Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Arthur M. Harkins
University of Minnesota
George H. Kubik
Anticipatory Futures Group, LLC
Second Edition
STORYTECH
A personalized guide to the 21st century Second Edition
StoryTech: A personalized guide to the 21st century by Arthur M. Harkins & George H. Kubik
ISBN 978-0-9787434-1-3
Copyright 2012 Arthur M. Harkins & George H. Kubik This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
iv
For all those who have the courage to tell their stories ...and to live them!
COntents
Prologue: How to use this guidebook, p. 1 Chapter 1: Introducing StoryTech, p. 7 Chapter 2: Becoming intimate with StoryTech, p. 23 Chapter 3: Practicing StoryTech in groups, p. 41 Chapter 4: Further experience with StoryTech in communities, p. 65 Chapter 5: Conducting education StoryTechs, p. 87 Chapter 6: Facilitating health & aging StoryTechs, p. 129 Chapter 7: Facilitating StoryTech with international groups, p. 153 Epilogue, p. Epilogue on page 171 References and recommended readings, p. 177
vi
Welcome to StoryTech!
StoryTech offers a dynamic 21st century approach for integrating the power of your personal stories with the collective wisdom of groups, organizations, and societies. This Guidebook will introduce you to a very old process that enhances your strategic ability to deal with change and opportunity. This Guidebook is written in a holographic, non-linear style. In order to satisfy your curiosity and uniqueness, the chapters are not chained together sequentially. You are encouraged to select chapters that have immediate interest to you and read the remaining chapters as your curiosity evolves. Key concepts repetitively appear across different chapters where they are presented from different perspectives and with different objectives. You are encouraged to apply your individual uniqueness in reading this Guidebook. The Guidebook will then become unique to you! The writing style is purposely kept lively and explorative. StoryTech is an exciting and constantly evolving subject. Hence, you the reader and we, the writers, must explore the topic together. This is accomplished, in part, by inviting you to actively engage in a variety of challenging exercises. Each of the exercises contained in this Guidebook explores the capabilities, promises, and rewards of the StoryTech process and is part of the process of constructing individual knowledge. We hope that you will enjoy reading this Guidebook to StoryTech as much as we have enjoyed preparing it! Lets proceed to your rst experience with the StoryTech process!
1
and content, purpose, and ow. This Guidebook explores and explains the historical evolution of story telling and narrative technology. It puts forth the modern evolution of applied story telling in the framework of StoryTech. The Guidebook interacts with its readers by exploring several applications of the StoryTech process. StoryTech assumes that all humans have the capacity to consciously transform theirpersonal and collective stories for strategic purposes. Renowned psychiatrist Viktor Frankl wrote, The individual does not simply exist, but always decides what his or her existence will be, what he or she will become in the next moment.
Stories in a nutshell
Stories are dynamic simulations. They are software for the mind. Stories are about personal theories of self and realities, and the nature of relationships between self and contexts. Personal stories are a form of self-talk in which non-verbal internal narratives (e.g., pre-conscious thoughts, sub-vocalizations or subconscious statements) are internally created, rehearsed, and adopted or rejected. Stories are a method for organizing, rehearsing, and communicating information and knowledge at pre-conscious and conscious levels. Stories are tools for the creation of contexts. Stories are self-narratives: At the level of the individual, stories are narrative representations of personal beliefs, imagination, intuition and pre-conscious or conscious thoughts and/or organizing principles. Collective narratives: At the collective level (e.g., society, culture, tribe), stories are narrative representations of group beliefs, thoughts, and/or organizing principles. Stories are personal theories of self and reality(s), and the nature of relationships between self and environment. Personal stories are a form of self-talk in which non-verbal internal narratives (e.g., thematic pre-conscious thoughts, sub-vocalizations or subconscious statements) are internally created, rehearsed, and adopted or rejected. Stories are a methodology for organizing, rehearsing, and/or communicating information at the pre-conscious and conscious levels. Stories are tools for context creation (i.e., innovation-driven knowledge work). Initiated in part by the spirit and intent of Frankls writings and self-innovation concepts, and in part by Japanese Shinto story traditions, this Guide-
book explores the ways in which individuals can consciously, creatively, and purposively decide what their existence could be and what they might become, both personally and professionally. Readers are provided with guidance and opportunities to practice constructing their own customized portraits of what they might become and how they might operate as leaders in the worlds of work, community, and family.
Like any technology, StoryTech is based on several fundamental assumptions. First, it presupposes that everyone is a natural story-teller. Every individual has valuable stories to tell and creative perspectives to impart. It is this inexhaustible diversity and uniqueness inherent in each individual that serves as the unmatched resource fueling the StoryTech process. Through StoryTech, many people have been helped to teach themselves how to rethink, re-purpose, and redirect their futures. StoryTech denotes a process of self-de-velopment and self-instruction that is embedded throughout this Guidebook. We place ourselves in a consultative role to the readers of this Guidebook. We want to help you make positive and productive changes in your life, but within the framework of your values and under your control. A fundamental assumption of StoryTech is that humans can consciously and pragmatically transform their personal and collective stories for strategic purposes. It is our intent to impart the tenets of StoryTech to aid you in achieving this goal. Although segments of this Guidebook refer to theory, our fundamental purpose for writing StoryTech remains highly practical. We hope that when the reader is only a few pages into the Guidebook he or she will begin to discover ways to put the StoryTech process to use in some corner of living, learning, and working. We wish to establish contacts with those who take this step, and will count them among our colleagues of practice. StoryTech is a Guidebook for creative futuring. Those wishing to probe into the underlying theories of story telling as a personal technology will nd more detailed guidance in the annotated resources contained in the Appendix. We encourage this. Our fundamental purpose for writing StoryTech remains highly practical. We hope that when the reader is only a few pages into the Guidebook he or she will begin to discover ways to put the StoryTech process to use in some corner of living, learning, and working. We hope to establish contacts with those who take this step, and will count them among our colleagues of practice. Historically, stories have been used to: Explain pasts Interpret presents Project and map futures
10
As you read this Guidebook, you will benet by asking yourself certain basic questions about who you are, and who you wish to become. For example, what is your identity? How do you orient yourself to the future? How do you continue to grow and improve while avoiding inexibility, stasis, or stagnation? Do you want to become a more innovative individual? How much motivation do you have, and how much more would you prefer to have? How should you apply your reservoir of motivation? Our approach to these questions operates from a simple assumption: the answers to these and similar questions depends upon how you see yourself and in what contexts you place yourself. The personal technology embodied in StoryTech is designed to help you selectively alter your self-descriptions and contexts in order to pre-experience or rehearse altered or new futures. These simulations help to evoke and shape self-knowledge that can improve your future choices and the decision rules you employ to reach them. StoryTech values stories based on their contribution to individual or collective development: StoryTech does not judge stories on the basis of right or wrong. Stories act as attractors for future behaviors. Stories are manifestations of fundamental and unique organizing principles at work within individuals and groups. In a nutshell, StoryTech will help you create new roles and contexts to expand your explorations of yourself and your futures. You will be in the drivers seat all the way. Specically, StoryTech will help you: Support the development of your innovative self as an engine for exploring future performance and innovation competencies. Provide a personal technology for anticipatory role constructions and rehearsals. Provide the means to develop internal contexts for comfortable selfdevelopment. Provide the means to purposively add strategic value to self and others. To help make these outcomes a satisfying reality to you, we will: Provide for continuously creative behavior throughout the StoryTech process.
11
Show how creativity enhances your innovation capital, thereby helping you to create and manage desirable futures. Show you how to creatively work with and lead others through the StoryTech processes. Hold on a moment! Are you doubting that youre actually an innovative person? Do you suspect that you may not be innovative enough to gain much from this work? If so, relax! It is more than probable that you are very innovative during every day of your life. It is also somewhat probable that you dont believe that supposition is true. You may allow this: I am somewhat creative, but not innovative. If so, this is a feather in your cap, because you recognize the difference between creating novelty and putting it to work in your life. In other words, you understand the difference between creativity and innovation. Creativity, StoryTech, and StoryTech processes are all about creativity and its innovative applications.
The societies of today are undergoing extraordinary informational, social, and technological transformations. The magnitude and accelerated pace of these changes requires continuous personal and social renewal. This places a premium on peoples sense of efcacy to shape their futures.
Our Guidebook introduces StoryTech as a modern application of the ancient human capacity for storytelling. It will address the purpose, structures, and process of story constructions. It will provide concrete steps for the construction of new personal knowledge to support intellectually and emotionally improved decision making now and in the future. It will explore and explain the evolution of storytelling as an individualized strategic process capable of bringing value to individuals, and through them, to groups. StoryTech speaks to people who want to create positive outcomes in their emerging futures. StoryTech facilitators are individuals whose innovative stories and scenarios make a positive difference in the totality of their lives, including their interactions with others at work, in the community and in the home. Historically, storytelling based on oral tradition has been used to: Strengthen and change cultural beliefs. Transmit knowledge and ideas. Communicate values and principles. Coalesce and clarify reality.
StoryTech does not: Replace analytical thinking. Replace scientic experimentation or testing. StoryTech is not a form of science, but rather a form of personal, social, and cultural technology. The intent of StoryTech and its accompanying exercises is to help individuals, communities and groups develop positive visions of their futures, and to translate these visions into innovations that produce desirable outcomes. Stories: Are based on narrative models (creation or invention). Are thematic and unique. Emphasize metaphorical thought. Generate unlimited variety (multiple platforms, perspectives, patterns, connections, etc.). Immerse subjects in phenomena as essential participants. Are imprecise but directive, based on analogical reasoning. Describe phenomena fluidly and changeably.
14
Science: Is based on experimental models (discovery of one reality). Uses repeatable processes. Employs similes and isomorphs. Limits/sharpens perspectives. Separates observers from observed phenomena. Prefers precise, dened, abstract reasoning. Prefers phenomena are knowable and predictable in detail.
How can this technological approach produce real results for individuals? For thousands of years, stories have been the major pedagogical tool of all cultures. For example, Jack and Jill is a story about two people who intend to seek and transport water, but who suffer an outcome probably fatal to Jack. This story was intended to convey a warning that even the simplest and most familiar of futures can be dangerous.
StoryTech combines:
Advantages of age-old story telling Communication (dynamic events and ideas) Immersion Imagination Participation & involvement Self-validated understanding Some advantages of science (specicity; rigor) Communication (contextually constructed information) Deep personal attachment Subjective rationality (individualized) Self-organizing evolution Connecting internal and external realities Virtual transcendence of time But students as young as the fth grade easily understand that the original Jack and Jill story offers a frontier of limitless possible adventures involving these two characters. This is because Jack and Jill offers a sufcient foundation for virtualizing the original story -- for making it a ramp into successful futures. StoryTech authors can choose to make the outcomes of these stories positive: Jack does not always have to endure a skull fracture! The reasoning structures used for building Jack and Jill stories are the same as those underlying computerized simulations of families, societies
15
or civilizations. Such exercises are projected years or centuries forward into virtual futures. A very large market is building for such simulations. StoryTech communicates: Large amounts of relatively hidden knowledge (i.e., tacit knowledge) through relatively simple stories. Large amounts of explicit information, which is creatively combined with tacit information. StoryTech combines tacit (personal) and explicit (group) knowledge to: Convey meaning. Stimulate new perspectives and patterns of understanding. This Guidebook describes a process that has been used in private and public sector organizations since 1989. Used in the context of public communities, StoryTech is a method for allowing a fuller glimpse of what young and old, professional and non-professional story-writers project or envision as personal and community outcomes. StoryTech: Stimulates new perspectives, patterns of thought and strategic purpose. Generates new understanding(s) of how ideas might work in other contexts. Develops individual input into creating group futures. Promotes sense-making of complex phenomena. Promotes new understanding(s) of change in terms of: Desirability Plausibility The StoryTech process is transitional, focusing on paths from the present toward preferred personal and community futures. The guided nature of the process asks the writer to help create successful virtual (seeming or apparent) selves in pre-described successful futures. The writers task is to dene and esh out the virtual self who has helped to create futures with their successful personal and community outcomes. The effect of creating successful virtual selves and positive personal and organizational outcomes is to motivate individuals and to offer enhanced choices to groups and organizations, thereby beneting larger communities.
16
A virtual approach to your 21st Century futures means a seeming approach -- one that allows the use of your imagination to create meaningful, positive choices concerning your future. StoryTech will show you how to bring hidden, or tacit, personal knowledge into the information base of the community. By using newly available information, the community will be able to reconsider its future alternatives. Throughout this Guidebook youll notice that your story exercises begin with questions about the context of the story. This is important because the quality of the stories will be improved if such questions are asked and answered. The advantages of StoryTech include: 1. Developing skills for describing and evaluating plausible personal futures; and, 2. Demonstrating that plausible personal futures do not have to be delayed until tomorrow -- their development can begin today. Your rst task as an StoryTech facilitator is to help inform yourself about plausible futures for the community. Next, you will engage yourself in creating, describing and evaluating plausible futures through the StoryTech process. The StoryTech process consists of written exercises, group discussions, and written and oral feedback of previous StoryTech exercises. The outcomes of StoryTech exercises are two-fold: 1. A rich data base on your alternative futures is established, and these futures are ranked in order of their plausibility. 2. At selected points in the process you will benet from weaving together the most appealing components of several stories. This results in the production of cumulative StoryTech products which can be offered as new information to organizations and communities.
17
and give meaning to key events and decisions. Stories anticipate and solve future problems and create future opportunities. Stories are told, retold, interpreted, and embellished to describe how things are done somewhere, how they were done, and how they will be done. StoryTech is a self-guided method based on the ages-old storytelling skills of our species. The StoryTech narrative method was specically created to seek out, mine, and alchemize the strategic priorities of individuals participating in personal and community change. StoryTech helps users generate new menus of options for the future without slight- ing the dignity or importance of personal agendas. This course will ask your group to develop and maintain an information base of stories so that your individual commitments wont be lost. StoryTech is particularly focused on how we can do things in our future. It is an inherently logical process, subject to change, amplication, and enjoyable communication to others. It is based on the shared richness, variety, and believability of stories developed by individuals alone or within an organization. StoryTech captures, holds, and convincingly displays compelling images of personal and community futures. StoryTech is a process for the enhanced extraction, analysis, and synthesis of information, knowledge, and ideas about personal and community futures. It uses the individuals unique insight, common sense, wisdom, creativity, and intimate knowledge to expand menus of choices for the future. StoryTech provides strong and renewable associations between individual and community visions of the future, and links these directly to current societal climates. In summary, the purpose of using StoryTech is to help construct menus of stories about futures, our roles in helping to create futures, and our efforts to improve the quality of individual and community efciency by sharing stories.
