Incorporating Comparison within a World-Historical Perspective: An Alternative Comparative Method Author(s): Philip McMichael Source: American Sociological Review,

Vol. 55, No. 3 (Jun., 1990), pp. 385-397 Published by: American Sociological Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2095763 . Accessed: 03/10/2013 11:37
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

American Sociological Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to American Sociological Review.

http://www.jstor.org

This content downloaded from 200.41.82.24 on Thu, 3 Oct 2013 11:37:00 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

INCORPORATING COMPARISON WITHIN A WORLD-HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE: AN ALTERNATIVE COMPARATIVE METHOD

PHILIPMCMICHAEL

Cornell University Recentcritiques of modernization theoryhavequestioned thecomparability of its central organizingconcept,the "nationalsociety." The logic of comparative inquiryrequires independent or independent designsfor uniform"cases"andformal quasi-experimental comparative generalization. Global conceptions of social change violate formal comparative requirements, necessitating an alternative form of "incorporated comparison," that takes both multipleldiachronicand singularlsynchronic forms. is usedto conceptualize Incorporated comparison variationacross timeand space when timeand space dimensions are neitherseparatenor uniform. Thefixed unitsof analysis and world-system employed by modernization theoriesyield to an alternative strategyof groundingthe analyticalunits of comparisonin the world-historical processes under investigation. Recent studies illustrate this alternative to formal comparison and into theprocess of substantive incorporate comparison inquiry. comparativemethod has been under scrutinylately as sociologists attemptto clarify its role in social science. Four authors' assessments of its potential divide into questions of rigorversus interpretivescope. On the side of rigor,Skocpol (1984) andRagin (1987) arguethatthe comparativemethod, when used the with certainlogical strategies,can approach "scientific" rigorof statisticalor variable-based inquiry. On the interpretiveside, Wallerstein (1974) andTilly (1984) arguethatcomparison, of social when it revealsthe interconnectedness phenomena,can advance the cause of historically-groundedsocial theory. Where Skocpol and Ragin are concernedwith the comparative method's formal properties vis-a-vis socialscientificinquiry,WallersteinandTilly wantto employ comparisonto question the positivist' categories inherited from nineteenth-century social theory. While these alternativeconcerns are recognizable in substantiveresearch,they have not been adequately specified in methodological terms.Thereis a lack of fit between extanttaxonomies of comparative-historical research strategiesandrecentcomparativeinquiriesthat eschew the formal comparativemethod. The research strategies ofcomparative-historical fered by Skocpol and Tilly (as representatives of the two alternativeconcerns)display a basic convergence.Whatis missing is a specification "historicalof an alternativenon-experimental researchstrategy.To addressthat comparative" alternative,it is necessary to first evaluate the interpretivechallenge to sociological positivism. The perspectivesof Tilly andWallersteinare similar: Tilly urges the development of "hisand toricallygroundedanalysisof big structures large processes as alternativesto the timeless, placeless models of social organization and social change that came to us with the nineteenth-centuryheritage"(1984, p. 2). Wallererrorof ahisstein contends:"Thefundamental * A version of this paper was presented at the torical social science (including ahistorical 1988 meetings of the AmericanSociological Asso- versions of Marxism) is to reify parts of the ciation. For their constructivesuggestions, I espe- totality into such units and then to compare TerenceK. Hopkins, these reified structures" cially thankWalterGoldfrank, (1974, p. 388). "Sociand FrederickH. Buttel as well as Craig Calhoun, ety," for example, is assumed to be a self-eviHarrietFriedmann,Jess Gilbert, Gary Green, Tsz dent and discrete social unit, and therefore Man Kwong, JosephPark,RichardRubinson,Marcomparable.Both consider such assumptions garet Somers, Dale Tomich, RichardWilliams, and ahistorical, as modem social change is not several anonymousreviewers. I The term"positivist"here designates the appli- simply the propertyof individualsocieties. However, the intellectual goals of Wallermodels to social phecation of natural-science-like nomena. stein and Tilly differ. For Wallerstein, social
AmericanSociological Review, 1990,Vol. 55 (June:385-397) 385

The

This content downloaded from 200.41.82.24 on Thu, 3 Oct 2013 11:37:00 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

386 change can only be understoodas an historical system that operates at a different level from the conventional"nationalsociety." Cross-national comparison must place nations within systemicprocessesoperating atlevels "beneath" and "above"the nation state. The world capitalist system, which includes statesas its essential political components,is the ultimateunit of comparison(1974, p. 390). Tilly, however, is more agnostic, believing that modem social change arises from two distinct, but interconnected, processes of development of the nation-states system on the one hand and the worldwidecapitalistsystemon the other(1984, p. 147). He details various comparativestrategies open to the analyst,including"encompassing comparisons" thatsituatephenomenawithin trans-societal structures (1984, pp. 80-3). Where Wallersteinargues that the modem world system with its "transsocietal structures" has been in existence for the last five centuries,Tilly is content to speculate that encompassing comparison will "come into its own" and secure a place in our "intellectualtoolbox" as we perceive moreclearlythe networksorderingsocial life (1984, p. 147). While cautious about the risks of functionalist explanation in "encompassing comparisons,"2 Tilly neverthelessconcludes:

AMERICANSOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW

ing an all-encompassingworld system. Rather than using "encompassingcomparison"- a strategythatpresumes a "whole"that governs - it progressively its "parts" constructsa whole as a methodologicalprocedureby giving context to historical phenomena. In effect, the "whole" emerges via comparativeanalysis of "parts"as moments in a self-forming whole. I call this incorporatedcomparison. "Incorporated comparison"stems from the critiqueof "modernization theory," andincludes the theoretical proposition that international organizationis continuallyevolving. The goal is not to develop invariant hypothesesvia comparisonof more or less uniform"cases,"but to give substanceto a historicalprocess (a whole) through comparison of its parts. The whole, does not exist independent of its parts. therefore, Whetherconsideringnation-statesor a singular world system, neitherwhole nor partsare permanentcategories or units of analysis. Generalizationis historicallycontingentbecause the units of comparisonare historically specified. In short,comparisonbecomes the substanceof the inquiryratherthanits framework. This essay proceeds from a discussion of extant taxonomies to a critical review of comparative methodology and the challenge of world-system theory to that methodology. It concludes with an illustrationof studies using Encompassing comparisons, however, deserve "incorporated comparison"to develop historimore attention than they have received. Encompassing comparisons have twin advantages: cally-grounded social theory. I characterize directly taking accountof the interconnectedness comparativesociology in ideal-typicaltermsin of ostensibly separateexperiences and providing two senses: (1) by accentuatingthe formal asa strongincentive to groundanalyses explicitly in sumptions governing comparative methodolthe historical contexts of the structures and ogy, and (2) by focusing on macro, cross-naprocesses they include (1984, p. 147). tionalcomparison,since this is the comparative I pursuethe Wallerstein/Tilly path,butrefor- sociology thatWallersteinand Tilly address. mulate the character of that which "encompasses," and distinguish the procedure from CONVERGINGTAXONOMIES:SKOCPOL extant taxonomies of comparativeand histori- AND TILLY cal sociological strategy.An emergentform of "historical-comparative" inquiry parallels the Incorporated comparisonis a researchstrategy rise of world-system theory and blends the not considered in the individual taxonomies mutualconcernsof Wallersteinand Tilly. Sys- developed by Skocpol and Tilly. Table 1 sumtemic phenomenaarecomparedwithoutassum- marizes Skocpol's and Tilly's formulationsof alternative researchagendasandcomparesthem 2 At issue is the question of case independence, with one of my own. Theoreticalgoals are diwhich is a formal requirementof theory testing in vided into the application of theory, such as the comparativemethod. Thus Collins asks of the establishingtheplausibilityof a causalhypotheworld-systemperspective:"Suchconceptions,however, raisea methodologicalproblem:If thereis only sis, and the construction of theory, such as one world system, how can we test a theory? The hypothesis-buildingvia comparative analysis numberof historical instances reduces to one case, linking causes and outcomes across cases. Rebecause everythingis connectedtogether"(1984, p. search goals are divided into formal concerns with the status of causal arguments(i.e., with 341).

