THE TEACHING OF DJWHAL KHUL

Book 2
ETHEREAL MECHANICS
* * * * *
THE SERIES
ESOTERIC NATURAL SCIENCE
* * * * *
The Teaching of the Master of the Trans-Himalayan Esoteric School,
Djhal !h"l# The contin"ation of $ooks of H% Bla&atsky an' (( Bailey#
Synthesis of Science an' Religion
* * * * *
TATIANA DANINA
* * * * *
The Teaching of Djhal !h"l - Ethereal Mechanics
)o*yright + 2,-. $y Tatiana Danina
Translation from R"ssian $y Tatiana Danina
(nother $ook of the series /The Teaching of Djwha Kh! "
E#o$e%ic Na$!%a Science0 & 'The (ain occ!$ aw# an) conce*$#+ &
htt*122#ama3on#com2Main-4cc"lt-5as-)once*ts-
e$ook2'*2B,,6788R92
( fragment from the $ook /New E#o$e%ic A#$%oog,0 yo" can rea'
here : htt*122r"#scri$'#com2'oc22,9;<9.=22Tatiana-Danina-The-Doctrine-of-
Djhal-!h"l->e-Esoteric-(strology
4ther $ooks of this series are *re*aring in English#
Ha**, %ea)ing-
CONTENTS
./0 1REFACE
H4? D4ES ( )4>T()T ?ITH THE TE()HER 4))7R@
,2# ?hat is ethereal mechanics@
,;# %articles Ain an' Aang# Mass an' antimass# %ositi&e an' negati&e
charges# Matter an' anti-matterB
,.# Ether filling elementary *articles : is their mo&ing factorB
,C# ?hat is a Dorce@ )lassification of DorcesB
,E# ?hy 'o elementary *articles o$ey to the action of forces@
,9# Dorce an' *ress"reB
,=# The R"le of %arallelogram for elementary *articles an' for
'ifferent ty*es of forcesB
,<# Mechanical *rocesses an' *henomena re&eal mechanical
*ro*erties of elementary *articlesB
-,# The mechanism of gra&itation FattractionGB
--# The Dorce of (ttractionB
-2# The tr"th a$o"t Dorce of (ttractionB
-;# Mass : is Diel' of (ttraction, eight : is Dorce of (ttractionB
-.# The mechanism of anti-gra&ity Fre*"lsionGB
-C# The Dorce of Re*"lsionB
-E# ?hy is anti-gra&itation still not recogni3e' $y science@
-9# Diel's of (ttraction 'ecrease Diel's of Re*"lsion, an' Diel's of
Re*"lsion re'"ces Diel's of (ttractionB
-=# Transformation of H"ality : this is a rising of tem*erat"reB
-<# Transformation of the H"ality of a *article '"ring its inertial
motionB
2,# Transformation of the H"ality $y gra&itation F6ra&ity Diel'G# The
reason for the mass 'efect, ra'ioacti&ity an' ra'iation of the starsB
2-# Transformation of the H"ality $y anti-gra&itation F(nti-
gra&itational Diel'GB
22# %henomena eI*laine' $y the 5a of TransformationB
2;# 6eneral information a$o"t inertiaB
2.# Diel' of Re*"lsion : is a com*"lsory con'ition for an emergence
of inertial motionB
2C# Dorce of InertiaB
2E# The main characteristics of the inertial motionB
29# Inertia of *articles in real con'itionsB
2=# (nalysis of the ca"ses of eH"al acceleration or of eH"al
'eceleration of inertial motionB
2<# 6eneral information a$o"t collision of *articlesB
;,# Dorce of %ress"re of the *article s"rfaceB
;-# )ollision of free *articles mo&ing $y inertiaB
;2# )ollision of a free *article ith a *article in a chemical elementB
;;# The talk a$o"t intercon&ersion of mass an' energy#
./0 1REFACE
HOW DOES A CONTACT WITH THE TEACHER OCCUR2
(ll $ooks of the series JThe Teaching of Djhal !h"l - Esoteric
nat"ral scienceJ are create' '"ring a me'itati&e contact of the 'isci*le
Fa"thorG ith the conscio"sness of the Teacher Fthe (scen'e' Master Djhal
!h"lG#
IKll try to 'escri$e this *rocess#
I F'isci*leG t"ne# I ent into a state of me'itation, mo&e aay from
earthly concerns an' start to concentrate on the theme that I ant to
"n'erstan' an' *ro*erly inter*ret for myself# 4r j"st I go into a me'itati&e
state an' in this state fin' in my min' Ja$o&eJ something like a mental
*arcel : some theme, a H"estion that reH"ires a *arsing an' concentrate'
consi'eration# Either this to*ic is knon to me or may $e entirely ne# I ill
not kno "ntil look at this# ( &ieing is almost instantaneo"s# (n' no ILm
in the nee'e' state for ork# ItKs 'esira$le that $oth the *hysical ell-$eing
is consistent to the high le&el of a mental-emotional acti&ity# Therefore, slo
alks are the most 'esira$le time for s"ch me'itati&e contacts#
If a le&el of my moti&ation is high, i#e# itKs great the 'esire to
"n'erstan' the iss"e : a comm"nication is m"ch easier, an' any noise 'i'
not interfere#
S"ch sessions are like tele*athic lessons#
The Messages from the Teacher are the tho"ght-*ackages# They
'escen' to the $rain an' $ecome a JtriggerJ to the start of thinking on this
theme#
In *arallel, I am *re*aring for them - rea' $ooks, atch the st"'ie'
*rocesses an' *henomena, &is"ali3e, me'itate on gi&en to*ics# Ho"rs an'
'ays, ho"rs an' 'ays# E&en eeks an' months ere nee'e' sometimes for
consi'eration of a single, *artic"larly 'iffic"lt iss"e# I can say that
a$sor*tion of 'etaile', $asic information on the occ"lt an' the &ario"s fiel's
of science took me a$o"t .-C years# There ere times, es*ecially in the
$eginning hen I co"l' not "n'erstan' many things# I highly straine' an'
s"ffere' hen it t"rne' $a'#
Dirst -#C years there as a kin' of a"tomatic riting# I as immerse'
into the trance state an' j"st fiIe' on the *a*er that a**eare' in the $rain# I
reali3e' all that I rote 'on# Hoe&er, I reali3e' that it as not com*letely
my tho"ghts# This *erio' as in some ay, a *re*aratory training# (n' the
most im*ortant an' interesting $egan then# D"ring this time F-#C yearsG, I
st"'ie' the metho' of *erce*tion of im*ressions sent tele*athically#
Tho"ghts of the Master ere &ery clear, energetic an' highly 'eman'ing of
imme'iate fiIation Fotherise they ill $e misse', an' they ill ha&e to $e
retransmitte'G# So I ent e&eryhere ith *ens an' note$ooks, an'
constantly rote hat ca"ses s"r*rising an' c"rio"s glances of *ro&incial
resi'ents that $y the ay 'i' not care me# 5et get "se' to the image of a
riter, I tho"ght to myself#
(s the assimilation of transferre' material, an' rea'ing of more an'
more n"m$er of scientific an' esoteric literat"re Fmore - scientificG, I
gra'"ally $ecame a f"ll mem$er of the creati&e *rocess of riting of articles
for the $ooks# Together e orke' o"t the lang"age in hich it as *ossi$le
to *ass a ne terminology necessary to 'escri$e nat"ral *henomena an'
*rocesses eIactly from o"r *oint of &ie# I say Jo"rJ - in fact, I ha&e long
ago $ecome JtheirJ, teachers, orker# Therefore, I say Jo"rJ#
By the en' of E -9- year a**renticeshi* I am so im$"e' ith the s*irit
of the ne transmitte' teachings that co"l' no itho"t a constant control
of the Teacher eI*lain most of things ha**ening in the orl'# (ny scientific
$ook $ecame for me tr"ly o*en, "nsol&a$le iss"es an' *ro$lems
'isa**eare'# E&erything has $ecome a$sol"tely clear# The 5as of
(ttraction an' Re*"lsion, Transformation an' I'entification tr"ly r"n the
sho in the "ni&erse# (t least in this "ni&erse# If to recogni3e the nat"re of
these las then yo" ill "n'erstan' the meaning of science#
.30 WHAT IS ETHEREAL MECHANICS2
In this $ook, ethereal mechanics ser&es as an alternati&e to the
quantum mechanics# (n' H"ant"m mechanics as is knon, aims to
"n'erstan' the nat"re an' the las of the $eha&ior of elementary *articles#
That ethereal mechanics seek to the same goal# (n alternati&e title : is
Mechanics of elementary *articles FSo"lsG
M"ant"m mechanics is really has fo"n' its footing in the early NN
cent"ry in connection ith the 'isco&ery of ra'ioacti&ity# The *henomenon
of ra'ioacti&ity as a *roof that s"$stances Fchemical elementsG are
com*ose' of smaller constit"ent *arts : elementary *articles# ?ith some of
the *rinci*les of H"ant"m mechanics e agree, ith others : 'oes not# In the
f"t"re, e ill talk a$o"t this in more 'etail#
In a''ition, e 'o not share the *ro*ositions of relati&istic mechanics
Fith some eIce*tionsG# ?e remin' yo" that as the $asis of relati&istic
mechanics the s*ecial theory of relati&ity, of (l$ert Einstein as lai' 'on#
In relati&istic mechanics, there is eI*resse' the &ie that o$jects of
microcosm in its mo&ement an' $eha&ior in general are s"$ject to the
entirely 'ifferent las of mechanics, rather than macrosco*ic o$jects, i#e#
allege'ly the las of classical mechanics canKt $e a**lie' to micro-o$jects,
s"ch as elementary *articles#
?e 'o not agree ith these theses#
It may seem s"r*rising, $"t classical mechanics is the key to sol&ing
of all *ro$lems in *hysics, chemistry, astronomy an' $iology# The las of
this mechanics "n'erlie of a$sol"tely each nat"ral *henomenon, $"t not
eIactly in the form in hich they c"rrently eIist#
?hen e talk a$o"t $o'ies : 'ense, liH"i' or e&en gaseo"s, e think
that e&erything that ha**ens to them is &ery nat"ral# Bo'ies mo&e : $y
inertia, "n'er an infl"ence of gra&ity, or $y contin"o"s eI*os"re F*ress"reG
to them $y other $o'ies# (lso, they are 'eforme' or 'estroye'# (nyone is
free to atch it all, 'escri$e, an' eI*lore# That is hat scientists aro"n' the
orl' are 'oing#
Hoe&er, these metho's are com*letely ina**ro*riate for the st"'y of
micro-orl' : chemical elements an' elementary *articles : sta$le an'
"nsta$le# Their si3es are too small, so e canKt 'irectly o$ser&e &is"ally
them an' ho they $eha&e# Hence, all the *ro$lems an' challenges of
H"ant"m *hysics an' the *lethora of theories seeking to 'isco&er the nat"re
of the microcosm an' the las $y hich it eIists#
In this ork, the (geless ?is'om Teachers in the face of one of them
: Master Djhal !h"l : 'efen' the *osition accor'ing to hich a str"ct"re
of any $o'y e&ent"ally re'"ce' to only one elementary *articles# (ll is
constr"cte' of them# In'i&isi$le elementary *articles : are sta$le *articles#
7nsta$le *articles : are conglomerates collecte' from sta$le *articles# In
t"rn, the smallest conglomerates $"il' the $igger ones, an' so on : as long
as e see the $o'ies a**recia$le of &ie#
(n' if yo" acce*t, at least tem*orarily the claim that e&erything is
$"ilt from the sta$le elementary *articles Fso"lsG, then it o"l' $e logical to
ass"me that the las that go&ern the mechanical $eha&ior of $o'ies, are
s"ita$le an' for that from hich these $o'ies are $"ilt, that is, for *articles#
Moreo&er, yo" ha&e to reali3e that mechanics of a $o'y consists of
mechanics of each smallest com*onent in its com*osition# (n' if the
*articles o$ey to any other 5as of $eha&ior, then, of co"rse, an' the $o'ies
are o&en from the *articles o"l' $e g"i'e' $y the same 5as#
5et "s recall the ell-knon occ"lt eI*ression : JAs above, so
belowJ# Bo'ies are attracte' $eca"se the *articles ha&e the a$ility to attract
in their com*osition# (n' the re*"lsion of $o'ies takes *lace only '"e to the
fact that a certain ty*e of *articles is re*elle' in their com*osition# (n'
inertial motion of a $o'y : is the res"lt of inertia of the *articles#
?e "rge yo" not to in&ent something ne here not f"lly "n'erstoo'
an' "se' the ol' one# 5etLs take a chance to re&ie the las of classical
mechanics, gi&en the fact that the s*ace is fille' ith so"ls F*articlesG# (s
ell as letKs form"late ne las# Relying on the ol' re&ise' an' the ne
las letKs try to lay the fo"n'ations of mechanics of So"ls Felementary
*articlesG : of Ethereal Mechanics# ?e are confi'ent that the las of
classical mechanics can $e s"ccessf"lly "se' to eI*lain all the *henomena of
the microcosm# (n' e ill try to sho that in this $ook#
.40 1ARTICLES 5IN AND 5ANG0 MASS AND ANTIMASS0
1OSITI6E AND NEGATI6E CHARGES0 MATTER AND ANTI&
MATTER
1) PARTICLES YIN AN YAN!
A) Pa"ticles Yin # abso"bin$ Ethe" : form in the ethereal fiel' of the
7ni&erse Diel's of (ttraction#
Ether ten's to mo&e to s"ch *article in accor'ance ith the first
*rinci*le of the $eha&ior of Ether : JIn the ethereal fiel' &oi's 'o not
a**earJ# This mo&ing in the 'irection of the *article ethereal flo is a %iel&
o' Att"action#
E&ery *article Ain a$sor$s *er "nit of time a fiIe' amo"nt of Ether#
Beca"se an ethereal fiel' is "niform e&eryhere, has no com*ression or
s*arseness, e can talk a$o"t a s*ee' of a$sor*tion of Ether# ( s*ee' of
a$sor*tion ill j"st in'icate an amo"nt of Ether, a$sor$e' $y a *article *er
"nit of time#
() Pa"ticles Yan$ # emittin$ Ethe" : form in the ethereal fiel' of the
7ni&erse Diel's of Re*"lsion#
Ether ten's to mo&e aay from s"ch *article in accor'ance ith the
secon' *rinci*le of $eha&ior of Ether : JIn the ethereal fiel' the areas ith
eIcess 'ensity 'o not a**earJ# This ethereal flo mo&ing aay from the
*article : is a %iel& o' Re)ulsion#
Each *article emitting Ether emits *er "nit of time a fiIe' amo"nt of
Ether# Emission s*ee' in'icates the amo"nt of Ether emitte' $y *article *er
"nit of time#
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------
*) +ASS # ANTI+ASS
>o letLs 'ra a *arallel $eteen the *hysical term that eIists in
science : mass an' the conce*ts freH"ently "se' in this $ook : Diel's of
(ttraction an' Re*"lsion#
%articles ith Diel's of (ttraction FAinG are res*onsi$le for the *rocess
of gra&itation - that is, for attraction to them of other *articles# ( Diel' of
(ttraction : this is mass#
%articles ith Diel's of Re*"lsion FAangG are res*onsi$le for the
*rocess of anti-gra&itation Fstill "nrecogni3e' $y official scienceG : i#e# for
the *rocess of re*"lsion from them other *articles# In science, there is not
com*liance ith the conce*t of Re*"lsion Diel'B therefore, e ill ha&e to
create it# Th"s, a Diel' of Re*"lsion : is antimass#
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------
,) ELECTRIC C-AR!E # P.SITI/E AN NE!ATI/E
I 'o not think that only I ant to com$ine a form"la 'escri$ing the
gra&itational interaction of $o'ies Fthe Law o' $"avit0G an' the form"la
'e&ote' to the interaction of electric charges Fthe Coulomb1s lawG# So letLs
'o itO
>ee' to *"t an eH"al sign $eteen the conce*ts of mass an' )ositive
cha"$e, as ell as $eteen the conce*ts of antimass an' ne$ative cha"$e#
( *ositi&e charge For massG characteri3es the *articles Ain Fith Diel's
of (ttractionG : i#e# a$sor$ing Ether from am$ient ethereal fiel'#
( negati&e charge For antimassG characteri3es the *articles Aan Fith
Diel's of Re*"lsionG : i#e# emitting Ether into s"rro"n'ing ethereal fiel'#
In fact, mass For *ositi&e chargeG an' antimass For negati&e chargeG
*oints "s to the fact that the *article a$sor$s For emitsG Ether#
Regar'ing the *rinci*le of electro'ynamics that there is a re*"lsion of
eH"al sign charges F$oth negati&e an' *ositi&eG, an' an attraction to each
other of o**osite sign charges, it is not entirely acc"rate# (n' the reason for
this : is the not H"ite tr"e inter*retation of eI*eriments on
electromagnetism#
%articles ith the Diel's of (ttraction F*ositi&ely charge'G ne&er re*el
each other# They only attract an' are attracte'# B"t *articles ith the Diel's
of Re*"lsion Fnegati&ely charge'G, in'ee', alays re*el from each other
Fincl"'ing from the negati&e *ole of a magnetG#
%articles ith the Diel's of (ttraction F*ositi&ely charge'G attract to
themsel&es any *articles1 negati&ely charge' Fith the Diel's of Re*"lsionG
an' *ositi&ely charge' Fith the Diel's of (ttractionG# Hoe&er, if $oth
*articles ha&e Diel's of (ttraction, then those of them hose 6ra&ity Diel' is
more, increasingly shift to its other *article than it 'oes a *article ith a
smaller Diel' of (ttraction#
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------
2) +ATTER # ANTI+ATTER3
In *hysics a matter is $o'ies, as ell as chemical elements from hich
these $o'ies are $"ilt an' yet elementary *articles# In general it can $e
consi'ere' a**roIimately tr"e the "se of the term in this ay# +atte" in fact,
from the esoteric *oint of &ie, is Dorce centers, i#e# elementary *articles#
)hemical elements are $"ilt "* of elementary *articles, an' $o'ies : of
chemical elements# B"t e&ent"ally t"rns o"t that all consist of elementary
*articles# B"t to $e acc"rate, then e see aro"n' "s not the Matter, an' So"ls
: that is, elementary *articles# (n elementary *article in contrast to the &oi'
s*ace Fi#e#, in contrast of So"l to MatterG is en'oe' ith the H"ality : in it
Ether a**ears an' 'isa**ears#
The conce*t of substance can $e consi'ere' as synonym ith the "se'
$y *hysics conce*t of matter# S"$stance : is, H"ite literally, hat constit"tes
things s"rro"n'ing a *erson : that is, chemical elements an' their
com*o"n's# )hemical elements, as alrea'y mentione', consist of elementary
*articles#
Dor the s"$stance in science there are conce*ts-antonyms : anti4
substance an' antimatte", hich are synonyms to each other#
Scientists recogni3e an eIistence of antimatter# Hoe&er, hat they
take to $e anti-matter, in reality is not that# In fact, antimatter alays is on
han' of science an' as in'irectly 'isco&ere' a long time ago, since then
eI*eriments on electromagnetism are $egan to con'"ct# ( manifestation of
its eIistence e can constantly feel in the orl' aro"n' "s# (ntimatter in the
"ni&erse came together ith matter at the &ery moment hen elementary
*articles FSo"lsG a**ear# Substance : itKs *articles Ain Fi#e# *articles ith
Diel's of (ttractionG# Anti4substance : itKs *articles Aang F*articles ith
Diel's of Re*"lsionG#
%ro*erties of *articles Ain an' Aang are 'irectly o**osite, in
connection ith hich they are ell s"ite' to the role of the reH"ire' matter
an' antimatter#
.70 ETHER FILLING ELEMENTAR5 1ARTICLES IS THEIR
MO6ING FACTOR
An elementa"0 )a"ticle alwa0s ten&s to move to$ethe" with Ethe",
which cu""entl0 'ills it in the same &i"ection an& with the same s)ee&3
Ether : is a mo&ing factor of elementary *articles# If Ether that fills the
*article is motionless, an' the *article is immo$ile too# (n' if Ether, filling
the *article, is mo&ing, the *article is mo&ing too#
Th"s, $eca"se there is no essential 'ifference $eteen Ether of the
ethereal fiel' of 7ni&erse an' Ether of *articles, all %rinci*les of Ether
$eha&ior are a**lica$le to elementary *articles# If Ether, hich c"rrently
$elongs to a *article, mo&ing toar' a 'eficiency of Ether Faccor'ing to the
first *rinci*le of $eha&ior Ether : JIn ethe"eal 'iel& voi&s &o not occu"JG or
mo&es aay from an eIcess Fin accor'ance ith the secon' *rinci*le
$eha&ior Ether - JIn ethe"eal 'iel& a"eas with e5cessive &ensit0 &o not
occu"JG, the *article is mo&ing ith it in the same 'irection an' ith the
same s*ee'#
.80 WHAT IS A FORCE2 CLASSIFICATION OF FORCES
%o"ce : is one of the f"n'amental conce*ts in *hysics in general, an'
es*ecially in one of its s"$-sections : in mechanics# B"t hat is it, ho to
characteri3e it an' to s"**ort $y something eIisting in reality@
To $egin, letKs o*en any %hysical )ollegiate Dictionary an' rea' the
'efinition#
JDorce in mechanics : is a meas"re of the mechanical action on this material
$o'y of other $o'iesJ F%ED, JDorceJ, e'# (M %rokhoro&G#
(s yo" can see, Dorce in mo'ern *hysics 'oes not carry information
a$o"t something s*ecific, real# B"t at the same time the manifestations of
Dorce are more than concrete# To reme'y the sit"ation, e nee' to look on
Dorce from the *osition of the occ"ltism#
Drom the esoteric *oint of &ie a %o"ce : it is nothing like S*irit,
Ether Energy# (n' a So"l, as yo" recall, this is also S*irit, only it is Jfol'e'
like a ringJ# Th"s, $oth the free S*irit : is the Dorce an' So"l Flocke' S*iritG
: is the Dorce# This information ill greatly hel* "s in the f"t"re#
Des*ite some &ag"eness of the 'efinition of Dorce, it has H"ite real
im*lications# This is not an a$stract conce*t, as it a**ears in *hysics to'ay#
%o"ce : is the reason that com*els Ether to mo&e toar' its
'eficiency or go aay from its eIcess# ?e are intereste' in Ether enclose' in
elementary *articles FSo"lsG, so for "s a Dorce : is, first of all, the reason that
'ri&es *articles to mo&e# (ny elementary *article : is the Dorce, as it 'irectly
or in'irectly affects on other *articles#
%o"ce can be measu"e& b0 the s)ee& ith hich Ether filling the
*article Fin other or's, the *article itselfG mo&e "n'er the infl"ence of the
Dorce if on it o"l' act other forces# That is, the s)ee& o' ethe"eal 'low
coe"cin$ )a"ticles to move, this is the ma$nitu&e o' this %o"ce#
5et "s classify all ty*es of forces arising in *articles, 'e*en'ing on a
reason, hich ca"ses them#
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------
1) %.RCE .% ATTRACTI.N 6TENENCY .% ATTRACTI.N)3
The ca"se of this Dorce is any 'eficiency of Ether, a**earing
anyhere in the ethereal fiel' of the 7ni&erse#
That is, the cause o' a"isin$ in a )a"ticle a %o"ce o' Att"action is an0
othe" )a"ticle that abso"bs Ethe" # i3e3 'o"min$ a %iel& o' Att"action3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------
*) %.RCE .% REP7LSI.N 6TENENCY .% REP7LSI.N)3
The ca"se of this Dorce is any eIcess of Ether, a**earing anyhere in
the ethereal fiel' of the 7ni&erse#
That is, the cause o' a"isin$ in a )a"ticle a %o"ce o' Re)ulsion is an0
othe" )a"ticle emittin$ the Ethe" # i3e3 'o"min$ a %iel& o' Re)ulsion3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------
,) %.RCE .% INERTIA 6INERTIAL %.RCE)3
The ca"se of this Dorce is emission of all *ro'"ce' $y a *article Ether
not $y its entire s"rface, an' only the rear hemis*here Fin the 'irection of its
mo&ementG#
Inertial Dorce arises in a *article only '"e to the fact that there eIists a
Diel' of Re*"lsion - an' an Inertial Dorce can $e consi'ere' as a s*ecial case
of Re*"lsion Dorce#
The 'ifference $eteen these forces is that a Re*"lsion Dorce is a
ten'ency of a *article to mo&e aay from the eIternal for it the so"rce of
Ether, $"t an Inertial Dorce : is a ten'ency of a *article to mo&e aay from
Ether, hich emits $y itself#
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------
2) %.RCE .% PRESS7RE .% PARTICLE S7R%ACE3
(ny mo&ing *article itself is not an ethereal flo Fas o**ose' to real
ethereal streams create' $y the lack or eIcess of Ether in the ethereal fiel'G#
B"t, ne&ertheless, '"e to the fact that *articles are fille' ith Ether, an effect
of the action of a mo&ing *article on the *article along the ay, m"ch like an
action of the Diel' of Re*"lsion#
The similarity lies in the fact that in each of these cases the *article
ten's to mo&e aay from *ressing on it Ether : from Ether filling the
*article, or from Ether of Diel's of Re*"lsion# The 'ifference lies in the fact
that is, if the *article is fiIe' $y some Diel' of (ttraction Ffor eIam*le, $y
Diel' of (ttraction of a chemical elementG an' canKt freely mo&e ith
*ressing on it Ether, in the case of the action of Re*"lsion Diel' the Ether of
this Diel' *ass thro"gh it# Ether enters into the *article an' transforms it# B"t
Ether filling a *article canKt lea&e it an' enter in another *article, hich
*resses an', accor'ingly, its transformation 'oesnKt occ"r#
The most common eIam*le hen in *articles the %ress"re Dorce on
the *art of the other *article is forme' : is collision of *articles#
( *ress"re on a *article &ery often lea's to arising the Dorce of Inertia
an' the $eginning of its inertial motion#
A) A )a"ticle, )uttin$ )"essu"e on the othe" )a"ticle is '"ee 6not )a"t
o' an0 con$lome"ate )a"ticles) an& moves on thei" own # b0 ine"tia3
(ccor'ingly, at the time of collision it has a Diel' of Re*"lsion an' an
Inertial Dorce acts in it# Hoe&er, '"e to the fact that the ethereal fiel',
relati&e to hich it mo&es, offers resistance an' 'is*laces emitte' $y the
*article Ether to the $ack, the *article *ressing not ith Ether of the Diel' of
Re*"lsion, an' ith the filling it Ether#
() A )a"ticle )uttin$ )"essu"e is a )a"t o' the con$lome"ate o'
)a"ticles, such as a chemical element3
( chemical element, in t"rn, is a *art of the $o'y hich is j"st mo&ing
$y inertia#
(s a res"lt, the *articles in the elements on the s"rface of the $o'y *"t
a *ress"re#
>ot all *articles of elements of the $o'y mo&ing $y inertia form a
Re*"lsi&e Diel' at the moment of inertial motion# Therefore, the *ress"re of
the analy3e' *article may *"t as a *article ith a Diel' of Re*"lsion an' a
*article ith a Diel' of (ttraction# Hoe&er, in any case, the Ether filling the
*article *"ts the *ress"re on the st"'ying *article# E&en if it is a *article ith
a Diel' of Re*"lsion, as emitte' $y it Ether is 'is*lace' '"ring the inertial
motion $ack "n'er the *ress"re of s"rro"n'ing ethereal fiel'#
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------
So, letLs s"mmari3e an' gi&e 'efinition to all .th ty*es of Dorce#
%o"ce o' Att"action : is a reason that ca"ses a *article to mo&e in the
'irection of a**earing anyhere in the ethereal fiel' of the "ni&erse a lack of
Ether#
%o"ce o' Re)ulsion : is a reason ca"ses a *article to mo&e aay from
a**earing anyhere in the ethereal fiel' of the "ni&erse an eIcess of Ether#
%o"ce o' Ine"tia : is a ten'ency of a *article to mo&e aay from its
on Ether emitte' $y its rear Fon the 'irection of mo&ingG hemis*here#
%o"ce o' P"essu"e o' the )a"ticle su"'ace : is a ten'ency of a *article
to mo&e in the same 'irection that an' *ressing on it other *article#
.90 WH5 DO ELEMENTAR5 1ARTICLES O:E5 TO THE
ACTION OF FORCES2
5et "s ask o"rsel&es the folloing H"estion : hy Dorces are ca*a$le
to infl"ence on elementary *articles@ 4r yo" can say otherise : hy 'o
*articles o$ey to Dorces@
In the $ooks, films an' TP *rograms on *hysics e can hear or rea'
the folloing statements1 JThe force ith hich the $o'y is eI*ose' toQJ,
