Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
PL O
CRITERIA
EXCELLENT 5 marks
GOOD 3 marks
FAIR 2 marks
POOR 1 marks
EIG!TAGE
SCORE
P L O " # L E A D E R S ! I P $ T E A
Contribution In Team
Shares ideas and proposal and helps the team move forward.
Shares ideas but does not advance the work of the group.
Communication
Communicate openly and treat one another with respect. Free to seek assistance and information, share resources and insights, provide advice, or ask questions of each other.
There is a general atmosphere of respect other team members, but may not be heard as much as others. ay avoid discussing some topics for fear of disrupting the group!s work and"or hurting someone!s feelings.
Communication is limited among group members and information is not shared with one another and"or important topics are not discussed among the group.
Self#motivated and can complete work assignments and reports in a timely manner without being reminded.
$ork assignments and reports are late. %ot self# motivated and needs constant chasing to get the work submitted on time.
Leadership
& strong, clearly focused leader develops. This leader sees him " herself more responsible for helping lead the team than the other team members.
The group has no leader nor do its members share the leadership role.
M O R % S % I L L S & P L O 4 # C R I T I C A L T ! I
Team Ma ing !ecision
Clear procedures for making decisions are established and documented, when appropriate and tend to make most decisions through consensus.
'ecisions are made by individuals and not reflect the thinking or the desires of the team. There is often a failure to involve all members in the decision# making process.
"#planation of issues
(ssue"problem to be considered critically is stated clearly and described comprehensively, delivering all relevant information necessary for full understanding. *ses specific inductive or deductive reasoning to make inferences regarding premises+ addresses implications and consequences+ identifies facts and relevant information correctly.
(ssue"problem to be considered critically is stated but description leaves some terms undefined, ambiguities une)plored, boundaries undetermined, and"or backgrounds unknown. *ses superficial reasoning to make inferences regarding solutions+ Shows some confusion regarding facts, opinions, and relevant, evidence, data, or information.
Analysis
$roblem Sol%ing
Thoroughly identifies and addresses key aspects of the problem and insightfully uses facts and relevant evidence from analysis to support and defend potentially valid solutions.
(dentifies and addresses some aspects of the problem+ develops possible conclusions or solutions using some inappropriate opinions and irrelevant information from analysis.
N % I N G ' P R O B L E M S O L V I N G S % I L L S &
Conclusions and related outcomes -consequences and implications. are logical and reflect student!s informed evaluation and ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order.
Conclusion is logically tied to information -because information is chosen to fit the desired conclusion.+ some related outcomes -consequences and implications. are identified clearly.
Conclusion is inconsistently tied to some of the information discussed+ related outcomes -consequences and implications. are oversimplified.
TOTAL SCORE
(((((((((((((('
1))