This content downloaded from 200.41.82.24 on Thu, 3 Oct 2013 11:37:00 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

COMPARATIVE WORLD-HISTORICAL ANALYSIS

Table 1. Typology of Selected Strategiesfor Comparative Research TheoreticalGoals ResearchGoals Application Construction

387

Skocpol's research strategies for historical sociology

Formal
(Concernwith "stateof knowledge") Applicationof theoretical model to history

2 Comparative-analytic

Substantive
(Concernwith "stateof theworld") Tilly's strategies of comparison Formal (Concernwith "stateof knowledge")

3
Applicationof concept to history

2
Encompassingcomparison (juxtapositionof cases in time and space reveal systemic properties) Comparative-analytic: and Variation-finding Universalizingcomparison (to establishprincipleof variationamong cases)

Substantive (Concernwith "stateof the world")

3
Individualizingcomparison (contrastingcases of a given phenomenonto reveal particularities)

A composite of research strategies for historical sociology Formal (Concernwith "stateof knowledge") 1 Generalizing(use of history to confirmhypotheses) 2 Comparative-analytic (specifies causal regularitiesin varying or convergentoutcomes)

Substantive (Concernwith "stateof the world")

3
Particularizing (conceptualization of an instancevia ideal-typical analysis)

4
Incorporated comparisons(uses comparisonin reconstructing an historicalconfigurationposited as a self-formingwhole)

"thestateof knowledge")and substantiveconcerns with some historicalprocess or situation (i.e., with "the state of the world"). These researchstrategiescan be understood as a set of "moments"in the researchprocess, that may presuppose one another - for example, a focus on the statusof a formal theory may depend on prior theory constructionvia comparative-analyticanalysis. On the other hand,they can be understoodas relatively distinct research emphases. In the top panel, Skocpol's three "researchstrategiesin historical sociology" can be classified schematically as: the applicationof a general theory to explain historical phenomena (box 1); the con-

structionof a theoryof causalregularitiesusing methods (box 2); formal comparative-analytic and the use of a key concept or set of concepts in historicalanalysis to meaningfullyelaborate phenomenon,whethera case study a particular or informalcomparison(box 3). This is a typology of strategies;as Skocpol claims they are and sealed from one another" not "hermetically "creative combinations are and always have been practical" (1984,p. 362). An implicitfourth strategy(box 4), constructinga theoreticalaccount of a recurringor complex historicalconfiguration,is not addressedby Skocpol. Skocpol's research strategies for historical sociology are quite compatible typologically

This content downloaded from 200.41.82.24 on Thu, 3 Oct 2013 11:37:00 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

388 with the more focused comparativestrategies proposedby Tilly (middle panel of Table 1). I argue that Tilly's four strategies of comparison: individualizing - contrasting "specific instancesof a given phenomenonas a means of graspingthe peculiaritiesof each case" (1984, p. 82), universalizing, variation-finding,and encompassingcan be reducedto three distinct forms of inquiry. Universalizing comparison establishing"thatevery instance of a phenomenon follows essentially the same rule"; and variation-finding comparison- establishing "a principleof variationin the characteror intensity of a phenomenonby examining systematicdifferencesamonginstances"(1984, p. 82), are in fact alternativeforms of comparative-analyticprocedure.Both Skocpol, in assoof comparative ciatingthe strength analysiswith a combinationof Mill's "methodof agreement" and"methodof difference"(1984, pp. 378-80), and Ragin, in building what he refers to as a "synthetic" comparative strategy(1987, pp. 824), indirectlyendorsesuch a classification.This comparative-analytic type fits in box 2. "Encompassing comparison," a strategy employing a systemic ideal-type to explain variation amongcases "asconsequencesof their relationshipsto the whole" (Tilly 1984,p. 125), is placedin box 1. Tilly's depictionof Rokkan's "conceptual maps"andhis claim thatthey "lack dynamism" (1984,p. 139)suggest thatthis strategy is an applicationof a theoreticalmodel to is placed history."Individualizing comparison" in box 3 since the emphasis is on particularizing a phenomenon via informal comparison. Tilly's taxonomyalso leaves box 4 empty. In the bottom panel of Table 1 I present a composite typology that combines the ideas of Skocpol and Tilly. Most important,I consider the meaningof the logical cell (box 4) thatneither Skocpol or Tilly address.This cell represents an interpretive approach,focusing on the constructionof causal historicalanalysis without recourse to formal methodological proceduresor a formaltheory. A typology of strategiesdoes not mean there is no relation among the types. For instance, some analystsmight see a sequence among the strategieswhere the missing strategyperforms a "groundbreaking" role. Thus, box 4 might inform a comparative-analytic constructionof hypotheses from additionalcases (box 2), or a generalizingtheory (box 1), or a more specific to be elaboratedin a particuconceptualization lar instance (box 3). Relations among the vari-

AMERICANSOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW ous strategies may be sequential, supplemenI arguefor the relative tary,or complementary. autonomyof the strategies,especially as I see "incorporated comparison" as ananalytical strategy in which theoryconstructionis historically specific. Eachstrategy pursuesa particular level of analysis governing the scope of the data addressedandthe claims of the research.In that sense, each strategyhas its own researchfocus. ENCOMPASSINGCOMPARISONOR INCORPORATED COMPARISON? It is particularlyimportantto distinguish "infrom"encompassing" corporated" comparison. Tilly defines "encompassingcomparisons"as comparisons that "select locations within [a or process andexplain similarilarge] structure ties or differences among those locations as of theirrelationships to the whole" consequences (1984, p. 123). Wallersteinidentifiesthe "large structure or process"as the modem world system: "an alternativemodel with which to engage in comparativeanalysis, one rootedin the historicallyspecific totality which is the world capitalisteconomy." He continues: "We hope to demonstratethereby that to be historically specific is not to fail to be analyticallyuniversal" (1974, p. 391). Demonstratingthe existence of the system as an historicalentity leads him to employ an "illustrative" method of comparison using a single entity (as distinct from conventional "analytic"comparison of multipleentities),which producesfunctionalist history (Bonnell 1980, p. 165). Tilly likewise observesthat"encompassing risk comparisons" the danger of functionalistexplanationwhere the whole determinesbehaviorof the partsand he concludes: "Lovers of risk should try encompassingcomparisons"(1984, p. 124). The risk, it seems to me, is not in employing a global perspective in which comparison is among components of a larger entity, but in how that perspective is constructed.If we begin, as Tilly suggests, with "a mental map of the whole system and a theoryof its operation" (1984, p. 125), then we are likely to proceed with an uncontestedunit of analysis. Tilly argues thatthe map andtheoryarebest left provisional, so thatthey "will improvein use"(1984, p. 125). Nevertheless, the procedureputs the development of historically-groundedsocial theoryat risk by presuminga systemic unit and unit cases within which historical observation takes place. This is common to formal com-

This content downloaded from 200.41.82.24 on Thu, 3 Oct 2013 11:37:00 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

ANALYSIS WORLD-HISTORICAL COMPARATIVE whichpresuppose procedures, parative-analytic "casesas wholes, andthey comparewhole cases with each other" (Ragin 1987, p. 3). Preconceptions about cases as analytical units constraininvestigationby shaping conceptualization of causal regularitiesinferredfrom common patternsacross "cases."In eithermode of comparison,the analystmust assumethatcommon patterningderives from intrinsicproperties of either "unit-cases"or the global system encompassing"cases." Use of preconceived units is an overriding principle of analytic compari"experimental" son (e.g., Przeworskiand Teune 1970). It removes the unit of analysis from theoretical contention and limits the scope and possibilities of historicalexplanation.As a result,comparativeinquirytends to be constructedaround an "external" relationshipbetween "cases"and areabstracted or "wholes" theory,where"cases" from theirtime/place setting. As an alternative to comparing discrete "cases"to mediatethe (presumed)poles of "the the analyst can general"and "the particular," use "incorporated comparison"in which interrelatedinstancesare integralto, and define, the generalhistoricalprocess. Put anotherway, the particulars directly realize the general (c.f. Moore1958,p. 151), which cannotbe abstracted as a formaltheory. stratcomparison" research The"incorporated egy can take two forms. The first is a multiple form, in which instancesare analyzedas products of a continuouslyevolving process in and across time.An example might be the development of the state system as an emerging configurationof states interrelatedalong several bothcontextual(capitalist,or milidimensions-, tary-industrial epochs) and compositional (economic hierarchy,geo-political relations). Here,comparisonreveals andposits a systemic process throughthe juxtapositionof instances in time. The second is a singular form, analyzing variation in or across space within a worldhistorical conjuncture. This is a "cross-sectional"comparisonof segmentsof a contradictory whole in which the segments (e.g., social units, cultures,or belief systems) "belong"to distinctsocial times. They arecomparableprecisely becausetheyarecompetitivelycombined, and thereforeredefined, in an historical conjuncture with unpredictable outcomes. Examples of such overlappingsegments are historical combinations of peasant and market

389

economies, slave and wage labor systems, metropolitan and colonial cultures, etc. The comparativejuxtaposition of these segments dynamics(along part/ reveals the contradictory part and part/whole dimensions) that provide theirhistoricaltextureand that of the whole. The fact thatthe firstform has a generalizing thrust and the second form a particularizing thrustdoes not rule out combinationswherethe particularand the general mutually condition one another.The strategic division lies in the relative emphases on space and time coordinates in the analysis of historical configuratherole reformulates tions. Overall,this strategy it to a substantive of comparison,subordinating historical problem. Comparison becomes an "internal"rather than an "external"(formal) featureof inquiry,relatingapparentlyseparate processes (in time and/orspace) as components of a broader,world-historicalprocess or conjuncture.In short, this strategy seeks to avoid the formalconstructionof units of comparative analysis central to the comparative analytic method. LIMITSOF THE COMPARATIVEANALYTIC METHOD In comparative analytic inquiry, theory and concepts can only approach "generality"by units.The juxtaposingtwo or more "particular" goal is to find invarianceby analyzing several "cases"(RaginandZaret1983, configurational p. 744). In cross-nationalcomparison,for example, this appearsin the procedureof juxtaposing national societies assumed to be unrelated in time and space. This assumptionderives from evolutionarytheory (Bock 1956, p. 90), in which national societies are self-contained systems with common ontogenetic patterns. In this theory, the "national society" emerged in the nineteenth century as a comparativeconstruct,distinguishedcategorically from traditional societies in an evolutionary to the sequence. Nisbet writes: "Fundamental ComparativeMethod and its assumed validity as a body of evidence are the very preconceptions - conclusions, too, actually - of the theoryof social evolutionthatthe Comparative Method purportedlyverifies" (1969, p. 190). Such premises formalize the comparative method in so far as the idea of evolving national societies (each independently replicating a common systemic process) fulfills the criterion of uniformityof unit cases (Zelditch 1973,

This content downloaded from 200.41.82.24 on Thu, 3 Oct 2013 11:37:00 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

390 p. 282). In principle, it allows indiscriminate cross-nationalcomparison.3 More important,the notion of separate,holistic national societies encourages comparative abstraction.Zelditch claims: "Thatgeneralization requires abstractionfollows simply fromthe uniquenessof wholes"(1973, pp. 2789). But this assumes uniqueculturalconfigurationsin societiesunconnected in time andspace. It eliminatesthe possibility of a differentorder of generalization- an inverse procedurethat would posit the distinctivenessof modem culturalconfigurationsas productsandcreatorsof a connective historicalprocess (see Robertson and Lechner 1985). But to posit historical distinctiveness is a contradictionin terms if the unit of analysis correspondsto the unit of historical variance. One solution is to employ a unit of analysis that is not the nationalsociety, as world-systemtheory has done, by declaring that nation-statesare partial institutions of a broader,singular,global economy (Wallerstein 1983, p. 133). The frameof referencefor social change becomes a global unit of analysis.Thus Bach claims: "Long-heldstrategiesof concept formation and comparativeanalysis are challenged by the insistence upon singular processes as the starting point for inquiry...." (1980, p. 297).

AMERICANSOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW the state, or nation, or people" - the world economy "within which there is an ongoing division of labor" becomes the site of social change (Wallerstein1983, p. 155). But the shift in levels of analysis is not simply an enlargement of view. The world system is not merely the site of social change, it is more the fundamental source of social change.One statement of this perspectiveis the following conceptualizationof the stateas neithera universal nor a discretecategory:
Stateness ... is not a generic categoryof political life - whose variedforms areto be tracedwithin and across civilizations - but an historically specific category,one distinctiveto therelationally formedjurisdictions-the sovereignties-of the interstatesystem. It (initially) European-centered is a category conceptually given by, because factually imposed by, the developmentprocesses of the capitalist world-economy (Hopkins and Wallerstein1981, p. 245).

In positing the encompassing world system as the unit of analysis, the theory reformulates the conventionalbalancingact between generality and particularity.Analytic comparison takes historical diversity as a given and forto produce mally juxtaposes such particularity general concepts. However, the world-system epistemological perspective offers alternativeassumptions:(1) that we are dealing in social categories of an integratedmodem world, and WORLD-SYSTEMTHEORY'S therefore (2) that they are not discrete, so the CHALLENGEAND LIMITS particular expresses the general. Consider Wallerstein's account of incorpoWorld-systemtheory's epistemological interventionconcernedthe specificationof the arena rationof the Indiansubcontinent,the Ottoman of social action.4The shift was from the na- empire, the Russian empire, and West Africa tional society as a self-evident unit of analysis into the world system. He employs an "encomto the world economy as an historical social passing comparison"of the four more or less unitsimultaneous processes where each "process system. Insteadof the "politico-cultural derived ... from the need of the world-econI Uniformity of units is a theoretical requireomy to expand its boundaries,a need which ment it does not mean that all existing (national) societies fulfill this criterion. According to was itself the outcome of pressuresinternalto (Wallerstein1989, p. 129). Zelditch,"intelligiblecomparisons" demandthatthe the world-economy" methodological rules be complemented with sub- Determiningthe point, or event, of "incorporastantiveknowledge of the societies underinvestiga- tion" in which "some significant production tion to produce relevant comparison.This includes processes in a given geographic location beallowing "unique" transnational or case-specific come integral to various of the commodity processes to guide selection of cases (Elder 1976, p. chains that constitute the ongoing divisioning 213; Ragin 1981, p. 114; and see Skocpol 1979, of labor of the capitalist world-economy"inchapter1). It also includesWeber'sideal-type(1949, volves identifyingresponses"tothe ever-changp. 93), which mediatestheory and historybecause it is distilled from historyand yet is createdaccording to some criterionof rationalitynot historicallygiven (see Kocka 1985, p. 141). 4 The epistemological shift is a substantiverevision of Parsons'snotion of a social system of societies (Parsons1973, p. 107), which qualifiedthe original evolutionist premise of national societies as social systems. While Parsons's notion derived from societies themselves, Wallersteinis skepticalof the utility of the concept of "society."

This content downloaded from 200.41.82.24 on Thu, 3 Oct 2013 11:37:00 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

ANALYSIS WORLD-HISTORICAL COMPARATIVE ing 'marketconditions' of this world-economy (whateverthe sourceof these changes)in terms of efforts by those who control these producof tion processesto maximizethe accumulation capital within this market"(Wallerstein 1989, p. 130). In concreteterms, in each instancethe spatialspecializa"emergenceof a three-tiered tion withina zone 'export'cash crops, 'local market' food crops, and 'crops' of migrant workers- has been a telltale sign of incorporation"(Wallerstein1989, p. 138). In world-systemtheory,social concepts canfrom their place/time dimennot be abstracted sions as they can in formalcomparison. conditions similar seemingly To focuson certain those to abstract times; placesatvarious invarious andto settings; fromtheirplace-time conditions orconsequences intothecauses abstractly, inquire, intheone is to proceed precisely of theconditions outof court by theworld-system ruled wayclearly on socialchange perspective or world-historical 1978,p. 212). (Hopkins Fromthis perspective,comparativegeneralization loses its point: "It is the a priori elimination of eachcase's distinctivenessthatthe world system's approachrules out, not the claim that there are comparabilities or similarities" (Hopkins 1978, p. 213). The differenceis twofold: (1) in conventionalcomparison,the units are themselves analytical points of departure, units whereasin world-systemstudies they areof observationof systemic processes (analytically defined); and (2) generalizationfrom the comparativeoperation is intended to be substantiveratherthan logical. World-systemtheory's limits lie in its formalism.Like formalcomparison,it presumesa whole, an historical system "whose future is inscribed in its conception" (Howe and Sica of the system is 1980, p. 255). The determinacy both conceptualand real - an all-encompassing worldwide division of labor. Wallerstein writes: "My own unit of analysis is based on the measurablesocial reality of interdependent productionactivities, what may be called an 'effective social division of labor' or, in code language,an 'economy"'(1979, p. 270). Inother words, the unit of analysis is equated with the object of analysis (Friedmann1980). This is the centralambiguity.By mergingthe concept of the world-system (as a distributional mechanismin lieu of a single political center, qua ideal type) with its empirical scope, the world-systemperspectivehas no choice but to prefigurehistory. COMPARISON INCORPORATED

391

to a preconceivedconcretetotalAn alternative to the whole ity in which partsaresubordinated is the idea of an emergenttotalitysuggestedby comparison."Here totality is a "incorporated conceptualprocedure, ratherthan an empirical or conceptual premise. It is an imminent ratherthan a primafacie propertyin which the whole is discovered through analysis of the mutualconditioningof parts.A conception of totalityin which parts(as relationalcategories) revealandrealizethe changingwhole (cf. Green and Fairweather1984) overcomes the rigidity of world-system theory and builds on its insights. In constructinga holistic interpretation of an historical process, the unit of analysis the empiricalwhole. neednot be simultaneously As a method of inquiry, a world-historical perspectiveconceptualizes "instances"as dismoments of a sintinct mutually-conditioning gular phenomenon posited as a self-forming whole.6It is concernedwith reducingthe "exrelationbetweentheoryand ternal" oppositional history - an oppositionembeddedin generalizing strategiesand the use of a priori units of relaanalysis - and promotingan "internal" tion between theory and history.7It is an alterI This parallels Marx's historical method of developing concrete concepts in which a social category is conceptualizedas "arichtotalityof manydeandrelations"(Marx 1973, p. 100). For terminations example, the concept of "wage labor"(as a component of the "capital"relation)was not an empirical concept - wage laborwas not prevalentat the time nor a singularrelation.It presupposeda long history involving disof social and political transformation of a world andconstruction possession of peasantries market- both of which were decisive and related of the emergenceof capital.The manypreconditions of the concept of "wage labor" sided determinations concretizedit historicallyat the same time as it was used in Marx's theoretical schema as an abstract analyticaldevice. The goal of Marx's method is to give historical context to the empirical problem at hand, i.e., to concretize it as a phenomenonin time and space (see Sayer 1987). 6The term"self-formingwhole" refersto the dialectial conceptionof totality in which "the partsnot both among only internallyinteractandinterconnect themselves and with the whole, but also that the whole cannotbe petrifiedin an abstractionsuperior of its to the facts, becauseprecisely in the interaction partsdoes the wholeform itself as a whole" (Kosik, 1976, p. 23). 7 Developing an "internal relationbetween theory and history"refers to the conceptualizationof his-