JThe force that as a**lie' to the $o'yQJ, etc# Ho to inter*ret the 'ee*er
meaning of these *hrases@
?e m"st start ith a remin'er that Dorce : this is a reason that ca"ses
*articles FSo"lsG to mo&e in the S*ace# Each of the fo"r eIisting ty*es of
Dorces affects on the So"ls F*articlesG : i#e# 'ri&es them : in a manner
somehat 'ifferent from the rest# The Dorce of (ttraction makes *articles to
a**roach# The Dorce of Re*"lsion an' the Dorce of %ress"re of the %article
S"rface re*el *articles# The Dorce of Inertia *"shes forar' the emitting this
Dorce Fthis EtherG *article# B"t 'es*ite this 'ifference, the reasons for hich
*articles o$ey to the Dorces, f"lly fit into the frameork of to *rinci*les of
$eha&ior of Ether, hich e 'escri$e' in the $ook /The main occ"lt las
an' conce*ts0# Beca"se *articles are nothing more than Ether# 5et "s recall
the main *oints a$o"t these to reg"larities#
To *rinci*les manage $y 'istri$"tion of Ether in the "ni&erse# Ao"
can call them J>at"re a$hors a &ac""mJ an' J >at"re a$hors a s"r*l"sJ# In
other or's :JIn the ethe"eal 'iel& voi&s &o not occu"J an' /In the ethe"eal
'iel& a"eas with e5cessive &ensit0 &o not occu"J#
(ll eIisting in the "ni&erse Ether ten's to e&enly fill e&ery *oint of
S*ace# Hence, the first *rinci*le of $eha&ior of Ether - JIn natu"e the"e is
no voi&J# The eI*ression JNatu"e abho"s a vacuumJ in this case means that,
if at any *oint of S*ace Ether 'isa**ears, am$ient ethereal fiel' JflosJ in
this 'irection, creating an ethereal flo#
Ho is it going a mo&ement of Ether in the 'irection of 'eficiency of
it@ Ether, a'jacent to the *lace here some Ether 'isa**ears r"shes there# (s
a res"lt, the *lace here it has j"st $een is release'# In its *lace, Ether
r"shes, hich coeIiste' ith it, an' is f"rther from the *lace here Ether
'isa**ears# (n' in its *lace Ether r"shes, locate' f"rther aay from the
*lace of 'eficiency of Ether# (n' so on to infinity#
(s a res"lt to the *lace of 'eficiency of Ether from the am$ient
ethereal fiel' an ethereal stream mo&es#
Th"s, S*irit FEtherG 'oes not allo the S*ace $eing em*ty, i#e# 'e&oi'
of Ether#
This *rinci*le of Ether $eha&ior is the $asis of the mechanism of
gra&ity : an attraction to each other of o$jects ranging from s"ch as
elementary *articles#
The secon' *rinci*le of $eha&ior of Ether - JIn natu"e the"e is no
e5cessJ - meaning that if at any *oint of the S*ace, there is an eIcess of
Ether, that Ether s"rro"n'ing this *oint $egins to mo&e aay from this *oint#
4therise yo" can say that arising Ether *"shes s"rro"n'ing Ether#
This *rinci*le, like the *re&io"s one, also a**lies to Ether in
elementary *articles#
This *rinci*le is the $asis of the mechanism of anti-gra&ity - that is, a
re*"lsion of o$jects#
If areas ith 'eficiency or eIcess of Ether 'i' not arise in the ethereal
fiel' of the "ni&erse, then all eIisting Ether o"l' $e a$sol"tely motionless#
B"t an eIistence of elementary *articles in S*ace is the reason that S*irit of
the "ni&erse is constantly in motion, stri&ing in any 'irection# It either ten's
to 'istance itself from a emerging near$y re'"n'ancy Fforming $y *articles
ith Diel's of Re*"lsionG, or ten's to a**roach to the fail"re occ"rring
near$y Fforming $y *articles ith Diel's of (ttractionG# (ll Ether, mo&ing to
a *artic"lar *lace here there is a 'eficiency of it, or mo&ing aay from the
*lace here there is an eIcess, forms an ethe"eal 'low# (n eIistence of
ethereal flos is a conseH"ence of the first an' secon' *rinci*les of $eha&ior
of Ether#
(ny "nit of Ether &ol"me at each moment of time is a *art of any
ethereal stream : i#e# seeks to 'istance itself from the eIcess of Ether or
a**roach to 'eficiency# Elementary *articles may *lay the role of J"nits of
the Ether &ol"meJ# Es*ecially that it is in fact - each elementary *article is a
s*here that has a certain &ol"me Fthe same for all *articlesG#
Ether, hich $elongs each moment of time the elementary *articles is
not 'ifferent from the free Ether# Therefore Ether of any elementary *article
at each moment of time incl"'e' in the com*osition of any ethereal stream -
i#e# ten's to mo&e aay from an eIcess of Ether or a**roach to a 'eficiency#
Elementary *articles ten' to mo&e together ith filling them ethereal a&es#
(ny ten'ency that arises in an elementary *article - to mo&e aay from an
eIcess of Ether or a**roach to a 'eficiency, this is the Jsubo"&ination to the
%o"ceJ#
4nly one of fo"r Dorces : Dorce of (ttraction : is $ase' on the
*rinci*le of a**roIimation to a 'eficiency of Ether# (ll other Dorces :
Re*"lsion Dorce, Dorce of %ress"re an' Dorce of Inertia : are $ase' on the
secon' *rinci*le : se*aration from the eIcess of Ether#
So e ha&e tol' a$o"t the reasons that make the *articles to o$ey# An0
elementa"0 )a"ticle is a cause o' eme"$ence o' the %o"ce 6Att"action o"
Re)ulsion # this is a )"e"equisite) in all othe" )a"ticles o' the unive"se3
An& at the same time, an0 )a"ticle is the )oint o' a))lication o' %o"ce
%iel&s o' all othe" )a"ticles o' the unive"se3 .)tional 6but not necessa"il0)
)a"ticles ma0 become a sou"ce o' %o"ce o' +ovin$ Pa"ticle o" )oint o'
thei" a))lication o' othe" )a"ticles3 An& in a movin$ )a"ticle a %o"ce o'
Ine"tia can a"ises3
.;0 FORCE AND 1RESSURE
Dorce is closely linke' ith the conce*t of )"essu"e#
Dorce is Ether, Energy# Dree Ether emitte' $y *articles, is a Dorce#
This Ether Fi#e#, this DorceG is a$le to *"t *ress"re on $o'ies, i#e# to im*act
mechanically : an' to mo&e them, 'eform an' 'estroy# (t the same time
Ether filling *articles : it is also a Dorce# That is, each elementary *article :
its s"rface : is a Dorce# (n' hen any *article mo&es an' colli'es ith other
*articles, it *"t *ress"re on them#
The first of these Dorces : free, emitte' Ether : is associate' ith
*articles Aang, since eIactly they emit Ether# %articles Aang : are %o"ces o'
Re)ulsion#
The secon' Dorce : is %o"ce o' )"essu"e o' the )a"ticle su"'ace# (ny
mo&ing *article : hether Ain or Aang : re*resents a Dorce of Mo&ement#
That is, a mo&ing *article acts as a Dorce : it can eIert *ress"re#
The thir' Dorce is %o"ce o' Att"action# %articles Ain a$sor$ing Ether
hen they are motionless ne&ertheless also are Dorces# B"t this Dorce is
s*ecial, "nlike the *re&io"s to# Beca"se that the 6ra&ity Diel' create' $y
s"ch *article 'oes not lea' to *ress"re of the *article on another F"nlike the
a$o&e to casesG# Hoe&er, the 6ra&ity Diel' of a *article Ain is the ca"se,
first, of the *ress"re on this *article $y other *articles Ain that are attracte'
to it, an' secon'ly, of the *ress"re eIerte' $y the *articles Ain each other in
their as*iration to $e attracte' to o"r *article# This latter case of *ress"re e
can o$ser&e in the orl' aro"n' "s hen e are in the hea&enly $o'y : in
the *lanet# Soli' an' liH"i' $o'ies, aiming toar's the center of Earth, *ress
on each other# Each of "s can feel this *ress"re $y its on $o'y, if, for
eIam*le, *"t on the *alm any o$ject, e&en a $ook# Elementary *articles of
chemical elements of the $ook are gra&itate' $y *articles Ain of chemical
elements of the Earth# Beca"se of this, the *articles of the $ook *"t *ress"re
on each other, an' on the *articles of the han'#
The last of the Dorces : is %o"ce o' Ine"tia# Ether emitte' $y rear
hemis*here of a mo&ing *article *resses only on the *article itself#
Th"s, *articles Ain an' Aang may either themsel&es act as Dorces
Ftheir s"rfaceG, or $ecome an in'irect ca"se of a Dorce : *articles ith Diel's
of Re*"lsion generate Dorces of Re*"lsion an' *articles ith Diel's of
(ttraction gi&e rise to Dorces of (ttraction#
?e remin' yo" once again that a %o"ce : it is nothing like Ether
FEnergyG : either free Femitte'G, or enclose' in a *article# (n' there are only
fo"r ty*es of forces : Re)ulsion, Att"action, P"essu"e o' Su"'ace o' the
)a"ticle an' Ine"tial#
(ll fo"r of these ty*es of Dorces are the ca"se of the *ress"re on
*articles : either on free, or on ones that in conglomerates of *articles#
%ress"re ca"se' $y any of three Dorces, is not 'ifferent from *ress"re of
other ty*es of Dorces# %ress"re of emitte' Ether is eIactly the same as
*ress"re of a mo&ing *article# (n' it is com*letely i'entical to *ress"re the
ca"se of hich : is a Dorce of (ttraction# That is, free Ether *resses as ell
as Ether, enclose' in an elementary *article# The only 'ifference $eteen
*ress"re of free Ether an' *ress"re of *articles - is that free Ether, eIerting
*ress"re on a *article, at the same time is a$le to *ass thro"gh it, $reak 'on
in it, an' heat it in a s"ch ay Ftransform itG# By the ay, atmos*heric
*ress"re is eIactly this ty*e of *ress"re# It is ca*a$le to heat $o'ies on the
s"rface of the *lanet, *assing thro"gh them# B"t hen a *article s"rface
*resses on a *article, Ether of the *article canKt enter into the *article, an'
conseH"ently, canKt transform FheatG it#
.<0 THE RULE OF 1ARALLELOGRAM FOR ELEMENTAR5
1ARTICLES AND FOR DIFFERENT T51ES OF FORCES

The orl' aro"n' "s is o&en from Dorces, as Dorce - is Ether an'
Ether in the "ni&erse is e&eryhere# Dorce - this is hat ten's to mo&e
something from the *lace#
4ne of the 'ifferences $eteen mechanics of $o'ies an' mechanics of sta$le
elementary *articles is that the *articles "n'er the infl"ence of forces may
only mo&e#
They can not to $e 'eforme' an' 'isintegrate for one reason - they are
inse*ara$le# ?hile a $o'y For e&en "nsta$le *article - conglomerateG, hen a
force acts on it For forcesG, may mo&e an' $e 'eforme' an' $roken 'on#
In mechanics of $o'ies Fin classical mechanicsG there is a on'erf"l
ay to hel* fin' o"t in hich 'irection the $o'y ill ten' to mo&e "n'er an
infl"ence of all forces that act on it# (lso, to calc"late the res"ltant forces#
This metho' is ell knon as the Rule o' the Pa"allelo$"am o' %o"ces#
It as o*ene' $y !alileo !alilei, an' the *recise 'efinition of this r"le
as gi&en $y Pie""e /a"inon in -E=9#
The Rule o' Pa"allelo$"am o' %o"ces says that the res"ltant force
&ector is the 'iagonal of the *arallelogram forme' $y the &ectors of to
s"mman's of forces as on the si'es#
This r"le s"r*risingly ell hel*s to calc"late *recisely the 'irection in
hich a $o'y ill mo&e For ill try to mo&eG if it is acte' "*on more than
one of the Dorce# (n' in o"r orl' e&ery $o'y is alays at the same time
eI*eriencing an im*act of the myria' of eIternal forces F$eca"se any
*article in any chemical element - is a so"rce of DorceG#
Moreo&er this R"le is *erfectly s"ite' for elementary *articles# ?ith
it, e can see the 'irection in hich an elementary *article ill shift at e&ery
moment of time if to or more Dorces act on it at the same time# (n' also
e can kno the ratio of the &al"es of Dorces - an original an' a res"ltant#
(n' the ty*e of each of the forces can $e any# The 'iagonal of %arallelogram
- this is an in'ication of 'irection, as ell as a meas"re of the res"ltant
Dorce# Hoe&er, *lease note an im*ortant factor - a ne %arallelogram of
Dorces sho"l' $e $"ilt to each neIt moment of $eing of the *article#
5etLs take a little closer look at the essence of the R"le of
%arallelogram# (n' in the co"rse of this analysis e ill gi&e it a slightly
'ifferent name : the Rule o' Subo"&ination to the ominant %o"ce# This
ill allo "s to $etter "n'erstan' the characteristics of $eha&io"r of
elementary *articles Fan' any conglomerates of *articlesG $eca"se the R"le
of %arallelogram in the form of hich it eIists no, not f"lly re&eal the
meaning of hat is ha**ening ith the *article hen more than one Dorce
affects on it# Dor eIam*le, it says nothing a$o"t the fact that there are
'ifferent ty*es of Dorces#
The Dominant Dorce : is the Dorce hich is greater in magnit"'e# (s
e sai' earlier, a magnit"'e of a Dorce - is the rate of ethereal flo
entraining the *article# Moreo&er, Ether j"st fills a *article can act as an
ethereal flo Fas in the case of the Dorce of %ress"re of the *article s"rfaceG#
The Rule o' Subo"&ination to the ominant %o"ce Fthe R"le of
%arallelogramG re*resents that the *article, on hich act more than one
Dorce, to the greatest eItent ill $e s"$ject to the higher of them# ?hat 'oes
this mean@ This means that the &ector of res"ltant forces at each moment
ill $e more $iase' toar's the &ector of Dorce ith the highest magnit"'e#
That is, the $iggest Dorce *re&ails, $"t other Dorces also ha&e an effect on
the *osition of the res"ltant force &ector# Ao" can f"rther s*ecify the name of
the r"le - Subo"&ination to the ominant %o"ce ith an acco"nting of
actions of the remaining forces#
The Dominant Dorce shifts the &ector of res"ltant Dorce in its on
'irection more than others# (n' other, smaller forces 'o not gi&e this &ector
to f"lly s"$mit to this $iggest Dorce# They *"ll the &ector in their 'irection in
*ro*ortion to their magnit"'e#
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------
In general, in the analysis of any sit"ation in hich an elementary
*article is infl"ence' $y more than one force it is necessary to consi'er a
n"m$er of factors# Dirst, 0ou nee& to 8now how man0 'o"ces actin$ on the
)a"ticle an& the value o' each o' them# Secon'ly, 0ou nee& to 8now at what
an$le the vecto"s o' %o"ces a"e )lace& one a$ainst the othe"# (n' thir',
0ou must consi&e" the t0)e each o' 'o"ces# 4nly e&al"ating all these factors,
e can try to calc"late the 'irection an' &elocity of a *article at e&ery
moment of time# 5etLs take a little closer look at these factors#
1) A value an& total quantit0 o' 'o"ces actin$ on a )a"ticle m"st $e
assesse' in each *artic"lar case#
In that case, if a n"m$er of forces acting on the *article is greater than
to, e sho"l' 'o the same as in the case of $o'ies# ?e nee' to $"il' the
*arallelogram for to forces# Then e ill make the neIt *arallelogram,
"sing the res"lting &ector an' the neIt of forces# (n' so on, "ntil it ill $e
acco"nt all of Dorces#
*) An an$le between the vecto"s o' 'o"ces actin$ on a )a"ticle is ve"0
im)o"tant in cla"i'0in$ the ma$nitu&e an& &i"ection o' the "esultant 'o"ce3
A) An an$le between vecto"s o' %o"ces is '"om 9: to ;9:3
In this case there is some kin' of s"mmation of the Dorces acting on
the *article# 4f co"rse, the res"ltant Dorce ill not $e eIactly eH"al to the
s"m of to Dorces acting on the *article# B"t in any case it ill $e more than
either of to forces, on hose &ectors e $"il' the *arallelogram# Ao" can
see this in the &al"e of the 'iagonal of a *arallelogram# (n' the shar*er an
angle is, the $igger the &al"e of the res"ltant Dorce is#
An e5t"eme case o' an acute an$le is 9:, i3e3 absence o' co"ne"# Dorce
&ectors are on one line, an' their 'irection is the same# In this case, it is
im*ossi$le to constr"ct the *arallelogram# Instea' of it - straight, e *"t on
it to segments, each of hich is eH"al to one of the o*erating Dorces# (t ,R
is the total s"mming of Dorce &ectors#
() An an$le between vecto"s o' %o"ces is mo"e than ;9:3
In this case yo" can see from the *ict"re, there is a kin' of s"$traction
Dorces# The res"ltant Dorce is alays more than the smaller of to Dorces
an' less of the $iggest one# )onfirmation of this is a &al"e of the 'iagonal#
(n' the greater an angle is, the smaller the res"ltant force is#
An e5t"eme case o' an obtuse an$le is an an$le o' 1<9:3 Dorce
&ectors are collinear# Hoe&er, "nlike an angle eH"al to ,R, the &ectors are in
o**osite 'irections# In this eItreme case, there is j"st s"$traction from the
&ector of greater force the &ector of less# The 'ifference is eIactly
corres*on's to the magnit"'e of the res"ltant force#
In an0 case, 'o" an0 value o' an an$le, the vecto" o' "esultant %o"ce
is alwa0s la"$el0 shi'te& to the la"$e" o' two %o"ces3 That is, the bi$$est
%o"ce ma8es the )a"ticle to shi't in its own &i"ection mo"e than othe"3
,) Dinally, e *resent information a$o"t how the Rule o'
Pa"allelo$"am &e)en&s on the t0)e o' %o"ces actin$ on a )a"ticle3
A) Even thou$h sou"ces o' all t0)es o' 'o"ces a"e &i''e"ent, an' their
effect on a *article can $e com*are', since each of the forces ten's to ca"se
the *articles to mo&e# (n' so, e&en if the forces acting on a *article are of
'ifferent ty*es, yo" can $"il' the %arallelogram of Dorces on the &ectors,
an' its 'iagonal ill $e shoing the 'irection in hich the *article ill
mo&e#
The &al"e of the Dorce &ector is greater, the greater a force is# ( Dorce
is greater, the greater is the &elocity ith hich the *article shifte' in this
'irection if another Dorce o"l' not act on it For other DorcesG#
The length of the &ector of res"ltant Dorce : of the 'iagonal -
corres*on's to the rate at hich a *article ill $e 'is*lace' $y the action of
to Dorces a**lie' to it#
() =e have establishe& ea"lie" that the"e a"e onl0 'ou" main t0)es o'
'o"ces3 ?hen 6alileo 'e'"ce' the R"le of %arallelogram, it is o$&io"s that
he has 'one in relation to the Dorces, ith hich some $o'ies *"t *ress"re
on others or 'rag them, making to mo&e# This ty*e of Dorce is calle' in this
$ook the Dorce of %ress"re of the %article S"rface# ?e ha&e hear' a little
a$o"t that the R"le of %arallelogram is "se' for 6ra&ity Dorce# Es*ecially,
this limit a**lies to Re*"lsi&e Dorce an' Dorce of Inertia, the first of hich
is almost not recogni3e' $y science, an' the secon' is not knon at all#
B"t anyay, this r"le is "ni&ersal an' can $e "se' for any of fo"r
ty*es of forces - %ress"re of the %article S"rface, (ttraction, Re*"lsion an'
Inertia# Hoe&er "nchange' it can $e a**lie' only to Dorce of %ress"re of
the %article S"rface, i#e# for the same e&ent, hich is 'escri$e' $y 6alileo
for $o'ies#
To $o'ies affect on the $o'y from $oth si'es - or *"t *ress"re on it
or 'rag# In o"r case, to *articles *ress on the *article Fthey canKt
mechanically 'rag the *articleG#
Taken se*arately a free *article ill ne&er ca"se long-term *ress"re on
other *article, if only the Dorce of (ttraction 'oesnKt act on it from another
*article# (lternati&ely, if *articles are incl"'e' into $o'ies an' they sH"ee3e
each other an' any *article $eteen them# Therefore, in o"r case it is one-
stage *ress"re on the *article of to *articles as a res"lt of the collision ith
it# ?hen to *articles colli'e ith a *article, it starts to mo&e $y inertia,
eIactly in accor'ance ith the R"le of %arallelogram# The 'iagonal
Fres"ltant Dorce &ectorG shos the 'irection in hich the *article ill mo&e#
Ho long inertial motion ill, 'e*en's on the rate at hich the *articles
ere mo&ing at the time of the collision ith it, on the angle $eteen the
&ectors of Dorces an' more on the H"ality of the *article itself#
C) The onl0 &i''icult0 that we 'ace in the const"uction o'
Pa"allelo$"am o' %o"ces is "elate& to Att"action an& Re)ulsion %o"ces3
Here it is s*oken e&en more likely not a$o"t the 'iffic"lty $"t a$o"t of
strangeness# So"rces of forces of attraction or re*"lsion are locate' from the
*article on one or another 'istance# Hoe&er, the *article feels effect of
these forces 'irectly# This is not s"r*rising, $eca"se a gra&itational
interaction or anti-gra&itational *ro*agates instantaneo"sly# This
instantaneo"s 'issemination is eI*laine' $y the fact that an ethereal JclothJ
: it is a kin' of monolith that fills homogeneo"sly the entire "ni&erse# (n'
the a**earance in this cloth of any eIcess or 'eficiency of Ether is
imme'iately felt at any 'istance#
In this case, hen ty*es of Dorces acting on a *article, are 'ifferent,
the &ector of Dorces m"st in'icate the 'irection in hich the Dorce stri&es to
'is*lace the *article# Dor eIam*le, if a Dorce of (ttraction acts on a *article,
so the &ector ill $e 'irecte' to an o$ject, the so"rce of this force, an' not of
it# B"t in the case of Re*"lsion Dorce all is the o**osite# The &ector ill $e
'irecte' from the so"rce of the Dorce#
(s the Dorce of %ress"re of the %article S"rface, e&erything is the
same as in mechanics of $o'ies# In this case, the so"rce of Dorce is in 'irect
contact ith the *article - colli'es ith it# (n' &ector of this Dorce is
'irecte' in the same 'irection as the motion &ector of a *article hose
s"rface eIerts *ress"re#
(n' finally, there is last of Dorces : Dorce of Inertia# The *resence of
this force can $e 'isc"sse' only in the case if a *article is mo&ing $y inertia#
If the *article is not mo&ing $y inertia, there is no Dorce of Inertia# ( &ector
of Inertia Dorce alays coinci'es ith the &ector of motion of *article at this
moment# ( &ector of Inertia Dorce is Ether emitte' $y the rear Hemis*here
of *article#
) Neve" ha))ens that two 'o"ces actin$ on a )a"ticle we"e ine"tial,
as a )a"ticle can move b0 ine"tia at each moment o' time onl0 in one
&i"ection3
E) If one or $oth of Dorces acting on a *article relate to the ty*e or of
(ttraction or Re*"lsion, the )a"ticle will move in )a"abola, gra'"ally
'is*lacing $y the action of the larger Dorce#
If one of Dorces acting on a *article refers to the ty*e of (ttraction or
Re*"lsion, an' the secon' - is Dorce of Inertia, hile the trajectory of the
*article is also *ara$olic#
%) It is neve" at the same time %o"ces o' Att"action an& Re)ulsion
act on a )a"ticle, an& thei" vecto"s woul& on the same line an& woul& be
o))osite &i"ections# The reason is that Dorce of (ttraction an' Dorce of
Re*"lsion are Dorces-anti*o'es# ( &ector of Dorce of (ttraction is 'irecte' to
the so"rce of Dorce# (n' a &ector of Re*"lsion Dorce is 'irecte' from it#
Therefore, if so"rces of (ttraction an' Re*"lsion Dorces are locate' on
o**osite si'es of a *article, the &ectors of their forces ill $e s"mme'#
If so"rces of Dorces are on one si'e of a *article, the *article ill feel
only any one of Dorces - either of (ttraction or Re*"lsion# (n' all $eca"se
the Diel's of (ttraction an' Re*"lsion screen an' affect on the &al"e of each
other#
B"t in any case, the Rule o' Pa"allelo$"am can be use& to an0
)a"ticle, to &ete"mine with its hel) a &i"ection an& ma$nitu&e o' "esultant
%o"ce3 In acco"&ance with the ma$nitu&e an& &i"ection o' the vecto" a
)a"ticle will be &is)lace& in a $iven moment o' time3
(ll that e ha&e j"st $een sai' of the R"le of %arallelogram for
*articles can $e f"lly "se' for $o'ies#
.=0 MECHANICAL 1ROCESSES AND 1HENOMENA RE6EAL
MACHANICAL 1RO1ERTIES OF ELEMENTAR5 1ARTICLES
( mechanical *rocess an' a mechanical *henomenon - are s*ecial
cases of *hysical *rocess an' *hysical *henomenon#
( )"ocess - is an e&ent, occ"rring in time#
( )henomenon can $e &iee' either as an e&ent selecte' at some
*oint of time of a *rocess, either as a generali3e' name of a *rocess#
(ccor'ingly, e "n'erstan' "n'er a mechanical )"ocess any
mechanical e&ent ha&ing time frames# ?e ill call as a mechanical
)henomenon the same mechanical *rocess, $"t in a more general form,
itho"t s*ecifying that it has any time limits#
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------
There are fo"r $asic mechanical *rocesses# They corres*on' to the
fo"r $asic mechanical *henomena, each of hich s"mmari3es the
mechanical *rocess ith the same name# In this section e talk a$o"t
mechanics of elementary *articles, so e form"late conce*ts relate' to
elementary *articles# Here are fo"r $asic mechanical *rocesses an'
*henomena1
-G (ttraction of elementary *articlesB
2G Re*"lsion of elementary *articlesB
;G Inertial motion of elementary *articlesB
.G )ollision of *articles#
+echanical )"o)e"ties o' elementa"0 )a"ticles - are their
characteristics that manifests Fare 'isclose'G in those *rocesses an'
mechanical *henomena, in hich *articles in&ol&e'#
--------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------
5etLs 'ra a *arallel $eteen the main mechanical *rocesses Fan'
*henomenaG an' mechanical *ro*erties of elementary *articles, hich in this
case are re&eale'#
1) The *henomenon of JAtt"action o' )a"ticlesJ re&eals their
folloing mechanical *ro*erty - an a$ility to a**roach ith other *articles
an' kee* them near, i#e# an abilit0 to 'o"m an& maintain a connection with
othe" )a"ticles# This mechanical *ro*erty Fi#e# this a$ilityG $elongs only to
*articles ith Diel's of (ttraction#
*) The *henomenon of JRe)ulsion o' )a"ticlesJ re&eals the folloing
mechanical *ro*erty of *articles - an a$ility to mo&e aay from other
*articles, i#e# an abilit0 to 8ee) a &istance between itsel' an& othe" )a"ticles#
In *artic"lar, the a$ility to eaken or $reak eIisting connections Fe#g#, an
increase in the total n"m$er of *articles ith Diel's of Re*"lsion in elements
linke' chemically, can lea' to r"*t"re of the connectionG#
,) The *henomenon of JInertia of *articlesJ re&eals an abilit0 o'
)a"ticles to maintain a state o' ine"tial motion# (n' as a 'isting"ishing
feat"re of *articles of 'ifferent H"ality it re&eals an abilit0 o' )a"ticles to
8ee) the initial s)ee& &u"in$ the motion#
2) The *henomenon of JCollisions o' )a"ticlesJ re&eals to
mechanical *ro*erties of elementary *articles1
a) An abilit0 o' )a"ticles to be b"ou$ht into the state o' ine"tial
motion>
b) An abilit0 o' )a"ticles to lea& othe" )a"ticles into the state o'
ine"tial motion3
/.0 THE MECHANISM OF GRA6ITATION >ATTRACTION?
The mechanism o' att"action $ases on the first *rinci*le of $eha&ior
of Ether - JIn the ethe"eal 'iel& voi&s &o not occu"J# Ether filling a *article
mo&es in the 'irection of lack of Ether, a**earing in the *lace of ethereal
fiel' here an o$ject ith a Diel' of (ttraction is locate'# It 'oes not matter
hat H"ality the gra&itating *article has - it can has as an (ttracti&e Diel'
an' a Re*"lsi&e Diel', an' a magnit"'e of these fiel's can $e any# In any
case, filling it Ether ill mo&e in the 'irection of lack : i#e# com*rising an
ethereal flo of (ttraction Diel' of the o$ject that attracts the *article#
(n ethereal flo of Diel' of (ttraction, enthralling the attracting
*article, this is the %o"ce o' Att"action#
Imme'iately e sho"l' clarify a &ery im*ortant *oint# If $oth
interacting *articles ha&e Diel's of (ttraction ith 'ifferent magnit"'es,
then an attracting *article is the one ith a $igger fiel', an' an attracte'
*article is the one ith a smaller Diel'# I#e# a )a"ticle with a smalle" %iel&
o' Att"action will a))"oach to the )a"ticle with a bi$$e" 'iel&, an& not vice
ve"sa# Ao" can call it the Rule o' Submission to the ominant %o"ce o'
!"avit0# Hoe&er, $oth *articles fell an eIistence an' action of Diel's of
(ttraction of each other : as it a Diel' of greater magnit"'e an' smaller#
B"t to feel a Diel' : it 'oesnKt mean to o$ey him# 5etKs re*eat : the *article
ith a smaller Diel' o$eys to the *article ith a $igger one mo&es toar' it#
I' both )a"ticles have %iel&s o' Att"action an& thei" value is the
same, then the0 a"e both simultaneousl0 att"actin$ an& att"acte&3 An& both
will move towa"&s each othe" 4 conve"$e3
In the event that onl0 one o' the )a"ticles has an Att"active %iel&,
an& the secon& is cha"acte"i?e& b0 the %iel& o' Re)ulsion, while onl0 a
)a"ticle Yin can be an att"actin$ one3 A Yan$ )a"ticle alwa0s is att"acte&3
?hen a *article mo&ing in 6ra&ity Diel' of other *article, an' then
comes closer, it sto*s - a connection arise $eteen the *articles# Ao" can call
it the $"avitational, i#e# '"e to the action of (ttraction Diel'# There is no
chemical, n"clear or any other kin's of connection# An0 t0)e o' this one is
$"avitational, i3e3 e5istin$ &ue to the action o' the Att"action %iel&3 (n
emergence of connection $eteen *articles e can call as a fiIing of the
*articles each to other#
Hoe&er, as eKll say in the f"t"re in an article a$o"t the
transformation $y gra&ity, attracte' *articles 'o not to"ch each other# The
ga* $eteen them remains# (n' *henomenon of transformation of the
H"ality eI*lains $y the *reser&ation of 'istance#
The *rocess of gra&itation e can com*are ith the in'ing "* of
threa'# If $oth *articles ha&e Diel's of (ttraction, then the JtanglesJ are
locate' 'irectly at $oth en's of Jthrea'J, an' they $oth in' the Jthrea'J at
the same time, each ith their on si'e# The Jthrea'J in this case - is Ether
an' the JtanglesJ : are *articles# ( tangle-*article, Jin'ingJ Ether ith a
higher s*ee' $ring closer to itself a JtangleJ in'ing Ether ith a sloer
s*ee'# ?hen the JtanglesJ com*letely reel "* free Jthrea'J among
themsel&es, they are in contact ith each other an' sto*# In this case, $oth
JtanglesJ reel "* the /threa'0, that is, $oth ha&e the Diel' of (ttraction#
B"t it may $e that only one of the JtanglesJ is in'ing a Jthrea'J,
hile another is "nin'ing it : i#e# only one of the *articles has a Diel' of
(ttraction, hile other has a Re*"lsi&e Diel'# >at"rally, tangles-*articles
ith Diel's of (ttraction can in' the threa' onto itself in'efinitely itho"t
changing their si3es, as ell as *articles ith Diel's of Re*"lsion are
infinitely ca*a$le to "nin' it off Falso not changing a si3e of the ra'i"sG# So
this is the *rocess of attraction of *articles#
Th"s, e&en after the *articles are attracte' to the contact they contin"e
to stri&e toar's each other so as Ether, filling e&ery *article at each *oint in
time contin"es to stri&e toar's an a'jacent *article, here a lack of Ether
is# )onstantly create' $y attracte' *articles ith Diel's of (ttraction an
Jethereal em*tinessJ is *recisely the ca"se of the JconnectionJ of *articles#
?hen attracting an' attracte' *articles close together an' to"ch, they
contin"e to a$sor$ Ether $eteen them at the *oint of contact# Do not forget
that the *articles a$sor$ not the Ether, hich is in contact ith the s"rface of
the *articles, an' the one in hich the s"rface is s"$merge'# %articles are the
s*heres an' the area of their contact ith each other is only one *oint# Ether
still contin"es to recei&e from the am$ient fiel' to the *article s"rfaces
contacting each other# Therefore, in the area of contact of the *articles ith
each other the lack of recei*t of Ether from the s"rro"n'ing fiel' 'oes not
arise#
//0 THE FORCE OF ATTRACTION
(s alrea'y mentione', an ethereal flo, ca"sing the *article to mo&e
along ith filling it Ether is a Dorce Fin this case, a Dorce of (ttractionG#
Dorce of (ttraction can occ"r in *articles of any H"ality# 5etLs look at
the 'etails of the mechanism of gra&ity on eIam*le of *articles of 'ifferent
H"ality# A thou$ht e5)e"iment that we a"e con&uctin$ occu"s in i&eal
con&itions # i3e3 in a totall0 em)t0 s)ace3 4ne of the interacting *articles
necessarily has a Diel' of (ttraction#
1) (oth inte"actin$ )a"ticles have %iel&s o' Att"action3
A) The value o' Att"action %iel&s o' both )a"ticles is the same3 In
this case, each of the *articles is $oth attracti&e an' attracte'# In each of the
*articles an (ttracti&e Dorce occ"rs an' it ca"ses the *article to come closer
to the secon' *article#
In this case, each of the *articles is in the com*osition of the ethereal
cloth# (n' this ethereal fa$ric is contracte' from $oth si'es, an' $oth
*articles mo&e in its com*osition# (n' each of them is s"$ject to the first
*rinci*le of $eha&ior of Ether - JIn the ethe"eal 'iel& voi&s &o not occu"J# In
accor'ance ith this *rinci*le, in each of si'es there an ethereal flo is,
'irecte' to the secon' *article# I#e# each of these *articles creates toar'
itself an ethereal flo : a Diel' of (ttraction# (n' other *article res*on's to
this ethereal flo, as it is fille' ith Ether too# Therefore it mo&es in the
com*osition of this ethereal flo in the 'irection of a secon' *article hich
is its ca"se#
The Dorce of (ttraction of each of to gra&itating *articles - is an
ethereal flo, carrying it to another, attracting it *article# The Dorce of
(ttraction of each of to attracte' *articles e can meas"re $y the s*ee'
ith hich the attracte' *article comes near to the attracting one#
?hat factors 'etermines the s*ee' of a**roaching of an attracte'
*article to attracting@
?ell, firstly, a ma$nitu&e o' the %iel& o' Att"action o' att"actin$
)a"ticle3 This is the 'i"st 'acto"3 (n ethereal flo, hich is com*ose' of
attracte' *article, a**roaches to this *article# ( magnit"'e of Diel' of
(ttraction, as e recall, is the &al"e of the rate of a$sor*tion of Ether $y the
o$ject forming this fiel'# The s*ee' ith hich Ether mo&es to the o$ject
forming this fiel' 'e*en's on the 'istance to the o$ject# The greater is a
'istance, the sloer a flo of Ether is an' the loer, res*ecti&ely, the Dorce
of (ttraction to the o$ject that arises at this *oint# Th"s, a &istance to
att"actin$ )a"ticles 4 this is the secon& 'acto" in'luencin$ a ma$nitu&e o'
%o"ce o' Att"action#
(n' finally, the thi"& 'acto" 4 is a qualit0 o' an att"acte& )a"ticle#
M"ality of *articles can $e anything# This is either an (ttracti&e Diel' or a
Re*"lsion Diel'# (n' the &al"e of the fiel' can $e any# In this case e are
talking a$o"t an attracte' *article ith a Diel' of (ttraction# So hy 'oes a
H"ality of a *article affect a magnit"'e of Dorce of (ttraction@
(ll the matter is that any *article ith a Diel' of (ttraction, a$sor$ing
Ether, there$y constantly creates aro"n' a so-calle' Jethe"eal )itJ Fethereal
&oi'G# It t"rns o"t that a *article ill fall into an Jethereal *itJ hich it
constantly creates itself on the other si'e, here the attracting *article is#
(n' a s*ee' of creation of Jethereal *itJ corres*on's to the rate of
a$sor*tion of Ether $y itself : i#e# to its &al"e of the Diel' of (ttraction#
Th"s, e no take an' slightly mo'ify the form"la of Isaac >eton,
'escri$ing the la of gra&itation# 4f co"rse, the scientist a**lies his la
only to macro-o$jects - in *artic"lar, to the hea&enly $o'ies# B"t any $o'y is
constr"cte' of chemical elements, hich in t"rn are $"ilt from elementary
*articles# (n' so gra&ity in the first t"rn is inherent to elementary *articles#
(t >eton an (ttraction Dorce eH"als the *ro'"ct of to masses 'i&i'e' $y
the sH"are of the 'istance $eteen the $o'ies1
% @ m1 A m* B " C Fcoefficient 6 left asi'e here, $eca"se e ant to
'ra yo"r attention to the $asic *hysical H"antitiesG#
(men'ments to this form"la ill $e as follos# Dirst, instea& o' the
multi)lication, we use the sum3 In or'er to kno at some *oint of time the
s*ee' at hich an in&estigate' attracte' *article comes near to an attracting
o$ject, e nee' not to m"lti*ly their Diel's of (ttraction FmassesG, namely to
s"m# ( Diel' (ttraction - is s*ee' of mo&ing of Ether to an o$ject hich
a$sor$s Ether# In or'er to kno the s*ee' of *articles is necessary to s"m the
s*ee' of ethereal flo generate' $y an attracting *article Fthe &al"e of its
Diel' of (ttraction at this *ointG, as ell as the s*ee' ith hich an attracte'
*article falls into the create' $y itself an Jethereal *itJ#
So e j"st ha&e to take mass of an attracte' *article an' to a'' to it an
(ttracti&e Diel' of an attracting *article, calc"late' at a gi&en *oint, i#e#
gi&en a 'istance# To 'o this, e 'o not take an original &al"e of the mass of
the attracting o$ject, an' the mass 'i&i'e' $y the 'istance# I#e# 'o"mula 'o"
calculatin$ %o"ce o' Att"action must have the 'o"m1
% @ 6m1 B ") D m*, here m1 B " - is the mass of an attracting o$ject,
calc"late' for a gi&en *oint, i#e# gi&en the 'istance, an' m* - is the mass of
an attracte' *article# This form"la can $e a**lie' not only in relation to one
in'i&i'"al elementary *article, $"t also to attraction of chemical elements, as
ell as $o'ies#
%ay attentionO This 'o"mula is suitable onl0 'o" those cases whe"e an
obEect itsel' has a %iel& o' Att"action # i3e3 mass3 If an attracte' *article has
antimass Fi#e# generates a Re*"lsi&e Diel'G, the form"la ill change
somehat# Ho it ill change, e ill see $elo#
(n (ttraction Diel' increases as e come near to the so"rce of this
fiel'# This means that the closer to a so"rce of gra&ity, the higher the s*ee'
of an ethereal flo is# Dor this reason, conve"$ence o' an att"acte& )a"ticle
to an att"actin$ )a"ticle occu"s at not a constant s)ee&, an& at
accele"ation# >ote, shoul& not con'use this accele"ation with an
accele"ation o' bo&ies, which is obse"ve& &u"in$ thei" '"ee 'all in the
atmos)he"e o' a celestial bo&03
In this case, Diel's of (ttraction of $oth *articles are eH"al# This
means that $oth ill come near each other ith the same acceleration#
Hoe&er, as eKll see in the folloing eIam*le, all ill $e somehat
'ifferent in the case of (ttraction Diel's of *articles are not the same# (n'
e&en the most 'ifference ill $e hen an attracte' *article has not the Diel'
of (ttraction an' the Diel' of Re*"lsion#
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
() The value o' Att"action %iel& o' one o' the )a"ticles is la"$e" than
%iel& o' Att"action o' othe" )a"ticle3
E&en 'es*ite the fact that in this case the &al"e of Diel's of (ttraction
of the *articles is 'ifferent, the mechanism of their attraction to each other in
many res*ects similar to that 'escri$e' a$o&e# In this case, only one of the
*articles is an attracte' to each other - the one that has greater (ttraction
Diel' &al"e Fattracts Ether ith a higher s*ee'G# It is this *article $ecomes a
ca"se of Dorce of (ttraction in the secon' *article - ith less Diel' of
(ttraction# The magnit"'e of this Dorce of (ttraction can $e fo"n' from the
form"la that e 'eri&e' in the *re&io"s eIam*le1 % @ 6m1 B ") D m*, here
m1 B " - is the mass of an attracting o$ject, calc"late' for a gi&en *oint, i#e#
gi&en the 'istance an' m* - is the mass of an attracte' *article# Here m1 - is
the mass of the *article ith a larger Diel' of (ttraction an' m* : is the mass
of a *article ith the Diel' of lesser magnit"'e#
*) An att"acte& )a"ticle has %iel& o' Re)ulsion3
In this case, a Dorce of (ttraction also occ"rs in only one *article - one
that has a Diel' of Re*"lsion# The *article ith a Diel' of (ttraction calls the
Dorce#
In this case, the attracte' *article is also mo&ing toar's the attracting
*article com*rising an ethereal flo, hich it creates# Hoe&er, an attracte'
*article ith a Diel' of Re*"lsion constantly emits in all 'irections Ether -
incl"'ing in the 'irection of an attracting *article# Th"s, this *article is
constantly increasing a n"m$er of Ether, that shares it an' the gra&itating
*article : i#e# constantly forms a kin' of Jethe"eal cushionJ that *re&ents a
con&ergence of the *article ith attracting one or j"st slos it#
( Re*"lsion Diel' - is also an ethereal flo, $"t not coming ear to the
*article, an' mo&ing aay from it# (n' all the *articles that fall into a 3one
of action of this ethereal flo also mo&e ith it an' mo&e aay from the
so"rce of this Re*"lsion Diel'# I#e# $eca"se an attracte' *article *ossess $y a
Diel' of Re*"lsion, it ca"ses a res*onse Dorce in attracting *article - a %o"ce
o' Re)ulsion#
%articles ill a**roach still closer or there ill $e their 'istancing or
the 'istance $eteen them remains constant, it 'e*en's of the Diel's of
(ttraction of an attracting *article at a gi&en 'istance an' of the Diel' of
Re*"lsion of an attracte' *article# If $oth fiel's at a gi&en *oint are eH"al in
magnit"'e, the 'istance $eteen the *articles ill remain "nchange'# If the
magnit"'e of the Diel' of (ttraction at a gi&en *oint of (ttraction is more in
mo'"l"s, the *articles ill a**roach closer# (n' if more the &al"e of
Re*"lsion Diel' of a *article, the 'istance $eteen the *articles ill
increase#
(n' here is the *romise' form"la for calc"lating an initial Dorce of
(ttraction of a *article, hich itself has a Diel' of Re*"lsion#
% @ 6m1 B ") 4 am*, here m1 B " - is the mass of an attracting o$ject,
calc"late' for a gi&en *oint, i#e# gi&en the 'istance an' am* - is the antimass
of an attracte' *article# >ote here e make no s"mming of the Diel's of
(ttraction an' Re*"lsion, an' their s"$traction# S"$traction e *ro'"ce for
the reason that a Re*"lsi&e Diel' of an attracte' *article re'"ces the s*ee' at
hich in each moment of time this *article ten's to mo&e in the 'irection of
the attracting *article#
5et "s ill"strate the a$o&e form"la $y means of small com*"ting#
(ss"me the mass of an attracte' *article eH"als < ar$itrary "nits# The
antimass of an attracte' *article is ; stan'ar' "nits, an' the 'istance $eteen
the *articles is 2 stan'ar' "nits# Then, accor'ing to the form"la a *rimary
Dorce of (ttraction in the attracting *article is1 % @ 6;B*) 4 , @ 13F#
Since the %o"ce o' Att"action he"e has the GDG si$n, the att"acte&
)a"ticle with the %iel& o' Re)ulsion will a))"oach close" with the
att"actin$ )a"ticle3
There is another eIam*le# The mass of an attracting *article eH"als E
stan'ar' "nits# The antimass of an attracte' *article is ; stan'ar' "nits, an'
the 'istance $eteen the *articles is 2 stan'ar' "nits# Then, accor'ing to the
form"la a *rimary Dorce of (ttraction in the attracte' *article is1 % @ 6HB*) 4
, @ 9#
Since the %o"ce o' Att"action in this case is ?e"o, the"e will no be an
a))"oachin$ o' the )a"ticles o" &istancin$ them#
There is a thir' eIam*le# The mass of an attracte' *article eH"als .
stan'ar' "nits# The antimass of an attracte' *article is ; stan'ar' "nits# The
'istance $eteen the *articles is 2 stan'ar' "nits# Then, accor'ing to the
form"la a *rimary Dorce of (ttraction in the attracte' *article is1 % @ 62B*) 4
, @ 41#
In this case, the Dorce of (ttraction has a J-J sign# This means that
the )a"ticles will &"i't a)a"t '"om each othe"3
/30 THE TRUTH A:OUT FORCE OF ATTRACTION
5etLs re&isit again all &al"es in the form"la % @ !m1 I m* B "C, hich
'escri$es the 5a of 6ra&itation, form"late' $y Isaac >eton#
1) An elementa"0 )a"ticle is the main )a"tici)ant o' $"avit03
Isaac >eton 'e'"ce' the 5a of 7ni&ersal 6ra&itation, $ase' on
o$ser&ations of motion of celestial $o'ies#
He lai' great gro"n'ork in or'er to f"lly "n'erstan' hat a
*henomenon of attraction is# He lai' a fo"n'ation, $"t this is not eno"gh#
>eton talke' a$o"t attraction of o$jects of macrocosm an' has not s*rea'
this *henomenon to microcosm# This is "n'erstan'a$le# (fter all, at his life,
h"manity has not yet o*ene' a microcosm - not chemical elements, not
elementary *articles#
The task of mo'ern *hysics is *recisely to gras* $y its las all that is
in the "ni&erse, in *artic"lar, to eIten' the *henomenon of attraction
Fgra&itationG to o$jects of microcosm# (s long as this is not 'one, there ill
$e se*arate from each other $"avitational inte"action, st"on$ inte"action
an& ma$netism#
4nce *hysics ill make an elementary *article as the main *arty of
the 5a of "ni&ersal gra&itation, this *ro$lem ill 'isa**ear $y itself, an'
all three of these interactions in the min's of scientists merge into one#
(n' hile carriers of gra&itational interaction are only celestial $o'ies
: i#e# itKs a >etonLs legacy# B"t celestial $o'ies are not $"ilt of chemical
elements an' chemical elements are not $"ilt of elementary *articles@
Hoe&er, mo'ern science is still afrai' to let go of the fatherly han'
of >eton an' mo&e on its on# >ee', e nee' to 'o itO >ecessary to
transform an elementary *article of a J*assi&e o$ser&erJ of the *rocess of
gra&itation of celestial $o'ies into the sole ca"se of this *rocess#
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
*) You &o not consi&e" accele"ation o' $"avit0 as a cause o'
&e)en&in$ o' 'o"ce o' att"action on the &istance3
I' an0one believes that inc"easin$ o' s)ee& o' a 'allin$ soli& o"
liqui& bo&0 as sho"tenin$ the &istance between it an& the cente" o' the
)lanet can be seen as evi&ence that %o"ce o' Att"action inc"eases with
&ec"easin$ a &istance between obEects, it is a w"on$ conclusion3
The "eason 'o" accele"ation o' the bo&0 &u"in$ its '"ee 'all 4 not
"e&ucin$ the &istance to the cente" o' the )lanet, an& ine"tia o' the 'allin$
bo&0J ?e consi'er in 'etail the reasons for acceleration of freely falling
$o'ies in the $ook /+echanics o' bo&ies0#
There is a *roof of o"r arg"ments# ( $o'y can achie&e the same s*ee'
at 'ifferent heights of fall# It 'e*en's on the magnit"'e of *ath tra&ele' $y it
in the atmos*here# The longer it is, the greater the s*ee' is# ( $o'y may
reach a certain &elocity an' near the s"rface an' somehere at high altit"'e#
(s yo" can see, this fact contra'icts the concl"sions of mo'ern *hysics# It
claims that at a certain height the rate of fall m"st ha&e a certain &al"e,
hich m"st $e a constant# So it follos from >etonKs la of gra&ity# B"t in
*ractice it is not# )onseH"ently, it is not Dorce of 6ra&ity is the reason for
the groth of &elocity of the $o'y '"ring its free fall#
The tr"e ca"se of acceleration : is inertia of $o'y motion, i#e# self-
s"staining mo&ement# ItKs an im*"lse#
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------
,) The &istance between $"avitationall0 inte"actin$ bo&ies3
Does the 'istance $eteen gra&itationally interacting o$jects affect the
magnit"'e of Dorce of (ttraction@
The anser : /yes0# Distance to the o$ject ith Diel' of (ttraction
affects the &al"e of Dorce of (ttraction, ca"se' $y this o$ject in the st"'ie'
*article#
(s alrea'y mentione', a *article is a s*here an' if mo&ing aay from
it, the &ol"me of s*ace s"rro"n'ing the *article ill increase concentrically#
(ccor'ingly, the farther aay from the *article, the $igger is an amo"nt of
Ether s"rro"n'ing the *article# Each *article ith Dorce of (ttraction
a$sor$s Ether from the am$ient ethereal fiel' at a certain s*ee'# The s*ee'
of a$sor*tion of Ether $y the *article - this is originally inherent to this
*article a &al"e of the Diel' of (ttraction# Hoe&er, the farther aay from a
*article, the greater is an amo"nt of Ether ill s"rro"n' it# (ccor'ingly, the
farther aay from a *article, the smaller ill $e the rate at hich Ether is
closer to a gi&en *article Fi#e#, the smaller the s*ee' of an ethereal floG - i#e#
the smaller is the &al"e of the Diel' of (ttraction# Th"s, e say, first, a$o"t
the &al"e of the Diel' of (ttraction originally inherent to this *article, an'
secon', a$o"t the &al"e of the Diel' of (ttraction at a certain 'istance from
the *article#
(ccor'ingly, the farther aay an in&estigate' *article is from the
*article ith the Diel' of (ttraction, ca"sing in it the Dorce of 6ra&ity, the
less is the &al"e of this Dorce#
Dor eIam*le, letKs consi'er s"ch a case# Some *article interacts ith
to *articles forming Diel's of (ttraction# Hoe&er, the 6ra&ity Diel' of
one of these *articles is greater than the Diel' of (ttraction of the secon'
*article# >e&ertheless, all "ltimately 'etermine the 'istance at hich these
*articles ill $e sit"ate' from the in&estigate' *article# (n' it may ha**en
that a *article ith a larger Diel' of (ttraction ca"ses a smaller Dorce of
(ttraction - if it ill $e m"ch farther than a *article ith smaller Diel' of
(ttraction#
/40 MASS IS FIELD OF ATTRACTION@ WEIGHT " IS FORCE
OF ATTRACTION

( little earlier, e ha&e alrea'y *"t an eH"al sign $eteen the
conce*ts of mass an' %iel& o' Att"action# >o letLs fin' o"t hat is wei$ht#
Referring to the Encyclo*e'ic Dictionary - hat is 'efinition of
eight gi&en there@
J?eight is a force ith hich a $o'y acts on a reliance For hangerG, it
*re&ents free fallJ FSo&iet Encyclo*e'ic Dictionary, e'# %rokhoro&G#
J?eight is a n"merical &al"e of the Dorce of 6ra&ity acting on a $o'y
locate' near the earthLs s"rfaceJ F%hysical Encyclo*e'ic Dictionary, e'#
%rokhoro&G#
In this case, the conce*t eI*o"n'e' in this $ook, is consonant ith the
theory of mo'ern *hysics# =ei$ht - is Dorce of (ttraction F6ra&ityG#
In encyclo*e'ic 'ictionaries no$o'y says a$o"t eight of elementary
*articles, this term e&ery$o'y refers only to $o'ies# Hoe&er, $o'ies are
constr"cte' of chemical elements, hich, in its t"rn, consist of elementary
*articles# Therefore, $efore e talk a$o"t eight FDorce of (ttractionG of
$o'ies, e sho"l' a**ly this conce*t to elementary *articles#
( so"rce of Diel' of (ttraction is a *article ith Diel' of (ttraction or
a chemical element, hich f"lly or *artially manifests o"tar'ly the Total
Diel' of (ttraction, or a $o'y of "s"al si3es, containing elements ith Diel's
of (ttraction, or a celestial $o'y# If e take at ran'om any elementary
*article, then any of these so"rces ill ca"se in it the corres*on'ing Dorce of
6ra&ity# (ny of these Dorces re*resents j"st the eight of *article ith
res*ect to the so"rce of the Diel' of (ttraction, ca"sing this Dorce#
/70 THE MECHANISM OF ANTIGRA6ITATION
>RE1ULSION?
