Contract I

KAMKUS COLLEGE OF LAW ( BHAGIRATH GROUP OF INSTITUTIONS) (Affiliated to CCS University, Meerut & Approved by Bar council of India,
New Delhi
(An e-initiative by KCL)
NOTES ON
Code
102
Subject
Contract-I
Course
II LL.B. 1st Yr
Class
Note : Only KCL students are authorized to download the notes
KAMKUS COLLEGE OF LAW ( BHAGIRATH GROUP OF INSTITUTIONS) (Affiliated to CCS University, Meerut & Approved by Bar council of India, New Delhi
Contract 1st ( LL.B. Ist Year )

Q.1 Define a contract, what are the essentials of a valid contract. - all Contract are Agreement, but all agreement are not contract Discuss. Ans. Definition of Contract :(i) According to Anson A contract is an Agreement enforceable by law made between two or more persons by which rights are acquired by one or more to acts or forbearances on the part of the other or others. (ii) According to Salmond Contract is an Agreement, creating and defining obligations between the parties (iii) According to Sec.2 (h) of Contract Act An Agreement enforceable by law is a contract. Essentials of a valid Contract :- The essentials of a valid Section 10 of the Indian Contract act. Which says Sec.10 Which agreement are Contracts All Agreements are Contracts if they are made by the free consent of Parties, Competent to Contract, for a lawfull consideration and with a lawful object, and are not hereby expressly declared to be void. So the essentials for a valid contract are as follows :1. More than one party. 2. An Agreement Between the parties 3. Free consent of parties. 4. Parties Should be Competent to contract. 5. Consideration should be lawful. 6. The object of contract should be lawful. 7. Such contract should not be declared void. Contract Sec-2 (h) According to Sec 2 (h). Contract is an Agreement which is enforceable by law. In order that an agreement becomes a contract it has to satisfy all the essentials of a valid contract as mentioned in Sec-10. 1. There must be an Agreement The first and foremost essential of a valid contract is that there must be an Agreement, According to Sec-2(e) Every Promise and every set of promises, forming the
2
Contract are inherent in the
consideration for each other is an Agreement The Agreement consists of two Basic elemen ts (1) Proposal (Offer), (2) Acceptance (1) Proposal A proposal and its acceptance is the universally acknowledged process for the making of an agreement. The Proposal is the starting point, Sec-2 (a) defines Proposal as When one person signifies to another his willingness to do or to abstain from doing anything, with a view to obtaining the assent of that other to such act or abstinence, he is said to make a proposal. (ii) Acceptance Sec-2 (b) When the person to whom the Proposal is made signifies his assent thereto, the proposal is said to be accepted. A proposal when accepted becomes a promise. (2) The Agreement must be made by Competent parties :- A contract is valid only if it has been made by the parties who are competent to make it. See 11 of the act. The following persons are competent to enter into a contract i) ii) iii) Who are Major Who are of sound mind Who are not disqualified from contracting by any law to which they are subject.
Thus, according to Sec-11 of the act, any person who is a minor or is of unsound mind or has been declared disqualified by any law is not competent to enter into a contract and if an Agreement is made by any of such persons, it is void.
(3) Agreement must be made by the free Consent of parties :- Another requirement for a valid contract is that the Agreement must have been made with the free consent of the parties, if consent is not free, the contract becomes voidable In Mikol Bottlers Ltd. Vs. M/S Dhillon Kool Drinks, AIR 1995, the Delhi High Court held that an Agreement to be valid should be made by free consent of the parties apart from other requirement. (4) The Agreement must be made for lawful consideration :- To constitute a valid contract, it is essential that agreement is made for a lawful consideration. According to Sec-23 of the Act, if the Agreement is not for a lawful consideration the agreement is void. Additional District judge AIR 1994 ALL 299 (5) The agreement must be made for lawful object :The object of the Agreement must be lawful otherwise the Agreement becomes void and an important element of a valid contract is that the Agreement is made for a lawful object Sec-23
3
In Nutan Kumar vs. IInd.
(6) The agreement must not have been declared to be void by contract Act or any other Act another important element for a valid contract is that the agreement should not be from amongst, such agreement which have been specifically declared void as per Sec-26, 27, 28, 29, 30 and 56 of the Act. Q.2 Define Proposal and explain their essentials and discuss the kinds of offer.
Ans. Proposal Sec 2 (a) When one person signifies to another, his willingness to do or to abstain from doing anything. With a view to obtaining the assent or that other to such act or abstinence, he is said to make a proposal. these are some essentials of a offer 1. Communication of offer is Necessary (Sec.4) The Communication of a Proposal is complete when it comes to the knowledge of the person to whom it is made, It is to be remembered that there is no offer till it is communicated to the offeree as otherwise he cannot accept it, being completely unaware of it, it is, therefore Necessary that a person must have knowledge of the offer at the time of its acceptance, doing anything in ignorance of the offer can never be treated as its acceptance. In Lalman Shukal vs. Gauri Dutt (1913) A.L.J. 489 In this case the plaintiff Lalman Shukla, was serving as a munim in the firm of defendant Gauri dutt. The Nephew of Gauri Dutt ran away from his house and no trace of him was found for some time. defendant On 21 st Jan.1912
sent the plaintiff to Hardwar for tracing the boy and paid him his travelling
expenses. After sending the plaintiff to Hardwar the defendant by hand bills advertised that a reward of Rs.501 would be paid to any one who would find the boy. The plaintiff had no knowledge of the reward advertised, he found the bay at Rishikesh and brought him back on 25th of Jan.1912. The plaintiff filed a suit for the recovery of the reward advertised, it was held that since the plaintiff was ignorant of the offer of reward his act of bringing the last boy did not amount to the acceptance of the offer and therefore, he was not entitled to claim the reward. 2. Intention to create legal relationship It is necessary that the offer should be made with an intention to create legal relationship, Promise in the case of social engagements is generally without an intention to create legal relationship, such an agreement can not be considered to
4
be a contract, so an agreement to go for a walk, to go to a movie, to play same game or entertain another person with a dinner cannot be enforced in a court of law. In Balfour v. Balfour :- An intention not to create legal relationship was implied. It was held that in this case, there being no intention to create legal relationship, the husband was not liable. 3. Offer must be certain :- An offer must be certain and definite Its terms should not be so vague so as to prevent a contract being formed. Example (i) A Agree to sell to B a Hundred tons of oil. There is nothing whatever to show as to what kind of oil was intended, hence the agreement is void for uncertainly. (ii) A agree to sell B My white horse for five hundred rupees or one thousand. The agreement will be void because there is nothing to show which at the two prices was to be given. Kinds of offer (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) Q.3 Cross offer Counter offer Specific and General offer Standing offer Offer and invitation of offer Offer may be express or implied Offer may be positive or negative Offer may be conditional or unconditional.
Define the acceptance. Explain its legal rules with the help of decided cases. the proposal is said to be accepted, A proposal when accepted, become a promise. A person , when accepted results in an agreement, after the acceptance of the proposal a contract between two parties can arise.
Ans. Sec-2 (b) When the person to whom the proposal is made signifies his assent thereto,
Effect of Acceptance A contract is created only after an offer is accepted. Anson. Explained the effect of acceptance as Acceptance is to an offer what alighted is to a train of Gunpowder.
Essentials of a Valid Acceptance I Acceptance should be Communicated:-It means that the offree must signify his assent or communicate the acceptance. The communication of acceptance is deemed to be made by any act or omission of the party accepting, by which he intends to communicate such acceptance Sec 3. Communication may be oral, by post, by telegram, by a massage on phone, through a messenger or in any other reasonable manner, sometimes the conduct of a person might indicate his assent e.g. a passenger travels in bus. Felt house V. Bindley it was held that since the nephew had not communicated the acceptance to Felt House, no contract had arisen in this case and therefore felt house had not become the owner of the horse, [ this is absence of acceptance,] 2. Acceptance may be express or implied :- An acceptance of an offer may be express or implied, Where an offer is accepted by words, written or oral, the acceptance is called express. When an offer is accepted by conduct, the acceptance is called implied. In Carlill Vs. Cabrolic Snake Ball Co.(1893) 3. Acceptance must be absolute and unqualified :- The first and foremost essential of a valid acceptance is that it must be absolute and unconditional. In this regard Sec-7 says that in order to convert a proposal into a promise the acceptance must be absolute and unqualified.
6
In Hyde vs. Wrench (1840) 3 Beav.334 the defendant offered to sell his farm to the plaintiff for 1000 only. But the plaintiff said he would buy it for 950 only . Later on he agreed to buy the farm for 1000. But then the defendant refused to sell the farm. The plaintiff sued the defendant for specific performance of contract. The court dismissed his suit by holding that no contract is made because the plaintiffs offer for 950 was in fact a counter offer which destroyed the original offer. 4. Communication of acceptance must be made by the acceptor or his authorized agent A communication of acceptance to be made valid, must be either by the offeree himself or his authorized agent. A communication of acceptance by any other person will not be valid. In Powell Vs. Lee 5. The acceptance must be expressed in some usual and reasonable manner :Sec-7 the acceptance must be expressed in some usual and reasonable manner. Unless the proposal prescribes the manner in which it is to be accepted, If the proposal prescribes a manner in which it is to be accepted and the acceptance is not made in such manner the proposer may, within a reasonable time after the acceptance is communicated to him, insist that his proposal shall be accepted in the prescribed manner, and not otherwise If he fails to do so, he accepts the acceptance. for example :- A offers to B to sell his watch for Rs. 100/B may accept this offer orally or by writing a letter or by sending a telegram. But if A says in his offer that acceptance is to be communicated only by a telegram then B should accept it by sending a telegram, if B sends a post card for acceptance. A can object to it and insist that his offer shall be accepted only by a telegram, but if A does not insist upon it, he accepts the acceptance as actually communicated.
6.
Acceptance should be made while the offer is still subsisting :It has already been Noted that the offeror is free to withdraw the offer or the offer is revoked under various circumstances mentioned in Sec-6. After the offer has been withdrawn or has lapsed, there is nothing which can be accepted it is therefore necessary that the acceptance should be made while the offer is still alive and subsisting. Acceptance of the offer is deemed to have ended by rejection of the original offer or a counter offer. In such a case also, once the offer has lapsed, an attempt to accept the same would not give rise to any legal obligation.
Q.4
What is consideration and define the Present, Past, Future Consideration?
Ans. Definition of Consideration the term consideration has been defined by different jurists in a different manner as follows. According to Blackstone :- Consideration is the recompense given by the party contracting to the other According to Pollock :- Consideration is the Price for which the promise of the other is bought and the promise thus given for value is enforceable Thus, consideration is the price for the promise. The definition of consideration as a Price of the Promise has been commended by Cheshire and Fifoat. According to them it is easier to understand it corresponds mere happily to the normal exchange of promises and it emphasizes the commercial character of the English contract. According to Sec-2 (d)When, at the desire of the Promiser, the promisee or any other person has done or abstained from doing, or does or abstains from doing, or promises to do or to abstain from doing, something. Such act or abstinence or promise is called a consideration for the promise.
Meaning of Consideration :- In the ordinary course, when a person makes a promise to another, he does so with the intention to desire some advantage
8
which the person to whom the proposal is made is capable of conferring upon him. At the desire of the promisor, the promise or any other person has either. (i) (ii) (iii) Done something or abstained from doing something. Does or abstains from doing something Promises to do or to abstain from doing something, this act which is done or promised to be done is known as consideration.
Nature of Consideration :- Consideration is an important requisite at a contract. An analysis of any contract will show that it consists of two clearly separable parts (i) (ii) Promise on the one hand Consideration for the promise on the other hand,
A person who makes a promise to do or refrain from doing something as a legal duty usually does so as a return or equivalent of some benefit according to him or as a return or equivalent of some class damage or in convenience that may occasion, or may have been occasioned, to the other party in respect of the promise. The benefit so received or the loss damage or inconvenience so caused is regarded in law as consideration of the promise, it may be described as something accepted or agreed upon as a return or equivalent for the promise made. Definition of Consideration Analysed :- Sec-2 (d)
(1) At the desire of the Promisar The Act or forbearance must be at the desire of the promisar it is to be remembered that the act or forbearance must be done at the desire of
the promisar , if it is done at the instance of a third party, or without the desire of the promisare, it is no consideration Durga Prasad Vs. Baldeo (1880) 3 All 221. (2) The Promisee or any other person it is a well-settled rule of English Law that consideration must move from the promisee alone. It means that the act or abstinence or promise constituting the consideration must be done suffered or made by the promise himself and at the request of the promisor. Chinnaya Vs. Ramaya (1882) 4 Mad 137 Yamuna Das Vs. Rani Auttar (1911) 30 In this case A mortgages his property to B and B promises to pay A, debt to C, C cannot file a suit against B to enforce Bs promises C, is not a party to the Contract between A and B. (3) Consideration may consist of an act or abstinence :Consideration may consist of a positive act or an abstinence, i.e. e Negative act. Thus, an agreement between A and B under which A promises not to file suit against B for another two years in consideration of B promising to raise the rote of interest from 60% to 90% is a good contract. As abstinence being the consideration for Bs promise. (4) Consideration is three types :(i) (ii) (iii) Past Consideration (has done or abstained from doing) Present Consideration (does or abstains from doing) Future Consideration (Promises to do or to abstain from doing
(i) Past Consideration It means that the consideration for any promise was given earlier and the promise is made thereafter. Example A requests to B to find his lost dog. After B have done the same, if A promise to pay B Rs. 100 for that it is past consideration. A finds Bs purse and gives it to him, B promise to pay A Rs.50. This is a contract Present or executed Consideration When one of the parties to the contact has
(ii)
performed his part of the promise which constitutes the consideration for the promise by the other sides it is knows as executed consideration for example, A makes an offer of reward of Rs.100 to any one finds his lost dog and brings the same to him. B finds the lost dog and brings the same to him. B finds the last dog and delivers the same to A. When B does so,
10
that amounts to both the acceptance of the offer which results in a binding contract under which A is bound to pay Rs.100 to B and also simultaneously giving consideration for the contract. The consideration in this present. (iii) Future or Executory - When one person makes a promise in exchange for the
promise by the other side, the performance of the obligation by each side, to be made subsequent to the making of the contract, the consideration is know as executor, for example A agrees to supply certain goods to B and B agrees to pay for them on a future date, this is a case of executory consideration. Difference between English and Indian law of Consideration (ii) English Law 1. Under English Law past Consideration is no consideration - Indian Law 1. But Indian law past consideration is a good consideration.
2. English Law consideration should move from the promise and Promise alone and not from a Third person
2. But under the Indian law consideration can move either from the promise or any other person but it must proceed at the desire of the Promisor.
3. In English Law real consideration is necessary Q.5
3. Consideration need not be
adequate of Indian
Define An Agreement Made without Consideration is Void
Ans. An Agreement made without consideration is void Section-25 of the Indian Contract Act declares the General rule that an Agreement made without consideration is void. Section,10 also says that an Agreement becomes a Contract only when there is some lawful Consideration for it. Thus the Cumulative effect of these two Sections is that every Agreement must be Supported by Consideration. Exceptions to the General Rule
11
Natural love and affection-Section25 (1) says that an agreement made without Consideration is that Void. Promise to Compensate for something done Voluntarity.Section25 (2). Promise to pay a time barred dept-Section25 (3). No Consideration is Necessary to Completed Gifts. No Consideration is necessary to dispenses with or remit the performance of Contract Wholly or in part. No Consideration is Necessary to extend the time for the performance of Contract. No Consideration is necessary to accept any satisfaction instead of the whole claim. No Consideration is necessary for the Gratuitous bailments. No Consideration is necessary to create on agency.
Natural lone and affection- Section.25 says that an Agreement made without Consideration is not Void. Provided it is expressed in writing and registered under the law for the time being in force for the Registration of documents and is made on account of natural lone and affection between parties standing in a near relation to each other. Example- A for Natural lone and affection Promise to give his son B Rs. 1000.A puts his promise to B into writing and registers it, this will be a valid. Contract even when made without Consideration. Promise to Compensate for something done voluntarily.Section.25 (2 ) an Agreement made without Consideration is not void, provided, it is a promise to Compensate wholly or in part, a person who has already voluntarily done something for the Promisor or something which the Promisor was legally Compellable to do. Example- A finds Bs purse and give it to him B promise to pay A Rs.50. This promise can be enforced similarly, if A has supported Bs son and Subsequently B Promises to Pay As expenses in so doing. A is entitled to sue and get the said Promise enforced. Promise to Pay a time-barred dept- Section25 (3) says that an Agreement made without Consideration is not void. Provided - it is a Promise made in Writing and signed by the person to be charged there with, or by his agent generally or specially authorized in that behalf - to
12
Pay Wholly or in part a dept which the creditor might have enforced payment but for the law for the limitation of suits. Example- A owes B Rs 1000 but the dept is barred by the Limitation Act. A signs a written Promise to pay B Rs.500 an account of the dept. This will be a valid contract and shall not be Void for want of Consideration.
No Consideration is Necessary to completed gifts -Section.25 Provides that as between the donor and the donee any Gift actually made will be valid through there be no registered deed. Nearness of relationship or natural love. In order to bring into operation this explanation the gift must be completed. Thus if a person gives a gift of certain properties to another according to the Provisions of the Transfer of Property Act, he cannot Subsequently demand the Property back on the ground of want of Consideration. Because Gift is Complete.
No Consideration is necessary to dispense with or remit the performance of contract Wholly or in part- Sec.63 provides in the first place that every Promisee may dispense with or remit, Wholly or in part, the performance of the Promise made to him for exampleA Promises to paint a picture for B.B afterwards for bids him to do so. A is no longer bound to perform the Promise.
No Consideration is Necessary to extend the time for the Performance of ContractSection. 63 Provides in the second place that every Promisee may extend the time for the Performance of contract without requiring any Consideration to support such an Agreement. No Consideration is Necessary to accept any Satisfaction instead of the whole claimSec.63 provides in the third Place that every Promise may accept any Satisfaction which he thin fit instead of the whole claim under the contract for example- A owes b 5,000 rupees. A pays to B 1,000 rupees and B accepts them in satisfaction of his whole claim on A. This payment is a discharge of the whole claim. In Kapoor Chand Godha Vs. Mir Nawab Himayat Ali Khan, A.I.R (1963) S.C.250-in this Case the debtor offered Rs.20 Lakhs to the creditor in full Satisfaction of a liability of Rs.27 Lakhs. The creditor accepted it. Subsequently , the creditor Sued the debtor for the balance. The Court held that the Case was completely covered by illustration (e) to Section.63 and the
13
creditor having accepted 20 Lakhs in full Satisfaction of his claim of Rs.27 Lakhs was not entitled to sue to recover the Balance.
No Consideration is Necessary for the Gratuitous bailments Bailments may be divided into three kinds- i.e. Bailments for the Benefit of the Bailer. Bailment for the Benefit of the Bailee. Bailment for the Natural benefit of both, the bailer and bailee. A bailment for the benefit of the bailee is called the Gratuitous Baliment. A gratuitous bailment is one in which a loan of article is made without any charge, detriment or Consideration. The Gratuitous Bailment is bost exemplified by a loan of some article. Thus, A example- A barrous Bs scooter to use for a day . the bailment is one for the sole benefit of A even if no Consideration is paid.
No Consideration is Necessary to create an Agency- Lastly, S. 185 Provides that no Consideration is necessary to create a contract of an agency .Generally an agent is remunerated by way of Commission for Services rendered but no Consideration is immediately necessary at the of the Appointment. Minors are incapable of entering into a valid Contract discuss.
Q.6
Ans. Sec 11 says that Every person is competent to contract who is of the age of majority according to the law to which he is subject, and who is of sound mind and is not disqualified from Contracting by any law to which he is subject Thus, the Section declares the following persons to be in competent to contract. Minors Person of Unsound Mind, Person disqualified by law to which they are subject. Who is a Minor ? According to the Indian Majority Act, 1875, A Minor is one who has not completed 18 year of age, But in the case of Minors of whose person or property (or both) a Guardian is appointed by Court of wards, the Minority continues up to the age of twenty o ne.
14
Indian Contract Act, Majority of the contracting parties is a necessary element for the validity of the contracts. Nature of Minors Agreement Section 10 requires that the parties to a contract must be competent. Sec 11 declared that a Minor is not competent. But neither Sec. makes it clear as to whether, if a Minor enters into an Agreement, would it be vaidable at his option or altogether vaid? These Provisions had, therefore, quite naturally given rise to a controversy, about the nature of a minors Agreement. This controversy was finally settled in 1903 by the Privy Council in Mohari Bibi Vs. Dharmodas Ghose, Where in Sir Lord North observed Looking at Sec. 11 their lordships are satisfied that the Act makes it essential that are
contracting parties should be competent to contract and expressly provides that a person who by reason of infancy is incompetent to contract cannot make a contract within the meaning of the Act. The question whether a contract is void or voidable presupposes the existence of a contract within the meaning of the Act, and cannot arise in the case of an infant Ever since this decision has not been doubted that a Minors Agreement is absolutely void. Effects of Minors Agreement Minors Contract cannot be specifically enforced Since a Minors contract is absolutely void, there can be no specific performance of such a contract. Even when a contract has been entered into by a Guardian of behalf of a Minor, there can be no specific performance by or against Minor, so it was held that by the Privy Council in Mr. In Sarwarjan Vs. Fakruddin that a Guardian has no power to bind a Minor by a contract for purchase of immovable property and the Minor by a contract for purchase of immovable property, and the minor cannot enforce the contract as there was no mutuality. In such a case even the Minor cannot enforce specific performance, as there is no mutuality. Minor is not liable to refund the money Gained by fraudulent misrepresentation As it is finally decided by the Privy Council, in the leading case of Mohari Bibi Vs. Dharmodas Ghose (1903)30 Cal.539 P.C. that a Minors contract is void, and not merely voidable. An in fart is, therefore, under no liability to repay the money that he has received under such a contract even if he has falsely represented that he has attained the age of majority. Minors Contract Cannot be ratified Since a Minors contract is void it follows that there can be no question of ratifying it, and hence a promise by a person on attaining majority to
15
repay money lent and advanced to him during minority cannot be enforced as the consideration given during minority is no consideration at all. Transfer in favour of a Minor is enforceable There is nothing in contract Act which prevents a Minor from being a promise or transferee. The law does not regard a minor as incapable of accepting a Benefit, it has been held by a full bench of the Madras High Court held that a mortgage executed in favour of a Minor who has advanced the mortgage money is enforceable by him or by any other person on his behalf. So also, where a Minor purchaser of immovable property was subsequent to his purchase, dispossessed by a third party, it was held that the minor could recover from his vendor the sum which he had paid as purchase money, on the same Principle, it has been held by the High Court of Rangoon and Madras, that a promissory note executed in favour of a Minor is not void and can be enforced by the Minor. Estoppel has no effect upon Minors Contract Formerly, there were many conflicting decisions as to whether a Minor would be liable if he had made false representation as to his age, i.e. if he had falsely told to other party to the contract that he had attained, the age of majority. However, now the controversy has been set at rest by the decision of the Privity Council in Sadiq Ali Khan Vs. Jai Kishare , Where it was observed that a deed executed by a minor is a nullity, and that, therefore, there cannot be any estoppel against a statute. for example In R.LesLie Ltd Vs. Shesli (1914) 3 K.B.607 the defendant, who was an infant, induced the plaintiff to lend him 400 by falsely representing that he was of full age. The plaintiff sued the infant to recover the money on the Ground, (1) of fraud (1) alternatively for money had and received, it was held that the infants relief Act made the contract absolutely void and to give the plaintiff relief on either of these two grounds would be an indirect way of enforcing a void contract, and consequently the Action failed.
Q.7
Define the Coercion and undue influence and difference between coercion and undue influence or fraud and misrepresentation or wagering and contingent contract. Coercion Indian Contract Act 1872 (Sec-15) Coercion is the committing or threatening to commit. Any act forbidden by the I.P.C., or the unlawful detaining or threatening to detain. Any Property to the prejudice of any person
16
Ans.
whatever, with the intention of causing any person to enter into an agreement. Example A threaten to shoot, B if he does not let -out his house to him. B agrees to toles his house to A. The consent of A has been induced by coercion. Essential Elements of Coercion. (1) Act Forbidden Indian Code 1860 When the consent of a party to the contract is obtained either by the committing or by threating to commit any act which is forbidden by the I.P.C. the consent is said to be obtained by coercion. Example A on pistol paint makes B Agree to sell his scooter for Rs.1000. B did so. The consent so obtained amounts to coercion. (2) Unlawful detaining of property When the consent is obtained by unlawful detaining of any property, the consent is said to be caused by coercion. (3) Intention of causing any person to enter into an Agreement To prove coercion. It is not sufficient that the committing of or the threatening to commit a forbidden act is existent, but it is also to be established that the committing or the threat of such a forbidden act was effectively used with the intention of compelling any person to enter into an agreement. Example A gave beating to B to take revenge for his insult. The beating does not amount to coercion as the intention of beating was not to cause him to enter into a contract. (4) Coercion by whom and against whom Coercion, threat may proceed from anybody. Even from a person who is not a party to the agreement. The act of coercion may be directed against the promisor himself or against any other person in whose welfare the promisor is interested. Example A and B are negotiating to enter into a contract but A is unwilling at the moment. X third person Y threatens to assault A if he does not enter into the contract with B. However, B does not know about all this. A out of fear enters into a contract with B. Here the consent has been caused by coercion. (5) Application of the Penal Code as to the Place not necessary An act to amount to coercion must be such as has forbidden by the I.P.C. However it is immaterial whether the Penal Code is or is not in force at the Place where it is performed.
17
Meaning and Definition of undue influence.
Ans. Undue influence Sec 16 (a) A contract is said to be induced by Undue influence where the relations subsisting between the Parties are such that one of the Parties is in a position to dominate the will of the other and uses that position to obtain an unfair advantage over the other Essential elements of undue influence 1. There must be a Pre-existing relationship between the persons who make the contract. 2. The relationship is of such a nature that one of the two is in a position to dominate over the will of the other person. 3. The dominant person uses his position to acquire an unfair advantage over the person in weaker position. Difference between coercion and undue influence
Coercion
Undue influence
1. Parties to a contract may as may not be Parties to a contract are related to each other related to each other. under some sort of relationship
2. Consent is obtained by giving a threat of Consent is obtained by dominating the will. an offence or committing an offence 3. It involves physical pressure It involves moral pressure.
4. It can be exercised even by a stranger to It can be exercised only by a party to contract the contract. and not by a stranger. 5. The party committing the crime may be It doesnt involve any criminal liability punishable under I.P.C.
Fraud and Misrepresentation Fraud 1. A wrong representation is made willfully with the intention to deceive the other party.
18
Misrepresentation 1. A wrong representation is made
innocently, i.e. without any intention to deceive the other party
2. The person making the wrong statement does not believe it to be true. 3. The aggrieved party can claim damages.
2. The person making the wrong statement believes it to be true 3. The Aggrieved party cannot claim
damages.
Wagering Contract money or moneys worth on
Contingent Contract the do or not to do something if some event happen.
1. Sec. 30 a Wager is a Promise to pay 1)Sec.31 a Contingent Contract is a contract to
happening or not happening of an collateral to such contract does or does not uncertain event
2. All wagering contracts are contingent 2)All contingent contract are not wagering contracts 3. Wagering contracts are void contracts. 3)Contingent contract are not void unless they are dependant on an impossible event. 4. In a wager, the uncertain event is 4)In a contingent contract the event may be beyond the power of both parties within the power of one of the parties
5. The basis of wagering contract is mutual 5) In a contingent contract there is no chance of chance of loss and gain of the parties loss or gain of any party.
Q.8 Define the Anticipatory Breach of Contract. What are the remedies available on a breach of contract. Ans. Meaning of Anticipatory Breach of Contract :- Anticipatory breach occurs when the party declares his intention at not performing the contract before the performance is due. Thus, when a party refuses to perform a contract even before it is due for performance. It is called anticipatory breach. A remedy is the means give by law for the enforcement of a right. Types of Breach of Contract There are two types of Breach of contract namely. (1) Actual beach (2) Anticipatory or Constructive breach.
19
Remedies for Breach of contract (1) Rescission of the Contract (Sec-39) (2) Suit for damages (Sec-73) Principal of damages Principal of damages (1) The compensation can be claimed only from the party who has broken the contract. (2) If a quasi contract is broken, the aggrieved party is entitled to receive the same compensation from the defaulting party as would be party is entitled to receive the same compensation from the defaulting party to such in case of any other contract. (3) The aggrieved party is entitled to claim compensation only when he has suffered some loss or damage by the breach of the contract. (4) The compensation can also be claimed for any loss or damage which the parties. Knew, at the time of making the contract to be likely to result from the breach of the contract, in other words, special damages are also recoverable. Rules regarding the Damages 1. The ordinary damages are recoverable. 2. The remote damages are not recoverable. 3. The aggrieved party is entitled to damages even if a quasi contract is broken. 4. The nominal damages may be awarded at the discretion of the court. 5. The damages for loss of reputation are not generally recoverable.
Suit for a Quantum Meruit Quantum Meruit means As much as he has earned Thus quantum Meruit means that a person can recover compensation in Proportion to the part to work done by him. If a contract comes to an end and one party has already performed a part of it. He is entitled to claim compensation for the part he has performed. Suit for specific performance Specific performance means to carry out actual obligations as per the terms of contract. When damages are not an adequate remedy for breach of contract. The court can insist on the parties to carry out their agreement. It is
20
important that specific performance cannot be claimed as a matter of right and the courts are always at discretion to grant the relief by specific performance. Examples A, an author contracted with B to write a book him. Later on A refused to write the book, here B cannot obtain the specific performance of the contract as it involves the personnel qualification of A. Suit for injunction Suit for injunction means demanding courts stay order. Injunction means on order of the Court which prohibits a persons to do a particular act. Where a party to a contract does something which he promised not to do. order prohibiting him from doing so. Example A, a dancer, agrees to dance at Bs hotel at certain rid. She also agrees that during the prescribed period she will not dance at any other hotel, later on, A contracts with to dance at his hotel and refuses to dance at Bs hotel B files a suit for restraining A from dancing at its hotel. Here, although A can not compelled to dance at Bs hotel, but she c an be retrained by injunction from dancing at Cs Hotel. Q.9 Discuss the modes of performance of contract. Ans. Modes of the performance of contract there are following six rules. 1. Where no time is specified and no application is to be made S.46. 2. Time and place of performance where time is specified but no application is to be made Sec 47. 3. When performance to be made on certain day at proper time and place. 4. Where no place is fixed and no application is to be made for performance. 5. Performance to be made in manner or at time prescribed or sanctioned by the promise. (1) Where no time is specified and no application is to be made Sec 46 says that Where by the contract a promisor is to perform his promise without application by the promise and no time for performance is specified the engagement must be performed within a reasonable time. (2) Time and place of performance where time is specified but no application is to be made Sec 47 - Provides when a promise is to be performed on a ce rtain day, and the promisor has undertaken to perform it without application by the promise, the promisor may perform it at
21
The court may sue an
any time during the usual hours of business on such day and at the place at which the promise ought to be performed Example A promises to deliver goods at Bs warehouse on the Ist January. On that day A bring to Bs ware house but after the usual hour from closing it and they are not received. A ha not performed his promise. (3) When performance to be made on certain day at proper time and place - Duty of promise to apply for performance Sec 48 of the Act, When a promise is to be performed on a certain day, and the promisor has not undertaken to perform it without application by the promise, it is the duty of the promise to apply for performance at a proper place and within the usual hours of business. (4) Where no place is fixed and no application is to be made for performance Duty of Promisor to apply to promise to appoint place Sec 49 When a promise is to be performed without application by the Promisee and no place is fixed for the performance of it, it is the duty of the Promisor to apply to, the Promisee to appoint a reasonable place for the performance of the promise and to perform it at such place. Example :- P undertakes to delivers one thousand maunds of jute to M on fixed day. P must apply to B to appoint a reasonable place for the Purpose of receiving it, and must deliver it to him at such place. (5) Performance to be made in Manner or at time Prescribed or Sanctioned by the Promisee Sec-50 The Promisor is bound to perform the Promise in any manner, or at any time which the promise prescribes or Sanctions. Example:- A owes B 2000 rupees B accepts some of As goods in deduction of the debt. The delivery of the goods operates a part payment. Case (1) Branch Manager, State Bank of Mysore v. K. Amarnath, AIR 2003 Kant 202. (2) Jai Durga Finvest Pvt. Ltd v. State of Haryana AIR 2004 S.C. 1484 (3) Ceean International Private Limited v. Ashok Surana, AIR 2003 Cat. 263 (4) F.C.I v. Anupama Warehousing Establishment, AIR 2004 Ker. 137 (5) R.K Saxena v. Delhi Development Authority AIR 2002 S.C 2340
Q.10 What are the various modes of discharge of a contract Ans.(1)Discharge by Performance Each party to a contract is bound to perform his part of the
22
obligation. After the parties have made due performance of the contract. Their liability under the contract comes to an end. In such a case, the contract is said to be discharged by performance. Varous rules of performance of the contract have been discussed. (2) Discharge by Breach of contract Thus, insolvency of a party to a contract discharges the contract. A party is released from performing his part of the contract by law e.g. an insolvent from paying his debts, a person whose performance of a transaction is declared by law to be illegal is also similarly excused (Sec.37) (3) Discharge by refusing tender of performance Where a Promisor has made an offer of performance to the Promisee, and the offer has not been accepted, the promisor is not responsible for non-performance, nor does he thereby lose his rights under the contract (Sec 38) (4) Discharge by Refusal of a Party to perform promise wholly or discharge by breach (Sec 39)- When a party to a contract has refused to perform, or disabled himself from performing his promise in its entirety the promisee may put an end to the contract, unless he has signified (by words or conduct), his acquiescence in its continuance. Sec 39 Forms of discharge by breach (a) By renunciation of liability before performance is due. There are two limitations to this (1) it must relate to the whole performance, (2) It must be treated as a discharge (Sec.39) (b) By impossibility created by one party before performance is due. (c) By renunciation in the course of performance. e.g. where a purchaser of 100. Bales, after accepting delivery of 50 bales, refuses to accept the remaining 50, the seller is discharged and can sue for damages. (d) By impossibility created by one party in the course of performance. e.g. where a party puts it out of his power to continue performance of his promise. (e) By failure of performance, which may be of the whole of the promise or of a part of it, e.g. in case of delivery and payment by instalments. (5) Discharge by the Act to be performed under the contract becoming impossible or unlawful (Sec 56)
23
(6)
Discharge by Agreement and Novation (Sec 62) Deals with the effect of rescission or alteration of a contract. It runs thus if the parties to a contract agree to substitute a new contract for it, or to rescind or alter it, the original contract need not be performed. For examples (a) (a) A owes money to B under a contract. It is agreed between A, B and C, that B shall thenceforth accept C as his debtor. Instead of A, the old debt of A to B is at an end, and a new debt from C to B has been contracted. Doctrine of Novation The term novation has been thus defined by the house of lords That, there being a contract in existence. Some new contract is substituted for it either between the same parties or between different parties, the consideration being mutually the discharge of the old contract In India, there is novatio when the parties are changed or the nature of the obligation is changed. Forms of novation The parties to a contract may substitute new terms for the old ones, as indicated by illustration (a) In the former case, there is a substitution of new terms for the old ones while the parties remain the same . In the later case, a new party is substituted for old one. In both the cases, the old debt is at an end, and a new one takes its place, the old contract is replaced by a new contract. or (b) It may be agreed between the original promisor, the original promise and a third party that the promise will look to the third party, instead of the original promisor, for the performance of the contract as in illustration. Effect of Novation In cases where there is a novation, the old contract is completely, extinguished, and a suit based on it is not maintainable. (Reference Book) (5) Discharge by waiver of contract Sec 63 a contract may also be discharged by way of waiver, i.e. by the promisee dispensing with or remitting the performance of the promise made to him. Sec 63 provides that every promisee may (1) Dispense with the performance of the promise made to him (2) Remit wholly or in part. (3) Extend the time for such performance. (4) Accept, instead at it, any satisfaction which he thinks fit.
24
For examples (a) A promises to paint a picture for B, B, after wards forbids him to do so, A is no longer bound to perform the promise. .
Q.11 Discuss the modes of performance of contract. Ans. Modes of the performance of contract there are following six rules. 1. Where no time is specified and no application is to be made S.46. 2. Time and place of performance where time is specified but no application is to be made Sec 47. 3. When performance to be made on certain day at proper time and place. 4. Where no place is fixed and no application is to be made for performance. 5. Performance to be made in manner or at time prescribed or sanctioned by the promise. (6) Where no time is specified and no application is to be made Sec 46 says that Where by the contract a promisor is to perform his promise without application by the promise and no time for performance is specified the engagement must be performed within a reasonable time. (7) Time and place of performance where time is specified but no application is to be made Sec 47 - Provides when a promise is to be performed on a certain day, and the promisor has undertaken to perform it without application by the promise, the promisor may perform it at any time during the usual hours of business on such day and at the place at which the promise ought to be performed Example A promises to deliver goods at Bs warehouse on the Ist January. On that day A bring to Bs ware house but after the usual hour from closing it and they are not received. A ha not performed his promise. (8) When performance to be made on certain day at proper time and place - Duty of promise to apply for performance Sec 48 of the Act, When a promise is to be performed on a certain day, and the promisor has not undertaken to perform it without application by the promise, it is
25
the duty of the promise to apply for performance at a proper place and within the usual hours of business. (9) Where no place is fixed and no application is to be made for performance Duty of Promisor to apply to promise to appoint place Sec 49 When a promise is to be performed without application by the Promisee and no place is fixed for the performance of it, it is the duty of the Promisor to apply to, the Promisee to appoint a reasonable place for the performance of the promise and to perform it at such place. Example :- P undertakes to delivers one thousand maunds of jute to M on fixed day. P must apply to B to appoint a reasonable place for the Purpose of receiving it, and must deliver it to him at such place. (10) Performance to be made in Manner or at time Prescribed or Sanctioned by the Promisee Sec-50 The Promisor is bound to perform the Promise in any manner, or at any time which the promise prescribes or Sanctions. Example:- A owes B 2000 rupees B accepts some of As goods in deduction of the debt. The delivery of the goods opera tes a part payment. Case 1. Branch Manager, State Bank of Mysore V.K. Amarnath, AIR 2003 Kant 202. 2. Jai Durga Finvest Pvt. Ltd V. State of Haryana AIR 2004 S.C. 1484 3. Ceean International Private Limited v. Ashok Surana, AIR 2003 Cat. 263 4. F.C.I v. Anupama Warehousing Establishment, AIR 2004 Ker. 137 5. R.K Saxena v. Delhi Development Authority AIR 2002 S.C 234
Q.12 What are the various modes of discharge of a contract Ans.(1)Discharge by Performance Each party to a contract is bound to perform his part of the obligation. After the parties have made due performance of the contract. Their liability under the contract comes to an end. In such a case, the contract is said to be discharged by performance. Varous rules of performance of the contract have been discussed. (2) Discharge by Breach of contract Thus, insolvency of a party to a contract discharges the contract. A party is released from performing his part of the contract by law e.g. an insolvent from paying his debts, a person whose performance of a transaction is declared by law to be illegal is also similarly excused (Sec.37) (3) Discharge by refusing tender of performance Where a Promisor has made an offer of
26
performance to the Promisee, and the offer has not been accepted, the promisor is not responsible for non-performance, nor does he thereby lose his rights under the contract (Sec 38) (4) Discharge by Refusal of a Party to perform promise wholly or discharge by breach (Sec 39)- When a party to a contract has refused to perform, or disabled himself from performing his promise in its entirety the promisee may put an end to the contract, unless he has signified (by words or conduct), his acquiescence in its continuance. Sec 39 Forms of discharge by breach (f) By renunciation of liability before performance is due. There are two limitations to this (1) it must relate to the whole performance, (3) It must be treated as a discharge (Sec.39) (g) By impossibility created by one party before performance is due. (h) By renunciation in the course of performance. e.g. where a purchaser of 100. Bales, after accepting delivery of 50 bales, refuses to accept the remaining 50, the seller is discharged and can sue for damages. (i) By impossibility created by one party in the course of performance. e.g. where a party puts it out of his power to continue performance of his promise. (j) By failure of performance, which may be of the whole of the promise or of a part of it, e.g. in case of delivery and payment by instalments. (5) Discharge by the Act to be performed under the contract becoming impossible or unlawful (Sec 56)
(6)
Discharge by Agreement and Novation (Sec 62) Deals with the effect of rescission or alteration of a contract. It runs thus if the parties to a contract agree to substitute a new contract for it, or to rescind or alter it, the original contract need not be performed. For examples (a) (c) A owes money to B under a contract. It is agreed between A, B and C, that B shall thenceforth accept C as his debtor. Instead of A, the old debt of A to B is at an end, and a new debt from C to B has been contracted.
27
Doctrine of Novation The term novation has been thus defined by the house of lords That, there being a contract in existence. Some new contract is substituted for it either between the same parties or between different parties, the consideration being mutually the discharge of the old contract In India, there is novatio when the p arties are changed or the nature of the obligation is changed. Forms of novation The parties to a contract may substitute new terms for the old ones, as indicated by illustration (a) In the former case, there is a substitution of new terms for the old ones while the parties remain the same . In the later case, a new party is substituted for old one. In both the cases, the old debt is at an end, and a new one takes its place, the old contract is replaced by a new contract. or (d) It may be agreed between the original promisor, the original promise and a third party that the promise will look to the third party, instead of the original promisor, for the performance of the contract as in illustration. Effect of Novation In cases where there is a novation, the old contract is completely, extinguished, and a suit based on it is not maintainable. (Reference Book) (5) Discharge by waiver of contract Sec 63 a contract may also be discharged by way of waiver, i.e. by the promisee dispensing with or remitting the performance of the promise made to him. Sec 63 provides that every promisee may (1) Dispense with the performance of the promise made to him (2) Remit wholly or in part. (3) Extend the time for such performance. (4) Accept, instead at it, any satisfaction which he thinks fit. For examples (a) A promises to paint a picture for B, B, after wards forbids him to do so, A is no longer bound to perform the promise. .
Q.13 What is Contingent contract ? Ans. Section 31, a contingent contract is a contract to do or not to do something, if some event, collateral to such contract, does not happen. When the contract is dependent or conditional upon the happening or non-happening of a certain future event, the contract is contingent. For example, A contracts to pay B Rs.10,000 if Bs house is burnt, this is a
28
contingent contract.1 The payment of the amount is contingent on the happening of a collateral event i.e., the burning of the house. All contracts of insurance or indemnity aim at payment of money only after a certain event happens, or the loss is caused, and therefore, they are contingent contracts. A wagering agreement is also a contingent contract, but that type of contingent contract has been specifically declared to be void by section 30. A distinction is to be drawn between a contract under which a present obligation is created but performance is postponed to a future date and a contract under which there is no present obligation at all and the obligation is to arise by reason of some condition being complied with or some contingency arising in future. In Harbaksh Singh Gill v. Ram Ratan, AIR 1988 the vendor agreed to sell his half share in the property in dispute, but the sale deed was to be executed after a month of the partition of the property and separation of his share. The vendor undertook to get his share separated but failed to get that done. It was held that the contract was not a contingent one and the same was, therefore, not frustrated by the vendors own wrong or failure to get his share separated. The vendee was held entitled to obtain an injunction restraining the vendor from transferring the property to somebody else. When the performance of the contract is not dependent on the happening of some event collateral to the contract, it is an absolute contract and it must be performed unconditionally. In Bashir Ahmed v. Govt. of Andhra Pradesh, AIR 1970 3, C.1089.
Enforcement of contingent contract The following are the rules governing the enforcement of the various kinds of contingent contracts : 1. Contracts contingent on an event happening Contingent contracts to do or not to do anything if an uncertain future event happens cannot be enforced by law unless and until that event has happened. If the event becomes impossible, such contracts become void. 7 (a) A makes a contract with B to buy Bs house if A survives C. This contract cannot be enforced by law unless and until C dies in As life-time.
29
(b) A makes a contract with B to sell a horse to B at a specified price, if C, to whom the horse has been offered refuses to buy him : The contract cannot be enforced by law unless and until C refuses to buy the horse.
2. Contracts contingent on the event not happening Contingent contracts to do or not to do anything if an uncertain future event does not happen, can be enforced when the happening of that event becomes impossible, and not before. Sec 33. For example, A agrees to pay B a sum of money if a certain ship does not return. This ship is sunk. The contract can be enforced when the ship sinks.10
3. Contract contingent on the future conduct of a living person If the future event on which a contract is contingent is the way in which a person will act at an unspecified time, the event shall be considered to become impossible when such person does anything which renders impossible that he should so act within any definite time, or otherwise than under future contingencies. Sec 34 A agrees to pay B a sum of money if B marries C. C marries D. The marriage of B to C must now be considered impossible although it is possible that D may die, and that C may afterwards marry B.12 Sec 34 4. Contracts contingent on happening of specified event within fixed time Contingent contracts to do or not to do anything, if a specified uncertain event happens within a fixed time, become void if, at the expiration of the time fixed, such event has not happened, or if, before the time fixed, such event becomes impossible. Sec 35 A promises to pay B a sum of money if a certain ship returns within a year. The contract may be enforced if the ship returns within the year, and becomes void if the ship is burnt within the year. Sec 35 5. Contracts contingent on not happening of specified event within a fixed time Contingent contracts to do or not to do anything, if a specified uncertain event does not happens within a fixed time, may be enforced by law when the time fixed has expired and such event has not happened or before the time fixed has expired, if it becomes certain that such event will not happen.
30
For example, A promises to pay B a sum of money if a certain ship does not return within a year. The contract may be enforced if the ship does not return within the year, or is burnt within the year. Sec 35 6. Agreements contingent on impossible event Contingent agreements to do or not to do anything, if an impossible event happens, are void, whether the impossibility of the event is known or not to the parties to the agreement at the time when it is made. Sec 36 (a) A agrees to pay B 1,000 rupees if two straight lines should enclose a space. agreement is void. (b) A agrees to pay B, 1000 rupees if B will marry As daughter, C. C was dead at the time of the agreement. The agreement is void. The
Q.14 What is Quantum Meruit ? Ans. Ordinarily, if a person, having agreed to do some work or render some services, has done only a part of what he was required to do, he cannot claim anything for what he has done. When a person agrees to complete some work for a lump sum, non-completion of the work does not entitle him to any remuneration even for the part of the work done. But the law recognizes an important exception to this rule by way of an action for Quantum Meruit. Under this action, if A and B have entered into a contract, and A, who has already performed a part of the contract is then prevented by B from performing the rest of his obligation under the contract, A can recover from B reasonable remuneration for whatever he has already done. Appleby v. Myers, 1867. It may be noted that this action is not an action for compensation for the breach of contract by the other side. It is an action which is alternative to an action for the breach of contract. This action in essence is one of restitution, putting the party injured by the breach of contract in a position in which he would have been, had the contract not been entered into. It merely entitles the injured party to be compensated for whatever work he may have already done, or whatever expense he may have incurred. In the words of Alderson, De Birnardy v. Harding (1853) 3. The nature of this remedy was explained by the Supreme Court in Puran Lal v. State of U.P. AIR 1971 as under :
31
In order to avail of the remedy under quantum meruit, the original contract must have been discharged by the defendant in such a way as to entitle the plaintiff to regard himself as discharged from any further performance and he must have elected to do so. The remedy it may be noticed is, however, not available to the party who breaks the contract even though he may have partially performed part of his obligation. This remedy by way of quantum meruit is restitutory, that is, it is a recompense for the value of the work done by the plaintiff in order to restore him to the position which he would have been in if the contract had never been entered into. In this regard, it is different to a claim for damages which is a compensatory remedy aimed at placing the injured party, as near as may be, in the position which he would have been in, had the other party performed the contract. The essentials of an action of quantum meruit are as follows : 1. One of the parties makes a breach of contract, or prevents the performance of it by the other side. 2. The party injured by the breach of the contract, who has already performed a part of it, elects to be discharged from further performance of the contract and brings an action for recompense for the value of the work he has he has already done. For instance, if A agrees to deliver B 500 bags of wheat and when A has already delivered 100 bags B refuses to accept any further supply. A can recover from B the value of wheat which he has already delivered. In De Bernardy v. Harding, 80 the defendant, who was to erect and let seats to view the funeral of the Duke of Wellington, appointed the plaintiff as his agent to advertise and sell tickets for the seats. The plaintiff was to be paid a commission on the tickets sold by him. The plaintiff incurred some expense in advertising for the tickets but before any tickets were actually sold by him, authority to sell tickets was wrongfully revoked by the defendant. It was held that the plaintiff was entitled to recover the expenses already
incurred by him, an action for quantum meruit. The remedy by way of quantum meruit is not a contractual remedy although in some cases the remedy is available on the breach of contract by a party to it. The real nature of the remedy is quasi-contractual. The remedy has, therefore, been held to be available when the work has been done by the plaintiff under a void agreement. In Cravan-Ellis v.
32
Cannon Ltd.(1936) 2 the plaintiff was appointed managing director of a company and he was to be paid certain remuneration for his services. The agreement of his appointment was void because contrary to the requirement of the Articles of Association, he and the other directors, who had appointed him had failed to take the qualification shares within the prescribed time limit. The plaintiff, however, continued to render the services to the
company. It was held that though the contract was void and the plaintiff could not claim anything on that basis, he was still entitled to recover for the services rendered by him on his claim on the quantum meruit. Greer, L.J. observed83 : The obligation to pay reasonable remuneration for the work done when there is no binding contract between the parties is imposed by the rule of law, and not by an inference of fact arising from the acceptance of services or goods. It is one of the cases referred to in books on contracts as obligations arising quasi ex contractu. In Associated Cement Co. Ltd. v. Union of India AIR 1998 M.P241 the railway authority charged excess freight from the appellant on the supposition that cement from one of the appellants factories is to be carried by a longer route. The goods were, in fact, carried by a shorter route. The excess fare charged was because of mistake and therefore, the contract was void ab initio. It was held that the appellants could claim the excess amount paid by them and the respondent, i.e. the Railway authorities could retain the freight for carrying the goods to actual distance on the basis of the application of the doctrine of Quantum Meruit.
Q.15 What is Declaratory Decrees ? Ans. A person entitled to any legal character or any right as to any property1 may seek a declaration from a court to that effect so that there are no adverse attack which could weaken that legal character or title.2 The declaration could be sought under Section 34, which reads as under 34. Discretion of court as to declaration of status or right. Any person entitled to any legal character; or to any right as to any property, may institute a suit against any person denying, or interested to deny, his title to such character or right, and the court may in its discretion make therein a declaration that he is so entitled, and the plaintiff need not in such suit ask for any further relief :
33
Provided that no court shall make any such declaration where the plaintiff, being able to seek further relief than a mere declaration of title, omits to do so. Explanation A trustee of property is a person interested to deny a title adverse to the title of some one who is not in existence, and for whom, if in existence, he would be a trustee.
Requisites of a declaratory suit (Section 34) In order to get relief by way of a decree the following essentials are to be proved by the plaintiff3 : (1) That at the time of the suit the plaintiff was entitled to (i) (ii) Any legal character ; To any right as to any property
What has to be proved is that the plaintiff was entitled to either the legal character, or to any right as to any property and either of them exclusively can be the basis of the suit.4 A declaration under Section 34 can not be sought for a declaration regarding the subsistence of a contract between the parties as the same neither relates to any legal character, nor any right to property.5 (2) The suit can be instituted against any person denying or interested in denying the plaintiffs right to any legal character, or to any right as to any property. A trustee of property is a person interested to deny a title adverse to the title of some one who is not in existence, and for whom, if in existence, he would be a trustee. 6 The above mentioned provision may be explained through the following illustrations7 : (a) A is lawfully in possession of certain land. The inhabitants of a neighbouring village claim a right of way across the land. A may sue for a declaration that they are not entitled to the right so claimed. Plaintiff to prove his title to property for declaration and consequential relief In S. Madasamy v. A.M. Arjuna Raja, AIR 2000 Mad 465 It has been held that in a suit for declaration of title and consequential injunction, the burden is on the plaintiff to prove his right and possession over property. If the plaintiff fails to prove his clear title to property he is not entitled to such declaration and the consequential injunction.
34
If oral and documentary evidence indicates that the defendant had actual possession of property and had constructed building over property in dispute, the plaintiff can not obtain declaration etc. unless he proves his right to the possession over property.
Discretion of the Court The Court has a discretion to make declaration of status or right, claimed under Section 34. The Court is not bound to grant a declaratory decree in favour of the plaintiff in all cases where such a suit is validly brought. The court may, in its discretion make a declaration that the plaintiff is entitled to the same. In Smt. Suman Mahajan v. Kusum Sandhu, AIR 1999 Delhi 314 Corporation of India v. Tufan Mondal,10 In Life Insurance Corporation of India v. Tufan Mondal AIR 1999 Dismissal of the suit without consideration on merit is erroneous In M/s. Anant Associates v. Nagpur Improvement Trust, AIR 2000 S.C. 3350 dismissal of the suit without considering the same on merit is bad in law and should be considered again. In the above mentioned case there was suit for declaration regarding certain property. The appellant also filed an application for temporary injunction. The trail court not only dismissed the application for temporary injunction but also dismissed the suit itself. On the date of dismissal of the suit neither any issues had been framed nor any evidence had been led. The dismissal of the suit was held to be erroneous and the matter was remitted back to the trial court for deciding the suit in accordance with law. In Life Insurance
Executing court cannot grant consequential relief If the plaintiff did not claim consequential relief and the suit is decreed accordingly, the executing court cannot grant the relief which the plaintiff had not claimed at suit level. In State of M.P. v. Mangilal Sharma,16 the plaintiff claimed a declaration that he was in the service of the State Government as he had not been informed that the resignation submitted by him had been granted. The Court granted him a declaration that he continued to be in service. In the suit for declaration the plaintiff had not claimed either arrears of salary or interest on the arrears. It was held that the executing court could not add or alter the decree and, therefore, could not grant arrears of salary and interest thereon to the plaintiff.
35
Effect of declaration (Section 35) According to Section 35, a declaration made under this Chapter is binding only on the parties to the suit, persons claiming through them respectively, and where any of the parties are trustees, on the persons for whom, if in existence at the date of the declaration, such parties would be trustees. The declaration operates as a bar only between the parties to the suit and their privies. It is not binding on her persons. The provision may be explained through the following illustration 17 : A a Hindu in a suit to which B, his alleged wife, and her mother, are defendants, seeks a declaration that his marriage was duly solemnized and an order for the restitution of his conjugal rights. The Court makes the declaration and order. C, claiming that B is his wife, then sues A for the recovery of B. The declaration made in the former suit is not binding upon C. IN SNP Shipping Services Pvt. Ltd. v. World Tanker Carrier Corp.,AIR 2000 Bom.34 it has been held that by virtue of Section 35 of the Specific Relief Act, declaration given under Section 34 is binding only between the parties. notinrem. It is a declaration in personam, and
36
Important Questions
Q.1 Discuss in detail, the essentials of a valid contract. Q.2 Define proposal and acceptance. Explain its legal rules with the help of decided cases.
Q.3 Define consideration & state the exceptions of the rule Agreement without consideration is void.
Q.4 Minors are incapable of entering into a valid contract. Explain the position of minors in Indian Contract Act with suitable case laws.
Q.5 What do you understand by free consent? Discuss effect of fraud in an agreement. Q.6 What do you mean by legality of object and consideration ? Explain public policy. Q.7 Explain Quasi contract. Describe briefly the cases where this theory has been recognised under the provisions of Indian contract Act 1872.
Q.8 What is doctrine of frustration of contracts? Discuss with the help of decided cases.
37
Q.9 What are the various modes of discharge of a contract? Q.10 What are the rules of measure the damage in case of breach of contract? Discuss. Q.11 Discuss various contracts which may be specifically enforced. Q.12 What are the contracts which cannot be specifically enforced? Explain with illustrations.
Q.13 Mention the various remedies provided in specific Relief Act,1963 ? Q.14 Write short note on : a) Contingent contract b) Wagering agreement c) Doctrine of Quantum Merit d) Void agreement e) Declaratory decree f) Types of injunctions -
g) Doctrine of privities of contract -
LL.B./IST YEAR
38

Contract I

Transféré par

Informations du document

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Contract I

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

KAMKUS COLLEGE OF LAW ( BHAGIRATH GROUP OF INSTITUTIONS) (Affiliated to CCS University, Meerut & Approved by Bar council of India,

(An e-initiative by KCL)

Note : Only KCL students are authorized to download the notes

Contract 1st ( LL.B. Ist Year )

Contract are inherent in the

In Nutan Kumar vs. IInd.

What is consideration and define the Present, Past, Future Consideration?

3. In English Law real consideration is necessary Q.5

3. Consideration need not be

Define An Agreement Made without Consideration is Void

Meaning and Definition of undue influence.

Misrepresentation 1. A wrong representation is made

innocently, i.e. without any intention to deceive the other party

Wagering Contract money or moneys worth on

Contingent Contract the do or not to do something if some event happen.

1. Sec. 30 a Wager is a Promise to pay 1)Sec.31 a Contingent Contract is a contract to

The court may sue an

g) Doctrine of privities of contract -

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi