Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Group
TGL Group
Reservoir
Engineering
EPT
delivering
May
2010 breakt hrough solut ions
1000
1010
July-97
Nov-96
1020
Sep-90
Rja-1:Jan-88
Rja-4:Nov-90
1030
8400
8000
8400
8800
9200
8800
9200
9600
10000
9600
10000
10400
10800
10400
10800
11200
11600
11200
11600
12000
12400
12000
12400
-1200
RJA-12
TVDSS (m)
8000
RJA-10
RJA-1
1040
-1200
One mapable
seismic horizon
Faults
x-trap analysis
RJA-2
RJA-3
1050
OWC = 1051.9 m
RJA-5
RJA-7
1060
RJA-4
RJA-6
-1400
-1400
1070
1090
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
11000
12000
13000
14000
Pressure Data
-1600
4000
-1600
1100
-1800
-1800
Figure. 6
Production Data
-2000
Data
Integration
Core
Input
-2000
Structure (PS)
Completions
SWS
Dip meter data
Analogues
External studies
Available Data
Fluvial Sand
GF Sand
Sheet Flood Sand
GD Sand
Sandy Diamectite
Muddy Diamectite
GL Mud
ALS-10H1
ALS-9H1
ALS-8H1
ALS-7H1
ALS-6H1
ALS-5H1
ALS-4H1
ALS-3H1
ALS-2H1
ALS-1H1
Structural modelling
Stratigraphic framework
Facies modelling
Property modelling
Uncertainty management
Volumetrics
Static Model
Petrophsical
evaluation (PP)
341.7
340.6
339.5
338.4
337.3
336.2
335.1
334.0
332.9
331.8
330.7
329.6
328.4
327.3
326.2
325.1
324.0
322.9
321.8
320.7
319.6
318.5
317.4
316.3
315.2
314.1
313.0
311.8
310.7
309.6
309.5
Output
Surface engineering
WE
RE Dynamic model
TGL
Group
Reservoir characterization
well data
seismic
logs
cores
reservoir simulator
structure tops
volumes
Faults
maps
porosity
oil saturation
reservoir delineation
depositional units
reservoir quality distribution
geological trends
sedimentology
petrography
RCAL
SCAL
Software
geological modelling
Data Base,
Paradigm
TGL
Group
Modelling
core analysis
log interpretation
property modelling
Geological model
(static)
reserves
production history
Reservoir Simulation
model (dynamic)
production
forecast
recompletions
structural modelling
3D seismic
log correlation
reservoir subdivision
flow modelling
SCAL
Fluid properties
Pressure data
Well test analysis
new wells
optimised
water flood
Petrel modules
Eclipse
$/bbl
TGL
Group
Production optimization
PPT Tools
decline
analysis
production history
production
forecast
Production Analyst
Block analysis
material
balance
flow modelling
Production
history,
Fluid properties
Pressure history
Well test analysis
OFM, Topaze
reporting
optimised
water flood
MBal
$/bbl
TGL Group
Capture and
characterize
opportunities
TGL Group
Study, screen
and filter out
unfeasible
opportunities
Macro screening
from the candidates
pool (ranking tools)
Surveillance plan
(Pr & inclination)
Micro screening
(BA, MBAL,
FrontSim, Geol. &
dynamic modeling))
Final candidate list
proposal
Client reps.
Approve
Capture
and
opportunities
characterize
for realization
opportunities
Approve final
candidate list
Agreed program
signed off
Performance
review
Execution planning
Drilling
Completion
Optimization
Stimulation
Client
Execute ST,
completion
Surveillance execution
(feed micro screening)
Well approval
Execution program
Execution
Training
Lessons learned
Needed:
Tools
Standards
Planning
Work process
Production
incline period
Production decline
period
Injection start
Depletion
Total fluid
Water
Secondary oil
Primary oil
Waterflood life
0-10%
5%
5-10%
15-30%
% Recovery
Waterflood analysis in mature fields (after water break through) BuckleyLeverett, Welge
2.
Arps
Fetkovich
Material balance
Recoverable reserves
3.
Ranking criteria
Compensation
Dykstra-Parson)
Reservoir pressure
Compensation
Water cut
French decline
Mechanical/Well Integrity
Compensation
Conformance plots
TGL
Group
Goal
Process
Tool
Material balance
MBAL
Excel Mat. balance
OFM Mat. balance
OFM
Excel
Composite plots
OFM
Excel
Conformance plots
OFM
Excel
OFM
Excel
Forecast of WF optimization
effects
OFM
Excel
10
Database
Geological
data, reserves
Collect/Assess
input data
Production ,
Injection data
Criteria:
Recoverable Reserves
by Field
Recoverable Reserves
by Reservoir
Recoverable
reserves
evaluation
Rank reservoirs/
Fields
Recoverable reserves
Current oil rate per block/well
Compensation
Reservoir pressure
Well count (P/I ratio)
Applicable Composite
performance plots,
petrophysics, geology
NO
Criteria:
WC >50%
HCPVI>25%
Stable well count
Stable production/
injection
Water break
through
YES
Compensation
1. Craig
2. Buckley-LeverettWelge
3. Dykstra-Parson
4. Composite
performance plots
4. Compensation
Cum copmens. By
block
<100%
I/P ratio
>100%
>50-70% IP
Curr. reservoir
pressure
WF decline curve
analysis
Conformance
plots
Areal sweep
efficiency
WOR vs Np
Displacement
sweep efficiency
(Net water
injected/MOPV
<50-70% IP
WOR vs MOPV
Water in the
ground
Deliverables:
- Candidate blocks/wells
- Incremental Production
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Mature WF phase
Fix injection
Deliverables:
- Candidate blocks/wells
- Incremental Production
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Deliverables:
- Candidate blocks/
wells
- Incremental
Production
Fractional flow
analysis
>100%
Deliverables:
- Conversions
- Fix P/I
- New drilling
Deliverables:
- Candidate blocks/wells
- Infill/New drilling areas
- Incremental Production
Deliverables:
- Candidate blocks/wells
- Changing WF patterns
- Improve sweep (gel
bright water)
Acceleration/
Improve
compensation
Effect calculation
Water fill-up
Criteria:
Block division/
analysis/ranking
1. Arps
2. Fetkovich curve
match
3. Material balance
Petrophysical
data
Depletion decline
RF
improvement/
more producers
Change sweep
efficiency
Deliverables:
- Oil incremental
- Economical effect
- Financial
memorandum
11
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
Parameters
38
Principal
Impact
Rates
Recovery
Recovery
OIIP
Rates
Recovery
Rate
Rate
Rate
Comment
poro-perm trends
analogue marine reservoirs
analogue
well test data
oil samples
SCAL
horizontal PTA's
horizontal PTA's
Estimates from analogue
Low
Median
High
0.80
0.030
3.2
855
140
0.24
0
300
0.70
1.00
0.065
4.0
861
217
0.28
0
600
0.90
1.20
0.150
4.8
865
280
0.32
3
1000
0.95
40
porosity %
Hydrodynamic model
Geological model
4
20
15
Probability
10
0
0.00
2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 2036 2038 2040
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.45
0.50
12
30000
25000
20000
15000
10000
5000
0
18-Feb-82
11-Aug-87
31-Jan-93
24-Jul-98
14-Jan-04
6-Jul-09
27-Dec-14
18-Jun-20
9-Dec-25
Log WOR vs. cum oil can be used to forecast value of oil recovery acceleration
Increased volume of water will increase volume of oil based on mass balance principle
13
Injectors
Injectors /
producer
Producers
Improve
production
efficiency
Injection
Efectivness
Fill-up
phase
Fetkovich
Darcy
Yes
Water break
through
No
Non mature
flooding
Mature
flooding
Neighborhood
characteristics
Log WOR
vs. cum oil
Depletion
Fill-up
Waterflooding
Fetkovich
Hyperbolic
decline
Fetkovich
Hyperbolic
decline
WOR vs.
cum oil
14
Compensation
Decline analysis
Welge technique
breakthrough
Value of injection
Chart/plot
Composite reservoir perfromance
plots (current and cumulative
production/injection, GOR, WC, WOR,
pressure vs. time)
ABC plot
Production heterogeneity index
Cumulative compensation vs. time
Oil rate vs. cumulative oil
WC vs. cum oil
Liquid rate vs. cumulative liquid
Log WOR vs. cum oil
RF vs. MOPV
RF vs. HCPVI
RF vs. PVI
PVI vs. time
WC vs. PVI
Cum. Water injected vs. cum. Total
fluid
Volumetric sweep efficiency
Hall plot
Conformance plots
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
RF
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
144
(2388) ; 60
3/ (10 3 10 )
149
152
155
165
171
176
, ,
145
153
10
170
11
167
.
2413 .
. ( 2396)
12
178
. ( 2396)
13
180
( 2374,5-2381,5 )
14
15
(13,14 )
(1, 6, 11 )
16
(.
144, 171, 176, 149, 187, 155)
35000
Oil rate (T/d)
Liquids rate (m3/d)
30000
25000
20000
15000
10000
5000
0
18-Feb-82
11-Aug-87
31-Jan-93
24-Jul-98
14-Jan-04
6-Jul-09
27-Dec-14
18-Jun-20
9-Dec-25
Recommendations
15
TGL Recommendations
Group
Water injection redistribution
Blocks ranking
02
1269
08
09
496
07
10
182
-40
01
03
165
725
1300
06
18
424
344
16
-22
717
04
254
506
27
15
341
536
721
19
17
296
14
05
28
25
30
155
26
580
23
13
11
-49
301
12
463
24
486
365
21
34
33
660
310
22
-107
185
30
32
-9
849
20
2535
29
35
504
906
31
-37
37
01
1300
470
-
-.
36
369
144
(2388) ; 60
3/ (10 3 10 )
149
152
155
165
171
176
, ,
145
153
10
170
167
.
2413 .
. ( 2396)
11
12
178
. ( 2396)
13
180
( 2374,5-2381,5 )
14
15
(13,14 )
(1, 6, 11 )
16
(.
144, 171, 176, 149, 187, 155)
444
447
528
446
325
445
331
341
321
511
317
448
1494
1491
453
1490
1497
1496 530
318
1492
452
327
497
332
322
495
529
454
329
1489
233
527
450
232
330
451
364
531
443
319
433