%articles ith Diel's of (ttraction are the ca"se of Dorces of (ttraction
in the s"rro"n'ing *articles# (n' hat is a$o"t the *articles forming in the
ethereal fiel' Diel's of Re*"lsion@ They 'o not ca"se the Dorce of
(ttraction# >o, any *article ith the Diel' of Re*"lsion is the ca"se of the
Dorce of Re*"lsion in s"rro"n'ing *articles#
%o"ce o' Re)ulsion, arising in any *article - is an ethereal flo,
ca"sing Ether of the *article to mo&e aay from eIcess of Ether arising in
the ethereal fiel'# EIcess of Ether is alays forme' $y the *article ith the
Diel' of Re*"lsion#
In the section of *hysics 'e'icate' to electromagnetism Dorces of
Re*"lsion eIist on a *ar ith Dorces of (ttraction# Hoe&er, in
electromagnetism not the $o'ies an' charge' *articles are attracte' an'
re*elle', i#e# there is no relationshi* ith gra&itation# B"t if anti-gra&itation
Fre*"lsionG o"l' ha&e $een recogni3e' $y scientists, an' not j"st
recogni3e', an' as the anti*o'e of gra&itation ill $ecome, e&erything
o"l' fall into *lace# Elect"oma$netism woul& a))ea" in the min&s o'
scientists not mo"e than the $"avitational4anti$"avitational inte"action3
%ositi&e an' negati&e charges o"l' $e con&erte' into mass an' antimass#
ThatLs all# This o"l' $e the first ste* in the 'irection of G!"an&
7ni'icationG o' 'ou" inte"actions#
In reality, the so"rce of Re*"lsion Diel' F*article, chemical element or
cl"ster of chemical elementsG can $e shiel'e' $y free *articles or chemical
elements Fsoli's, fl"i'sG# Diel's of (ttraction an' Diel's of Re*"lsion of the
shiel'ing o$jects change the magnit"'e of the Re*"lsion Dorce in the
in&estigate' o$ject#
Shiel'ing *articles ith Diel's of Re*"lsion themsel&es are the ca"ses
of Re*"lsion Dorces# (n' these Dorces of Re*"lsion e sho"l' a'' to the
Dorce of Re*"lsion of the o$ject, infl"ence of hich e eIamine#
Shiel'ing *articles ith Diel's of (ttraction are the ca"ses of Dorces
of (ttraction# These Dorces of (ttraction e m"st s"$tract from the Dorces
of Re*"lsion, hich e eI*lore#
>o there are fe or's a$o"t the feat"res of re*"lsion of the
*articles ith 'ifferent &al"es of Diel's of Re*"lsion#
If $oth interacting *articles ha&e Diel's of Re*"lsion ith 'ifferent
&al"es, then a re*"lsi&e *article is the *article ith the larger Diel', an' a
re*elle' one is the *article ith the smaller Diel'# I#e# the )a"ticle with the
smalle" %iel& o' Re)ulsion will move awa0 '"om the )a"ticle with the
la"$e" %iel&, an& not vice ve"sa# 5et "s call it the Rule o' Submission to the
ominant %o"ce o' Re)ulsion3
I' both )a"ticles have %iel&s o' Re)ulsion an& thei" values a"e the
same, then the0 both will be simultaneousl0 "e)elle& an& "e)ulsive3 An&
both a"e est"an$e& '"om one anothe" with the same s)ee&3
In that case, i' onl0 one o' the )a"ticles has %iel& o' Re)ulsion, the
secon& is cha"acte"i?e& b0 the %iel& o' Att"action, an& then the "e)ulsive
one is the )a"ticle Yan$3 Yin is alwa0s Eust "e)elle&3
(s yo" can see, all is $y analogy ith the Dorce of (ttraction, j"st the
o**osite#
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The mechanism of anti-gra&itation Fre*"lsionG is com*letely o**osite
to the mechanism of gra&itation FattractionG#
4ne of to *articles in&ol&e' in the interaction of antigra&ity, m"st
necessarily ha&e a Re*"lsi&e Diel'# 4therise, e can not kee* talking
a$o"t antigra&ity interaction#
?e com*are' the *rocess of gra&itation ith the in'ing "* of a
JtangleJ# If to 'ra an analogy ith the mechanism of gra&itation, then the
*rocess of re*"lsion - is the "nin'ing of the JtangleJ# ( *article ith a
Diel' of Re*"lsion is a JtangleJ# Emission $y it of Ether is "nin'ing of
Jthrea'J FEtherG# ( *article ith a Diel' of Re*"lsion "nin'ing the Jthrea'J
Femitting EtherG increases the 'istance $eteen it an' s"rro"n'ing *articles,
i#e# re*els, an' alienates them from itself# Ether in *articles ith the Diel's
of Re*"lsion 'oes not 'ry o"t# %articles 'o not sto* to emit it#
4f to *articles in&ol&e' in the anti-gra&itational *rocess, one that
has a Diel' of Re*"lsion is re*"lsi&e# ( secon' *article, res*ecti&ely, is
re*elle'# ( *article of any H"ality can $e re*elle' - as ith the Diel' of
Re*"lsion an' ith the Diel' of (ttraction# In that case, if $oth *articles
ha&e Diel's of Re*"lsion, each of them is *lay a role as re*"lsi&e an'
re*elle'#
( re*"lsion mechanism $ase' on the secon' *rinci*le of $eha&io"r of
Ether - JIn the ethe"eal 'iel& a"eas with e5cessive &ensit0 &onKt occu"J#
Ether, filling a *article, an' ith it the *article itself mo&ing aay from
eIcess of Ether arising in that *lace of ethereal fiel' here an o$ject ith a
Diel' of Re*"lsion is locate'#
/80 THE FORCE OF RE1ULSION
(n ethereal flo, ca"sing Ether of the re*elle' *article mo&e aay
from eIcess of Ether, i#e# from the o$ject ith Diel' of Re*"lsion e call as
the J%o"ce o' Re)ulsion0#
>at"rally, in contrast to the *rocess of gra&ity a connection $eteen
re*elling *articles 'oes not form# There can $e no H"estion a$o"t connection
$eteen the *articles# S"**ose to *articles are gra&itationally $o"n'# B"t
as a res"lt of transformation one of them or $oth at once change' the
6ra&itational Diel' on the Re*"lsi&e Diel'# The mechanism of
antigra&itation comes into action imme'iately, an' the *articles re*el each
other, i#e# a connection is $roken off#
Magnit"'e of Re*"lsion Dorce 'e*en's on the same three factors as
magnit"'e of the Dorce of (ttraction1
-G Magnit"'e of Re*"lsion Diel' of the *article Fthe chemical element
or $o'yG ser&ing the ca"se of Re*"lsion DorceB
2G The 'istance $eteen a so"rce of Re*"lsion Diel' an' an
in&estigate' *articleB
;G ( H"ality of re*elle' *article#
5etLs consi'er an effect of all these factors#
1) +a$nitu&e o' Re)ulsion %iel& o' an obEect is the cause o'
Re)ulsion %o"ce3
Magnit"'e of Re*"lsion Diel' of the *article - is the s*ee' of
a$sor*tion of Ether $y its s"rface# (ccor'ingly, the hi$he" is the s)ee& o'
abso")tion o' Ethe", the $"eate" is ma$nitu&e o' Re)ulsive %o"ce cause&
b0 this )a"ticle in an investi$ate& )a"ticle#
*) The &istance between the sou"ce o' Re)ulsion %iel& an& an
investi$ate& )a"ticle3
EI*lanation of 'e*en'ence of magnit"'e of Re*"lsion Dorce on the
'istance similar to the 'escri*tion the reason for hich the Dorce of
(ttraction 'e*en's on the 'istance#
(n elementary *article is a s*here, an' if to mo&e aay from it, an
amo"nt of s*ace s"rro"n'ing the *article ill gro concentrically#
(ccor'ingly, the farther aay from the *article, the greater is the &ol"me of
Ether, s"rro"n'ing the *article# Each *article ith the Diel' of Re*"lsion
emits Ether into s"rro"n'ing ethereal fiel' at a certain rate# The "ate o'
emission o' Ethe" b0 the )a"ticle 4 that is o"i$inall0 inhe"ent to this
)a"ticle the value o' Re)ulsion %iel&3 Hoe&er, the farther aay from the
*article, the greater an amo"nt of Ether ill s"rro"n' it# (ccor'ingly, the
'a"the" awa0 '"om the )a"ticle, the smalle" will be the "ate at which Ethe"
is movin$ awa0 '"om a $iven )a"ticle Fi#e#, the smaller the &elocity of an
ethereal flo isG - i#e# the smalle" is the value o' Re)ulsion %iel&# Th"s, e
say, first, a$o"t an originally inherent to the *article magnit"'e of Re*"lsion
Diel', an' secon', a$o"t the magnit"'e of Re*"lsion Diel' at a certain
'istance from the *article#
The 'u"the" an investi$ate& )a"ticle is '"om the )a"ticle with the
%iel& Re)ulsion, that causin$ in it a Re)ulsive %o"ce, the smalle" is the
ma$nitu&e o' this %o"ce3
,) The qualit0 o' "e)ulsive )a"ticles3
4f co"rse, the H"ality can $e any# This may $e as a *article ith the
Diel' of (ttraction an' ith the Diel' of Re*"lsion#
(n' the &al"e of the Diel' can $e any# If e are talking a$o"t re*elle'
*article ith the Diel' of Re*"lsion, then hy 'oes on the &al"e of
Re*"lsion Dorce of the *articles affects the H"ality of its on@ (ll the matter
is that any *article ith the Diel' of Re*"lsion emitting Ether, there$y
constantly creates aro"n' a so-calle' Jethe" )illowJ# It t"rns o"t that a
*article ill $e a''itionally re*elle' $y the Jethereal *illoJ, hich it
constantly creates from the other si'e, here the re*elling *article is
sit"ate'# (n' the rate of creation $y the *article of the Jethereal *illoJ
corres*on's to the rate of emission of Ether $y itself, i#e# of its &al"e of
Re*"lsion Diel'#
In mo'ern *hysics, there is no the Law o' 7nive"sal Re)ulsion
similar to the 5a of 7ni&ersal (ttraction, o*ene' $y >eton# (n' in &ain#
?e 'o not "n'erstan' hy s"ch la has not $een form"late' still, $eca"se
its manifestations are not less e&i'ent than the 'emonstration of the 5a of
6ra&itation# Take at least the knon fact, as the rise of heate' air "*#
If there is no the la, there is no form"la that 'escri$es the interaction
of o$jects, at least one of hich is the ca"se of Re*"lsion Dorce# B"t e ill
correct this mis"n'erstan'ing#
By analogy ith the form"la for the 5a of 6ra&itation, $"t not of
Isaac >eton, an' ith that 'eri&e' $y "s in the article a$o"t gra&itation, e
ill make the folloing form"la for the 5a of (ntigra&itation1
% @ 6am1B ") D am* here am1B " : itKs antimass of a re*elling o$ject
com*"te' for a gi&en *oint, i#e# gi&en the 'istance an' am* : itKs antimass of
the re*elle' *article#
(s yo" can see, in this case e also "se not a m"lti*lication of
antimasses an' their a''ition# In or'er to kno at some *oint in time the rate
at hich in&estigate' re*elle' *article mo&es aay from its re*"lsi&e o$ject,
e nee' not to m"lti*ly their Re*"lsion Diel's FantimassesG, an' namely to
s"m# Re*"lsion Diel' : is a rate of emitting of Ether $y the o$ject# In or'er
to kno the &elocity of the *articles it is necessary to s"m the rate of
ethereal flo generate' $y the re*"lsi&e *article, i#e# the &al"e of its
Re*"lsion Diel' at a gi&en *oint, as ell as the &elocity ith hich the
re*elle' *article is re*elle' $y the create' it on Jethereal *illoJ#
?e take the antimass of the re*"lsi&e *article an' a'' to it the
Re*"lsi&e Diel' of the re*"lsi&e *article, calc"late' at the gi&en *oint, i#e#
gi&en the 'istance# To 'o this, e take no initial &al"e of antimass of the
re*"lsi&e o$ject an' the antimass, 'i&i'e' $y the 'istance#
This form"la is only s"ita$le for those occasions hen the re*elle'
o$ject itself has the Diel' of Re*"lsion, i#e# antimass# If re*elle' *article is
characteri3e' $y mass Fi#e#, generates an (ttracti&e Diel'G, the form"la ill
change somehat# ?e ill gi&e the form"la $elo#
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5etLs look at 'etails of the mechanism of anti-gra&itation on the
eIam*le of *articles of 'ifferent H"ality#
A thou$ht e5)e"iment con&ucte& b0 us will occu" in i&eal con&itions
# i3e3 in the totall0 em)t0 s)ace3 4ne of interacting *articles necessarily has
the Diel' of Re*"lsion#
1) (oth inte"actin$ )a"ticles have Re)ulsion %iel&s3
A) The value o' Re)ulsion %iel&s o' both )a"ticles equals3
In this case, each of the *articles is $oth re*"lsi&e an' re*elle'# (
Dorce of Re*"lsion ca"se' $y the action of the secon' re*"lsion fiel' of
interacting *articles ca"se' $y the action of the Re*"lsion Diel' of the
secon' of interacting *articles arises in e&ery *article#
5et to *articles initially are se*arate' $y some 'istance# Beca"se
eH"ality of Diel's of Re*"lsion $oth *articles 'rift a*art at a constant s*ee'#
The s*ee' of 'istancing is constant $eca"se the constant is the rate of
emission of Ether in the *articles#
() The value o' Re)ulsion %iel& o' one o' the )a"ticles is $"eate"
then Re)ulsion %iel& o' anothe" )a"ticle3
E&en tho"gh in this case the &al"e of Diel's of Re*"lsion &aries, the
mechanism of their re*"lsion from each other is similar to the a$o&e# 4nly
in one of the *articles a Dorce of Re*"lsion arises - in the re*elle' one, i#e# in
that here the Diel' of Re*"lsion is less# ( re*"lsi&e *article is one in hich
a Re*"lsi&e Diel' is more# It generates a Re*"lsi&e Dorce#
( re*elle' *article ill mo&e aay from the re*"lsi&e one ith eH"al
'eceleration# Deceleration is relate' to a concentric increase of the &ol"me
of the s*ace ith 'istance from the *article emitting Ether# Distancing s*ee'
of the *article at each time *oint is *ro*ortional to the &al"e of a**earing in
it the Re*"lsion Dorce# The more is the Re*"lsi&e Dorce occ"rring in the
*article, the greater is the s*ee' of alienation of the *article at the gi&en
moment#
*) An att"acte& )a"ticle has %iel& o' Re)ulsion3
In this case, the Re*"lsion Dorce arises only in one *article - one that
has a Diel' of (ttraction# ( *article ith Diel' of Re*"lsion ca"ses this
Dorce#
Since the re*elle' *article has a Diel' of (ttraction, it ca"ses in a
re*"lsi&e *article a res*onse Dorce - the Dorce of (ttraction#
There ill $e 'istancing or a**roach of the *articles, or the 'istance
$eteen them remains constant, in'e*en'ent of the &al"e of Re*"lsion
Dorce in the re*elle' *article an' (ttracti&e Dorces in re*elling one# If to
forces are eH"al in magnit"'e, the 'istance $eteen *articles ill remain
"nchange'# If the &al"e of Re*"lsion Dorce is more in mo'"l"s, the *articles
ill $e 'istancing# (n' if the &al"e of the Dorce of (ttraction is more, then
the 'istance $eteen the *articles ill $e re'"ce'#
(n' here is the form"la for calc"lating the initial Re*"lsion Dorce in a
re*elle' *article, hich itself has a Diel' of (ttraction#
% @ 6 AmB") 4 m, here amB" is antimass of the re*elling o$ject
com*"te' for the gi&en *oint, i#e# gi&en the 'istance an' m - is the mass of
re*elle' *article# >ote here e make no a''ition of the Diel's of Re*"lsion
an' (ttraction, an' their s"$traction# S"$traction is for the reason that the
Diel' of (ttraction of re*elle' *article re'"ces the rate at hich in each time
*oint the *article ten's to mo&e aay from the re*"lsi&e *article# (s yo" can
see, the *rocess is a mirror o**osite of hat e ha&e 'escri$e' for the
attraction of *article ith the Diel' of Re*"lsion#
/90 WH5 HA6E ATIGRA6ITATION STILL NOT
RECOGNIAED :5 SCIENCE2
)hemical elements of the mineral king'om consist of elementary
*articles only of the %hysical %lan# The *lants also incl"'e *articles of the
(stral %lan# (n' in the $o'ies of animals there are e&en the *articles of the
Mental %lan# In the three %lans - *hysical, astral an' mental - the n"m$er of
*articles Ain Fith the Diel's of (ttractionG *re&ails o&er the n"m$er of
*articles Aang Fith the Diel's of Re*"lsionG# So at the $ottom of the
atmos*heric ocean, on a soli' s"rface of the *lanet here e li&e, the
*ercentage of *articles Ain is more# Moreo&er, of all the elements of the
*lanet, of the soli' an' liH"i' *ortions of its s"rface the force of attraction
acts on all#
Th"s, in the orl' aro"n' "s the *re'ominant *art of chemical
elements relates to the mineral king'om# )onseH"ently, mostly e are
s"rro"n'e' $y elementary *articles of the %hysical %lan# They are
characteri3e' $y a significant *re'ominance of Dorce of (ttraction o&er the
Re*"lsion Dorce# So for "s, it is easy to o$ser&e in the s"rro"n'ing $o'ies
mainly the manifestations of the gra&ity# Something 'ro**e' on the gro"n' -
thatLs yo" an' the manifestation of the 5a of 6ra&itation#
To o$ser&e the manifestations of the Re*"lsi&e Dorces itKs a little more
com*licate'# It is for this reason the Re*"lsion Dorce : or otherise
antigra&itation : $y science is still not recogni3e'# (ltho"gh there are &ery
m"ch of nat"ral *henomena an' *rocesses eI*laine' $y the 5a of
Re*"lsion#
In the *hysics literat"re in the sections of electromagnetism the
Re*"lsion Dorces are mentione' along ith the Dorces of (ttraction# B"t as
still as gra&itation an' electromagnetism scientists 'i'nKt link to each other
ell, then the eIistence of an anti*o'e for gra&itation, like the
electromagnetic Re*"lsi&e Dorce, 'i' not is recogni3e'# (s a res"lt, since the
time of Isaac >etonLs in classical *hysics there is only the 5a of
7ni&ersal 6ra&itation#
If a Re*"lsion Dorce 'oes not a**ear in nat"re along ith a Dorce of
(ttraction, it o"l' not ha&e $een *ossi$le s"ch *henomena as the
'isintegration of chemical com*o"n's an' change of the *hysical state of
matter toar's a more rarefie'# If there is not a Re*"lsi&e Dorce, o"r $o'ies
as flattene' into a *ancake on a soli' s"rface of the *lanet# (n' the Earth
itself o"l' $e a tiny s"*er'ense celestial $o'y#
S"ch *hysical *rocess, as an eItension of the $o'ies '"ring their
heating in'irectly *oints to eIistence in >at"re of Re*"lsi&e Dorces# 4r s"ch
as rising "* of heate' air#
/;0 FIELD OF ATTRACTION REDUCES FIELD OF
RE1ULSION@ FIELD OF RE1ULTION REDUCES FIELD OF
ATTRACTION
5etLs look at hat ha**ens to the &al"e of the Dorces of (ttraction an'
Re*"lsion, if their so"rces are locate' near$y on the same line#
So"rces of Dorces of (ttraction - it is alays *articles ith the Diel's
of (ttraction# (n' so"rces of Dorces of Re*"lsion - it is alays *articles
ith the Diel's of Re*"lsion#
If an eI*eriment as con'"cte' in a com*letely em*ty s*ace an'
there ere only to *articles : a *article ith the Diel' of (ttraction or the
Diel' of Re*"lsion Fa so"rce of the DorceG an' an in&estigate' *article in
hich this Dorce occ"rs hen really nothing co"l' affect the magnit"'e of
this Dorce#
B"t in reality, the s*ace is not em*ty an' fille' ith elementary
*articles of &arying H"ality#
So, if on the segment se*arating $y an in&estigate' *article from the
*article-so"rce of the Dorce F(ttraction or Re*"lsionG, other *articles are
locate' also - ith the Diel's of (ttraction or Re*"lsion For an' those, an'
othersG, the folloing ill occ"rs#
%articles ha&e an a$ility to shiel' each other# The shiel'ing effect
'e*en's on the H"ality of shiel'ing *articles, as ell as the H"ality of the
shiel'e' *article#
If a shiel'e' *article generates an (ttracti&e Diel', as ell as all
*articles screening it, hich are locate' on the segment $eteen it an' the
in&estigate' *article, *ossess Diel's of (ttraction, there is s"mming of the
&al"es of the Diel's of (ttraction of all *articles# (n', accor'ingly, there is a
s"mmation of all Dorces of (ttraction that all *articles on the segment ca"se
in the in&estigate' *article#
EIactly the same s"mmation occ"rs if shiel'e' *article generates a
Re*"lsi&e Diel', as ell as all *articles on the segment screening it ha&e
Re*"lsion Diel's# Res*ecti&ely, Re*"lsi&e Dorces ca"se' $y all these
*articles in the st"'y *articles, are s"mmari3e' too#
B"t thatKs hat ha**ens if the original Dorce acting on the *article is
the Dorce of (ttraction, an' on the segment there are not only the *articles
ith the Diel's of (ttraction, $"t also the *articles ith Re*"lsion Diel's# 4r
e ha&e an eItreme case, an' all shiel'ing *articles ha&e the Diel's of
Re*"lsion, an' only shiel'e' *article has an (ttracti&e Diel'# In this case,
the Diel's of Re*"lsion of all *articles are s"mmari3e' an' in one ay or
another screen the (ttraction Diel'# Beca"se of this (ttracti&e Dorce acting
on the in&estigate' *article is re'"ce' an' may e&en 'isa**ears altogether,
re*lacing the Re*"lsion Dorce#
The same thing ha**ens in the case if the original force acting on the
in&estigate' *article is the Dorce of Re*"lsion, on the segment there are not
the *articles only ith the Diel's of Re*"lsion, $"t the *articles ith the
Diel's of (ttraction# In this case also there is a s"mmation of $oth ty*es of
Diel's, an' the total Diel' of (ttraction also in one ay or another shiel's
the total Diel' of Re*"lsion# Beca"se of this the Dorce of Re*"lsion acting
on the in&estigate' *article is re'"ce' an' may e&en 'isa**ears altogether,
re*lacing the Dorce of (ttraction#
To assess the H"ality an' &al"e of the Dorce arising in the in&estigate'
*article is not eno"gh to calc"late the total Diel' of (ttraction an' Diel' of
Re*"lsion an' after that to s"$tract the smaller from the larger# >o, yo"
sho"l' consi'er the H"ality of all the *articles on the segment, an' the
magnit"'e of their Diel's#
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5etLs s"mmari3e an' ith the fairly sim*le lang"age eI*lain once
again hy the *articles ith Re*"lsion Diel's re'"ce the Dorce of (ttraction,
an' the *articles ith the Diel's of (ttraction re'"ce the Dorce of Re*"lsion#
%articles ith Diel's of (ttraction a$sor$ Ether emitte' $y
neigh$oring *articles ith Diel's of Re*"lsion# Beca"se of this, the rate of
ethereal flo of Re*"lsion Diel' 'ecreases, an' th"s the Ten'ency of the
in&estigate' *article to mo&e aay from eIcess of Ether 'ecreases, i#e# the
Dorce of Re*"lsion 'ecreases#
%articles ith Diel's of Re*"lsion emitting Ether toar' the
neigh$oring *articles ith Diel's (ttraction, there$y com*ensate Fto some
eItentG create' $y them a lack of Ether# Beca"se of this, the rate of ethereal
flo of the Diel' of (ttraction 'ecreases an' ith it the Ten'ency of the
in&estigate' *article to a**roach to the lack of Ether, i#e# the Dorce of
(ttraction 'ecreases#
)omment to the *ict"re#
( *article ith Diel' of Re*"lsion if it is a'jacent to the *article ith
the Diel' of (ttraction, $eca"se it emits Ether, affects the o"tar'
manifestation of this Diel' of (ttraction# Emitte' Ether : is an Jethereal
*illoJ, shiel'ing the (ttraction Diel'# Re*"lsion Diel' creates in the
ethereal fiel' re'"n'ancy of Ether an' th"s to some eItent ne"trali3e a lack
forme' $y the Diel' of (ttraction#
(t the same time, the *article ith the Diel' of (ttraction, neigh$oring
to the *article ith the Diel' of Re*"lsion a$sor$ing emitte' Ether, there$y
affects on o"tar' manifestation of this Diel' of Re*"lsion#
A Fie) of
A$$%ac$ion
An 'e$he%ea *iow+ " an eBce##
of E$he% " )ec%ea#e# $he
(anife#$a$ion of $he Fie) of
A$$%ac$ion of $he neighCo%ing
*a%$ice
A *a%$ice
wi$h a Fie) of
A$$%ac$ion
A *a%$ice wi$h
a Fie) of
Re*!#ion
Do not $e s"r*rise' that eLre talking a$o"t it here, $eca"se this is a
&ery im*ortant to*ic#
Dor eIam*le, in any conglomeration of elementary *articles, s"ch as a
chemical element, there are $oth ty*es of *articles - Ain an' Aang# They are
miIe', some shiel' others# B"t in the en', hen e ill look at the element
o"tsi'e, e can not kno eIactly hat *articles are there, since the total
Dorce Diel' manifests itself o"tar'ly, is the res"lt of a''ition an'
s"$traction of m"lti*le Diel's of (ttraction an' Re*"lsion# B"t the &ery fact
that e kno a$o"t hat is ha**ening insi'e, hel* "s to a&oi' mistakes#
In any celestial $o'y chemical elements of 'ifferent H"ality are miIe'#
Dor eIam*le, in the atmos*here those are 'ominate' hose Diel' of
Re*"lsion is totally 'ominates in the Dorce Diel'# (n' in the center of the
*lanet there are $asically the elements hich Diel's of (ttraction 'ominate,
an' large H"antities are# (tmos*heric chemical elements shiel' the elements
of the central regions# (s a res"lt, hen e are increasingly mo&ing aay
from the *lanet, its Diel' of (ttraction is getting smaller $y re'"cing its total
o"tar' manifestation $y the total Diel' of Re*"lsion of atmos*here# (n' at
a certain 'istance the *lanetLs Diel' of (ttraction 'oes not feel at all - the
e''ect o' wei$htlessness eI*erience' $y astrona"ts#
A *a%$ice wi$h a
Fie) of A$$%ac$ion
aC#o%C# E$he%
e(i$$e) C, $he
*a%$ice wi$h a Fie)
of Re*!#ion
A *a%$ice wi$h
a Fie) of
A$$%ac$ion
A *a%$ice $ha$ i# oca$e)
Cehin) $he *a%$ice wi$h
$he Fie) of A$$%ac$ion
ge$# e## E$he% e(i$$e)
C, $he *a%$ice wi$h $he
Fie) of Re*!#ion
/<0 TRANSFORMATION OF THE DUALIT5 IS THE
TEM1ERATURE RISE
T"ans'o"mation o' the qualit0 - is the tem*erat"re increase of an
elementary *article#
(n (ct of Transformation of the M"ality Fa Raising of !"n'aliniG - is
an ama3ing la, the manifestations of hich e can o$ser&e constantly
aro"n' "s as a $asis for many nat"ral *henomena#
5etLs look at its essence#
(s alrea'y mentione', any *article is a s*here, in the center *oint of
hich there is create' Ether, an' on the *eri*hery - it is 'estroye'# ( s*here
itself has the a$ility to hol' Ether in its $or'ers# (n' the H"antity of Ether
that fills the s*here of the *article in the gi&en moment is only its#
=heneve" an e5cessive amount o' e5te"nal Ethe" ente"s in a )a"ticle
)e" unit o' time, T"ans'o"mation o' the e5te"nal mani'estation o' its
qualit0 occu"s3
This is the or'ing of the 5a of Transformation of eIternal
manifestation of M"ality# >ote, in the 5a of Transformation e s*eak not
a$o"t changing of the H"ality of *article, namely the changing of the
eIternal manifestation of the H"ality# The sheer H"ality of the *article
remains "nchange' : i#e# the s*ee' of creation an' 'estr"ction of Ether 'oes
not change# B"t the feat"res of the Dorce Diel' of the *article Fthe Diel's of
(ttraction or Re*"lsionG "n'ergo changes#
Dor $re&ity instea' of Jtransformation of the eIternal manifestation of
H"alityJ e sim*ly ill say - T"ans'o"mation o' the Lualit0 o' the )a"ticle#
Ho, 'oes enrolling in a *article of Je5cessiveJ Ether change Fmake to
e&ol&eG eIternal manifestation of its H"ality@
?hat is meant $y JeIcessi&e EtherJ@
E5cessive Ethe" - is Ether, hich in "s"al, nat"ral con'itions m"st not
enter into the *article# This Ether is Ja$o&e the normJ# %article Jhas not or'er
itJ, $"t has recei&e' this JgiftJ# (n' eIternal Ether *assing thro"gh the
*article "n*lanne' is for it JeIcessi&eJ#
Transformation of the H"ality can occ"r in *articles of any H"ality :
an' ith Diel's of (ttraction an' ith Diel's of Re*"lsion, an' for any &al"e
of these fiel's#
5etKs take, for eIam*le, a *article ith a Diel' of (ttraction# In "s"al
con'itions, eIactly as Ether on all si'es from the s"rro"n'ing ethereal fiel'
goes to s"ch *article, as it nee's to 'estroy# If the *article falls into an
ethereal flo, create' $y the o$ject ith the Diel' of (ttraction or Re*"lsion
or arising '"e to the motion of the *article relati&e the ethereal fiel', this
ethereal flo ca"ses an increase in the rate of entering into it of eIternal
Ether# EIcessi&e Ether entering into the *article eIerts *ress"re on Ether
filling the *article an' *re&ents that on create' in the *article Ether is
'estroye' in it# Ether, $orn into a central *oint, can not mo&e toar' the
front hemis*here, here eIcessi&e Ether enters# (s a res"lt, all $orn Ether
mo&es to the rear hemis*here of the *article#
In the rear hemis*here e&erything is going accor'ing to *lan# There is
'estroye' that *ortion of $orn Ether, hich m"st $e 'estroye'# Since this is a
*article ith a Diel' of (ttraction, it lacks of on Ether an' in it a''itionally
Ether from the o"tsi'e comes, creating a Diel' of (ttraction# B"t in the case
of transformation that *art of $orn Ether that has not 'estroye' in the front
hemis*here is 'estroye' in the rear one#
(ll on Ether ill $e 'estroye' or not, 'e*en's on the s*ee' ith
hich Ether is 'estroye' in the *article an' the s*ee' of creation# It may
ha**en that Ether enters into the *article ith ins"fficient s*ee' an' in the
front hemis*here still some *art of the $orn Ether is 'estroye'# Therefore, it
comes into the rear hemis*here less# (s a res"lt, the rear hemis*here nothing
ill emit an' e&en nee' to contin"e to com*ensate for a 'eficiency of Ether
from o"tsi'e Faltho"gh at a sloer rateG, creating a Diel' of (ttraction# I#e#
transformation can only re'"ce the &al"e of the Diel' of (ttraction in the rear
hemis*here, $"t not remo&e it com*letely an' re*lace $y the Diel' of
Re*"lsion#
If Ether entere' into the *article at a rate eIcee'ing the rate of
'estr"ction of Ether in it, then in the *article there a**ears re'"n'ant
a''itional, eIternal Ether# In the rear hemis*here there is 'estroye' only as
Ether, as reH"ire'# The rest ill come o"t form the *article as a Re*"lsion
Diel'#
(s yo" can see, the $asis for the emerging of a *article in the rear
hemis*here a Re*"lsion Diel' is an amo"nt of $orn Ether, that not colla*se'
or in the front or in the rear hemis*here, an' an amo"nt of eIternal Ether
that entere' into the front s"rface of the *article, $"t also as not 'estroye'
F*ro&e' $eyon' meas"reG# (ll this Ether comes o"t of the *article in the
form of Re*"lsion Diel'# The &al"e of arising Diel' of Re*"lsion Fthe rate of
an ethereal floG 'e*en's on the rate of entry into the *article of eIternal
Ether, an' also on the H"ality of the *article# The greater the &elocity of the
eIternal ethereal flo is, the greater the &elocity of creation is an' the lesser
the rate of 'estr"ction, the greater the likelihoo' that the 6ra&ity Diel' of the
*article in the rear hemis*here not only ill $e re'"ce', $"t ill 'isa**ear at
all, re*lacing $y the Diel' of Re*"lsion F$y emitte' EtherG#
.ccu""ence o' the %iel& o' Att"action o" eme"$ence o' the %iel& o'
Re)ulsion at the )a"ticle 4 thou$h not on the whole su"'ace, but onl0 in the
"ea" hemis)he"e 4 this is the t"ans'o"mation 6evolution) o' the e5te"nal
mani'estation o' the qualit0 o' the )a"ticle3
(n' no letKs s*eak a$o"t the transformation of the H"ality of a
*article ha&ing o"tsi'e this *rocess the Diel' of Re*"lsion# 7nlike the
*article ith the Diel' of (ttraction s"ch *article at all 'oes not a$sor$ Ether
from am$ient ethereal fiel'# Instea', it is a so"rce of Ether, i#e# it emits#
Des*ite this 'ifference, the mechanism of hat is ha**ening ith the
*article is com*letely analogo"s to hat e ha&e 'escri$e' for *articles Ain#
?hene&er a *article falls into an ethereal flo, create' $y the o$ject ith the
Diel' of (ttraction or Re*"lsion or $y motion relati&e to ethereal fiel', this
eIternal Ether *"ts *ress"re on its front hemis*here Ffront : relati&e to the
ethereal floG# This means that Ether, mo&ing from the center of the *article
to its *eri*hery 'oes not get an o**ort"nity to $e emitte', as ell as *art of it
ill not $e 'estroye' in the Sone of Destr"ction of the front hemis*here#
Instea', there ill $e 'estroye' the eIternal Ether, that entere' into the
*article in front of it# (n' then, only as m"ch as it is necessary in accor'ance
ith the rate of 'estr"ction# Th"s, all Ether that as $orn, as ell as an
amo"nt of eIternal one that came in, $"t not as 'estroye', is mo&ing to the
rear hemis*here# (n' in the rear hemis*here e&erything is as it sho"l' $e :
there is 'estroye' the *art of Ether $eca"se it as $orn in the central area#
Therefore, any eIcessi&e Ether from the front hemis*here is j"st emitting# (s
a res"lt, the &al"e of the Diel' of Re*"lsion Frate of emission of EtherG in the
rear increases# So the 5a of Transformation of eIternal manifestation of the
H"ality manifests ith res*ect to the *articles ith the Diel' of Re*"lsion#
The &al"e on hich the Diel' of Re*"lsion of the *article increases
'e*en's on three factors1 on the s*ee' ith hich eIternal Ether entere'
into the *article, on the rate of 'estr"ction of Ether in it an' on the rate of its
creation#
?e can H"antify assess the &al"e of transformation of the *articles,
regar'less of hether they ha&e Diel's of (ttraction or Re*"lsion "sing the
J'egree of transformation of the H"alityJ#
The &e$"ee o' t"ans'o"mation of the eIternal manifestations of the
H"ality e sho"l' "n'erstan' as the 'ifference $eteen the rate of emission
of Ether after transformation an' the rate of emission $efore# (ccor'ingly,
for the *articles Ain to the res"lting 'ifference e m"st a'' the &al"e of their
Diel' of (ttraction, i#e# the rate of a$sor*tion of Ether#
5etLs list Jthe wa0s o' $ettin$J of transformation of the H"ality or in
other or's the con'itions "n'er hich the *ress"re of eIternal Ether
changes the o"tar' manifestation of H"ality of the *article#
1) T"ans'o"mation o' qualit0 occu"s in an0 )a"ticle movin$ "elative
to the su""oun&in$ ethe"eal 'iel&3 The *ress"re of eIternal Ether in this case
is ca"se' $y *ress"re on Ether of the mo&ing *article $y itself# The res"ltant
effect of this is similar to as if Ether himself mo&es toar' the *article#
Transformation 'oes not occ"r hen am$ient ethereal fiel' mo&es in the
same 'irection an' at the same s*ee', i#e# hen mo&ing somehere Ether
carries a *article#
This Jay of transforming H"alityJ - transformation of the H"ality
'"ring the mo&ement - is the $asis of s"ch *henomenon as inertia#
*) T"ans'o"mation b0 Ethe" o' the %iel& o' Att"action
6t"ans'o"mation b0 $"avitation)M
,) T"ans'o"mation b0 Ethe" o' the %iel& o' Re)ulsion
6t"ans'o"mation b0 anti$"avitation)3
a) (t the collision of *articlesB
b) (n in&estigate' *article an' the *article ith the Diel' of Re*"lsion
forcing it to $e transforme' are at rest as *art of conglomerate of *articles,
for eIam*le, of s"ch as a chemical element#
Transformation from the *oint of &ie of the occ"ltist, it is nothing
like JRise o' Nun&aliniJ or else JI$nition o' Li$htsJ# ?hy this *rocess 'o
e call the /Rise of !"n'alini0@
!"n'alini is knon to $e a JDiery ser*ent $iting its on tailJ, S*irit
rotating in the *article '"ring time# !"n'alini is the So"l, a *article# ?hen
e talk a$o"t JRiseJ - this means that the eIternal H"ality of the *article
clim$s the e&ol"tionary stair# The $irth of the S*irit an' its emission is an
e&ol"tion# ?hereas its 'estr"ction an' a$sor*tion is in&ol"tion# It t"rns o"t
that hen the Diel' of Re*"lsion occ"rs or increases in the *article, it
e&ol&es#
(ll that j"st sai' is s"ita$le for an eI*lanation of hy e "se the
eI*ression JIgnition of 5ightsJ# Dire - is synonymo"s ith the S*irit# (ny
*article is a JrotatingJ Dire# Ignition of 5ights - this is the eIact synonym of
scientific eI*ression Jrise in tem*erat"reJ# The fire is $"rning, i#e# *article
tem*erat"re rises - its tem*erament an' H"ality change#
8"st a$o"t this 5a : the 5a of Transformation : (lice Bailey trie'
to tell "s in the JTreatise on the Se&en RaysJ, hen she sai' that the
minerals *ass the Initiation $y Dire an' *ress"re# Initiation $y Dire an'
*ress"re - this is j"st one of the ays of the transformation of elementary
*articles - transformation $y emitte' Ether : $y the Diel' of Re*"lsion#
(nother synonym for the term JtransformationJ is t"ansmutation#
Something on this to*ic yo" can fin' at the en' of the &ol"me JEsoteric
(strologyJ# %erha*s in the neIt $ooks e eI*lain information *resente' $y
(# Bailey#
/=0 TRANSFORMATION OF THE DUALIT5 OF THE
1ARTICLE IN THE 1ROCESS OF ITS INERTIAL MOTION
?hene&er a *article "n'er the action of a *"sh $y other *article
$egins to mo&e relati&e to the ethereal fiel' of the 7ni&erse, Ether, thro"gh
hich it mo&es, enters into it, an' the o"tar' manifestation of its H"ality is
transforme' Fchange'G# The res"ltant effect of this is similar to as if Ether
himself mo&es toar' the *article, an' enters into it# It 'oes not matter hat
is the H"ality of a *article, i#e# ith hich s*ee' Ether is create' an'
'estroye'# Ether of am$ient ethereal fiel' enters into the Sone of Destr"ction
of the front hemis*here of the *article an' is 'estroye' there instea' of Ether
hich is generate' in the *article# Sim"ltaneo"sly "n'er *ress"re of Ether of
ethereal fiel', Ether $orn into the *article is *"she' into the rear hemis*here
an' emits there# (n' yet, if the &elocity of the *article relati&e to the ethereal
fiel' eIcee's the rate of 'estr"ction, eIternal Ether occ"rs in the *article,
an' it also ill $e emitte' ith Ether, that as $orn in the *article an' not
'estroye' in the front hemis*here#
(s a res"lt, if itKs a *article ith a Diel' of (ttraction, then in its rear
hemis*here Frelati&e to the 'irection of motionG the Diel' of (ttraction either
'ecreases or it 'isa**ears at all an' instea' it the Diel' of Re*"lsion a**ears
FEther emitsG# (n' if it is a *article ith a Diel' of Re*"lsion, in its rear
hemis*here its &al"e increases#
S"ch ay there is manifeste' transformation FchangeG of eIternal
manifestation of the H"ality of the *article# Transformation - is one of to
conseH"ences of any 'is*lacement of the *articles relati&e to ethereal fiel'#
The secon' conseH"ence is an inertial motion of *article#
The 'egree of transformation of the H"ality 'e*en's on three factors1
-G an initial &elocity of the *article, i#e# the s*ee' ith hich the *article has
$een set in motionB 2G a &elocity of 'estr"ction of Ether in the *articleB ;G a
rate of creation of Ether#
The greater there is an initial &elocity of the *article, the faster Ether
ill enter into the *article, the more eIcessi&e Ether enters into the *article
in a "nit of time, an' the greater there ill $e the 'egree of transformation#
3.0 TRANSFORMATION OF DUALIT5 :5 GRA6ITATION
>GRA6ITATIONAL FIELD?0 THE CAUSE OF MASS DEFECT@
RADIOACTI6IT5 AND RADIATION OF THE STARS
>o e *rocee' to consi'er the transformation in'"ce' $y the Diel'
of (ttraction#
This Jtransformation metho'J, as the *re&io"s one, connecte' ith the
entering into the *article of eIcessi&e amo"nt of Ether#
(s yo" alrea'y kno the *articles ha&ing Diel's of (ttraction are
Jres*onsi$leJ for the *rocess of gra&ity# (n' they can $e attracte' $y the
*articles of any H"ality# Transformation of the H"ality $y Ether of the Diel'
of (ttraction occ"rs in *articles ith any eIternal manifestation of H"ality -
as ith the Diel' of (ttraction an' ith Re*"lsion Diel'# In that case, if $oth
*articles in&ol&e' in the *rocess of attraction ha&e Diel's of (ttraction, each
of them ill $e $oth the ca"se of transformation an' eI*eriencing it#
S"rro"n'ing "s ith yo"r orl' is the 5ogoic %lan, here *articles of
'ifferent *lans are interconnecte' an' hence of the 'ifferent H"ality# The
5ogoic %lan is fille' ith all sorts of conglomerates of elementary *articles#
(mong them, the most common ty*e of conglomerate is a chemical element#
Besi'es these, there are "nsta$le *articles, each of hich is a mini-
conglomerate# So, the transformation of *articles $y gra&itation is $est
o$ser&e' on the eIam*le of the chemical elements# B"t $efore t"rning to a
conglomerate, letKs fin' o"t the ca"se of transforming infl"ence of gra&ity on
the eIam*le of to *articles#
(t first letKs remin' o"rsel&es the mechanism of gra&itational $on'
$eteen *articles# 5et to *articles ith (ttraction Diel's interact ith each
other : i#e# /are connecte'J ith their Diel's of (ttraction# The Sone of
Destr"ction of each *article is immerse' in the ethereal fiel' an' a$sor$s
Ether from it# 5et "s recall that an elementary *article is fille' ith Ether,
hich is some kin' of Jri**leJ on a Jsmooth s"rfaceJ of S*ace# (lso e
recall that $eteen Ether filling *article an' Ether of the s*ace is no
'ifference an' no $o"n'aries# (n' so Ether of ethereal fiel' is a$le to freely
*enetrate the *article an' *ass there thro"gh#
Each of these to attracting *articles Ain feels an action of the Diel'
of (ttraction of other neigh$oring *article# Each of these *articles creates in
the ethereal fiel' of the "ni&erse 'eficiency of Ether# (n' as in this eIam*le,
there are only to *articles, then for each of them lack Ether *ro'"ce' $y
the neigh$oring *article is a single# (n' in the 'irection of this single
'eficiency of Ether creating $y the neigh$oring *article, Ether of each of
to *articles ten's to mo&e, an' hence the hole elementary *article#
(ttentionO >o the most im*ortant in eI*laining of the mechanism of
transformation $y gra&itation $egins#
Aong a ine *a##ing
$h%o!gh $he cen$e%# of $he
*a%$ice#@ $hei% Fie)# of
A$$%ac$ion a%e #!((e)
The %a$e of en$e%ing
of E$he% in$o $hi#
*a%$ice i#
*%o*o%$iona $o
$he #!( of $he
Fie)# of A$$%ac$ion
of Co$h *a%$ice#0
:o$h *a%$ice# a%e $%an#fo%(e)
5etLs call one of the *articles as transforming, an' the other as
transforme'# ( transforming *article necessarily m"st ha&e a Diel' of
(ttraction F$eca"se here e are talking a$o"t the transformation $y
attractionG# Hoe&er, in this eIam*le, each of the *articles is sim"ltaneo"sly
an' transforming an' transforme'#
(long the line connecting the centers of $oth *articles their Diel's of
(ttraction are s"mmari3e'# This means that for the s"rro"n'ing ethereal
fiel', these to *articles are no single J'eficiencyJ of Ether F$"t only
along the line *assing thro"gh the centers of $oth *articlesG# ( transforming
*article, locate' $ehin' a transforme' thro"gh the a''ition of its on Diel'
of (ttraction increases the rate of entering of Ether in the front *article -
from its eIternal si'e# I#e#, hether a *article is single, Ether o"l' enter
into it at a rate corres*on'ing to the &al"e only of its Diel' of (ttraction# (n'
thatLs all# (n' there is no any eIcessi&e Ether# B"t in this case, to *articles
are co"*le' together# (n' an attracting *article J$ehin'J of attracte' like
JorksJ for itself : i#e#, the front *article JfeelsJ a generate' 'eficiency of
Ether# B"t in the en' it t"rns o"t that Jthe fr"its of its la$orJ rea*ing the front
*article Ftransforme'G : the s*ee' of entering into it Ether increases in
*ro*ortion to the magnit"'e of the Diel' of (ttraction of rear *article, that is
transforming one# Th"s, eIactly a transforming *article is a ca"se of
transformation of the *article in front of it# B"t as in o"r case, each *article
has a Diel' of (ttraction $oth are transforme', each ith its on si'e#
Transformation of the eIternal manifestation of H"ality in attracte'
*article Fas alays in the transformationG is re'"ce' either to a re'"ction in
the rear hemis*here of the Diel' of (ttraction Fthis is for the *articles AinG,
or to its 'isa**earance an' re*lacement $y a Diel' of Re*"lsion Falso for the
*articles AinG, or to an increase of the Diel's of Re*"lsion Ffor the *articles
AangG# ?hat ill $e the 'egree of transformation 'e*en's "*on the &elocity
of the ethereal flo, that enters into the transforme' *article Fi#e#, "*on the
magnit"'e of the total Diel' of (ttractionG an' "*on the ratio of the rate of
'estr"ction an' creation of Ether in the transforme' *article#
Transformation $y gra&ity is no 'ifferent from the *re&io"s Jmetho'J
- transformation $y mo&ement# Decrease in *articles Ain from their inner
si'e of their Diel's of (ttraction or a**earance of the Diel's of Re*"lsion, as
ell as an increase in *articles Aang the Re*"lsion Diel's : this is, in the
lang"age of science, nothing else, as a re'"ction of the eight, mass# I#e#
re'"ction that makes the *article ten's to attracting it *article or to the
conglomerate of *articles# In the gra&itating *articles as they a**roach the
Dorce of (ttraction 'ecreases#
4cc"rrence or increase of the Re*"lsion Diel' in the *articles on the
insi'e si'e makes them gro a*art to some 'istance# I#e# e can make a &ery
im*ortant concl"sion - between $"avitatin$ )a"ticles with a la"$e
ma$nitu&e o' actin$ on them %iel& o' Att"action an inte"val a))ea"s3 I3e3 a
sta0in$ in )a"t o' a la"$e con$lome"ate causes )a"ticles to move awa0
'"om each othe" an& '"om the common cente"3 An& the"e is close" to the
cente", the mo"e the )a"ticles ten& to move awa0 '"om this cente"3 This
conclusion is ve"0 use'ul 'o" us to un&e"stan& what is $oin$ on in the
bowels o' an0 chemical element, as well as in the bowels o' an0 celestial
bo&03
If the Diel' of Re*"lsion 'oes not occ"r, $"t sim*ly the Diel' of
(ttraction is re'"ce', then it is the eakening of the $on'#
Hoe&er, in this *rocess of 'istancing or eakening of the $on' there
are some limitations, o*erating accor'ing to the metho' of fee'$ack# The
more gra&itating o$jects are mo&ing aay from each other For the $on'
eaken $eteen themG, the less there ill $e the &al"e of (ttraction Diel' of
each of them in relation to each other F'istance effectG# (n' accor'ingly, the
smaller there is the 'egree of transformation# The smaller the 'egree of
transformation is, the smaller are the Diel's of (ttraction or Re*"lsion
arising For increasingG in these o$jects# (n' then less they mo&e aay For
eaken the $on' ith each otherG# In reality, of co"rse, there is not the
*rocess of Jmane"&eringJ of the *articles# They imme'iately in the *rocess
of formation of a conglomerate set a certain 'istance ith res*ect to each
other an' the center# This 'istance is 'etermine' $y the magnit"'e of the
total Diel' of (ttraction acting on each *article, an' the H"ality of this
*article Fthe ratio of &elocity of creation an' 'estr"ction of EtherG#
E5actl0 t"ans'o"mation b0 $"avitation lies at the hea"t o' this well4
8nown in nuclea" )h0sics e''ect as Gmass &e'ectG3 (esi&es the
t"ans'o"mation b0 $"avitation is the cause o' the )henomenon o'
"a&ioactivit03 An& besi&es, e5actl0 this Gmetho&G o' t"ans'o"mation ma8es
celestial bo&ies 6sta"s, Nuclei o' !ala5ies, Nuclei o' Su)e" $ala5ies) emit
elementa"0 )a"ticles3
The more *articles ith the Diel' of (ttraction are locate' $ehin'
transforme' *article, the greater is the total Diel' of (ttraction, an' the
greater is the s*ee' of entry of Ether into the front *article an' the higher is
the 'egree of transformation# Hoe&er, not only the *article Jon the e'geJ
eI*eriences the transformation# If on the line connecting the centers there
are not to $"t se&eral, each of them JeI*eriencesJ the increase' s*ee' an'
*ress"re of the Ether an' each ill $e transforme'#
5etLs analy3e on hat factors 'e*en's the &al"e of the 'egree of
transformation of the *article# It is ca"se', firstly, the magnit"'e of the total
Diel' of (ttraction, hich is com*ose' of all the Diel's of (ttraction of all
*articles, JorkingJ on the in&estigate' *article# (n', secon'ly, it 'e*en's
on the H"ality of the transforme' *article#
Diel' of (ttraction - this is an ethereal c"rrent, mo&ing toar's the
*article a$sor$ing Ether# The greater is the 'istance to the *article, the less is
ten'ency to mo&e in the 'irection of gi&en *article ith the Diel' of
(ttraction an' the sloer is a motion of Ether# I#e# an initial magnit"'e of the
Diel' of (ttraction of the *article 'ecreases ith increasing of 'istance to it#
Therefore, the magnit"'e of each Diel' of (ttraction of each *article,
JorkingJ on the in&estigate' *article 'e*en's on to factors1 an initial
magnit"'e of (ttraction Diel' of the *article an' the 'istance from it to the
in&estigate' *article#
It t"rns o"t that in any conglomerate the larger total Diel' of (ttraction
acts on the *articles that are locate' closer to the center, an' in hich
ethereal flo they get, rather than on the *articles aay from the center# The
magnit"'e of the Diel' of (ttraction - is the &elocity of ethereal flo# The
more is the Diel' of (ttraction, the greater is the rate of entering of Ether
into a transforme' *article# It is nothing like a )eculia" mathematical
)henomenon# B"t it eI*lains, for eIam*le, the ca"se of high tem*erat"re of
celestial $o'ies in the center than at the *eri*hery#
Beca"se of this Ether totally enters into the *articles closer to the
center at a higher s*ee' than into the *articles closer to the *eri*hery# (n',
accor'ingly, the 'egree of their transformation is higher#
5etKs o$ser&e, for eIam*le, a com*leI of fi&e *articles ith the same
magnit"'e of Diel's of (ttraction arraye' in one line#

The 'egree of transformation of each *article 'e*en's on its *osition
on the line#
5et the magnit"'e of the Diel' of (ttraction of each *article at a
'istance of location of a'jacent *article corres*on's to C con&entional
"nits# ?ith increase of the 'istance the magnit"'e of (ttraction Diel'
'ecreases# Therefore, at a 'istance of to *articles the Diel' of (ttraction
of the same *article ill $e less - . con&entional "nits#
In this case there are fi&e *articles# (n' e in&estigate the 'egree of
transformation of the *article locate' in the center# Drom one en' to
*articles are se*arate' it an' from other - also to# ItKs symmetry#
5etKs fin' the total Diel' of (ttraction acting on the *article in the
center1 C con&entional "nits e m"lti*ly $y 2 FC * 2 T -,G, . stan'ar' "nits
e m"lti*ly $y 2 F. * 2 T =G, -, U = T -=#
-= con&entional "nits - is the magnit"'e of the total Diel' of
(ttraction in an ethereal flo of hich there is a *article in the center# This
is the Diel' of (ttraction *l"s its on 6ra&ity Diel' of the *article : that is
the &elocity at hich Ether enters into the *article on $oth si'es#
Into those to *articles that are locate' on the secon' *lace from the
e'ge Ether ill enter at less total rate an' therefore they ill $e transforme'
lesser as com*are' to the central *article# This is eI*laine' $y the fact that
the total 6ra&ity Diel' of to secon' *articles from the e'ge is smaller in the
magnit"'e#
Here are the calc"lations#
5etKs m"lti*ly C con&entional "nits $y 21 C * 2 T -,#
To -, e a'' ; an' .1 -, U . U ; T -9#
-9 con&entional "nits - is the magnit"'e of the total Diel' of (ttraction
acting on the *articles are locate' on the secon' *lace at the e'ge# This total
Diel' of (ttraction *l"s on 6ra&ity Diel' of the *article : this is a rate of
3 / / 3
entering of Ether into these *articles on $oth si'es# The 'egree of
transformation res*ecti&ely ill $e a**ro*riate#

Into those to *articles that are locate' at the e'ges Ether enters ith
the least total &elocity, so they ill $e transforme' at a least 'egree#
This is eI*laine' $y the fact that the total Diel' of (ttraction acting on
each of the $o"n'ary *articles 'ecreases#
?e *erform calc"lations#
C con&entional "nits *l"s . con&entional "nits, *l"s ; *l"s 21 C U . U ;
U 2 T -. con&entional "nits#
-. - is the &al"e of the total Diel' of (ttraction acting on each of to
*articles at the e'ges# The rate of entering of eIternal Ether into the *articles
at the e'ge is ; "nits less than into the *articles on the secon' *lace, an' .
"nits less than into the *articles in the center# The 'egree of transformation
of the *articles of the &ery e'ge is less on the same n"m$er of "nits#
/
3
/
4
ThatLs all# This as e&i'ence that the closer is the *article to the center
of the com*leI of *articles, the more it is transforme'# In the a$o&e
eIam*les the 'egree of transformation 'e*en's on the n"m$er of *articles
on the line an' on the *osition of the in&estigate' *article on the line Fan', of
co"rse, on the initial magnit"'e of the Diel' of (ttraction of each *articleG#
The *ict"re of transformation ill $e e&en more com*licate' if the initial
magnit"'e of the Diel's of (ttraction of *articles on the line ill not $e the
same, $"t 'ifferent# (n' it ill $e increasingly 'iffic"lt if e consi'er that
on the line can $e locate' not only *articles ith Diel's of (ttraction, $"t
also *articles ith Diel's of Re*"lsion# (n' this *rocess of the transforming
effect of *articles on each other ha**ens e&eryhere# (ssess the scale of
hat is ha**ening# E&en one single *article ith the Diel' of (ttraction
somehere on the other si'e of the "ni&erse has a transformati&e effect on
the *articles of elements in yo"r $o'y# E&en if this infl"ence is negligi$le
'"e to an "nimagina$le 'istance# B"t it still eIists#
( transforme' *article can $e not only the *article ith the Diel' of
(ttraction, $"t ith the Diel' of Re*"lsion# (n' if it is relate' to the hol'ing
an' transforming it the *article ith the Diel' of (ttraction, then Ether ill
enter into it at high s*ee' thanks to the Diel' of (ttraction of the transforme'
*article that lea' to transformation# Hoe&er, the *article ith the Diel' of
Re*"lsion thanks to emitte' Ether re'"ces in front of itself the magnit"'e of
the Diel' of (ttraction of the attracting it an' JorkingJ on it *article ith
the Diel' of (ttraction# Beca"se of this the rate of entering of Ether
'ecreases an' the 'egree of transformation 'ecreases too# (n' the greater is
-
2
;
.
the magnit"'e of the Diel' of Re*"lsion, the more it ill eaken the effect
of the Diel' of (ttraction of transforming *article#
( *article ith a Diel' of Re*"lsion can ne&er transform $y the Diel'
of (ttraction any *article $eca"se it has no necessary for this : i#e# the Diel'
of (ttraction# (ltho"gh, as e ill analy3e in the f"t"re, the *articles ith
the Diel's of Re*"lsion are greatly ca*a$le of transform other *articles "sing
their Diel's of Re*"lsion#
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>o consi'er again the mechanism of transformation $y gra&itation, $"t an
eIam*le of a chemical element : a s*herical conglomerate consisting of
elementary *articles of 'ifferent H"ality#
(ny chemical element of the Mineral !ing'om F*hysics an'
chemistry eI*lore namely the elements of this king'omG is ma'e "* of
elementary *articles of only one %lan - %hysical# The %hysical %lan, as ell
as the (stral an' Mental, is characteri3e' $y the fact that *articles ith
Diel's of (ttraction are 'ominate' in its com*osition# (n' com*are' to the
(stral an' Mental %lans the magnit"'e of the Diel's of (ttraction of the
*articles of the %hysical %lan has the greatest &al"e# Des*ite the fact that in
the chemical elements of 'ifferent ty*es the *articles of 'ifferent layers of
A Fie) of
A$$%ac$ion of
a$$%ac$iEe
*a%$ice
E(i$$e) E$he% )ec%ea#e# $he Fie) of
A$$%ac$ion
An a$$%ac$e) *a%$ice
wi$h a Fie) of Re*!#ion
An a$$%ac$e) *a%$ice
wi$h a Fie) of
A$$%ac$ion
the %hysical %lan are re*resente' 'ifferently, in all elements of the Mineral
!ing'om the *articles ith the Diel's of (ttraction *re&ail# Drom all this e
can concl"'e the folloing - all chemical elements of the Mineral !ing'om
initially a total Diel' of (ttraction *re&ails o&er a total Diel' of Re*"lsion#
Initially - that means o"t of the *rocess of a''itional acc"m"lation of
elementary *articles on the s"rface of chemical elements Ffor eIam*le, all
the chemical elements of the Earth acc"m"late on their s"rface solar
*articles - *hotonsG# Therefore, in any chemical element initially a total Diel'
of (ttraction 'ominates o&er a total Diel' of Re*"lsion#
(n' no $ack to here e starte'# 4f co"rse, in s"ch conglomerate
of elementary *articles, here so many *articles ith Diel's of (ttraction
com$ine', transformation $y gra&itation of the /rinse'0 $y Ether *articles
can not fail to occ"r# In any element alays many other *articles /orks0 on
any *article# JBehin' the $ackJ of any *article in m"lti*le 'irections there is
alays a h"ge n"m$er of *articles that increases the rate of entering of Ether
thanks to the joining of their Diel's of (ttraction#
The total rate of Ether, *assing thro"gh the *articles an' their 'egree
of transformation increases toar's the center of a chemical element# (n'
for the same reasons that ha&e $een s*ecifie' for a com*leI of fi&e *articles
arraye' in a line# If e estimate the total Diel' of (ttraction acting on an
in&estigate' *article from the si'e of all other *articles of a s*herical
conglomerate, it o"l' $e 'e*en'ent on the *osition of the *article in
com*osition of the conglomerate# )om*are, for eIam*le, a *article from the
*eri*hery of a chemical element ith a *article from the center# (lrea'y e
can imme'iately notice that $eteen the *article from the center an' any
other *article of the conglomerate s"ch large 'istances ill $V not, as in the
case of *articles from the *eri*hery# Ao" can see that a large *ercentage of
*articles of the conglomerate is locate' from an in&estigate' *article from
the *eri*hery at s"ch 'istances that a**roach to the &al"e of the 'iameter of
the s*here# ?hile the greatest 'istance for the *article from the center is not
greater than the ra'i"s of the chemical element# ( magnit"'e of the Diel' of
(ttraction, as e ha&e often re*eate', 'ecreases ith 'istance#
?e can talk a$o"t not only the transformation of in'i&i'"al
elementary *articles, $"t also the chemical elements# Since the elements are
constr"cte' of the *articles too, their transformation "ltimately also re'"ces
to the transformation of the *articles in them# ($o"t the feat"res of
transformation of chemical elements e ill talk s*ecially, in the se*arate
$ook JMechanics of $o'iesJ hen e talk a$o"t transformation of chemical
elements forming the $o'ies#
Here e sho"l' mention that the transformation *rocesses occ"rring
in the chemical elements take *lace an' in celestial $o'ies# (n' elements
an' celestial $o'ies ha&e a s*herical sha*e an' ha&e many similarities in the
str"ct"re, 'es*ite the 'ifference in si3e#
3/0 TRANSFORMATION OF THE DUALIT5 :5
ANTIGRA6ITATION >:5 THE FIELD OF RE1ULSION?
>ot only Ain *articles $"t also *articles Aang can eIert transformati&e
im*act on the s"rro"n'ing *articles# EIactly the same as any eIisting
*articles ith the Diel' of (ttraction has a transformati&e effect on all the
other *articles of the "ni&erse, an' it makes any eIisting *article ith the
Diel' of Re*"lsion - it contri$"tes to the transformation of all the *articles of
The *a%$ice i#
in $he cen$e% of
che(ica
ee(en$
The *a%$ice i# on
$he *e%i*he%, of
$he ee(en$
the "ni&erse# Hoe&er, '"e to the range of *ossi$le 'istances $eteen the
*articles the *ro'"ce' effect ten's to 3ero# >e&ertheless, each *article in the
elements of o"r $o'ies JfeelsJ that some *article ith the Diel' of Re*"lsion
anyhere in the "ni&erse e&ery moment emits Ether into ethereal fiel' of the
"ni&erse#
?hat is the mechanism of transformation $y the Diel' of Re*"lsion@
To talk a$o"t the transformation $y the Diel' of Re*"lsion is more
com*licate' than the transformation $y the mo&ement or $y the Diel' of
(ttraction# (n' all $eca"se the mo&ement an' gra&ity is &ery nat"ral
*rocesses in the orl' aro"n' "s in the com*osition of celestial $o'ies#
?hile antigra&itation is less o$&io"s "n'er these con'itions# Merge the
*articles ith the Diel's of (ttraction in the conglomerate a"tomatically
entails the transformation $y attraction# ?hile *articles ith the Diel's of
Re*"lsion 'o not create conglomerates an' into eIisting enter ith
'iffic"lty# Ether emitte' $y the *article Aang, more often if *ossi$le, j"st
*"shes aay the s"rro"n'ing *articles or re*elle' itself# (n' only if there is
an o$stacle to 'istance the s"rro"n'ing *articles or this *article Aang itself,
there is transformation $y antigra&itation# Emitte' Ether *asses thro"gh the
s"rro"n'ing *articles an' heats them in s"ch manner#
(s mentione' earlier, there are to Jmetho'sJ of transformation of the
*articles ith the Diel' of Re*"lsion# Dirst - is the t"ans'o"mation b0 Ethe"
emitte& b0 the )a"ticles Yan$ in the con$lome"ates# (n' the secon' - is the
t"ans'o"mation at the collision with Ethe" emitte& b0 the )a"ticles movin$
b0 ine"tia#
In or'er to "n'erstan' the transformation $y antigra&itation $y the
first /metho'0, e m"st 'etermine the str"ct"ral feat"res of a chemical
element# ?hat is it@
( chemical element is a conglomerate consisting as of in'i&i'"al
*articles an' of smaller conglomerates - "nsta$le *articles hich incl"'e
*rotons, ne"trons, electrons, *ositrons an' others# Different ty*es of *hotons
that make "* the chemical elements are sta$le *articles, in'i&isi$le# %hotons
are *art of ne"trons, *rotons, electrons, *ositrons an' other "nsta$le
*articles# The n"m$er of *ossi$le &ariations of "nsta$le *articles in the
H"alitati&e an' H"antitati&e com*osition of the sta$le *articles is incre'i$ly
large# Imagine to yo"rself that fe *articles are se*arate' from "nsta$le
*article, $"t in the en' - it is a little $it 'ifferent ty*e of *articles than it as
$efore# B"t letKs $ack to the transformation#
( chemical element consists of a *l"rality of smaller conglomerates#
(s at the celestial $o'y it has some lighter "nsta$le *articles an' some
hea&ier# 5ight chemical elements in a celestial $o'y are locate' on the
*eri*hery, an' hea&y are closer to the center# (n' the same is in a chemical
element1 the lighter "nsta$le *articles form a shell Fthe atmos*here an'
hy'ros*hereG, hile the hea&ier - 'enser central $asis# 5ight "nsta$le
*articles contain many *articles Aang, an' hea&y - a little#
To ill"strate the transformation $y emitte' Ether is $etter $y the
eIam*le of the im*act on the $o'ies locate' on the s"rface of the *lanet ith
the hel* of that hat e call the atmos)he"ic )"essu"e#
)hemical elements, atmos*heric gases, acc"m"lating solar *articles
Aang, H"ickly form a total Diel' of Re*"lsion# Since the o&erlying layers of
the atmos*here *re&ent to the chemical elements of loer layers to mo&e
aay from the *lanet s"rface, Ether of the loer *enetrates the $o'ies ith
hich it contacts an' heats them in s"ch ay : i#e# transforms#
EIactly the same thing ha**ens in the com*osition of chemical
elements# ?hen the *articles hin'er to the light *articles to mo&e aay from
the center, they J*enetrateJ them $y emitte' Ether an' transform Fi#e# heatG#
So, as yo" can see, there is a com*lete similarity of *rocesses an'
*henomena occ"rring in the macro-an' microcosm# (n' the *rocess of
transformation of emitte' Ether similar to the *re&io"sly 'escri$e' *rocesses
of transformation $y motion an' $y gra&itation# Ether emitte' $y the *article
Aang *"ts *ress"re on the Ether filling the *article hich it contacts# He
enters into the front hemis*here of the *article an' its reH"ire' amo"nt
'isa**ears in the Sone of Destr"ction of the *article instea' of Ether, $orn in
the *article# Does this Ether satisfy the /nee's0 of transforme' *article f"lly
or *artially, it 'e*en's, first, on the rate of emission of Ether Fof the
magnit"'e of the Diel' of Re*"lsionG $y transforming *article# (n'
secon'ly, on the rate of 'estr"ction of Ether in the transforme' *article# If
emitte' Ether enters into the *article at a rate eH"al to or greater than the rate
of 'estr"ction of Ether in it, all $orn Ether, hich is "s"ally entere' into the
front hemis*here an' 'estroye' there, no release' an' mo&es to the rear
hemis*here, together ith amo"nt of $orn Ether that comes $ack there
Jro"tinelyJ# There occ"rs a 'estr"ction of the 'eman'e' amo"nt of Ether#
(n' if there is an eIcess, it is o"t*"tte' o"t of the *article in the form of
Re*"lsion Diel'# If the total amo"nt of Ether that release' to the rear
hemis*here, is less than or eH"al to the rate of 'estr"ction, the Diel' of
Re*"lsion arises# The Diel' of (ttraction Fif e are talking a$o"t a *article
AinG is j"st re'"ce'# (n' if the rate of 'estr"ction is more, there occ"rs a
Diel' of Re*"lsion# If the transforme' *article is Aang, its Diel' of Re*"lsion
increases#
It sho"l' $e note' the folloing# The &elocity of entering of Ether into
the *article can imme'iately eIcee' the rate of 'estr"ction of Ether in the
front hemis*here# Then, sim"ltaneo"sly ith the release of Ether that $orn in
the *articles in its rear hemis*here some eIcess of eIternal Ether enters into
its rear hemis*here# (n' then the *ro$a$ility increases that at a *article ith
the Diel' of (ttraction this fiel' 'oes not only 'ecrease, $"t a Diel' of
re*"lsion ill occ"r# (ccor'ingly, there is an increase of the Diel' of
Re*"lsion at a *article Aang#
Here is the mechanism of transformation of *articles $y
antigra&itation# (s yo" can see, it is com*letely analogo"s to mechanisms of
other Jays of transformationJ#
Hoe&er, e ha&e 'escri$e' only one of to ays to JgetJ the
transformation $y emitte' Ether# The secon' ay - is the t"ans'o"mation at
a collision o' )a"ticles#
?e ha&e not yet 'isc"sse' in 'etail inertia# ( little later, in the articles
'e'icate' to this s"$ject of mechanics, e kno that any *article that
entere' into the state of inertial motion certainly emits Ether $y the rear
hemis*here# EIactly this Diel' of Re*"lsion an' s"**orts its mo&ement $y
inertia#
?hen mo&ing *article enco"nters on the ay other *article a collision
occ"rs# Mo&ing *article can not *ass thro"gh another *article# It either
mo&es it "* an' forces to mo&e in the same 'irection an' that itself or
$o"nces an' changes 'irection or sto*s# 4n the mechanism of the collision
e 'isc"ss in 'etail in f"t"re articles ith corres*on'ing titles#
If the *article as mo&ing $y inertia alone, transformation ill not
ha**en at a collision# ( *article, ith hich the mo&ing *article colli'es, is
not transforme' $y emitte' Ether of mo&ing *article# In this case, if the
mo&ing *article has the a$ility to change the 'irection of mo&ement : to
*"sh off - it 'oes it# The *article ith hich it colli'es, an' hich it co"l'
not $"'ge $ecomes for it an ins"rmo"nta$le o$stacle# The *article 'oes not
mo&e, for eIam*le, hen it is incl"'e' in the com*osition of the chemical
element, an' it, in t"rn, is a *art of the $o'y# This *article on the ay is
stationary Ether hich canKt enter into it $eca"se it is not free an' can not
mo&e o&er# In this case, the rear hemis*here of the mo&ing *article $ecomes
the front an' the front : the rear# (n' a *article is re*elle' $y its on
emitte' Ether#
Hoe&er, if the *article mo&e' not alone, $"t as *art of the flo of
other elementary *articles, or as *art of a conglomerate, the *articles mo&ing
$ehin' it *re&ent to $o"nce it - either free or as *art of a conglomerate,
hich incl"'es o"r *article# Beca"se of this *article is san'iche' $eteen
the *articles on $oth si'es# (n' Ether emitte' $y its rear hemis*here Fformer
frontG *asses thro"gh the *article ith hich it colli'es# (n' heats it -
transforms its H"ality# The mechanism of transformation is similar to that
'escri$e' *re&io"sly#
By the ay, Eust because in the collisions o' bo&ies the"e is thei"
&est"uction 4 )a"tial o" 'ull # avulsion o' )a"ts o' colli&in$ bo&ies,
es)eciall0 in the contact ?one3 A'te" all the heatin$ o' the )a"ticles in the
elements o' the bo&ies wea8ens the bon&s between the chemical elements
an& between molecules#
(ny *article ith the Diel' of Re*"lsion Jla&esJ the s"rro"n'ing
*articles $y emitte' Ether# (n' this emitte' Ether transforms the la&e'
*articles, since on these *articles in this case, there is increasing the *ress"re
of Ether# Moreo&er, the emitte' $y the *article Ether mo&es from itself
s"rro"n' Ether, an' as the res"lt the increase of *ress"re of Ether not only
s"rro"n'ing *articles eI*erience this, $"t also those that are $ehin' them# (s
in the case of *articles ith the Diel' of (ttraction, ith the 'istance the
*ress"re of Ether, the ca"se of hich is the *article ith the Diel' of
Re*"lsion, 'ecreases#
In a''ition to the transformation of the s"rro"n'ing *articles, Ether
emitte' $y the *article ith the Diel' of Re*"lsion *ost*ones Fre*elsG from
itself these s"rro"n'ing it *articles# Besi'es emitte' Ether re*els from the
s"rro"n'ing *articles this &ery *article that emits Ether# Deat"res of the
*rocess of re*"lsion from each other these *articles 'e*en's, first, on the
magnit"'e of the Diel' of Re*"lsion of the transforming *article, an'
secon'ly, on the H"ality of the s"rro"n'ing *articles#
The farther the *article ith the Diel' of Re*"lsion is locate' from the
s"rro"n'ing *articles, hich it transforms, the smaller the &al"e of the
'egree of transformation of these *articles# If the transforming *article ith
the Diel' of Re*"lsion an' others *articles s"rro"n'ing it ha&e the
*ossi$ility to mo&e aay from each other, then gra'"ally ith the increase
of the 'istance $eteen them, the *ress"re of emitte' Ether is re'"ce' an',
accor'ingly, the magnit"'e of the 'egree of transformation 'ecreases#
Hoe&er, &ery often in the orl' aro"n' "s, there are factors that
*re&ent the *articles mo&e aay from the *articles ith the Diel's of
Re*"lsion# Dor eIam*le, s"ch sit"ation occ"rs in any chemical element#
Elementary *articles in any chemical element are com$ine' $y the total
Diel' of (ttraction of this chemical element# The centri*etal Diel' of
(ttraction of this element *lays the greatest role# It is thanks to this fiel'
Ether from the s"rro"n'ing ethereal fiel' mo&es toar' the center of the
element# 7s"ally in any element *articles ith Re*"lsion Diel's scattere'
among *articles ith Diel's of (ttraction# Emitte' $y them Ether also
streams in the 'irection of the center of element# Hoe&er, $efore this
occ"rs, emitte' Ether eIerts *ress"re on the s"rro"n'ing *articles an'
there$y transforms them#
In the orl' aro"n' "s to Jtransformation metho'sJ : $y attraction
an' $y re*"lsion - e&eryhere coeIist# ?hat "nites them is that they are
ty*ical for elementary *articles as in statics an' in 'ynamics : i#e# hether
*articles are at rest or mo&ing# These to Jtransformation metho'sJ are &ery
common in o"r 5ogoic %lan, "niting in the com*osition of chemical
elements in one hole elementary *articles of &arying H"ality - ith Diel's
of (ttraction an' Diel's of Re*"lsion# E&eryhere, in any conglomerate of
*articles, here the *articles ith $oth ty*es of Dorce Diel's are *resente',
these *articles are transforme' $y these to Jays of transformationJ#
330 1HENOMENA EF1LAIN :5 THE LAW OF
TRANSFORMATION
Transformation of the eIternal manifestation of the H"ality is the $asis
of the &ariety of knon *hysical an' chemical *rocesses an' *henomena#
?e list the main ones1
-G (ny case of raise of the tem*erat"re of the chemical elements of
matterB
2G Emission $y the heate' chemical elements of 'ifferent ty*es of
elementary *articles, mainly 'ifferent ty*es of *hotonsB emission of o*tical
*hotons Fof the &isi$le rangeG is a Jlight emissionJB
;G Reflection of elementary *articles of &arying H"ality emitte' or
reflecte' $y other chemical elementsB reflection of o*tical *hotons is a
Jreflection of lightJB
.G Emission of elementary *articles of 'ifferent H"ality in the co"rse
of the ra'ioacti&e 'ecay of hea&y elements#
340 GENERAL INFORMATION A:OUT THE INERTIA
?hat a on'erf"l *henomenon e see in e&ery'ay life an' call it the
ine"tia@ ?hen at the normal con'itions e *"sh the $o'y $eing in the state
of H"iescence on the s"rface of the soli' *hase of the *lanet, it $egins the
motion, $"t gra'"ally slos 'on# This *henomenon is most easily to
o$ser&e on eIam*le of the soli' $o'ies, not heate' to the com$"stion
tem*erat"re# Hoe&er, an' liH"i', an' gaseo"s, an' $"rning $o'ies $eha&e
in a similar manner - after *"shing they mo&e gra'"ally sloing#
To of the fo"n'er of classical mechanics - 6alileo 6alilei an' Isaac
>eton *laye' the main role in the st"'y of inertia#
In the mo'ern "n'erstan'ing of the meaning of this *henomenon a
consi'era$le conf"sion eIists#
6alileo an' >eton consi'ere' the inertia as the a$ility of $o'ies or
stay at H"iescence in the com*osition of the celestial $o'y Fon the s"rfaceG,
or sa&e the state of JstraightJ an' "niform motion# B"t at the same, in the
form"lation of the 5a of Inertia >eton as a com*"lsory con'ition for the
manifestation of inertia calle' the Ja$sence of action of eIternal forcesJ# (s
e kno, he attri$"te' to the forces incl"'ing the Dorce of (ttraction Ffor
eIam*le, the Dorce of 6ra&ity of the *lanetG# The a$sence of any hatsoe&er
JeIternal forcesJ Fincl"'ing the Dorce of (ttractionG is *ossi$le only "n'er
i'eal con'itions, i#e# in a totally em*ty s*ace# Here lies the main
J'isconnectJ in the c"rrent form"lation of the 5a of Inertia# 4f hat kin'
of JH"iescenceJ of the $o'y 'i' 6alileo an' >eton ant to talk - the
a$sol"te, hich is *ossi$le only "n'er i'eal con'itions, or a$o"t the
H"iescence, ca"se' $y the action of (ttraction Diel' of the *lanet@ In'ee', if
in a totally em*ty s*ace there is only one $o'y Fno matter hat, in any
aggregate stateG, then itKs tr"e, e co"l' talk a$o"t the com*lete a$sence of
eIternal infl"ences on it# The Diel's of (ttraction an' Re*"lsion of other
$o'ies o"l' carry aay it nohereB other $o'ies in motion o"l' not *"sh
it# (n' the $o'y might $e there in a totally em*ty s*ace in a state of a$sol"te
H"iescence# This JH"iescenceJ is real# B"t the JH"iescenceJ of the $o'y,
hich is the res"lt of its fiIation $y the Diel' of (ttraction of the celestial
$o'y, of hich it is *art, e can not to consi'er as a tr"e JH"iescenceJ#
Both scientists as the meas"re of inertia of $o'ies consi'er their mass#
The more the mass of the $o'y is, the greater the a$ility to inertia it sho"l'
ha&e# I#e# the hea&ier the $o'y, the more it ill resist that it mo&e' "* an'
set in motion, an' the longer it ill stay in the motion if it alrea'y mo&ing#
B"t is it all j"st easy as it seems, an' is e&erything eI*laine' right@ In fact,
the inter*retation of this *henomenon $y mo'ern *hysics - is a *"33le to
"n'erstan' that e offer yo" ith "s#
In mo'ern mechanics to the *henomenon of inertia scientists ten' to
incl"'e almost any case hen the $o'y is Jno h"rryJ to sto* its mo&ement#
Dor eIam*le, hen a $o'y is ca"se' to rotate or mo&e in a circle, an' then it
is not sto**e' imme'iately, this fact is eI*laine' $y inertia Fe j"st a'' that
itLs H"ite tr"eG# B"t at the same time, scientists-mechanics ten' to Jno retreatJ
of the or'ing of the 5a of Inertia, hich as *ro*ose' $y >eton# (n'
so to the *"re manifestations of inertia they referre' in the first *lace, all
cases in hich the $o'y is 'iffic"lt to set in motion, as ell as all cases hen
the $o'y is 'iffic"lt to sto* its JstraightJ mo&ement on the s"rface of the
*lanet Fthe H"otes are 'eli&ere' $eca"se hen the $o'y is mo&ing, for
eIam*le, on the roa' lai' on the s"rface of a celestial $o'y it is im*ossi$le
to talk a$o"t the straightnessG# Th"s, in mo'ern mechanics 'es*ite the
a$sence of 'e$ate an' contro&ersy, there is no one i'ea of hat to
"n'erstan' of inertia# (ltho"gh it is $elie&e' that e&erything is in or'er#
?hat e are going to "n'erstan' of JinertiaJ@ 4r resistance of the
$o'y to other $o'ies that ten' or to mo&e it, or to sto* its mo&ement along
the s"rface of the *lanet in a straight Fthere this or' is not in H"otes, as
6alileo an' >eton con'"cte' eI*eriments on inertia on smooth s"rfacesG
trajectory# 6alileo an' >eton "n'erstoo' inertia j"st so#
Either e mean $y JinertiaJ a H"ite another - namely, the a$ility to
sel'4"enewable movement, i#e# hen e talk a$o"t the a$ility of the $o'ies
j"st to sa&e the state o' movement# This a$ility has something in common
ith the eIisting in *hysics the J5a of conser&ation of im*"lseJ : i#e#
hile the $o'y *reser&es some "n$eknonst im*"lse, it ill mo&e Fno
matter in hat 'irection, it can constantly change itG an' re*ort this im*"lse
to other $o'ies in a collision ith them# Im*"lse as knon is the
m"lti*lication of mass an' &elocity of the $o'y# %lease note - all of the same
m"lti*lication of mass an' &elocity, hich e fin' in the form"la of Dorce
F% @ maG, kinetic energy FT @ mOCB*G an' Energy FEinsteinLs form"la : E @
mcCG#
Drom the *ractical eI*erience e kno that the hea&ier the $o'y is,
the har'er it is to mo&e it off or change the 'irection of its mo&ement, if it is
alrea'y mo&ing# EIactly s"ch $o'ies, on the re*resentations of classical
mechanics, are the most inert# Th"s it is *ossi$le to e&al"ate not only the
inertness of soli' $o'ies $"t also those hich are at the normal con'itions in
the liH"i' or gaseo"s state, an' e&en $"rning# Hoe&er, $eca"se the liH"i'
an' gaseo"s $o'ies easily 'eforme' an' $roken hen mo&ing thro"gh other
$o'ies an' me'i"ms, their inertia is easiest to eIamine enclosing them in a
har' shell#
In or'er to fin' o"t hat lies in the $asis of inertia of the $o'ies, in the
first t"rn e sho"l' fin' o"t hether this *henomenon is ty*ical for
elementary *articles#
An& the answe" is Yes3
Aes, inertia inherent to elementary *articles# (n' not j"st inherent, an'
it is ith them e sho"l' $egin to st"'y this *henomenon, $eca"se the
$o'ies are com*ose' of chemical elements, hich in t"rn are com*ose' of
*articles#
Ine"tia o' elementa"0 )a"ticle - is its a$ility to maintain a state of
motion, 'es*ite the fact that the im*act ith hich the *article has $een le'
to a state of motion, is alrea'y a$sence# This is the hole essence of the
conce*t of /inertia0# B"t hy is the *article contin"es to mo&e e&en after the
eIternal factor that le' her to mo&e, sto**e' the im*act@ (n' 'oes e&ery
*article, regar'less of its H"ality is ca*a$le to inertial motion@
(t the heart of the inertial motion of the *articles lies the occ"rrence
in the *articles of the Dorce of Inertia# (n' the 5a of Transformation
accom*anies the inertia, namely, the transformation $y the mo&ement
relati&e to ethereal fiel'#
In hate&er con'itions inertial mo&ement of the *article ha**ens - in
real or i'eal - it m"st $egin ith the fact that some *article has le' the
*article to the state of motion# Ether of ethereal fiel' ith res*ect to hich
the *article mo&es, is eIcessi&e for it# Ethereal fiel' *resses on the Ether
filling the *article# It enters into the front hemis*here of the *article# (s a
res"lt, in the front hemis*here of the *article, in the Sone of Destr"ction,
there is the 'estr"ction of eIternal Ether instea' of its on, $orn in it#
Ether of ethereal fiel' thro"gh hich the *article mo&es, *assing
thro"gh the *article changes the o"tar' manifestation of its H"ality# This
*assing thro"gh the *article JeIcessi&eJ Ether f"lly or *artially J'e*ri&esJ
the *article of the Diel' of (ttraction# ?ill $e this 'eli&erance com*lete or
*artial, 'e*en's on the &elocity of the *article# The greater the s*ee' is, the
smaller the Diel' of (ttraction an' the greater the likelihoo' that there ill
$e a Diel' of Re*"lsion# If the *article ha' a Diel' of Re*"lsion, its &al"e
increases# %articles ith Diel's of (ttraction their &al"e 'ecreases only in the
rear hemis*here Frear : on the 'irection of motionG# (n' if there a Diel' of
Re*"lsion arises, it also manifests only in the rear hemis*here# %articles ith
Diel's of Re*"lsion their magnit"'e also increases only $ehin'# (gain, the
higher the s*ee' is ith hich the *article has $een le' in motion, the larger
the magnit"'e of the Diel' of Re*"lsion that arises#
Decrease of the Diel' of (ttraction or its re*lacement $y a Diel' of
Re*"lsion Fat the *articles AinG, or increase of the Diel' of re*"lsion Fat the
*articles AangG occ"rs $eca"se Ether of ethereal fiel' *assing thro"gh the
*eri*hery of the *article Fhere its 'estr"ction occ"rsG, $ecomes for a
*article eIcessi&e# If the s*ee' of entering of Ether is greater than the s*ee'
of 'estr"ction of, the *article $egins to emit its on create' Ether - a Diel'
of Re*"lsion a**ears at a *article For enhance' if it alrea'y has itG#
=h0 is )ossible an ine"tial motion at allP
(n' no act"ally a$o"t hy a *article shifts forar' relati&e to Ether
emitte' $y it $ackar'#
7n'er i'eal con'itions, the *article ith the Diel' of Re*"lsion emits
Ether "niformly o&er its entire s"rface# 8"st $eca"se of the eIistence of this
$alance $eteen all *oints of the s"rface the *article is at H"iescence on the
*lace an' 'oes not shift at any of the si'es#
In a state of inertial motion e con&entionally 'i&i'e the *article on 2
hemis*heres - front an' rear# D"e to the fact that after the initial *"sh the
*article shifts relati&e to the ethereal fiel', Ether *resses on the front
hemis*here, an' it can not emit Ether# Balance is 'ist"r$e'# The front
hemis*here 'oes not emit anything, an' the rear : the tice 'ose# Ether
coming from the rear hemis*here sim"ltaneo"sly re*els the *article itself
an' the s"rro"n'ing Ether# This ca"ses the *article to mo&e in the 'irection
here its front hemis*here JlooksJ#
370 THE FIELD OF RE1ULSION IS A COM1ULSOR5
CONDITION FOR THE EMERGENCE OF INERTIAL MOTION
4nly those *articles hich after $ringing them in motion ha&e a Diel'
of Re*"lsion - originally inherent or arising as a res"lt from the
transformation F"nim*ortantG : are ca*a$le to inertial motion#
The *article hich after $ringing it into motion sa&es in the rear
hemis*here the Diel' of (ttraction, ill not mo&e $y inertia# EI*lanation for
this is folloing#
Dor or'er to the *article co"l' mo&e $y inertia its rear hemis*here Fit
is allocate' con'itionallyG m"st emit Ether, hich as soon as t"rns o"t
o"tsi'e of the *article, *"shes it forar'# The *article, in hich in the rear
hemis*here the Diel' of (ttraction 'oes not 'isa**ear, of co"rse, can not
emit Ether# Entering into the *article eIternal Ether 'oes not come o"t of the
*article, creating or enhancing a Diel' of Re*"lsion $ehin', hile in the
*article there is a Jnee'J in 'isa**earing Ether in it# (n' only entering into
the *article Ether in &arying 'egrees satisfy its Jnee'J, then its on create'
in it Ether $egins to emit# )reate' Ether emits the more, than the nee's of
the *articles in the 'estr"ction of Ether are satisfie' $etter# If the *article
&elocity relati&e to the ethereal fiel' eIcee's the rate of 'isa**earance of
Ether in it, hereas in the Diel' of Re*"lsion of the *article an' the eIternal
Ether is incl"'e' : entering into the *article, $"t not 'estroying in it#
(n' here is the mechanism of inertial motion#
If the *article has a Diel' of Re*"lsion Fnat"rally eIisting or arising as
a res"lt of transformationG, then in the state of H"iescence Ether is "niformly
emitte' $y the *article in all 'irections# If the *article ith the Diel' of
Re*"lsion shifts relati&e to the ethereal fiel', Ether of ethereal fiel' 'oes not
let to Ether of the Diel' of Re*"lsion to $e emitte' in the front hemis*here of
the *article# Ether of ethereal fiel' entering into the *article eIerts *ress"re
on the Ether, that ten's to $e emitte' in the front hemis*here, an' makes it to
$e emitte' in the rear hemis*here#
Ether emitte' in the rear hemis*here is face' ith an ethereal fiel'
$ehin' the *article# (s a res"lt, $eteen Ether filling the *article an' ether of
ethereal fiel' $ehin' the *article occ"rs an eIcess of Ether - Ether ejecte'
from the *article# (s a res"lt, in the Ether filling the *article it is a**earing
the ten'ency to mo&e aay from this eIcess of Ether# 4therise, e can say
that ether filling the *article is re*elle' $y Ether s"**lante' from it# (n' the
*article contin"es the motion, hich in mechanics is calle' $y ine"tial
motion#
?e can say that the *henomenon of inertia literally em$o'ies the i'ea
of J)e")etuumJ, hich from time immemorial is a 'ream of mechanics-
engineers#
380 THE FORCE OF INERTIA
Ether emitte' $y the rear hemis*here of the *article mo&ing $y inertia,
this is the Dorce of Inertia# This %o"ce o' Ine"tia is the re*"lsion of Ether
filling the *article $y Ether emitte' $y it#
The magnit"'e of the Inertial Dorce is *ro*ortional to the rate of
emission of Ether $y the *article# I#e# the greater the Diel' of Re*"lsion of
the *article is, the greater the &al"e of occ"rring in it Dorce of Inertia#
?e recall that often an inertial motion of *articles imme'iately after
the *"sh $ecomes a "niform character# In this case the Diel' of re*"lsion of
the *article incl"'es not only Ether, $orn in the *article Fan' release'
$eca"se its 'estr"ction is re*lace' $y 'estroying of eIternal EtherG, $"t also
eIternal Ether, hich entere' into a *article an' not 'estroye' in it#
390 THE MAIN FEATURES OF INERTIAL MOTION
Since the time of 6alilei an' >eton the straightness an' eH"a$ility is
consi'ere' as the only to characteristics of inertial motion# B"t the reality
is somehat 'ifferent#
Isaac >eton as right, hen in the 5a of Inertia as a com*"lsory
con'ition of inertia has *ointe' the Jabsence o' action o' e5te"nal 'o"cesJ#
In'ee', only in a com*letely em*ty s*ace a trajectory of a *article
mo&ing $y inertia ne&er 'e&iate from a straight line#
In the real con'itions, here the s*ace is fille' ith *articles of all
kin's of H"ality an' e&eryhere gra&ity an' antigra&ity fiel's manifest, the
straightness of trajectory is necessarily &iolate'# If in the *article in a''ition
to the Inertial Dorce any more Dorce arises, then the *article, itho"t ceasing
to mo&e inertially, may at the same time shifts "n'er the infl"ence of other
force, for eIam*le, to come near to the so"rce of (ttraction Diel' or to mo&e
aay from the so"rce of Diel' of Re*"lsion# Ether emitte' $y the *article,
also contin"es to re*el it forar'# B"t at the same time the ethereal flo of
the Diel' of (ttraction or the Diel' of Re*"lsion shifts ith itself a *article#
(ccor'ingly, the mo&ement of the *article ceases to $e straight an' $ecomes
cu"ve&#
Hoe&er, not e&erything here is so sim*le# (n' the feat"res of the
motion of the *article - its s*ee' an' sha*e of the trajectory - 'e*en' on
many factors# Dirst, yo" nee' to consi'er what t0)es o' %o"ces actin$ on the
)a"ticle an& how man0 o' them# Secon'ly, yo" m"st consi'er the value o'
each o' the 'o"ces# (n', thir'ly, yo" nee' to kno un&e" what an$le the
vecto"s o' %o"ces a"e locate& "elative to one anothe"# 4nly assessing all
these factors, e can try to calc"late hat ill $e the 'irection an' &elocity
of a *article at any gi&en moment of time#
Besi'es, the cha"acte" o' the ine"tial movement o' the )a"ticles will
neve" be uni'o"mJ ItKs onl0 uneven, namel0 uni'o"ml0 &ecele"ate& an&
uni'o"ml0 accele"ate&3 (ccor'ingly, an "ne&en motion can $e 'escri$e' $y
a &al"e of 'eceleration or acceleration of the *article#
5etLs look at the *articles of hat H"ality an inertial *article motion
ill $e "niformly 'ecelerate' an' of hat H"ality it ill $e "niformly
accelerate'#
1) The uni'o"ml0 &ecele"ate& cha"acte" o' ine"tial motion3
The inertial motion of the *articles, hich initially Fo"tsi'e
transformationG has a Diel' of (ttraction - the *articles Ain - can only $e
uni'o"ml0 &ecele"ate&#
?hat ill $e the &elocity of a *article at any gi&en moment of time
'e*en's on to factors1
-G The magnit"'e of the initial &elocity of the *articleB
2G The H"ality of the *article#
5etKs eI*lain the "niformly 'eceleration $y follos#
(ny *article ith a Diel' of (ttraction so an' has a Diel' of (ttraction
that its rate 'estr"ction of Ether is greater than the rate of creation# In or'er
to ill"strate hat is ha**ening, letLs assign to the &al"e of the rate of
'estr"ction of Ether, i#e# the rate of creation, as ell as the rate ith hich
the *article is initially le' to the motion relati&ely to the ethereal fiel', some
con'itional &al"es that 'o not match the real, $"t tr"ly reflect the ratio of the
real magnit"'es#
>o e are talking a$o"t a *article ith a Diel' of (ttraction# This
means that the rate of 'estr"ction of Ether in it eIcee's the rate of creation#
Therefore, let the rate of 'estr"ction is eH"al to ; con&entional "nits, an' the
rate of creation : to - con&entional "nit# (s e ha&e seen, the Dorce of
Inertia : this is Ether emitte' $y the rear hemis*here of the *article, i#e# a
Diel' of Re*"lsion a**earing in the *article# The Dorce of Inertia is eH"al to
the magnit"'e of the Diel' of Re*"lsion, i#e# to the rate of emission rate of
Ether $y the rear hemis*here# (s is knon, the a**earing in the *article a
Diel' of Re*"lsion consists of on Ether of the *article li$erate' in it F$orn
thereG an' of eIternal Ether, entering, $"t not 'estroye'# 7ntil then, "ntil all
nascent Ether is not release', e canKt talk a$o"t accession to the Diel' of
Re*"lsion of eIternal Ether# In or'er to that all $orn in the *article Ether is
release' in the form of the Diel' of Re*"lsion, it is necessary that the rate of
'is*lacement of the *article relati&e to the ethereal fiel' is eH"al to the rate
of 'estr"ction of Ether# I#e# in o"r case it is eH"al to ; con&entional "nits#
Then the magnit"'e of the Diel' of Re*"lsion arising in the *article is eH"al
to - con&entional "nit that corres*on's to the rate of creation of Ether# If the
&elocity of the initial 'is*lacement of the *article is less than ; con&entional
"nits, then a Diel' of Re*"lsion is less than - con&entional "nit# ( Diel' of
Re*"lsion eH"al to - con&entional "nit shifts the *article also on a rate eH"al
to - con&entional "nit that ill lea' to f"rther 'ecrease of the magnit"'e of
the Diel' of Re*"lsion#
( Diel' of Re*"lsion ith a &al"e less than ; con&entional "nits,
hich arises in the *article in the rear hemis*here, 'oes not allo to *"sh a
*article ith s"ch s*ee' that o"l' f"lly satisfy the nee' of the *article in
'estroye' Ether# (s a res"lt, less Ether is release' hich is $orn in the
*article# The more its amo"nt is Js*entJ $y the *article itself# (s a res"lt, a
Diel' of Re*"lsion 'ecreases, hich re'"ces the &elocity of the *article#
Re'"cing of the s*ee' makes the *article a$sor$ an e&en larger *art of Ether
create' in it, hich f"rther re'"ces the Diel' of Re*"lsion of the *article, etc#
(n' so it carrie' o"t a gra'"al 'eceleration of the inertial motion of a
*article ith a Diel' of (ttraction# (n', accor'ingly, the nat"re of s"ch
inertial motion is "niformly 'ecelerate'#
In assessing the &al"e of the s*ee' ith hich the *article sho"l'
initially 'is*lace' to its inertial motion is tho"gh "niformly 'ecelerate', $"t
still long eno"gh, yo" sho"l' also remem$er that there are *articles ith the
same magnit"'e of Diel's of (ttraction, $"t they 'iffer in $oth the rate of
'isa**earance of Ether, an' in the rate of creation#
*) The uni'o"ml0 accele"ate& cha"acte" o' ine"tial motion3
In the *articles ha&ing Diel's of Re*"lsion an' o"t of the
transformation *rocess - the *articles Aang - inertial motion can only $e
uni'o"ml0 accele"ate&# (n' j"st as in the case of *articles ith Diel's of
(ttraction, the s*ee' of inertial motion at each moment of time is
'etermine' $y to factors1
-G The magnit"'e of the initial &elocity of the *articleB
2G The H"ality of the *article#
5etKs eI*lain the reasons for the "niformly accelerate' character of
inertial motion of *articles Aang#
(ll *articles ith Diel's of Re*"lsion an' $eca"se *ossess $y the
Diel's of Re*"lsion that their s*ee' of creation of Ether is more than the
s*ee' of 'estr"ction#
5et "s, $y analogy ith *articles Ain e estimate the rate of
'estr"ction of Ether, i#e# the s*ee' of creation, as ell as the s*ee' ith
hich the *article is initially le' to the motion relati&ely to the ethereal fiel',
"sing a$stract con&entional "nits, tr"ly reflect the ratio of these &al"es#
In the *article ith the Diel' of Re*"lsion the rate of creation of Ether
alays eIcee's the rate of 'estr"ction# 5et the rate of 'estr"ction is eH"al to
- con&entional "nit, an' the rate of creation - to ; con&entional "nits# (s
alrea'y mentione', the Dorce of Inertia this is Ether emitte' $y the rear
hemis*here of the *article, i#e# a Diel' of Re*"lsion, hich in this case
increases# The Dorce of Inertia is eH"al to the magnit"'e of the Diel' of
Re*"lsion, i#e# to the rate of emission of Ether $y the rear hemis*here# The
Diel' of Re*"lsion consists of on Ether of the *article release' in it F$orn
thereG an' of eIternal Ether, entering, $"t not 'estroye'# 7ntil all nascent
Ether is not release', there is no joining to the Diel' of Re*"lsion of eIternal
Ether#
(s mentione' earlier, the *article can mo&e inertially only hen
entering into Ether in front of it if it satisfies the Jnee'J of the *article on
Ether, an' as a res"lt in a *article a Diel' of Re*"lsion a**ears# B"t *articles
that initially ha&e Diel's of Re*"lsion nee' not to seek its emergence ith
the hel* of transformation# Transformation can only increase the Diel' of
Re*"lsion# Th"s, e&en the minim"m initial &elocity of the *article ith the
Diel' of Re*"lsion increases this Diel', $eca"se to nat"rally eIisting Diel' of
Re*"lsion that amo"nt of create' Ether is a''e', hich $eca"se of the
entering into the *article Ether in front of it sto*s it "se' for 'estr"ction#
E&en the initial s*ee' eH"al to - W of - con&entional "nit ill lea' to the
increase of the Diel' of Re*"lsion an' the $eginning of inertial motion#
Increase of the Diel' of Re*"lsion increases the rate at hich the emitte'
Ether *"shes the *article forar'# Increase of the s*ee' of the motion again
lea's to increase of the Diel' of Re*"lsion of the *article, hich f"rther
increases the &elocity of the *article, etc# The *rocess of the groing of the
Diel' of Re*"lsion an', conseH"ently, of the acceleration of the *article
contin"es "ntil all Jnee' J in the 'estroye' Ether 'oes not cease to $e
satisfie' at the eI*ense of the reso"rces of on Ether create' in the *article
an' 'oes not start f"lly re*lenishe' $y Ether entering into the *article in
front of it# (fter that, the inertial motion of a *article is sta$ili3e', ceases to
accelerate an' $ecomes "niform# In this case the &elocity of the *article is
eH"al to the s*ee' of creation of Ether $y the *article# >ote, it is not to the
s*ee' of nat"rally eIisting at the *article the Diel' of Re*"lsion Fi#e#, o"tsi'e
of the *rocess of transformationG, namely the s*ee' of creation of Ether#
?e can s"m "* an' concl"'e that the *articles hich ha&e Diel's of
Re*"lsion an' o"t of the *rocess of transformation can $e le' to a state of
inertial motion m"ch easier com*are' ith the *articles initially ha&e Diel's
of (ttraction# The or' JeasierJ means that for *articles ith Diel's of
Re*"lsion, any e&en the minim"m initial s*ee' fits# ?hile not e&ery initial
s*ee' ill ca"se the inertial motion of a *article ith a Diel' of (ttraction#
3;0 INERTIA OF 1ARTICLES IN REAL CONDITIONS
Disc"sse' a little earlier the main characteristics of the inertial motion
of elementary *articles itho"t any a''itional con'itions are a**lica$le only
to i'eal con'itions# Aes, only in i'eal con'itions, the trajectory of the *article
ill alays remain straight# (s for &elocity of the *article at each moment of
time, $"t only in a com*letely em*ty s*ace all the feat"res of "niformly
accelerate' or of "niformly 'ecelerate' motion of the *articles ill fit to the
*erfect ones *recisely#
In reality, in inertially mo&ing *articles in a''itional to the Inertial
Dorce many other forces, the ca"ses of hich are alrea'y ell knon1
-G Diel's of (ttraction of other o$jectsB
2G Diel's of Re*"lsionB
;G %ress"re from other *articles Fmo&ing or Jin H"iescenceJ in the
conglomerate of *articlesG#
I#e# in real con'itions on the inertially mo&ing *article many other
forces can sim"ltaneo"sly act - (ttraction, Re*"lsion, %ress"re# Dor
eIam*le, some *article is mo&ing $y inertia# (n' sim"ltaneo"sly Ether,
thro"gh hich it mo&ing, is shifte' "n'er the infl"ence of the Diel' of
(ttraction of any o$ject# Inertial Dorce com*etes ith the Dorce of
(ttraction#
4r the s"rro"n'ing Ether is shifte' re*elle' $y the Diel' of Re*"lsion#
4r some mo&ing *article crash into another mo&ing *article# I#e# Inertial
Dorce o**oses the Dorce of %ress"re of the *article s"rface# In any case, e
m"st 'etermine the angle $eteen the &ectors of the Dorces# (n' also to fin'
o"t the &al"e of the Dorces# (fter this, on the R"le of %arallelogram e ill
kno the 'irection an' magnit"'e of the res"ltant force#
These other forces arising in the inertially mo&ing *article com*ete in
magnit"'e ith the Inertial Dorce, mo&ing the *article# (s a res"lt of acting
of these forces the 'irection of motion of a *article can change#
Sim"ltaneo"sly ith the 'irection, "s"ally it is changing the &elocity of the
*article meas"re' at each moment of time - either increases or 'ecreases
F'on to 3eroG# The changing of the 'irection of motion of a *article 'oes
not lea' to the 'isa**earance of the Inertial Dorce FeIce*t cases hen the
s*ee' 'ro*s to 3eroG# I#e# a *article contin"es to mo&e $y inertia# Hoe&er
an' the magnit"'e of this force, an' 'irection of the &ector changes#
In or'er to kno the 'irection an' magnit"'e of the &ector of res"ltant
force, hich arises in a res"lt of acting on a *article mo&ing $y inertia an'
e&en other forces, e t"rn to the R"le of %arallelogram# Diagonal 'ran
from the same *oint, here is the start of &ectors of initial Dorces Fone of
hich m"st $e Inertial DorceG - this is the res"ltant force &ector#
(s *re&io"sly mentione', in assessing of the s*ee' an' 'irection of
motion of the *article '"e to the im*act on it more than one force e nee'
take into acco"nt a n"m$er of factors# Here they are1
-G The magnit"'e of the forces acting on the *article, an' their total
n"m$erB
2G The angle $eteen the &ectors of the DorcesB
;G The ty*e of forces acting on the *article#
(''itionally, for the Dorce of Inertia e can fin' o"t the general
character of the mo&ement : "niformly 'ecelerate' or "niformly accelerate',
an' also hat is &al"e of the acceleration or 'eceleration#
%article &elocity increases if s*ee', ca"se' $y the action of any Diel'
of (ttraction or Re*"lsion is a''e' to the s*ee' ca"se' $y the magnit"'e of
the Inertial Dorce# This is $eca"se the *article mo&es relati&e to ethereal
fiel', an' at the same time the &ery ethereal fiel', as ell as Ether, filling the
*article are shifte' "n'er the infl"ence of the ca"se of the Dorce : Diel' of
(ttraction or Diel' of Re*"lsion# ?hat ill $e the trajectory of a *article, if
in a''ition to the Inertial Dorce the Dorce of (ttraction or Dorce of Re*"lsion
arises in it, 'e*en's on1
-G The initial 'irection of the inertial motion of a *articleB
2G The s*ee' of the inertial motion of a *article, meas"re' *er "nit of
timeB
;G The magnit"'e of the Diel' of (ttraction of attracting or the Diel'
of Re*"lsion of re*"lsi&e o$ject#
In any case, for the inertially mo&ing *article, there are only to
&ersions of e&ents1
-G The *article ill fly *ast the o$jects ith the Diel's of (ttraction or
Re*"lsion, in one ay or another attracting $y the Diel' of (ttraction or
re$o"n'ing $y the Diel' of Re*"lsionB
2G The *article ill not *ass the o$ject ith the Diel' of (ttraction or
Re*"lsion instea' it ill $e attracte' to the o$ject ith the Diel' of
(ttraction or 'rastically 'e&iate from the o$ject ith the Diel' of Re*"lsion#
4r instea' of acting of Diel's of (ttraction an' Re*"lsion it may $e
that inertially mo&ing *article colli'es ith another *article - either tr"ly
motionless, or ith a JstationaryJ *article $eca"se it is fiIe' in any Diel' of
(ttraction or ith a *article, also mo&ing inertially#
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
-G If another *article is tr"ly motionless, there arises the Dorce of
Inertia, hich ill ca"se it to mo&e in the same 'irection in hich the
in&estigate' *article as mo&ing# B"t this is only if the *article has the Diel'
of Re*"lsion, or if it has aroseB
2G In the e&ent that the other *article Jimmo$ileJ in a Diel' of
(ttraction, there are to *ossi$le scenarios1
aG (n in&estigate' *article ill change the 'irection of the motion
after a collision ith the JstationaryJ *articleB
$G (n in&estigate' *article force JstationaryJ *article to mo&e in the
same 'irection#
;G In the e&ent that the other *article inertially mo&es itself an' its
&elocity is greater than the &elocity of the gi&en *article hose mo&ement
e eI*lore, the in&estigate' *article starts to o$ey the ne Dorce of Inertia,
forcing it to mo&e in a ne 'irection# (n' of the last Inertial Dorce only a
higher 'egree of transformation as left# I#e# there is an a''ition of 'egrees
of transformation that increases the s*ee' of motion#
3<0 ANAL5SIS OF THE CAUSES OF UNIFORM
ACCELERATION OR OF UNIFORM DECELERATION OF
INERTIAL MOTION
5etKs on eIam*le of to sim*lest tasks sho ho an' hy inertial
motion of *articles Ain is "niformly 'ecelerate' an' of *articles Aang -
"niformly accelerate'#
1) 7ni'o"ml0 &ecele"ate& motion o' a )a"ticle Yin3
5etKs take a *article Ain ith a rate of creation of Ether eH"al to -
con&entional "nit, an' a rate of 'estr"ction eH"al to ; con&entional "nits#
5et its initial s*ee' relati&e to the ethereal fiel' is eH"al to 9
con&entional "nits#
Calculations#
?e s"$tract from 9 con&entional "nits ; con&entional "nits1 9 - ; T .#
This is amo"nt of eIternal entering into the *article Ether that is 'estroye' in
it, in its $oth hemis*heres hen it is 'is*lace' relati&e to the ethereal fiel'#
- con&entional "nit of Ether is release', - U . T C#
Initial Diel' of Re*"lsion, generating in a *article is eH"al to C
con&entional "nits, i#e# the s*ee' of inertial motion of the *article is eH"al to
C stan'ar' "nits#
Then e s"$tract ; from C con&entional "nits1 C - ; T 2 an' 2 U - T ;
con&entional "nits#
(s yo" can see, the magnit"'e of the Diel' of Re*"lsion smoothly
'ecreases from C to ; con&entional "nits, i#e# the &elocity of the *article
'ro*s to ; c#"#
>eIt1 ; - ; T ,, , U - T - con&entional "nit#
Dinally, a Diel' of Re*"lsion $ecomes eH"al to one con&entional "nit#
(n' the s*ee' is too#
- "nit cre'it is not s"fficient to f"lly meet the Jnee'J of a *article in
'estr"cti$le Ether1 - - ; T -2# ?e nee' 2 con&entional "nits yet# I#e# inertial
motion ceases, as a Diel' of (ttraction occ"rs in the rear hemis*here#
*) 7ni'o"ml0 accele"ate& motion o' a )a"ticle Yan$3
(n' no e take a *article Aang ith a rate of creation of Ether eH"al
to ; con&entional "nits, an' a rate of 'estr"ction of - con&entional "nit#
5etKs its initial s*ee' relati&e to the ethereal fiel' is one stan'ar' "nit#
Calculations#
Drom - con&entional "nit e s"$tract - con&entional "nit1 - - - T ,#
This means that the initial &elocity of the *article eH"al to one "nit f"lly
satisfies the nee' of a *article in the 'estroye' Ether# (n' not a single share
of - con&entional "nit of on Ether of the *article, hich "s"ally make "*
the nee' of a *article in the 'estroye' Ether, is cons"me'# (ll Ether create'
in a *article, all three con&entional "nits are emitte' in the form of re*"lsion
fiel' in the rear hemis*here# I#e# &elocity of the *article gra'"ally increases
from - to ; c"#
>o e s"$tract ; from -1 ; - - T 2# Drom the s*ee' eH"al to ; e
s"$tract - con&entional "nit - the rate of 'estr"ction of Ether#
Then e a'' ; to 21 2 U ; T C# This is the *article &elocity#
Then e s"$tract - from C1 C - - T .# . To . e a'' the ; con&entional
"nits1 . U ; T 9#
(n' so on3 I' inhibito"0 'o"ces &o not act on the )a"ticle, it coul& be
accele"ate& in&e'initel03
B"t in reality, this ill ne&er ha**en, $eca"se the s*ace is fille' ith
elementary *articles, an' a *article mo&ing $y inertia can colli'es ith them#
(n' $esi'es that *articles of Ain an' Aang are miIe' in the s*ace# (n'
'"ring any contact, any neigh$orhoo' of the *article Ain ith the *article
Aang, Ain takes aay Ether FenergyG of a *article Aang : i#e# re'"ces the
magnit"'e of the inertial forces ca"se the *articles to mo&e#
3=0 GENERAL INFORMATION A:OUT COLLISION OF
1ARTICLES
5etLs analy3e hy there eIists s"ch mechanical *henomenon, as a
JcollisionJ of elementary *articles#
Dirst, letLs fin' o"t hat e call the JcollisionJ#
Collision - this is the *oint of contact $eteen to *articles, at least
one of hich is certainly to this as in the *rocess of mo&ement# Directly
the strike of *articles each other - is a collision of Ethers# Ether filling
*articles an' emitte' $y them colli'es# ($o"t collision of Ether filling the
*articles, e s*eak in res*ect to the *articles Ain in the case of inertial
motion as of *articles Ain an' Aang# (s for the collision of emitte' Ether, it
refers to *articles Aang#
There are three reasons for collision of *articles1
1) An att"action o' )a"ticles>
*) A "e)ulsion o' )a"ticles>
,) An ine"tial motion o' one o" both o' the )a"ticles3
,) QRSTUQVRRVS WXQYSRQS VWRVZ Q[Q V\SQ] ^_`aQU3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------
1) Collision in the )"ocess o' att"action3
)ollision in the *rocess of attraction ill occ"r $oth if an attracte'
*article has a Diel' of (ttraction, an' in the e&ent that an attracte' *article
has a Diel' of Re*"lsion# ?hen to *articles interact ith each other Fare
attracte'G an' come closer to each other in the co"rse of this, the final
moment of their a**roach - contact - j"st $e collision Fim*actG# If an
attracte' *article has a Diel' of Re*"lsion, then ra**rochement ith an
attracting *article an' th"s their collision ill occ"r only if the Diel' of
Re*"lsion of attracte' *articles is less in mo'"l"s of the Diel' of (ttraction
of attracting *article# If the Diel' of Re*"lsion of an attracte' *article in
mo'"l"s is greater or eH"al to the Diel' of (ttraction of attracting *article an
ra**rochement Fan' im*actG of the *articles ill not ha**en#
*) Collision in the )"ocess o' "e)ulsion3
)ollision '"ring re*"lsion occ"rs in the folloing sit"ations#
%rimarily emitte' Ether meets Ether emitte' $y another *article Aang#
It is also a &ariant of collision# 4r emitte' Ether hits Ether filling the *article
Ain#
( *article ith a Diel' of Re*"lsion emits Ether an' is a'jacent to
another *article - Ain or Aang# If it is a'jacent to the *article Ain, the rate of
emission of Ether eIcee's the rate of its a$sor*tion of Ether $y the *article
Ain# In this case, $oth *articles 'i&erge, since the &ol"me of Ether emitte'
$y the *article ith the Diel' of Re*"lsion $eteen them increases# Mo&ing
aay from each other, the *articles meet on the *ath an' other *articles an'
colli'e ith them#
If the *article, hich is a'jacent to the *article ith a Diel' of
Re*"lsion is also a *article Aang, the rate of re*"lsion of the *articles is e&en
more# (n' also it 'oes not a&oi' collisions ith other *articles in the ay#
4r, for eIam*le, Aang *article is com*ose' of conglomerate of
*articles, for eIam*le, of the chemical element# There are s"ch ty*es of
chemical elements in hich on the *eri*hery '"e to the a$"n'ance of
*articles Aang there are 3ones Fan' e&en the entire s"rfaceG, hich manifests
o"tsi'e not the Diel' of (ttraction $"t Re*"lsion Diel'# So here is not e&en a
Diel' of Re*"lsion of single *article Aang on the s"rface an' a Diel' of
Re*"lsion of the gi&en 3one as *art of the conglomerate ill re*el free
*articles mo&ing *ast# Dirst, the emitte' Ether $anging in *article flying $y -
it is a &ariant of collision# (n' secon'ly, a *article ith re*elle' $y Ether
emitte' $y a conglomerate, colli'es ith the *articles, hich met on the
ay# This case is &ery common#
,) Collision in the )"ocess o' ine"tial motion3
The thir' case of collision of *articles - this is hen at least one of
them as to im*act '"ring the mo&ement# In this case, the collision - is also
the moment of contact of the *articles#
This case 'iffers significantly from the first &ariant of collision# That
collision '"ring inertial motion is the ca"se of many im*ortant for "s nat"ral
*rocesses an' *henomena# So letLs take a re&ie of the case of collision
longer#
In the real con'itions can colli'e1
-G To free *articlesB
2G ( free *article an' a *article in a conglomerate of *articles Fe#g#,
s"ch as a chemical elementGB
;G To 'ifferent *articles in conglomerates of *articles#
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
1) The collision o' two '"ee )a"ticles3
A) (oth )a"ticles we"e be'o"e collision in the )"ocess o' ine"tial
motion3
() .ne o' the )a"ticles be'o"e the collision was in a state o' ine"tial
motion, an& the secon& 4 in the Gt"ue quiescenceG3
The eI*ression Gt"ue quiescenceG means that the immo$ility of the
*article is not associate' ith hol'ing it in any Diel' of (ttraction Ffor
eIam*le, a$o"t the $o'ies on the s"rface of the *lanet e say that they are in
quiescence, as it ere, JforgettingJ that the *lanet itself is mo&ingG# Tr"e
*article in H"iescence is still j"st anyhere in the ethereal fiel'#
5etLs look at the mechanism of *article collisions on the eIam*le of
the last case, here only one *article mo&es $y inertia, hile the secon' is in
a tr"e H"iescence#
Mo&ement of free elementary *article is alays inertial# The Dorce of
Inertia makes to mo&e it $y inertia : i#e# ten'ency of Ether filling the *article
to mo&e aay from Ether emitte' $y this *article Fits rear hemis*hereG# 5et
"s remin' yo" that the *article motion relati&e to the ethereal fiel'
accom*anie' $y the transformation of the *article# ?hen the *article mo&es
$y inertia, ( Diel' of Re*"lsion m"st eIist in it, regar'less of hether this
*article has a re*"lsion fiel' o"t of the transformation *rocess# (t the same
time the front hemis*here of the *article 'oes not emit Ether : Ether of
ethereal fiel' thro"gh hich the *article mo&es *re&ents to this# Ether of
ethereal fiel' 'oes not let to go o"tsi'e the Ether, create' $y the *article,
forcing it to stay in the *article# (n' as a res"lt this Ether is "se' $y this
*article itself for the 'estr"ction#
So inertially mo&ing *article 'oes not emit Ether $y its front
hemis*here# If Ether as emitte', it co"l' interfere the *article to contact
ith the s"rface of the *article, hich met on the ay, i#e# colli'ing ith it#
(n' $eca"se the front s"rface of the inertially mo&ing *article 'oes not emit
Ether, nothing *re&ents it to colli'e ith the *articles hich occ"r in its
*ath#
Hoe&er an' here there are some restrictions, an' they are ca"se' $y
the H"ality of *articles in H"iescence on the ay#
?hen on the ay of the inertially mo&ing *article there is another
*article an' $eteen them there are no *articles, the folloing occ"rs#
In a mo&ing *article $y inertia there is an Inertial Dorce# (n' another
Dorce a''s there to this one# It is the Dorce of (ttraction if greete' on the
ay *article has a Diel' of (ttraction or the Dorce of Re*"lsion if the
*article has a Diel' of Re*"lsion# ( com*"lsory con'ition in this case is the
location of *article enco"ntere' on the same line along hich the *article
mo&es $y inertia#
1) The %o"ce o' Att"action we shoul& sum with the Ine"tial %o"ce#
This is eI*laine' $y the fact that the &ectors of $oth forces are in the same
'irection# The s*ee' of the inertial motion of a *article 'e*en's from the
Dorce of Inertia# (n' the s*ee' ith hich an attracte' *article a**roaches
the attracting 'e*en's from the Dorce of (ttraction# S"mming the forces, e
s"m an' the s*ee's# (n' as a res"lt the *article &elocity is eH"al to the s"m
of to s*ee's#
/ in3 D / '3att3 @ / sum#,
here / in# - is the s*ee' of inertial motion, / '3att3 - is the s*ee' of
ethereal flo of the Diel' of (ttraction, / sum# - is the total &elocity of the
ethereal flo#
The s)ee& o' "a))"ochement o' the ine"tiall0 movin$ )a"ticle with
the )a"ticle with the %iel& o' Att"action &e)en&s on two 'acto"sM
-G The magnit"'e of the Dorce of inertiaB
2G The magnit"'e of the Dorce of (ttraction#
The Inertial Dorce acts in this case as a constant# B"t the Dorce of
(ttraction is *ro*ortional to the Diel' of (ttraction of an enco"ntere'
*article# The more is the Diel' of (ttraction, the greater is the Dorce of
(ttraction# (n' the higher is the rate of a**roach of the inertially mo&ing
*article to the *article at H"iescence# The Dorce of Im*act 6%o"ce o'
Collision) re*resent in this case the s"m of the a$o&e to forces - the Dorce
of Inertia an' the Dorce of (ttraction# (ccor'ingly, the $"eate" is the %o"ce
o' Ine"tia an& the $"eate" is the ma$nitu&e o' the %iel& o' Att"action o'
oncomin$ )a"ticle, with $"eate" 'o"ce the movin$ )a"ticle colli&es with a
stationa"0 one3
(n' thatLs not all# (t the moment of contact FcollisionG of a mo&ing
*article ith a *article at H"iescence, ha&ing a Diel' of (ttraction, the"e is a
t"ans'e" o' a )o"tion o' Ethe" '"om the )a"ticle with the %iel& o' Re)ulsion
to the )a"ticle with the %iel& o' Att"action3
(s has $een sai', an inertially mo&ing *article has a Diel' of
Re*"lsion, i#e# emits Ether# ( *article in H"iescence ith a Diel' of
(ttraction a$sor$s Ether# ?hen a *article ith a Diel' of Re*"lsion to"ches
the s"rface of the *article ith Diel' of (ttraction, Ether, hich ha&e not
$een emitte' $efore $y the front hemis*here of the *article emitte' starts to
emit $y infl"ence of the Diel' of (ttraction of neigh$oring *article# Beca"se
the *article ith the Diel' of Re*"lsion loses Ether, there is 'ecreasing of the
amo"nt of Ether emitte' $y its rear hemis*here : i#e# the Dorce of Inertia
'ecreases# ThatLs hy in collisions of mo&ing *articles ith *articles ha&ing
Diel' of (ttraction, the s*ee' of inertial motion of the *articles gra'"ally
'ecrease ith each collision# Inci'entally, e sho"l' mention here that this
*henomenon of the transfer of Ether "n'erlies the gra'"al sloing of $o'ies
in collisions ith other $o'ies#
*) I' the )a"ticle in the )lace o' contact has %iel& o' Re)ulsion, then
it is the cause o' the %o"ce o' Re)ulsion3 (n' this Dorce of Re*"lsion
sho"l' $e s"$tracte' from the Dorce of Inertia, since the &ector of Re*"lsion
Dorce is re&erse'#
( *article ith Diel' of Re*"lsion emitting Ether increases its amo"nt
$eteen itself an' the inertially mo&ing *article, *re&enting their
ra**rochement#
If the Inertial Dorce is more in mo'"l"s than the Dorce of Re*"lsion,
their ra**rochement of the *articles ha**ens anyay an' they ill contact :
i#e# ill colli'e#
If the Inertial Dorce is eH"al in mo'"l"s than the Dorce of Re*"lsion,
ra**rochement Fan' collisionG ill not ha**en# Inertially mo&ing *article
ill like Jsli* in *laceJ# In this case the Inertial Dorce 'oes not 'isa**ear# (
*article ill mo&e thro"gh Ether emitte' $y the co"nter *article, $"t one iota
it shall not come near#
In the same case, if the Inertial Dorce is less in mo'"l"s than the
Re*"lsion Dorce, there ill $e a gra'"al 'istancing of the inertially mo&ing
*article from the co"nter *article# The s*ee' ith hich Ether ill fill the
s*ace $eteen the *articles is greater than the s*ee' of the inertial motion of
a *article# Hereith the *article ill also sa&e the state of inertial motion
thro"gh Ether emitte' $y the co"nter *article#
4.0 FORCE OF 1RESSURE OF THE 1ARTICLE SURFACE
( *article mo&ing $y inertia $eca"se it is fille' ith Ether is the ca"se
of those forces in the *articles that it meets on the ay - Dorce of %ress"re of
*article s"rface, or sim*ly - %ress"re Dorce#
Ether, filling a mo&ing *article *"shes *articles along the ay# I#e# in
Ether of the *article met on the ay there occ"rs a ten'ency to mo&e aay
from Ether filling the colli'ing *article# ?hen the *article mo&es $y inertia,
its front hemis*here emits Ether# Therefore, in the *article ith hich the
mo&ing *article colli'es, there not occ"rs a Dorce of Re*"lsion - only the
%ress"re Dorce# I#e# mo&ing *article colli'ing ith a stationary *"shes it not
$y emitte' Ether, an' its Js"rfaceJ, or, in other or's, $ Ether filling a gi&en
*article#
The magnit"'e of the %ress"re Dorce arising in the *"she' *article is
eH"al to the Dorce of Inertia, ca"sing the mo&ing inertial *article *"shing it#
>ot only taken se*arately free *articles mo&ing $y inertia may lea' to
arising in other *articles of a %ress"re Dorce# %articles in conglomerates Fon
their s"rfaceG - $oth mo&ing an' sim*ly seeking to mo&e F*ressingG - also
affect $y %ress"re Dorce#
4/0 COLLISION OF FREE 1ARTICLES MO6ING :5 INERTIA
>o letLs consi'er the case of collision of free *articles, $oth of hich
ere "* to the moment of contact '"ring the *rocess of inertial motion#
?hat ha**ens ith each of the *articles after they ha&e colli'e'@ (
&ery im*ortant role ill *lay in the ay ho the &ectors of Dorces of
%ress"re of these to *articles ill $e locate' in relation to each other# The
&ectors of the %ress"re Dorces can $e1
-G in o**osite 'irectionsB
2G 'irecte' at an angle to each other#
In or'er to 'etermine ho the res"ltant force &ector ill $e 'irecte',
e are not going to in&ent anything ne, an' t"rn to the R"le of
%arallelogram#
?hat ha**ens to the *articles in the moment of their collision@
(t the moment of collision each *article feels the effect of to forces1
-G on Inertial DorceB
2G the %ress"re Dorce ca"se' $y the secon' of the colli'ing *articles#
If yo" remem$er, e assigne' to the R"le of %arallelogram another
name - the Rule o' Subo"&ination to ominant %o"ce in &ie of action of
the less Dorce# I#e# in accor'ance ith this R"le any *article alays
increasingly s"$or'inates to the greatest largest Dorce# Hoe&er, the action
of the less Dorce also taken into acco"nt, an' acco"nte' for in accor'ance
ith the feat"res of the a''ition an' s"$traction of &ectors# If the force
&ectors lie on a same line an', of co"rse, in o**osite 'irections, from the
larger &ector e s"$tract smaller# The o$taine' 'ifference is the res"ltant
force# If the &ectors are arrange' at an angle to each other, then the 'iagonal
of the *arallelogram forme' $y the &ectors as on the si'es, j"st in'icate the
'irection an' magnit"'e of the res"ltant force# This means that for each of
to *articles e $"il' its on *arallelogram an' calc"late its on res"ltant
force# (n' after the collision each of the colli'ing *articles go in a ne
'irection an' ith a ne s*ee' FDorce in'icates s*ee'G, hich corres*on' to
the magnit"'e an' the 'irection of the res"ltant force# It 'oes not matter
'ifferent or same the *article &elocity, i#e# it is regar'less of the &al"e of their
Inertial Dorce#
In all cases hen &ectors are 'irecte' at an angle greater than -=,R, the
'irection of motion of to *articles changes after collision# If &ectors lie on
the same line, then after collision the *article ith the larger Inertial Dorce
Fan' th"s ith the lager %ress"re DorceG ill retain the former 'irection#
(ltho"gh it 'ecreases the s*ee' as of the &ector of its force ill $e 'e'"cte'
the force &ector of the secon' *article# B"t the *article ith a smaller Inertial
Dorce Fan' %ress"re DorceG changes the 'irection of its motion is re&erse'#
(s yo" can see the colli'ing *articles 'o not *ass thro"gh each other#
Mechanism of their im*act is &ery similar to collision of to thron $alls#
This is not s"r*rising, since any s*herical $o'y F$allG is constr"cte' of the
same material - of elementary *articles# %articles-$alls colli'e an' $o"nce at
an angle Fif they colli'e at an angleG#
430 COLLISION OF A FREE 1ARTICLE WITH A 1ARTICLE
IN A CHEMICAL ELEMENT
%articles 'o not lie a*art on the s"rface of a chemical element as soli'
$o'ies on the s"rface of a celestial $o'y# (n' no *articles mo&e $y /inertia0
on the s"rface of chemical element colli'ing ith *articles on its s"rface, as
it takes *lace ith 'ense $o'ies on the s"rface of the celestial $o'y#
Hoe&er, mechanism of collision of a free *article ith *articles in a
chemical element in many *oints similar to the mechanism of collision of
soli' or liH"i' $o'y falling on the s"rface of a celestial $o'y ith other
$o'ies, fiIe' on the s"rface of the *lanet#
5et any *article is at H"iescence in the 6ra&ity Diel' of a chemical
element anyhere in the com*osition of its s"rface layers# (n' at the same
time ith this *article another *article emitte' $y any element colli'es#
Pa"ticles a"e emitte& b0 the elementsM
-G after collision ith an element of a free *article or other chemical
elementB
2G "n'er infl"ence of a larger Diel' of (ttraction of another element
that Jtears offJ the *articles#
In the first case hen the *article is emitte' as a res"lt of collision its
mo&ement after the emission has an inertial character# If hereith this
inertially mo&ing *article enco"nters on the ay the 6ra&ity Diel' of some
chemical element, in a''ition to the inertia the 'ri&ing factor is the Diel' of
(ttraction of the element# In the secon' case hen the *article is emitte' $y
the action of the Diel' of (ttraction of another element, in its motion inertia
is a$sent, an' it mo&es only "n'er the infl"ence of the Diel' of (ttraction#
Trajectory of motion of an emitte' *article can either cross ith a
location of an element ith hich it colli'es or *ass this element#
In the first case hen the *article trajectory crosses ith the element
the *article mo&es $y inertia# (n' $esi'es that it is attracte' $y the 6ra&ity
Diel' of the element, an' the s*ee' ca"se' $y the emergence in the *article
of a Dorce of 6ra&itation a''s to the s*ee' of inertial motion# I#e# the Dorce
of (ttraction a''s to the Dorce of Inertia that lea's to the s"mmation of the
s*ee'# The falling of the *article is com$ine' ith the inertial motion#
In the secon' case the *article mo&es *ast the element, it mo&es $y
inertia# I#e# again e nee' to t"rn to the R"le of %arallelogram - it ill hel*
"s to calc"late the magnit"'e an' the 'irection of the res"ltant force at each
time *oint# In any case, the greater is a Dorce of Inertia o&er a Dorce of
(ttraction or less, a trajectory of a *article $ecomes c"r&e' - *ara$olic# (n'
it is 'irecte' toar' the so"rce of a Dorce of (ttraction# (n' all $eca"se the
so"rce of the Dorce of Inertia is the mo&ing *article itself# I#e# a so"rce of
Inertial Dorce is not locate' somehere at a 'istance# It is here, itLs alays
there# I#e# the *article Jt"rnsJ in the 'irection of a chemical element# B"t this
is not necessary that it falls on it# In or'er to clarify the f"rther fate of the
*article, it is necessary to a**ly the form"las of s*ace &elocities# I#e# hether
the *article ill fly $y, leaning slightly, or 'ro* on the element 'e*en's on
the &al"e of Jesca*e &elocityJ Fthe magnit"'e of Dorce of InertiaG#
(t falling on an element inertia of the motion of a *article 'oes not
'isa**ear# The 'egree of transformation remains ele&ate'# (n' the Inertial
Dorce in this case is also a''e' to the Dorce of (ttraction#
(s alrea'y mentione', a f"nction of any elementary *article is to kee*
aro"n' itself a fiIe' amo"nt of Ether# %articles themsel&es are trans*arent to
each other# Dilling them Ether makes them o*aH"e# Therefore a collision is a
contact an' a *ress"re on each other of Ether filling *articles#
--------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------
So, in the *re&io"s case hen free *articles colli'e ith each other,
they ha' to o&ercome the %ress"re Dorce of each other# ( magnit"'e of
%ress"re Dorces is ca"se' $y a magnit"'e of Dorces of Inertia of *articles#
In this case hen e talk a$o"t collision of free *articles ith a
chemical element, the Dorces that the *articles ill ha&e to o&ercome are
somehat change'#
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
Do yo" remem$er e talke' a$o"t elementary *articles $eing in the
state of H"iescence@ In case if the *article incl"'es in a chemical element it
is also in H"iescence, $"t only relati&e to the center of this chemical element#
This H"iescence, of co"rse, can not $e regar'e' as a tr"ly, $eca"se hile a
*article can $e motionless relati&e to the center of a chemical element, the
element can mo&e# So, as yo" remem$er, if a free *article colli'es ith a
*article at H"iescence, the first one starts to mo&e itho"t resistance to the
*"shing it *article# B"t if a *article is Jat H"iescenceJ is a *art of a chemical
element, it o"l' resist any *article that tries to shift it from a *lace# ?hat is
this resistance@ This "esistance is ca"se' $y an action of Diel's of (ttraction
of *articles ith s"ch fiel's as *art of the gi&en chemical element Fas ell as
in others elements of the $o'y, hich incl"'es this elementG# These Diel's
of (ttraction are the ca"se of emergence in the *article (ttraction Dorces that
act"ally kee* the *article com*ose' of the element#
Resistance o' a )a"ticle $eing in a state of H"iescence in a chemical
element is com*ose' of (ttraction Dorces ca"se' $y the action of (ttraction
Diel's of *articles ith s"ch fiel's as *art of this element# Diel's of
(ttraction of *articles locate' on the same line are s"mmari3e'# (n' s"ch
lines in the element e can 'ra many# ( total 6ra&ity Diel' of a chemical
element is alays the largest along the line *assing thro"gh the center of the
element# Ao" can name this total Diel' of (ttraction as Cent"i)etal# (ll these
s"mmary Diel's of (ttraction are the ca"se of emergence in the *article on
the s"rface of the element of Dorces of (ttraction# Es*ecially e sho"l'
highlight the Dorces of (ttraction ca"se' $y the action of (ttraction Diel's of
*articles ith s"ch fiel's in contact ith a *article at H"iescence#
In a''ition, a chemical element itself is retaine' in the com*osition of
the *lanet $y Dorces of (ttraction F$on'sG ca"se' $y the action of (ttraction
Diel's of s"rro"n'ing elements# The s"rro"n'ing elements are elements in
the $o'y, to hich this element $elongs# (lso, this is remaining elements of
the celestial $o'y, in hich this $o'y is incl"'e'#
(ll these Dorces of (ttraction hol' the gi&en *article anyhere in the
com*osition of the s"rface layers of the gi&en chemical element an' ca"se it
to resist to the *article colli'ing ith it# I#e# hen a free *article colli'es ith
a chemical element, its %ress"re Dorce o**oses the entire amo"nt of
(ttracti&e Dorces hol'ing the *article in the gi&en chemical element, an' the
chemical element in this celestial $o'y# In accor'ance ith The Rule o'
Subo"&ination to ominant %o"ce a *article can o$ey the %ress"re Dorce of
a *"shing *article only if the %ress"re Dorce is more than all total Dorces of
(ttraction hol'ing the *articles in the element# This is im*ossi$le# That is
hy a *article in a chemical element 'oes not start to mo&e in the same
'irection that colli'ing ith it a free *article# Instea', a '"ee )a"ticle in the
time o' collision sto)s3 Its ine"tial motion in the last &i"ection 6i' it is
be'o"e movin$ ine"tiall0) sto)s3
There are &ario"s o*tions for f"rther 'e&elo*ments occ"rre' after the
collision of the *articles - $oth for the *article fallen to an element, an' to
the JstationaryJ ithin the s"rface of the *article# Each *article can either
remain as a *art of the element : abso"be& $y it or lea&e it : to be emitte&#
440 THE TALK A:OUT INTERCON6ERSION OF MASS AND
ENERG5
(ny scientist is a *erson, a *art of o"r *lanet# E&eryone can ha&e an
access to all that 'i&ersity of i'eas, eIisting in the form of elementary
*articles of 'ifferent *lans - free an' in the form of conglomerates# GI&eas
a"e in the ai"G - is not fig"rati&e eI*ressions, an' literal# Most of the i'eas
oning $y h"man min's are really orn in the EarthLs atmos*here# These
i'eas are information, all kin's of $eha&ior *rograms, algorithms, or sim*ly
action images that tell "s something# These Ji'easJ are orn not only in the
air# They also *enetrate 'ense an' liH"i' $o'ies an' en&ironment# Hoe&er,
in a gaseo"s en&ironment there are them more of all#
4$&io"sly, the scientists, the creators of H"ant"m mechanics -
Einstein, Planc8, an& (oh" - ere infl"ence' $y the i'ea of $eing in the
"ni&erse confrontation $eteen to main *rinci*les - Matter an' S*irit, Ain
an' Aang# %ro$a$ly this infl"ence o&er can eI*lain the 'amous )ostulate o'
quantum mechanics &ecla"in$ the )ossibilit0 o' inte"conve"sion o' mass
an& ene"$0# 4f co"rse, the conce*ts of H"ant"m mechanics can $e critici3e'
an' many of them to ref"te# In one ay or another e ill 'o it#
5etLs talk a$o"t the fact that e are satisfie' ith the a$o&e *ost"late
of intercon&ersion an' hat 'oes not an' hy#
In o"r $ook it claims that energy is a synonymo"s ith S*irit, the
secon' as*ect of 6o'# Hoe&er, any *article FSo"lG is a "nion of Matter an'
S*irit# St"'ying H"ant"m mechanics e can easily see that its c"eato"s
cont"aste& the mass an& ene"$0 in the same wa0 as in the occultism +atte"
an& S)i"it a"e o))ose&# Energy from the stan'*oint of science : is a arm,
light, electromagnetic or ra'ioacti&e ra'iation# Mass is chemical elements
an' all of them is# Mass is that ra'iates energy#
EH"ate energy on the one han' an' the *ro'"ct of mass an' &elocity
of the other, Einstein essentially in&ente' nothing ne# (n' earlier, in
classical mechanics there are at least three form"las 'escri$ing the
'e*en'ence of energy from mass1
T @ mO C B * 68inetic ene"$0)>
) @ mO 6im)ulse)>
% @ mO B t 6%o"ce)3
( ne as an a**lication of the las of classical mechanics Fcreate'
for macrosco*ic o$jectsG in res*ect to micro-o$jects# (n' the no&elty
containe' in the statement is that mass Fchemical elements, s"$stanceG can
$e con&erte' into energy an' e&a*orate# That is, in re*resentation of
H"ant"m mechanics there is something like mass e&a*oration#
S"rely the fo"n'ers of H"ant"m mechanics are &ery *lease' an'
ins*ire' $y the i'ea that they can shake or e&en 'estroy one of the
J"nto"cha$lesJ conser&ation las - the 5a of )onser&ation of Mass that
arg"e' that the matter 'oes not arise o"t of nothing an' 'oes not 'isa**ear#
In some ays of co"rse, they ere right# The &ery *rocess of heating
chemical elements is a *rocess of transformation, i#e# a changing of the
H"ality of *articles that make "* these elements# Heating of a *article : it is
really JMatter, ascen'e' to Hea&enJ, Matter, changing its H"ality an' t"rning
into S*irit# If yo" remem$er, in the transformation *rocess of *articles Ain
often in the rear hemis*here a Diel' of Re*"lsion a**ears# (n' in Aan
*articles the Diel' of Re*"lsion increases# This *rocess is calle' in occ"ltism
as JMatter (scension to Hea&enJ, JIgnition of 5ightsJ an' JRising of
!"n'aliniJ#
Mass in science is a sym$ol of Matter# Energy is a sym$ol of S*irit#
So, as yo" can see, H"ant"m mechanics remotely gras*e' an eIistence of the
5a of Transformation# M"ality of *articles is ca*a$le to change : Mass is
a$le to ascen' to the state of Energy an' comes $ack#
Hoe&er e *artially attri$"te' to H"ant"m mechanics hat it has
not# Aet "n'er the intercon&ersion of mass an' energy H"ant"m mechanics
"n'erstoo' com*letely 'ifferent, 'istinct from o"r *erce*tions# Mass in their
"n'erstan'ing - it is rather an amo"nt of s"$stance# (n' its &al"e may
increase or 'ecrease 'e*en'ing on hether it a$sor$s or emits that hat is
calle' Energy#
Energy in H"ant"m mechanics in contrast to mass - is something
immaterial# Des*ite the fact that JH"ant"m scientistsJ $elie&e that energy is
emitte' an' a$sor$e' $y H"anta, J*ortionsJ, yet in their &ie this energy
after emission or a$sor*tion is scattere', s*rea' o"t like a 'ro* in the ocean#
I#e# in H"ant"m mechanics, H"ant"m of energy eIists only in moments of
emission an' a$sor*tion# The rest time all energy is one# In this res*ect,
H"ant"m mechanics is in soli'arity ith the a&e theory of H"ygens#
Hoe&er, this is misconce*tions# M"anta of energy are fore&er# They eIist as
long as there is this "ni&erse, "ntil the occ"rrence of Maha*ralaya# M"anta of
energy are elementary *articles that make "* e&erything incl"'ing all
chemical elements# Emission an& abso")tion o' ene"$0 b0 batomc - it is
nothing like the emission an' a$sor*tion of elementary *articles#
?ith regar' to the mass conser&ation la the *artic"lar "n'erstan'ing
of its meaning - it is a &ery contro&ersial iss"e# (ll the matter is that there is
not only mass, $"t also antimass# >ot only gra&ity is $"t re*"lsion# (n' in
the la of mass conser&ation these facts 'o not co"nt#
?hen it is allege' that in the co"rse of chemical reactions, the total
mass of initial an' final com*onents of the reaction 'oes not change itLs not
H"ite right# Here those solar elementary *articles are not co"nte' that
acc"m"late on the s"rface of chemical elements# In the co"rse of chemical
reactions, there is a re'istri$"tion of the s"rface *articles# Dorce fiel's of the
same ty*es of chemical elements in 'ifferent com*o"n's are of &arying
H"ality# In some com*o"n's, an element acts as a re'"cing agent - Ain# In
the other it is as the oIi'ant - Aang# (n' all is $eca"se of the re'istri$"tion
of *articles on the s"rface# (ltho"gh, in general, an o&erall H"alitati&e an'
H"antitati&e com*osition of each element remains "nchange'# The
com*osition of the s"rface layer only changes# The n"m$er of solar *articles
arri&es or 'ecreases# The n"m$er of those *articles that ere a *art of
elements originally, is *ractically "nchange'# (n' ho many *articles Ain
FmassG an' *article Aang FantimassG ere, an' remain so# Hoe&er, the more
eI*os"re of the s"rface layers can either strengthen or eaken a mass of any
element, i#e# the Diel' of (ttraction &al"e in areas here the fiel' of s"ch
H"ality a**ears#
So, as yo" can see, the 5a of )onser&ation of Mass nee's to $e
a'j"ste'#
%erha*s the creators of H"ant"m mechanics in general sho"l' not
attract this la as an arg"ment an' "se it to *ro&e that mass 'isa**ears as
energy#
The only thing that yo" can imagine1 at a time hen H"ant"m
mechanics arises, it as s"ch nonsense - the assertion that atoms Fchemical
elementsG are not in'i&isi$le entities an' may consist of H"anta of energy#
So, as yo" can see, this iss"e is far from to $e consi'ere' easy in
attainment# B"t here e are talking not a$o"t the ease or 'iffic"lty
"n'erstan'ing hat *rocesses occ"r in chemical elements an' ho they
a$sor$ an' emit the elementary *articles# >ot at all# ?e are talking a$o"t the
com*leIity of "n'erstan'ing hat sense as in&este' in their assertions $y
the creators of H"ant"m mechanics# B"t let a *ri&ate mis"n'erstan'ing not
ham*er the *rocess of o"r general knole'ge# %hysics of the early tentieth
cent"ry - is a history# 5etKs take o"t all the most &al"a$le of it, the rest
s"rren'er into the han's of historians of science#
4ne $ecomes a**arent hen st"'ying H"ant"m mechanics# >ot
acci'entally *hysics a''icting it, feels to its *ost"lates attit"'e similar to
religio"s ae# This $ranch of science as ell as relati&istic mechanics an'
n"clear *hysics *erfectly enhances a h"man conscio"sness#
XYZ[ \]^Z[_`]\a [bc_`YZde fg` `hVbcZ`` i_^Z][_[j eck^Z`i`#
lc \mVb^jZ[ n`h`i`, V_mci^op`c\a co, `\fd]d_^o] i cc f[\]Vm^]^e
[]Z[qcZ`c, \k[YZ[c \ gcm`r`[hZde ]gcfc][e# s][] g^hYcm Z^Vi` ]^i tc,
i^i ` gcma]`_`\]\i^a eck^Z`i^, ` aYcgZ^a n`h`i^ Zce^m[ \f[\[u\]_Vc]
g^\q`gcZ`o bcm[_cbc\i[r[ \[hZ^Z`a#
Thank yo" for yo"r attentionO
(nother $ook of the series /The Teaching of Djhal !h"l : Esoteric
>at"ral Science0 & 'The (ain occ!$ aw# an) conce*$#+ &
htt*122#ama3on#com2Main-4cc"lt-5as-)once*ts-
e$ook2'*2B,,6788R92
( fragment from the $ook /New E#o$e%ic A#$%oog,0 yo" can rea'
here : htt*122r"#scri$'#com2'oc22,9;<9.=22Tatiana-Danina-The-Doctrine-of-
Djhal-!h"l->e-Esoteric-(strology
4ther $ooks of this series are *re*aring in English#