Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Career
The multinational companies emanate a certain gloss; their ideas are bright and engaging and are almost always new to Bangladesh
Talent attracts talent, and the best and brightest have quickly shifted their interest to these organisations, thus creating hyper competition and prestige for these positions. Those who are successful in obtaining roles have a sense of accomplishment matched by their colleagues, creating a sense of camaraderie and belonging not only while at office but also beyond it. The organisations are worn as a badge of honour, recognised by all those outside it which also enhances the reputation and status of the employee in the society. The injection of multinationals hasforced domestic conglomerates to look in the mirror and make due improvements. These companies are fraught with negative perceptions which are being rectified as we speak. The stigma attached to these companies is focused on the lack of transparency and the overbearing self-interest. For example, recruitment may be done on the basis of nepotism or direc-
The stigma attached to domestic companies is focused on the lack of transparency and the overbearing selfinterest
bigstock
tors quotas making an uncomfortable treaty between employees. Furthermore, historically, domestic companies have had a rigid hierarchical structure leading to a tense and complex bureaucratic processes fostering inefficiency. Most of the HR departments of the local companies recognise this problem, and this is why some of the forward looking companies like ACI Group are increasingly restructuring to establish flatter organisational structures. Beyond the environment of the domestic organisations, the benefits
package in multinationals are much more incentivised, rewarding performance through bonuses and detailed feedback for self-improvement. This facilitates progress within the multinationals at a faster rate; which in turn is the reason why when the multinationals reach out, they can always recruit the best talent in the market. The domestic benefits packages on the other hand are perceived to be owner-centric and the rewards trickle down from the success at the top of the pyramid.
Perhaps the most obvious difference between multinational companies and the local conglomerates is the brand image they possess. The multinational companies emanate a certain gloss; their ideas are bright and engaging and are almost always new to Bangladesh. These elements appeal to the next generation who have been connected to the global environment since birth. In contrast, the local companies appear bland and draconian. They are littered with whispers, sometimes shouts, of corruption and a perception that these
Multinationals have changed the expectations of the prospective workers and have set a benchmark domestic organisations are now pushing towards. This change is a must for todays graduates. l Nakibul Hoq is a Research Analyst at GradConnect, an international career information and advisory firm. You can email him at nakib@grad-connect.com. Naiian Yazdani is the Director of Strategy at GradConnect. You can email him at naiian@ grad-connect.com and find more career information at www.grad-insights.com and www.grad-connect.com
Types of conflicts
To stop conflicts, one must understand the two major kinds of conflicts that may arise at a meeting professional differences and personality clashes. Conflicts most commonly arise from professional differences in opinions, and more so when the outcome is of extreme importance. More often than not these differences never become full-fledged conflicts unless the outcome is important, the decision being made cannot be reversed, or when the decision is going to impact everyone in the meeting. Such conflicts sour working relationships when left unresolved and can fast become a different and more personal kind of conflict. Less commonly, conflicts take an uglier shape when individuals or different departments participating in a meeting do not like one another, or one group or individual feels threatened by another. These conflicts are really more to do with personality issues than with facts or professional opinions. While they can be similarly handled, the un-
When conflict happens it is best to end it at the source instead of letting it grow bigger than it needs to be. Do not simply react to a problem; address it before it becomes one
If there are attendees in the meeting who have a reputation for causing conflict, one needs to be alert from the get go. Conflicts also arise in groups where individuals struggle and vie for influence without having established effective ways of working yet. The simplest way to overcoming these problems is by introducing a number of rules. 1. All attendees will be allowed to speak only after raising their hands, or in some way signalling that they have something to contribute. 2. Everyone will be invited to contribute at the end of each individual item on the agenda, to ensure no one hijacks the discussion. 3. One person will summarise the entire meeting, to ensure that all attendees are on the same page.
bigstock
When conflict happens it is best to end it at the source instead of letting it grow bigger than it needs to be. Do not simply react to a problem; address it before it becomes one.
Sensing disagreements
Body language is the biggest giveaway for someone who is about to disagree with an issue. They may be shaking their head, rolling their eyes or fidgeting and being nervous or restless. Looking at others in the meeting to see where they stand. Staring at someone with a frown or intimidating expression. Whispering to others to seek approval for the potential disagreement. changed so that a consensus may be reached. Remove perceived threat: One of the biggest reasons that conflicts occur in a meeting is because of perceived threat. This is ubiquitous in nature animals attack when they perceive a threat. The conflict may be arising because someone may feel that the discussion is putting their position or reputation on the line, or hampering their chances of enjoying a free weekend or a festival bonus. This kind of conflict may be addressed through a strict agenda, as mentioned earlier. If everyone is on the same page as to what the meeting
seeks to discuss, what the objective is and what is expected off it, a lot of individuals may relax a little and not jump in at every speed bump. Set up another meeting: Sometimes it may come to pass that a conflict at a meeting is simply irresolvable or that it is an issue that cannot be freely discussed amidst all the current meeting participants. In this case, the conflict needs to be acknowledged, and a future meeting should be set up, preferably on the same day, to only address the issue at hand.
Conflict resolution
When your best efforts to prevent conflict have failed, you may use the following conflict resolution techniques to calm the situation. Depersonalise: Through this technique, one phrases an issue of conflict to take focus away from any individual, or group and directing it towards the issue itself. For example, instead of saying that one person is simply better at the job than another person, a better way to put it would be to say that while both persons have strengths, ones strengths are more in line for the issue at hand. The focus is directed towards the issue at hand and the individuals strengths, instead of themselves. Question: Turn every conflict into a question. Instead of allowing meeting attendees to simply state that they disagree with something, ask them to find a way out of it through research, brainstorming, etc. Ask for suggestions for how the disagreeable idea may be
Ask yourself
How can I harness the positive force of the conflict to generate better results? How can I keep it from getting personal? How can I get everyone to accept a consensus that isnt unanimous? Can I mitigate conflicts by being particular about attendees?