Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
According to Hayden White, every history is shaped by its metahistory !that is, the archetypal historical narrative that the historian "ses to shape and str"ct"re a story abo"t the past. #etahistories are not embedded in the past!they are imposed on the past, to give it contin"ity, coherency, and meaning. #etahistories pre$ig"re the histories %e %rite. #etahistories have $o"r components. Plot &adapted $rom 'orthrop (rye, Anatomy of Criticism) Romance: a drama o$ sel$*identi$ication symboli+ed by the hero,s transcendence o$ the %orld o$ e-perience, his victory over it, and his $inal liberation $rom it. &.) Tragedy: /n 0ragedy, there are no $estive occasions, e-cept $alse or ill"sory ones1 rather, there are intimations o$ states o$ division among men more terrible than that %hich incited the tragic agony at the beginning o$ the drama. 2till, the $all o$ the protagonist and the shaking o$ the %orld he inhabits %hich occ"r at the end o$ the 0ragic play are not regarded as totally threatening to those %ho s"rvive the agonic test. 0here has been a gain in conscio"sness $or the spectators o$ the contest. And this gain is tho"ght to consist in the epiphany o$ the la% governing h"man e-istence %hich the protagonist,s e-ertions against the %orld have bro"ght to pass. 0he reconciliations that occ"r at the end o$ 0ragedy are . . . somber1 they are more in the nat"re o$ resignations o$ men to the conditions "nder %hich they m"st labor in the %orld. 0heses conditions, in t"rn, are asserted to be inalterable and eternal, and the implication is that man cannot change them b"t m"st %ork %ithin them. 0hey set the limits o$ %hat may be aspired to and %hat may be legitimately aimed at in the 3"est $or sec"rity and sanity in the %orld. &4) Comedy: /n 5omedy, hope is held o"t $or the temporary tri"mph o$ man over his %orld by the prospect o$ occasional reconciliations o$ the $orces at play in the social and nat"ral %orlds. 0he reconciliations %hich occ"r at the end o$ 5omedy are reconciliations o$ men %ith men, o$ men %ith their %orld and society1 the condition o$ society is represented as being p"rer, saner, and healthier as a res"lt o$ the con$lict among seemingly inalterable opposed elements in the %orld1 these elements are revealed to be, in the long r"n, harmoni+able %ith one another, "ni$ied, at one %ith themselves and the others. &4)
Satire: 0he archetypal theme o$ 2atire is the precise opposite o$ 6the7 8omantic drama o$ redemption1 it is, in $act, a drama o$ diremption, a drama dominated by the apprehension that man is "ltimately a captive o$ the %orld rather than its master, and by the recognition that, in the $inal analysis, h"man conscio"sness and %ill are al%ays inade3"ate to the task o$ overcoming de$initively the dark $orce o$ death, %hich is man,s "nremitting enemy. &4) 8omance and 2atire %o"ld appear to be mutually exclusive %ays o$ emplotting the processes o$ reality. . . . 5omedy and 0ragedy represent qualifications o$ the 8omantic apprehension o$ the %orld, considered as a process, in the interest o$ taking serio"sly the $orces %hich oppose the e$$ort at h"man redemption naively held "p as a possibility $or mankind in 8omance. 5omedy and 0ragedy take con$lict serio"sly, even i$ the $orm event"ates in a vision o$ the "ltimate reconciliation o$ opposed $orces and the latter in a revelation o$ the nat"re o$ the $orces opposing man on the other. And it is possible $or the 8omantic %riter to assimilate the tr"ths o$ h"man e-istence revealed in 5omedy and 0ragedy respectively %ithin the str"ct"re o$ the drama o$ redemption %hich he $ig"res in his vision o$ the "ltimate victory o$ man over the %orld o$ e-perience. &4*9:) Formal Argument Formist: 0he (ormist theory o$ tr"th aims at the identi$ication o$ the "ni3"e characteristics o$ ob;ects inhabiting the historical $ield. Accordingly, the (ormist considers an e-planation to be complete %hen a given set o$ ob;ects has been property identi$ied, its class, generic, and speci$ic attrib"tes assigned, and labels attesting to its partic"larity attached to it. 0he ob;ects all"ded to may be either individ"alities or collectivities, partic"lars or "niversals, concrete entities or abstractions. . . . When the historian has established the "ni3"eness o$ the partic"lar ob;ects in the $ield or the variety o$ the types o$ phenomena %hich the $ield mani$ests, he has provided a (ormist e-planation o$ the $ield as s"ch. &9<* 9=) Mechanistic: #echanism is inclined to vie% the >acts, o$ the >agents, inhabiting the historical $ield as mani$estations o$ e-trahistorical >agencies, that have their origins in the >scene, %ithin %hich the >action, depicted in the narrative "n$olds. 0he #echanistic theory o$ e-planation t"rns "pon the search $or the ca"sal la%s that determine the o"tcomes o$ processes discovered in the historical $ield. 0he ob;ects that are tho"ght to inhabit the historical $ield are constr"ed as e-isting in the modality o$ part*part relationships, the speci$ic con$ig"rations o$ %hich are determined by the la%s that are pres"med to govern their interactions. . . . Ultimately, $or the #echanist, an e-planation is considered complete only %hen he has discovered the la%s that are pres"med to govern history in the same %ay that the la%s o$ physics are pres"med to govern nat"re. &9?)
Organistic: 0he @rganist attempts to depict the partic"lars discerned in the historical $ield as components o$ synthetic processes. At the heart o$ the @rganicist strategy is a metaphysical commitment to the paradigm o$ the microcosmic*macrocosmic relationship1 and the @rganicist historian %ill tend to be governed by the desire to see individ"al entities as components o$ processes %hich aggregate into %holes that are greater than, or 3"alitatively di$$erent $rom, the s"m o$ their parts. &9A) /t is characteristic o$ @rganicist strategies o$ e-planation to esche% the search $or the la%s o$ historical process, %hen the term >la%s, is constr"ed in the sense o$ "niversal and invariant ca"sal relationships. . . . 0he @rganicist is inclined to talk abo"t the >principles, or >ideas, that in$orm the individ"al process discerned in the $ield and all the processes taken as a %hole. 0hese principles or ideas are seen as imaging or pre$ig"ring the end to%ard %hich the process as a %hole tends. &9B) Contextualist: 0he in$orming pres"pposition o$ 5onte-t"alism is that events can be e-plained by being set %ithin the >conte-t, o$ their occ"rrence. Why they occ"rred as they did is to be e-plained by the revelation o$ the speci$ic relationships they bore to other events occ"rring in their circ"mambient historical space. Here, as in (ormism, the historical $ield is apprehended as a >spectacle, or richly te-t"red arras %eb %hich on $irst glance appears to lack coherence and any discernible $"ndamental str"ct"re. B"t, "nlike the (ormist, %ho is inclined simply to consider entities in their partic"larity and "ni3"eness!i.e., their similarity to, and di$$erence $rom, other entities in the $ield!the 5onte-t"alist insists that >%hat happened, in the $ield can be acco"nted $or by the speci$ication o$ the $"nctional interrelationships e-isting among the agents and agencies occ"pying the $ield at any given time. &9?*9.) Trope &see Hayden White on 0ropes) #etaphor #etonymy 2ynecdoche /rony Ideological Implication Anarchist 8adical 5onservative Ciberal