Supplier Process FMEA: Audit Summary

MY/Program Name of Component, Sub-System or System: Responsible Supplier: Responsible Supplier Quality Specialist: Name of Auditor: Date Reviewed: Overall Rating: Header ok? Y N

"X"
Header and all elements Ok = Green Header and/or maximum three other elements not Ok = Yellow Four our more non-Header elements not OK = Red

Number of elements not ok:_____

1 1a 1b 1c 1d 1e 1f 1g 1h 1i

Does the Header Contain Adequate Information ?

Name of Program(s) included? Model Year of Program(s) included? Name of Supplier included? Part Description included? Core Team includes DCX SQ, DCX Eng and Supplier names/title or area? Key Date Shown is PPDC date? Date of original FMEA is shown? Revision dates (level optional) are shown/evidence of living document? No other issues? Overall ok (all "yes")?

Yes No Auditor Comments

2 2a 2b 2c

Is the Process Function/Requirements Column Adequate?

Each operation is (briefly) described, rather than just numbered? Function/Requirements of process are listed (hole diameter, tube length, etc.)? No other issues? Overall ok (all "yes")?

Yes No Auditor Comments

3 3a 3b 3c

Potential Failure Modes Column Adequate?

Failure Modes are written in terms of a characteristic (hole dia., surf. roughness)? Failure Modes are specific ("hole dia. too small" rather than "hole out of spec.")? No other issues? Overall ok (all "yes")?

Yes No Auditor Comments

4 4a 4b

Potential Effects of Failure Column Adequate?

Effects written in terms of what customer (downstream process or end user) will notice/experience (not just "scrap" or "FTC")? No other issues? Overall ok (all "yes")?

Yes No Auditor Comments

5 5a 5b 5c 5d

Severity
Severity rankings not underrated based on AIAG Manual criteria? Safety characteristics are rated with a 9 or 10? Severity rankings identical for identical Potential Effects? No other issues? Overall ok (all "yes")?

Yes No Auditor Comments

6 6a 6b 6c

Class
Safety classification symbol (DCX's or Supplier's) present for all Severity 9 or 10? Critical/key classification symbol (DCX's or Supplier's) present for all Severity 8? No other issues? Overall ok (all "yes")?

Yes No Auditor Comments

7 7a 7b

Potential Causes Column Adequate?

Descriptions specific ("widget installed upside down" not "operator error")? No other issues? Overall ok (all "yes")?

Yes No Auditor Comments

March 17, 2005/8:25 a.m.

PFMEA CQ Evaluation Template with SQ input 17MAR05.xls

Supplier Process FMEA: Audit Summary-Page 2

MY/Program: Name of Component, Sub-System or System: Responsible Supplier: Responsible Supplier Quality Specialist: Name of Auditor: Date Reviewed:

8 8a 8b

Occurrence
One Occurrence ranking for each cause? No other issues? Overall ok (all "yes")?

Yes No Auditor Comments

9 9a 9b 9c

Current Controls Column Adequate?

Controls are correctly identified as either Detection or Prevention controls? Controls are explained and do not just reference a document number? No other issues? Overall ok (all "yes")?

Yes No Auditor Comments

10 Detection 10a One Detection ranking for each Occurrence ranking? 10b Detection ranking consistent with AIAG Manual (Visual Inspection=8, etc.)? 10c Detection ranking based only on best Detection Control (not on Prevention Ctls.)? 10d No other issues?
Overall ok (all "yes")?

Yes No Auditor Comments

11 Recommended Actions & Responsibility Columns Reasonable? 11a Highest RPNs are addressed with needed actions? 11b Severity of 8, 9 or 10 are addressed with needed actions? 11c Recommended Actions are assigned to a specific person (not a department)? 11d Target Completion dates are shown and not past due? 11e No other issues?
Overall ok (all "yes")?

Yes No Auditor Comments

12 Action Results Effectively Executed? 12a Only Recommended Actions with Action Taken have past due dates? 12b Re-rankings affected Occurrence and/or Detection (not Severity)? 12c Occurrence and/or Detection re-rankings consistent with AIAG Manual? 12d No other issues?
Overall ok (all "yes")?

Yes No Auditor Comments

13 Other 13a No other issues?

Overall ok (all "yes")?

Yes No Auditor Comments

March 17, 2005/8:25 a.m.

PFMEA CQ Evaluation Template with SQ input 17MAR05.xls