FEASIBILITY REVIEW FORM

( F 030100 )
DATE
REF NO.

:
:

CUSTOMER

PART NO. (WITH REV NO)

PART DESCRIPTION

P.O NO. (WITH LATEST MOD. STATUS):

REQUIREMENTS
I

TECHNICAL REVIEW

a.

ENGG. SPECS.

b.

TOLERANCING STD.

c.

MATL. SPECS.

d.

a.

TECH. CAPABILITY
QUALITY REQUIREMENT
REVIEW
SAMPLING METHOD

b.

TEST PROCEDURES

c.

REQ. OF TEST CERT.

d.

a.

OTHERS
PROCESS REQUIREMENT
REVIEW
MFG. CAPABILITY

b.

PROCESS INST.

c.

a.

PKG. INSTRUC TIONS

COMMERCIAL
REQUIREMENT REVIEW
EXCISE FORM

b.

OTHER SP. REQ.

c.

a.

PRICE
DELIVERY REQUIREMENT
REVIEW
DATE

b.

SCHEDULES

VI

CAPACITY REVIEW

a.

ADEQUATE

II

III

IV

REVIEW COMMENTS

Page 1 of 3

REQUIREMENTS
VII

CONTRACTUALS

a.

Approval of (by customer)

i)

FMEA (Prior to PPAP)

ii)

Control Plans
Control Plans
(Unstable & Non Capable)
Acceptance Criteria
(Visual Aids)
Requirements of Customer
Special Characteristics

iii)
iv)
b.
i)

v)

Customer Approved SubContractor

Customer Verification of SubContracted Product
Preliminary Process Capability

vi)

Traceability

vii)

Ongoing Process Performance

ix)

Control Plan Review

xi)

Statistical Verification of Job

Set-up

xii)

PPAP for Process Changes

xiii)

Appearance Item Designation

xv)

Layout Inspection

xvi)

Functional Performances

xvii)

Measurement Data (Instruments)

xviii)

Additional Verification Stage

xix)

Packaging & Labels

xxi)

Quality Record Evaluation

ii)
iii)

REVIEW COMMENTS

Page 2 of 3

PPAP REQUIREMENTS
(To be acknowledged by the customer)
I.

SUBMISSION LEVEL

II

IS SUBMISSION REQUIRED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:

REQUIREMENT REVIEW COMMENT
Use of alternative material
New / Modified Tools
Tool / Equipment Re-furnished / Rearranged
Change in process / method of
manufacture
Transfer of Tool / Equipment to a
different location
Change of sub-contractors
Product Re-release after 12 months
Customer request to suspend
shipment

a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.

REVIEW BY
Prototype Control Plan at development stage
Special Characteristics (Process Sheets)

:
:

iii)

Customer Approved Sub Contractor

Customer Verification of Sub-Contracted

Product
v) Preliminary Process Capability
vi) Traceability
vii) When PPK not Achieved
viii) Ongoing Process Performance
ix) Control Plan Review (After Correction)
x) Higher Or Lower Capability
xi) Statistical Verification of job set up
xii) PPAP for Process Changes
xiii) Appearance Item Designation
xiv) Accredited Lab Facilities
xv) Layout Inspection
xvi) Functional Performance
xvii) Measurement Data (Instruments)
xviii) Additional Verification Stage
xix) Packaging & Labels
xx) Quality Records Evaluation

III

IV

CUSTOMER REPRESENTATIVE

i)
ii)
iv)

II

As specified by the customer

by default identifies its own, if not specified
If customer suggests any sub-contractor from his
approved list

To be specified in the P.O. Else taken as NA

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

Default value > 1.67

To be specified in P.O. Else taken as NA
Default Stringent Control Plan
Default value > 1.33
Default Implemented immediately
Default value > 1.33
Default on control charts with n=3
Default Level 3 if PPAP Manual
NA
Proposed to ISO Guide 25
Default Ad described in Control Plan
Default Ad described in Completion
To be specified in P.O. Else taken as NA
Default - as per Flow Chart
To be specified by the Customer Else Default
To be specified in P.O. Else taken as NA

Page 3 of 3