Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 1

EME1226 WORKSHOP TECHNOLOGY - ASSESSMENT SCHEME FOR LAB REPORT POINT RANGE Section Documentation Submission page, Title

page, Abstract, Table of contents, List of Figures/Tables, References. Excellent 10 to 9 Good 8 to 6 Fair 5 to 3 Poor 2 to 0 Selected Point Weight Total Point

All required documentation are placed in a logical order and the Most documentation are placed way they are presented in a logical order and can keep effectively keeps the interest of the interest of the reader. the reader.

Most of the documentation were Only a few of the required not included and are not in a documentation are included and logical or expected order. The as a result the interest of the reader would have difficulty reader is affected. keeping interest in the report.

0.20

0.00

Introduction.

The introduction states the main The introduction clearly states The introduction is inviting, states topic, but does not adequately There is no clear introduction of the main topic and previews the the main topic and previews the preview the structure of the the main topic or structure of the structure of the paper, but is not structure of the report. paper or particularly inviting to report. particularly inviting to the reader. the reader.

0.10

0.00

Theoretical Background, Experimental methods.

Excellent and indepth review of the theories involved in the experiment. Excellent and clear explanations of the steps and methods used in the experiment.

Satisfactory review of the Good review of the theories theories involved in the involved in the experiment. Good experiment. Satisfactory explanations on the steps and explanations of the steps and methods used in the experiment. methods used in the experiment.

Poor review of the theories involved in the experiment. Insufficient explanations of the steps and methods used in the experiment.

0.20

0.00

Observations, Discussions.

Clear and effective explanation detailing the observations made of the processes involved during the experiment. Excellent discussion on the processes and results of the experiment.

Good explanation on the observations made of the processes involved during the experiment. Good discussion on the processes and results of the experiment.

Satisfacory explanation on the observations made of the processes involved during the experiment. Satisfactory and sufficient discussion on the processes and results of the experiment.

Poor explanation on the observations made of the processes involved during the experiment. Poor discussion on the processes or results of the experiment.

0.25

0.00

Conclusion, Recommendations.

The conclusion is strong and leaves the reader with a feeling that they understand what the writer is "getting at." Strong and solid recommendations are given.

The conclusion is good and leaves the reader with a feeling that they understand what the writer is "getting at." Good recommendations are given.

The conclusion is satisfactory. The conclusion is poor. No Sufficient recommendations are recommendations are given. given.

0.25

0.00

0.00