360 Appraisals Format Name of the Organisation Period of Appraisal: From To: Name of the Employee Empl.Code No.

Department/Section: I. First Level Appraisal Self Appraisal! To "e completed "y employee concerned! #. $ole %odel: &o' far yo( are a $ole %odel to yo(r S(")ordinates* Spea+ the Tr(th! P(nct(ality Total/Partial $easons thereof! Personal Cleanliness , &o(se)+eeping , Sharing -no'ledge/Teaching/Training , Participati.e Approach , /n)"iased $elationship , Confidence in yo(r s(")ordinates , Time %anagement , Stress Control , 0. %anagement S(pport: Pl tic+! Total/Partial $easons thereof!

1hat S(pports that yo( got to perform 'ell* %an)po'er/Systems/En2oy)'or+ing/Delegation/Confidence/%oti.ation/ 3eadership/Comm(nication/Training Can yo( 4(antify in 5ge/any n(merical .al(e on 6o(r 7al(e Addition to the Organisation/Department 8oals* 9f so s(pply the n(merical .al(e. m(st match 'ith e.idences! 1hat pre.ented yo( that yo( co(ld not perform 'ell or at times* To 'hat e:tent! ;. S(ggestions: For Self: Training Needs 9dentified "y self! Department<s Proced(res/Systems/ From %anagement: =e specific and gi.e e.idential s(pport! %an)po'er/Systems/A(tomation/%echani>ation/Training/ -no'ledge Aids/1elfare/Asserti.eness for ne:t higher position/ Change in ?o" Description/Designation/$ole Clarify/Addl. $esponsi"ility @ A(thority Signat(re: Dated:

II Second Level of 360 Degree Appraisal To "e apprised "y S(")ordinates!: E:cellent AB ) C.B ha.e f(llest Satisfaction and (nderstanding 8ood C.B D ;.B =etter "(t needs impro.ement =e specific! Poor ;.A ) A Strained $elations =e specific! E.idences for negati.e rating need not e:plained hereE "(t it can "e sorted o(t At the time of Performance co(nseling "y the S(periors. S. No. Traits $ating #. Approach to'ards s(")ordinates 0. Sharing -no'ledge ;. Participati.e Approach C. Confidence Posed on them B. Comm(nication (nderstood/reached 'ell! F. Ta+ing concern on s(")ordinates G. /n)"iased Approach H. $ole %odel I. Time Planning #A. 3istening S+ill ##. $igid/Fle:i"le #0. 8ood Team 3eader ho' far! 6o( can add as per yo(r re4(irement according to the role played "y the appraisee Total $atings: $emo.e Negati.e )! .al(es separately to "e done "y &$ Department! for disc(ssions and co(nseling. Signat(re: 9f necessaryE other'iseE no need!

Data collected from the s(")ordinate le.el is .ery importantE "(tE at the same timeE it cannot "e ta+en as totally tr(e (nless it is properly s(pported "y data/incidentsE "eca(se of the mat(rity le.el.

III Level of Appraisal: =y lateral le.el &ODs/F(nctional &eads 'here.er the appraisee has cross)f(nctional co) ordination in e:ec(ting the 'or+/Pro2ect! The rating can "e decided "y the indi.id(al cross)f(nctional &ODs or a gro(p of Appraisers depending (pon the %anagement<s decision: Name @ Designations of Appraisers Select the Appraisers to 'hom the Appraisee has contacts or co)ordinates almost fre4(ently. For e:ampleE Prod(ction Chief 'ith JC Chief and %aterials ChiefE or &$ %anager 'ith all &ODsE %aterials Chief 'ith Prod(ction/maintenance/JC/Acco(nts li+e that. $are Coordination need not "e ta+en into consideration. For e:ampleE &$ 'ith Finance %anager or Company Secretary. For this &$ m(st do gro(nd 'or+ in deciding the 8ro(p of Appraisers. Ratings: Definition as given in II Level appraisals. Sl.No. Name of the Traits $ating #. Comm(nication S+ill =e specific on re4(irements! 0. Co)ordination S+ill ;. Sharing Concern 3istening S+ill! C. -no'ledge of Other Department<s 1or+ systems B. Team 3eader F. Presentation S+ill G. Time Planning H. &o(se+eeping I. Ta+ing concern on Organisation De.. #A. Sharing -no'ledge Total Ta+e o(t the negati.e $atings for Co(nseling. S(pport 'ith E.idences at the time of Co(nseling.

Signat(re: Appraiser! Pl Note: !ile Rating" t!e Appraiser m#st $eep in mind as to !o% t!e appraisee&s f#nctions affected t!e performance of ot!er Departments eit!er positive or negative. P#rpose of Ratings is to foc#s to%ards t!e '#alit()S(stems)Proced#res)*mplo(ee Inter+personal Relations.

,. Fo#rt! Level of Appraisal -if re.#ired/ This is the appraisal to "e done "y o(tside Agencies s(ch as C(stomersE 7endorsE DealersE 8o.t. Agencies 'here the concerned employee has more contacts on "ehalf of the Organisation. Traits can "e selected s(ch as C(lt(reE Comm(nicationE Co)ordinationE 3eadership P(nct(alityE SatisfactionE Stress Control and so on. J(alitiesE Time PlanningE

The Appraisal form can "e s(pplied to the indi.id(als in a simple and o"2ecti.e type 'here all re4(ired traits are incorporated. =etter let it "e 0es or No J(estion Type. Sample C(stomer/7endor can "e selected instead of sending the forms to all the contacts. $ating can "e lin+ed at the final stage of ;FA Degree Appraisal appropriately.

B. FIF12 L*3*L 4F APPRAISAL =y the S(perior s! 1hile 8i.ing $atingsE all a"o.e ; or C le.els of $atings m(st "e s("mitted to him "efore he gi.es his $atings. Traits can "e selected accordingly 'hich are "ased more on data. 4(antified!.$atings m(st "e defined in relation to targeted data and achie.ed data. S.No. Traits $ating #. Personality from the .ie' point of Attit(de! 0. Comm(nication from the .ie' point of Presentation! ;. Time Planning C. 7al(e Addition B. &o(se+eeping if needed! F. Team mem"er 3eadership J(alities! G. Organisation/Corporate C(lt(re Practices H. Systems @ Proced(res I. Contin(o(s 9mpro.ement #A. Fit)in ,J(ality policyK ##. Potential #0. Scope for higher le.el 6o( add/delete Traits as per yo(r organi>ation re4(irements. Total

B. FINAL L*3*L 4F APPRAISAL J(antification of $atings! To "e done "y Appraisal Committee represented "y Senior 3e.el %em"ers! Co(nseling to "e done "efore final and a(thentic ratings are incorporated Add: $atings: 3e.el 9E 3e.el 99E 3e.el 999E 3e.el and 3e.el 97. Decide the Traits Accordingly and fit)in the $atings o"tained from a"o.e accordingly. Apply 'eightage accordingly at different le.els. For e:ampleE $ating gi.en on Comm(nication at le.el 0 is C and at le.el C is ;E then deri.es a form(la on 'eightageE "eca(se these 0 le.els are not identical in the sense of %at(rity and -no'ledge. AccordinglyE Care m(st "e ta+en "y the &$ manager in deciding the 'eightage. Final $atings o"tained from all le.els m(st "e lin+ed 'ith the $atings decided for $e'ards s(ch as incrementE merit a'ardE promotionsE TrainingE etc. Pl Note: All Strengths and 1ea+nesses m(st "e informed to the appraisee either thro Co(nseling or 'riting. S(ggest 'ays for 9mpro.ement. 1e ha.e gi.en a sample format and start)(p for designing yo(r o'n ;FA Degree Appraisals. 9nitially ma+e the forms so simple and easily /nderstanda"le. 9n co(rse of timeE do the impro.ement "y e:periences. 9t is good to implement ;FA Degree AppraisalsE "(t only 'ith the interest and in.ol.ement of &$ %anagersE this system can get a s(ccess and s(r.i.alE other'iseE in many organi>ationsE it got failed "eca(se of lac+ of in.ol.ement sho'n "y 3ine %anagers.