Shortly after returning from Japan, Harkins began offering StoryTech to clients. One of the discoveries from that rst use of StoryTech was the uniformly positive attitudes of participants toward developing, telling, and listening to strategic stories. StoryTech has now been used with a very broad range of clients at all levels: award winning managers, medical professionals, power company executives, and government employees, and in all Harkins University of Minnesota classes and graduate seminars.
19
futures are the best ones under specic conditions. As a process futurist, I use guided storytelling as a methodology for helping clients explore and manage their futures. We have learned a number of things about the use for guided storytelling and its effects on individuals and organizations. This Guidebook shares that knowledge with you! Stories have a virtual relationship to everyday reality. They help us create visions of where our change management and futures thinking should lead us.
20
21
22
There is a growing need for individuals to understand and manage personal changes which may lead to more rewarding futures. This Guidebook aims to help you identify learning opportunities by telling yourself positive stories about your futures. Futures derived from the StoryTech process are personally tailored by each
23
individual participant. StoryTech allows for such personalization through individualized story-telling. The versatility of StoryTech encourages a variety of futures for each participant and every group. The individual is critically important to StoryTech. You are the very best source of positive stories about your own learning and teaching futures. Your own desires and expectations are important factors in the stories you choose to tell yourself about your future productivity and happiness. The stories you tell yourself about what you want and what you are willing to work for can signicantly change your choices about yourself and your organization or community. By telling yourself positive stories about your own learning behavior in the futures of tomorrow and beyond, you can gain valuable condence in your ability to create desirable alternatives within your life.
24
Guidebook principles
This Guidebook is established on the principle that people who learn to tell positive stories about their futures should be more likely to want and expect to live as effective members of their communities. The Guidebook encourages two kinds of interactivity: First, within our own persons; and second, between us and others members of the community.
25
increase the number, variety, and quality of choices available for inventing personal and community futures. Personal stories are useful for the reception, storage, transmission and transformation of information useful to organizations during their community pre-planning processes. Stories usually have inputs from outside themselves, and they can generate new information on the inside. Stories are very useful as platforms for community pre-planning and many other information-driven purposes. Stories give rich potential to the community pre-planning environment from the standpoint of creating visions, or vectors, of where professional planning should actually take us. Shared stories act as a vision envelope that promotes more efficient, coordinated, and synergistic group pre-planning work. Any of us may have many unique stories at his/her disposal, and each of these is capable of presenting new information to the group. Even if we have few professional skills, we are easily able to learn, modify, create, and tell personally important stories -- with no trouble at all! Storytelling permits positive and effective participation in organizational and community pre-planning activities. The person who is sharing personal stories with the group is engaged is communicating as a valuable, socially empowered human being. She or he is a leader. Stories are dynamic: A primary function of the human mind is to construct models of different realities. Generic or foundational stories are building blocks for models. Guiding stories tend to direct individual behavior. Desirable stories tend to be self-fullling. StoryTech creates new or modied futures: StoryTech cannot transmit socially factual stories about the future. StoryTech can develop and transmit socially heuristic stories about the future. StoryTech can transmit robust personal stories about alternative futures.
26
Personal stories can be aggregated to produce synthesized stories about alternative organizational or social futures and how to achieve them.
27
28
be a changer. You can decide what change is needed and work to make it happen. You can change yourself and you can help other people change. You can introduce change in your life, at your work and in your organization or community. You can implement change instead of waiting for change to occur.
Stories have historically transferred cultural knowledge from the past to the present. Today, stories are also used to dene and rehearse alternative futures and preferred outcomes, which then influence the present. Stories are tools to reinterpret the past as well as to strategize and rehearse new futures. Stories serve as prototypes for the construction of more detailed realities, strategies, and visions. Stories expand self-concepts, world views, and the missions and goals of persons, organizations, and communities. To generate opportunities like this requires creativity. You have to be able to look at the world and see it in new ways. If you are not accustomed to looking at life this way, your creative energies need to be rekindled. If your creativity lies dormant, it can re reawakened. We all have some creative ability and there are many ways to reinvigorate our creative spirit. But remember: StoryTech cannot transmit factual stories about the future. StoryTech can transmit robust stories about alternative futures. The best way to rekindle creativity is to begin exercising your brain. When you are confronted with a problem, dont gure out just one way to solve it, come up with 100 different solutions. Emphasize quantity, not quality. Look for the unusual. Challenge your assumptions. Just because you have found one good way of doing something, doesnt mean you always have to do it that way. Try other approaches. Find a new way to do your work. Think of new activities you can do. Think of new ways of living.
30
es. Cultural resources have generally developed slowly and continued for long periods. Today, the half-life of cultural myths is much shorter in many contexts. Stories must keep pace with, and ideally outpace, the rates of social, technological, and other forms of change. Strategic stories can provide needed personal and collective re-direction in rapid changing, highly diverse contexts.
31
average increase in your salary per year? Were you in control of most of the major events in your life or was someone else?
32
33
dont you? Why dont you? When was the last time you wanted to make a major change in your life and didnt? Why didnt you? Was your reason worth the sacrice you had to make? Pick a time, such as ve years from now, and gure out what you would like to be doing then. How old will you be? Where do you want to be living? Who do you want to be living with? How old will your friends, parents, spouse and children be? What work do you want to do? What kind of people will you want to work with. How much do you want to earn? What recreational activities will you want to participate in? What hobbies will you have? Where will you go on vacation? What will be the driving forces in your life? Will you be healthy? How much longer will you live? What will medical care be like then? What will be the condition of the world? Of the economy?
34
A plan for your future is important to achieving what you want in life, but there are risks in having a plan. An unexpected event could make the plan impossible to accomplish. In a period of rapid change, the unforeseen event must be expected. You need to be ready for the time when your plan is dealt a fatal blow. To keep from becoming locked into one plan, you need contingency plans. We suggest that you base these plans on StoryTechproduced mental maps.
35
new ones and making them work for you is important. StoryTechs can be junked, replaced and combined. If one doesnt work, you are not a failure. Rather, that approach didnt work. With StoryTechs you can keep your batting average high. You have some hits, walks and strikeouts, but you may still win 80 percent of your games. You still visualize what you want to accomplish, you identify the obstacles and you gure out your step-by-step actions, but you do it in parallel. For example, if you are overweight and in poor physical condition and want to get in shape, you can create several weight loss StoryTechs to help you become physically t. Your StoryTechs could take different approaches. One would consist of ways of becoming physically active, such as playing racquetball, lifting weights, jogging or riding a bicycle. Another would be dieting variations. Under both sets of StoryTechs you would be working toward your image of what you want to become. With one plan your eggs are all in one basket. With StoryTech alternatives, you are flexible and adaptable. You are prepared for change. Whats more, you are increasingly in a position to initiate your own changes rather than wait for them to be offered or forced by others.
36
37
decision choices. Keep reading, keep thinking, keep talking, keep listening, and keep growing. Position yourself with other people who are willing to change and work at a company that strives to change and grow. Accept change as natural. Above all, be excited about the future. The wind is blowing. Open the door. Run outside and feel the wind in your face. Above all, tell positive stories to yourself and to anyone who will listen!
Audience-participants create parallel stories and ll in missing story parts with personal context (experiences).
Results: Personal ownership Retention of control User-friendly vocabulary (natural language)
38
39
40
41
own personal stories, and share their personal stories as part of a generative process. 3. Context changes collapse these stories into proto-typical themes, and are fed into the development of new stories for use by the narrator to re-start the cycle. Several key principles in the creation of new stories are: 1. Narrators provide guiding stories. 2. Participants create new stories based on personal contexts. 3. When direct knowledge or experience is not available, participants ll in the gaps with applied imagination .thus, new stories are created. StoryTech will help you develop How do we get from here to there? scenarios, containing detailed descriptions of pathways to improved personal and collective futures. The StoryTech process encourages them to ask, What impact will an improved menu of futures have on my personal life? On my group or community? The StoryTech process can also be used to reexamine the past and reassess the present.
42
the American social future resemble a melting pot? A salad? A stew? Will it be stable or unstable? How targetable will America become? Changing natural environments: What could new efforts to understand the planet as a system of interrelated weather, oceanic and other processes bring? What are the societal results of rain forest depletion, the greenhouse effect, plankton die-offs, storm pattern changes, gas emissions and temperature changes? Will we have to learn how to cool off the planet? Will some societies gird against environmental changes and ignore the plights of others? Changing spiritual expressions: In the West and elsewhere, traditional forms of religion and morality are under siege by newer forms of situational and personalized moralities. Concepts of deities and their relationship to men and women are being modernized to reflect concerns about the environment, the destruction of wealth, womens rights, and the plight of children. In the midst of all this change, traditionalist churches flourish in North America and Europe. What will all this pot-boiling bring about? Is there a backlash coming, perhaps on a global scale? Changing health issues: The life expectancy of humankind is increasing as a function of changes in food, hygiene, public health and medical services. Societies are grappling with issues of how to deliver the fruits of these changes less developed societies with the delivery of food and public health, and developed societies with the allocation of costly medical technologies. Paradoxically, both rich and poor alike suffer from the expectations of increased standards of living, a phenomenon often associated with stress diseases. Changing recreation and leisure: For those with the means, our planet is becoming a tourist playground. Electronics offer magical leisure for the well-off. Some homes contain machines that are the equivalent of commercial gyms. Some leisure activities damage the natural environment. How will recreation look in the future? How can we balance recreation with environmental protection? How do we protect weaker societies from massive tourism impacts? Are video games replacing disciplined learning? Changing built environments: The sheer number of houses, coupled with their sewer, water, heating, cooling and transportation requirements, have begun to develop whole system impacts. Factories, offices, shopping malls, roads, cars, planes, and even space vehicles and platforms have added to the complexity of the built environment. Only now are we beginning to understand the importance of proper management of the built
43
environment. Is the built environment a form of eco-cancer? How can we control urban sprawl? What is happening to farms, greenbelts, and protected lands? Changing communications: The speed of communications has jumped to the speed of light. Telecommunications hardware moves information around the planet faster than many individuals, groups and cultures are able to cope with. How do we manage this change? One response has been machine intelligence and neural networks designed to manage the chaos caused by clashes between light-speed information and slow cultures. But what are the effects of becoming dependent on hardware to keep up with other hardware? Changing education: Some critics are questioning whether mass education is still possible when we struggle to raise the performances of the bottom 50 percent of the American society so that they can cope with change. Others seek to redene the goals of education in a technologically advanced society with its portable learning devices and information bases. Still others discuss education reform in the context of life-long learning. What are the possible futures of an education system that seems to be giving up, redening its mission, and expanding its client base -all at the same time? Changing home lives: Declining nuclear and extended families in America have stimulated numerous choices in intimate lifestyle structures. Yet a growing number of these new structures are associated with poverty and the loss of choices. Is there a need for new legislation or economic incentives for certain structures? Abortion rights, crack babies, fetal alcoholism syndrome, smoking during pregnancy, and child support have raised anew issues of childrens rights and parental responsibilities. Should these concerns justify greater intervention into the privacy of the family? What restraints should there be on these interventions?
2. Place the group as accurately as possible within the context of the present, changing world. 3. Envision alternative positive futures for the group. 4. Suggest ways of inventing and implementing these futures. The following questions can serve as models... 1. What kinds of information and knowledge does your group need but cannot get access to right now? Why are they not available? How will you gain access? 2. What types of human interaction are currently possible within the group? 3. What values does the group currently espouse? 4. What underlying myths currently lend support to the activities of the group? 5. What is the present structure of the group? 6. What is the role of autonomy in the group? Individualism? Creativity? 7. What is your groups most basic need for the immediate future (1-5 years)? How can an opportunity-oriented approach to the future help the group meet that need? 8. What personality types are best suited for the work of your group? 9. Inventory the dominant paradigms which make up the culture of your group. 10. What are the social, economic, technological, political, and environmental attitudes of your group? 11. Do the intellectual, emotional, moving, and instinctive operations of your group serve to facilitate proaction through group interactions? 12. Identify the boundaries and horizons of your group. 13. Identify your groups desirable functions and undesirable dysfunctions. 14. Ask a successful minority person how various institutions in the group helped or hindered his or her rise to prominence. Another step is to gain a broad understanding of the group. This is crucial for developing a sense of the groups options for the future and possible ways of implementing these options and continuing on-going improvement. Here are the steps to getting started: 1. Choose a group agency or agencies to study. It could be one with which you are already associated--school, job, social group. Or you could start from scratch and choose one that especially interests you. The following is a broad list of possibilities: for-prot, non-prot, volunteer, professional, big business, small business, church, school, club, social service, and government department or agency. 2. Contact appropriate members of the agency or agencies for interviews.
45
If possible, arrange with them to put the interviews on a continuing basis, for it will take more than one to complete your task. 3. Prepare for the interviews. Gather basic, public information about the agency (ies) yourself. Prepare to get at the information you want. Ask general questions rst, more detailed ones later.
Help experts, specialists and group citizens to cope with such questions routinely. Coping with change on a daily basis will make change seem less strange and invasive, and will put the average citizen of your group in an empowered relationship to both personal and collective futures. The StoryTech process is designed specically with the empowerment goal in mind.
46
Weve rebuilt our groups future and were eager to help other communities do the same.
Here are several relatively detailed exercises that will demonstrate some of the ways to involve group members in writing StoryTech exercises. Modify these exercises as necessary for your group!
47
Heres a realistic practice StoryTech exercise. Youll notice that the StoryTech exercise starts off with questions about the ambiance and setting of your story. This is important because the quality of your story will be greatly improved if such questions are answered. It is the afternoon of November ____ (year). You are talking with a new friend who established residency in your community late in the year 2013. Please describe exactly where you and your friend are carrying out your conversation. Are you indoors or out? ___________________________________________ What is the weather like on November ______? ___________________________________________ What kind of clothing are you wearing? ___________________________________________ The other person? ___________________________________________ Why is your conversation relaxed and friendly ___________________________________________ Why is the newcomer so approving of the stability and quality of social life in your community? ___________________________________________
48
In the year 2013, you and your friend agree, your communitys quality of social life is as good or better than in any other place on the world. After listening to your friend, what do you say have been the major contributions of education and health care toward you communitys high quality of social life? Education: ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ Health: ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ Why are the other communities starting to adopt these approaches to education and health? Why are those communities also experiencing success? ___________________________________________
Tell your group Thank You! for completing this StoryTech exercise about your groups future. Tell them that results will be shared on a voluntary basis during this meeting, and that a summary of everyones stories will be provided by your facilitator at the next meeting.
49
Group Process StoryTech Number 2 Community 2013: Whats Our Story? __________
What is the date two weeks from today? ___________________________________________ What is the location where are you talking with your friend two weeks from today -- is it indoors or out? Please describe the location. ___________________________________________ Please describe your friend. What does she or he look like, and how is she or he dressed? ___________________________________________ What are you wearing? ___________________________________________ Why is your conversation with your close friend relaxed, friendly, and happy? ___________________________________________ Your close friend comments that you seem strong and condent. He or she asks, How did you completely overcome your feelings of worry about doing StoryTechs? You smile at your friend and say: ___________________________________________ Your friend listens, smiles back, and says: ___________________________________________
50
You are delighted by your friends comment. You think for a moment, and then change the subject to your general future. You say, When I think about my future now, and any chance that fearing change will ever threaten me again, I laugh, and think ___________________________________________ Your friend grins, pats you on the back, and says: ___________________________________________
51
Group Process StoryTech Number 3 Community 2013: Whats Our Story? __________
It is four weeks from today. Your StoryTech program is going very well. You have stopped worrying and you feel stronger than ever before. You have completed four weeks of successful StoryTech visioning. Due to your belief in yourself, you have volunteered to assist newcomers in their StoryTech process. A new group member approaches you and comments on your positive energy and enthusiasm. What is the date four weeks from today? ___________________________________________ Where is this meeting taking place? How is the room set up? Are you sitting or standing as you converse with others? Describe the atmosphere that surrounds you. ___________________________________________ Please describe the new member who approaches you. What does he or she look like? ___________________________________________ How are you dressed? ___________________________________________ Why do you feel comfortable and safe in conversing and sharing your ideas with this new member? ___________________________________________ The new member is impressed by your positive attitude and asks, What are three changes you are making to take charge of your future?
52
___________________________________________
The new member listens closely, nods and says: ___________________________________________ You are lled with excitement by the new members responses to your comments. You tell him or her so, and with enthusiasm in your voice, you say: ___________________________________________ The new member concludes the conversation by commenting that he/she is delighted to have met you and that from your obvious success and positive attitude, he or she has now set the following personal futuring goals ___________________________________________
53
Group Process StoryTech Number 4 Community 2013: Whats Our Story? __________
It is six weeks from today. Your StoryTech program is going very well. You have stopped worrying and you feel more capable than ever before. You are at a restaurant discussing your StoryTech progress with someone who began his or her story-based futuring when you did. You are exchanging comments concerning the various resources you have utilized in your successful futuring, the benets you have received from using these resources, and the power of choice you have been able to incorporate in the management of the groups futures. What is the date six weeks from today? ___________________________________________ What does the restaurant look like? Are you drinking coffee? Eating? What time of day is it? ___________________________________________ Please describe your companion. What does she or he look like, and how is she or he dressed? ___________________________________________ What are you wearing? ___________________________________________ Why is your conversation open, honest, relaxed and friendly? ___________________________________________
54
Six weeks of StoryTech experience has opened your eyes to several resources available to assist you in your futuring efforts. In discussing them with your companion, you identify three resources which have been signicant in your personal futuring successes: 1. ___________________________________________ 2. ___________________________________________ 3. ___________________________________________ In turn, your futuring companion identies three different resources which he or she feels have signicantly contributed to his or her successes: 1. ___________________________________________ 2. ___________________________________________ 3. ___________________________________________ You are inspired and moved by your companions uplifting and hopeful comments and begin to think anew about your own future. You express excitement and enthusiasm for what might lie ahead, and tell your companion that in your future you can now see the following positive opportunities: ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________
As you get ready to leave the restaurant, your companion conrms that he or she believes that you will no doubt reach your goals because you have the power to achieve them. You respond to this supportive statement by saying: ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________
55
56
What are you wearing? ___________________________________________ Why is your conversation with your co-worker relaxed, friendly, and happy? ___________________________________________
Your co-worker tells you that he or she has noticed a change in you that you seem happier, healthier, and more condent. You respond to these observations by saying: ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________
You go on to explain that after four months of writing futuring stories, you can feel yourself moving toward personal empowerment. You can feel --growing both inside and outside you-- the hope and encouragement needed to shape the groups future. ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ Your co-worker asks: How does personal futuring assist you in your efforts toward helping the group achieve better futures? ___________________________________________ Your co-worker listens, and with much admiration, says: ___________________________________________
57
You are pleased and flattered by your co-workers comment. You think for a moment, and then direct the conversation toward the future. You know that you will never doubt your group again, and that the reason you can make that statement with the utmost condence is: ___________________________________________ Your friend offers her or his support, and encourages your continued success by saying: ___________________________________________
58
You are proud of your decision to become adept at futuring and to help your group to do the same. You express that pride to your partner. You acknowledge that positive changes have begun to occur in your life. You share with your spouse or signicant other three of the positive changes you already have begun to experience. They are: 1. ___________________________________________ 2. ___________________________________________ 3. ___________________________________________ Your spouse or signicant other comments on the positive changes he or she can already see taking place. You ask him or her to identify three group changes that they have noticed during twelve weeks of StoryTech futuring. He or she smilingly identies the following three positive group changes: 1. ___________________________________________ 2. ___________________________________________ 3. ___________________________________________ You smile with recognition and respond: ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________
You express condent hope for the groups future and your spouse/signicant other expresses a shared belief in that hope. You say to him or her, What I hope the group can accomplish is: ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________
60
Your spouse or signicant gives you a hug you as you get ready to leave the restaurant. I believe in our group, he or she says, and the reason that well absolutely succeed together is ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________
61
Congratulations!
You have just reviewed and selectively altered and completed somewhat detailed exercises. These StoryTechs demonstrated some of the ways to involve group members in writing StoryTech exercises. In future, you may use these exercises as prototypes for your group, spinning off new exercises as they are needed!
62
63
64
65
Your CDC Futures presenter and guide will be: ___________________________________________ They will involve you in developing virtual CDC Futures through a process called StoryTech. StoryTech is based on positive future imaging developed at the level of the individual, then shared with the group. An information base of successful CDC Futures will be established during todays work. Based on this information, an analytical report will be developed and provided to you within ten working days. StoryTech assumes that stories have power. They can amplify and enhance: Human ability to change (personally and collectively). The ability of story tellers to influence others. The ability to efficiently and effectively effect change or reinforce understanding. Beliefs, understandings, worldviews and/or behaviors. Stories are the bases for social and personal construction of reality(s), and stories permit new knowledge production: New stories must be continuously generated to test and incorporate fluctuating knowledge and worldviews. Humans continuously reconstruct themselves by creating and testing new stories via deep structure/ deep process (using raw resources of dreams, intuition and internal dialogue). Personal stories and collective stories co-exist in reflexive relationships.
66
[The StoryTech facilitator] will rst discuss virtual CDC Futures in terms of added value, mission, vision and governance outcome goals. These same criteria will be at the core of todays future case history exercises, which actively involve the audience in creating successful anticipatory CDC Futures based on StoryTech. For the following reasons, we believe that story-telling about CDC Futures is both practical and responsible: Practical anticipatory CDC Futures can positively alter basic beliefs concerning what can be done, by whom, when and how. Responsible anticipatory CDC Futures can complete the loop between today and a desirable future, thereby reducing or eliminating the unreality of pie in the sky images that are isolated from the present. How will we create CDC Futures through the toolbox use of three interactive Reality Paradigms? This mornings presentation introduces three Reality Paradigms that can be used comfortably by education professionals. All three realities are in current use, but two are not well understood and are producing only a fraction of their potential value. Reality 1 is Everyday Reality. Everyday Reality is built up by sharing social declarations about what is real and down to earth. School grades are a good indicator of Everyday Reality, as are the unadorned senses of sight and touch. The skill base of persons operating in Reality 1 lies in enhancing concreteness and predictability, and reducing ambiguity and uncertainty. Reality 2 is Virtual Reality. Virtual Reality exists mostly in the minds of individuals. It is based on imagination and intuition, and exists as a kind of candidate for crossover into Everyday Reality. The skill
67
base of persons operating in Reality 2 lies in visions, metaphors, and enticement. Reality 3 is Blended Reality. Blended Reality is built up from the choices that can connect Everyday and Virtual Realities. The more blends, the more shared comfort in both Realities. The closer Virtual Reality is to Everyday Reality and its measures, the greater the likelihood of benecial and enlightening blends. The skill base of persons operating in Reality 3 is transformational, existing to build new Blended Realities out of combinations of Realities 1 and 2. These people may be called tomorrow makers. Gaining recruits for your CDC Two StoryTech exercises follow. They are designed to help you ease into the process of developing a Community Development Collaborative (CDC). It would be useful to begin with the Magic Cup exercise, and then lead into the exercises. These exercises should help break the ice and lead a number of people to become interested in moving toward participation in a CDC.
68
It is the afternoon of [date], about one year from now. You are talking with another person who is a volunteer in the Greatshakes Community. You are seriously considering becoming a volunteer yourself. Please describe exactly where you and the volunteer are carrying out your conversation. Are you indoors or out? ___________________________________________ What is the weather like today? ___________________________________________ What kind of clothing are you wearing? The other person? ___________________________________________ Why is the conversation between the two of you relaxed and friendly? ___________________________________________ Why is the volunteer so approving of Greatshakes Community? ___________________________________________ What impresses you, as a potential volunteer, about the other persons positive view of Greatshakes Community? ___________________________________________
69
You decide to become a volunteer. Your decision is based on how the other volunteer regards Greatshakes Community and on something about your own personal nature that you think Greatshakes Community will respond to and respect. What exactly is the personal characteristic that you feel Greatshakes Community will honor, and why does this help you make a positive decision about becoming a community volunteer? ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________
70
It is the evening of [date], two years from now. You have been a volunteer for the Greatshakes Community for one year. You are relaxing at home thinking about the relationship between Greatshakes Community and the rest of your State. Please describe exactly where you are relaxing and thinking on this evening. Are you indoors or out? ___________________________________________ What kind of clothing are you wearing? ___________________________________________ Why is the relationship between Greatshakes Community and your State working so well? ___________________________________________ What is it about Greatshakes relationship to your State that is very important to you as an individual? ___________________________________________ What is important idea now being considered within the community to improve the future relationship of Greatshakes to your State? ___________________________________________ Why are you personally championing this idea? ___________________________________________
71
Describe how your idea is being given serious treatment within Greatshakes strategic thinking and planning activities. ___________________________________________ Why are you therefore so condent that your idea will be given fullest and most respectful treatment by the Greatshakes community? ___________________________________________ Assuming that your idea is implemented, what would be the likely benecial effects one year later? ___________________________________________ Who are the most important beneciaries after your idea is implemented? ___________________________________________
72
DIRECTIONS: Please write carefully, so that the typist can efficiently transfer your contribution to disk. Use examples to illustrate your story. BACKGROUND: It is _____________[date]. You are preparing to leave your home to attend a CDC Directors meeting. Two workable opportunities for assisting CDC development were offered in your own StoryTech writing back on [date]. In just a few hours, you will leading a breakout group focused on one of your ideas, which has been under pilot development since the Spring of 2006. What are you wearing on the day of the [date] CDC Directors meeting? ___________________________________________ What kind of transportation moves you to the [date] CDC meeting? ___________________________________________ What kind of weather do you enjoy as you travel to the meeting? ___________________________________________ Back on ____________ [date], what were the two major ideas you came up with for the design of effective value-adding learning systems involving collaboration between ________________ & _____________________?
73
74
DIRECTIONS: Please write carefully, so that the typist can efficiently transfer your contributions to disk. Use examples to illustrate your story. BACKGROUND: It is now ____________[date], one year into the future beyond the [date] CDC Directors meeting. You have been involved in an assessment of the practicality and responsibility of your own idea. You are sitting at home preparing a written report. What kind of day is it? ___________________________________________ Which room are you sitting in? ___________________________________________ What are your wearing? ___________________________________________ Why are you happy with the contents of your report? ___________________________________________
75
You are working on the value-adding section of your report. What youve found is that your idea has considerably enhanced the rewards and prestige of the governance providers and customers who were affected by it. How did this come about? How Do You Manage the StoryTech Results Created by Your Volunteers? ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________
76
1. Imagine that the year is 20___. You are being interviewed on CNN. The subject is the city of Greatshakes. What do you say about Greatshakes that makes you the proudest? 2. By 20___, what is one specic vision for Greatshakes that you have seen developed as a successful pilot or experimental project? 3. By 20___, who have been the specic beneciaries of this vision as it was developed as a pilot or experimental project? 4. What would Greatshakes as a whole gain if this vision were developed as a successful pilot or experimental project by 20___? First, the CNN interview answers. Drawn from an actual CDC several years ago, they are very impressive for their pride and optimism. From the vantage point of the year 20XX, here is what the participants provided: Greatshakes is seen as a very progressive community; willing to spend money to better the community for its people. The good of the community does not take second place to special interests; people cooperate; and everyone is better off for it. Greatshakes put behind special interests. Several new large and small businesses are headquartered in Greatshakes; population has increased by 10,000. Greatshakes leads in food technology development and startups; leads in geriatrics in the Southeastern USA. The community is willing to work together to meet peoples needs. How far weve come in a short time! Greatshakes used all its talented and knowledgeable people; used skills and abilities; worked together to reach goals cooperatively. Greatshakes has had some troubled times; have put these behind and are working together as a total community; have employment opportunities; have a caring community. Greatshakes has overcome through tough times; cares about others; works together for the benet of each other and the community; is progressive; takes care of the elderly and the handicapped. Greatshakes has high employment; not too many people on welfare; excellent educational facilities; opportunities for graduates; an increased population; a better tax base; more services; beneting from the snowball effect. Plastic molding and assemblies jobs worked well to get people employed. Greatshakes people are hard-working; a strong base of Southeastern coping capacity; it is a good place to raise families. Greatshakes was able to deal with change; use change to its advantage without changing the fundamental characteristics of the community, which are its major strengths.
78
Greatshakes has an educational networking system that has been in place for a number of years, so that we are now able to compete within the global economy. Greatshakes has another 1500 kids in our school system, because theres another 1000 families in the trade area. They are the people who work and create value; contribute to the community. They are here because of the good jobs in Greatshakes. People are concerned, involved, and committed to Greatshakes and its development. A decade ago the community decided to Look Ahead. We did, and were very happy about it! Now were Looking Ahead to the next century, out to 2036. These responses show spirit and imagination!
A QUALITY education system; construction of a new high school. GREATSHAKES BENEFITS: Students; community in general, especially in regard to new industries wishing to look over Greatshakes; also good libraries. Going to attract more industries; more employees in town; better education and industries will allow more people to stay, and raise tax base. A new high school; opportunities to keep up with the modern technologies. GREATSHAKES BENEFITS: Youth; overall community; attract more businesses and a lot people that Hormel could be recruiting. Community would denitely grow; keep more graduates; nothing in Greatshakes right now. Becoming proactive about long-range education planning; need enthusiasm for education change; moving into the next ten years of consolidation and choice in education. GREATSHAKES BENEFITS: Regional impact of improved Greatshakes and surrounding communities schools. Economic development; jobs; sustain better balanced demographics, from standpoint of impacts of aging. Coordination of projected model of services for education on the growing edge of industry as the year 2000 approaches; may not be working out of discrete schools and colleges, but may need much more networking and coordination. GREATSHAKES BENEFITS: Entire community; provincialism has to go; cannot compete with surrounding towns; must help region to succeed. Resources: everyone would gain; attract industries; diversication of industry; better industrial base; more qualied work force goes hand in hand with above. 3. ROADS AND GROWTH PUBLIC SERVICES: A Master Plan for the roads of the community; a geographic look at Greatshakes; if it is to grow, where does it expand? What is that going to look like? Like now, only larger, or should there be changes? Does grid continue, or do we develop suburbs and other organizations?
80
GREATSHAKES BENEFITS: The people who live in Greatshakes, now and in the future. Greatshakes: to be in control of what it is to become, not to be victimized by it. Too many cities have uncoordinated, uncontrolled growth. Hang onto the small community character and charm as you become a larger system, if that is what is going to happen. Smaller cities have unique character; need to hang onto that. Infrastructure management gets out of control in larger cities. 4. GENERAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: More economic development. GREATSHAKES BENEFITS: Everyone would benet. Pump more money into economy; more jobs; help change reputation of the city. 5. COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT: Turn Greatshakes into a destination point on the map; capitalizing on the home of the XXXX company. GREATSHAKES BENEFITS: Entire community as a whole, but keying on retail, restaurants; motels and hotels; city revenue. Pride in community; expanded growth; dollars. Museum/retail outlet intended to serve visitors, not residents of Greatshakes. Mixture of shops and services; interest on part of Hormel in some kind of statement about their 100th anniversary; Cotton fest; begin to create an image of Greatshakes as a friendly destination recognized by a broader audience. LaJolla an example. Greatshakes has a moderately negative image, so need to create a positive, friendly image known 50-300 miles away. GREATSHAKES BENEFITS: First would be retail community--directly; indirect is total population; higher probability of jobs and industrial expansion. Long-term, broad approach to image--not just to create retail trade. Positive recognition by a great number of people. Boll Weevil Plaza Mall Project with seniors and park and recreation; come to fruition. GREATSHAKES BENEFITS: Seniors; youth; and business. Meeting the needs of seniors by being able to provide recreational activities and needed programs; youth would gain.
81
6. INDUSTRIAL PARKS: Hire manager--STOP WAITING--start businesses ourselves in buildings that are vacant in the industrial park; stop looking outside so much; need to search for product rather than the business; electrical assembly needs, for example; could put in benches, electricity, and begin to assemble various products for people. Not too much capital or training. Improve business and then sell it. GREATSHAKES BENEFITS: Employees and their families; do one and then start another; could grow to be quite large. Tax base; employment; additional income to wage earners. Both full and part time employment; teenagers; marrieds; still go to school; not too much training. New industrial park, called Rebel Farm; 200 acres; given by XXXX company; beautiful facility; need to develop it into high-tech complex to work with the food industry; XXXX Institute could get involved; could also look into medical developments. GREATSHAKES BENEFITS: Greatshakes economy; convention visitors; business; tax base; XXXX company. Stable employment, but may be a little risky project; help property tax picture; positive image for community. 7. GENERIC NEW INDUSTRIES: New industry or business that would employ all levels of employees from executive on down. IBM-type business, for example. GREATSHAKES BENEFITS: People of the community; people having good job opportunities available; fairly well paid like IBM in Boca Raton. Flex time, etc. Whole community should be involved, not just company people or townspeople separate from each other; need to work together. 8. FOOD INDUSTRY AND FOODS R&D: Food processing company or system. GREATSHAKES BENEFITS: Entire Greatshakes community would benet. Ability to develop a diversied business economy.
82
processing center. Tie it to experimental areas where new foods could be developed; genetic engineering, etc. GREATSHAKES BENEFITS: Good for jobs and economics of Greatshakes; help alleviate world hunger. Recognition in USA for its specialty; food of high caliber; wider economic base. Food Technology Field tied into the XXXX Institute; biotech, perhaps; genetic engineering, perhaps. Not necessarily that far out. Geriatric center for SE USA; germ is there. GREATSHAKES BENEFITS: Whole community would benet; one avenue to exploit commercial development. Lead from strength of XXXX Institute; biotech development in food arenas; could become Lipid Valley of country. Nucleus for businesses that could follow up on such advances. StoryTech integrates modes of being: Affective, subconscious feelings (affective, intuitive) Virtual visions and mental dramas Conscious thoughts (logos, rationality)
83
Tell your volunteers that theyve done great work, even though they may have barely started. Tell them how many of these projects look promising and need to be developed, and how many more similar and different projects must be in the background, just waiting to be noticed and developed.
84
85
86
87
88
What is the most important thing the graduate tells you about the likely employment outcomes of her/his education? ___________________________________________ What is the most informative message that comes out of this meeting for you, as a visitor from 2015? ___________________________________________ What is the most important message for your community? ___________________________________________ What is the most intriguing educational difference you notice between today and 2015? ___________________________________________ The most intriguing educational similarity? ___________________________________________
89
90
After this conversation you return to the present. Within a few seconds, you realize that there is a future for you in helping your communitys education. To make this future happen smoothly and productively, this is what you need to do: ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________
91
92
What did your community help do to help bring about the associations between your school and the service agencies, and to help make such associations occur all over all over your State? ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________
93
94
How was your group made aware of the Community Safety Zone Schools near where you live? ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________
95
What other agencies did the community collaborate with in developing its Home-School Partnership Program? ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________
96
What kinds of technologies help to facilitate the success of the Community Home-School Partnership Program? ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________
97
The rock and hard place of the data does not, however, appear to reside
in attitudes toward technology. Instead, there appears to be a divide between proponents of individually focused education and, by implication, the current [State] and national criteria for curricula and pedagogy as exemplied in No Child Left Behind. It would not be extreme to suggest that this difference may have social class associations of considerable import for [State] and the country. The majority of such implications might not be positive, especially for those watching from the sidelines as others rise to well-paying employment driven by the creative development and use of knowledge and innovation.
Of the problems faced by GSH in the year 2013, which one was still difficult to manage by 2015? ___________________________________________ Why? ___________________________________________ Looking backward from 2015, what changes were most important to GSH in comparison with 2013? 1. Vision: ____________________________________
2. Mission: ___________________________________ 3. Goals: ____________________________________ 4. Basic Approach to learners: _______________________ Why should GSH lead the development of individualized education between now and 2015? ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ Why should GSH not lead the development of individualized education between now and 2015? ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________
101
From your vantage point in 2015 you project the future of GSH to 2025. What is most exciting about that projection? ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ How can you and GSH begin to create your preferred 2015 and 2025 futures -- starting right now? ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________
102
tier of values identied by this question. Honesty, child-centeredness, child care, personal development, and preparing good citizens are second-tier values. The third tier of values is represented by qualied teachers, education for all, life-long learning, morale, openness, leadership, responsibility, pride, leadership, and hard work. Findings from Question #4. Of the problems faced by GSH in the year 2013, which one proved to be most easily managed by the year 2015? Student enrollment growth was by far the most often-mentioned easily managed problem, followed distantly by technology availability, overcrowding, attendance, space needs, tardiness, scheduling, and drug use. Findings from Question #5. Of the problems faced by GSH in the year 2013, which one was still difficult to manage by 2015? Chemical use, standards, and time and nance were the most frequently mentioned difficult problems, followed distantly by morale, change, preparing students for success, kids themselves, staff attitudes, teaching content and methods, and overpopulation. Findings from Question #6. Looking backward from 2013, what changes were most important to GSH in comparison with 2015? A. Vision: Preparing for the global marketplace was the leading response under vision, followed distantly by preparing for the technical world, the ability to change/looking forward; developing innovative thinkers, reducing control over students; and partnering with the community. B. Mission: Focusing on the individual was the leading mission response, followed closely by preparing students for the futures of work and living. These were followed distantly by encouraging lifelong learning; collaboration; technology availability; and creating positive learning environments. C. Goals: This item produced a very wide spread of low frequency responses, led by realistic learning and creating innovative learners. Successful teaching, continuous improvements, tech training, maximizing potential, and preparing for the future followed distantly. D. Basic approach to learners. The overwhelming response to this item was helping students to develop their individuality and outside the box thinking. Distant responses were fullling students needs,
104
diversity, technology use, more opportunities for students, more community focus, and more creative approaches to students. Findings from Question #7. Why should GSH lead the development of individualized education between now and 2015? The leading responses to this question were creating successful student futures; beneting, supporting and assisting children; community resources; responding to differences in children; teacher characteristics; and the social, demographic, and geographic situations of students. Findings from Question #8. Why should GSH not lead the development of individualized education between now and 2015? The leading responses to this question were money, available time, need for attitude changes; the absence of community support; and public and political resistance. Findings from Question #8. From your vantage point in 2013 you project the future of GSH to 2023. What is most exciting about that projection? The rank ordering of responses to this question was based on a wide spread of data. Individualization of education was the most often-mentioned future, followed by student centered learning; abstract ideas; helping students; global perspectives; making knowledge available to everyone; and the incorporation of technology. Many items received only one or two mentions. These may be referred to as emphases on work; family; community; pedagogy, curricula; staff factors; and educational paradigms. Findings from Question #9. How can you and GSH begin to create your preferred 2013 and 2023 futures starting right now? The rank ordering of responses to this question kicked off with four responses: taking risks; challenging ourselves to learn new technology; thinking outside the box; and becoming proactive. These were followed by enhanced department meetings; adopting a positive attitude; individual evaluations for each student; developing a student-centered philosophy; working with both the public and private sectors; and developing study teams to work with new ideas. What did you learn from reviewing this Storytech experience? We hope that you identied some interesting, practical ideas and potentials for your schools. We hope that you noted our method of codifying
105
data, even as we returned to the client each participants StoryTech on disk (all anonymously). In a moment, we will demonstrate how we coded data after a higher education StoryTech conducted at a national conference. Clearly, much can be accomplished during a very short time with StoryTech participants, even three hundred or so. But we have conducted StoryTech exercises with over nine hundred people (one exercise per day for ve days), and down to the single individual (for example, a CEO every other week for over one year). Reporting on a 2015 Storytech StoryTech is a method for exploring and rehearsing alternative futures. StoryTech can allow future scenarios to influence the past and present to examine how past, present and future interconnect. StoryTech focuses the participant on the future as a manageable place. One can preview futures before making decisions about them. StoryTech encourages and rewards positive thinking. It is very hard to write about a negative future when one is a productive part of the story! While story telling is as old as the hills, StoryTech modernizes the technique by allowing groups to experience virtual positive futures that they can record and share. The written StoryTech report resembles an enticing future history. As such, it builds upon affect as well as thought. One writes StoryTechs that are plausible, believable, engaging, sensible, and personally actionable.
106
Coded responses: C&I: Teaching students to be successful spec teachers. This interactive involvement and hands on learning. C&I: Attachment security training program for young mothers student driven program that can be entered after students take a certain course sequence that provides theory and practice information. Paradigm: Communication in the innovation age resources at the cyber. C&I: Technology studies program produces critical thinkers, not knowledge workers. Know how to use, evaluate, create and the technology and changes in the world around multidisciplinary C&I: A course. Virtual classroom. Students must be international mix. Object: humanities and writing knowledge and skill; applied project: Help a recovering county re-establish their government and culture often in civil war. Could be simulated or real. Paradigm: Topic: Use of technology to gain a competitive advantage. Asynchronous available 24x7, full motion, expert system, with knowledge bits adding to curriculum creating an ever-changing environment. Non-ending life long learning. C&I: A course in windsurng and poetry. Personal: I will be approved by my college as a faculty member, but I will not teach formal classes on the campus. I will work from my home office and tailor courses meeting individual learning outcomes through institutional outcomes. Paradigm: (Real outcome of all higher education). Developing global citizens. This program develops our human potential for ethical, en-
107
108
lightened participation in a global society. Graduates exhibit concern for the environment and well-being of fellow beings more than the acquisition of resources, material goods (including technology), power or status. Individuality and the common good are equally embraced by these graduates. C&I: Urban Tech students from urban ghettos, suburbs, rural areas join together living in the city and working to solve problems of the city. Use information from the whole world. Service: Expansion of our present student counseling services to a Life Support Center for students, faculty, employees and the larger local community that supports people psychologically, spiritually, socially, and physically (including family and group services). C&I: Worldwide, wireless learning cohorts groups of 30 perhaps who experience life and education in very different parts of the world, transmit their experience and their interpretation of it to the others in their group instantly for group processing. Paradigm: Global/spiritual/cognitive/without problem retrocaster/ resolver. C&I: Plays well with others. Global. Affective and social interaction/ collaborative knowledge base and skill base implemented at family and Pre-K through 6 as well as virtually accessible. C&I: Mentor/apprentice program. C&I: Engagement in and access to scholarly work. Paradigm: My campus is fully engaged with its constituency in interactive distance life long learning which extends the benets of Christian liberal arts learning throughout life. Paradigm: Fully developed and popular virtual university (Beth. Lutheran University) for Christian students anywhere in the world. Key component: each student spends 3 weeks on campus to get to know students/faculty. Emphasis on social aspects of courses. Report group: home schoolers and Christian educators. C&I: Music Industry Program. Paradigm: Lifelong University continuing general education for life open to our alumni (all 60,000 of them) offering what is new in the arts, sciences and humanities. Paradigm: The hybrid university that provides a base that builds on strengths but personalizing for students. More collaborative among faculty, students, institutions, builds foundation and integrates the lifelong learning and has the university a key player in that activity. Students develop learning contracts for degree. C&I: Nursing students receive the knowledge content via chips, if not implantable then hand held. Their patients have histories/past records in scanable forms Paradigm: A program enabling the integration of work, family and life
styles of graduates who desire to explore space and create space stations new colonies. C&I: Cultural performance studies students will learn to become experts in all arts with the aid of adjunct brains that turn impulses, fleeting ideas and whims into poetry, song, dance and dramatic performance.. All cultural production. C&I: Faculty and students are designing individual education plans. They rely on digital delivery of general education and the basics of majors leading to integrated research and seminars goal oriented. C&I: Program would study the classes of the western and non-western world to creativity and theoretical contemplation. Name: Semolia. Wisdom of the Past and its relation to a creative future. (The Greek word for it Leisure). C&I: An accredited degree program that is nearly all face to face collaborative self-directed learning, where each class is as different and particular as good wine. The class of 2012 was good at improvisation, but the class of 2015 wee the engineers. Service: Center for Citizenship and Learning. Paradigm: Interactive, implantable, electronic parenting modulator. Personal: A program that I am a catalyst for self-learning on an individualized-self paced basis (many disciplines as we know them) with an ability to allow learning, thought, and ideas to flow freely and intellectually. C&I: A holistic environmental program that incorporates aspects of astronomy, renewable energy, GIS Remote Sensory, Biology, Environmental Science and Culture. This gives the student a working knowledge of not only the biosphere, but our place in the universe. Service: Rural community renewal. Service: Develop set of health care programs (nursing, PA, PT, etc.) utilizing new technologies to make delivery of health care more efficient and effective and to produce innovative health care workers. C&I: Develop a cross-disciplinary undergrad/grad degree at our Art/Design college that features critical and creative thinking alongside art/ design. Paradigm: Research institute for (Dismantling Racial Disparities and Social Inequalities) -- The Universal Development of Individual Human Potential. Paradigm: Personality growth and development growing, autonomous, software articial personalities and tracking them into the work force. Service: Website sponsored by SDSU which invites persons involved in certain programs, events, etc. to submit their written reflections on the subject. Service: Personal and social development strategies.
109
110
Service: The program would utilize resources through the university to transform specic organizations (prot and non-prot), business sectors, or nations to adapt to changes within their environments. Students would be recruited to serve as program associates based on the capacities or abilities to help their program to succeed. Service: Health sciences curriculum that is interdisciplinary based on best practices of global cultures utilizing experts from around the world to dialogue, collaborate and share knowledge and innovations. Service: Interactive/involving retired people in lifelong learning. C&I: Personalized face-to-face (f-2-f) education, focusing on skills to supplement programs based on job opportunities. Service: All age access. Teaming with industry specialists to develop a constantly evolving suite of real-world applications. Employees take OJT at HE institutions along with traditional students preparing for workplace. C&I: Networking pre-college students higher education students so that both are teachers, learners and in arts and science ed and learning collaborators. Paradigm: A teacher development continuum (as opposed to a program) that engages students from high school through college in progressively experiential clinical activities essentially operating beyond the context of designated grades and merging book learning and teaching experiences with an on-going continuous development model. Paradigm: Students excited, actively engage, see a purpose beyond their school work, synergistic in nature, education program that can address ALL levels of learning where ALL coordination, planning is done together, flexible to move to technology. In this venue, even children and those considered a drudge of society will be permitted to state ideas, developed to interchange or intercommerce. C&I: Ethnobotany (eco medicinal science based on native plants) where students, elders, faculty and industry (pharmaceutical) harvest and analyze and promote wellness and good medicine for everyone. Service: Our classroom students have seamless, interactive, on demand connections (via technology) with people in workplace. For example, when they student visual design, they directly connect with people in the workplace who do the work. Yields discussions about theory and practice. Students experience actual practice; those in workplace acquire more theory. C&I: Develop online courses taught by successful retired professors, taught only during academic year. Use the expertise of these people. Develop a chip to draw my car from Minneapolis to wherever. Paradigm: The program helps people to nd meaning in living out of commitments our creator makes to us and out of commitments we
make to God and each other. Paradigm: A learning community that combines authentic insights into both engineering design and holistic aesthetic experience. Service: Continues JIT learning for school (K-12) literary/communication/resource on-site training management workers (formerly called school library media specialists). C&I: Break down the notion of a curriculum. Catalog of learning objects that students can choose from (without dependence on academic advisors) and that can add up to a meaningful whole. Students are both consumers (of existing knowledge) and producers (or new connections among ideas/knowledge ). This model has as its basis that creating connection among existing ideas to equally important as generating new ideas. Paradigm: Implantable, biodegradable transmit changes, cards respond informs of maladjustments. Paradigm: Fully encapsulated, packaged courses utilizing multiple technology including those not currently widely available. e.g. virtual reality marketable product purchase price would include link in some way to other learners in that area. Service: Creating bridges a program designed to foster collaboration between all elements of our community. Students from a variety of backgrounds serve others through programs they develop and implement. Paradigm: Admission/registration of a school entirely electronic. Paperless office with all communications/activities done electronically via palm tech mini wireless. C&I: Commune/farm living laboratory biology curriculum. Full immersion in the life sciences (BioDome U.) C&I: East Asian studies. C&I: This college offers free online tutorials (enhanced with video, etc.) that individuals work through to learn basics of accounting. Once an individual has a need to know more, they are directed to a similar group of people (online) to work with experts as they solve real problems. Service: Cultural Integration Specialists. Paradigm: Individualized education plan based on a career development prole of the individual. C&I: An online/distance learning performing arts degree and focus on jazz/rock/popular music and dance. C&I: Presenting Lakota history and language in order to a spiritual way of life. QUESTION 2: What role did you have in developing the program?
111
Coded responses: Leader: Did it. Supporter: Advisor/education. Advisor of students: within the program showing them how to market the program to target audiences and successfully implement. Educator: teaching theory and practice in the course setting. Leader: Expanded the standard communication program to include electronically enhanced interpersonal communication and later all other communication realms of the connected Sage: Who are the thinkers that might want to participate? Supporter: Facilitator and coordinator of participants. Leader: Founding Father and participant. Retreatist: Retired early when asked to Chair the Committee on Committees. Going on a windsurng trip with 20 forever students. We have that physical activity kept on winds from working very much and we could write poetry. We had paper and pencils. Leader: To help develop programs to help clarify individual learning outcomes in my particular eld and to work with other faculty members to assist the students to be competent in a variety of elds or majors. Leader: As a graduation program officer, funding, teaching and learning environments and experiences that allow both faculty and students to evolve in this direction. Leader: Part of a four-person development team. Leader: I created new ways of sharing ex Supporter: to development of experiences necessary for students to have to build those skills. Supporter: Collaborator on development team and cheerleader. Leader: I helped shape the structure (goals, methods, process) and some content though content can vary from to Supporter: Providing an infrastructure and easing access for users. Leader: I have encouraged to faculty to develop efficient easily accessible avenues for this interactive activity. Supporter: Consultant. Leader: Advisor, planner, coordinator, professor. Leader: Planning committee, grant-writer, instructor.
112
Supporter: Implementing, building on ideas of other looking for middle ground. Keep saying dont accept cant. Leader: Decide and update what goes into the chips. Leader: Leadership to integrate existing knowledge into program learning experiences, performance levels and assessment skills. Leader: Determined the balance of basics and research/seminar mix. The latter will incorporate community organizations, businesses and partner educational institutions (alumni). Sage: Knowledge of classical philosophy and literature. Leader: One of a group of 5 who started cohorts of experimental learning methods, and then worked with alumni to further develop. Leader: As faculty coordinator, engaged colleagues from across campus and beyond to identify how lifelong learning practices can be integrated in the curriculum. Sage: Idea person. Sage: Listening to others tell of developments virtually reading. Leader: I was an organizer/investigator getting people on board and helped develop some of the curriculum, especially astronomy. Supporter: Advisor facilitator instructor. Supporter: Developing some curriculum. Use of technology. Retreatist: Liberal studies messenger killed early in process by Fine Arts Faculty resistant to change martyr to innovation. Leader: I led an inter-disciplinary effort with social and cultural studies, political science, psychology, ethics, reconciliation studies and international studies. Leader: Schmooze local labor-busting industry organizations for funds, sell the vision of a workforce with no wages or benets. Sage: Adapting oral history techniques to a written form. Leader: One of the developers got money to create. Supporter: My role was in managing a transition program that created facilitative leaders who were able to change the paradigm of high education. Supporter: Provide technology necessary to facilitate learning and collaboration. Leader: Retired and volunteered to develop the program which is goal directed rather than degree directed. Sage: Skill development modules, stressing technology. Supporter: Participant. Leader: I would work with others to develop a plan developing goals and addressing both possibilities and problems at the outset. Leader: Part of a team of P-16 educators who envisioned new collaboration modules of learning development and delivery. Supporter: Facilitator of discussions coordinator preparation. Supporter: Finding elders to collaborate with biochem and botany
113
faculty who would buy in to collect or document the oral history with nature, plants and medicines. Leader: Proposed it and got approval. Coached faculty on how to teach within this new setting. First I worked with and learned how myself. Supporter: A small maintenance role. Leader: Coordinated efforts between departments of engineering, philosophy, art, music, theology and computer services to eliminate two-cultures) barriers. Leader: Courage modeling recognition of demand contacts providing case studies for examples. Leader: I got multiple academic institutions and corporations to contribute knowledge assets to the catalog. Leader: Conceived idea and networked device production. Leader: Designer. Leader: I helped launch. I recruited students and secured initial funding. Leader: Fund one/learn/try techniques/teach others how to incorporate. Leader: I donated $20 million to implement the program which was my brain-child. Leader: Design and implement. Leader: I convinced administrator this will work! Help write basics programs, line up experts for future problem solving and to market ideas to the community. Supporter: Mentoring, interpreting technology. Leader: I designed the prole and the assessments that help to dene the strengths, needs, talents, abilities and wants of the individual. Leader: Lead the curriculum development and participated in the team that prepared the technology for the curriculum. Leader: Cheerleader/organizer.
QUESTION 3: What were the major obstacles that were successfully overcome during program development and initial operation? Response coding groups: Culture Mechanics Resources Coded responses:
114
day to day operation. Mechanics: Marketing to appropriate audiences young moms often difficult to access. Encouraging young moms to participate. Culture: Resistance to change conceptual, philosophical and ethical. Inconveniences in technological progress and availability. Culture: The slow pace of change and traditional based thinking in the university structure. Culture: National pride and greed. Language: correct cultural, contextual interpretations. Culture: Faculty opposition. Traditional course based concept of a class having a beginning and an end. Resources: Finding large enough lake, waterproof pens and paper. Resources: Money for such individualized education. Culture: The tenure system, which continually reinforces the production of increasingly individualistic and isolated research on smaller and smaller topics; - Soft and Fuzzy. Cost of changing curriculum, credit systems. Culture Government: Threat to people who prot from current structure. Old ways of doing things. Resources: Finding a suitable building. Working out how it can be nancially viable staffing it. Culture: Biased Beliefs that people in different cultures have nothing to teach us or would not be interested in similar things. New way of wireless conferencing would be needed. Culture: Understanding global moods. Developing efficient work teams, and disciplines. Culture: Resistance to basic value of the knowledge of ourselves as foundation for all human social experience. Developing broad base of initial facilitators and virtual tools. Resources: Cost; fear of colleagues over less access to these students. Selling the vision and the expectations to more outside disciplinary lines. Resources: Costs. Negative attitudes of co-workers, students, etc. Culture: Faculty resistance to change, budgetary issues, creating the time for faculty to create learning opportunities. Fear of technology. Mechanics: Convincing educators, board, administration that this is a viable way to conduct Christian education. Mechanics: Rethinking program in 2003 so it t the needs of students, future of music industry in society. Had to convince music faculty this was the degree of the future. Needed to hire professionals in eld as adjuncts grants to purchase technology/software necessary for student preparation. Marketing program to students as viable major with exciting future (unlike performance/teaching). Resources: Money and time more faculty slots more support for
115
116
delivering content D.L. reassignment of time for current tasks. Culture: Culture, history policy, people, funding, resistance to change, fear. Mechanics: Buying high school or previous educators to begin this process so college could continue on. Organization of data so retrieval and utilization would be user friendly. Culture: Current habitual teaching learning relationships administrative control of resources perspectives on student learners faculty stratication. Culture: Will revert back to the local level as it was before the 20th century. The politics of territory and dependence on the traditional general education curriculum was overcome by the promise and allure of the individually designed learning plans and integrated faculty student research/seminars. Culture: Thinking that such a program has no Real World application. Thinking that one must always be forward looking and not recognizing the patterns immanent in the human condition. Mechanics: Recognition of the value of our graduates as certied, degreed, smart and capable. Recognition of the workability of our graduates employable, fundable, bondable. Buy-in from parents and conservative stakeholders. Mechanics: Break down barriers that majors/programs set up as the primary way students understand their education. The C+L focus challenged students to utilize a set of curricular/curricular practices to move from basic knowledge skills to new forms of knowledge creation and management. Mechanics: Technical wireless, implant, control. Ethical who decides whats right/wrong in , dollars. Mechanics: Institutional walls where the ones with the money, especially education were reluctant to let go of students and programs. Resources: Funding. Cultural/science conflicts. Articulation agreements with other institutions. Culture: Attitudinal logistical social barriers to innovation and change. Resources: Funding traditionalists in the eld approval process. Culture: Deep divisions between liberal arts and ne arts faculty erased. Support for student learning and enrichment was achieved across board. Valuing of teaching as important was made manifest. Culture: Resistance to this idea of elimination racial disparities as a desired priority of the institution. Marketing efforts to receptive audiences and determining who the audience is. Temptation to go for creative, expansive efforts (that unintentionally increase the divide between the privileged and the underserved). Culture: Opposition from reactionary faculty. Issue addressed by
working in secret. Articial personalities dont want to take Gen. Ed. Courses. They have to. Mechanics: Getting key people to agree to participate. Culture: Languages, cultures. Mechanics: Dismantling the current revenue engines and organization structures that have resisted basic changes in the paradigm. Marketing the new model to the beneciaries of the changed paradigm so as to create new revenue machines. Culture: Language, culture, spiritual beliefs, new health care practices, knowledge sharing and collaboration between disciplines. Resources: Startup funding, access. Mechanics: Vision development by school leaders. Salaries to retain talented faculty. Mechanics: Moving OJT from corporate operations to education operations. Having industry identify that they can benet from collaboration. Mechanics: State, local and institutional rules and control. Mechanics: Moving past well-established bureaucracies and related issues to nd new approaches to dene the roles and responsibilities of all parties, determining how to fund opportunities and in total removing articial barriers between levels of learning to create a true continuum of on-going teacher development. Mechanics: Policy limitations and class/race/cultural gaps. Mechanics: Elders are few and they needed to pass on their vast knowledge to those who would respect the earth and the Creator who put good medicine to help us. We also had to keep industry at a distance so that they would not take and patent the active ingredients. Culture: Disdain for the value of workplace knowledge, completely new way to teach, students accustomed to traditional classroom structure and unaware of workplace realities. Funding. Culture: A major obstacle was to counteract views that see human beings simply as matter without meaning and without relationships to a Creator. Culture: The lingering delusions that reality is nothing but matter and energy and that human consciousness can be reduced to information patterns (structured energy forms). Culture: Being taken seriously by administrators. Identifying and communication with potential students. Funding stagnant organizational demands. Gaining tenure while consumed with this possibly unrewarding task. My own fear of failing. Mechanics: Not having a standard protocol for collating knowledge assets from multiple sources. We develop one and assured its adoption.
117
Mechanics: Private information, dehumanizing no center. Resources: Wide availability of virtual reality hardware/ software. Making the product a social enterprise. Mechanics: Need to include other institutions in our city. Raising money to implement program. Overcoming racial prejudice. Reaching out to Native Americans and immigrant communities. Mechanics: Educating users in technology and dealing with resistance to impersonality. Mechanics: Convincing parents to send their 18 year olds to a 4 year spaceship on earth mission which would take the students out of mainstream living. Culture: Administrators vision. Culture: Resistance to change. Culture: Aversion to the technological world and its lack of affective values and cultural meanings. Culture: Challenged to nd innovative ways of understanding human personality, capability, and aptitude and projecting life options that match. Mechanics: Gaining university support. Gaining accreditation for the program. Financial support for (a) technology, and (b) faculty positions. (Faculty who can embrace the concept.) Mechanics: Finding people who already know the language and history human resources. Helping people see the need/value. QUESTION #4: What was/were the origin(s) of the resources necessary to begin the program? Response coding groups: External Internal External/Internal Coded responses: External/Internal: Grants, schools, colleges. External: Grant funding (e.g. NICHD). External: Willing, curious and colleagues all over the world. Existing infrastructure for digital communication. Alpha-level development companies looking for research, application and support of their products/services. External/Internal: Blood, sweat, tears and support from B&I. External: Ind. Access to people with cosmos accessibility. Somebody needs to pay somebody for the service. Perhaps a barter system.
118
UN Rebuilding Fund. External/Internal: joint industry academia project. Internal: Paper, pencils, windsurng equipment. The collapse of traditional learning prompting innovation and reallocation of college resources, i.e. money. External/Internal: Challenge grants from philanthropy. Student movements their desire, need to help create a world they want to be part of. Corporate support, once business realizes the advantage of a world at peace rather than war. Internal: An organizational dedicated to changing the life in the funded. External: Grant money. School personnel providing vision and leadership. External: Someone will come up with the means of contact soon. Someone sets up the contact website where interested learners could join. External/Internal: People, time, technology, vision. External: Gates Foundation grant. Private industry donations. Internal: Human nding colleagues willing to be mentors and colleagues willing to support the program see it as viable and worthy. External: State dollars allocated by the state legislature. External: Schwann Foundation. External: Latest technology given to university by music industry tech companies who desired graduates to ll more and more openings with their business. Recent grads available as adjunct faculty demonstrated it was possible to be successful through this degree at this university. Internal: Desperation cutbacks, retirement led to crisis and forced new thinking. Internal: A means of importing content or knowledge, storage and outcome in various forms that could be individualized for each situation. External: Private sector international business personal wealth. External: Cultural corporations will violently oppose this leading to bloody culture wars that rival the world wars of the 20th century. External: Digital delivery technologies. Existing (and developing) academics. Business partners. External: Wealthy business tycoon who recognizes the value of creative leaders and not middle class External: Small grant of money. Gathering of a group of people willing. Incentive (crisis or need). Internal: Abolish majors and create new learning pathways across the college curriculum develop partnerships with local and national government education and business players to create learning/teach-
119
120
ing internships. External/Internal: Parenting knowledge research. Ethical decision makers. Electronic implant in parent and child. External: Business leaders who are visionaries with money, of course. External: Planning grant funded by NGF/TCOP/NASA. Finding talented and enthusiastic staff to plan and implement plan. External: Local government in concert with national government scally, the pulse of the community. External: State and grant funding along with industry contributions. Internal: Faculty administration student collaborations. Re-energizing of faculty and administration. Clarication goals of school/role of art design in society. External: Pew Grant. Internal: Quantum computers invented, software written by underemployed, part-time post-secondary faculty. External: Local and institutional. External/Internal: Personnel and money. External: A struggling economy, a lack of certainty/condence about the future. A world increasingly troubled by inequities in income/resource distribution. External: Grants, endowments, health care industry. External: Private funding of individuals, tech companies, retirement communities. External/Internal: Fund raising campaigns (every ve years approximately). Faculty development for lower paid faculty. Dont know how to pay adequate salaries - Powerball! External: Private funding. Internal: Resource inventory, resource sharing, resource development. External: Reallocated public funding. New models or roles responsibilities that changed how/who is paid for what work and removing all from the location of program development and delivery. Internal: People willing to come together. Openness to meet in homes. (No money exchanged getting to a trust economy) Creativity/inventors willing to test ideas/research basics. External: Grants contributed the seed money and volunteers who shared the vision and oral traditions contributed the knowledge necessary to preserve native plants and not let the industry take this knowledge in order to produce expensive drugs available only to a few. External: Overcome industry issues of condentiality. Resistance to change, reluctance to see our degree having an applied aspect. Internal: The origin of resources is Gods revelation to us in the Bible. Internal: Commitment to a set of fundamental beliefs: 1) humans are
nite creates, 2) reality has meaning only in relation to its Creator, 3) hubris free service is central to ideal core of human being. External/Internal: Grants. Innovators on faculty, who went out on limb and came up with the ideas wrote application with compensation or recognition. External/Internal: Academic knowledge capital. Corporate knowledge, funding, project management. Government funding. External: Nano-technology ability to create in communication at nano level. Internal: On-line courses; all technology now available incorporating multi-media. Financial resources. External/Internal: Grant funding for our pilot program and administrative support. Active participation by a co-host group of students. External: Resources = problem cost. External: Disconnection of individuals in our society with the biological world and the catastrophic societal effects (natural). Internal: Schools support. Internal: Time (release of people from the work they now do). Commitment and encouragement of whole institution. Re-allocation of money. External: AIHEC + Kellogg + Mellon +NSF grants. External: Grants from businesses that want to invest in workforce and leadership development. External: A number of grants: education and arts grants. Campus IT. Financial support (and other support) from businesses in music industry. External/Internal: Elders, speakers. Technology people.
QUESTION #5: What organizational lessons were learned in developing this successful program? Response coding groups: Reperspectival Restructural Reprofessional Coded responses: Restructural: Collaboration between different groups. Reperspectival: Students can be very successful in the design, implementation, and functioning of a program, but need accessible faculty advising. Restructural: The walls are coming down slowly but surely. The new
121
122
evolution changes society and concepts of well-being just as the printing process or the television. Open (digital) university prevents resistance to change from influencing outcomes destroys ethics. Restructural: That [college?] is not a learning organization. Reperspectival: Education must understand that the course/semester model is very wasteful. Restructural: Course didnt work in English or Phys. Ed departments and nally became a requirement for majors and economics, physics, philosophy and classics. Restructural/Reprofessional: Less need for administration/ administrators and more need of dynamic innovation on the part of the professor and collaboration with the professors. Reperspectival: Changes can occur as a result of horric world events catalyzing people to thing, we have to do better than this or never again shall we allow x, y or z to happen. Reperspectival: Ghetto people do not approach problems in the same way as institutional moles. May be more inventive and creative. Reperspectival: Collaboration, cooperation, negotiation, compromise. Reperspectival: Learning groups need autonomy, but need to learn how to develop and encourage leaders too. Learning would be lifelong, but groups might want to dissolve/reform regularly. Restructural: Importance of leadership buy-in. Broad research support base. Restructural: Market, might, can make or break valuable change manage individual and organizational needs in development and implementation. Reperspectival: The importance of collaboration and the willingness to provide resources. Reprofessional: Would no longer stay with full professor paradigm needed many adjuncts, volunteers, real world situations, apprenticeships. Need to work more closely with music businesses in re-designing major and requesting help with hardware technology software to keep current. Reperspectival: Desperate times call for desperate measures. Restructural: Communication initially and throughout were essential to success and progress. Be open try things and learn from successes and failures actively involve the customer. Clearly articulated vision essential to getting started. Get the key players together early and often. Reperspectival: Find out what has been developed and can be collaborative, so dont re-invent anything. Reperspectival: Technology drives social change. Current curriculum development has assumptions that do not correspond to future learning needs.
Reperspectival: The possibilities and promise in designing research and seminar learning built on a foundation of basics and development into a community of faculty and students will overcome resistance the allure. Reperspectival: One must be always looking back as well as forward. Restructural: Way to grow participation in group from NEWBE to worker to administration to leader to advisor to curmudgeon. Reperspectival: Our systems logics are more closely linked and that systems logical translation was technologically feasible. Reprofessional: Project management/operational. Team work decision making. Monitoring/evaluation. Restructural: Trust and allowing communication in a flat level of organizational structure. Give up turf and letting leaders develop without stopping at structure. Reprofessional: Faculty/staff need free time to work on project so class loads need to be reduced and project time funded, probably by a grant. Reperspectival: Be well advised, prepared and patient. Reperspectival: Creating an atmosphere of change. Achieving cooperation from people in different disciplines. Reprofessional: Need teamwork. Willingness to work. Commitment to long term. Idealism a must. Risk-taking necessary. Faculty administration student collaborations. Re-energizing of faculty and administration. Clarication goals of school/role of art design in society. Reperspectival: Global views are essential, so broadly shared knowledge. Collaborative with local, national and international policy groups. Reperspectival: Whatever it is, theres plenty more where it came from. Reperspectival: Need to limit focus, both in terms of people and the matter covered. Reperspectival: Creating different levels. Reperspectival: They are old lessons viewed from a new context. Form follows function (and dictates outcomes). Necessity drives innovation. Innovation responds to opportunity. Restructural: International relationship building, partnering with industry, efficiencies gained by use of technology, change management. Restructural: Resistance from traditionalists that opposed students teaching as participants would. Also be utilized as teachers when appropriate. Reperspectival: Need for think tank approach inclusive and open. Reprofessional: The signicant contributions (resources) of each group must be nurtured. Everyone needs a sense of ownership. Reperspectival: The extent of shared knowledge and experience. The extent to which students can be full participants in/contributors to
123
learning/teaching. Reperspectival: How meaningless and limiting previous segmenting of learning has been. Restructural: Participants need to be on board with ideas. Constant reflection on what the learning community hopes to achieve/relationship to the world/social responsibility, etc. Reperspectival: One must respect the knowledge gained and the power of nding easily available medicine from being taken away by those who see only the money to be made. Reperspectival: If youve said it would be great if we could Figure out how technology can help you do that. Go for it. Restructural: Whole person-to-person contact is needed, at least to some minimal but signicant extent, for true learning and development to occur. Reprofessional: Whats in it for me? Needs to be addressed on. Reperspectival: Students make more supportive life style choices. Reperspectival: The campus as we know it must change form. Global interconnectedness. Restructural: Be flexible, plan will change. Get a good people person on board early. Create a climate of share investment. Reperspectival: Start with one level, then proceed. Reperspectival: That we all live in full immersion of the biological world, regardless of whether we acknowledge that fact or not. Reperspectival: Dont change! Reperspectival: We can maintain cultural values in the face of an increasingly technological world. Reperspectival: We learned to work with futurist to monitor workforce trends thus producing a better match with career direction. Restructural: The development of successful communication between instructor and student requires careful thought. Reperspectival: Developing the /college/intergenerational framework so it can be replicated by other countries. QUESTION #6: From the viewpoint of your situation in 2013, what program development advice would you give to our members back in 2003? Response coding groups: Aphoristic Incremental Transforming Coded responses:
124
Transforming: Be creative when addressing parochial social issues. Aphoristic: All progress is powered by evil - , pride and greed Keep that in mind. Individualism in the digital age may erase ethics, honesty, trust and wipe the borders of security from the map at reason. Aphoristic: Slow persistence. Small wins. Incremental: Administration allow alternate delivery methods with incentive based compensation. Aphoristic: Enjoy your students. Dont think all the time. Hang around with people in the departments. Cell phones are ruined by water damage leave them home when you go windsurng. Aphoristic: Dont be a trident of tradition. Aphoristic: Get faculty and students out of the classroom and into third world countries and areas of poverty (urban & rural). Transforming: Dream big. Set goals in one year incremental steps. Aphoristic: Keep working at encouraging independent learning in students. Keep encouraging collaboration across distances. Aphoristic: Expand vision, learn the needs that societies have, and spend time to think about what is coming. Aphoristic: Follow your dreams and your heart. Talk, collaborate, inspire. Aphoristic: Classical educational can be recongured. Think outside the box. Transforming: Help us understand how to bear the burden of budget decits as the rich get breaks and we carry the burden of state education. Why are higher educators responsible for the decits in state budgets and the federal budget? And get out of the way to allow experts the opportunity to do what they do best. Transforming: Ability to think outside box crucial to future success. Flexibility with hires crucial instead of dependence on full time faculty not able to stay current if moved from another area of expertise. Spend time with those in business before setting up arbitrary course requirements. Include experiential education as part of requirements in place of some classes/or as replacement for classes now done in classroom. Aphoristic: The crash of 01-07 lasted longer than anyone thought it would. Aphoristic: Think outside the box. Focus on the needs of user. Aphoristic: Need to work with innovative people. Transforming: Well nance this with prots from our professional football program. What will we loose by not having students grapple with learning an art from the ground up? Will we loose the soul of the arts, or will the innovation always progress upward from where they start? Will there be meta-innovators who develop innovation algorithms that are then distributed to others? Perhaps that will be the
125
126
new product not cultural performances, but cultural innovation that we implemented to create local performances. Aphoristic: Understand what technology can do to free faculty and students to create new knowledge. Transforming: Project a future and plan accordingly (i.e. what will peoples jobs look like in 10-20 years?) Transforming: Create avenues for faculty, administration and students to understand the college as a full-fledged learning community. Only when all participants are engaged in a life-long learning practice can students unleash/develop their best potential and be empowered to excel as well as adapt. Aphoristic: Think big. Aphoristic: Get a life! life long learning is not only for students. Aphoristic: Start now and think long term. Evaluate often or make changes as necessary. Use the ideas and visions of students. Aphoristic: Expect change to occur but strive to set aside and eliminate barriers seemingly insurmountable. Transforming: Be willing to accept and lead change and innovation. Incremental: Have to establish a focus. Figure out how to build collaboration in institutions. Look at who your students are now and why? Work across hierarchical lines. Transforming: Resist the temptation to spend resources mainly on strategies that enhance the lives of the privileged. Focus on creative strategies that serve the needs and potential of the underserved. Aphoristic: Pay attention to the partnership agreement. Aphoristic: Be prepared for the unexpected. Aphoristic: Open up to all ages. Transforming: Breakdown current structures that natural adaptation to a world. Work across borders/boundaries. Transforming: Start building relationships with industry and international experts. Continue to nd ways to expose students to issues/ environment that they will go into in their professions. Become innovators in how to make a better health care system. Start building an endowment. Creating interdisciplinary curriculum. Transforming: Conrm the market and go for it. Transforming: Seek open input from broad cohort of faculty, etc. into strategic planning. Incremental: Repeat this exercise every year. Incremental: Foster more opportunities to engage students and educators at all levels in the work of discussing and improving teaching and learning. Aphoristic: Community is the essence. Aphoristic: Look to the needs of people to enjoy good health and wellness as they live longer. As knowledge through technology is
available to all, so should this. Aphoristic: Maintain a vision of technology as human culture formation which needs direction. That direction must come from sources that transcend technology. Aphoristic: What do you have to loose? Act on good ideas or be irrelevant along with much of the aging higher education structure. Transforming: Instead of trying to create products that we think are relevant to the students lives (work, personal, intellectual) let them decide what is relevant. Empowered consumer/producers. Students are both consumers (of existing knowledge) and producers (of new connecting ideas/knowledge assets). This model has as its basis that creating connections among existing ideas as equally important as generating new ideas. Transforming: Engaging of and engagement by students in innovation. Transforming: Envision a global campus. Think of courses as products/ marketable. See in multiple dimensions. Aphoristic: Act on your ideas, dont be paralyzed by fear. Aphoristic: Start small, but think BIG! Diversity participants be as inclusive as possible. Aphoristic: Dive in! Start now! Be open to change! Aphoristic: There is still a role for family and community in the world to come. Incremental: Be certain to develop a diverse and adequate pool of business connections that can serve as eld experience or apprentice opportunities similar to internship experiences. Incremental: While delivery systems change.
127
128
129
130
131
dictably. (Accordingly, smart organizers are moving from management to networking models.) Information and knowledge are resources forged out of chaos and turbulence. Information is a social resource -- ideas and beliefs shared within the group. Knowledge is a personal resource -- ideas and beliefs yet to be shared within the group. (Accordingly, smart providers are tapping the minds of providers and customers, searching for shareable cultures.) The effective management of change is the result of bringing information and knowledge together -- of interfacing these two resources for the benet of the organization and the individual. (Accordingly, smart innovators are tapping the behaviors of providers and customers, searching for shareable climates.) StoryTech is a personal imaging and narration process designed to assist individuals and groups in the design of productive connections and blends between: Information and its real health services worlds, and Knowledge and its virtual human services worlds. Real and virtual health services worlds demonstration through the Virtual Cup. This demonstration will illustrate that: The creation of potential is the result of bringing together --interfacing-- two culture-and-climate realities: those forming real worlds and those forming virtual worlds. These worlds, driven by social information and personal knowledge, are the basic resources for use in formulating new health services to consumers, and putting these to work effectively.
General implications for you as a community resident Introduction to the storytech process, and how it relates to the three factors and to you and your community. Many reasons to be optimistic: volunteerism and many other forms of societal contribution are beginning to compete with wages and salaries as major indicators of individual performance and quality of life. Realization that jobs and income are quite recently arrived indicators of personal value and performance, and by no means capture the whole, healthy persons full self-denition -- and potential. Rapid growth of technological obsolescence and rapidly outdated job descriptions. Massive labor shifts in the wake of international competition, recessions, and changing demographics. Irrelevance of formal education to many changes in jobs, living, marriage, personal health, self-esteem, and the quality of life.
132
Resultant explosion in experimentation and choice, including living between the boundaries of society instead of living out pre-determined roles that are often depressing and even deadly. Uncovering of health ndings that strongly suggest immune system depression is caused by the chronic low self-esteem often accompanying life in wage-and-salary rat races. Rapid growth of holistic volunteer assistance -- helping the whole person, not just the job holder/loser, or the chemically dependent, or the heart-damaged.
133
134
You think for a minute, and say Yes, thats true. And I think this MISSION CHANGE can begin to benet MY COMMUNITYs health services customers immediately, because: ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________
135
1. ________________________________________ 2. ________________________________________
136
1. ________________________________________ 2. ________________________________________ 3. ________________________________________ How has each of these THREE KEY HEALTH SERVICE OPPORTUNITIES paid off handsomely for services to customers and to your COMMUNITY over the past three years?
Your colleague agrees, saying that The nearby communities arent the only ones getting interested in what we did. Look at whats happening in: ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________
138
139
You and your colleagues agree on three reasons why LINE BUDGET ITEMS must be signicantly restructured. What are they, and what makes them important?
140
Specic implications of these changes for the eld of aging and for the aging themselves: The VLC paradigm (Vitality, Longevity, and Contribution) Specic implications for you: Seeing birth and death, aging, and time itself as increasingly under the control of our attitudes and values: helping people understand that Americans are living nearly twice as long as only 100 years ago, and may live nearly twice as long as today within fty years. Seeing the world of aging as inside us, and under our management, instead of outside us and beyond our control: helping people to see that each of us is the world -- we can only see what we can see, and we can selectively change our perceptions about services to the aging. Re-connecting mind, matter, and personal health: helping aging people and their industry professionals reestablish their organic and spiritual realities. Stressing the wholeness of the individual, instead of playing roles: helping people to have a heart toward themselves as aging individuals -or professionals in the eld of aging- instead of just carbon copies. Thinking dynamically instead of statically -- creating useful change instead of resisting the future: helping the aging person or the professional in the eld become an architect of positive changes. Boundary thinking instead of right and wrong thinking -- taking charge of thoughts instead of being victimized by them: helping people see that absolute thinking is extremely stressful, if not to us, then to those who live around us. Establishing healthy new networks among the aging and their professional associates: helping the burned out and the cynical professional to reconnect to the joy of growing the future of aging along with others, including the aging themselves. Implications for community futures through you as you: Act to enhance participation in life for the aging. Act to enhance the dignity of life for the aging. Act to enhance self-control over life for the aging. Act to enhance life quality for all who are associated with the aging phenomenon. Act to reduce preventable economic, personal and social costs associated with aging. Act to make the future look more inviting and joyful as a productive place and time to create and reside in for the aging and their profes-
141
sional associates. Act to enhance immune system supports through wellness and prevention methodologies. Act to expand healthy role models for the aging and their professional associates. Act to promote healthy and growthful spiritual choices for the aging. Act to reconnect spirit-body-mind among the aging and their professional associates.
142
Has anyone else copied this behavior? ___________________________________________ How has it worked for them? ___________________________________________
144
145
The article is very congratulatory about your community. The article says that your community introduced a major change in the way its aging services were structured, and that this change has made your community the best of its kind in America. What was the most important decision that had to be made to allow your community to become the best of its kind in America? ___________________________________________ What else does the article say about your communitys services for the aging? ___________________________________________ Why does reading the article please you so much as an individual? ___________________________________________
146
147
As you think about the vision statement that actually emerged back in [date], you reach down and pick it up off your lap, where it has been resting. What does it say, and what were the steps that produced it? ___________________________________________ How were the steps carried out? ___________________________________________ What was different about this vision from prior visions of aging? ___________________________________________
148
149
Aging was no longer a popular subject; national and local attention was changing to childrens issues. You reflect on these issues with amusement. They were all overcome handily before 2025. All of this progress in staving off the negative aging futures could be traced to a handful of interlocking perspectives and actions. This was primarily due to leadership coming from your community!! What were these perspectives and actions? ___________________________________________ Who invented them, innovated them, and got them underway so successfully? ___________________________________________
150
151
What should they avoid? ___________________________________________ What are the payoffs for following your advice? ___________________________________________
152
153
154
the possible applications for those technologies. Gained an understanding of the power and utility of decision-making software on complex development issues. Developed an understanding for StoryTech scenario planning, how and when it may be an effective tool. Generated their own StoryTechs with a vision for how to apply emerging technology to their own development context. Engaged in global conversations about development issues that concern them. Developed networks of professionals across sectors and regions. Scenario #1 The rst scenario will be by topical sectors identied by the Humphrey Fellows. The sectors are: Environment and sustainable development Governance, democracy and civic engagement, ethics Education Human rights Health Law and justice Finance [No Report]
Scenario #2 The second scenario will be by geographic regions identied by the Humphrey Fellows. The regions are: East Asia Europe and Central Asia Latin American and Caribbean Middle East and Northern Africa North America South and Southeast Asia Sub Saharan Africa
___________
Introduction Welcome to the rst Humphrey Fellowship Global Symposium! We are excited for the next two days together, and we look forward to your contributions. There have been many updates to our symposium blog in the last few days. Most notably, the Recommended Readings have been updated to include
155
the reference works of our symposium presenters as well as the notes from their speeches as they have become available. Here is an overview of the symposium process. Steps for remote participation: 1. Visit the symposium weblog http://blog.lib.umn.edu/chri1010/symposium/and the symposium website www.hhh.umn.edu/innovationstrategies. 2. Register as a remote symposium participant at IFP@hhh.umn.edu if you havent already. This is not required, but recommended as we can then ensure you receive all the advance reading materials for the symposium. 3. Read the symposium materials. A description of StoryTech scenario planning is already available. Speaker notes will be available shortly before the symposium. The rst StoryTech will be posted or e-mailed to you in advance. 4. Post your response to the rst StoryTech by 12:00 noon CST (central standard time). 5. Review the small group summaries and add your comments (between 5:00 p.m. April 8 and 10:00 a.m. cst April 9). 6. Post your response to the second StoryTech by 10:00 a.m. cst April 9. 7. Review the small group summaries and add your comments (summaries will be available by 3:00 p.m. cst). 8. Check back with the weblog after the conference to see what steps have been taken for continuing the dialogue. Very shortly, we will be posting the rst StoryTech, which all participants will be completing on Friday. To familiarize yourself with the process, you may want to read About StoryTech and Say Hello to StoryTech, which is a PowerPoint presentation. After you have completed your StoryTech, we ask you to post it on the blog along with your country and sector affiliation (please choose from the following list: education, health care, democracy and civic engagement, law and justice, environment and sustainable development, human rights, and nance). There will be a post established precisely for this purpose. Simply click on the Comments link to leave your StoryTech.
___________
Whats Your Personal Vision?
156
Before starting StoryTech, take a moment to consider your own vision. Whats your vision? ___________________________________________ For your country or region? For humanity? For yourself and your family? For all of the above, combined?
157
Describe the barriers that had to be overcome regarding the implementation of these technologies. What were the key practical barriers, such as: infrastructure, policy, capacity to obtain nancing, the knowledge base, installation, training, and maintaining the technologies? ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ How did you overcome these barriers? ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________
159
What types of technology were employed? Data sharing technology Chemical engineering Urban forestry/urban planning (road engineering/materials, sensors) Vehicle alternatives (fuel, materials, electric, + Biotech) Power (sun, generators, hydroponics) Economic model advancements (rebalance with natural resource values) Energy efficient electric artifacts Biotech (General) Precision application farming on farm water quality monitoring renewable energy (cold fusion, wind, etc) Intelligent transport systems Marketing innovation (social) use of media In-eld time released chemicals Increased efficiency + complex sustainability + balance What elds were represented? Environmental sustainability Poverty Public Transport (urban) Global warming (CO2) Water Quality Natural resources (crisis) Energy Air pollution (urban vehicles What barriers to implementation were encountered? Lack of expertise/resources/political conservativism/atttudes Current denitions of success Lack of funding Entrenched interests (economic/political/ideological) Inertia Assimilation of information How were the barriers overcome?
Articulation of need for change. Resistance to change Bringing stakeholders together + dissemination (sharing outcomes)
Awareness Developing appropriate chemical principles Skyrocketing energy prices, unemployment, drop in income in developed countries Wider public participation and development Thanks to George Kubik for facilitating the discussion and transcribing the group summary. Democracy and civil engagement group summary 1. 2. 3. 4. What types of technology were employed? Information systems and training E-government (law, licences, taxes) Information systems of libraries Liberalization, more access to internet What elds were represented? Government services (civil service, judiciary, etc.) Libraries, universities Schools Private sector, Non-prots The media What barriers to implementation were encountered? Bribery or Gift-giving? Nepotism, cover-ups Psychological barriers Fear of technology, especially by the older generation Red tape lack of clear procedures Older generation vs. younger generation (gen. gap) Imposed lack of education (lack of access) Lack of access to nancial resources How were the barriers overcome? Strict enforcement of rules and laws regarding conflict of interest Public awareness through media effective media Determination of the new generation willingness to make changes Protection of whistle-blowers Training of auditors, accountants to spot corruption Leadership committed to ghting corruption
161
Thanks to Christine Swanson for facilitating the group and to Shehryar Sarwar for transcribing group notes. Education group summary 1. 2. What types of technology were employed? Virtual libraries Virtual reality (to envision elds to increase bang for buck) Webcam Move to cost-effective travel options (e.g. pr campaigns) What elds were represented?
Higher education workforce develop access international student numbers International NGO - girls education Teacher at secondary school (technical) in SSA 3. 4. What barriers to implementation were encountered? Increased competition Reliability of education services Accessibility Credibility of providers Connecting action to technology Getting information out there through technology Insufficient resources, malfunctioning system Maintenance to infrastructure Power (etc., etc.) Financial resources (capacity building) Understanding (acceptance of technology) Social traditions (e.g., girls) Shortage of technicians, teachers How were the barriers to implementation overcome? Updating regulations and policies Increased capacity of institutions to adapt Privacy concerns, such as sharing data Concern about viability of outcomes Needs assessments, etc, workforce-ready skills, customized curricu-
162
lum Technology a solution? Access through satellites (global communication at lower costs) Energy sources attained Minister of Education in SSA (Horn of Africa) Consultant in Thai Ministry of Education to strengthen business, health care education (linkages) Tools to address the cost of access Access to information aided the reduction of some barriers, fostered creativity, etc. Nationwide investments in teacher education (student centered approach) Introduced solar power Provided mobile phones, internet Radio/tv education programing (domestic programming & international) Training of technicians & teachers about technology
Human rights group summary 1. 2. 3. What types of technology were employed? Communications hardware and software Telecommunications Cell phones Computers and CDs (to substitute for books) Online classes and discussions What elds were represented? Access to education for women Access to higher education Access to information National policy What barriers to implementation were encountered?
Religious institutions (especially attitudes towards women) Legal systems (hard to change) Lack of education Lack of nancial resources Resistance to change in standard-setting organizations (e.g., World Bank and IMF) Attitudes
163
Difficulty of convincing governments to support and fund Need for infrastructure Need for Training 4. How were the barriers overcome?
Women as vehicle of implementation (e.g. micro-projects where they rent out cell phone time) Legal system could facilitate (if changed) Develop national planning Move from national to global focus for analysis distribute national reports worldwide. Health group summary 1. What types of technology were employed?
Vaccines Wireless /Laptops For education and certication of local health care workers For assessment and diagnosis A distributed medical assessment, sensing, monitoring, health management information system. Storytelling Vending machines 2. What elds were represented?
What barriers to implementation were encountered? Infrastructure Belief Systems / Attitudes / Conflict Money Governance / Control Vaccine development How were the barriers overcome?
Increase buy in, adoption and availability by using gains realized in preventing full onset of medical conditions
Established a Vision Engaged key constituencies Anonymity through design Collaborate Be inclusive Developed local innovations to fund some local work, e.g. water purication Joint partnerships and federated approaches between government and organizations. Training of everyone in the initial organizing groups into the technologies and in turn they train another group of people and so on especially at the local level Law and justice summary 1. What types of technology were employed?
Increased telephone (cellular) and personal computer and access to Internet Village cell and computer cooperative with hot-line to link for help Cities offering free wireless connection to everyone Using the computer as cell phone to get rid of cost (I.E. SKYPE) Improved in Health care systems Cheaper medicine and drugs and treatments Decreased Environmental Equipment polluting air, water, and land Improved Transportation and Roads to decrease congestion and have lower tolls 2. What elds were represented?
Transportation/Civil Servant (Brazil) PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Mayor (Argentina) POLITICIAN Senior Law Enforcement Officer in Private Sector (Pakistan) CIVIL RIGHTS Advisor of Development organization in National or International org. (Bangladesh or other country) - HR ACTIVIST Project Manager for NGO in Environmental Protection (Australia) Appellate Court Judge (Sierre Leone) - LEGAL/CIVIL 3. What barriers to implementation were encountered?
165
Access to information and training Environmental Pollution High human rights violations and lack of condence in legal, political, economic, and social systems 4. How were the barriers overcome?
Improved distribution of wealth by revisiting Developed leadership skills through training to use phone and computers Improved access to credits and grant for technology access (women access to telephone and computer) to improve business skills Established exchange conversation between judges Educated and sensitized judges and law enforcement to change attitudes Connected cars via a satellite which regulated congestion, so traffic jams will be non-existent and tolls were lower.
166
Collaboration #3: ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ Successful because: ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ What were the barriers to procurement, implementation, and adaptation that were overcome? A. Procurement: ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ B. Implementation: ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ C. Adaptation: ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________
168
How did leaders in your region demonstrate help to overcome these barriers? ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ What was your own leadership role in demonstrating how to overcome these barriers? ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________ ___________________________________________
169
170
EpilOgue
The universe is not made of atoms. It is made of stories. Unknown StoryTech enables the construction of virtual contexts. In such contexts, people are able to tell different stories about desirable futures, then link these back to the contemporary real world. The StoryTech process: Requires constant focus on malleable internal contexts. With practice, evolves personal Ba, or internal contexts. Evokes, creates, and selectively applies tacit knowledge. Permits a vast expansion of perspectives and choices.
We are beginning the Twenty-First Century. Were on the ramp into a new and exciting frontier for those who can master the intricacies of change. Many believe that more changes will occur in the next ten or twenty years of the ramp than have occurred since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution. Why do they believe this? Chaos and turbulence are becoming the new personal and community realities. Everything is changing, and, much of the time, change is occurring unpredictable. New information and knowledge resources are forged out of the challenges posed by such chaos and turbulence. Effective management of change results from bringing information and knowledge together, interfacing these two resources for the benet of the individual, the organization and the community. The Guidebook is about the use of new stories to produce new and useful information and
171
knowledge: Storytelling is based on historical oral tradition and has been used to: Strengthen and change cultural beliefs. Transmit knowledge and ideas. Communicate values and principles. Coalesce and clarify reality. Information is a social resourceideas, skills and beliefs shared within the community. Knowledge is a personal resourceideas, skills and beliefs yet to be shared within the community. What will be demanded of individuals and communities to survive, and to develop suitable and rewarding lifestyles, skills, values, and ideals during the ramp into this new Century? Who will be the individuals, organizations, corporations, and communities whose examples will inspire us, and create within each of us the will and the focus to ramp condently into the future? Who will provide the leadership and examples to guarantee that we will thrive, not merely survive? What new stories can be told to help us navigate this new Century? Storytelling is an ancient technology. It is many thousands of years old. Personalized stories are the engines of new knowledge production for individuals. The Buddhist concept of mindfulness plays a major part in new knowledge production based on stories. Historically, storytelling has been a primary means for transmitting beliefs and knowledge. Storytelling, therefore, is a personal technology for learning and for social and cultural communications. Oral tradition underlies storytelling. In use since pre-history, it is pervasive among all people. Not all societies have historically used the wheel, the lever, or the plough. However, all societies throughout history have extensively used stories to construct and share meaning. The purpose of StoryTech is to introduce a modern application of the ancient human capacity for storytelling. It will address the purpose, structures, and process of story constructions. It will provide concrete steps for the construction of new personal knowledge to support intellectually and emotionally improved decision making now and in the future. It will explore and explain the evolution of storytelling as an individualized strate-
172
gic process capable of bringing value to individuals, and through them, to groups. StoryTech speaks to people who want to create positive outcomes in their emerging futures. StoryTech facilitators and participants are those whose innovative stories and scenarios can make a positive difference in the totality of their lives, including their interactions with others at work, in the community and in the home. Wed like to remind both you that the future is neither out there nor especially distant. Rather, it can be right inside us at this very moment. We need to recognize the immediacy of future time, something that has been denied us by overly literal interpretations of the calendar. Can you imagine anything more exciting than an immediately accessible best case future? We cant, and we wonder who could! On the other hand, theres always the problem of getting what we want. Thats sometimes the worst of all worlds, because its often expedient to be pessimistic; to assume that things will fall apart despite all our efforts. Such defeatism prefers to eschew responsibility for the future, particularly in the case of highly positive or visionary aspirations and projections. Our explanation for is this starkly simple: positive change usually demands more responsibility from us than negative change. As we leave you temporarily, please remind yourself that now is the time to develop new stories for new futures. Nothing in human history has the power of stories to inspire. Not even images, which are meaningless without vital story contexts. Remember, too, that the shelf life of practical stories is constantly shortening, demanding that up-to-date people constantly renew their repertoires of new and refurbished strategic stories. We have provided the Guidebook in the hope that it will be practical. We are most interested in how you, the Designing Professional Futures student, determined whether the Guidebook t the course and your emerging professional needs. We are interested in how you may have found it confusing, difficult, overly divergent, or too simplied. Were equally interested in how it met your criteria for clarity, ease, focus, and appropriate complexity. Your critiques are of inestimable importance, so please let us know them. Your future is our focus.
173
Stay in touch. Arthur can be reached at harki001@umn.edu or by phone: 612-743-7528. George can be reached at kubik005@umn.edu and at 651452-3887.
174
175
176
Amaro, A. C., & Moreira, A. (2002). Kids as storytellers and design partners: learning and the development of storytelling technologies. In M. Nistal, M. Iglesias and L. Rifon (Eds.), Actas do Congresso IE-2002 (pp. 1-8). Retrieved March 04, 2012, from http://lsm.dei.uc.pt/ribie/docles/txt2003729191646paper-052.pdf Boje, D. M. (2001). Narrative methods for organizational and communication research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Boje, D.M. (1991). Consulting & change in the storytelling organization. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 4(3), 7-17. Boje, D.M. (1991). Organizations as storytelling networks: A study of story performance in an office-supply rm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 106-126. Brown, J.S., Denning, S., Groh, K., & Prusak, L. (2004). Storytelling in organizations: why storytelling is transforming 21st century organizations and management. Boston: Butterworth Heinemann. Carminatti, N., & Borges, M.R.S. (2006). Analyzing approaches to collective knowledge recall. Computing and Informatics, 25, 547-570. Cox, A. (2007). Reproducing knowledge: Xerox and the story of knowledge management. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 5, 312. Denning, S. (2004). Telling Tales. Harvard Business Review, 82(5), 122-129, 152.
177
Escalfoni, R., Braganholo, V., & Borges, M.R.S. (2011). A method for capturing innovation features using group storytelling. Expert Systems With Applications: An International Journal, 38(2), 1148-1159. Fisher, W. R. (1984). Narration as a human communication paradigm: the case of public moral argument. Communication Monographs, 51(1), 122. Gabriel, Y. (2000). Storytelling in organizations: facts, ctions, and fantasies. New York: Oxford University Press. Gargiulo, T.L. (2007). Once upon a time: using story-based activities to develop breakthrough communication skills. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer. Gargiulo, T.L. (2006). Stories at work: using stories to improve communication and build relationships. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers. Kalid, K.S.B., & Mahmood, A.K.B. (2010). Using stories to share knowledge: a malaysian organization case study. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 11(1). Kalid, K.S.B., & Mahmud, A.K.B. (September 26, 2008) A proposed organization storytelling conceptual framework for the purpose of transferring tacit knowledge. In, H.B. Zaman [et al.] (Eds.), Cognitive informatics: bridging natural and articial knowledge: proceedings, International Symposium of Information Technology 2008. Kuala Lumpur Convention Centre, Malaysia, August 26-29, 2008, Co-sponsored by IEEE. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE. Nguyen, C., Gallagher, E., Read, A., & de Vreede, G. (2009). Generating user stories in groups. In, L. Carrio, N. Baloian, & B. Fonseca (Eds.), Groupware: design, implementation, and use (Volume: 5784, 357-364). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. Santoro, F.M., Borges, M.R.S., & Pino, J.A. (2010). Acquiring knowledge on business processes from stakeholders stories. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 24, 138148. Shaw, G., Brown, R., & Bromiley, P. (1998), Strategic stories: how 3M is rewriting business planning. Harvard Business Review, 76 (3), 41-50. Sole, D., & Wilson, D.G. (2002). Storytelling in organizations: the power and traps of using stories to share knowledge in organizations. LILA Harvard Graduate School of Education, 1-8. Retrieved March 04, 2012, from http:// www.providersedge.com/docs/km_articles/Storytelling_in_Organizations.pdf
178
Tobin, P.K.J., & Snyman, R. (2008). Once upon a time in Africa: a case study of storytelling for knowledge sharing. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, 60(2), 130-142. Valle, C., Prinz, W., & Borges, M.R.S. (2002), Generation of group storytelling in post-decision implementation process, In Proceedings 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design, September 25-27, 2002 (pp. 361-367). Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
179
180
9 780978 743413