Stanley its like this: I figured that as your therapist I had an ethical duty to lie about your mental competency to save your neck from going to trial!

Counter-transference
Dr. Hutson thats very clever of you to make up a lie to save my neck from going to trial. I see you and my public defenders have the exact same ethical standards. Here I am thinking myself clever as you are by being truthful about my mental competency. Maybe I should have played right along and feign like I was crazy to keep from standing trial. Stanley youre starting to get the picture. The criminal justice system is corrupt and defendants who confess the truth end up in the slammer. Your public defenders and I helped you to win probation by confining you to an insane asylum for a whole year. Gee thanks and forgive me for developing the wrong impression! I thought maybe you resented me as your client. Of course not Stanley. I have a great deal admiration for sexual deviants.

57

Countertransference an overview

58

Judge Daily has treated me worse than a dog

Judges Dailey has treated me worse than a dog in the courtroom. I had asked Judge Dailey to allow me to testify at my own mental competency hearing and he told me no! Maybe I didnt bark loud enough for him to hear me. I clearly heard the bailiff say, Hear ye hear ye the court is now in session. Honorable Judge Dailey is presiding and all doing business with the court shall be heard. I presume that since it was my competency hearing that I had the legal right to testify under oath or speak to the judge. Maybe if he had allowed me to speak, then it may have prevented him wasting time sending me for a 30-day psychiatric evaluation I didnt need. Judge Dailey had a lawful duty to declare a mistrial for his error.

Two 30-day psychiatric evaluations

Mr. Green Judge Dailey has sent you MTMHI just last year around the same time for a 30-day psychiatric evaluation. We have sent Judge Dailey a letter stating you are mentally competent to stand trial. Why has Judge Lockard sent you back here at MTMHI for a second time? Well Doctor I must look crazy like I have an arrow stuck in my head. Mr. Green youre not crazy. I have scheduled surgery to have the arrow removed. Maybe you wont look so crazy to judges in Shelby County. Thanks doctor because I am really tired of being transported back and forth in the back of a van handcuffed and shackled like a prisoner.

59

Shelby County Sheriff Jail Transport Handcuffed and shackled

I was handcuffed and shackled when Sheriff Deputies transported me to Middle Tennessee Mental Health Institute (MTMHI) in Nashville, TN. I hadnt been convicted of any felony, nor was I a fugitive from justice. Rather, I had lawfully purchased a $5000 bail bond certificate from Brisco Bonding Company and complied to appear in court for my mental competency hearing as scheduled on the licensed docket. So, I couldnt understand why I was being bullied as if I were a convicted prisoner. According to American jurisprudence I was supposed to be presumed innocent until proven guilty. Yet, that isnt how our legal system operates here in Tennessee. I was guilty from day one and was mistreated by licensed bullies with indignity and disrespect of my legal rights. Never at any time did any licensed bully ask me if I wished to exercise my legal right of due process to file counterclaim against the states criminal complaint. They all pretended as if I didnt have any legal rights just so they can bully me around like I am a defenseless kid. Here I am a veteran soldier and they didnt have the decency to send me to VA Hospital for evaluation. I have an outstanding military record and I deserve to have been treated better than I was by licensed bullies abusing his or her canon oath.

60

Sex Offenders
Sex Offenders are no longer considered American citizens covered under our US Constitution. Tennessee General Assembly has hereby ordered each criminal defendant convicted of any sex crime to register his or her name with the Tennessee Sex Offender Registry (TSOR). TSOR shall be enforced by licensed bullies in violation of United States Constitution Section 9 paragraph 3. Sex Offenders who refuse to being unlawfully bullied by licensed bullies shall be arrested and prosecuted. Sex Offenders shall be stalked, harassed and publicly humiliated. Any public official that seeks to defend Sex Offenders legal rights to due process shall immediately be immediately booted out of public office.

Bill of Attainder?
The Judiciary Branch is the only branch with constitutional power to sentence criminal defendants to serve time. A bill of attainder is when Congress has passed a law to impose a sentence without due process. Ex-post facto is when Congress has enacted a law and the effective date is made retroactively. TSOR is a concealed form of state probation designed to circumvent due process. United States Department of Justice (USDOJ) has a lawful duty to uphold Section 9 paragraph 3 to protect Sex Offenders legal rights to due process. Otherwise, Congress will continue abusing its congressional powers to bully Sex Offenders. United States Constitution doesnt discriminate. All American citizens regardless of personal profile or minority classification are covered against being bullied.

61

Defending Constitutional Rights

US Constitution is the greatest weapon I have to defend me from licensed bullies in office. My Public Defenders have done all in his or her power to bully me while I was defending my constitutional rights. I didnt need for my licensed attorneys to lie about my mental competency to stand trial. Instead, I needed him or her to advocate in my behalf to the court that I Mr. Green am entitled the right to a speedy and fair trial. My legal rights have entitled me to file counterclaim against the states criminal charges, if I so choose to exercise my legal rights as a criminal defendant. I have made every legal effort to vociferate to the court that I suffer from criminal offenses being imposed upon me by the state and I demand to be heard in a court of law. I had every legal right to lodge my ethical complaints with the Board of Professional Responsibility (BPR) and Court of the Judiciary (COJ) seeking disciplinary actions against my Public Defenders trying to bully me defend my constitutional rights.

Conflict of Interest
Shelby County District Attorney Generals Office (DA) had a legal obligation to warrant my due process. Yet, the DA has a conflict of interest role serving as the prosecution. I have lawfully testified under oath to the court during my Limine Hearing that I have suffered from criminal offenses being imposed upon me. I have demanded to exercise my legal right to file my counterclaim. Nobody from the DAs Office has approached me knowing I have testified under oath to serve as witness of criminal infractions of law against me. In essence the DA has omitted to carry out its lawful duty to protect me as a criminal defendant pursuant my Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments legal rights. The latter is an egregious violation of my legal rights to due process.

62

Jury Trial
A jury trial is a mandatory component of any criminal trial. Only the defendant has the legal right to waive a jury trial. Mistrial is an errant due process issue making a trial null and void. Thirteenth Amendment has stipulated the legal criteria for punishment of crime is the party must have been duly convicted. The legal definition of duly simply means the conviction must be gained through due process of law. If due process has been corrupted the Judiciary is obligated to overturn the verdict through Court of Appeals, State Supreme Court or US Supreme Court as the highest appellate court to overturn rulings.

Stenographer
The stenographer is the most important person in the courtroom. The role of the stenographer is to prepare a typed transcript of any criminal trial. The latter serves as an official record of statements made in the courtroom by judges, prosecutors, attorneys and/or witnesses. Any appeals court, public official or individual citizen may subpoena or buy a copy of the official transcript. The transcript makes it possible for verdicts to be overturned by appeals court. Statute of limitation for due process issues is unlimited or never runs out. The stenographer is one of the few court officers that havent practiced bullying criminal defendants. Instead, they do their jobs in a professional and respectful manner in accordance to due process.

63

Counterclaim against criminal complaint

Whenever a plaintiff files a criminal complaint, then the defendant has the right to file a counterclaim. The criminal complaint and counterclaim must be sent to the Grand Jury to determine probable cause. The Grand Jury decides whether to issue an indictment empowering the District Attorney General to investigate either complaint respectively. If the defendant has walked pass the counter to file a counterclaim, then he or she has waived his or her legal right to be represented by the DAs Office. So, it is always safer to file a counterclaim for equal protection.

Criminal Trial
A criminal trial must be free of any deprivation of the defendants United States Constitutional Rights or Civil Rights. The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments have placed a legal burden on licensed officers to exercise oversight to warrant due process of criminal trials. Each licensed officer has a lawful duty to carry out the law in a respectful manner to treat criminal defendants as an innocent person rather than a convicted prisoner. Due process in a criminal trial is free of any bullying by the prosecutor to coerce a guilty verdict. Rather, the goal is to gather evidences and/or present testimonies for jurors to render unbiased verdicts. American jurisprudence is purposed to prevent miscarriage of justice being imposed upon an innocent person even at risk of acquitting a guilty person.

64

Run for your lives!!!

Run for your lives!!! Excuse me press reporters: Vice President Biden didnt actually mean run for your lives he means jogging is good for you. Mr. Vice President, can you clarify your statement for the press? What I meant to say is that we as public officials have become licensed bullies. The No Fear Act applies only to government personnel. Any public official may exercise his or her public seat of office to bully citizens around whether he or she likes it or not. If President Obama says you need to buy Affordable Health Care, then by golly our administration stands behind him 100%. You must realize that America is no longer a free nation with freedom of choice. Rather, we have been converted to the doctrine that bullying is the American way!

Keep your coins I want change

Mr. Vice President public officials have been bullying me around before President Obama came into office and they are still bullying me around. What has happened to freedom of choice? When our little children see adult men and women in public office acting as bullies, then they pattern after their behaviors. A bunch of thugs have been bullying me, because I panhandle to make a living. Thugs are no worse than the public officials who have abused their public office passing laws to bully me from finding gainful employment due to my felony. Do me a favor and ask President Obama to change this before he leaves office. Otherwise, my life wont be worth a plugged nickel.

65

Change We Can Believe In

President Barack Obama has run his first political campaign on the theme Change we can believe in. He serves as our Commander in Chief of our US Armed Forces and President of our US White House. He has formerly served as a professor at Chicago Law School teaching constitutional law. The change I have envision is for our judiciary to carry out it lawful duty to uphold our US Constitution due process. The latter would steer our nation in the right direction. As it stands today criminal defendants have been denied filing counterclaims.

Eric H. Holder, Jr.

President Obama has appointed Eric H. Holder, Jr. to serve as our United States Attorney General. US Department of Justice (USDOJ) is the eminent authority in charge to administrate our Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments guarantee of due process in behalf of criminal defendants. USDOJ may not discriminate against any person regardless of personal profile. Discrimination is a form of bullying by depriving minority classes equal access to government agencies or public accommodations. Criminal defendants have been bullied from gaining equal access to the Attorney Generals Office to file counterclaims against criminal charges. As a result, due process has not been legally enforced.

66

Writ of Mandamus
Writ of Mandamus is a powerful legal instrument to command a lawful duty to be carried out. It is an order handed down from a higher court to a lower court. In rare cases have writ of mandamus been upheld. It serves as final alternative when no other recourse of action has remedied the situation. Often time officials in high ranking position have omitted to carry out his or her lawful duties. Plaintiffs who are lawfully seeking writ of mandamus may compel action by proving three (3) legal components. 1) A lawful duty exist. 2) A lawful duty isnt being carried out. 3) All recourse of remedy has been exhausted. A final decision is thereafter rendered.

Superior Court of California

Superior Court of California for the County of San Diego has written a decision of an administrative mandamus. Professor Timothy Cliffe, Petitioner has filed a mandamus against the Office of Administrative Hearings and the Governing Board of the GROSSMOUNT-CUYAMA Community College District to command licensed bullies carry out their lawful duties to him. There are three components that Professor Cliffe had to prove. 1. Lawful duty exist 2. Lawful duty not being performed 3. All other recourse have been exhausted Professor Cliffe wasnt going to allow himself to be bullied around when he knew the Respondents were omitting to perform their lawful duties to him.

67

What is a Writ of Mandamus?

68

USDOJ Subpoena Court Transcripts

I demand the United States Department of Justice (USDOJ) subpoena my court transcripts to see whether my legal rights have been violated by licensed bullies in Shelby County Justice Center (SCJC). Judge Joseph Dailey Div. V. denied my right to testify at my own competency hearing qualified me for a mistrial. I have lawfully purchased a $5000 dollar criminal bond for my release pending my trial date being set. Judge Joseph Dailey forfeited my $5000 bond in blatant violation of TCA 40-11-120 Forfeiture of bail deposit and ordered me incarcerated in Shelby County Justice Center (SCJC). I havent been cited for any violations that justify forfeiture of my $5000 bail bond. I remained incarcerated well over a year in SCJC with Brisco Bonding Company holding my bail deposit. Judge Dailey has neglected to sign an order for Brisco Bonding Company to refund my bail deposit pursuant TCA 40-11205 Refund of forfeiture payments reversal. William Keys, Shelby County Criminal Court Clerk has invoiced me to pay fines for each day of my incarceration. However, my incarceration was unconstitutional in that I had lawfully purchased a $5000 bail bond certificate. USDOJ has legal jurisdiction to prosecute criminal infractions of public officials breaking the law. After Larry Southard, Director Forensic Services had written a letter to Judge Dailey to dispel issues involving my mental competency to stand trial, then Judge Dailey should have reinstated my bond and ordered me released from incarceration. The bottom line is I actually was extorted out of $500 for a bail bond that was worthless to me as the defendant. I am legally entitled to remuneration by the Judiciary with punitive damages for my pain and suffering, because I have been denied my right to mistrial.

69

Request for testifying at competency hearing Request for reinstatement of $5000 bail bond Request for refund after forfeiture of bail bond Request for discovery evidence during pre-trial Request for filing counterclaim against charges Request for fair and speedy trial without delays Request for mistrial due to deprivation of rights Request for attorney recusal and self-representation Request for diversion as my fist-time felony offense Request for restoration of voting rights after probation

Request to plead guilty to incest

70

Denied due process

I have been denied due process. My case should have been declared a mistrial. Each request I have made concerning my mental competency hearing and/or criminal trial has been stamped denied except for one. When I requested to plead guilty to incest it has been stamped approved. Justice has been served the American way (with licensed officers bullying weaker citizens)! I dont have a license to practice law. Even if I did I wouldnt abuse my license to bully my legal clients. I have sufficient education to read the law for myself to know what my legal rights are. I knew each time when licensed attorneys were pulling my leg to jack me around and deprive me of my entitlements.

My licensed attorney talking trash

Mr. Green let me give you some sound legal advice. Plead guilty to incest and accept a six-year plea bargain offer for probation. Of course now the judge cant give you diversion because you will be a convicted sex offender. Yet, thats no big deal! Trust me I am a licensed attorney and I know the law. Now Mr. Green if you decide to take your case to trial I can guarantee youll lose and will be sentenced to life imprisonment. Attorney can I exercise my legal right to file a counterclaim against the state? I have a good case I think I could win. No sir Mr. Green the law doesnt work like that. If the state has committed any crimes against you, then suck it up and dont let it get you down. The only legal right you have under the law is to defend criminal charges of the state against you!