0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
27 vues6 pages
This paper gives an analysis of variation of the physiological signals of a person with respect to the stress developed within him / her. The analysis was done using ECG and respiratory signals acquired from the automobile drivers. Heart rate was used as the marker signal for analyzing the variations in the extracted physiological feature signals.
This paper gives an analysis of variation of the physiological signals of a person with respect to the stress developed within him / her. The analysis was done using ECG and respiratory signals acquired from the automobile drivers. Heart rate was used as the marker signal for analyzing the variations in the extracted physiological feature signals.
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
This paper gives an analysis of variation of the physiological signals of a person with respect to the stress developed within him / her. The analysis was done using ECG and respiratory signals acquired from the automobile drivers. Heart rate was used as the marker signal for analyzing the variations in the extracted physiological feature signals.
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
Automobile Drivers. Karthik Soman, Varghese Alex, Chaithanya Srinivas # M. Tech Bio Medical Dept. #Asst. Prof. Bio Medical Dept. VIT University, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India. karthi.soman@gmail.com
Abstract This paper gives an analysis of variation of the physiological signals of a person with respect to the stress developed within him/her. The analysis was done using ECG and respiratory signals acquired from the automobile drivers who were made to drive on different road conditions to get different stress levels. As a part of analysis, we extracted two feature signals from the above said physiological signals. QRS power spectrum and the breathing rate were the two feature signals that were extracted from the mentioned physiological signals. Heart rate was used as the marker signal for analyzing the variations in the extracted physiological feature signals. The variations in the feature signals with respect to the stress were expressed in terms of correlation coefficients and were tabulated. The analysis clearly showed the changes in the feature signals with respect to the stress of the driver. It showed a direct proportionate relation in the QRS power and the breathing rate with respect to the stress of the driver. The analysis also showed that QRS power signal is a better feature signal for analyzing the stress since it showed more correlation with the heart rate marker signal. The analysis points out the fact that the physiological signals can be used as a metric for monitoring the stress of a person. KeywordsStress, QRS power, ECG, breathing rate, respiratory signal, correlation coefficient. I. INTRODUCTION American Psychological Association defines stress as any uncomfortable emotional experience accompanied by predictable biochemical, physiological and behavioral changes. Reaction of a person from a normal state to an exited state in order to preserve his/her integrity can also be defined as stress. An extreme amount of stress can produce extreme health issues and it can affect the cardiovascular and central nervous system. Analysis of stress of a person has got many applications. Modern automobiles incorporate an intelligent system to monitor the stress level of the driver inside it to ensure the safety. According to the US census bureau, 10% of the total road accidents in 2005 were caused due to the distraction of the drivers during driving. The number rose to 16% in 2009. Another statistics given by the Network of Employers for Traffic Safety (NETS) say that 20-50% of the accidents are caused due drivers distraction. These statistical results show the importance of analysis of stress in a person. Stressful mind does not produce a constructive result. In this paper, analysis of the stress is done using the ECG and the respiratory signals acquired from the automobile drivers. Stress of an automobile driver is highly correlated to heart rate and Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) [1]. We intend to analyze the stress in a different way using different feature signals extracted from the ECG and the respiratory signal. This study can pave the way for more options of physiological signal features that reflect the stress of a person. It is proved that the heart rate and the galvanic skin resistance are the two features that are highly correlated with the stress of a person. Using this result, the analysis was done in this paper by taking heart rate as the marker signal. In this paper QRS power was the feature signal extracted from the ECG signal of the driver. The methodology of the extraction of the feature signals is explained below. This feature signal was further correlated with the marker signal. It was able to see a clear variation in the correlation when the stress varies. Breathing rate was the feature signal extracted from the respiratory signals. This was also correlated with the stress marker signal. Both feature signals showed a direct relation with the stress marker signal. The analysis is finally tabulated to check the change in the correlation coefficients of the feature signals with respect to the stress marker signal. The authors like to acknowledge Dr. Jennifer. A. Healy and Dr. Rosalind. W. Picard for providing the signals required for the analysis through Physionet database. In this paper, we have discussed the method by which they have acquired the signals. Dr. Jennifer A. Healy and Dr. Rosalind W. Picard conducted the experiment in such a way that the drivers were made to drive the car in 3 different situations such as highway road with less traffic, busy road like a city and road having toll [1]. These 3 different types of roads gave less, high and medium stresses to the driver respectively. The less traffic road was completed within 1000 seconds and busy road was completed in 500 seconds and toll was completed in around 150 seconds. The driving was continued and the total drive took around 50 min to 1.5 hrs. In this paper, analysis was done for the first 30 min since the driver has passed through all the stress conditions within this 30 min. For acquiring the signals, 4 types of sensors were used such as ECG, EMG, EDR and respiratory sensors. ECG was used in lead 2 configuration for reducing the motion artifacts and getting a high R peak amplitude. EMG was acquired from the trapezius muscle on the shoulder. GSR/EDR was obtained from the foot and the 978-1-4673-5090-7/13/$31.00 2013 IEEE 574
hand. Hand GSR was acquired from the first and middle finger of the left hand and the foot GSR was obtained from the arch of the sole of the left foot. The respiratory signals were acquired using an elastic Hall Effect sensor strapped around the drivers diaphragm. The signals were acquired as per the expansion of the chest cavity of the driver. All these analog signals were converted digitally by a Flex Comp A/D converter. This also provided isolation of the driver from the power supply. II. METHODOLOGY A. ECG Feature extraction Electro Cardio Gram is the graphical plot of electrical activity of the heart. The important parts of an ECG are P wave, QRS complex and T wave. Each wave has its own biological importance. P wave corresponds to the atrial depolarization, QRS complex corresponds to ventricular depolarization along with atrial re polarization and finally T wave represents ventricular re polarization. Since pumping of the heart to all parts of the body via aorta takes place during ventricular depolarization, QRS complex has got the maximum amplitude. Hence QRS complex is a good feature that can be extracted from the ECG for the studies of pumping of heart. In this paper, QRS power from each cycle of ECG is used as the feature signal. This analysis will help to know about the pumping variation of the heart with respect to the stress of the person. For the feature extraction, the steps followed are: QRS detection QRS extraction Power estimation Feature Signal formation. a. QRS detection It is done by using Pan Tompkins Algorithm [2,3]. The algorithm was implemented in the following way: Input Bandpass filter Derivative filter Squaring Integrator Output. Bandpass filter was implemented by cascading one low pass filer with cut off frequency of 11 Hz and a high pass filter with cut off frequency of 5 Hz. The recursive filter transfer function for the low pass filter is B (z) = 1S2 (1-z -6 ) 2 (1-z -1 ) 2 (1) The High pass filter was implemented using an all pass filter minus low pass filter. Band pass filter = All Pass filter Low Pass filter. The transfer function for the High pass filter is Bhp = z -16 - 1S2 Blp(z) (2) Blp (z) = (1-z -32 ) (1-z -1 ) (3) Low pass filter provides attenuation greater than 35 dB at 60 Hz and hence it suppresses the power line interference. It introduces a delay of 5 samples. High pass filter also introduces a delay of 13 samples. This has to be compensated finally while extracting the QRS complex from the ECG signal. Derivative filter functions in such a way that it will suppress the low frequency components such as P and T waves and it will enhance the high frequency QRS complex. The filter equation for the derivative operation is y (n) = 18 |2 x(n) + x(n-1) - x(n-S) - 2x(n-4)] (4) Squaring operation is done to enhance the QRS complex by making the result positive and emphasizing large differences from QRS complex. It also suppresses the P and T waves. The output of the derivative operator will have multiple peaks within the duration of a single QRS complex. In order to smoothen this output a moving window integrator is used. The window width has to be selected in such a way that it should enclose the QRS complex only. If the window length is too small it produces multiple peaks, if it is large width it will enclose T wave also. In this paper a window width of 31 was used and got a good output. Fig 2 shows the output of the Pan Tompkins algorithm for the first 1000 samples. After the QRS detection, the nest stage is to extract the QRS complex from the ECG signal by taking the index of the pulses in the output of the Pan Tomkins algorithm after giving the time delay compensation. The extracted QRS complex signal is further taken for the QRS power estimation. The power estimation is done by using the Welch method [4]. The reason for choosing Welch method for power estimation is because it takes the average of the modified periodogram of the portioned segments of the signal so that the output of the Welch power spectrum will be a smoothened one. Hanning window of length 6 is used for the PSD calculation. Window equation is: w (n) = u.S (1 - cos (2 (nN))), u < n <N (5) The power equation using Welch method is: P QRS (fn) = 1K _ I k ( n ) K k=1 (6) Ik (fn) = L0 Ak(n) 2 (7) Ak (n) = 1L _ X k (])w(])c -2k]nL L-1 ]=0 (8) 0 = 1L _ w 2 (]) L-1 ]=0 (9) L is the length of the window. K is the number of segments of the input. A k is the Fourier transform of the k th segment. I k is the modified periodogram of the k th segement. P QRS is the average of the periodograms of all the K segments. Fig 1 shows the Power Spectral Density obtained using Welch method for all the QRS complexes extracted. The estimated power of the QRS complex from a single cycle is averaged so that such averaged power of the QRS 575
complex formed the feature signal for the analysis. Fig 3 shows the feature signal extracted from the ECG signal. The feature signal thus formed is classified based on the mean value of the QRS power. Those powers above the mean value are taken as high power and the other as low power. Heart rate reflects the stress of the person. Hence heart rate was taken as the marker signal which reflected the stress of the driver. Heart rate and the stress showed a direct relation i.e. as the stress of the person increases the heart rate also increases. Hence the heart rate signal was classified based on a threshold value of 80 in such a way that those heart beat above the threshold were classified as high stress marker signal and the other as the low stress marker signal. Comparison is made between the QRS power, both high and low power, to high stress and low stress marker signals for 10 drivers. Comparison is made by calculating the correlation coefficients between the corresponding QRS power and the stress marker signals. The equation for the correlation coefficient is: i = C (x,) c x c j
(11) C (x, y) = E {(x (n) - x) (y (n + k) - y)] (12) r = correlation coefficient C (x, y) = Cross Covariance of x and y = Standard deviation. E { } = Expectation value The correlation coefficients were tabulated. The comparison between the correlation coefficients pointed out the fact that the high stress condition of a person is more correlated to high QRS power than low power and low stress condition is more correlated to low QRS power. Table 1 shows the list of correlation coefficients corresponding to the stress and power. B. Respiratory signal Feature extraction Respiratory signals are the reflections of breathing of a person. Here, the respiratory signals were acquired in response to the expansion of the chest using a Hall Effect transducer tied on the diaphragm area of the person. The feature signal extracted from the respiratory signal was the number of breaths per minute or the breathing rate of the person. Fig4 shows the respiratory signal for 5 min. The feature extraction from the respiratory signal is conducted by detecting the peaks in the signal per minute. Since each peak corresponds to a chest expansion, the number of peaks detected shows the breathing rate of the person. This feature signal is divided in to high breathing rate and low breathing rate by giving a threshold value. Here, mean of the breathing rate in 30 min is taken as the threshold. Fig5 shows the respiratory feature signal for 30 minutes. The two respiratory feature signals are then compared with the same stress marker signals used in ECG analysis by calculating the correlation coefficients for 10 different drivers. The result of comparison of the breathing rate with the stress marker signal showed that high breathing rate was more correlated to high stress condition while the low breathing rate was more correlated to low stress condition. III. RESULTS The result of comparison is tabulated as shown in Table 1. 1. ECG results It is clear from Table 1 that, high QRS power is more correlated to high stress condition and low QRS power to low stress condition. Biological interpretation of the above result is that, during high stress condition, the left ventricle of the heart pumps the blood in high power, which in turn produces high blood pressure. In case of low stress the left ventricle of the heart pumps the blood in a low power so that the blood pressure also will be normal. That is why it is said that stressful persons are more prone to cardiovascular diseases [5]. Practices such as meditation, yoga will help to reduce stress and will help the person to be healthier. 2. Respiration results From the table it is clear that, high breathing rate is more correlated to high stress condition and low breathing rate is more correlated to low stress condition. This leads to a fact that during stressful conditions the breathing becomes rapid. Biological interpretation of the above result is that at stressful condition the pattern of breath becomes rapid and shallow. It is proved that, during that time message will be sent to the adrenal gland and releases stress hormones like cortisol [5], whereas during lower stress the breathing pattern is slow and deep thus the number breaths per minute is low. The correlation value varies from person to person. But it is clearly visible from Table 1 that even though the values change from person to person the correlation between the stress and the feature signals maintain the same gradation i.e. high stress will be correlated more with high QRS power and high breathing rate. The mean value of the correlation values for the high stress and high QRS power taken for 10 drivers is 0.27156, for low stress and low QRS power it is 0.2574. In case of high stress and high breathing rate the mean value is 0.2629 and for low stress and low breathing rate it is 0.252. Hence, QRS power is a better feature signal compared to breathing rate to analyze the stress of a person since it showed a higher correlation value to heart rate. IV. CONCLUSION The analysis done in this paper clearly proved the variation of physiological parameters with respect to the stress developed. It is a scientific explanation for the cardiac and respiratory problems occurring in the persons who are stressful. Persons with stressful minds are prone to heart diseases since their ventricles take an extra power to pump the blood and this will increase the blood pressure which will cause the problems of hypertension. In the present days most of the people are undergoing stress and it is good to perform practices which can reduce their stress which will make them healthy. 576
As a part of future research, it is possible to analyze other physiological signals which can give a higher metric for stress analysis. In this paper only a single category of subject was taken i.e. automobile drivers. The comparison of stress between different categories of subjects also will help to study about the stress in a better way. That also can be taken as a future aspect of the research. From the light of the research conducted for this paper the overall conclusion is that, how much stress we reduce, that much healthier we become.
Fig 1. Power Spectral Density obtained using Welch method for all the QRS complexes extracted (Driver 1) 577
Fig 2. Output of the Pan Tompkins algorithm for the first 1000 samples (Driver 1)
Fig 3. ECG feature signal (Driver 1)
Fig 4. Respiratory signal for 5 minutes (Driver 1) Fig 5 Respiratory feature signal for 30 min (Driver1)
578
TABLE 1. RESULT OF ANALYSIS OF ECG AND RESPIRATORY SIGNALS WITH RESPECT TO STRESS
Driver
ECG signal analysis correlation coefficients
Respiratory signal analysis correlation coefficients High Stress High Power High Stress Low Power Low Stress- High Power Low stress Low Power High stress High breathing rate High stress Low breathing rate Low stress High breathing rate Low stress - Low breathing rate 1 0.258 0.136 0.171 0.289 0.327 0.241 0.1076 0.228 2 0.260 0.1338 0.148 0.231 0.269 0.146 0.165 0.247 3 0.239 0.153 0.129 0.256 0.218 0.107 0.151 0.254 4 0.244 0.128 0.155 0.253 0.280 0.124 0.157 0.218 5 0.287 0.138 0.1303 0.242 0.239 0.131 0.122 0.214 6 0.398 0.201 0.150 0.257 0.257 0.180 0.116 0.283 7 0.262 0.110 0.103 0.245 0.266 0.149 0.185 0.263 8 0.2776 0.143 0.107 0.241 0.290 0.162 0.140 0.258 9 0.231 0.185 0.181 0.294 0.247 0.122 0.116 0.282 10 0.259 0.142 0.141 0.266 0.236 0.129 0.137 0.273 ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors like to acknowledge Dr. Jennifer A. Healey and Dr. Rosalind W. Picard for acquiring the signals which was used in this paper for the analysis. REFERENCES [1] Jennifer A. Healy and Rosalind W. Picard, Detecting Stress During Real-World Driving Tasks Using Physiological Sensors, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation systems, vol. 6, no. 2, June 2005. [2] Jiapu Pan and Willis J. Tompkins, A Real Time QRS Detection Algorithm, IEEE Transactions on Bio Medical Engienering, vol. BME-32, no. 3, March 1985. [3] Rangaraj M. Rangayyan, Bio Medical Signal Analysis A Case Study Approach, 4 th ed. IEEE press, 2009. [4] P.D. Welch, A Direct Digital Method of Power Spectrum Estimation,IBM Journal, April 1961. [5] K.J.W Wilson, Anne Waugh, Janet S. Ross, Ross and Wilson Anatomy and Physiology in Health and Illness, 8 th ed. Churchill Livingston, 1996.