Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 10

International Registered Mail Number:

Common-Law Trust Declaration; Revocation; Rescission Public Notice Public Record OVERSTANDING Jurisdiction; Are you in the U.S.? UUNITED STATES defined: This term has several meanings. It may be merely the name of a sovereign occupying the position analogous to that of other sovereigns in family of nations, it may designate territory over which sovereignty of United States extends, or it may be collective name of the states which are united by and under the Constitution. Hooven & Allison Co. v. Evatt, U.S.Ohio, 324 U.S. 652, 65 S.Ct. 870, 880, 89 L.Ed. 1252. Blacks Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 1533) IN PERSONAM defined: [Latin, Against the person.] A lawsuit seeking a judgment to be enforceable specifically against an individual person. An in personam action can affect the defendant's personal rights and interests and substantially all of his or her property. It is based on the authority of the court, or jurisdiction, over the person as an individual rather than jurisdiction over specific property owned by the person. This contrasts with in rem jurisdiction, or actions that are limited to property of the defendant that is within the control of the court. A court with in personam jurisdiction in a particular case has enough power over the defendant and his or her property to grant a judgment affecting the defendant in almost any way. West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved. Jurisdiction is venue. What is your address? Do you possess a STATEs drivers license; do you possess a STATEs I.D. card? Does the STATEs drivers license have a 2-letter code and 5 number code; does the STATEs I.D. card have a 2-letter code and 5 number code? What NAME; ADDRESS; CITY; STATE; COUNTRY is on correspondence received from any corporation, e.g. CITY; COUNTY; STATE; TOWNSHIP; COURT; UTILITY; etc.? Is it from the U.S.A.? Does it have a postage stamp on it? Does it have the name of the country of origin? The NAME; ADDRESS; CITY; STATE; COUNTY; 2-letter code and the 5 number code all are creations of the U.S. CORPORATION, they own what they create. The U.S. has jurisdiction over PERSONS, RESIDENTS, thus IN REM STATUTORY ACTIONS against RES, the things they created. The "NAME" on the "STATE BIRTH CERTIFICATE" is the CITIZEN/RESIDENT also a "derivative" of the true Christian Appellation (name given at birth). CHRISTIAN NAME defined: The baptismal name as distinct from the surname. The name, which is given one after his birth or at baptism, or is afterward assumed by him in addition to his family name. Such name may consist of a single letter. Blacks Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 241) VENUE JURISDICTION defined: Power of the particular court to function. Brand v. Pennsylvania R. Co., D.C.Pa., 22 F.Supp. 569, 571. See also Venue. Blacks Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 1557)

International Registered Mail Number:

VENUE FACTS defined: Facts to be established at hearing on plea of privilege. Central Motor Co. v. Roberson, Tex.Civ. App., 139 S.W.2d 287, 289. Facts, which by statute constitute an exception to the general right of a defendant to be sued in the county of his residence Crawford v. Sanger,Tex.Civ.App.,160 S.W.2d 115,116. Blacks Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 1557) VENUE defined: Formerly spelled visne. In common law pleading and practice, a neighborhood; the neighborhood, place, or county in which an injury is declared to have been done, or fact declared to have happened. 3 Bl. Comm. 294. The particular county, or geographical area, in which a court with jurisdiction may hear and determine a case. Venue deals with locality of suit, that is, with question of which court, or courts, of those that possess adequate personal and subject matter jurisdiction may hear the specific suit in question. Japan Gas Lighter Ass'n v. Ronson Corp.,D.C.N.J.,257 F.Supp. 219,224. It relates only to place where or territory within which either party may require case to be tried. Leege v. Strand,384 P.2d 665,668. It has relation to convenience of litigants and may be waived or laid by consent of parties. Iselin v. La Coste,C.C.A.La.,147 F.2d 791,795. In the federal courts, the term refers to the district in which the suit is brought. Venue may be determined by where the action arose or where the parties reside or conduct their business. The venue statute for civil actions in federal district courts is 28 U.S.C.A. 1391. In federal cases the prosecutor's discretion regarding the location of the prosecution is limited by Article III, 2,U.S.Const.,which requires trial in the state where the offense "shall have been committed," and the Sixth Amendment, which guarantees an impartial jury "of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed." See also Federal criminal cases, below. Venue does not refer to jurisdiction at all. Arganbright v. Good,46 Cal.App.2d Supp. 877,116 P.2d 186. "Jurisdiction" of the court means the inherent power to decide a case, whereas "venue" designates the particular county or city in which a court with jurisdiction may hear and determine the case. Village of Oakdale v. Ferrante, 44 Ohio App.2d 318, 338 N.E.2d 767, 769. As such, while a defect in venue may be waived by the parties, lack of jurisdiction may not. See also Change of venue; Forum conveniens; Forum non conveniens. Federal criminal cases. Except as otherwise permitted by statute or by the rules, the prosecution shall be had in a district in which the offense was committed. The court shall fix the place of trial within the district with due regard to the convenience of the defendant and the witnesses. Fed.R.Crim.P. 18 et seq. Blacks Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 1557) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA defined: A territory situated on the Potomac river, and being the seat of government of the United States. It was originally ten miles square, and was composed of portions of Maryland and Virginia ceded by those states to the United States; but in 1846 the tract coming from Virginia was retroceded. Legally it is neither a state nor a territory, but is made subject, by the Constitution, to the exclusive jurisdiction of Congress. Blacks Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 476) Income taxes were around long before the 16th amendment. It took a Supreme Court decision to narrow it down to who exactly is legally taxable. It turns out that ONLY government employee's are subject to

International Registered Mail Number:

the income tax. It was sort of a kickback to the government. But it could only be applied to income that the employee earned from his job with the government. Well, Congress wanted to tax all the employee's income from all the other places where the employee was earning money. Which was a considerable amount. The only way to change a Supreme Court ruling is to change the underlying laws that created the ruling. So, the Congress enacted the 16 Amendment. Making it now legal to tax all income from their employee's. The 16th does not mention who was liable for these taxes because the Supreme Court had already ruled who was. ONLY; government employees. Those that had actually taken an oath to the government. IF it could be a crime for a freeman to willfully fail to file or pay his taxes there HAD to be a time when he took an oath to be a government employee. Because in the U.S. the crime of failure to file may only exist under the broad category of perjury (of oath). Period, no exceptions. So, if you were not a government employee the government employed a trick to get you to pay taxes was to make you a government employee without you knowing. Because they know good & well if you knew the truth about their schemes there would be no way on earth you would pay all those taxes every year. Through signing a 1040 income tax form (self-assessment informational report) you actually make the statement that you are indeed a government employee. Its hidden in plain sight at the bottom of the form. Through signing you declare that it was true that you were under penalties of perjury. Yet, you can't be under penalties of perjury unless you have taken an oath? In this case the oath you took to become a government employee? It doesn't matter to the U.S. Corporation if you have actually taken the oath, it only matters that you have declared you took the oath, and you signed your returns stating you did. They got you, and its all quite legal. Now they can tax you as much as they want. Some pretty sly stuff huh? The Constitution also states that you cannot be tried and penalized more than once for the same crime. You can't even be placed in jeopardy of penalty a second time. Except if you're a government employee with a charge of perjury. Notice that penalties is plural on the tax form. So as a government employee, which through the act of signing the 1040 would presume you have become, can be tried and penalized multiple times for the same crime. You've been tricked into signing tax forms under the penalties of perjury clause. Yet, if you are not a government employee you are NOT under any oath that would enable you to commit a perjury in the first instance. Again, pretty sly stuff huh? Slight of hand at its best. All this because you trusted that government would not try to deceive you, you signed the tax form, stating there was jurisdiction when in reality there was none at all. How could there be? You never took swore an oath? Once you have signed your first 1040 form the government will forever believe that you are a civil servant (government employee). Even though they know you're not. And if you stop signing those forms, while you

International Registered Mail Number:

are still earning an income, you will be charged with willful failure to file. A crime of doing nothing when commanded to do something. Just like the good old days back in England with the King. There has never been a criminal trial in any manner under the federal income tax without a SIGNED tax form in evidence against the defendant. By signing the perjury clause on the tax form the defendant swore he was a government employee and that he took the oath that all government employees must take to become a government employee. Also, by signing that form he can be charged multiple times for the same crime (perjury). Ah, the benefits of being a government employee. In order to clear-up the whole matter, all the defendant would have to do is take the stand and swear under oath that he was NOT a government employee and that he has NEVER taken an oath of government employment. However, the court is in an odd position here. Being a government employee is a matter of public record. There would have to be a sworn statement (record) somewhere by the defendant that he took the oath somewhere in the past. Of course the judge already knows there is no such record. And if he allows the defendant to testify to that FACT its an automatic perjury. Two opposing oaths by the same individual. Whats a judge to do??? He becomes very absent-minded. He conveniently forgets to swear the defendant in when he's on the witness stand. Of course, if the defendant is never sworn in there's only one official statement on record. The perjury clause on the tax form. Guilty as charged. It is of paramount importance to the government that the truth never becomes a part of the official record. They MUST keep the defendant from testifying under oath, on the record. They will go to great lengths to accomplish this. Yes, paying income taxes is voluntary. You have to voluntarily swear the oath of being a government employee. No one can coerce you into doing that. It has to be of your own free will. Once you sign the oath the voluntary part of it is over. You HAVE to pay. It is your sworn duty to pay. You unknowingly took an oath that made you a government employee. And they won't allow you to testify in court that you are not a government employee. Of course thats fraud in its finest form. The same exact system that was around 400 years ago. The same system that made everybody flee to this country to get away from. The same system that our own Constitution was built around to avoid. But youre an honest man and honest men are obligated to correct their mistakes so I suppose you could write to the head of the IRS (Jack Lew d/b/a/ the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury) and outline the mistake you made signing the form and promise to never make that mistake again. Stating clearly that you are NOT a government employee and have never taken an oath of government service, now that you over-stand the definitions of the words you most certainly ARENT under penalties of perjury because you are NOT a government employee. The IRS is in-deed bound by law and are obligated to perform according to the rules. I advocate truth. There is no harm in writing to them regarding the truth about your supposed government employment. The term jurisdiction must be over-stood by the people. It must be

International Registered Mail Number:

over-stood in its historical context. Jurisdiction is a simple matter. You either take an oath to do something or you dont take an oath to do something. No one can coerce you into taking an oath it HAS to be voluntary. In every situation where a government attempts to compel an oath, or fails to protect the honest man who refuses it, the result is chaos. That government proves itself incapable of any claimed power. The only purpose of any government should be to defend the people that established it. All of the people. And not because the people owe that government any duty or allegiance. But for the opposite reason. Because the government owe the people its duties and obligations of good faith and allegiance under the LAW. America came close to that concept for quite a few decades. Then our elected officials sold out to the bankers who knew they could fool all of the people some of the time regarding oaths and jurisdiction. Thus, we are deceived. Not only by our government but also the church, who says that lawful' oaths are okay. Yet, Christ, himself said, take no oaths for you cannot serve two masters. Kind of ironic isn't it. Most of this country is Christian. Even most of those in public office are Christians. Of course the Kings of old were Christians too. Makes you wonder? Meanwhile, we have chaos in this country. The IRS code is blatantly chaotic. No two people can interpret it the same way. And the rest of the government is getting to be the same way with all the cover-ups and covert operations. The public (government) schools go to great lengths to dumb down the kids. Teaching them that government is not to be questioned, that government is their friend. Ignorance is indeed bliss if you are a government official doing the governing. The last thing the government wants are informed people, smart people, with awareness that holds its government officials to the truth. It would only take about 2% of the people to over-stand what's written here to eliminate the income tax. The social engineers have done an excellent job putting the people in fear (un-knowing). 400 years ago the people fled Europe to get away from the very things that are now so commonplace in present U.S. operations. UNDERSTANDING defined: In the law of contracts, an agreement. An implied agreement resulting from the express terms of another agreement, whether written or oral An informal agreement, or a concurrence as to its terms. A valid contract engagement of a somewhat informal character. This is a loose and ambiguous term, unless it be accompanied by some expression to show that it constituted a meeting of the minds of parties upon something respecting which they intended to be bound. See Agreement; Contract. Blacks Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 1526) UNDERSTOOD defined: The phrase "it is understood," when employed as a word of contract in a written agreement, has the same general force as the words "it is agreed." Blacks Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 1526)

International Registered Mail Number:

Below please find: Declaration; Revocation; Rescission Sample Notice Declaration; Revocation; Rescission Sui Juris known as John of the genealogy of Doe, Bailor; "declare that through this notice I am rescinding, removing, revoking, in addition to cancellation of my signature, on all documents held by or in the possession of the U.S. Corporation, including but not limited to all departments, offices, agencies, officials, officers, agents, and or assigns operating by; with; or through the U.S. Corporation all agents, and all agents of the Crown with the title of Nobility of Esquire for commercial fraud, deceptive practice and failure of full disclosure. Any false representation of material facts made with knowledge of falsity and with intent that it shall be acted on by another in entering into contract, and which is so acted upon, constitutes fraud, and entitles party deceived to avoid contract or recover damages. Barnsdall Refining Corn, v. Birnam Wood Oil Co., 92 F 26 817. Revocation of Power of Attorney Sui Juris known as: John of the genealogy of Doe freeborn on the land, Bailor, hereby extinguish, rescind, revoke, cancel, abrogate, annul, nullify, discharge, and make void, ab initio, all signatures and/or autographs, allegedly representing me (freeborn spiritual being) on any, all documents; papers; forms; applications; etc. that provided any power of attorney, real and implied, connected to the JOHN DOE Bailee originating in the U.S. including but not limited to all department, offices, agencies, officials, officers, agents and or assigns, foreign corporations operating inclusively as private foreign business corporation for profit. Any alleged consent and any implied quasi contracts provided by alleged consent and any implied quasi contracts provided by JOHN DOE Bailee to the corporate actors, are revoked, and are without force and effect. I further revoke, rescind, and make void, ab initio, all powers of attorney pertaining to all the aforementioned together with all governmental/quasi/colorable agencies and/or Departments created by and through the foreign corporation known as the UNITED STATES (U.S.). RESCISSIO defined: Lat. In the civil law, an annulling; avoiding, or making void; abrogation; rescission. Blacks Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 1306) REVOCATION defined: The withdrawal or recall of some power, authority, or thing granted, or a destroying or making void of some will, deed, or offer that had been valid until revoked. In contract law, the withdrawal by the offeree of an offer that had been valid until withdrawn. It may be either general, all acts and things done before; or special, revoking a particular thing. Revocation by act of the party is an intentional or voluntary revocation. The principal instances occur in the case of authorities and powers of attorney and wills. In contract law, the withdrawal of an offer by an offeror; unless the offer is irrevocable, it can be revoked at any time prior to acceptance without liability. In criminal law, may refer to termination of a probation or parole order because of either a rule violation or a new offense, and forcing the offender to begin or continue serving his or

International Registered Mail Number:

her sentence. A revocation in law, or constructive revocation, is produced by a rule of law, irrespectively of the intention of the parties. Thus, a power of attorney is in general revoked by the death of the principal. See also Abrogation; Cancel; Cancellation; Rescind. Blacks Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 1321) RESCISSION OF CONTRACT defined: To abrogate, annul, avoid, or cancel a contract; particularly, nullifying a contract by the act of a party. The right of rescission is the right to cancel (rescind) a contract upon the occurrence of certain kinds of default by the other contracting party. To declare a contract void in its inception and to put an end to it as though it never were. Russell v. Stephens, 191 Wash. 314, 71 P.2d 30, 31. A "rescission" amounts to the unmaking of a contract, or an undoing of it from the beginning, and not merely a termination, and it may be effected by mutual agreement of parties, or by one of the parties declaring rescission of contract without consent of other if a legally sufficient ground therefor exists, or by applying to courts for a decree of rescission. Abdallah, Inc. v. Martin, 242 Minn. 416, 65 N.W.2d 641, 644. It necessarily involves a repudiation of the contract and a refusal of the moving party to be further bound by it. Nonetheless, not every default in a contract will give rise to a right of rescission. See also Cancellation; Renunciation; Repudiation; Revocation; Termination. An action of an equitable nature in which a party seeks to be relieved of his obligations under a contract on the grounds of mutual mistake, fraud, impossibility, etc. Blacks Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 1306, 1307) IN RERUM NATURA defined: In the nature of things; in the realm of actuality; in existence. In a dilatory plea, an allegation that the plaintiff is not in rerum natura is equivalent to averring that the person named is fictitious. Bl.Comm. 30l. Blacks Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 794) UNKNOWN PERSONS defined: Persons whose identities cannot be ascertained. Blacks Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 1536) Sui Juris, known as: John, of the genealogy of Doe, freeborn spiritual being on the land state the facts contained herein are true, correct, complete, and not misleading, to the best of my personal first hand knowledge and belief. Being of sound mind, competent, over the age of 18. This my free will, voluntary act and deed to make, execute, seal, acknowledge and deliver under my hand and seal with explicit reservation of all my unalienable rights and my specific common law right not to be bound by any contract or obligation which I have not entered into knowingly, willingly, voluntarily, and without misrepresentation, duress, or coercion, whereby I did not sign nor consent. I am not now nor have ever been a CITIZEN nor a U.S. Citizen nor a Fourteenth Amendment Federal Citizen nor Employee, I am not bound by sworn oath or oath of office. Whereas I hereby disclaim Clauses One and Two of Section One to the Fourteenth Amendment, together with Article Four Section Three Clause Two. I do hereby certify, verify, state, claim and declare forever without abandonment; Real Property (on Earth); Personal Property (body); and Ecclesiastical Property (soul) together with all trusts, probate, rights, titles, interests droit, droit both absolute and contingent, Without the U.S. Should this not be true then let the record be corrected or it will stand as truth. Time is of the essence.

International Registered Mail Number:

Veracity; In my Private Capacity as General Executor/Eecutrix of said Cestui Que Trust account Droit, Droit, This serves Notice that your offer has been Accepted as Valuable Consideration and Returned for Value. This property is Exempt from Levy. Please Adjust this Account for the Proceeds, Products, Accounts and Fixtures and Release The Order(s) of The Court to Me Immediately. Make adjustment and close this account immediately, with prejudice. I accept your Oath, Oath of Office Security Agreement, Constitutions as by-laws, and Malfeasance Bond and place you in the Private commencing this self-executing binding contract between you and I. Further, I appoint you trustee Fully Personally Liable Now on your honor and solemn Oath to perform your obligations and duties to Protect My un-a-lien-able Rights in your Fiduciary Capacity against any and all claims, legal actions, orders, warrants, judgments, demands, liabilities, losses, foreclosure, depositions, summonses, lawsuits, costs, fines, liens, levies, penalties, taxes, damages, interests, and expenses whatsoever, both absolute and contingent, as are due and as might become due, now existing and as might hereafter arise, and as might be suffered by, imposed on, and incurred by Debtor for any and every reason, purpose, and cause whatsoever. Please honor Obligation of Good Faith in Performance of your Duties. Quid Pro Quos, an equal exchange or substitution. This my free will, voluntary act and deed true and lawful attorney-infact to make, execute, seal, acknowledge and deliver under my hand and seal, explicitly reserving all rights without prejudice; By:__________________________________________
Sui Juris known as; John of the genealogy of Doe Bailor for JOHN DOE Bailee

___________________________________________
Ran, Roe Third Party Witness "Sealed and delivered in the presence of us."

___________________________________________
James, Roe Third Party Witness "Sealed and delivered in the presence of us."

STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ) SS: COUNTY OF COO ) CERTIFICATE OF AC NO!LE"#MENT On t$is date t$e indi%idual named abo%e& in $is'$er stated (a)a(it*& )ersonall* a))eared be+ore me to e,e(ute t$is a(-no.ledgement t$at t$is instrument .as signed& sealed& and deli%ered as t$eir +ree .ill& %oluntar* a(t and deed to ma-e& e,e(ute& seal& a(-no.ledge and deli%er under t$eir $and and seal %eri+ied and aut$enti(ated +or t$e uses and )ur)oses t$erein mentioned/ 000000000000000000000 "ATE AFFI3 NOTARY SEAL IF RE4UIRE" 000000000000000000000000000000000 Signature o+ NOTARY 1U2LIC "ate Commission E,)ires 000000000000000000

NOTICE: 1ubli( a(ts de+ined: are t$ose .$i($ $a%e a )ubli( aut$orit*& and .$i($ $a%e been made be+ore )ubli( o++i(ers& are aut$ori5ed b* a )ubli( seal& $a%e been made )ubli( b* t$e aut$orit* o+ a magistrate& or .$i($ $a%e been e,tra(ted and been )ro)erl* aut$enti(ated +rom )ubli( re(ords/ 2la(-6s La. "i(tionar*

International Registered Mail Number: Si,t$ Edition 7)age 89)

Sample Return to: General Delivery Letter Notice To Whom It May Concern: Please kindly correct your records to reflect return location: Return to: Sui Juris known as John of the genealogy of Doe General Delivery c/o Main Post Office Non-Domestic Tucson Arizona united States of America (U.S.A.) without the U.S. Since the use of ZIP is not required (see zip not required [DMM 602 1.3e (2)] Domestic Mail Manual Service Regulations, the U.S. Postal Service cannot discriminate against the non-use of ZIP codes, pursuant to the Postal Reorganization Act, Section 403 (Public Law 91-375) The U.S. attempts to assert jurisdiction by sending letters with ZIP codes, when jurisdiction would otherwise be lacking. The receipt and "acceptance" of mail with ZIP codes is one of the presumptions for the Internal Revenue Service, in particular, to presume jurisdiction to send notices. In fact, the IRS has adopted ZIP code areas as "Internal Revenue Districts." See the Federal Register, Volume 51, Number 53, for Wednesday, March 19, 1986. The U.S. Corp. cannot bill a non-U.S. Citizen because such a non-U.S. Citizen is not within the purview of the District of Columbia, its Jurisdiction, territories, possessions or enclaves. As a group, these areas are now uniquely and collectively identified as "the federal zone," as explained in the book entitled The Federal Zone: Cracking the Code of Internal Revenue, San Rafael, Account for Better Citizenship, 1992. Your immediate cooperation in this matter will be most appreciated. Thank you in advance for your cooperation and understanding. This my free will, voluntary act and deed true and lawful attorney-infact to make, execute, seal, acknowledge and deliver under my hand and seal, explicitly reserving all rights without prejudice;

By:__________________________________________ Sui Juris known as; John of the genealogy of Doe Bailor

International Registered Mail Number:

10

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi