Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
April 2013
Topics
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Factors Considered for Salary Review Performance Evaluation Guidelines Salary Increment Salary Correction linked to Industry benchmarks Process Timeline and Communication
GDP
4.9%
6.9%
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Top Achievement Higher Achievement Full Achievement Partial Achievement Unsatisfactory Achievement
Note : 22% Employees were rated as Top / Higher Achievement Vs. the Ideal rating percentage guideline of 15% The above curve is an outcome of the ratings given by managers
Salary Increment
Compensation Philosophy
Move away from flat increment based approach to a differential range based
increments.
Enhanced and more accurate alignment between compensation and performance in the
role. Performance level based increments.
Line functions to play key role in compensation decisions, thereby taking Line manager
as People Manager initiative to next level.
PMS Rating
Date of Joining
PMS Rating
PMS Rating
New in Position
No increment
( 15 months next Year )
Increment
Employees who joined in Q1, 2 & 3 of 2012 were evaluated as a part of the PMP process Those Joining in Q4 -2012 ( less than 3 months service ) were given a New in position rating Those with a joining date in Q-4, 2011 have been given a prorated increase for their tenures in last quarter of 2011 Increments prorated based on tenure ( for those joining during the year ) Q4 2012 joiners will get 15 months (or prorated from DOJ increment in April 2014
October 30, 2007 SKF Group Slide 13
1. Eligibility
If salary is below market benchmark Completed minimum 2 full PMP cycles in SKF with consistency in good
performance levels
Summary
Effective 01 April 2013
Increments