This content downloaded from 200.41.82.24 on Thu, 3 Oct 2013 11:37:00 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

392 nativeperspectivebecauseit views comparable social phenomena as differentiatedoutcomes or momentsof an historicallyintegratedprocess, whereas conventional comparison treats such social phenomenaas parallel cases. The distinctionlies in the initial conceptualization of the coordinatesof the inquiry,which is the point of the formal/substantivedistinction of researchgoals in Table 1, and which can now for the two forms of incorporated be illustrated comparison. The multiple form of incorporatedcomparison. The multiple form of incorporatedcomparisonanalyzes a cumulativeprocess through time- and space-differentiated instances of an historically singular process. Barrington Moore's (1967) Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy informs, but does not adequately exemplify, this comparativeperspective. Moore's alternative "modernizing" routes/ ideal types (democracy,fascism, and communism) arepoliticalphasesof a combinedworldhistoricalprocess of modernization.

REVIEW AMERICANSOCIOLOGICAL

context, realizing Veblen's insight concretely, Moore representsthe transnationalextension of commodity relations as "the commercial impulse," a quite abstractideal-type. Furthermore, such causal generalityproduces a comparative design that rules out any cumulative interaction between the states concerned (Johnson 1980, p.51). Their individual modernizing phases/sequences are so varied in processual and chronological terms that an implicit world-historicalsequence is quite indeterminate. A better example of the multiple form is Walton's study, Reluctant Rebels (1984). It redefinesthe theoreticalfield of studiesof revorevolts"with a lutionby reconceiving"national global dimensionratherthansimply as discrete nationalevents with common conditions. Juxtaposing the Huk rebellion in the Philippines, the Mau Mau revolt in Kenya, and Colombia's La Violencia, Walton characterizes them as thatbegan struggles partsof continuous "integral to take on definable features at the turnof the definite ones by the 1920s) in rethesethree Toa verylimited extent types. . . may century(and andchoices. alternative routes constitute Theyare sponse to the socioeconomic inequalities and muchmoreclearlysuccessivehistorical stages. dislocations producedby the incorporationof a limited determinate relation local and largely precapitalistsocieties into the As suchtheydisplay to each other.The methodsof modernization global economy" (Walton 1984, p. 169). In of effect, Waltonaddressesrelated,parallelevents chosenin one country changethe dimension who takethe in the evolution of the state system as an ongothe problem for the nextcountries whenhe coinedthe ing, general process manifested in particular step, as Veblenrecognized now fashionable term, 'the advantages of nationalsettings (althoughthe feedback effect backwardness' (Moore 1967,pp.413-14). of the instances on the general process is disMoore's notion of determinacy,the general- counted, perhapsbecause of the state-building izing medium, is quite abstract.It is, in fact, focus). of "national revolts" Walton'sreformulation close to a moral vision "of the tidal flow of history, a flow that encompasses crucial pas- directly addresses the world-historicaldimensages of violent change in a numberof socie- sion, employing a theory of internationalpatties" as "the unique history of humankind" terning over time. His study responds to (Smith 1984, p. 333). As such, it poses no theo- Skocpol's States and Social Revolutions by retical problem of determinacy,evidenced in broadeningher "exacting"definitionof "social his choice of analyticalcategories and the re- revolution"to include more recent and more searchdesign. In a study thatpotentiallycould limited rebellions within a broader epochal place national cases within a world market definition. He concludes: "In the historical processof capitalistrevolutionthatbegins with tory from the formativerelationsamong the facts at the classical Europeaninstances, national rehand. It is a dialecticalprocedurein which "logical investigationindicateswherehistoricalinvestigation a process of abstractionin which the analystmoves begins, and that in turn complements and presup- back andforthbetween partsand whole, developing and poses the logical" (Kosik 1976, p. 29). This refersto the complexity and form of their interrelations, the distinctionbetween the method of investigation in so doing concretizing both. Thus, an "historical and the method of exposition in which "that with fact is in a sense not only the prerequisite for which science initiates its exposition is alreadythe investigation but is also its result"(Kosik 1976, p. (Kosik 1976, p. 16), i.e., the theo- 25). In the process of conceptualization,facts beresultof research" reticalprocessingof data derivingfrom phenomena come historically concrete by locating them in a Theoryis complex and dynamiccontext. recognizedto be dynamicallyinterrelated.

This content downloaded from 200.41.82.24 on Thu, 3 Oct 2013 11:37:00 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

ANALYSIS WORLD-HISTORICAL COMPARATIVE volts are another stage that now shades into new forms that emerge with the international political economy of late capitalism"(Walton 1984,pp.207-8). Thedifferenceis thatWalton's strategylocates revolts in a cumucomparative lative historical context, whereas Skocpol's strategyclassifies the threeclassic comparative revolutions(France,Russia, and China)by isolating theircommon configurativepatterns(cf. Burawoy1989). contexts" that imSkocpol's "transnational pinge on the three state organizationsremain relatively abstract,conceived as "modernization" pressures(Skocpol 1979, p. 286). Mainof statesandthe world tainingthe irreducibility marketis undoubtedlya theoreticalchoice, but it also coincides with the formal conditions of the comparativemethod, which "assumesthat the contingentelements observedas partof the phenomenaare the same over time and space" (Bach 1980, p. 302). The comparativemethod specifiesthe sufficientandnecessaryconditions for socially-transformingrevolutions, but in doing so the states in questionare comparedas cases with common conditions and destinies state).In modernbureaucratic (the prototypical other words, comparative logic produces a and as historically conceptionof state-formation theoreticallyunaffectedby the changingorganizational principles and structureof the world economy (cf. McMichael 1987a). In short, conventionalcomparativedesign discountsthe world-historicalsignificance of modern social revolutions. Arguing that "our interest centers more on nationalrevoltsthanon classifyunderstanding ing them"(Walton 1984, p. 175), Walton emform of generalizationthat ploys an alternative from cases but emerges as an is not abstracted generalizationspecifying historically-situated forms of "capirevolts"as particular "national dependspretalist revolution."Generalization locating anddiffercisely upon simultaneously entiatingthe revolts. Walton offers a formula for "incorporatedcomparison" in which he maintainsthat"themost fertile avenue toward greaterrefinementlies not with the conceptual universesbutalongthe same premiseof separate roadof continuitymarkedby differencesassosituciatedwith the natureof the revolutionary andworldsystemimpact" ation,class structure, (Walton 1984, p. 188). Another example of the multiple form of "incorporated comparison" is Anderson's (1974) Lineages of the AbsolutistState, which

393

investigates the phenomenonof absolutismas an historical interludebetween the feudal and capitalistepochs. Absolutism was not a singular occurrence:
... the storyof Absolutismhas many,overlapping beginnings and separate, staggered endings. Its underlyingunity is real andprofound,but it is not thatof a linearcontinuum.... The firstbourgeois revolutions occurred long before the last metamorphosesof Absolutism, chronologically (Anderson 1974, p. 10).

In spite of this, Andersonhas a conceptionof absolutismthat he develops througha combinationof theoreticalandhistoricalanalysis.He states: "The aim of this study is to examine EuropeanAbsolutism simultaneously'in genthat is to say, both the eral' and 'in particular': of the AbsolutistState, which 'pure' structures constitute it as a fundamentalhistorical category, and the 'impure' variantspresented by the specific and diverse monarchies of postmedieval Europe"(Anderson1974, p. 7). Thus absolutism,seen as a politicized form of class rule by the European aristocracy, obtained guises. Europein various"national" throughout At the same time, absolutism was intrinsiAbsolutist states shared cally world-historical. power via processes (of recoveryof aristocratic political centralization)precisely because they fortheir settingresponsible a relational inhabited (as opposed to creation as territorially-based dynastically-based)regimes in the first place. In these terms, state-buildingwas an internavariantsshaped tional process, with "national" by this setting. The singularform of incorporatedcomparicomson. The singularform of "incorporated parison"analyzes variationin or across space at an historicalconjuncture.It differs from the multipleform in thatit focuses on the multilayered characterof a social configurationrather than on its replicationacross time. Within the world-historical frame of reference,the singuthrust, whereas lar form has a particularizing thrust. They themultipleformhas a generalizing share the goal of historical specificity, but the formerfocuses on a cross-sectionalanalysis in time (e.g., the conjuncture),whereas the latter focuses on process throughtime (e.g., the era). These foci are not mutually exclusive and a combinationis both feasible and enhancing. Perhaps the best example is Polanyi's The Great Transformation(1957) which employs both forms of incorporatedcomparisonin its overall critique of the ideology of economic

This content downloaded from 200.41.82.24 on Thu, 3 Oct 2013 11:37:00 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

394 liberalism.Polanyi reconstructsthe nineteenth in which conjuncture centuryas a contradictory social and reorganizes market the self-regulating political life - from the labormarket,through econthe interstatesystem, to the international omy. Here the comparisonof the substantivist (pre-capitalist)conception with the utilitarian conception of "economy"frames the critique and explains the countermovements to the marketsystem. On the otherhand,Polanyi identifies the insystemwith of the nation-state stitutionalization the imposition of the gold standard(although he discounts Britain's hegemonic role). He views the era as one in which the self-regulat(as instituing mechanismof the gold standard tional anchor of world commodity markets) subordinated nationaleconomic policy to currency stability.This was achieved throughthe institutionalframeworkof economic (central banking) and political (constitutionalism)ac-both key elementsof state-buildcountability ing. The goal of currencystabilityforced state managersto internalizethe exigencies of world which in turn tradethrough priorities, budgetary affected domesticpolitics, generatingcountermovementsto marketdiscipline.The varietyof nationalpoliticalresponsesto the impactof the providesa marketandits politicalmanagement comparativeaccount of the social contention state-buildin theprocessof European generated ing. In sum, Polanyi's work combines both forms of comparisonin analyzingthe periodof economic liberalism as both a contradictory conjunctureand a harbingerof political reaction leading to the greattransformation. The singularform of "incorporated comparison" is also exemplified in the work of Friedmann. Challengingworld-systemtheory functionalism in which "themarketand the hierarchy of nations are coterminous"(Friedmann 1980, p. 248), she conceptualizesinternational in termsof "threemutuallydependstructuring ent but analyticallydistinct factors: state/state economicprocesses,and relations,transnational class or sectoralrelationswithinnations" (Friedmann 1982, p. S253).8 In her account of the

AMERICANSOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW world wheat marketbetween 1873-1935, she argues that capitalistproductionof wheat was displaced by household production through conjuncturalmechanisms in the world economy, including changing technologies of production and circulation and the role of New in securingfrontierlands. Worldstate-building "Specialized (household) commodity production" on the U.S. plains successfully rivalled British "capitalistproduction"in what otherwise was an era of capitalist expansion based on the new social importanceof wage labor (both in terms of productionand wage-goods consumption). Proceedingwithin a world-economicframework, defined empirically as a world market "in which one price confrontedproducerseverywhere,"Friedmannemploys a comparative analysis that simultaneouslydistinguishesand relates the producing regions conceptually (Friedmann1978 p. 546). The relationshipbetween the Europeancapitalistproducerand the New World commodity produceris mediated by price movements, and the outcomes of this relationshipcrystallize in and throughthe national political economy. The whole emerges throughthe action of its parts, namely, processes of class formation "with origins in the world economy, but a location and political expression within nationaleconomies" (Friedmann 1982, p. S255). Friedmann'sstudy of the post-WorldWarII international food regime9 follows a similar logic of inquiry in which the conjunctureis explicitly defined as a political structuringof the internationalfood order via "complementary national policies." She examines two momentsof the postwarfood order:the immeaxis was diatepostwarregimewhose "principle food aid from the United States to formerly self-sufficient agrarian societies" (1982, p.

world marketrelations(includingrivalrywith Britain), and regional plantationrelations. Each set of relationships was a necessary, but not sufficient, condition of the characterof slave production.The principlerelationship- of slaves to masters- actively realized these contextualconstraintsand ulti8 This kind of fluid multilayeredanalysiscaptures mately shaped them as an interactionof place in the interconnections in motion, exemplified in world time. 9 For a furtherdevelopmentof the concept of the Tomich's (1990) account of the decline of plantation slavery in the French colony of Martinique. food regimein which the historicaldynamicbetween and the nation-statetranscends Tomich employs several analytic levels as interre- capitalistagriculture of modem slavery.Thus, slave the economic coherence of the state (compelling a lated determinations labordynamicsin the Frenchcolonies stemmedfrom rethinkingof analytical units), see Friedmannand the interactionbetween the Frenchcolonial system, McMichael (1989).

This content downloaded from 200.41.82.24 on Thu, 3 Oct 2013 11:37:00 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

ANALYSIS COMPARATIVE WORLD-HISTORICAL S248), and the decomposition of this order during the 1970s into a more market-oriented by higherfood prices.The regimecharacterized "worldeconomy" is conceptualizedas the interactionof nationalpolitical economy and internationalprice relations - the latter being divi,concreteexpressions of the international sion of labor and "the immediatesignals guiding and constrainingstates, enterprisesand individuals"(Friedmann 1982,p. S254). Within the singular form of "incorporated multilayeredanalysis can be spacomparison," tial or temporal.In my researchon settleragroexportsystems, I have triedto link both dimensions in establishing the parametersof social change. Accounts of Australianwool-growing (McMichael 1984) and the ante-bellumcotton culture(McMichael1987b, 1988, forthcoming) are framedin termsof the reorganizingspatial and ideological currentsof the nineteenthcentury world economy. Spatially, the transition from mercantileto industrialcapitalism set a trade- and price-unifiedworld market against politically-regulated markets of the various colonial systems. The reorganizationof London-centeredcommercial financing, sponsoring new needs for global inputs and markets, spun a web of commercialcredit and competiOn each tive relationsaroundstapleproduction. frontier,commercially-specializedand migratory growers proliferated,challenging the sopartriarchal grazier cial orderof the traditional andplanterclasses. These challenges informed a temporaldisjuncturebetween residualtraditional-mercantilistand emergent liberal-commercialconceptionsof local politicaleconomy, shapingthe midcenturypolitical strugglesover land andlaborsystems in each polity. In worldhistorical terms, they consolidated a global wage-laborregime. Roseberry(1982) extends this conception of a global wage-laborregime to modernpeasantries, which he argues bear little relationto the classic Europeanpeasantry (see also Llambi 1988). His analysis of Venezuelan coffee producers as productsof the uneven development of world capitalismmediatedby state and producer politics leads him to reconceptualize as a globalprocess that is "proletarianization" heterogeneous and contingent, producing "a varietyof forms of laborrelations"(Roseberry 1982, p. 206). Methodologically, Roseberry reconstructsthe peasantconcept in world-historicalterms in orderto move "beyondthe typological exercise by which peasants are rei-

395

fied as a categoryamong variousothercategories," claiming that "reference to history as involves an attemptto grasp proletarianization a totality"(1982, p. 204). is an attemptto Commonto these approaches reconstructthe history of the capitalist world economy as a complex unity of social relationships anchored in wage labor and linked by exchange relations, in which wage labor and labor otherformsof nonwage,value-producing coexist in time and space (see McMichael and Buttel 1990).This theoreticalperspectivelends itself to the methodology of "incorporated comparison":blending theory and history in such a way to avoid abstractindividuality(e.g., perceivingwage, slave, or peasantlaborin isolation), and abstractgenerality (e.g., a world commodityproducmarketof undifferentiated ers). The point is to try to perceive the unity in diversity without reifying either. Insofar as incorporatedcomparison works with units of analysisspecified in time andplace, it enhances this goal. the possibility of approaching CONCLUSION variation analysiscapture How can comparative across time and space when time and space are from the not uniformand cannot be abstracted constructionof analyticalunits and categories? Underwhatconditionscan comparisonbe used to reconstructchanging social relationsin and of time and space?I arguethereis a strategyfor researchthatreforworld-historically-oriented it to the mulates comparisonby subordinating development of historically-groundedtheory ratherthan using it to establish a causal logic that is generalizable outside time and space relations. In other words, where general (connective/cumulative) processes of the modem world are organized by time and place, comparison of time and place occurrencesreveals continuitiesandatthe sametime attachesworldhistoricalmeaning to those occurrences. Neither conventional comparativemethods based on modernizationtheory's assumptions of relatively uniform and discrete national societies nor a theory of a permanentworld-systemic structure adequatelyaccomplishthis. The point is to avoid "imperfect empiricism" (Spencer 1987) in which units of analysis are reified as self-evident or fixed entities. However, we can adapt the world-systemperspective of a theoreticallysingular,yet historically methdiverse,globalprocessas an approximate

This content downloaded from 200.41.82.24 on Thu, 3 Oct 2013 11:37:00 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

396 odological principle. This resembles Laslett's (1980) inversion of the conventionalinductive procedure,which generalizes outcomes from multiplecases. She proposes applyinga theory of generalcauses to the analysis of "instances" processes in orderto relatetheoretically-general to historically-particular outcomes(cf. Hopkins and Wallerstein 1981), demonstratingthat in history there are divergentmanifestationsof a singular process (e.g., market expansion, nationalrevolt).Outcomes(as instances)may appear individuallyas self-evidentunitsof analyprocesses. sis, but in reality are interconnected problemBreakingout of the "modernization atic" is a first step,10 graspingworld-historical contingency is the next. I have tried to show that this can be addressedwith a multiple or a comparison." singular form of "incorporated The multipleform of comparisonaddressesthe problem of independentunits by focusing on continuityacross time, while the singularform avoids the all-encompassingunit by inverting the part/wholerelation.However, it is not the form that mattersso much as the intent - to develop historically-grounded social theory throughthe comparativejuxtapositionof elements of a dynamic,self-formingwhole.

REVIEW AMERICANSOCIOLOGICAL
Bonnell, Victoria E. 1980. "The Uses of Theory, Concepts and Comparison in Historical Sociology." ComparativeStudies in Society and History 22:156-73. Burawoy, Michael. 1989. "Two Methods in Search of Science: Skocpol versus Trotsky."Theoryand Society 18:759-805. Collins, Randall. 1984. "StatisticsVersus Words." Pp. 329-62 in Sociological Theory, edited by RandallCollins. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass. Cross-National Elder,JosephW. 1976."Comparative Methodology."Pp. 209-30 in Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 2, edited by Alex Inkeles. Palo Alto, CA: AnnualReviews Inc. Harriet.1978. "WorldMarket,State,and Friedmann, Family Farm:Social Bases of HouseholdProduction in the Era of Wage Labor." Comparative Studies in Society and History 20:545-86.
. 1980. "Review of The Capitalist World-

Economy, by ImmannuelWallerstein."Contemporary Sociology 9:246-49.

. 1982. "The Political Economy of Food:

The Rise and Fall of the Postwar International Food Order." AmericanJournal of Sociology 88 (Supplement):S248-86. Friedmann, Harriet and Philip McMichael. 1989. and the State System: The Rise and "Agriculture Decline of National Agricultures, 1870 to the Present."Sociologia Ruralis 29:93-117. Green, Gary P. and John R. Fairweather. 1984. "Agricultural Production and Capitalism: The PHILIP MCMICHAEL is Associate Professor of Rural SocioloandExpressiveOrientations." Structured Sociology at Cornell University.He has conducted gia Ruralis 24:149-56. research on settler agrarian systems in Australia Hopkins, Terence K. 1978. "World-SystemAnalyand the UnitedStatesin the nineteenthcenturyworld sis: Methodological Issues." Pp. 199-218 in Soeconomy, and is now working on the current cial Change in the Capitalist World Economy, of states and agroprocesses of internationalization edited by BarbaraHockey Kaplan.Beverly Hills: food systems. Sage. Hopkins, Terence K., and Immanuel Wallerstein. of the WorldTransformations 1981. "Structural REFERENCES Economy." Pp. 233-262 in Dynamics of World Anderson, Perry. 1974. Lineages of the Absolutist Development,edited by RichardRubinson.BevState. London:New Left Books. erly Hills: Sage. Bach, Robert. 1980. "On the Holism of a World- Howe, Gary N. and Alan M. Sica. 1980. "Political Systems Perspective."Pp. 289-310 in Processes andthe Problemof World Economy,Imperialism, of the WorldSystem,editedby TerenceK. Hopkins System Theory."Pp. 235-86 in CurrentPerspecand ImmanuelWallerstein.Beverly Hills: Sage. tives in Social Theory,edited by Scott G. McNall. Bock, Kenneth E. 1956. The Acceptance of HistoGreenwich,CT: JAI Press. ries. Toward a Perspective for Social Science. Johnson, Richard. 1980. "Barrington Moore, Perry Berkeley and Los Angeles: Universityof CaliforAndersonand English Social Development."Pp. nia Press. 48-70 in Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972-79, edited by 'IWallerstein'sdistinguishingachievementis his StuartHall. London:Hutchinson. and epistesustainedchallenge to historiographical Jurgen.1985. "TheSocial Sciences between Kocka, mological traditionsstemming from Enlightenment and Decisionism: A Comparisonof Dogmatism thought in particulartraditionsmatching"socieKarl Marx and Max Weber." Pp. 134-66 in A ties" to "states" that license the construction and Weber-Marx Dialogue, edited by RobertJ. Antoof the social sciences. While compartmentalization nio and RonaldM. Glassman.Lawrence:Univerthere may be doubt about his revision of world hissity of KansasPress. tory,thereis no doubtabouthis epistemologicalinterKosik, Karel. 1976. Dialectics of the Concrete: A vention.

This content downloaded from 200.41.82.24 on Thu, 3 Oct 2013 11:37:00 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

COMPARATIVE WORLD-HISTORICAL ANALYSIS

Studyon Problems of Man and World.Dordrecht, Holland; Boston, USA: D. Reidel Publishing Company. Laslett,Barbara.1980. "BeyondMethodology:The Place of Theory in Quantitative Historical Research." AmericanSociologicalReview45:21428. Llambi, Luis. 1988. "Emergence of Capitalized Family Farms in Latin America." Comparative Studies in Society and History 31:745-74. Marx, Karl.(1939) 1973. Grundrisse. New York: Vintage. McMichael,Philip. 1984. Settlersand the Agrarian Question:Foundationsof Capitalismin Colonial Australia.New York:Cambridge UniversityPress.
. 1987a. "State-Formation and the Con-

397

Ragin, Charlesand David Zaret. 1983. "Theoryand Method in Comparative Research: Two Strategies."Social Forces 61:731-54. Robertson,RolandandFrankLechner.1985. "Modernization,Globalizationand the Problemof Culture in World-SystemsTheory."Theory,Culture and Society 2:103-17. Roseberry,William. 1982. Coffee and Capitalismin the VenezuelanAndes. Austin:Universityof Texas Press. Sayer, Derek. 1987. The Violence of Abstraction: TheAnalyticFoundationsof Historical Materialism. Oxford:Blackwell. Skocpol,Theda.1979.StatesandSocialRevolutions: A ComparativeAnalysis of France, Russia and China. New York:CambridgeUniversityPress.
. 1984. "Emerging Agendas and Recurrent

Strategiesin HistoricalSociology." Pp. 356-91 in Visionand Methodin Historical Sociology, edited . 1987b. "Bringing Circulation Back into by Theda Skocpol. New York: CambridgeUniAgriculturalPolitical Economy: Analyzing the versity Press. Ante-Bellum Plantation in its World Market Smith, Dennis. 1984. "Discovering Facts and ValContext."Rural Sociology 52:242-63. ues: The Historical Sociology of Barrington _. 1988. "The Crisis of the Southern Moore."Pp. 313-55 in Vision and Methodin HisSlaveholderRegime in the WorldEconomy."Pp. torical Sociology, edited by Theda Skocpol. New 43-60 in Rethinking the Nineteenth Century: York:CambridgeUniversityPress. Contradictionsand Movements,edited by Fran- Spencer, Martin E. 1987. "The ImperfectEmpiricisco Ramirez.Westport,CT: GreenwoodPress. cism of the Social Sciences."Sociological Forum . Forthcoming. The "Slaveryin Capitalism: 2:331-72. Rise and Demise of the Ante-Bellum Cotton Tilly, Charles. 1984. Big Structures,Large ProcCulture." Theoryand Society. New York:RussellSage esses, Huge Comparisons. McMichael, Philip and FrederickH. Buttel. 1990. Foundation. "New Directions in the Political Economy of Tomich,Dale. 1990.Slaveryand theCircuitofSugar: Agriculture." SociologicalPerspectives33:89-109 Martiniqueand the WorldEconomy, 1830-1848. Moore, BarringtonJr. 1958. Political Power and Baltimore:The Johns HopkinsUniversityPress. Social Theory. Cambridge:HarvardUniversity Wallerstein,Immanuel.1974. "TheRise and Future Press. Demise of the WorldCapitalistSystem:Concepts for Comparative . 1967. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Analysis." ComparativeStudies Democracy. Lord and Peasant in the Making of in Society and History 16:387-415. the ModernWorld.Boston: Beacon. . 1979. "World Networks and the Politics Nisbet, Robert. 1969. Social Change and History. of the World-Economy."Pp. 269-78 in Societal London:OxfordUniversityPress. Growth: Processes and Implications, edited by Parsons, Talcott. 1973. "ComparativeStudies and Amos H. Hawley. New York:Free Press. EvolutionaryChange."Pp. 97-140 in Compara. 1983. The Capitalist World Economy. tive Methodsin Sociology, edited by Ivan Vallier. New York: CambridgeUniversityPress. Berkeley,Los Angeles andLondon:Universityof . 1989. The Modern World-System, III: The CaliforniaPress. Second Era of Great Expansion of the Capitalist The Polanyi,Karl. 1957. TheGreatTransformation: 1730-1840's. New York: AcaWorld-Economy, Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. demic Press. Boston: Beacon Press. Przeworski, Adam, and Henry Teune. 1970. The Walton,John. 1984. ReluctantRebels. Comparative and Underdevelopment. StudiesofRevolution New Social Inquiry.New York: Logic of Comparative York:ColumbiaUniversityPress. JohnWiley and Sons. Ragin, Charles C. 1981. "ComparativeSociology Weber, Max. 1949. The Methodologyof the Social Sciences. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press. andtheComparative Method." International JourMorrisJr.1973."Intelligible Zelditch, Comparisons." nal of Comparative Sociology 22:102-20. Pp. 267-307 in ComparativeMethods in Sociol.1987. The Comparative Method: Moving ogy, edited by Ivan Vallier. Berkeley, Los AngeBeyond Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. les and London:University of CaliforniaPress. Berkeley:Universityof CaliforniaPress.

structionof the World Market."Pp. 187-237 in Political Power and Social Theory,Vol. 6, edited by MauriceZeitlin. Greenwich,CT.: JAI Press.

This content downloaded from 200.41.82.24 on Thu, 3 Oct 2013 11:37:00 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions