Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 1

PAMINTUAN v. CA G.R. No. L-26339, December 14, 1979. 94 Ph !. ""6 A#UIN$, %. &ACT'( M)r )*o P)m *+,)* -).

* )* )/reeme*+ - +h 0, P */ 1,* Co., I*c. +o .e!! 2!).+ c .hee+ */. m2or+e3 b4 +he 5ormer 5rom %)2)* +hro,/h ) b)r+er ! ce*.e he h)3 5or +he e62or+ o5 -h +e 5! *+ cor* +o To4o Me*7) 1) .h), L+3. 8h !e +he 2!).+ c .hee+ */. -ere )rr v */ * M)* !), P)m *+,)* *5orme3 +he Pre. 3e*+ o5 0, P */ 1,* +h)+ he -). * 3 re *ee3 o5 c).h )*3 re9,e.+e3 +h)+ he be 2) 3 mme3 )+e!4 5or +he 2!).+ c .hee+ */.. Co*.e9,e*+!4, +he +-o 2)r+ e. 5 6e3 ) 2r ce +o +he 2!).+ c .hee+ */. re/)r3!e.. o5 +he 7 *3, 9,)! +4 or )c+,)! *vo ce v)!,e +hereo5 )*3 b).e3 + o* 3 v 3 */ +he +o+)! 2r ce o5 +he .h 2me*+ - +h +. )//re/)+e 9,)*+ +4. A5+er +he .h 2me*+. )rr ve3 * M)* !) :4 .h 2me*+. * +o+)!;, P)m *+,)* o*!4 3e! vere3 ) 2or+ o* or 224, 1"< 4)r3. o5 +he e62ec+e3 339, 44< 4)r3. o5 2!).+ c .hee+ */. he rece ve3 +o 0, P */ 1,*=. -)reho,.e. &,r+hermore, he 3e! vere3 2!).+ c .hee+ */. o5 *5er or 9,)! +4 +h)+ -ere v)!,e3 )+ ) !e..er 2r ce +h)* -h)+ 0, P */ 1,* h)3 2) 3. ',b.e9,e*+!4, 0, P */ 1,* 5 !e3 )* )c+ o* +o e*5orce ) 2rov . o* * +he r co*+r)c+ o5 .)!e -h ch .+)+e. +h)+ )*4 v o!)+ o* o5 +he .+ 2,!)+ o*. o5 +h)+ co*+r)c+ -o,!3 e*+ +!e +he )//r eve3 2)r+4 +o ! 9, 3)+e3 3)m)/e. * +he )mo,*+ o5 1<, <<< Ph2 5rom +he o55e*3 */ 2)r+4. I''U>( 8he+her or *o+ com2e*.)+or4 3)m)/e. m)4 be )-)r3e3 5or bre)ch o5 ) co*+r)c+ o5 .)!e * )33 + o* +o ! 9, 3)+e3 3)m)/e.?.+ 2,!)+e3 2e*)!+4 * +he .) 3 co*+r)c+. @>LD( 0e., com2e*.)+or4 3)m)/e. m)4 be )-)r3e3 5or bre)ch o5 ) co*+r)c+ o5 .)!e * )33 + o* +o ! 9, 3)+e3 3)m)/e.?.+ 2,!)+e3 2e*)!+4 * +he .) 3 co*+r)c+. P)r)/r)2h 1 o5 Ar+ c!e 1226 o5 +he Ne- C v ! Co3e .+)+e. +h)+( AIn obligations with a penal clause, the penalty shall substitute the indemnity for damages and the payment of interests in case of noncompliance, if there is no stipulation to the contrary. Nevertheless, damages shall be paid if the obligor re5,.e. +o 2)4 +he 2e*)!+4 or is guilty of fraud in the fulfillment of the obligation.B Th,., ). ) /e*er)! r,!e, +he 2e*)!+4 +)7e. +he 2!)ce o5 +he *3em* +4 5or 3)m)/e. )*3 +he 2)4me*+ o5 *+ere.+. @o-ever +here )re e6ce2+ o*. +o +h . r,!e ,*3er +he C v ! Co3e, )*3 o*e o5 +hem .C -he* +he ob! /or . /, !+4 o5 5r),3 * +he 5,!5 !!me*+ o5 +he ob! /)+ o*, *3em* +4 5or 3)m)/e. m)4 be )-)r3e3 * )33 + o* +o )*3 )2)r+ 5rom +he 2e*)!+4 .+ 2,!)+e3. The factual findings of the lower courts that Pamintuan was guilty of fraud because he did not make a complete delivery of the plastic sheetings and he overpriced the same is conclusive upon the Supreme Court. ence, based on this fact, Pamintuan should pay damages. owever, in case of fraud the creditor !in this case "u Ping #un$, in addition to and apart from the stipulated penalty, may only recover the difference between the actual proven damages and the stipulated penalty.