20006265

Quantec Geoscience Ltd.
Geophysical Survey
Report

Regarding the
IP/RESISTIVITY SURVEYS
over Claim 04202823, Cairo Twp.,
Larder Lake Mining District, Ontario
on behalf of
Pro Minerals Inc.

G. R. J. Warne

April, 2009
Project CA00645C
Quantec Geoscience Ltd.
5825 King Street
Porcupine, ON P0N 1C0
Phone (705) 235-2166
Fax (705) 235-2255
QUANTEC GEOSCIENCE LTD. PRO MINERALS INC.
IP/Resistivity Surveys Claim 04202823
CA00645C, April, 2009
ii
SUMMARY
IP and Resistivity geophysical surveys, centered over a small lake on Claim 04202823 in Cairo township,
Ontario, were conducted by Quantec Geoscience during April 4 to Arpil 9, 2009. The objective of the sur-
veys was to determine if large gold-bearing sulphide mineralized boulders, located at the south end of the
lake by previous prospecting, may have originated from a bedrock source underlying the lake. The sur-
veys have successfully delineated apparent Resistivity and Chargeability underlying the lake and imme-
diate shoreline, investigating to depths up to 100 meters. The surveys have not detected chargeability
anomalies of sufficient magnitude and extent to conclude that a substantive bedrock source of the bould-
ers is present underlying the lake or shoreline margin.

CA00645C, April, 2009
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................................... II
1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 3
2. GENERAL SURVEY DETAILS ............................................................................................................... 4
2.1 LOCATION ..................................................................................................................................... 4
2.2 ACCESS ........................................................................................................................................ 4
2.3 SURVEY GRIDS .............................................................................................................................. 5
3. SURVEY WORK UNDERTAKEN .......................................................................................................... 6
3.1 GENERALITIES ............................................................................................................................... 6
3.2 PERSONNEL .................................................................................................................................. 6
3.3 SURVEY SPECIFICATIONS ............................................................................................................... 6
3.4 SURVEY COVERAGE....................................................................................................................... 8
3.5 INSTRUMENTATION ......................................................................................................................... 8
3.6 PARAMETERS ................................................................................................................................ 8
3.7 MEASUREMENT ACCURACY AND REPEATABILITY ............................................................................. 9
3.8 DATA PRESENTATION ................................................................................................................... 10
4. DISCUSSION OF RESULTS ................................................................................................................ 11
4.1 GRADIENT ARRAY RESULTS ......................................................................................................... 11
4.2 DIPOLE-DIPOLE ARRAY RESULTS .................................................................................................. 12
5. CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................................................................... 13
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX A: STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATION
APPENDIX B: PRODUCTION LOG
APPENDIX C: THEORETICAL BASIS AND SURVEY PROCEDURES
APPENDIX D: INSTRUMENT SPECIFICATIONS
APPENDIX E: LIST OF MAPS
APPENDIX F: MAPS AND SECTIONS
LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES
Figure 1: General Location of Claim 04202823 ...................................................................................... 4
Figure 2: General Layout of the Gradient Array ...................................................................................... 7
Figure 3: General Layout of the Dipole-Dipole Array............................................................................... 7

Table 1: Survey Line Location UTM References (NAD83 Zone 17T). .................................................... 5
Table 2: Gradient Array IP/Resistivity Survey Coverage ......................................................................... 8
Table 3: Elrec-Pro Semi-Log Decay Curve Sampling (2 Sec. Cycle) ..................................................... 9
Table 4: Elrec-6 Semi-Log Decay Curve Sampling (2 Sec. Cycle) ......................................................... 9
CA00645C, April, 2009
3
1. INTRODUCTION
QGL Project No: CA00645C
Project Name: Claim 04202823
Survey Period: April 3
td
to April 9
th
, 2009
Survey Type: Induced Polarization and Resistivity
Client: Pro Minerals Inc.
Client Address Suite 1600, 543 Granville Street
Vancouver, BC
Canada
V6C 1X8
Representative: Chris Chu, Doug Robinson
Objectives:
Previous prospecting on claim 04202823 had located large, angular boulders, hosting
gold bearing disseminated sulphide mineralization of interest, close to the outlet stream
at the south end of a small lake located on the claim. The primary objective of the geo-
physical survey was to determine if the boulders may have originated from a potential
bedrock hosted zone of metallic sulphide mineralization located underlying the lake.
CA00645C, April, 2009
4
2. GENERAL SURVEY DETAILS
2.1 LOCATION
Township: Cairo Twp., Larder Lake Mining District
Province/Territory: Ontario
Country: Canada
Nearest Settlement: Matachewan, ON ~ 8 km by road, southwest.
UTM Reference : NAD83, Zone 17T
Mining Claims: 04202823

Figure 1: General Location of Claim 04202823
2.2 ACCESS
Base of Operations: Matachewan, ON
Mode of Access: 4WD truck via local roads.
Pro Minerals Inc.
Claim 04202823
CA00645C, April, 2009
5

2.3 SURVEY GRIDS
Coordinate Reference System: Local exploration grid, referenced to UTM (see
Table 1).
Established: prior to survey execution.
Line Direction: north-south and east-west
Line Separation: 50 meters
Station Interval: 25 meters
Method of Chaining: Slope-Distance rope chaining.
Grid East
(Line)
Grid North
(Station)
UTM
EASTING
UTM
NORTHING
Altitude
(m)
Description
-50 -200 529209 5314049 340 Station
0 -200 529261 5314047 345 Station
50 -200 529304 5314048 342 Station
100 -200 529360 5314049 335 Station
-100 -150 529155 5314095 343 Station
-50 -150 529203 5314096 338 Station
-25 -150 529236 5314094 340 Station
0 -150 529260 5314097 340 Station
25 -150 529285 5314097 339 Station
50 -150 529305 5314098 338 Station
75 -150 529330 5314099 336 Station
100 -150 529353 5314097 339 Station
125 -150 529377 5314098 343 Station
150 -150 529400 5314095 344 Station
200 -100 529454 5314150 336 Station
-100 -50 529158 5314195 339 Station
-50 -50 529208 5314194 337 Station
0 -50 529258 5314197 340 Station
50 -50 529306 5314198 342 Station
75 -50 529333 5314196 339 Station
200 -50 529454 5314203 340 Station
250 -50 529496 5314199 336 Station
-100 100 529150 5314342 338 Station
-50 100 529211 5314344 337 Station
0 100 529251 5314347 337 Station
50 100 529308 5314346 342 Station
100 100 529358 5314347 338 Station
-400 -50 528865 5314189 345 Tx Electrode
400 -50 529644 5314214 329 Tx Electrode
0 -550 529284 5313683 352 Tx Electrode
0 450 529228 5314698 343 Tx Electrode
Table 1: Survey Line Location UTM References (NAD83 Zone 17T).

CA00645C, April, 2009
6
3. SURVEY WORK UNDERTAKEN
3.1 GENERALITIES
Survey Dates: April 3
rd
to April 9
th
, 2008
Survey Period: 6.5 days
Survey Days (read time): 6 days
Breakdown Days: 0 days
Weather/Standby Days: 0 days
Mobilization Days: 0.5 days
Survey Coverage: 4.5 line kilometers
3.2 PERSONNEL
Project Manager: Jeff Warne, South Porcupine, ON
Field Supervisor: Jeff Warne, South Porcupine, ON
Geophysical Operators: Justin, Lehti, Kirkland Lake, ON
Field Assistants: Eric Hotvedt, Nipigon, ON
William Commanda, North Bay, ON

3.3 SURVEY SPECIFICATIONS
Electrode Array: Gradient (see Figure 3)
Dipole-dipole (see Figure 4)
Rx dipole spacing: Gradient Array MN = 12.5 metres.
Dipole-dipole Array a = 12.5 metres, n = 1 to 10
Tx dipole spacing: East-West Gradient Array AB = 800 metres
North-South Gradient Array AB = 1000 metres
Dipole-dipole Array a = 12.5 metres
Sampling Interval: 12.5 metres

CA00645C, April, 2009
7
GRADIENT ARRAY
Tx
Rx
MN = length P
1
-P
2
(6 x P
1
-P
2
Spread)
GRADIENT ARRAY COVERAGE AREA
C
1
AB = length C
1
-C
2
C
2
P
1
P
2

Figure 2: General Layout of the Gradient Array

Tx
Rx Array
(6 dipoles n = 1 to 6)
Tx Dipole
X-Section Consisting of n = 1 - 6 Readings
Survey
Directon
Rx dipole
spacing a
1
2
n=1
n=2
n=3
3
Rx
4
n=4
5
6
n=5
n=6
Tx dipole
spacing a

Figure 3: General Layout of the Dipole-Dipole Array
CA00645C, April, 2009
8
3.4 SURVEY COVERAGE
Gradient Array IP/Resistivity: 4.15 line kilometers (see Table 2)
LINE MINIMUM MAXIMUM TOTAL (km)
Transmit Dipole (AB) electrodes located at 400W, 400E, line 50S
200 S 50 W 150 E 0.2
150 S 100 W 150 E 0.25
100 S 225 W 200 E 0.425
50 S 150 W 125 E 0.275
0 N 225 W 200 E 0.425
50 N 150 W 125 E 0.275
100 N 150 W 125 E 0.275
Transmit Dipole (AB) electrodes located at 550S, 450N, line 0E
100 W 150 S 175 N 0.325
50 W 200 S 150 N 0.35
0 E 225 S 150 N 0.375
50 E 325 S 300 N 0.625
100 E 225 S 125 N 0.35
Total 4.15
Table 2: Gradient Array IP/Resistivity Survey Coverage
DP-DP Array IP/Resistivity: 0.35 line kilometers, over line 50S from 137.5W to
212.5E
3.5 INSTRUMENTATION
IP Receiver: IRIS Elrec-Pro (Gradient Array coverage),
IRIS Elrec-6 (Dipole-dipole Array coverage)
IP Transmitter: Phoenix IPT-1 (75-1200 V, 2.5 KW)
IP Power Supply: Phoenix MG-2 (60V, 3 phase, 400 Hz)
3.6 PARAMETERS
Input Waveform: 0.125 Hz square wave at 50% duty cycle
(2 seconds On/Off)

Receiver Decay Sampling: IRIS Elrec-Pro, 20 semi-logarithmic spaced time gates
IRIS Elrec-6, 10 semi-logarithmic spaced time gates
(see Tables 3,4)
Measured Parameters:
1) Chargeability in millivolts/volt (time slices + total area under decay
curve) (see also Appendix C).
2) Primary Voltage in millivolts and Input Current in amperes for Resistivi-
ty calculation according to the electrode array geometry factor (see Ap-
pendix C).

CA00645C, April, 2009
9
Slice Duration (msec) Start (msec) End (msec) Mid-Point (msec)
TD 40 0 40 N/A
T1 40 40 80 60
T2 40 80 120 100
T3 40 120 160 140
T4 40 160 200 180
T5 40 200 240 220
T6 40 240 280 260
T7 80 280 360 320
T8 80 360 440 400
T9 80 440 520 480
T10 80 520 600 560
T11 80 600 680 640
T12 80 680 760 720
T13 80 760 840 800
T14 160 840 1000 920
T15 160 1000 1160 1080
T16 160 1160 1320 1240
T17 160 1320 1480 1400
T18 160 1480 1640 1560
T19 160 1640 1800 1720
T20 160 1800 1960 1880
Total Tp 1920
Table 3: Elrec-Pro Semi-Log Decay Curve Sampling (2 Sec. Cycle)

Slice Duration (msec) Start (msec) End (msec) Mid-Point (msec)
T
D
80 0 80 N/A
T
1
80 80 160 120
T
2
80 160 240 200
T
3
80 240 320 280
T
4
80 320 400 360
T
5
160 400 560 480
T
6
160 560 720 640
T
7
160 720 880 800
T
8
320 880 1200 1040
T
9
320 1200 1520 1360
T
10
320 1520 1840 1680
Total T
p
1760

Table 4: Elrec-6 Semi-Log Decay Curve Sampling (2 Sec. Cycle)

3.7 MEASUREMENT ACCURACY AND REPEATABILITY
Chargeability: generally less than 0.5 mV/V, acceptable to 1
mV/V in limited instances.
Resistivity: less than 5% cumulative error from Primary
voltage and Input current measurements.
CA00645C, April, 2009
10
3.8 DATA PRESENTATION
Digital Data:
Raw data:
The measured data were transferred from the Elrec-Pro and Elrec-6 instruments to
notebook computer using Prosys II software provided by IRIS Instruments.
Elrec-Pro instrument dump files are in binary file format. Un-edited daily instrument
dump files are archived, named according to the date of acquisition in the form
ddmmyy, e.g. 050409IP.bin. Daily dump files were edited, using Prosys II, to correct
any errors in electrode location if required. The edited data are archived to a
second file named according to date, e.g. 050409IPed.bin. The data were then im-
ported to the Geosoft
Oasis montaj
processing and mapping system.

Elrec-6 dump files are in ASCII text format. Unedited dump files are archive, named
according to date, e.g. 080509.raw. Corrections to electrode locations were made
using a text editor, if required and the edited file archived named according to date
e.g. 080509.dmp, and the data imported to Geosoft Oasis.
Processed data:
Measurements with excessive standard deviation (> 1 mV/V) were rejected and re-
peat measurements averaged using the Geosoft
Oasis montaj
IP extension.
The complete data set are archived in Geosoft
Oasis montaj
.gdb format Data-

base files as follows:
File CairoIP.gdb: Gradient array results for East-West survey lines
File CairoNS.gdb: Gradient array results for North-South survey lines.
File CairoDPDP.gdb: Dipole-dipole array results.
Maps:
The results of the gradient array surveys are presented as plan maps of the posted
and contoured Apparent Total Chargeability and Apparent Resistivity, at a scale of
1:2500, for each of the East-West and North-South sets of survey lines. A stacked
pseudosection map presents the Chargeability and Resistivity results of the dipole-
dipole array survey results, at a scale of 1:1250. The maps are provided in Oasis
.map file format, as well as Adobe
.pdf file format.

Paper copies of the section maps are included in the map pocket.
Archive:
The data and maps are archived in digital form, as described above, on CD, pro-
vided in the CD pocket.

CA00645C, April, 2009
11
4. DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
The IP/Resistivity surveys over Claim 04202823 were completed without incident.
Access to the survey location was excellent via local roads. The lake over which the survey was
centered is located 300 meters west of the road which leads north from Highway 66 to Mata-
chewan Native Reserve 72. Highway 66 is a distance of approximately 3 km to the south. The
town of Matachewan is a further 5 km west following highway 66.
An unexpected winter storm, which resulted in approximately 40 cm of snowfall overnight April
3, and through April 4, hampered progress of the field work initially.
The IP/Resistivity surveys have quantified apparent, bulk volume average DC resistivity and
chargeability at the Cairo township property.
The bulk volume resistivity is primarily influenced by subsurface variations in porosity, permea-
bility and moisture saturation. Significant concentrations of interconnected conductive minerali-
zation, such as massive sulphides, if present, also influence the bulk volume resistivity.
The chargeability is a near-direct indicator of the presence of metallic mineralization, based on
the polarize-ability of minerals that possess metallic properties. These include most metallic
sulphides, with the notable exception of sphalerite, those native metals that occur naturally, as
well as some metallic oxides, and graphite. Both conductivity and chargeability result from the
mobility of electrons within metals. However, whereas electronic conduction occurs within met-
als, polarization occurs at the interfaces between metallic grains and pore fluids. For this rea-
son, not only the volume content, but also the distribution and texture of chargeable mineraliza-
tion within host rocks are important factors influencing bulk volume chargeability.
4.1 GRADIENT ARRAY RESULTS
The Gradient electrode array employs a single, fixed transmit dipole. The specifications em-
ployed for the surveys typically provide investigation to depths up to approximately 100 meters
overall. However, the depth of investigation is reduced, according to the separation distance be-
tween the transmit and receive electrodes, where selected lines, 100S, 0N and 50E extended
closer to the corresponding transmit electrodes. The gradient array provides excellent resolution
of contrasts in the resistivity and chargeability across the survey lines, but is not sensitive to
contrasts which may follow trends near parallel to the survey lines. The fixed transmit dipole
does not provide multiple separation measurements, therefore resolution of the resistivity and
chargeability with respect to depth is limited.
The apparent Resistivity determined by the Gradient array surveys ranges from approximately
700 to 14,000 -m, which are moderate to very high. The majority of values are in the range
from approximately 1,500 to 6,000 -m, within the lower half of the resistivity range. The majori-
ty of lower resistivity values within the range also coincide with the area overlain by the lake.
Higher resistivities occur predominantly to the north and west of the lake. The results of the East
West set of survey lines have delineated a zone of lower resistivity trending north south,
centered at 50E. The feature is not evident in the results of the North - South set of survey lines,
which is consistent with the directional sensitivity of the array.
The apparent total Chargeability results from the Gradient surveys range from approximately 3
to 10 mV/V, which are low. The spatial distribution of the chargeability reflects that of the resis-
tivity, that is, higher chargeability values coincide with higher resistivity values.
CA00645C, April, 2009
12
4.2 DIPOLE-DIPOLE ARRAY RESULTS
The dipole-dipole electrode array specifications employed for the traverse over line 50S pro-
vides investigation to depths up to approximately 50 meters, with measurements over 10 sepa-
rations providing resolution of the resistivity and chargeability with respect to depth. The appar-
ent Resistivity results over line 50S range from approximately 40 to almost 10,000 -m, which
are low to high. The chargeability results range from -0.8 to 7.7 mV/V, which are low to very low.
The higher chargeability values generally coincide with higher resistivity values.
Low to moderate resistivity extends from station 112.5W to 87.5E, which coincides with the ex-
tent of the lake underlying line 50S. Low resistivity, less than 100 -m, occurs at small separa-
tions, n = 1 and n= 2 within this region, delineating a layer of low resistivity at surface of a few to
several meters thickness. The layer is clearly thicker centered at 50E, and to a lesser extent at
50W. The corresponding chargeability values are very low.
Both the resistivity and chargeability magnitudes increase to the east and west of the lake,
where both the thickness and moisture saturation of overburden are drastically reduced
CA00645C, April, 2009
13
5. CONCLUSIONS
The IP and Resistivity geophysical surveys centered over a small lake on Claim 04202823, in
Cairo township, Ontario, have successfully delineated apparent Resistivity and Chargeability
underlying the lake and immediate shoreline, investigating to depths up to 100 meters. Gradient
arrays have provided delineation of the geophysical properties in plan view, while a traverse
employing the dipole-dipole array has added resolution of the geophysical properties with re-
spect to depth over the selected traverse.
Both the resistivity and chargeability are lower within the region overlain by the lake, consistent
with the attenuating influence of non-chargeable, low resistivity overburden, comprised of the
lake and underlying sediments. A north-south trending zone of low resistivity has been deli-
neated centered at 50E over a width approximately 25 meters. The feature definitely reflects
deeper overburden within a bedrock trough at this location. There is no chargeability anomaly
associated with the low resistivity feature, nor have anomalous chargeable zones of sufficient
magnitude and extent been detected that would indicate a substantive zone of sulphide minera-
lization may be hosted elsewhere in the bedrock underlying the lake, or shoreline margins.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED
QUANTEC GEOSCIENCE LTD.

G. R. Jeffrey Warne
Senior Project Manager

CA00645C, April, 2009
APPENDIX A
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS

I, G.R. Jeffrey Warne, hereby declare that:

1. I am a senior geophysical project manager with residence in South Porcupine, Ontario and
am presently employed in this capacity with Quantec Geoscience Ltd. of Toronto, Ontario.

2. I studied Engineering Geophysics in the Faculty of Applied Science at Queen's University in
Kingston, Ontario, completing all but two of the course requirements for a B.Sc. (Eng.) in
1981.

3. I have practiced my profession continuously since May, 1981 in Canada, the United States,
Australia, Argentina, Bulgaria, Chile, Ireland, Mexico, Peru, Portugal and Serbia.

4. I have no interest, nor do I expect to receive any interest in the properties or securities of
Pro Minerals Incorporated.

5. I have supervised the data acquisition, evaluated the survey data, prepared the presenta-
tions and authored this report. The statements made in this report represent my profes-
sional opinion based on my consideration of the information available to me at the time of
writing this report.

Porcupine, Canada
April, 2009

G.R. Jeffrey Warne
Senior Project Manager, QGL

CA00645C, April, 2009
APPENDIX B
Project CA00645C, DCIP Survey, Pro Minerals Inc., Claim 04202828, Cairo Twp., ON

Date Description
Line Start End Total (m) Charges
03-Apr-09 J. Warne, E. Hotvedt, W. Com-
manda mob to Matachewan, locate
project site, access to grid. $2,000.00

04-Apr-09 Establish gradient transmit dipole
(AB), line 50S, 400E-400W. Auger
holes for measurement electrodes.
Deep snow in bush (4 - 5 feet).
Progress impeded by foul weather.
Pick up J. Lehti in evening. $3,600.00

05-Apr-09 Data acquisition and auger holes
for measurement electrodes. 150S 150E 100W 250

100S 225W 25E 250 $3,600.00

for measurement electrodes. 100S 25E 200E 175

Many holes had to be re-augered
due to freezing and drifting snow. 50S 125E 150W 275

0N 200E 225W 425

50N 150W 125E 275

100N 125E 150W 275 $3,600.00

for measurement electrodes. 200S 150E 50W 200

Re-locate gradient transmit dipole
to line 0E, 450N to 550S. 50E 325S 300N 625

Many holes had to be re-augered
due to freezing and drifting snow. 0E 150N 225S 375 $3,600.00

for measurement electrodes. 50W 200S 150N 350

100W 175N 150S 325

Recovered transmit dipole.
100E 225S 125N 350

Deployed Dipole-dipole array on
Line 50S. Rx malfunctioned after
initial reading (4:30 pm). $3,600.00

09-Apr-09 Dipole-dipole Data acquisition, re-
cover all cabling. 50S 137.5W 212.5E 350

Demobilize to Timmins.
$4,000.00

Total Survey Charges $24,000.00
Total IP Survey Coverage 4500

CA00645C, April, 2009
APPENDIX C
THEORETICAL BASIS AND SURVEY PROCEDURES
INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY
The resistivity is among the most variable of all geophysical parameters, with a range exceeding 10
6
.
Because most minerals are fundamentally insulators, with the exception of massive accumulations of metallic
and sub metallic ores (electronic conductors) which are rare occurrences, the resistivity of rocks depends
primarily on their porosity , permeability and particularly the salinity of fluids contained (ionic conduction), ac-
cording to Archies Law. In contrast, the chargeability responds to the presence of polarizeable minerals
(metals, sub metallic sulphides and oxides, and graphite), in amounts as minute as parts per hundred. Both
the quantity of individual chargeable grains present, and their distribution with in subsurface current flow paths
are significant in controlling the level of response. The relationship of chargeability to metallic content is
straightforward, and the influence of mineral distribution can be understood in geologic terms by considering
two similar, hypothetical volumes of rock in which fractures constitute the primary current flow paths. In one,
sulphides occur predominantly along fracture surfaces. In the second , the same volume percent of sulphides
are disseminated throughout the rock. The second example will, in general, have significantly lower intrinsic
chargeability.
The collected data sets are reduced to apparent resistivity and total chargeability as explained in the following
figures and equations.

A B
M
x-axis
y-axis
N
Y
X 0

Figure C1: Gradient Electrode Array
Referring to the diagram in Figure C1 for the gradient array electrode configuration and nomenclature
1
,
where: the origin 0 is selected at the center of AB
x is the abscissa of the mid-point of MN (positive or negative)
y is the ordinate of the mid-point of MN (positive or negative)
the geometric parameters are in addition to a = AB/2 and b = MN/2

1
From Terraplus\BRGM, IP-6 Operating Manual, Toronto, 1987.
CA00645C, April, 2009
the gradient array apparent resistivity is given by:
Gradient Array Apparent Resistivity:

a
P
= K
V
I
ohm- metres
where: K =
2
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
AM AN BM BN
AM a x b y
AN a x b y
BM x b a y
BN x b a y
1 1 1 1
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2

Referring to the diagram in Figure C2 for the electrode configuration and nomenclature:
2

Figure C2: Dipole-dipole Electrode Array

the apparent resistivity for the dipole-dipole array is given by:

metres - ohm
I
V
a 2 1 = a
P
n n n

where: a is the dipole spacing (metres)
n is the number of dipole spacings separating C1 and P1
VP is the primary voltage measured between P1P2 (volts)
I is the output current between C1C2 (amperes)

2
From Telford, et al., Applied Geophysics, Cambridge U Press, New York, 1983..
CA00645C, April, 2009
Using the diagram in Figure C3 for the Total Chargeability:

Time
Line
One half of Transmit Cycle
On Time
Vp
Measured
Voltage Line
negative
positive
0
Vs(t)
(10 slices)
Off Time
t
d
t
p
t (0)

Figure C3: Time Domain IP/Resistivity Measured Parameters
the total apparent chargeability is given by:

Total Apparent Chargeability:
3

M =
1
t V

t
t
millivolts per volt T
p p
i
i 1
i 1 to 10
Vs (t) dt

where t
i
, t
i+1
are the beginning and ending times for each of the chargeability slices,
More detailed descriptions on the theory and application of the IP/Resistivity method can be found in the
following reference papers:

Cogan, H., 1973, Comparison of IP electrode arrays, Geophysics, 38, p 737 - 761.

Langore, L., Alikaj, P., Gjovreku, D., 1989, Achievements in copper sulphide exploration in Albania with IP and EM me-
thods, Geophysical Prospecting, 37, p 925 - 941.

Telford, W. M., Geldart, L. P., Sheriff, R. E., Keys, D. A., 1986, Applied Geophysics, Cambridge University Press.

3
From Telford, et al., Applied Geophysics, Cambridge U Press, New York, 1983..
CA00645C, April, 2009
APPENDIX D - INSTRUMENT SPECIFICATIONS

ELREC PRO
Ten channel
IP receiver
for mineral
exploration
IRIS Instruments is pleased
to announce the ELREC PRO,
its new ten channel I P receiver,
featuring 20 chargeability windows
and a graphic LCD display.
The following improvements
have been introduced in this new
recei ver with respect
to the previous ELREC 10 unit:
HARDWARE FEATURES:
the size has been reduced by 4 em in height: 31x 21 x 21 em
- the power consumption has been reduced by a ratio of three, which means that with less
batteries it is possible to have a longer autonomy.
- as a result , the new system is 2 kg lightertllan tile ELREC 10, with a weight of 6 kg onl y.
- the data (21 000 readings max.) are stored in flash memories not requiring any lithium battery for
safeguard.
- the new system is compatible with the existing SWITCH Plus boxes for automatic switching of
electrooes according to preset sequences. In such a case, the recei ver is used as a single
channel unit; witll SWITCH Pro boxes (to be deveioped next), the full ten channel capability of
tile ELREC PRO will be usable for a higher acquistion speed.
SOFTWARE FEATURES:
- each new reading is stored as a specific unit file, making easier the grouping of readings
corresponding to a given profile, sped ally for the last (edge) pOints of a line obtained with a smaller
number of dipoles than the main part of the profile.
- the data format is compatible with the PROSYS software, which means that the operator can
easil y visualize the numerical values of the data, automatically sort them according to the standard
deviation of the chargeabil ity measurement, merge two files stored under different names,
introduce the elevation of earn electrode, etc ..
- the ELECTRE II software can be used to define and upload preset sequences of measurements
according to any type of electrode array.
IRIS INSTRUMENTS
1. avenue Bullon, BP 6007, Oneans Cdex 2, France
Ph + 332 38 6381 00 mail irisins@attgl obaLnet
Fax + 33 2 38 63 81 82 web iri s-insl rumenls. com
CA00645C, April, 2009
INSTRUMENT SPECIFICATIONS
IRIS ELREC 6 Receiver
(From IRIS Instruments IP 6 Operating Manual)

Weather proof case

Dimensions: 31 cm x 21 cm x 21 cm
Weight: 6 kg with dry cells
7.8 kg with rechargeable bat.
Operating temperature: -20 C to 70 C
(-40 C to 70 C with optional screen heater)
Storage: (-40 C to 70 C)
Power supply: 6 x 1.5 V dry cells (100 hr. @ 20 C) or
2 x 6 V NiCad rechargeable (in series) (50 hr. @ 20 C) or
1 x 12 V external
Input channels: 6
Input impedance: 10 Mohm
Input overvoltage protection: up to 1000 volts
Input voltage range: 10 V maximum on each dipole
15 V maximum sum over ch. 2 to 6
SP compensation: 6 automatic 10 V with linear drift correction up to 1 mV/s
Noise rejection: 50 to 60 Hz powerline rejections
100 dB common mode rejection (for Rs= 0)
automatic stacking
Primary voltage resolution: 1 V after stacking
accuracy: 0.3% typically; maximum 1 over whole
temperature range
Secondary voltage windows: up to 10 windows; 3 preset window specs .plus fully
programmable sampling.
Sampling rate: 10 ms
Synchronization accuracy: 10 ms, minimum 40 V
Chargeability resolution: 0.1 mV/V
accuracy: typically 0.6%. maximum 2% of reading 1
mV/V for Vp > 10 mV
Battery test: manual and automatic before each measurement
Grounding resistance: 0.1 to 467 kohm
Memory capacity: 2505 records, 1 dipole/record
Data transfer: serial link @ 300 to 19200 baud
CA00645C, April, 2009
IRIS IP 6 Dump File Format

* IP 6 (V9.1) *
*===================*

#77 Jul 1 1980 11:57
dipole 1 trigger 1 domain Time T wave
Programmable wind. Grad. RCTGL array

V= 331.605 Sp= -319 I= 1350.00 Rs= 0.50
Ro= 6679.4 Ohm-m M= 11.97 E= 0.4
M1= 40.44 M2= 33.55 M3= 29.48 M4= 26.68
M5= 20.95 M6= 15.52 M7= 12.50 M8= 9.77
M9= 7.50 M10= 6.05

cycle 19 Time= 2000 V_D= 1260 M_D= 40
T_M1= 20 T_M2= 30 T_M3= 30 T_M4= 30
T_M5= 180 T_M6= 180 T_M7= 180 T_M8= 360
T_M9= 360 T_M10= 360

Spacing config. : Imperial grid
XP=-1300.0 Line= 400.0
D= -100.0 AB/2= 2500.0

#78 Jul 1 1980 11:57
dipole 2 trigger 1 domain Time T wave
Programmable wind. Grad. RCTGL array

V= 265.781 Sp= 388 I= 1350.00 Rs= 1.41
Ro= 4687.7 Ohm-m M= 26.75 E= 0.0
M1= 76.18 M2= 66.06 M3= 59.31 M4= 54.53
M5= 44.38 M6= 34.29 M7= 28.35 M8= 22.83
M9= 18.06 M10= 14.96

cycle 19 Time= 2000 V_D= 1260 M_D= 40
T_M1= 20 T_M2= 30 T_M3= 30 T_M4= 30
T_M5= 180 T_M6= 180 T_M7= 180 T_M8= 360
T_M9= 360 T_M10= 360

Spacing config. : Imperial grid
XP=-1400.0 Line= 400.0
D= -100.0 AB/2= 2500.0

CA00645C, April, 2009
Phoenix IP Transmitter Model IPT-1

Power Sources: Phoenix MG-3 (2.5KVA, 60V, 3 phase, 400 Hz) motor generator

Output Voltage: 75 to 1200V in 5 steps.
75 - 150 - 300 - 600 - 1200V
Voltage is continuously variable 20% from each nominal step value.

Output Power: Maximum continuous output power is 2.5KW.

Maximum Current: 10 Amps

Ammeter Ranges: 30m A, 100m A, 300mA, 1A, 3A, and 10A full scale.

Meter Display: A meter function switch selects the display of current level, regula-
tion status, input frequency, output voltage, line voltage

Current regulation: The change in output current is less than 0.2% for a 10% change
in input voltage or electrode impedance. Regulation is achieved
by feedback to the alternator of the motor generator unit.

Output waveform: Either DC, single frequency, two frequencies simultaneously, or
time domain (50% duty cycle). Frequencies of 0.078, 0.156,
0.313, 1.25, 2.5 and 5.0 Hz are standard, whereas 0.062, 0.125,
0.25, 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0 Hz are optionally available. The simulta-
neous transmission mode has 0.313 and 5.0 Hz as standard,
whereas 0.156 and 2.5 Hz are optional.

Operating Temperature: -40
o
C to +60
o
C

Frequency Stability: 1% from -40
o
C to +60
o
C is standard. A precision time base is
optionally available for coherent detection and phase IP mea-
surements.

Transient Protection: Current is turned off automatically if it exceeds 150% full scale
or is less than 5% full scale.

Dimensions: 18cm x 40cm x 53cm

Weight: 17 kg

CA00645C, April, 2009
APPENDIX E
LISTS OF MAPS
Plan Maps at scale of 1:2500
Description Drawing No.
1. Posted, Contoured Apparent Resistivity, East-
West lines
CA00645C-PLAN-RES-EW
2. Posted, Contoured Total Chargeability, East-
West lines
CA00645C-PLAN-CHG-EW
3. Posted, Contoured Apparent Resistivity,
North-South lines
CA00645C-PLAN-RES-NS
4. Posted, Contoured Total Chargeability, North-
South lines
CA00645C-PLAN-CHG-NS
5. Claim Location Map CA00645C-PLAN-CLAIMS
TOTAL PLANS 5

Pseudosection Maps at scale of 1:1250
Description Drawing No.
1) Pseudosection Map Line 50 S
TOTAL SECTIONS 1

TOTAL MAPS: 6
CA00645C, April, 2009
APPENDIX F
MAPS AND SECTIONS
SECTION PLOT
0+50 S
1+00W O+7SW O+50W O+25W 0+00 E 0+25 E 0+50 E 0+75 E 1+00 E 1+25 E 1+50 E 1+75 E 2+00 E
Dipole-Dipole Array
, , , ,
, ,
,
, ,
,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , ,
Calculated Resistivit
Calculated Resistivity n:l

"'

,..
1757
"" ""
\ 9875
,.,
Ohm-m
Dhm"m

\6397
C'j
r!J
n-2
,.,
2367 ) 3657
,.,
Z891
,
,
,
,
n_4
241 3
"'"
0_4 2122
,
1293
,
,
a=12.5m
,.,
''''
'"'",
n=5 ,n
,
,
,
,
'"
" ,",
""
""
,",
."
plot point
,., ioo, ,.,
""
,so
SURVEY SPECIFICATIONS n=8 noB
'"
'"
Method: Time Domain ,.,

'"
Rx: IRIS Elrec-6, Tx: Phoenix tPT
0=10 2161
'" '" '"
..,
n=10
"
Waveform: Time Domain, 50% cycle
Frequency: 0.125 Hz, (2 sec onl sec. oR)
Time Gales: 10 semi-logarithmic spaced windows
Repeatability: 10% lotal measurements
Electrodes: 1 m stainless steel rods
Operators: J . Warne, J . Lehti
Scale 1 :1250
"
,
" "
-
1+00W O+7SW O+50W O+25W 0+00 E 0+25 E 0+50 E 0+75 E 1+00 E 1+25 E 1+50 E 1+75 E 2+00 E
Average IP
(meters)
,
, ,
,
, ,
,
, ,
,
,
,
,
,
, ,
,
,
, , , ,
,
, ,
,
,
,
,
,
Average IP ,., ,., m'N
m'N
PRO MINERALS INC n-2
,., ,.,
,

n_4 n_4
,
CLAIM 04202823 ,
,., ,.,
,
,",
,
Cairo Twp" ON
,., ,.,
,
INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY
,
n-8 n-B
,
,
,., ,.,
.,

SUI"eyed & by;
.,
QUANTEC GEOSCIENCE L TO
n-lO n- l 0
Ouantec
5825 King Street
Geoscience
Porcupine, ON PON 1CO
Map Generated by J . Warne
Date: April, 2009 Project: CA00645C Approved by: JW
eosoft Software for t he arth SCiences
Pro Minerals Inc.
Map Generated by J. Wame DWG': CAOOS.SCPLAN-CHGNS
9.9
8.8
8.1
7.4
6.9
6.6
63
6.1
5.8
5.5
5.1
4.6
4.3
3.6
Chargeability
mVN
SURVEY SPECIFICATIONS
Method: Time Domain IP/Resistivity
Rx: IRIS Elrec-Pro, Tx: Phoenix IPt -1
Waveform: Time Domain, 50% duty cycle
Frequency: 0.125 Hz, (2 sec. on/2 sec. off)
Time Gates: 20 semi-logarithmic spaced windows
Array: Gradient, AB = 1QOOm, MN = 12.Sm
Repeatability: 10% total measurements
Operators: J. Warne
PLOTTING PARAMETERS
Grid Cell Size: 6.25 metres
Gridding: Bi -directional
Filter Applied: 0 x Hanning Filter
Contours: Linear, 0.5, 2 mVN
Colour Zoning: Equal Area (colour.tbl)
Scale 1 :2500
25 50 75 100
==
(meters)
NAD8.J I UTM 17N
PRO MINERALS INC.
CLAIM 04202823
Cairo Twp., ON
CHARGEABILITY PLAN MAP
Time Domain IP/Resistivity SURVEY
Contoured Total Apparent Chargeability

Geoscience
S""'Gyed & Processed by:
5825 King Street
Survey Date: April, 2009 Project Ref. #: CAOO645C Approved by: JW
Map Generated by J. Wame
r

a
a
:;:
Pro Minerals Inc.
OWG II; CAOO6t5CPLANRESNS

6491
4830
4095
3645
3108
2624
2130
1837
Resistivity
ohm-m
Rx: IRIS Elrec-Pro, Tx: Phoenix IPt -1
Array: Gradient, AB = 1000m, MN = 12.Sm
Operators: J. Warne
PLOTTING PARAMETERS
Gridding: Bi -directional
Contours: Logarithmic, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 5, 7,.
Colour Zoning: Equal Area (resis.tbl)
Scale 1 :2500
25 50 75 100
==
(meters)
NAD8.J I UTM 17N
PRO MINERALS INC.
CLAIM 04202823
Cairo Twp., ON
RESISTIVITY PLAN MAP
Contoured Apparent Resistivity

Geoscience
S""'Gyed & Processed by:
5825 King Street
529100E 529200E 529300E
Pro Minerals Inc.
~ p Generated by J. Warne
529400E
'"
w
~
-fil++ __ ---j
z
s
12
~
Iitt 1'50-l3------j
o
Z
QWG II: CAOOS.SCPLAN-CHGEW
10,1
8.8
8.1
7.4
6.9
6.6
6.3
6.1
5.8
Rx: IRIS Elrec-Pro, Tx: Phoenix IPl-1
Array: Gradient, AS = 800m, MN = 12.5m
Operators: J. Warne
PLOTTING PARAMETERS
5.5 Grid Cell Size: 6.25 metres
5.1 Gridding: Bi-directional
4.6 Filter Applied: 0 x Hanning Filter
4.3 Contours: Linear, 0.5, 2 mVN
2.8 Colour Zoning: Equal Area (resis.tbl)
Chargeability
mVN
Scale 1 :2500
25 0
~
25 50 75 100 125 150
(meters)
NADBJIUTMzone 17N
PRO MINERALS INC.
CLAIM 04202823
,
Cairo Twp., ON
CHARGEABILITY PLAN MAP
Contoured Apparent Chargeabili ty
Ouantec
Geoscience
SurvvyW" P"",e Ued by:
5825 King Street
Porcupine, ON PON f CO
Survey Date: April. 2009 Project Ref. #: CAOO645C Approved by : JW
529100E 529200E 529300E
Pro Minerals Inc.
Generated by J. Warne
529400E
--,. ';100 N
'"
w

o
z
'"
w

Z
s
OWG': CAOO6<lSCPLANRESEW
13217
9699
6491
4830
4095
3645
3108
2624
2130
67'
Rx: IRIS Elrec-Pro, Tx: Phoenix IPl-1
Array: Gradient, AS = 800m, MN = 12.5m
Operators: J. Warne
PLOTTING PARAMETERS
Gridding: Bi-directional
Contours: Logarithmic, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 5, 7,.
Colour Zoning: Equal Area (resis.tbl)
Resisti vit y
ohm-m
25 0

25
Scale 1 :2500
50 75
(meters)
NADBJIUTMzone 17N
100 125 150
,
PRO MINERALS INC.
CLAIM 04202823
Cairo Twp. , ON
RESISTIVITY PLAN MAP
Contoured Apparent Resistivity
Ouantec
Geoscience
SurvvyW" P"",e Ued by:
QUANTEC GEOSCIENCE L TO.
5825 Ki ng Street
Porcupine, ON PON fCO
3.4 3.7 4.0 4.3 4.6 5.1 5.4 6.0 6.B 7.B B.3 B.7 9.0
, , , , I I , ,
25
Chargeabililty
mVN
o 25 50 75
--------
(meters)
CAIRO TOWNSHIP
Apparent Chargeability
Quantec Geoscience Ltd
976 2200 2852 3863 5786
25
, I I
Resisitivity
ohm-m
o 25 50
--- -
75
--- -
(meters)
CAIRO TOWNSHIP
Apparent Resistivity
976 2200 2852 3863 5786
25
, I I
Resisitivity
ohm-m
o 25 50
--- -
75
--- -
(meters)
CAIRO TOWNSHIP
Apparent Resistivity
3.4 3.7 4.0 4.3 4.6 5.1 5.4 6.0 6.B 7.B B.3 B.7 9.0
, , , , I I , ,
25
Chargeabililty
mVN
o 25 50 75
--------
(meters)
CAIRO TOWNSHIP
Apparent Chargeability
- - ----- - - ------ -----
,_._- -
I
I
I
/ I
I
/
I i
I
,
,
I
,
i
I

I
I
I
'".
I
I ''"

I
I
1

r---
I
"""
I
LIOO S
I
I
, L151l S
/
I
,
I

I
/
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/
I
I
I
II 8
o
..
,.
, .

of
!
if
"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--- - - - - --
I
I
/'

I
/'
/'
I
/'
/'
/'
I
/'
l,.-/

I"'"

"
528500E 529000E 529500E
Pro Minerals Inc.
Map Generated by J. Warn ..
'"
w
-
'" a
a
a
Z
- - ------ -- - -------1jl
I
I
I
I
'" I
w
-
!
I
I
I
'"
w
i -w
i
'"
a
a
Z
'"
w
-w
i
a
a
a
Z
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--- ----- -
- -------tb
530000E 530500E
DWG t , CA00645C_PLAN-CLAIM$
Claim Boundary
'00
---------
----
Scale 1 :5000
"0
(meters)
NAD831 UTM zone 17N
200
PRO MINERALS INC.
CLAIM 04202823
Cairo Twp. , ON
CLAIM LOCATION MAP
Time Domain IP/Resi stivi t y SURVEY
Survey Grid location
300

SUN"yed & Processed by:
Geoscience
QUANTEC GEOSCIENCE L TO.
5825 King Street
Survey Date: April, 2009 Project Ref. #: CA00645C Approved by: JW

20006265

Transféré par

Informations du document

Description originale:

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

20006265

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Quantec Geoscience Ltd.

processing and mapping system.

.gdb format Data-

.pdf file format.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi