Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Head loss through smooth and rough pipes and the relationship between the
friction factor ( f) and Re number:
The determination of the experimental head loss for the smooth and rough pipes was
determined through the following equation:
[1]
Where;
2,
is converted from (cm H 2O) to (N/m2), which is equivalent to (Pa) using Equation
The theoretical head loss was calculated using the pipe friction equation below (htheo)
Where; f is the friction Factor, L is the length of the pipe (all pipes are 1 m long),
and D is the inner diameter of pipe (m).
The velocity of the flow rate (m/s) was calculated using Equation 4.
[2]
[2]
[2]
Table 1: Data needed to calculate hexp for rough pipe (D = 17 mm) with = 1.12 mm.
Q
(L/min)
20
25
30
35
40
Q
(m3/s)
0.00033
0.00042
0.00050
0.00058
0.00067
D (m)
0.0170
0.0170
0.0170
0.0170
0.0170
u
(m/s)
Re
1.468
25928.
55896
9601
1.835
32411.
6987
2001
2.202
38893.
83844
4402
2.569
45375.
97818
6802
2.937
51857.
11792
9202
P
(cm
H2o)
35
55
83
117
157
P
(Pa)
hexp
(m)
3432
0.3509
.328
16
5393
0.5514
.658
8139
0.8321
.52
73
1147
1.1730
3.78
63
1539
1.5741
6.44
11
/
f
D
0.0
0.016
658
59491
82
0.0
0.016
658
56600
82
0.0
0.016
658
54666
82
0.0
0.016
658
53282
82
0.0
0.016
658
52243
82
htheo
(m)
0.429
21
0.669
472
0.962
915
1.309
538
1.709
341
Where; is the kinematic viscosity of water (0.9612 x 10-3 Pa.s ), and is the
surface roughness of the pipe (1.12 mm).
For Rough pipes
% error
18.24131
17.63063
13.5777
10.42157
7.911262
Table 1 shows, the pressure drop for each flow rate in (Pa), the experimental head loss, and
the percentage error between the theoretical and experimental head loss. The friction factor
for this pipe is calculated using the following correlation, not from moody chart because the
value of relative roughness is outside the range of moody chart
[2]
Figure 1: The relation between the head loss (h) and the flow rate (Q) for rough pipe (D = 17
mm).
Figure 1 are obtained by plotting the experimental and theoretical head loss in (m) versus the
water flow rate in (m3/s), while figure 2 represent the relation between the friction factor and
Reynolds's number, which is as Reynolds's number increase, the friction factor decrease.
Table 2: Data needed to calculate hexp for rough pipe (D = 23 mm) with rough () = 1.12 mm.
Q
(L/min
)
20
25
30
35
40
Q
(m3/s)
0.000
33
0.000
42
0.000
50
0.000
58
0.000
67
D
(m)
0.02
30
0.02
30
0.02
30
0.02
30
0.02
30
u (m/s)
Re
0.80229
19164.8
403
836
1.00286
23956.1
753
044
1.20344
28747.3
104
253
1.40401
33538.5
455
462
1.60458
38329.7
805
671
P
(cm
H2o)
5
9.7
14.5
20.5
27
P
(Pa)
hexp
(m)
/D
htheo
(m)
%
error
490.33
0.0501
0.0486
0.017
0.0983
49.035
25
31
96
24
64
46
951.24
0.0972
0.0486
0.017
0.1532
36.538
51
54
96
19
48
37
1421.9
0.1453
0.0486
0.017
0.2202
34.006
64
96
16
93
13
2010.3
0.2055
0.0486
0.017
0.2994
31.371
63
37
96
14
93
85
2647.7
0.2707
0.0486
0.017
0.3907
30.715
96
07
96
12
19
61
Figure 3: The relation between the head loss (h) and the flow rate (Q) for rough pipe (D = 23 mm).
Q
Q
(L/min (m3/s D
)
)
(m)
7
0.000
12
0.00
65
u (m/s)
Re
3.51585
23734.9
181
712
P
(cm
H2o)
171.5
P
(Pa)
hexp
(m)
16818
.4
%
error
htheo(
m)
1.719
0.00636
2.467
30.31
49
4729
679
953
11
13
17
0.000
0.00
65
15
0.000
0.00
65
18
0.000
0.00
65
22
0.000
28
0.00
65
4.52038
30516.3
09
915
5.52490
37297.8
999
118
6.52943
44079.2
908
322
8.53849
57642.0
726
728
238.6
350
450.1
737
23398
2.392
0.00597
3.830
37.55
.67
247
7145
818
257
34323
3.509
0.00568
5.442
35.52
.28
164
4683
573
381
44139
4.512
0.00545
7.290
38.10
.73
785
216
679
199
72275
7.389
0.00509
11.65
36.62
.01
297
8497
877
026
Figure 5: The relation between the head loss (h) and the flow rate (Q) forSmooth pipe (D = 6.5 mm).
Table 4: Data needed to calculate hexp for Smooth pipe (D = 16.5 mm).
Q
(L/m
in)
20
25
30
35
40
Q
(m3/s
)
0.000
33
0.000
42
0.000
50
0.000
58
0.000
67
D
(m)
0.01
65
0.01
65
0.01
65
0.01
65
0.01
65
u (m/s)
Re
1.55891
26714.6
107
862
1.94863
33393.3
884
577
2.33836
40072.0
661
292
2.72809
46750.7
438
008
3.11782
53429.3
215
723
P
(cm
H2o)
16.6
27.7
38.2
52
67
P
(Pa)
hexp
(m)
htheo
(m)
%
error
1627.
0.166
0.006179
0.185
10.301
904
435
304
549
65
2716.
0.277
0.005844
0.274
1.2893
442
725
025
19
05
0.005583
0.377
1.5266
632
241
38
3746.
14
0.383
5099.
0.521
0.005372
0.494
5.5268
458
362
545
056
81
6570.
0.671
0.005196
0.624
7.6337
456
754
155
111
95
Figure 7: The relation between the head loss (h) and the flow rate (Q) forSmooth pipe (D = 16.5 mm).
Table 5: Data needed to calculate hexp for Smooth pipe (D = 26.6 mm).
Q
Q
(L/mi (m3/s
n)
)
20
25
30
35
40
0.000
33
0.000
42
0.000
50
0.000
58
0.000
67
D
(m)
0.02
66
0.02
66
0.02
66
0.02
66
0.02
66
u
(m/s)
Re
0.59982
16571.1
693
399
0.74978
20713.9
366
249
0.89974
24856.7
039
099
1.04969
28999.4
712
949
1.19965
33142.2
385
798
P
(cm
H2o)
0.2
1.2
2.2
3.7
P
(Pa)
hexp
(m)
htheo
(m)
%
error
19.61
0.002
0.006962
0.019
89.556
33
005
881
201
52
117.6
0.012
0.006585
0.028
57.596
798
031
087
373
27
215.7
0.022
0.006291
0.039
43.496
463
058
674
037
11
362.8
0.037
0.006053
0.051
27.439
461
097
82
125
46
490.3
0.050
0.005855
0.064
22.378
325
131
062
584
35
Figure 9: The relation between the head loss (h) and the flow rate (Q) forSmooth pipe (D = 26.6 mm).
Figure 10: Relation between f and Re for smooth pipe (D = 26.6 mm).
Kexp =
(8)
Q
(L/mi
n)
20
25
30
35
40
Q
(m3/
s)
0.00
033
0.00
042
0.00
050
0.00
058
0.00
067
D
(m)
0.0
23
0.0
230
0.0
230
0.0
230
0.0
230
u
(m/s)
Re
0.802 1917
7
4.59
1.003 2396
375
8.24
1.204 2876
05
1.88
1.404 3355
725
5.53
1.605 3834
401
9.18
P
(cm
H2o)
0.2
1.2
2.7
6.1
P
(Pa)
hexp
(m)
Kexp
19.61 0.0020
0.061
33
06
05237
117.6 0.0120
0.234
798
471
3142
264.7 0.0270
0.366
796
361
70695
392.2 0.0401
0.398
66
76
04734
598.2 0.0611
0.465
057
584
59719
Kth
[5]
0.1
300
0.1
300
0.1
300
0.1
300
0.1
300
10
htheo
(m)
h % K %
error error
0.004
53.03
53.03
2692
066
066
80.36
80.36
23
23
181.8
181.8
16
16
206.7
206.7
39
39
258.1
258.1
41
41
0.006
6707
0.009
6058
0.013
0746
0.017
077
Figure 11: The relation between the head loss (h) and the flow rate (Q) forgate valve (D = 23 mm).
Figure 11 illustrate that the difference between the theoretical and experimental head
loss at each flow rate.
Q
(L/mi
n)
20
25
30
35
Q
(m3/
s)
0.00
033
0.00
042
0.00
050
0.00
058
D
(m)
0.0
200
0.0
200
0.0
200
0.0
200
u
(m/s)
Re
1.061
2205
571
0.78
1.326
2756
964
3.47
1.592
3307
357
6.16
1.857
3858
749
8.86
P
(cm
H2o)
0.7
3.4
5.4
Kt
P
(Pa)
hexp
(m)
Kexp
heo
htheo
(m)
h % K %
error error
68.64
0.0070
0.122
0.
0.009
23.63
23.631
655
18328
19
16
1901
146
46
196.1
0.0200
0.223
0.
0.014
33
52367
433
16
3595
39.64
39.645
53
333.4
0.0340
0.263
0.
0.020
261
89024
775
16
6777
64.85
64.859
91
529.5
0.0541
0.307
0.
0.028
591
4139
79
16
1446
92.36
92.368
11
40
0.00
067
0.0
200
2.123
4410
142
1.55
7.5
735.4
0.0751
0.327
0.
0.036
988
96376
294
16
7603
86
104.5
104.55
59
Figure 12: The relation between the head loss (h) and the flow rate (Q) for ball valve (D = 20 mm).
Q
(L/mi
n)
20
25
30
35
Q
D
(m3/
(m)
s)
0.00
033
0.00
042
0.00
050
0.00
058
0.0
150
0.0
150
0.0
150
0.0
150
u
(m/s)
Re
1.887
2940
238
1.04
2.359
3675
047
1.29
2.830
4410
856
1.55
3.302
5145
666
1.81
P
(cm
H2o)
26.3
42.8
62.5
86.5
Kt
P
(Pa)
hexp
(m)
Kexp
2579.
0.2636
1.452
149
88624
571
4197.
0.4291
1.512
246
2065
883
6129.
0.6266
1.534
156
36463
19
8482.
0.8672
1.559
752
64865
989
12
heo
[5]
3.
00
3.
00
3.
00
3.
00
htheo(m
)
h % K %
error error
0.544
51.58
51.58
5972
098
098
0.850
49.57
49.57
9331
058
058
1.225
48.86
48.86
3437
035
035
1.667
48.00
48.00
8289
037
037
40
0.00
067
0.0
150
3.774
5880
475
2.07
114
1117
1.1429
1.574
9.58
84909
078
3.
00
2.178
47.53
47.53
3887
072
072
Figure 13: The relation between the head loss (h) and the flow rate (Q) for angle seat valve (D = 15 mm).
Q
(L/mi
n)
20
25
30
35
Q
(m3/s
)
D
(m
)
u
(m/s)
Re
0.00
0.
1.061
2205
033
02
571
0.78
0.00
0.
1.326
2756
042
02
964
3.47
0.00
0.
1.592
3307
050
02
357
6.16
0.00
0.
1.857
3858
058
02
749
8.86
P
P
(cm
(Pa)
H2o)
15.1
25
36.8
49.8
hexp
(m)
Kexp
1480.
0.15139
2.635
804
537
806
2451.
0.25065
2.792
663
4585
907
3608.
0.36896
2.854
847
355
971
4883.
0.49930
2.838
712
3934
505
13
Kth
[4]
2.3
0
2.3
0
2.3
0
2.3
0
htheo
(m)
h % K %
error error
-
14.60
14.60
02
02
21.43
21.43
07
07
24.12
24.12
92
92
0.404
5788
23.41
23.41
0.132
1074
0.206
4178
0.297
2416
40
0.00
0.
2.123
4410
067
02
142
1.55
67
6570.
0.67175
2.923
456
4289
824
2.3
0
0.528
4295
33
33
27.12
27.12
28
28
Figure 14: The relation between the head loss (h) and the flow rate (Q) for diaphragm valve (D=20 mm).
Q (L/min)
Q
(m3/s)
20
0.00033
25
0.00042
30
0.00050
35
0.00058
40
0.00067
D
(m)
0.025
0
0.025
0
0.025
0
0.025
0
0.025
0
u (m/s)
Re
P
P (Pa)
(cm H2o)
hexp
(m)
Kexp [5]
Ktheo[2]
htheo (m
0.0174
0.0272
0.0391
1.18896
0.0533
0.0696
30871.09 9.2
14
Figure 15: The relation between the head loss (h) and the flow rate (Q) for90 elbow (D = 25 mm).
Q
(L/
min)
20
Q
D
(m3 (m
/s)
)
u
(m/s
)
Re
0.0
0.67
176
940
40.6
003
3
0.0
25
004
2
0.0
30
005
0
0.0
35
005
8
0.0
25
0
0.0
25
0
0.0
25
0
0.0
25
0
P
(cm
H 2o
)
K
hexp
(m)
Kexp
88.2
0.009
0.38
598
0235
354
65
0.84
220
215.
0.022
0.60
0.01
925
50.7
746
0576
003
1028 100.
100.
04
013
013
1.01
264
313.
0.032
0.01
910
60.9
812
0837
5880 102.
102.
87
033
033
308
598.
0.061
0.84
0.02
205
1597
884
1615 182.
182.
19
95
1.18
896
71.0
9
0.9
2.2
3.2
6.1
th
e
htheo(
m)
h % K %
erro erro
r
r
P
(Pa)
[5]
15
0.60
61
0.00
7058
27.8
27.8
491
491
95
0.0
40
006
7
0.0
25
0
1.35
352
881
81.2
8.9
872.
0.089
0.94
0.02
791
2330
821
8231 216.
216.
32
071
071
Figure 16: The relation between the head loss (h) and the flow rate (Q) for45 elbow (D = 25 mm).
16
[3]
Venturi meter:
Table 12: Data needed to calculate Cvexp forVenturi meter (D = 0.02m).
Q
Q
(L/min) (m3/s)
D
(m)
u
(m/s)
Re
20
0.00033
0.02
0.8884
25
0.00042
0.02
30
0.00050
35
40
P
(cm H2o)
P
(Pa)
Cvexp
Cvtheo
% error
18453.733 3.4
333.4261
1.1949
0.97
23.19
1.1802
24514.351 6
588.399
1.1244
0.98
14.73
0.02
1.4850
30846.549 9.5
931.63175
1.0723
0.97
10.54
0.00058
0.02
1.8220
37845.373 14.3
1402.35095 1.0196
0.98
4.05
0.00067
0.02
2.1166
43966.656 19.3
1892.68345 1.0031
0.99
1.32
Table 12 represents the discharge coefficient for the venturi meter at each flow rate,
and the error between them.
Orifice plate:
Table 13: Data needed to calculate Cvexpfor Orifice plate (D1 = 32 mm, D2=20mm).
Q
Q
(L/min) (m3/s)
D2
(m)
D1
(m)
D2/D1
u
(m/s)
Re
P
(cm H2o)
P
(Pa)
Cvexp
Cvtheo[6]
%
error
20
0.00033
0.0200
0.0320
0.6250
1.4850
30846.55 9.5
931.63175 0.71
0.64
11.70
25
0.00042
0.0200
0.0320
0.6250
1.9452
40405.32 16.3
1598.484
0.635
7.43
30
0.00050
0.0200
0.0320
0.6250
2.3848
49536.79 24.5
2402.6293 0.67
0.63
5.99
35
0.00058
0.0200
0.0320
0.6250
2.8626
59460.99 35.3
3461.7475 0.65
0.635
2.20
40
0.00067
0.0200
0.0320
0.6250
3.3484
69553.40 48.3
4736.612
0.62
2.27
17
0.68
0.63
Table 13 represents the discharge coefficient for the orifice meter at each flow rate,
and the error between them.
18
Sample Calculation:
For the rough pipe D=17 mm
For other pipes from moody chart by getting Reynolds number and the relative
roughness
19
= htheor
Kexp =
20
21