Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
Following the revision of ISO 9001:2000 to the 2008 edition, Excel Partnership has published this
document providing a summary of the changes and their likely impact to organizations. The changes
do not represent any modification to the intent of ISO 9001, mainly just rewording to update the
standard in the light of other reference documents and clarification of wording. The most significant
changes are in the addition of clarification notes which may be of benefit to organizations looking for
ideas on how to interpret the requirements. In any case, the fact that the standard is being updated
represents an opportunity for organizations to revisit some of the requirements and how these are
interpreted and implemented within an organization.
Note: The reference numbers refer to the clause numbers of ISO 9001:2008.
Section Changes Impact of Change
Section 0.1: The introduction makes mention of the influence None
General of an organization’s business environment,
changes and associated risks.
Section 1.1 - Additional guidance has been added to ‘Note 1’ In so far as ‘notes’ are only
Scope - relating to the term ‘product’ This states that the provided as guidance, there is no
General ‘product’ not only applies to the product actual change to the standard
intended for, or required by, a customer, but other than to clarify the term
also that intended for, or required by the product ‘product’. It has always been the
realization process and any intended output practice of training and
resulting from such processes, including certification bodies to use the
purchasing. An additional note has been added term ‘product’ in this broader
stating that ‘Statutory and regulatory sense, and so no practical
requirements may be expressed as legal change to interpretation is likely
requirements to occur
4.1 Quality 4.1e adds the words “where applicable” to This clarifies what was
Management monitoring and measuring previously understood in that
System measurements are required
where they add value
The paragraph on outsourcing has some text No change to the intent of the
changes relating to the control of outsourced standard, just to affirm that
processes. Instead of stating ‘control of such there must be a defined
outsourced processes shall be identified’ the methodology for control of
wording has changed to ‘the type and extent of outsourced processes
control to be applied to these outsourced described in the organization’s
processes shall be defined’ within the quality management system if such
management system. processes exist. If this has not
been considered by
The words ‘analysis and improvement’ have been organizations using the
added to Note 1, to include these aspects as standard then this needs to be
processes, and additional notes added to explain considered. Notes give
the term ‘outsourced processes and examples of additional guidance on the
‘control’ that may be applied to outsourced subject
processes together with some guidance on
considerations that outsourced processes should
ensure conformity to customer, statutory and legal
requirements
4.2.1 Some minor wording changes, and the words None, unless the organization
Documentation ‘records required by this international standard’ has elected to document each
requirements - have been deleted. This is, however, now requirement for a procedure in
General covered in section 4.2d. a separate document
6.2.1 Human A note has been added stating that ‘conformity to No change to original intent of
Resources - product requirements may be affected directly or the standard.
General indirectly by personnel performing any task within
the quality management system’ and thus
personnel involved in such activities are required
to be competent on the basis of appropriate
education, training, skills and experience
6.2.2 The organization is required to ‘determine the No change to intent of the
Competence, necessary competence for personnel performing standard, but more emphasis
awareness and work affecting ‘conformity to product on competence and the
training requirements’ as opposed to ‘product quality’. confirmation that this has been
Taking Crosby’s definition of quality as achieved.
‘conformance to requirements’ these may be
understood to say the same thing.
7.1 Planning of The word ‘measurement’ has been added to the No change to the original intent
product requirement that ‘in planning product realization, of the standard.
realization the organization shall determine (as appropriate),
the required, verification, validation, monitoring,
measurement, inspection and test activities
specific to the product and the criteria for product
acceptance
7.2.1 Minor clarification of wording from ‘requirements Control of ‘post-delivery’
Determination determined by the organization’ to ‘requirements activities was required in the
of considered necessary by the organization’. previous version of the
requirements standard, so no change has
related to the
product
A note has been added to provide explanation as been made to the intent. It
to what is considered ‘post delivery’ (i.e. activities might, however, be prudent for
including, for example, actions under warranty organizations to check that the
provisions, contractual obligations such as relevant examples provided in
maintenance services, and supplementary the note are covered within the
services such as recycling or final disposal). management system
7.3.1 Design A note has been added stating that ‘design and As the previous version of the
and development review, verification and validation standard did not specify how
development have distinct purposes. They may be conducted review, verification and
planning and recorded separately or in any combination as validation activities were to be
suitable for the product and the organization’ conducted and recorded, there
is no change to the intent of the
standard
7.3.3 Design Minor rewording; from ‘form that enables No change to the intent of the
and verification’ to ‘form suitable for verification’. original standard, however
development Additional note added stating ‘information for organizations obviously should
outputs production and service provision may include ensure that the design output
details for the preservation of product’. does in fact provide for the
This amplifies the requirement that the design ‘safe and proper use’ of the
output is required to ‘specify the characteristics of product
the product that are essential for its safe and
proper use’.
7.5.4 Customer Minor rewording has taken place to the The note states that customer
Property requirement (‘records maintained’ to ‘maintain property can include intellectual
records’). property and personal data.
The organization thus should
A note has been added to include ‘personal data’ ensure that such data is
as customer property properly controlled and
protected as per the
requirements of clause 7.5.4.
This obviously has
repercussions in terms of the
security of computer data
stored on memory
sticks/computer hard drives etc.
and has linkages to the Data
Protection Act with the concept
of “personal data”.
8.2.3 Monitoring Minor editing has been undertaken to remove the The note gives some
and words ‘to ensure conformity of the product’. clarification on the
measurement of However the intent of the clause remains the establishment of
processes same. measurement/monitoring
systems which are appropriate
An additional note has been added relating to to the needs of the
consideration of the type and extent of monitoring organization. This may be a
and measurement and its impact on the product useful prompt for organizations
and system who are already ISO 9001
compliant to revisit such
systems to ensure that the
monitoring and measurement
systems are appropriate to
meet needs
8.2.4 Monitoring The standard now specifies that ‘records shall None
and indicate the person(s) authorizing release of
measurement of product for delivery to the customer’. This
product emphasises the general theme of ‘customer focus’
throughout the standard.