Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Fall 2005
t [0, 2 ].
Denition.
u dx + v dy =
def
In other words, just as with complex line integrals, you just substitute the parameterization of the curve into the symbols in the left-hand integral to dene an ordinary Riemann integral on the right. Example 2. Let be the quarter of the unit circle in the rst quadrant, from 1 to (1 + i)/ 2. Compute y dx + x dy . Solution. Parameterize , say by x = cos t, y = sin t, Thus dx = sin t dt and dy = cos t dt, so
/4
0 t /4.
y dx + x dy =
def
( sin2 t + cos2 t) dt
t=0 /4
=
t=0
1 /4 sin 2t|0 2
= =
Physical interpretation. Recall from Calculus III that if F = ui + v j is a force eld dened on , and we write dR = dxi + dy j, then F dR can be though of as the work done in by the force eld in pushing a particle over through a displacement dR, and u dx + v dy =
F dR
is then the work done by F in pushing a particle over all of . 2. Real vs. Complex line integrals. The complex line integrals we studied in 1.6 can be expressed in terms of the real ones discussed above. Heres how: Suppose is a piecewise smooth curve in C and f is a complex-valued function that is continuous on an open set that contains . Suppose further that f has continuous rst partial derivatives on this open set. Write f = u + iv where u = Re f and v = Im f , so both u and v are real-valued functions that are continuous and have continuous rst partials on some open set containing . Now proceeding formally (meaning: without trying to make sense out of what were doing), we have: z = x + iy , so dz = dx + idy , hence f (z ) dz = (u + iv )(dx + idy ) = u dx v dy + i(v dx + u dy ) so (1)
f (z ) dz =
(u + iv )(dx + idy ) =
u dx v dy + i
v dx + u dy
Proof of (1). has a complex parameterization z = (t) = x(t) + iy (t), t [a, b], for which the corresponding real parameterization is x = x(t), y = y (t), Now just sort through denitions:
b
t [a, b].
f (z ) dz =
def
f ( (t)) (t) dt
t=a b
=
a b
=
a
+i
a
def
u dx v dy + i
v dx + u dy.
3. Greens Theorem. Heres the version you learned in Calc III: Suppose is a domain in R2 whose positively oriented boundary1 is a nite collection of pairwise disjoint2 piecewise continuous simple closed curves. Suppose P and Q are continuous functions dened on a larger open set, which contains both and , and suppose P and Q have continuous rst partial derivatives on this larger open set. Then: (2)
P dx + Q dy =
Q P x y
dx dy
Amusing application. Suppose and are as in the statement of Greens Theorem. Set P (x, y ) 0 and Q(x, y ) = x. Then according to Greens Theorem: x dy =
1 dx dy = area of .
Exercise 1. Find some other formulas for the area of . For example, set Q 0 and P (x, y ) = y . Can you nd one where neither P nor Q is 0? Serious application. Suppose and are as in the statement of Greens Theorem: a bounded domain in the plane and its positively oriented boundary (a nite union of simple, pairwise disjoint, piecewise continuous closed curves). Suppose f is a complex-valued function that is analytic on an open set that contains both and . Then f (z ) dz = 0.
Proof. Well use the real Greens Theorem stated above. For this write f in real and imaginary parts, f = u + iv , and use the result of 2 on each of the curves that makes up the boundary of . The result is: f (z ) dz =
I
u dx v dy +i
v dx + u dy .
II
By Greens Theorem, I=
v u + x y
dx dy
and II =
u v x y
dx dy.
Since f is analytic on , both integrands on the right sides of these equations vanish identically on , hence the integrals are zero. This completes the proof. Example 3. Suppose is the unit circle and p a complex number of modulus > 1. dz Then: = 0. zp Proof. Apply the result above with f (z ) = 1/(z p), = {z : |z | < 1}, = . Then f is analytic on a disc slightly bigger than the unit disc that doesnt contain the point p, say in the disc of radius (1 + |p|)/2, so the hypotheses of the above result are satised, hence so is the conclusion. 4. The Cauchy Integral Theorem. Suppose D is a plane domain and f a complex-valued function that is analytic on D (with f continuous on D). Suppose is a simple closed curve in D whose inside3 lies entirely in D. Then:
f (z ) dz = 0.
Proof. Apply the serious application of Greens Theorem to the special case = the inside of , = , taking the open set containing and to be D. The Cauchy Integral Formula Suppose f is analytic on a domain D (with f continuous on D), and is a simple, closed, piecewise smooth curve whose whose inside also lies in D. Then for every point p inside of : f (p) = 1 2i f (z ) dz. zp
Proof. Fix p lying inside , and let be any positive number small enough so that the disc def = {z : |z p| < } lies entirely inside of .4 Let be the positively oriented boundary of . Let be the domain that lies between and . Note that the positively oriented boundary of is , and that the function g (z ) =
def
f (z ) zp
( D\{p})
is analytic on D\{p}. Now apply the serious application of Greens Theorem proved in the last section to g , with D\{p} playing the role of the open set containing and . The result is: 0 = g (z ) dz = g (z ) dz = g (z ) dz g (z ) dz,
Recall the Jordan Curve Theorem (pp. 56-57): If is a simple closed curve in the plane, then the complement of consists of two disjoint open sets, one of which, called the outside of , is unbounded, while the other, called the inside of , is bounded.
so g (z ) dz =
g (z ) dz, f (z ) dz zp
f (z ) dz = zp
Lets reduce the right-hand side of (3) to an integral over the real interval [0, 2 ] by the complex parameterization z = (t) = p + eit , 0 t 2 . Then dz = ieit dt and z p = eit , so (4)
f (z ) dz = zp
2 0
f (p + eit ) dt
0
(5)
0
f (p + eit ) dt
0
f (p) dt = 2f (p)
as 0.5 Now on both sides of (3), take the limit as 0. The left-hand side does not depend on , and on the right we use (4) and (5). The result is: f (z ) dz = 2i f (p) zp
as promised. Example 4. Let be any simple closed curve in the plane, oriented positively, and p a point not on . Then: 1 dz = zp 2i if p is inside of 0 if p is outside of
Proof. The result for p inside is just Cauchys formula for f 1, while for p outside of the function f (z )/(z p) is an analytic function (of z ) on an open set containing both and its inside region. Thus the integral is zero by the Cauchy Theorem.
Here weve interchanged the limit, as 0, with the integral. This requires a separate argument, which well skip.
5
Example 5. Suppose is the unit circle, oriented counter-clockwise (i.e., positively). Then applying Cauchys formula with f (z ) = sin z , we get 2 sin z dz = sin = , 4 2 z /4 while if we take f (z ) = ez , then ez dz = e1/2 z 1/2
as ranges over all simple, closed, piecewise smooth curves that do not pass through either of the points 0 or 1. Solution. There are only four possibilities: (a) Both 0 and 1 lie outside . Then the integrand is analytic in an open set containing and its inside, hence the integral is zero, by Cauchys Theorem. (b) 0 lies inside and 1 lies outside. Then Cauchys formula can be applied, with f (z ) = 1/(z 1), whereupon the integral is 2if (0) = 2i. (c) 1 lies inside and 0 lies outside. This time apply Cauchys theorem with f (z ) = 1/z . Thus the integral is 2if (1) = 2i. (d) Both 0 and 1 lie inside . Then a partial fraction expansion (which could have been used for parts (a)(c) also) shows: 1 dz = z (z 1) 1 1 + z z1 dz =
1 dz + z
1 dz z1
= 2i + 2i = 0.
(by Example 4)
1 dz , and z (z 1)(z 2) ranges through all simple, closed, piecewise smooth curves missing all of the points 0, 1, or 2. 6