EVM Golmaal - Match Fixing ?

S.O.S e - Clarion Of Dalit - Weekly Newspaper On Web

Working For The Rights & Survival Of The Oppressed
Editor: NAGARAJA.M.R VOL.8 issue.17 .23/04/2014

Defective EVMs 'transfer' all votes to

Congress in Maharashtra
Sindhudurg: A malfunctioning electronic voting machine (EVM) reportedly "transferred" all
votes cast to the Congress candidate in Sindhudurg district here, in the second incident of its kind
Thursday.
The incident came to light when voters in Padve-mazagaon village complained that when they
pressed their chosen candidate's button, only the Congress light blinked.
Angry voters boycotted the elections for nearly three hours before frantic election officials
ordered a replacement EVM and resumed voting around 1 pm.
At least 68 voters claimed that their vote may have been wrongly credited to Congress candidate
Nilesh Rane contesting from the Ratnagiri-Sindhudurg constituency in the Konkan region.
A similar incident happened at a polling booth in Pune city when voters found that whichever
button was pressed on the EVM, only the Congress light blinked.
Alert voters brought this to the notice of the election officials, who immediately stopped voting.
Voting resumed after a delay of nearly 90 minutes after a new EVM was acquired.
The Election Commission also permitted around 28 voters who had already cast their votes in the
malfunctioning EVM to vote afresh.
Political activists of all parties have demanded an extension of voting hours by three hours in
Sindhudurg and 90 minutes in Pune to compensate for the time lost due to the defective EVMs.

An EVM that 'votes' only for BJP stuns poll

staff in Assam
GUWAHATI: An electronic voting machine raised many eyebrows across the state during a
mandatory mock poll in Jorhat on Tuesday. Every time a button was pressed, the vote went in
favour of BJP.
The Jorhat parliamentary constituency returning officer and deputy commissioner Vishal Vasant
Solanki told TOI that all EVMs in his custody are being put through a second level of test by
engineers of the Electronics Corporation of India Ltd (ECIL), one of the two companies from
Hyderabad, which manufactures EVMs.
This Jorhat Lok Sabha seat has Congress stalwart and former Union minister Bijoy Krishna
Handique locking horns with BJP youth and tea tribal leader Kamakhya Tasa. This will be
Handique's record seventh successive attempt for the Lok Sabha election. Jorhat goes to the polls
on April 7.
State chief electoral officer Vijyandra on Wednesday said, "An EVM in Jorhat was found
malfunctioning yesterday. It is a defective machine and it was noticed when EVMs were readied
in front of representatives of all political parties. We will not send the faulty unit to any polling
station."
An EVM consists of two units, a control unit and a balloting unit. Both unites are connected with
cable. The balloting unit is a small box-like device, on top of which each candidate and his or her
election symbol appears. The voter selects his candidate by pressing the blue button.
The returning officer said, "These EVMs were here for long. Usually, EVMs are kept in the
custody of the deputy commissioner and during elections they are taken to strong rooms."
Congress lodged a complaint with the Election Commission of India on Wednesday and
demanded thorough inspection of all EVMs in just not Jorhat, but the entire state. Pradesh
Congress Committee general secretary Ranjan Bora, who lodged the complaint with EC, said,
"The mock poll was done at random and the EVM for Teok assembly constituency took
everyone by surprise. When the hand symbol button was pressed for Congress, the vote was
found to be recorded in favour of BJP."
He said the incident has fuelled suspicion in their minds that EVMs may have been tampered
with to favour a particular political party.

Interestingly, after Congress got an overwhelming mandate in the 2011 assembly polls, Asom
Gana Parishad had lodged a complaint against Congress accusing it of tinkering with EVMs. The
Congress leadership had rejected this charge and pointed out that EVM results could not be
manipulated.
"EVM tampering could be possible in the Jorhat case," a senior Congress leader said.

Resolution on Electronic Voting

In the wake of several disturbing ground reports, many questions and concerns have been raised
about the use of electronic voting machines in Indian elections by
Endorsers
leaders of political parties, activists, analysts, administrators etc. etc.
Election Commission of India and senior officials involved in the
- All Endorsers
conduct of elections are either unaware of the unacceptable risks to the
- Technologist
election integrity posed by these electronic voting machines or have
chosen to ignore serious concerns concerning EVMs. On the contrary,
- Politicians
they have been making atrocious and unsubstantiated claims that the
- Lawyers
Indian EVMs are fully tamper proof, unriggable and superior to
- Activists
EVMs banned in the West. Here in lies the grave danger to the Indias
- Concerned
democracy.
citizens
There is insufficient appreciation among the general public of the facts
- Others
and issues about this vital matter - largely due to the mystique
concerning anything technological, and to the implicit faith in a
constitutional body such as the Election Commission.
We are not opposed to use of technology per se in elections. But it will be unwise to use
technology without being aware of the attendant risks and without making provisions for
adequate safeguards.
To safeguard Indian democracy, VeTA endorses the following resolution :
"Electronic voting machines are inherently subject to programming error, equipment
malfunction, and malicious tampering. It is therefore crucial that voting machines
provide a voter-verifiable audit trail, by which we mean a print out which would serve
as the permanent record of each vote that can be checked for accuracy by the voter
before the vote is submitted, and is difficult or impossible to alter after it has been
checked. Electronic voting machines used in Indian elections at present do not meet this
standard. Voting machines must be altered or upgraded to provide a voter-verifiable
audit trail.
If the Election Commission of India is unable to enforce this requirement, it must return
to paper ballots which the whole world considers to be the gold standard. Despite the
several problems associated with the paper ballots, elections are transparent and
manipulations are easily visible to all. On the contrary, the electronic voting system is

opaque and manipulations, if any have no chance of being detected.

The basis for the above resolution is elaborated below.

The Problem
Use of electronic voting machines poses many unacceptable risks. In a large number of polling
stations across the country, they have either malfunctioned or misbehaved leading to disruptions
in the polling process and raising serious doubts about the working and reliability of the EVMs.
Read more
While the Election Commission of India claims that the EVMs have helped curb booth
capturing, the reality may be otherwise. There are fears, confirmed by some field reports and
evidences that the electronic voting has ushered in a specialized breed of techies offering
enterprising solutions to fix elections via the electronic voting machines.
The most dangerous thing about electronic rigging is that it would go undetected. This is a very
sophisticated way of electronic booth capturing. Unlike in the traditional booth capturing, this is
neither visible when it happens nor can it be established after elections.
Electronic voting machines used in Indian elections function as black boxes. Voters have no way
to verify that their votes are recorded and counted properly. For this reason, use of voting
machines that do not provide a voter-verifiable audit trail (print-out of every vote) must be
stopped forthwith. In the new regime with voter verified paper ballots, electronic counts may be
checked first for identifying winners. In the case of close contests or in the event of disputes,
print-out ballots should serve as the authentic record of voting, taking precedence over electronic
counts.

If you have any questions or comments please send us an email veta@indianevm.com

India's Electronic Voting Machines Proven Insecure

In a collaborative study, a team of Indian and international experts have revealed that the
electronic voting machines used in Indian elections are vulnerable to fraud. Even brief
access to the machines, known in India as EVMs, could allow criminals to alter election
results.
These research findings are at odds with claims made by the Election Commission of India,

the country's highest election authority, which has maintained that weaknesses found in
other electronic voting systems around the world do not apply to India's EVMs. Less than a
year ago, it stated: "Today, the Commission once again completely reaffirms its faith in the
infallibility of the EVMs. These are fully tamper-proof, as ever." [1] As recently as two days
ago, the Chief Election Commissioner described electronic voting machines as "perfect"
and claimed that "till today, no individual could prove that the EVMs used by the EC can be
tampered with." [2]
Almost the entire population of India votes on electronic voting machines. There are around
1.4 million of the machines in use, all of the controversial "Direct Recording Electronic"
(DRE) variety. Such machines record the votes only to internal memory and provide no
paper records for later inspection or recount. With DREs, absolute trust is placed in the
hardware and software of the voting machines. Paperless electronic voting systems have
been criticized globally and more and more countries and US states are abandoning such
systems altogether.
In a video released today, the researchers show two demonstration attacks against a real
Indian EVM. One attack involves replacing a small part of the machine with a look-alike
component that can be silently instructed to steal a percentage of the votes in favor of a
chosen candidate. These instructions can be sent wirelessly from a mobile phone. Another
attack uses a pocket-sized device to change the votes stored in the EVM between the
election and the public counting session (which in India can be weeks later).
This study was performed by researchers at NetIndia, (P)Ltd., in Hyderabad, the University
of Michigan in the United States, and at a non-profit in the Netherlands that specializes in
electronic voting related issues.
The researchers were also surprised to find that the vote-counting software in the EVMs is
programmed into so-called "mask programmed microcontrollers," which do not allow the
software to be read out and verified. Because these chips are made in the US and Japan,
this has led to a situation in which nobody in India knows for sure what software is in these
machines or whether it counts votes accurately.
Hari Prasad is a computer engineer and managing director of NetIndia, a Hyderabad-based
technology firm. Prasad organized the study and says the findings are the culmination of a
seven month investigation. "Everywhere I looked there were more security problems. I am

glad that with the presentation of this work, the debate over whether India's EVMs are
secure is over. We need to look forward now. India deserves a transparent election
process, which these machines simply cannot deliver."
Rop Gonggrijp, a security researcher from the Netherlands, also took part in the study. Says
Gonggrijp: "Never mind what election officials say, this research once again shows that the
longstanding scientific consensus holds trueDRE voting machines are fundamentally
vulnerable. Such machines have already been abandoned in Ireland, the Netherlands,
Germany, Florida and many other places. India should follow suit."
Gonggrijp continues: "In order to have any transparency in elections, you need to have
votes on paper. Computers can be programmed to count votes honestly, but since nobody
can watch them, they might just as easily be programmed to count dishonestly. How is the
voter supposed to tell the difference?"
Professor J. Alex Halderman of the University of Michigan helped develop the new attacks
along with his students. "Almost every component of this system could be attacked to
manipulate election results," says Dr. Halderman. "This proves, once again, that the
paperless class of voting systems has intrinsic security problems. It is hard to envision
systems like this being used responsibly in elections."
The newly released video and technical report can be found at http://IndiaEVM.org.

India's EVMs are

Vulnerable to Fraud
Hari K. Prasad, J. Alex Halderman, Rop Gonggrijp
Questions & Answers
Q: Who are you?
A: We are scientists and technologists. Some of us have studied other voting systems in

Europe and the US and have discovered serious flaws. In some cases these discoveries
have led to the use of such systems being discontinued.
Q: Why did you study India's EVMs?
A: The Election Commission of India has spoken of India's EVMs as "infallible" and
"perfect", yet similar electronic voting machines used around the world have been shown to
suffer from serious security problems. India's machines had never been subjected to
credible independent research.
Q: How did you get the EVM you studied?
A: It was provided by a source who has asked to remain anonymous.
Q: What have you found?
A: We found that an attacker with brief access to EVMs can tamper with votes and
potentially change election outcomes. We demonstrate two attacks that involve physically
tampering with the EVMs hardware. First, we show how dishonest election insiders or other
criminals could alter election results by replacing parts of the machines with malicious lookalike parts. Such attacks could be accomplished without the involvement of any local poll
officials. Second, we show how attackers could use portable hardware devices to change
the vote records stored in the machines. This attack could be carried out by local election
officials without being detected by the national authorities or the EVM manufacturers.
Safeguards against these attacks are either absent or woefully inadequate. For the full
details, please read our technical paper.
Q. Did you demonstrate attacks on a real EVM?
A: Yes. The EVM we worked with is a real EVM that has been used in recent national
elections.
Q: How could you manipulate the internal memory to change the vote records?
These EVMs are sealed.
A: The seals quite literally consist of stickers, string, and red wax. Tampering with them
would not present a challenge to an attacker. Our video has an excerpt from an official
training film showing some of the seals being applied. Have a look and see if you feel you
could manipulate these seals yourself.
Q: How could a dishonest EVM know which candidate to favour?

A: Our dishonest display board attack adds a Bluetooth radio, so criminals could wirelessly
signal which candidate to favour. Our memory manipulation attacks happen between
election and counting, when everything an attacker needs to know is already public. In our
paper we explain more complicated attacks that use the total number of candidates in a
constituency as a signaling mechanism. These don't need radio signals and could already
be hidden in the software of the EVMs today.
Q: But I watched the election officials perform a mock poll, and that was fine.
A: It would be easy to program a dishonest EVM or EVM component so that the
manipulation is only performed after voting has been going on for a long time, or if the total
number of votes is in the hundreds. That way, simple mock polls will show the proper
results, but all the final election results will be manipulated.
Q: Your video shows a mobile phone signaling to the EVM, but mobile phones are
not allowed at polls and counting.
A: We are merely proving that we can send the signal wirelessly. Attacks could use many
other forms of radio signaling, such as opener that sends the signal. Wireless devices are
extremely easy to conceal and could be secretly carried into polling places in countless
ways.
Q: How can the EVMs be as insecure as you claim while the Election Commission of
India says they are "infallible" and "perfect"?
A: Until now, the EVMs have not been subjected to rigorous, independent, public scrutiny.
Claims that the EVMs are "perfect" and "infallible" are not based on verifiable arguments. If
the Election Commission disagrees with our claims, we look forward to a proper scientific
debate based on credible, published evidence.
Q: The Election Commission has hired scientists too. How do we know you are right
and the Election Commission is wrong?
A: The Election Commission's two expert committee reports were rather minimal and were
performed by scientists with no apparent electronic voting security credentials. These
studies were conducted without access to the machines' source code and relied on
presentations and site visits with the manufacturers. In contrast, we performed our own
experiments with a real machine and demonstrate working attacks.
Q: Haven't you just made our secure EVMs insecure by publishing this?

A: No. The fact that the election authorities have not allowed public scrutiny of the security
of EVMs doesn't make them secure. There are more than 1.4 million EVMs in India, and
criminal attackers would likely have less difficulty getting access to a machine than we did.
Unlike actual criminals, we are working to inform the public about the security problems we
found.
Q: Can the problems with EVMs be fixed?
A: Not easily. The entire class of voting systems to which these EVMs belong has inherent
problems that stem from a lack of transparency. They force voters to trust software and
hardware without proper means of verification.
Q: Surely there must be something we can do to enhance security?
A: The Election Commission likes to speak of "checks and balances", with various
procedures believed to make fraud harder. Drastically improving procedures might make
some kinds of fraud more difficult, but cannot eliminate the risks we describe. For EVMs to
be used, the people of India would need to continue to place trust in an election technology
that they cannot observe.
Q: Can you help me investigate suspected fraud in the recent election in xxxx ?
A: Regrettably, probably not. If our research shows something, it is that for the concerned
citizen there is very likely to be nothing to observe, study and/or investigate (either before,
during or after the election) that would allow anyone to tell the difference between an honest
and a dishonest election. That means you are left either trusting or not trusting your
election, with no hard facts to guide you. We know that this is not a satisfactory answer,
which is exactly why this type of voting machine should be abolished.
Q: Why shouldn't India be at the forefront of technology?
A: We are technologists with a deep passion for things technical, but we also see the
limitations of technology. These electronic voting machines have replaced decidedly
imperfect but observable paper ballots with insecure and completely non-auditable
technology.
Germany and the Netherlands are modern democracies. They both used electronic voting
machines of the same basic type as used in India. In the Netherlands, almost 100% of
voters used these machines, but when it was discovered that these machines had severe
security problems and that there was inadequate transparency, the machines were
abolished and paper ballots were reintroduced. Technological advance is not just about

adopting the latest new inventions. Innovation also lies in the ability to take a second look
and examine whether what seemed like a good idea ten years ago is still a good idea today.
Q. Where can I find more information about the EVM debate in India?
A. An Indian citizens' group called VeTA maintains a web site advocating election
transparency. Our research is independent from VeTA, but we find their site to be generally
informative about the e-voting debate in India. It can be found at IndianEVM.com.

EVM Security Problems[edit]

An international conference on the Indian EVMs and its tamperability of the said machines was held
under the Chairmanship of Dr. Subramanian Swamy, President of the Janata Party and former
Union Cabinet Minister for Law, Commerce and Justice at Chennai on 13 February 2010. This
conference received good response and the conclusion was that the Election Commission of
India was shirking its responsibility on the transparency in the working of the EVMs. [13]
In April 2010, an independent security analysis[1] was released by a research team led by Hari
Prasad, Rop Gonggrijp, and J. Alex Halderman. The study included video demonstrations[2] of two
attacks that the researchers carried out on a real EVM, as well as descriptions of several other
potential vulnerabilities.

Easily Hackable:" US Lab says that, this EVM is very easy to hack.

[14]

Before voting: One demonstration attack was based on replacing the part inside the control
unit that actually displays the candidates' vote totals. The study showed how a substitute,
"dishonest" part could output fraudulent election results. This component can be programmed to
steal a percentage of the votes in favour of a chosen candidate.

After voting: The second demonstration attack used a small clip-on device to manipulate the
vote storage memory inside the machine. Votes stored in the EVM between the election and the
public counting session can be changed by using a specially made pocket-sized device. When
you open the machine, you find micro-controllers, under which are electrically enabled
programs, with 'read-only' memory. It is used only for storage. However, you can read and write
memory from an external interface. The researchers developed a small clip with a chip on the
top to read votes inside the memory and manipulate the data by swapping the vote from one
candidate to another.[4]

In order to mitigate these threats, the researchers suggest moving to a voting system that provides

greater transparency, such as paper ballots, precinct count optical scan, or avoter verified paper
audit trail, since, in any of these systems, sceptical voters could, in principle, observe the physical
counting process to gain confidence that the outcome is fair.
But Election Commission of India points out that for such tampering of the EVMs, one needs
physical access to EVMs, and pretty high tech skills are required. Given that EVMs are stored under
strict security which can be monitored by candidates or their agents all the time, its impossible to
gain physical access to the machines. Plus, to impact the results of an election, hundreds to
thousands of machines will be needed to tamper with, which is almost impossible given the hi-tech
and time consuming nature of the tampering process.[15][16]

EVM Court cases[edit]

On 25 July 2011, responding to a PIL (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 312 of 2011), Supreme Court of
India asked EC to consider request to modify EVMs and respond within 3 months. The petitioner
Rajendra Satyanarayan Gilda had alleged that EC has failed to take any decision despite his
repeated representation. The petitioner suggested that the EVMs should be modified to give a slip
printed with the symbol of the party in whose favour the voter cast his ballot. [6][17][18][19]
On 17 January 2012, Delhi High Court in its ruling on Dr. Subramanian Swamy's Writ Petition (Writ
Petition (Civil) No. 11879 of 2009) challenging the use of EVMs in the present form said that EVMs
are not "tamper-proof". Further, it said that it is "difficult" to issue any directions to the EC in this
regard. However, the court added that the EC should itself hold wider consultations with the
executive, political parties and other stake holders on the matter.[5][5]
Dr Swamy appealed against Delhi High Court's refusal to order a VVPAT system in Supreme Court.
On 27 September 2012, Election Commission's advocate Ashok Desai submitted to a Supreme
Court bench of Justice P Sathasivam and Justice Ranjan Gogoi that field trial for VVPAT system is
in progress and that a status report will be submitted by early January 2013. Desai said that on
pressing of each vote, a paper receipt will be printed, which will be visible to the voters inside a glass
but cannot be taken out of the machine. To this, Dr Swamy replied that the new system was
acceptable to him. The Supreme Court posted the matter for further hearing to 22 January 2013. [20][21]
Another similar writ petition filed by the Asom Gana Parishad is still pending before the Gauhati High
Court.[22]

How can someone tamper with an

electronic voting machine?
by Julia Layton

The November 2006 elections that decided the make-up of the U.S. Congress and state
and local governments faced more uncertainty than any election to date. Instead of
"Democrat or Republican," the more pressing question became "accurate count or
complete debacle?" More than 60 million Americans cast their votes on electronic voting
machines for the first time in 2006. Some feared human and machine error, both of
which have occurred in almost all electronic voting since the machines were introduced
in limited scope in 2002. Others feared a darker foe, and it's not just conspiracy
theorists: For the past three or four years, computer scientists have been tampering with
voting machines to prove it can be done. And they say it's actually pretty easy.
With electronic voting, the entire setup is electronic, not just the actual casting of the
vote. The general process of electronic voting on the most common touchscreen
models goes something like this:
The voter checks in with election personnel, who enter the voter's name into a
computer database to make sure he or she has not already voted.
The voter is given a "smart card" -- basically a credit-card-type device with a
microchip in it -- that activates the electronic voting machine.
The voter casts his or her vote by touching a name on the screen.
If the model includes printout capabilities (which is required by more than half of
U.S. states), the voter receives a printout that verifies his or her choices before leaving
the booth. If the printout is correct, the voter inserts it into voting machine before leaving
the booth to complete the voting process. (If it's incorrect, different models have
different remedies, but it's safe to say it starts to get messy at that point). In non-printout models, the voter leaves the booth after cast his or her vote on the touchscreen.
Once the polling place has closed, an election official inserts a supervisor's smart
card into the voting machine and enters a password to access the tally of all votes on
that machine. Election officials either transmit the tallies electronically, via a network
connection, to a central location for the county, or else carry the memory card by hand
to the central location.
Election officials point out that there are many safeguards in place to make sure no one
tampers with the voting machines -- this is an election we're talking about, after all.
Some of those safeguards include tamper-resistant tape over the machine's memory
card slot, a lock over the memory card slot and the machine's battery, and the process
of comparing the total votes on the memory card to the number of voters at polling place
and to a voting record stored on the machine's hard disk (and to physical printouts if
available). Machines are password protected and require special access cards for
anyone to get to the memory card, and most polling places conduct background checks
of election workers. Finally, the software on these machines automatically encrypts
every vote that is cast. So, where does the problem come in?

Experts point out lots of areas that need improvement, but as you can probably tell from
the list of safeguards above, the memory card is considered to be the weakest point in
the system. Princeton University computer-science professor Edward Felton and a
couple of his graduate students got themselves one of the most common voting
machines -- a Diebold AccuVote-TS -- and had their way with it. They picked the lock
blocking access to the memory card and replaced it with a memory card they had
infected with a virus. The virus altered the votes cast on the machine in a way that
would be undetectable to election officials, because the vote numbers were not only
changed on the memory card, but also in all of the backup logs on the machine's hard
disk. So the final numbers matched up just fine. Another report, this one by a computer
science professor who is also an election volunteer, states that the security tape
protected the memory card slot looks almost exactly the same after someone removes it
and then replaces it -- you have to hold the machine at a certain angle in the light to see
the "VOID" imprint that arises after tampering.
Other experts focus on the software that records each vote. It's too simple, they say,
and not encrypted well enough. The typical code is a standard "Roger Moore = 1" and
"Sean Connery = 2" type of setup, which even a computer neophyte could tamper with if
they have access to the machine. All it would take is a memory card with a bug loaded
onto it to switch the values. Also at issue is the type of encryption used in the voting
machines, which experts say is far from state of the art. But at least in the case of the
Diebold machines, experts really only have access to one older version of the software
that was leaked through a security hole in the Diebold network, so no one can be sure
whether the same flaws exist in the latest version of the program. Diebold won't release
the software for public review because it's proprietary.
Beyond the machine itself, the method of electronically transferring tallies between
polling places and a central location for the county is another possible point of
weakness. A hacker can intercept the vote tallies on their way to the central counting
location by attaching a what amounts to a tap at the network router or hub. He or she
could grab the numbers on their way across the network -- which in many cases isn't
encrypted -- and load up a different set of tallies in their place. However, as long as the
central location double checks the electronically transmitted numbers with the memory
cards and printouts from each polling place, this method of fraud would ultimately fail.
Disadvantages of EVM :
Some disadvantages of electronic voting can include viruses and hacking, as well
physical tampering. Despite elaborate safeguards, Indias EVMs are vulnerable to
serious attacks.
1. EVM Software Isnt Safe
The electronic voting machines are safe and secure only if the source code used in the

EVMs is genuine. Shockingly, the EVM manufacturers, the BEL and ECIL have shared
the top secret EVM software program with two foreign companies, Microchip (USA)
and Renesas (Japan) to copy it onto microcontrollers used in EVMs. This process could
have been done securely in-house by the Indian manufacturers. Worse, when the
foreign companies deliver microcontrollers fused with software code to the EVM
manufacturers, the EVM manufacturers cannot read back their contents as they are
either OTP-ROM or masked chips. Amusingly, the software given to foreign companies
is not even made available with the Election Commission, ostensibly for security
reasons. With such ridiculous decisions, the Election Commission and the public sector
manufacturers have rendered security of the EVMs a mockery. (GVL Narasimha Raohttp://www.indianevm.com/articles/ten-reasons-for-banning-indian-evms.pdf)
2. EVM hardware Isnt Safe
The danger for EVM manipulations is not just from its software. Even the hardware isnt
safe. Dr. Alex Halderman, professor of computer science in the University of Michigan
says, EVMs used in the West require software attacks as they are sophisticated voting
machines and their hardware cannot be replaced cheaply. In contrast, the Indian EVMs
can easily be replaced either in part or as wholesale units. One crucial part that can be
faked is microcontrollers used in the EVMs in which the software is copied. EVM
manufacturers have greatly facilitated fraud by using generic microcontrollers rather
than more secure ASIC or FPGA microcontrollers. Not just only microcontrollers, mother
boards (cards which contain microcontrollers) and entire EVMs can be replaced. Neither
the Election Commission nor the manufacturers have undertaken any hardware or
software audit till date. As a result, such manipulation attempts would go undetected. To
detect such fraud, the upgraded EVMs have a provision to interface with an
Authentication Unit that would allow the manufacturers to verify whether the EVM being
used in the election is the same that they have supplied to the Election Commission.
The EVM manufacturers developed an Authentication Unit engaging the services of
SecureSpin, a Bangalore based software services firm. The Unit was developed and
tested in 2006 but when the project was ready for implementation, the project was
mysteriously shelved at the instance of the Election Commission. Several questions
posed to the Election Commission for taking this decision went unanswered. (GVL
Narasimha Rao-http://www.indianevm.com/articles/ten-reasons-for-banning-indianevms.pdf)
3. Vulnerability to hacking:
The Indian EVMs can be hacked both before and after elections to alter election
results. Apart from manipulating the EVM software and replacing many hardware parts
discussed above, Indian EVMs can be hacked in many ways. To possibilities may be
mentioned :Each EVM contains two EEPROMs inside the Control Unit in which the voting data is
stored. They are completely unsecured and the data inside EEPROMs can be
manipulated from an external source. It is very easy to read (data from) the EEPROMs
and manipulate them (GVL Narasimha Rao-http://www.indianevm.com/articles/ten-

reasons-for-banning-indian-evms.pdf)
The second and the most deadly way to hack Indian EVMs is by inserting a chip with
Trojan inside the display section of the Control unit. This requires access to the EVM for
just two minutes and these replacement units can be made for a few hundred rupees.
Bypassing completely all inbuilt securities, this chip would manipulate the results and
give out fixed results on the EVM screen. The Election Commission is completely
oblivious to such possibilities. ( http://www.indianevm.com/articles/ten-reasons-forbanning-indian-evms.pdf)
Contrary to claims by Indian election authorities, these paperless EVMs suffer from
significant vulnerabilities. Even brief access to the machines could allow dishonest
election Insiders or other criminals to alter election results.
There are allegations that some insiders demanding vast sums (Rs. 5 Crore or more
for each assembly constituency) to fix election results. Who are these insiders? Unlike
in the traditional ballot system where only the election officials were the insiders,
electronic voting machine regime has spawned a long chain of insiders, all of whom are
outside the ambit and control of the Election Commission of India. There is every
possibility that some of these insiders are involved in murky activities in fixing
elections. The whole worldexcept us in Indiais alive to the dangers of insider fraud in
elections. The insiders include the public sector manufacturers of Indias electronic
voting machines namely, the Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL) and Electronics
Corporation of India (ECIL), the foreign companies supplying microcontrollers, private
players (some of which are allegedly owned by some political leaders) for carrying out
checking and maintenance of electronic voting machines during elections.
(http://www.indianevm.com/articles/ten-reasons-for-banning-indian-evms.pdf)
A team of researchers showed precisely how a display component could be replaced
with a fake substitute programmed to steal a percentage of the votes in favour of a
chosen candidate. They also demonstrated how stored votes could be changed
between the election and the public counting session, which in India, can be weeks
later, with a pocket-sized device. The team, comprising Hyderabad-based NetIndia, Dr J
Alex Halderman, professor & noted expert on electronic voting security from the
University of Michigan and Holland-based security expert Rop Gonggrijp, was
instrumental in the ban on EVMs in the Netherlands.
4. Which candidate to favour -Once the dishonest display is installed in an EVM
(possibly months or years before the election), the attacker must communicate which
candidate is to be favoured or disfavoured and by what margin. There are many
different ways that attackers could send such a signalvarious kinds of radios, secret
combinations of key presses, or even by using the number of candidates on the ballot.
2. Stealing of Votes To steal votes, the attacker indicates his favoured candidate using
the rotary switch, which selects a number from 09, and the attacker can use it to pick a
favoured candidate in any of the first 9 ballot positions, which normally include the major
national parties. When the switch is set to positions 1-9, the chip on the clip-on device

executes a vote-stealing programme . The programme runs in two passes: first, it reads
the list of votes and calculates how many votes to steal from each candidate, and
second, it rewrites the list of votes, stealing votes as calculated in the first phase. Any
time between the start of polling and the public count, dishonest election insiders or
other criminals could use the clip-on device to change the votes recorded in the EVM. In
India, counting sometimes takes place weeks after voting, so criminals could wait for an
opportunity to tamper with the machines while they are in storage. In normal operation,
the EVM limits the rate of voting to no more than
5 per minute. However, Clip-on device bypasses the software restrictions of the EVM,
so an attacker is able to again forcibly take control of an EVM and stuff the electronic
ballot box with any number of votes. These attacks are neither complicated nor difficult
to perform, but they would be hard to detect or defend against.
3. Dishonest insiders or other criminals with physical access to the machines at any
time before ballots are counted can insert malicious hardware that can steal votes for
the lifetime of the machines. Attackers with physical access between voting and
counting can arbitrarily change vote totals and can learn which candidate each voter
selected.
4 The EVM has no means for the voter to verify that his/her votes have been tallied
properly.
5. The EVM has no means outside of the memories of the voting machines themselves
to audit or recount the votes.
6. Susceptibility to fraud: Although some may believe that tampering with an electronic
voting machine is extremely hard to do, computer scientists have tampered with
machines to prove that it is quite easily done. If people have access to the machines,
and know how to work them, they can take the memory card out of the machine, which
stores the votes, and in place they put their own memory card with a virus that can
tamper with the votes
7. Government ties of manufacturers: The Government at the time of election may
hire any manufacturer or company for manufacturing EVMs according to the needs of
the political party in power An EVM can be tampered during manufacturing stage, that
too during the manufacturing of the Chip. After tampering the EVM, its difficult to detect
it by a third party. When the tampering happens at the manufacturing stage of chip,
even those who are assembling the EVMs will not be aware of and cannot detect
tampering .
8. Malicious software programming: Any computer software is basically generated
from software programming and coding. And all these soft wares could be tampered
with by a computer programmer who knows the source code. Testing electronic voting
systems for security problems, especially if they were intentionally introduced and
concealed, is basically impossible. If malicious coding is inserted by programmers into
commercial software that are triggered by obscure combinations of commands and
keystrokes via the computer keyboard, then election results can change completely.

9.

Physical security of machines:

10. Secure storage of cast votes: The votes that are cast using the electronic voting
machines, are stored in a safe storage or space in the computer machine memory. The
time gap between election and the counting of votes is a risk to possible hacking and
manipulation . The chance of tampering increases as the time gap increases.
Why do other countries rejected EVMs ?
Several countries in the world rejected Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) because
they are difficult to secure, easily subject to manipulation and open to large scale fraud
and pose a serious threat for free, fair and transparent elections in democratic societies.
EVMs are allowed in most states of the US only with a paper back up. Indian EVMs do
not produce a paper trail, which is a major drawback . Potential dangers of vote fraud
and more importantly, lack of transparency and verifiability associated with them
prompted ban or restrictions of their use. Developed nations like the United Kingdom,
France, Japan and Singapore have so far stuck to voting on paper ballots, owing to their
simplicity, verifiability and voter confidence in the system. Some of the countries ho
have rejected EVMs are as follows :1. Ireland abandoned e-voting in 2006.
2. Italian Minister Giulano Amato stated, We decided to stop the electronic voting
machine. During the 2006 elections we experimented with the machines as a voting
system, and not a system that counts the sections, without any reference to the legally
valid votes. Let`s stick to voting and counting physically because less easy to falsify.
( Source of info: http://www.jasonkitcat.com/h/f/JDOM/blog/1/?be_id=320)
3. California Secretary of State Kevin Shelley banned EVMs in the November 2004
elections as certain security conditions were not met with. Verifiable paper trail & certain
security conditions need to be implemented. People want elections results that can be
physically verified. (http://www.wvcag.org/news/fair_use/2004/07_01e.htm)
4. Germany`s Supreme Court ruled in March 2009 that e-voting was unconstitutional.
5. In the Netherlands, in 2006, licenses of 1,187 EVMs were withdrawn after citizen
group `We do not trust voting machines` showed they could hack into EVMs in 5
minutes from up to 40 metres without the knowledge of voters or election officials. The
nation will return to paper voting. (Publication: ComputerWorld, Dt: 19-05-2008, Author:
Andreas Udo de Haes)
6. Supreme Court of Finland declared the result of pilot electronic voting machines
invalid in the municipal corporation elections of 2009.
After Hugo Chvez won the 2004 election in Venezuela, it came out that the
government owned 28 percent of Bizta, the company that manufactured the voting
machines. The CIA has reported vote-rigging schemes in Venezuela, Macedonia and

Ukraine and a raft of concerns about EVMs & tampering. Stigall who studied electronic
systems in about 36 countries said that most countries` machines produced paper
receipts that voters then dropped into boxes. However, even that doesn`t prevent
corruption. ( http://www.mcclatchydc.com/226/story/64711.html)
Should India also ban EVMs?
Speed of election results is obviously an attraction for the EVMs. But saving democracy
is more critical than saving election costs or gain in efficiency. Numerous EVM rigging
allegations have been made by many prominent personalities.
EVMs were manipulated during the poll which resulted in defeat of many Congress
candidates, IANS quoted Congress general secretary Ghulam Nabi Azad as saying
soon after his party`s defeat in Orissa in July 2009.
LK Advani has demanded a paper back-up to electronic voting. Parties such as CPM,
TDP, AIADMK, RJD, LJP and Trinamool Congress have joined the chorus.
In 2001, Capt. Amarinder Singh, Punjab Pradesh Congress Committee alleged that
EVMs can be tampered with.( ttp://www.tribuneindia.com/2001/20010312/main4.htm
In 2009, Chandrababu Naidu blamed the EVMs for his defeat.
( http://www.deccanchronicle.com/hyderabad/now,-naidu-blames-evms-720
In 2009, AIADMK urged the EC to revert back to paper ballots, saying that EVMs were
rigged in Lok Sabha polls
(http://www.thehindu.com/2009/05/28/stories/2009052850110100.htm)
When the Indian National Congress surpassed all projections to win 262 seats in
2009, According to Dr. Subramanian Swamy, President of the Janata Party (24-82010) , the Leader of Indian National Congress Mrs. Sonia Gandhi reportedly hired
hackers to hack into election results of the electronic voting machines, which resulted in
landslide victory of the Indian National Congress in the national elections in 2009.
(Electronic Voting Machine: Excellent tool of manipulation- by News Desk, December
17, 2011-http://www.weeklyblitz.net/1993/electronic-voting-machine-excellent-tool)
In 2004, the Hon. Kerala High Court has asked EC to consider representation seeking
changes in the EVMs. to consider suggestions of Prof. Satinath Choudhary and
address issues concerning possible tampering of EVMs
( http://www.thehindu.com/2009/05/27/stories/2009052751030200.htm
On 1st December, 2010, Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina of Bangladesh announced
that there will be full electronic voting system in Bangladesh to arrange the future
elections in a flawless manner. But there are serious allegations that a group of
election planners of the ruling party has already contacted a number of leading EVM
hackers in India, including the most infamous Cyber Army. According to unconfirmed
sources, the ruling party influential figures from Bangladesh are already bargaining a
package deal with the Indian hackers in ensuring a massive victory and re-election of
Bangladesh Awami League during the election in 2014 in exchange of a huge amount

of money. Initially, the Indian hackers demanded US$ 1 billion for this service; while the
figure has already been brought down to US$ 400 million and the ruling party men are
optimistic of getting even a cheaper deal with the Indian hackers. Once the deal will be
successfully concluded, there will be visibly no way in stopping the ruling party from
getting re-elected in the election of 2014. Bangladesh has indigenously developed its
own electronic voting machines. Bangladesh University of Engineering & Technology
(BUET) has developed these systems. (http://www.indianevm.com/blogs/?cat=3 )

JUDGES NOT ANSWERING

FOLLOWING QUESTIONS
APPLICATION FOR INFORMATION AS PER RTI ACT 2005
( SEE RULE 22 OF RTI ACT 2005 )

FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.

ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.,

EDITOR , SOS E-VOICE JUSTICE & SOS E-CLARION OF DALIT ,
# LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,
HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,
HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA PIN 570017.

We salute honest few in public service , our whole hearted respects to

them. HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN
STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS WHICH IN ITSELF
( ie answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH I AM
SEEKING NOT THE OPINIONS ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT
YOUR OFFICIAL STAND , LEGAL STAND ON ISSUES WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT
OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE VIOLATING PEOPLES FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS &
HUMAN RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE HIGHEST RESPECTS FOR JUDICIARY & ALL

PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN APPEAL FOR TRUTH , INFORMATION SO

THAT TO APPREHEND CORRUPT FEW IN PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE AIDING &
ABETTING TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD & CRIMINALS.
M/s Karnataka Telecables Ltd , Mysore renamed as M/s RPG Telecom
Ltd again renamed as M/s RPG Cables Ltd once again renamed as M/s KEC
International , Mysore used to manufacture PIJF & OFC telecables
and supplied it to department of telecommunications , government of india ,
Indian Railways and GAIL , PGCIL of Ministry of Petroleum . DOT used to
pay hundreds of crores of rupees from public exchequer to buy these
cables . There is also one more company by name M/s Concepta Cables Ltd ,
Mysore belonging to the same industrial group supplying PIJF &
OFC telecables to DOT. As a public , as a citizen of india and as a tax payer I
want to know whether those crores of rupees from public exchequer are well
spent.

1. How many times the above said companies were blacklisted by DOT ,
Supreme Court of India and other quasi judicial bodies , casewise ?
2. What action taken by DOT & judicial bodies against the above
companies , casewise ?
3. How many cable kms of cable supplied by above companies , were
rejected by DOT from the field yearwise , since 1986 ?
4. Did the above companies replace all the cables rejected by DOT & make
good all the losses , yearwise ?
5. If not , why ?
6. What action taken by DOT , casewise ?
7. How many cable kms of cables supplied by above
companies were accepted on deviation by DOT yearwise ? on what
basis ?
8. Has the DOT authorised usage of recycled materials in the
manufacture of cables ?
9. If yes , on what basis ?
10. Did DOT authorize outsourcing of cable manufacturing
process by above companies to third parties , casewise ?
11. How many cable kms of telecom cables supplied by above
companies have failed during usage within the warranty period ,
yearwise ?
12. Did the above companies honour warranty contract in all such
cases ?
13. If not why , casewise ?

14. What action by DOT , casewise ?

YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : MAJORITY OF DOCUMENTS PERTAINS

TO YEAR 1994-2014 . SOME OF THE DOCUMENTS ARE DATED BACK TO 1986.

PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER FROM WHOM INFORMATION IS REQUIED :

CPIO , MINISTRY OF TELECOMMUNICATION & INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGY , GOVERNMENT OF INDIA , LOKSABHA , NEW DELHI.

FEES PAID : IPO 22F 282813 for rupees ten only

DATE : 29.03.2014 ..NAGARAJA.M.R.

PLACE : MYSORE , INDIA.. .( APPLICANT)

APPLICATION FOR INFORMATION AS PER RTI ACT 2005

( SEE RULE 22 OF RTI ACT 2005 )

FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.

ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.,

EDITOR , SOS E-VOICE JUSTICE & SOS E-CLARION OF DALIT ,
# LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,
HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,
HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA PIN 570017.

We salute honest few in public service , our whole hearted respects to

them. HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN
STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS WHICH IN ITSELF
( ie answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH I AM
SEEKING NOT THE OPINIONS ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT
YOUR OFFICIAL STAND , LEGAL STAND ON ISSUES WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT
OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE VIOLATING PEOPLES FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS &
HUMAN RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE HIGHEST RESPECTS FOR JUDICIARY & ALL
PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN APPEAL FOR TRUTH , INFORMATION SO
THAT TO APPREHEND CORRUPT FEW IN PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE AIDING &
ABETTING TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD & CRIMINALS. I HAVE SHOWN IN
DETAIL WITH LIVE , ACTUAL CASES , EXAMPLES , HOW INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM
IS MANIPULATED BY CRIMINALS WITHIN JUDICIARY , POLICE ,
PROSECUTION , ETC. READ DETAILS AT :
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-cover-up-land-scams ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/land-grabbers-in-m-u-d-a ,

Main A :
1. The land encroachments & illegal buildings and its continued
existence since years is not possible without tacit ,
covert support of jurisdictional revenue officials. What disciplinary
action has been taken against concerned officials with respect to each
case of land encroachment & illegal buildings , case wise ?
2. If not , why ?
3.

Is not land AKRAMA SAKRAMA SCHEME itself illegal ?

4. Is not the move of government of Karnataka to legalise land

encroachments & illegal buildings , in itself illegal ?
5. Till date in some cases of land encroachers are evicted & some
buildings violating building byelaws demolished , you could have spared
them to enjoy the benefit of land akrama sakrama scheme. Why you didnt
spare them ?
6. Is this scheme applicable for only chosen few ?
7. Does this scheme also benefit rich people above BPL ?
8. Does this scheme also benefit big land developers , land developing

companies ?
9. To my previous RTI appeals to MUDA , BDA only partial information
was given , conveniently hiding the truth. Is it not violation of RTI act ?
10. Does not hiding information about land crimes , in itself also a crime ?
11. I have shown in detail some land crimes in Karnataka. What action by
government of Karnataka , casewise ?
12. https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-cover-up-landscams ,
13. https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/land-grabbers-in-m-ud-a ,
14. Does not hiding a land crime , embolden land grabber to commit more
land crimes ?

Main B : RTI QUESTIONS Mysore DC , COMMISSIONER OF MUDA ( MYSORE

URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ) & COMMISSIONER OF MCC
( MYSORE CITY CORPORATION ) ARE AFRAID TO ANSWER
1. how many times since 1987 , MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT has revised /
modified the mysore city's comprehensive city development plan ?
2. how many cases of CDP violations were registered by MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ?
3. how many cases of CDP violations were legalized in the CDP revision /
modification by the authorities ?
4. when an application for alienation of land is made to you , say from civic
amenity site to commercial , what norms are followed by MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT ?
5. how do you provide alternate civic amenity site in the locality , if the area is
already full ? do you deprive people of civic amenities ?
6. during such alenation , is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT collecting market
rate difference between civic amenity site & commercial site ? if not why ?
7. in mysore city , many building complexes , buildings have been built fully
violating building bye-laws no set off , no parking space , no emergency fire exit
, no earthquake tolerant . what action by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT ?
8. how many cases of building bye-laws violations has been registered by MUDA /
MCC / GOVERNMENT since 1987 ? what is the action status report yearwise ?

9. how much of MUDA's / MCC's / GOVERNMENT's lands , sites , buildings &

houses have been illegally occupied by criminal tresspassers since 1987 ?
10. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT registered criminal cases against each
such illegal occupation ? if not why ? provide status report yearwise ?
11. in how many cases of such illegal occupation MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT
has legalized , regularized such illegal occupation just through MUDA's / MCC's
resolution instead of of reallotting the same through public notification to the
next senior most in the waiting list , after giving notice of allotment cancellation
to original allottee ? if not done so why ?
12. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT followed all legal norms in reallotment
of lands , sites , houses , etc to the illegal occupiers ? what is the procedure
followed ?
13. in mysore city , numerous housing societies & real estate Developers have
mushroomed , Land allotments of how many housing societies , real estate firms
among them are legally authorized by MUDA , MCC , GOVERNMENT & how many
not ? since 1987 till date ?
14. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT filed criminal complaints against such
illegal housing societies & illegal real estate firms ? if not why ?
15. what action MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT has initiated against real estate
firms & housing societies who have violated MUDA norms , layout plans , etc ? if
not why ?
16. the government has framed building bye-laws like width of road , space for
civic amenities , parking space , emergency fire exit , etc keeping high in the mind
safety of people first. MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT is in the practice of levying a
pittance as penalty on the building byelaw violators , layout Development plan
violators & legalizing those
violations. Safety of public & amenities of public are totally neglected by MUDA /
MCC / GOVERNMENT . When public people die , suffer injuries / accidents say
during a fire tragedy in a complex due to lack of fire exit , when people park
vehicles on pavement in front of a business complex as the complex doesn't have
a parking space of it's own , the pedestrians going that way are forced to come
down on road resulting in accidents , injuries & deaths . is not the MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT responsible for those accidents , injuries & deaths ?
17. what is the criteria adopted by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT for out of Turn
allotment of Lands , sites , houses to renowned sports persons , judges ,
journalists , politicians , artists , etc ?

18. how many judges , artists , politicians , journalists , sports persons , etc have
benefited from these out of turn allotments by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT ?
specific figures yearwise since 1987 ?
19. what action has been taken against developers , housing societies , who have
violated MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT norms ?
20. when poor scheduled caste , scheduled tribe people , minority people illegally
live On MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT sites building temporary huts , MUDA /
AUTHORITIES with the help of police razes down those huts & evicts the poor by
brute force. Whereas , when cronies of political bigwigs illegally occupy MUDA ,
MCC / GOVERNMENT lands worth crores of rupees & build big complexes
earning thousands of rupees monthly rent , MUDA or authorities not even files
police complaint against them instead regularizes the illegal occupation by
levying a pittance as fine. Why this double standard by MUDA / MCC
GOVERNMENT ?
21. HOW MANY CASES OF ILLEGAL OCCUPATIONS are regularized by MUDA /
MCC / GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ? yearwise figures ?
22. how much of MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT lands , sites , houses are under
illegal occupation ? status report yearwise since 1987 ?
23. how much of those has been recovered ? has the MUDA ,AUTHORITIES
recovered the rents earned by illegal occupation ?
24. have you filed police complaints against those criminals tresspassers ? if
not why ?
25. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT giving wide publicity & sufficient time to
bidders about it's auction schedules ?
26. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT giving market value to land loosers ?
27. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT exactly using the acquired lands , for the
same purpose mentioned in the project plan ?
28. is the MUDA / AUTHORITIES acquiring lands at lower rates from farmers &
selling it at a premium , by way making profits just like a real estate agency ?
29. in villages , there are cattle grazing grounds meant for the usage of whole
villagers, forest for the usage of whole village , lands belonging to village
temples. Some villagers have donated their personal lands to village temples ,
cattle grazing for the benefit of whole villagers. All the villagers are stake

holders , owners of such lands. When MUDA / MCC /

GOVERNMENT acquires such lands to whom does it pay compensation ? what
about welfare objectives of those lands ?
30. till date , how many lakes , ponds , how many feeder canals have been
closed , filled with mud , developed , sold as sites , etc by MUDA MCC or other
land developers ?
31. has the MUDA , MCC taken alternate steps to create new lakes , ponds ? how
many are created till date ?
32. in & around mysore city , high tension electric lines are there in busy
residential areas . as per Indian electricity act , no permanent structures should
be under the HT lines. However there are buildings under it. In some places , HT
lines runs in the middle of the road. The authorities Have developed those areas
beneath HT lines as parks , rented out
advertisement spaces & built permanent fencing of those areas spending lakhs of
taxpayer's money. This fencing obstructs the movement of service personnel of
electricity board , to service HT line. Are all these structures under
& surrounding HT lines legal ?
33. till date how many burial grounds are acquired & sold as sites by MUDA / MCC
/ GOVERNMENT or other developers ? specific figures yearwise since 1987
castewise , religionwise ?
34. in & around mysore city , in how many areas developed by MUDA & private
developers , the sewage water generated in those areas is directly let into lake ,
ponds ?
35. how many tributaries , lakes , ponds are killed in this fashion by MUDA , MCC
& other developers , housing societies ?
36. how many business complexes , flats , residential layouts developed by
private real estate developers , housing societies are dumping the sewage , /
waste generated in their buildings , into unauthorized dumping grounds , lakes ,
etc . thus disturbing the environment & creating public health hazard ? how the
MUDA / MCC is monitoring sewage / waste disposal ? status report yearwise
since 1987 till date .
37. how many unauthorized housing layouts are there in & around mysore city ?
what action by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT against them ? action taken report
yearwise since 1987 till date .
38. around mysore city , vast areas of village farm lands , agricultural lands are
acquired by private real estate developers for non agricultural purposes by a

single firm or single owner. Are these actions legal ? some of these real estate
agents have sold those lands to private industries , multinational companies for
crores of rupees. Has the MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT given alienation of land ie conversion from agricultural to
industrial usage. Has KIADB given consent to it ?
39. can a single individual / firm can purchase such vast tracts of agricultural
lands , is it legal ? is it within the KIADB's
comprehensive industrial area development plan ?
40. has the MUDA / MCC , KIADB given wide publicity , public notice calling for
objections before alienation of such lands ?
41. are all those alienations , strictly in conformance to MUDA's / MCC's CDP &
KIADB's industrial area development plan ? violations how many ?
42. is the MUDA & KIADB revising / modifying CDP & INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT PLAN , to suit those real estate developers & Private
companies ? on what legal grounds ?
43.what action has been taken based on mysore district magistrate mr.T.M.Vijaya
Bhaskar's report on land grabbings in mysore ?
44.in mysore city , hebbal-hootagalli industrial area , a lake has been destroyed
while building kaynes hotel , hinkal lake is shrinking , lake in front of BEML
Quarters has been alloted to M/S THRILLER CLOTHING CO, are all these actions
legal & in conformance to MUDA's CDP ? if not why ? what action ?
45. while auctioning off the lands of sick industrial unit M/S IDEAL JAWA LTD ,
was there any pre-qualification to bidders that after purchase of lands only it
must be used for industrial use or only industries can participate in the bidding
process ?
46.why not it has been clearly mentioned in the tender document that , said land
is open for alienation ?
47. about this issue , our publication has even raised it's objections , in it's
newspaper . no action , why ? as a result , the government , banks , employees
were cheated off their dues & the private firm made huge profits. is this auction &
alienation legal ?
48.numerous NGO's , trusts promoted by religious bodies , mutts are allotted
prime lands at preferrential rates , for the reason that they will use it for public /

social welfare. however many of the trusts are using the whole or part of the land
for commercial purposes other than the stated public / social welfare purpose.
what action has been taken by MUDA , MCC or government in such cases ?
49.how many trusts have violated government norms in this way since 1987 till
date? what action taken by MUDA , MCC & government action taken report
yearwise since 1987 till date ?
50.how many such illegalities / violations by trusts are regularized by MUDA ,
MCC or authorities , on what legal grounds ? ATR since 1987 till date ?
51.before regularizing such violations have you sought public objections & given
media publicity ? if not why ?
52.how you are monitoring the net wealth growth of some MUDA / MCC /
REVENUE officials & their family members , who have land acquisition /
denotifying , land usage conversion authorities ?
53.how many trusts , NGOs are allotted prime residential / commercial lands by
MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT on lease basis , in turn the said trusts , NGOs have
sulet it either partly or wholly to others ?
54.how many such lease allotments are sold by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT
before the expiry of lease period , without public auction ?
55. what are the norms followed by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT for the sale of
leased lands to the lessee before the expiry of lease period ?

Main C : RTI QUESTIONS COMMISSIONER OF BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT

AUTHORITY ( BDA ) , COMMISSIONER , BRIHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA
PALIKE ( BBMP ) & CHAIRMAN , KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT BOARD ( KIADB) ARE AFRAID TO ANSWER
1. how many times since 1987 , BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT has
revised / modified the Bangalore city's comprehensive city development plan ?
2. how many cases of CDP violations were registered by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ?
3. how many cases of CDP violations were legalized in the CDP revision /
modification by the authorities ?

4. when an application for alienation of land is made to you , say from civic
amenity site to commercial , what norms are followed by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT?
5. how do you provide alternate civic amenity site in the locality , if the area is
already full ? do you deprive people of civic amenities ?
6. during such alenation , is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT collecting
market rate difference between civic amenity site & commercial site ? if not why ?
7. in bangalore city , many building complexes , buildings have been built fully
violating building bye-laws no set off , no parking space , no emergency fire exit
, no earthquake tolerant . what action by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT?
8. how many cases of building bye-laws violations has been registered by BDA /
BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT since 1987 ? what is the action status report
yearwise ?
9. how much of BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT lands , sites , buildings &
houses have been illegally occupied by criminal tresspassers since 1987 ?
10. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT registered criminal cases
against each such illegal occupation ? if not why ? provide status report yearwise
?
11. in how many cases of such illegal occupation BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT has legalized , regularized such illegal occupation just through
BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT ` s resolution instead of of re-allotting the
same through public notification to the next senior most in the waiting list , after
giving notice of allotment cancellation to original allottee ? if not done so why ?
12. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT followed all legal norms in
reallotment of lands , sites , houses , etc to the illegal occupiers ? what is the
procedure followed ?
13. in bangalore city , numerous housing societies & real estate Developers have
mushroomed , Land allotments of how many housing societies , real estate firms
among them are legally authorized by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT &
how many not ? since 1987 till date ?
14. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT filed criminal complaints
against such illegal housing societies & illegal real estate firms ? if not why ?
15. what action BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT has initiated against real
estate firms & housing societies who have violated BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /

GOVERNMENT norms , layout plans , etc ? if not why ?

16. the government has framed building bye-laws like width of road , space for
civic amenities , parking space , emergency fire exit , etc keeping high in the mind
safety of people first. BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT is in the practice of
levying a pittance as penalty on the building byelaw violators , layout
Development plan violators & legalizing those violations. Safety of public &
amenities of public are totally neglected by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT. When public people die , suffer injuries / accidents say during a
fire tragedy in a complex due to lack of fire exit , when people park vehicles on
pavement in front of a business complex as the complex doesn't have a parking
space of it's own , the pedestrians going that way are forced to come down on
road resulting in accidents , injuries & deaths . is not the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT responsible for those accidents , injuries & deaths ?
17. what is the criteria adopted by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT for out
of Turn allotment of Lands , sites , houses to renowned sports persons , judges ,
journalists , politicians , artists , etc ?
18. how many judges , artists , politicians , journalists , sports persons , etc have
benefited from these out of turn allotments by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT? specific figures yearwise since 1987 ?
19. what action has been taken against developers , housing societies , who have
violated BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT norms ?
20. when poor scheduled caste , scheduled tribe people , minority people illegally
live On BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT sites building temporary huts ,
BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT with the help of police razes down those
huts & evicts the poor by brute force. Whereas , when cronies of political bigwigs
illegally occupy BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT lands worth crores of
rupees & build big complexes earning thousands of rupees monthly rent , BDA /
BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT or authorities not even files police complaint
against them instead regularizes the illegal occupation by levying a pittance as
fine. Why this double standard by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT?
21. HOW MANY CASES OF ILLEGAL OCCUPATIONS are regularized by BDA /
BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ? yearwise figures ?
22. how much of BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT lands , sites , houses are
under illegal occupation ? status report yearwise since 1987 ?
23. how much of those has been recovered ? has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT arecovered the rents earned by illegal occupation ?

24. have you filed police complaints against those criminals tresspassers ? if
not why ?
25. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT giving wide publicity &
sufficient time to bidders about it's auction schedules ?
26. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT giving market value to land
loosers ?
27. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT exactly using the acquired lands
, for the same purpose mentioned in the project plan ?
28. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT acquiring lands at lower rates
from farmers & selling it at a premium , by way making profits just like a real
estate agency ?
29. in villages , there are cattle grazing grounds meant for the usage of whole
villagers, forest for the usage of whole village , lands belonging to village
temples. Some villagers have donated their personal lands to village temples ,
cattle grazing for the benefit of whole villagers. All the villagers are stake
holders , owners of such lands. When BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT
acquires such lands to whom does it pay compensation ? what about welfare
objectives of those lands ?
30. till date , how many lakes , ponds , how many feeder canals have been
closed , filled with mud , developed , sold as sites , etc by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT or other land developers ?
31. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT taken alternate steps to create
new lakes , ponds ? how many are created till date ?
32. in & around bangalore city , high tension electric lines are there in busy
residential areas . as per Indian electricity act , no permanent structures should
be under the HT lines. However there are buildings under it. In some places , HT
lines runs in the middle of the road. The authorities Have developed those areas
beneath HT lines as parks , rented out advertisement spaces & built permanent
fencing of those areas spending lakhs of taxpayer's money. This fencing
obstructs the movement of service personnel of electricity board , to service HT
line. Are all these structures under & surrounding HT lines legal ?
33. till date how many burial grounds are acquired & sold as sites by BDA /
BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT or other developers ? specific figures yearwise
since 1987 castewise , religionwise ?
34. in & around bangalore city , in how many areas developed by BDA / BBMNP /

KIADB / GOVERNMENT & private developers , the sewage water generated in

those areas is directly let into lake , ponds ?
35. how many tributaries , lakes , ponds are killed in this fashion by BDA / BBMNP
/ KIADB / GOVERNMENT & other developers , housing societies ?
36. how many business complexes , flats , residential layouts developed by
private real estate developers , housing societies are dumping the sewage , /
waste generated in their buildings , into unauthorized dumping grounds , lakes ,
etc . thus disturbing the environment & creating public health hazard ? how the
BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT is monitoring sewage / waste disposal ?
status report yearwise since 1987 till date .
37. how many unauthorized housing layouts are there in & around bangalore
city ? what action by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT against them ?
action taken report yearwise since 1987 till date .
38. around bangalore city , vast areas of village farm lands , agricultural lands are
acquired by private real estate developers for non agricultural purposes by a
single firm or single owner. Are these actions legal ? some of these real estate
agents have sold those lands to private industries , multinational companies for
crores of rupees. Has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT given alienation
of land ie conversion from agricultural to industrial usage. Has KIADB given
consent to it ?
39. can a single individual / firm can purchase such vast tracts of agricultural
lands , is it legal ? is it within the KIADB's comprehensive industrial area
development plan ?
40. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT given wide publicity , public
notice calling for objections before alienation of such lands ?
41. are all those alienations , strictly in conformance to BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT's industrial area development plan ? violations how many ?
42. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT revising / modifying CDP &
INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN , to suit those real estate developers &
Private companies ? on what legal grounds ?
43.what action has been taken based on mysore district magistrate mr.T.M.Vijaya
Bhaskar's report on land grabbings in mysore ?
44.in mysore city , hebbal-hootagalli industrial area , a lake has been destroyed

while building kaynes hotel , hinkal lake is shrinking , lake in front of BEML
Quarters has been alloted to M/S THRILLER CLOTHING CO, are all these actions
legal & in conformance to MUDA's CDP ? if not why ? what action ?
45. while auctioning off the lands of sick industrial unit M/S IDEAL JAWA LTD ,
was there any pre-qualification to bidders that after purchase of lands only it
must be used for industrial use or only industries can participate in the bidding
process ?
46.why not it has been clearly mentioned in the tender document that , said land
is open for alienation ?
47. about this issue , our publication has even raised it's objections , in it's
newspaper . no action , why ? as a result , the government , banks , employees
were cheated off their dues & the private firm made huge profits. is this auction &
alienation legal ?
48.numerous NGO's , trusts promoted by religious bodies , mutts are allotted
prime lands at preferrential rates , for the reason that they will use it for public /
social welfare. however many of the trusts are using the whole or part of the land
for commercial purposes other than the stated public / social welfare purpose.
what action has been taken by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT in such
cases ?
49.how many trusts have violated government norms in this way since 1987 till
date? what action taken by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT action taken
report yearwise since 1987 till date ?
50.how many such illegalities / violations by trusts are regularized by BDA /
BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT, on what legal grounds ? ATR since 1987 till
date ?
51.before regularizing such violations have you sought public objections & given
media publicity ? if not why ?
52.how you are monitoring the net wealth growth of some BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT officials & their family members , who have land acquisition /
denotifying , land usage conversion authorities ?
53.how many trusts , NGOs are allotted prime residential / commercial lands by
BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT on lease basis , in turn the said trusts ,
NGOs have sulet it either partly or wholly to others ?

54.how many such lease allotments are sold by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT before the expiry of lease period , without public auction ?
55. what are the norms followed by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT for the
sale of leased lands to the lessee before the expiry of lease period ?
56. what is the status of house allotted to sri.chandrashekariah vide BDA
allotment letter no: 310/267/BDA/ADM/KMRSL(H)/78-79 dt 11/08/1978.
57. why BDA didn't file police complaint to evict encroachers?
58. why BDA didn't inform the descendents of original allottee about the
cancellation of their allotment ?
59.what happened to the money deposited by original allottee?
60.is the action of BDA allotting the said house to an illegal encroacher just by
the resolution of BDA committee legal ?
61. in case the BDA wished to re-allot the said house , first it must have informed
the original allottee about cancellation of allotment allowing them sufficient time
to reply with public notice in news papers , then they should have allotted the
said house to the senior most in the waiting list. But BDA has just allotted the
house to an illegal encroacher by the resolution of BDA committee. Is it legal ?
62. BDA officials gave half truths to my RTI request & stated that the said file
concerning this issue cann't be found ie lost . is it legal ?
63. has the BDA filed police complaint regarding theft of file from the record room
? HONOURABLE COMMISSIONER OF BDA PLEASE REFER THE FOLLOWING
ARTICLE.
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-cover-up-land-scams ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/land-grabbers-in-m-u-d-a ,

YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : MAJORITY OF DOCUMENTS PERTAINS

TO YEAR 1994-2014 . SOME OF THE DOCUMENTS ARE DATED BACK TO 1947.

PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER FROM WHOM INFORMATION IS REQUIED :

CPIO , MINISTRY OF REVENUE , GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA , VIDHANA
SOUDHA , BANGALORE

FEES PAID : IPO 22F 282812 for Rupees ten only

DATE : 29.03.2014 ..NAGARAJA.M.R.

PLACE : MYSORE , INDIA.. .( APPLICANT)

APPLICATION FOR INFORMATION AS PER RTI ACT 2005

( SEE RULE 22 OF RTI ACT 2005 )

FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.

ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.,

EDITOR , SOS E-VOICE JUSTICE & SOS E-CLARION OF DALIT ,
# LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,
HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,
HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA PIN 570017.

We salute honest few in public service , Judiciary , police , parliament &

state legislative assemblies. our whole hearted respects to them. HEREBY , I DO

HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO
THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE THE
INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH I AM SEEKING NOT THE OPINIONS
ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR OFFICIAL STAND , LEGAL
STAND ON ISSUES WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE
VIOLATING PEOPLES FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE
HIGHEST RESPECTS FOR JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN
APPEAL FOR TRUTH , INFORMATION SO THAT TO APPREHEND CORRUPT FEW
IN PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE AIDING & ABETTING TERRORISM ,
UNDERWORLD & CRIMINALS. I HAVE SHOWN IN DETAIL WITH LIVE , ACTUAL
CASES , EXAMPLES , HOW INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM IS MANIPULATED BY
CRIMINALS WITHIN JUDICIARY , POLICE , PROSECUTION , ETC. READ
DETAILS AT :
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police ,
Atrocities on Women by JUDGES
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/atrocities-by-judges

A Z of Manipulation of Indian Legal System

http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-Legal-System ,
http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal ,

Justice Sathasivam - Are you DEAF DUMB & BLIND

https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/justice-sathasivam---are-you-deaf-dumbblind ,
Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Cover-up
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rajiv-gandhi-assassination-cover-up ,
SHAME SHAME MPs & MLAs
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/shame-shame-mps-mlas ,

Hereby , we do request PIO O/O Honourable Chief Justice of India , PIO , O/O
H.E.Honorable President of India , PIO O/O Honorable Speaker of Lok Sabha , PIO
O/O Dy Chairman of Rajya Sabha , PIOs of Karnataka Raj Bhawan , Karnataka
CMO , Union Home Ministry GOI and DG & IG of Police of Government of
Karnataka to answer the following questions in public interest , for safeguarding
national security , National unity & integrity & to legally apprehend antinationals , criminals within the judiciary & police.
Main A :
1. What action you have taken against judges involved in atrocities
against women , casewise ? if not , why ?
2. What action you have taken against judges involved in land scams ,
casewise ? if not , why ?
3. I have shown with actual cases how manipulation / fixing takes place ,
from complaint filing to judicial pronouncement stage. Are the judges &
police , above law ?
4. I have numerous PILs , RTI appeals before supreme court of india. But
they were not registered , not honoured , why ?
5. To my legal notice / show cause notice / damage payment notice to
supreme court of india & chief justice of india , till date I have not received
the reply , why ?
6. Is it not the duty of supreme court of india to protect the life & liberty of
all Indian citizens ?
7. Is it not the failure of supreme court of india, when it failed to protect
the life of a complainant ?
8. By negligence of their duties , are not supreme court judges aiding &
abetting criminals , anti nationals & terrorists ?
9. While crores of Indians are barely surviving on a single piece meal a
day , people dying due to starvation , supreme court judges are getting
salary & perks amounting to lakhs of rupees from the same suffering
public / public exchequer. Are not those duty shirking judges ashamed ?
10. What action you have taken against judges involved in hushing up late
prime minister rajiv Gandhi assassination case ?
11. Why the supreme court of india didnt allow me to appear before it in
the said case of late PM Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case ?
12. Why the supreme court of india didnt protect my life , my job
oppurtunities , my newspaper from the wrath of criminal nexus ?
13. When even cable TV journalists , web journalists are getting PRESS /
MEDIA accreditation , my web news papers , myself are not getting PRESS

accreditation since 9 years , why ?

14. Are the supreme court judges hand in gloves with the criminal nexus ?

Main B :
You have not taken appropriate action to my previous RTI requests , Numerous
appeals for justice & police complaints. You have not replied to show-cause
notice also. Your inaction has helped the criminals in manipulating & destroying
evidences.

Your inaction / delay in performing your duties not only amounts to denial of
information , but amounts to violation of our fundamental & human rights ,
cover-up of crimes , aiding & abetting criminals . The criminal nexus tried to
silence me in many ways. Is not these acts of yours a crime in itself ?

If your acts of crime cover-ups , information / evidence cover-ups , aiding &

abetting criminals , silencing a crusader is just & legal. The same type of acts of
crimes performed by other citizens will also be legal ?

Main C :
At the outset , we express our whole hearted respects to all constitutional
institutions & to the honest few in public service. Contempt of constitutional
institutions , citizens of India is being made by the corrupt persons in
constitutional positions themselves. This is an appeal to the honest few in public
service , constitutional positions , to bring their corrupt colleagues to book.

1.
does the action of MPs , MLAs taking money / receiving favors from
vested interests , to formulate policy decisions , to raise questions in parliament /
legislative bodies or to abstain from voting legal ?
2.

why transparent , fair investigation is not done in such cases ?

3.
just remember , the vulgar acts of Mr.Bora Babu Singh in state
legislature & how some MLAs vulgarly behaved with Ms.Jayalalita in state
legislature , years ago. Are these type of vulgar actions by MPs & MLAs legal ?

does not these constitute contempt of the house by MPs & MLAs themselves ?
4.
all the peoples representatives from panchayath member to
president of India must read ABCD Of Democracy provide along with.since
independence of India till date , MPs & MLAs are forcing projects on people
against the wishes of people , formulating policies against the wishes of people.
Are not such projects , government policies & Laws , undemocratic & illegal ?
5.
is the election commission of India verifying the authenticity of
affidavits submitted by electoral candidates ?
6.
how many candidates have been caught so far for giving false
affidavits ? are all the violators prosecuted?
7.
are the MPs , MLAs submitting their wealth details on affidavits
yearly to vigilance authorities ? defaulters , violators how many ?
8.
what legal action taken against violators , defaulters , for giving false
affidavits ?
9.
, MLAs ?

who is checking the authenticity of those affidavits submitted by MPs

10.
the agricultural incomes of some MPs , MLAs , their kih & kin raises
even during the time of severe drought , floods , fall in prices of agricultural
products , their companies register increase in turnover / profits even during
recession , the trusts / NGOs set up by them receive huge donations. Are all
these income legal ?

Main D :
1.
we do once again offer our conditional services to the government of
india , all state governments & supreme court of india , in apprehending tax
evaders , land grabbers , corrupt police , corrupt judges , corrupt public servants
, labor law violators , etc. whom the the government officials , vigilance
authorities have failed to apprehend. Why the authorities , courts , supreme court
of India , are not ready to utilize our service ? are they afraid of being caught ?
2.
the public servants , courts theselves are delaying giving information
/ records to us in many cases. So in the issues / cases raised by us , the clause of
time bar doe not apply. Are these delaying tactics of public servants , courts legal
?

3.
why no proper , timely action was not taken based on numerous
police complaints made by us ?
4.
why DG & IGP , Government of Karnataka , has not made any efforts
to seek legal sanction for prosecution of VVIPs ( mentioned in our complaint ) ,
from union & state home ministries ?
5.
the criminal nexus is trying to silence me in many ways , but the
supreme court of India & national human rights commission has failed to undo
the injustices , why ? is it because it is not a high profile case ? is it because it is
not hi-fi , does not get image ratings , TRPs ?
6.
the public servants are aiding underworld , naxalites & terrorists , by
their delaying tactics & denial of information , records. What action has been
taken against such anti-national elements in public service ?
7.
how many complaints are made by Nagaraj .M.R. , Human Rights
Activist , Mysore (editor of SOS e-clarion of dalit & SOS e-voice for justice) to
Karnataka police , to national human rights commission to supreme court of
India till date ? what action taken with respect to each complaint ?
8.
the delay in taking action by public servants with respect to
following cases has resulted in more crimes , destruction / manipulation of
evidences , records and more injustices to commonman. Why the authorities did
not take timely action against criminals in following cases ?

SOS Appeal to SUPREME COURT of INDIA

http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2010/08/s-o-s-appeal-to-supreme-
DEALS IN COURTS & POLICE STATIONS READ :
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/satyameva-jayate ,
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2011/01/satyameva-jayate.html ,
ACCUSED Chief Justice of India
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/accused-chief-justice-of
,
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2011/02/accused-chief-justice-of
CROSS EXAM OF HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA , SUPREME COURT
OF
INDIA http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ ,

http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF UNION HOME SECRETARY , GOI , NEW DELHI
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF DG&IG OF POLICE , GOK , BANGALORE
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF GOVERNOR , RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/ , http://theftinrbi.rediffblogs.com/
, http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/
CROSS EXAM OF MUDA COMMISSIONER , MUDA , MYSORE
http://crimesofmuda.blogspot.com/ , http://manivannanmuda.blogspot.com/
, http://crimesatmudamysore.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF BDA COMMISSIONER , BDA , BANGALORE
http://crimesofbda.blogspot.com/ , http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/ ,
CORPORATE CRIMES RPG CABLES LIMITED
http://crimesatrpg.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesatrpg.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/218
MEGA FRAUD BY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196
are you ready to catch tax thieves ?
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196
MOBILE PHONES , CURRENCY SCANDALS
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196
reliance industry where is accountability ?
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196
crimes at infosys campus
http://crimeatinfy.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimeatinfy.wordpress.com/ ,

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/214
crimes by B.D.A against a poor woman
http://crimesofbda.blogpot.com/ ,
http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212
crimes of land mafia in India
http://landscamsinindia.blogspot.com/ ,
http://landscam.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212
currency thefts in RBI Press
http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/80
killer colas & killer medicines of India
http://deathcola.blogpot.com/ ,
http://deathcola.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/201
HONOR OF INDIAN PALIAMENT FOR SALE
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/honor-of-indian-parliament-for-sale
Persecuted IROM SHARMILA of Puttaparthi AP pushpa kolasani on hunger
strike in anantapur district jail Andhra Pradesh
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/persecuted-irom-sharmila-ofputtaparthi-ap

9.
how many judges are caught by authorities for doing improper ,
immoral & illegal acts , since independence till date ? what action taken in each
case ?
10.
what action taken against copy cat judges caught red handed while
copying in public examination in Andhra Pradesh ?
11.
have you reviewed all the previous judicial decisions taken by such
judges of doubtful integrity & honesty ?
12.
is it not the duty of government & supreme court of India , to protect
the fundamental rights & human rights of all Indian citizens ?

13.
why the government & supreme court of India has failed to protect the
fundamental rights & human rights of me & those mentioned in my complaint ?
14.
how many former CJIs , supreme court & high court judges have
disproportionate wealth ?
15.
Your denial of information to my previous RTI requests amounts to
suppression of evidence , hiding crimes , what action against erring public
servants ?
16.
why my previous RTI requests or part there of was not transferred to
appropriate authorities and information given to me in a consolidated form ?

Main E :
Q1. Why not death sentence to corrupt police who murder people in in lock-up /
fake encounters ?
Q2. Why not death sentence to corrupt police who apply 3 rd degree torture on
prisoners ?
Q3. Why not death sentence to corrupt police , who connive with criminals &
backstabs our motherland , its national security ?
Q4. Dont the police have suo-motto powers to take action in the interest of public
welfare , law & order ?
Q5. Daily we see numerous reports of misdeeds by police , public servants ,
industrialists , etc in the media . Then why not police taking any action with
respect to them ?
Q6. nowadays we see numerous reports of scams , scandals by constitutional
functionaries , public servants in the media. Instead of wasting money , killing
time by prolonging formation of parliamentary committees , judicial commissions
, why not subject those accussed public servants to narco analysis , lie deector
test , etc to ascertain truth & provide timely justice ?
Q7. If a commonman files a complaint , police / courts wants evidences ,
witnesses to take action against the rich & mighty crooks. Where as if a rich
person just gives a complaint against a poor chap , he is arrested , tortured
eventhough there are no evidences , witnesses. Why this double standard ?
Q8. If a poor chap tries to collect evidences as per his fundamental rights or as
per RTI ACT , the public servants dont give full , truthfull information. Still ,

police / courts dont take action against those public servants hiding crimes. Why
?
Q9.why I was not permitted to appear as an amicus curie before jain
commission of enquiry or supreme court of india probing late prime minister rajiv
Gandhi assassination case ?
Q10. The criminal nexus tried to silence me , by closing my news paper , by
snatching away my job oppurtunities in government service, by physically
assaulting me , by threatening me of false fix-ups in cases & by attempts to
murder me. But no action against culprits , why ?
Q11. Whereas , I was enquired number of times by police & intelligence personnel
about this case , but the culprits were not enquired even once , why ?
Q12.who compensates the losses I have suffered due to these injustices ? are not
police responsible for it ?
Q13. Is it not the duty of police to protect the lives , livelihood of witnesses & all
parties involved , both during case & afterwards ?
Q14. How do you monitor & check corrupt police personnel & increase in their
familys wealth year after year ?
Q15. While getting appointed into government service from the rank of peon to
IAS officer , police verification is mandatory. While appointing to sensitive
defense establishments , research institutes in addition to police verification ,
central intelligence agencies cross-check candidates background. However is
there no background checks of constitutional functionaries , MPs , MLAs , , who
are privy to national secrets ? why ?
Q16. Recently , the opposition parties have made allegations during presidential
allegations that close relative of one of the front running candidates have
swindled public money by their bank , misused public money through one of their
NGO. Is it true ?
Q17.has GOI funded any terrorist outfits in india or abroad ?
Q18.india preaches non-violence , panchasheel principles to the world. In india ,
more than half the population are poor , people are starving to death. Inspite
these background , GOI funded & aided terrorist outfits in former east Pakistan
ensuring the creation of Bangladesh , GOI has funded & aided terrorist outfits like
LTTE , TULF , ETC in srilanka , MQM in Pakistan. In turn these terrorist outfits
have murdered thousands of innocents in those countries. Are these acts of GOI
just & legal ? Is not GOI responsible for all those murders of innocents ? has GOI
paid any compensation to those victims or their family mebers ? why not ?
Q19.within india , to reduce the influence of certain terrorist groups , GOI has
funded & aided couter terrorist groups , is it right & legal ?
Q20. In Jharkhand , chattisgarh , etc , the government has armed , trained &
funded salwa judum to counter naxalites. Salwa judum cadres are terrorizing
innocents just like naxalites. Is this action of government just & legal ?
Q21.in india, TADA , POTA is being rampantly misused by police. Even where
there are no problems of terrorism , TADA / POTA is being slapped against
innocents , even children. In M.M.Hills of Karnataka state , STF personnel charged
tribal people with TADA on frivolous charges of taking lunch to veerappan ,

stiching dress for the forest brigand, etc. where as the prominent political, film ,
sports personalities who have links with underworld , anti national elements &
attended parties hosted by dawood Ibrahim , other dons in gulf countries , else
where. But these hi-fi people are not charged with TADA / POTA ? why ?
Q22. Film actor sanjay dutt had contacts with underworld & fully knowing well the
criminal objectives of criminals , hid the dangerous arms & ammunition in his
home , which were intended for terrorizing public. However mr.dutt is not charged
with TADA / POTA instead he is charged with illegal possession of arms act
( which is normally applied to farmers who use illegal home made guns to scare
away animals , birds in their farms ). Why this favourable treatment of mr.dutt by
police ? prosecution ? is this because dutt is politically mighty & rich ?
Q23. Law is one & same for all , the public servants, police interpretes , enforces
it differentially between rich & poor ? why this differentiation ?
Q24.recently in Bangalore police nabbed criminals belonging to international
criminal syndicate selling duplicate nokia mobiles. Every nokia mobile comes
with 15 digit IMEI number , this number is also used by police for tracking
criminals. In consumer dispute at consumer disputes redressal forum Mysore CD
49/05 , nokia company stated that all its products come with IMEI number only &
stated that the product in dispute sold by tata indicom dealer M/S INTOTO
COMMUNICATIONS , Mysore are not theirs as it doesnt have IMEI numbers.
Further nokia stated they dont have any business relationship with either tata
indicom or its dealer. However the tata indicom dealer stated that indeed his
products are genuine , first hand products , but doesnt have IMEI numbers . this
proves the dealer in collusion with tata company is selling illegal nokia mobile
hand sets & cheating the public. These mobiles are evading taxes , as well as
these are without IMEI numbers best buy for criminal elements who want to evade
police tracking. What police are doing
Q25. Who , of which rank among police personnel takes the decision to close a
case ie to file B report , when after certain time limit no leads are found in
investigation ?
Q26. How do you monitor corrupt police personnel , who purposefully fail to
investigate case properly , so that either the case can be closed with B report
or the prosecution fails to prove the case in court ?
Q27. Who among police takes the decision to appeal against the verdict of a
lower court , when the prosecution fails ?
Q28. Who took the decision , not to appeal against the argentina court order
acquitting mr.quatrochi accussed in bofors scandal ?
Q29. Do you treat all the prison convicts same in the prison or does the notorious
big time rich criminals get spacious barracks with tv, news paper , adequate
food , medical care , etc while small time criminals , poor are crammed into pig
sty like rooms with 60-70 inmates without any basic requirements ?
Q30. What is the status of my complaint made to the DG & IG of police ,
government of Karnataka on 10/12/2004 ? the copies of complaint was released at
press meet at patrakartara bhavan Mysore on same day, even copies were given
to police & intelligence personnel ?

Q31. Why no action , reply regarding the complaint till date ?

Q32. Our constitutional frame workers gave legal immunity privileges to certain
constitutional functionaries , so that they are not burdened with frivolous court
cases & can concentrate on their constitutional duties. But these privileges
doesnt cover the individual actions of those public servants like rape , murder ,
dowry harassment , tax evasion , misuse of office , etc. but still law enforcement /
police department is bound to send request to home ministry seeking permission
& home ministry sits over files for months. This gives the accussed ample time to
destroy evidences. Is it right & legal ?
Q33. Does legal immunity privileges cover their official actions alone ? if not what
does it cover ?
Q34. What is the time limit for home ministry to give sanction for the prosecution
of tainted constitutional functionaries ?
Q35. How many present MPs , MLAs , MUNICIAPAL CORPORATORS , other
peoples representatives are facing criminal charges ?
Q36. In the past , how many MPs , MLAs , corporators were facing criminal
charges , yearwise since 1987 ? how many of them were eventually convicted ?
Q37. How many MPs , MLAs , prominent film , sports personalities have have
contacts with underworld , foreign intelligence agencies ?
Q38. How many of them have attended frequent parties hosted by underworld
dons in gulf countries , else where ?
Q39. How many MP , MLA , other peoples representatives are wanted by police in
various cases . but shown in the police records as absconding but in reality are
attending the proceedings of the house as usual ?
Q40. When did smt. Sonia Gandhi became a citizen of india ? did she occupy any
public office before naturalization ?
Q41. In india , how many MPs , MLAs , MLCs are of foreign origin or have a
spouse of foreign origin ?
Q42. Does smt. Sonia Gandhi have citizenship of any other country ?
Q43. Did she occupy any public office while enjoying dual citizenship ?
Q44. How do you monitor public servants who have spouses of foreign origin &
while they are on foreign tour , from national security perspective ?
Q45. Is mr. M.S SUBBA member of parliament a citizen of india ?
Q46. What is the status of complaint made by former union minister
mr.subramanya swamy alleging that late P.M rajiv gandhis family received
money from foreign intelligence agencies ?
Q47. In many cases like mass riots involving certain political parties , when that
culprit party comes to power all the cases involving its partymen are withdrawn
by the government orelse prosecution fails to prove its case & prefers not to
appeal. Just remember Bombay riot case involving shiv sainiks & others , when
shiv sena BJP came to power in Maharashtra , all the cases against its
partymen were withdrawn. Are these type of decisions by government just & legal
?
Q48.what damages has been done to indias national security due to mole in the
PMO, as alleged by former union minister mr.natwar singh ?

Q49. What action by the government ?

Q50. How many Indians are in the custody of police / military in various foreign
countries ?
Q51. How many foreigners are there in Indian prisons ?
Q52. How GOI is protecting the human rights of these prisoners ?
Q53. Is the government paying any compensation to victims of police failures ,
fix-ups , , who suffer in jail for years & acquitted by courts upon finding them as
not guilty ?
Q54. Do you register murder charges / attempt to murder charges against guilty
police officers who are responsible for lock-up deaths , fake encounters &
3rd degree torture ?
Q55. How many cases has been filed since 1987 till date ?
Q56. What action has been taken against guilty police officers , STF personnel
who were responsible for gross human rights violations , 3rddegree torture , lockup deaths of innocents in forest brigand veerappans territory , based on justice
A.J.Sadashiva commission findings ? if not why ?
Q57. I , as a citizen of india as my fundamental duty hereby do offer my
conditional services to GOI & GOK to apprehend corrupt public servants. Are you
ready to utilize my services ?
Q58. Police personnel are always in the forefront of containing crimes , mass fury
, riots , etc. they suffer more & even their family members suffer threats from the
criminal elements. Do the government provide insurance coverage to police &
their family members on the lines of defense forces ?
Q59. What is the amount of coverage to a police constable & his family ?
Q60. Who makes the premium contributions ?
Q61. Do the government provide overtime allowance , food allowance to police
who daily work beyond 8 hours of duty ?
Q62. Is the government giving any training to police personnel in public
interaction , human rights ?
Q63. Is it right to post professionally trained police to sentry , orderly duties of
ministers ?
Q64. What is the ratio of police personnel to total population in india since 1987 ?
Q65. IS THE GOVERNMENT GIVING ADEQUATE FOOD, MEDICAL CARE ,
CLOTHING , LIVING SPACE TO PRISON INMATES , AS REQUIRED BY A NORMAL
HUMAN EING ACCORDING TO W.H.O NORMS ?
Q66. Is the forensic science department which conducts narcfo-analysis , liedetector test , etc under the control of police department ?
Q67. Is it not right to put it under impartial control of NHRC or like bodies ?
Q68. Is the action of some police officers arranging compromise meetings &
subtly insisting the poor to tow the line of rich or else face the consequences , is
it right & legal ? this happens mostly in real estate matters.
Q69. Did government make any ransom payments to forest brigand veerappan
during his various kidnappings ?
Q70. What action has been taken based on revealations by karim telgi during
narco analysis about public servants involvement ?

Q71. How many cases of allegations against judges were made in the media
about misuse of office , criminal acts by judges from munsiff court to supreme
court of India ? since 1947 till date
Q72. are the enquiry report findings, action taken reports of such cases
accessible to public ? if not why ?
Q73. what action has been taken against guilty judges ?
Q74. are the guilty judges legally prosecuted in all such cases ? or has it just
ended with their resignation from services or his superior judge not allotting him
any judicial work ?
Q75. why some high ranking judges are not legally prosecuted for their wrong
doings ?
Q76. are judges above law ? are not everybody equal before law ?
Q77. do the judiciary subject , all the cases handled by accussed / tainted , guilty
judges to review , to undo past unjust judgements ?
Q78. how ? if not why ?
Q79. how do the judiciary monitor the net wealth growth of some judges
including the wealth in the name of judges family members ?
Q80. do all the judges file their annual income , wealth statements on sworn
affidavits to the higher judiciary ? defaulters how many ?
Q81. how does the judiciary verifies those statements ?
Q82. is such statements made public , on web ?
Q83. when the judgement of a lower court is turned down by the higher court ,
what action is initiated against lower court judge for making unjust judgement &
meating out injustice ?
Q84. when allegations of corruption , misuse of office , etc against judges are
made , why the accussed judges are not subjected to tests like poly graph , lie
detector , brain mapping , etc , in the interest of justice & truth ?
Q85. judges are not employees of government , so they are ineligible to be the
members of Karnataka state government judicial department house building cooperative society. Then how come , many judges including supreme court
judges are admitted as members of this society & allotted prime residential site
worth crores of rupees for a few thousands by the said society at said
societys judicial layout , yelahanka , Bangalore ? while the ordinary members
like peons , clerks in judicial department are waiting for a site since years , is not
the whole thing grossly illegal ?
Q86. in more than 70% of cases before all courts in India , central government or
state government or government agency is one of the parties. How many judges
or their family members , have received out of turn , favourable allotments of
sites , gas agency , petrol pumps , etc by the government ? is not such allotments
illegal ? what action ?
Q87. when a person under police custody or judicial custody suffer 3 rd degree
torture by police , is not the judge of the respective court which is handling that
tortured persons case responsible for it ?
Q88. has the higher judiciary legally prosecuted respective judges & the police
officers for committing 3rd degree torture , on charges of attempt to murder &

murder ? if not why ?

Q89. registrar , Mysore district & sessions court , has called for the candidatures
to various vacancies in that court from the public vide notification no :
ADMN/A/10825/2003 dated 19/11/2003. Please furnish me the merit ranking list of
selected candidates along with my merit ranking for the post of peon.
Q90. registrar , Bangalore city civil court , has called for the candidatures to
various vacancies in that court from the public vide notification no : ADMI(A)422/03 dated 19/05/2003. Please furnish me merit ranking list of selected
candidates for the post of peon.
Q91. when a person doesnt get adequate food , medical care while under police
custody or judicial custody , is not the respective judge dealing that persons
case responsible for it ? what action ?
Q92. how judiciary is monitoring food & medical care to prisoners ?
Q93. numerous accussed persons are suffering in jail under judicial custody , for
periods far exceeding the legally stipulated sentence periods. For example : a
pick-pocketer is in jail for one year , the judge finds him guilty of offence & gives
him 3 months sentence. What about the excess punishment of 9 months. Is not
the judge responsible for the illegal , excess punishment of the convict ? what
action against the judge in such cases ?
Q94. numerous innocents suffer in jail for years & finally the judge finds them as
innocents & acquits them of the charges. What about the prison sentence , the
innocent has already served ? is not the judge responsible for this illegal , unjust
punishment to an innocent ? remedy ? what action against the judge ?
Q95. does the privileges of judges cover both their official actions & the actions
arising out of misuse of office ?
Q96. does the privileges of judges cover both their official actions as judges &
their personal actions as individuals ?
Q97. are the fundamental rights of citizens supreme or the privileges of judges ,
constitutional functionaries supreme ?
Q98. what is the criteria adopted for promotion of judges ?
Q99. what is the criteria adopted for appointment of advocates from bar , as the
judges ?
Q100. what is the criteria adopted for appointment of retired judges , as
governors of states , members or as chairman of commissions , etc ?
Q101. how many judges belonging to oppressed classes scheduled caste ,
scheduled tribe , other backward classes , minorities & women are their in
supreme court , state high courts & subordinate courts ? kindly provide specific
figures .
Q102. what are the legal measures enforced by judiciary , to enforce the
accountability of judges & to check corruption in judiciary ?
Q103. are not these measures a failure , looking at present state of affairs of
judiciary ?
Q104. does the judges arrange for distribution of alchoholic drinks at the official
meetings , parties , at the tax payers expense ?
Q105. does any judges have included their consumption of alchoholic drinks , in

their hotel bill & claimed traveling allowance ?

Q106. what action has been taken against selectors ie Karnataka high court
judges & newly selected women judges involved in roost resort scandal in
Mysore , Karnataka ?
Q107. when common people / tax payers & even government employees are not
getting proper health care from government at government hospitals. Is it right &
just to provide premium health care to judges , constitutional functionaries at 5star private hospitals in India , abroad , all at tax payers expense ?
Q108. are the judges subjected to periodical health check-ups to ascertain their
health , mental faculties & mental balance in the midst of all work pressures ,
emotional tensions ?
Q109. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary for accepting applications seeking
public interest litigations ?
Q110. why numerous appeals for PIL by me , were not considered ?
Q111. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary , for appointing amicus curie in a
case ?
Q112. why my appeal to honourable supreme court , to make me as an amicus
curie in late P.M Rajiv Gandhis assassination case , was not considered by the
court ?
Q113. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary , for initiating suo-motto action ?
Q114. numerous cases of injustices are reported in the media daily , with
supporting evidences . why not the judiciary take suo-motto action in all such
cases ?
Q115. legal aid boards pre-judge the cases in the name of taking legal opinion ,
before providing legal aid to the needy ? is it not needy persons rights
violation ?
Q116. is not the safety of witnesses , parties in cases responsibility of the court ,
both during hearing of the case & afterwards ?
Q117. is the use of 3rd degree torture by police on prisoners , during the police
custody / judicial custody / prison sentence right ? what action ?
Q118. when the corrupt police officer & government prosecution advocate
together cover-up evidences , conducts improper investigation intentionally to
fail the case to cover-up rich crooks , high & mighty people , what action judge
takes in such cases ?
Q119. how does the judiciary monitor the wealth growth of police , government
advoctes , tax officials , officials of licensing authorities , to ensure proper & fair
prosecution of cases against rich & mighty ?
Q120. what are the status of appeals made by human rights activist
NAGARAJ.M.R. to the honourable supreme court of India ?
Q121. corruption is rampant for selection of officers to quasi-judicial positions
like district / taluk magistrates , tax officers , revenue officers , land acquisition
officers , etc. how the judiciary monitors over their quasi-judicial actions ?
Q122. subject to conditions , I , NAGARAJ.M.R. , editor , e-voice of human rights
watch , do offer my free services to honourable supreme court of India , to
apprehend corrupt judges , are you the honourable court ready to utilize it ?

Q123. what are the status of my appeals , sent to the honourable supreme court
of India , through government of indias on-line grievance system ( DPG &
DARPG ) :
DPG/M/2006/80008 , DARPG/E/2006/00057, DARPG/E/2006/00225 ,
DPG/M/2006/80021 , DARPG/E/2006/00253 , DPG/M/2006/80032 ,
DARPG/E/2006/01149 , DPG/M/2006/80047 , DARPG/E/2006/01164 ,
DPG/M/2006/80043 , DPG/M/2006/80085 , DARPG/E/2006/06704 ,
DARPG/E/2006/07017 , DARPG/E/2006/07018 , DPG/M/2006/80159 ,
DPG/M/2006/80162 , DARPG/E/2006/07864 , DPG/M/2006/80165 ,
DARPG/E/2006/07877 , DPG/M/2006/80167 , DARPG/E/2006/08028 ,
DARPG/E/2006/08029 , DARPG/E/2006/08032 , DARPG/E/2006/08043 ,
DARPG/E/2006/08044 , DPG/M/2006/80174 , DPG/M/2006/80193 ,
DARPG/E/2007/00044 , DPG/M/2007/80003 , DPG/M/2007/80010 ,
DARPG/E/2007/00164 , DARPG/E/2007/00165 , DPG/M/2007/80014 ,
DPG/M/2007/80025 , DPG/M/2007/80049 , DPG/M/2007/80055 , DPG/M/2007/80056 ,
DPG/M/2007/80078 , DPG/M/2007/80082 , DARPG/E/2007/02618
Q124. the appeals made to the honourable supreme court of India , copies of
which are available at following web pages
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/182 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/206 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/208 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/209 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw
what are the status of those appeals ?
Q125. in the media , we have seen reports about judges committing crimes rape
, attempt to murder , swindling government money , untouchability practice , the
disrespect to national flag , sale of judicial orders , bail , receipt of monetary
gains by way of royalty for books , prime real estate purchase at discounted rate ,
taking round about long foreign tours along with family in the name of official
work , etc. by this way , judges themselves are making contempt of court ,
constitution of India & citizens of India. How you are protecting the honour of the
judiciary , constitution of India & citizens of India ? please answer.
Q126. Is the government giving any facilities / affirmative actions to policemens
family as being given to defense personnel , ex-servicemen & their families , like
preferential site allotment , lpg agency , ration depot , reservation in college
admission , soft bank loans , etc ?
Q126. if not , why ? after all , the contribution of police to national security is on
par with defense forces.
Q127. is not some high police officials addressing their subordinates in singular
term , abusing them with vulgar words wrong ?
Q128. is not some police personnel calling public with singular term, abusing
public with vulgar words wrong ?
Q129. is it not the duty of prison authorities to protect the health, lives of prison
in-mates ?

Q130.what action is taken against police personnel who wrongly charged an

innocent person of criminal acts , resulting in his confinement in jail , finally
acquitted by court as found to be innocent ?
Q131. is it not right to with hold salary , gratuity , pension to such guilty police
personnel & pay it as compensation to victims of police failures & atrocities ?
Q132. does our Indian constitution legally permit a citizen of foreign origin
naturalized by marriage to an Indian or naturalized by option , to occupy any
constitutional office ?
Q133. during british rule in india & various other british colonies , criminal cases
were foisted against our freedom fighters in India & other british colonies. After
indias independence what happened to those cases ? did our Indian government
close all such cases or did it continue with the prosecution ?
Q134. in how many cases GOI & other state government continued with the
prosecution AGAINST OUR FREEDOM FIGHTERS ? why ?
Q135. what about the status of cases against shri.netaji subash Chandra bose ?
Q136. has GOI deported any freedom fighters to Britain or its colonies , to face
prosecution after India gained independence ? HAS GOI RECEIVED ANY
REQUEST FROM BRITAIN TO THAT EFFECT ? if yes , why , whom ?
Q.137. the honourable supreme court of India failed provide information to me as
per my RTI request appeal no : 91 / 2007 in response to your letter no : F1 / RTI /
A.91 / 2007 dt 13.12.07 , why ?
Q138 . the honourable union home secretary failed to give me information as per
my rti request , he transferred my application to others , in turn they transferred
the application to some others. Finally , complete truthful information was not
given , why ? as the union home secretary has got copies of all those replies in
response to transferred RTI application , will he send me a consolidated reply to
my present RTI request ?
Q139. in a high profile case before the honourable delhi high court , we have seen
how defense advocate mr. R.S.ANAND & prosecution advocate mr. I.U.KHAN
made a secret pact to win the case in favour of rich criminal , totally manipulating
prosecution witnesses , evidences & prosecution stand , totally making mockery
of justice system . how you are ensuring the delivery of justice , there being
numerous such advocates in practice ?
Q140. Smt. Sonia Gandhi is person of foreign origin , she wields enormous clout
more than the Prime Minister himself over the government of India being the chair
person of UPA. Is she legally permitted to summon confidential official records ,
minutes of the cabinet , to hold the cabinet meeting of union ministers ?
Q141. As per law , is she permitted to hold constitutional offices like prime
minister of India or president of India , etc ?
Q.142. What are the fundamental rights of a citizen guaranteed under the
constitution (Article 21) ?
Q143. What are the privileges conferred on legislators & parliamentarians by the
constitution of India?

a) Inside the House b) Outside the House

Q144. What are privileges conferred on constitutional functionaries, like
a) President of India b) Prime Minister of India
c) Chief Justice of India d) Chairman of NHRC
e) Central Vigilance Commissioners.
Q145. Are the privileges legal immunity conferred on above mentioned
constitutional functionaries ?
a) Cover all their official actions irrespective of merit.
b) Cover both their official & personal actions.
Q146. Are the privileges defined & codified ?
Q147. Are these privileges above freedom of the press ?
Q148. Are the liberty & fundamental rights of the citizens guaranteed by the
constitution, above the privileges of the constitutional functionaries or equal or
below ?
Q149. Can the Indian legislatures & parliament be equated to the House of
commons in England which is considered to be a superior court and court of
records ?
Q150. Can the division of powers, namely the legislature, the executive and the
Judiciary, be equated to the functioning of the House of commons and House of
Lords in England ?
Q151. Can a citizen be said to have committed breach of privilege of the House or
court and causing contempt of the house or court by raising the issues of
accountability of constitutional functionaries ?
Q152. Can a Legislature or Parliament enact a new law, to circumvent or to nullify
the Judicial orders with respect to wrongdoings by peoples representatives &
executive ? does not it amount to infringement of Judicial powers & contempt of
the court by the House.
Q153. Are the FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES of a citizen more important than
constitutional duties of a constitutional functionary or equal in importance to it ?

Q154. Can a constitutional functionary commit crimes, anti-national activities in

the name of constitutional duties, behind the legal veil of officials secret act & go
unaccountable for his actions and go unpunished by his legal immunity
privileges
Q155. Are the Legislators members of parliament, High court & Supreme court
Judges and other constitutional functionaries not willing to codify their privileges
for the reason that if codified their privileges would be curtailed and their action
would be subjected to legal scrutiny. ?
Q156. By votes of citizens Legislators and parliamentarians get seats in the
legislature and Parliament out of tax payers money, they get their pay, perks &
lead 5-Star luxurious lifestyles. Hence whether a vote of a citizen is above (More
valid) or a seat of legislator or parliamentarian is above or more valid in a
democracy ?
Q157. Judges & Constitutional functionaries are indirectly appointed by voters /
tax payers. Out of tax payers money, they get their pay, perks & lead 5-star
luxurious lifestyles. Hence, whether the vote of a citizen, fundamental duties of a
tax payer is above (more valid) or a seat of judge / constitutional functionary is
above (more
valid) in a democracy ?
Q158. If there is a vacuum in the Legislature or parliament, who is to fill up that
vacuum till such time that the legislature or parliament acts provide a solution by
performing its role by enacting proper legislation to cover the field (vacuum) ?
Q159. While it is an unhealthy practice for a Judge to claim to be a Judge in his
own cause, is it not worse for the members of the legislature and parliament to be
judges in their own cause ?
Q160. Are the Technicalities of the case more important to a judge or Justice to a
citizen, protection of fundamental rights of citizen.?
Q161. Why not the constitutional functionaries initiate suo moto action with
respect to numerous cases of injustices reported in Media ?
Q162. Why not the Judges admit various cases of Injustices affecting public, as
the Public Interest Litigation ? In some cases, the Public or the person
representing them is unable to afford the high cost of the case. Why not free legal
aid is given ?.
Q163. What is the criteria for admitting a P.I.L. & giving free legal aid ?
Q164. Communication free flow of information is the lifeline of a democracy.

Why the constitutional functionaries are not honouring the Right to Information of
Citizens ?
Q165. Recently , while assuming office as honourable chief justice of Karnataka ,
justice. P.D.DINAKAR , gave a blanket withdrawal of all internal departmental
enquiries against approximately 200 judges , is it just & legal ? give me the
names of accused judges & description of charges against them ?
Q166. does it not show that judges are more equal than others ?
Q167. who are involved in PF scam ? what action against guilty judges ?
Q168. Why you did not give information to me as per RTI Act inspite of appeal ?
refer. F1/RTI/A91/2007.
Q169. Almost a year ago , in the Karnataka state new chief justice of Karnataka
high court honble Mr.Dinakar (now elevated to supreme court of India) just on
assuming offices within hours scrapped disciplinary inquiry proceedings against
200+ erring judges. In such a short time no human being can study all the cases
in detail , then how come he arrived at this vital decision in such short time? Who
are those 200+ judges facing enquiry ?
Q170 .Recently in the Karnataka state , high court found out that a district judge
without conducting hearings properly , entering fictious dates of hearings (which
happens to be government holidays ) facilitated in exonerating a top politician .
has the court enquired into the previous judgements of the accussed judge ? did
it find any wrongdoings?
Q171. As per law , while on duty a person should not be drunk , under the
influence of alchohol , as it limits the functioning of his senses & brain. That is
why the acts & sayings of drunkards , committed / said when they are drunk are
not taken seriously. However most of the police officers after evening hours are
drunk , in that state only they apprehend many suspects & produce those
suspects at the residences of magistrates before magistrate during wee hours /
night. Some of of the judges are also drunk during that time. Does the senses of
drunken police & judges work properly to do their respective duties in identifying
criminals , apprehending them & to issue judicial orders. Are these actions of
police & judges in drunken state legal ?
Q 172 . What action has been taken in bhopal gas leak case against the guilty
police officials who changed the charge sheet against union carbide officials ?
Q 173 . What action has been taken against guilty police officials , district
magistrate , state ministers & central ministers who fully aided the criminals
Union Carbide official Mr. Anderson to escape law , to jump bail & flee the
country without courts permission ?
Q 174 . What action has been taken against the above said guilty with respect to
their contempt of court & for aiding a criminal to escape ?
Q 175. What action has been taken against the chief justice of India , who
changed the legal clause under which the guilty should be tried ? what action

has been taken against the CJI who became an official of the trust belonging to
the criminal ?
Q 176 . What action has been taken against the Indian Public servant who decided
to withdraw cases from US Courts with respect to Bhopal gas tragedy ?
Q 177 . What action has been taken against the state labour department &
pollution control board officials who have failed in their duties , inspite of earlier
warnings by journalists ?
Q 178 . What action has been taken against state cabinet ministers who decided
the quantum of compensation money to favour the criminal although they dont
have right to do so ?
Q 179 . What action has been taken against Presiding Judge of the trial court ,
Chief Justice of India , state police officials , public prosecutors & Central Bureau
of Investigation officials who kept quite all along and didnt press for the
extradition of the criminal Mr.Anderson , for producing the criminal accussed
no.1 before the trial court ?
Q 180 . Is it not SHAMEFUL for the judiciary , police , government officials &
peoples representatives who became part of Operation Crime Hush Up & aided
criminals responsible for ghastly murders of thousands & maiming of lakhs of
hapless public in Bhopal Gas Leak Tragedy?
Q 181 . Are these Corrupt Police , corrupt judges , corrupt ministers , corrupt
labour / pollution control board officials HUMAN BEINGS ?
Q 182 Why police are not registering my complaint against CJI & other
VVIPS ,Even after years ?
Q 183 dont the police of vijayanagar police station mysore have legal
jurisdiction to register the case against these VVIPs ? or just because the
criminals happens to be VVIPs ,they are not booked by police? If the said
police dont have legal jurisdiction to book these VVIPs , they should have
transferred the complaint to those authorities who have jurisdiction & authority
to book & prosecute these VVIPs , but not done so , why ?
Q 184 are not all these actions , of VVIPs & police amounting to cover up of
crimes & criminals ? are not these cover ups itself is a crime ?
Q 185. Even an appeal for justice by post card must be treated as PIL by courts
of justice . however my appeals for justice concerning public welfare , national
security sent through post , e-mail to supreme court of india are not admitted
as Public interest litigation , why ? does not these acts of Supreme court
amount to aiding criminals , anti nationals?
Q 186 Are not the honourable chief justice of india together with the
jurisdictional police & Revenue district magistrate responsible to protect the
fundamental & human rights of people ? why the CJI , Mysore DC &

Jurisdictional Police have failed to protect the fundamental & human rights of
people including mine ? For all the previous injustices I have suffered at the
hands of the criminal nexus Honourable CJI , Mysore revenue district magistrate
& jurisdictional police are together responsible , if anything untoward happens
to me or to my family members or to my dependents the quartet Honourable
Chief Justice of India , Honourable District Magistrate , Mysore , Honourable
Police Commissioner of Mysore city & Circle Inspector of police , vijayanagar
police station , mysore will be responsible .
These corrupt parasites will feel , understand the pain only when they also
suffer in the same manner. Let us pray to almighty In whose Court of justice
MATCH FIXING is not there & every body is equal , let us pray to that god to give
these corrupt parasites ghastly deaths nothing less nothing more.

YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : MAJORITY OF DOCUMENTS PERTAINS

TO YEAR 1994-2014 . SOME OF THE DOCUMENTS ARE DATED BACK TO 1947.

PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER FROM WHOM INFORMATION IS REQUIRED :

CPIO , SUPREME COURT OF INDIA , NEW DELHI.

FEES PAID : IPO 22F 282814 for rupees ten only

DATE : 29.03.2014 ..NAGARAJA.M.R.

PLACE : MYSORE , INDIA.. .( APPLICANT)

PAY UP Justice Sathasivam - DAMAGES PAYMENT / FINAL SHOW-CAUSE

NOTICE TO CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA

I dont know whether secretariat staff of CJI office & DARPG / DPG officials
are forwarding my appeals for justice , e-mails to you or not. They will be held
accountable for their lapses if any. This notice is against the repeated failure of
constitutional duties & indirect collusion with criminals by previous CHIEF
JUSTICEs OF INDIA. Notice is served against them , to the office of CJI , NOT
personally against you. At the individual level I do whole heartedly respect
honourable justice Sathasivam.
Please refer my appeal for justice through DARPG ;
DLGLA/E/2013/00292
DEPOJ/E/2013/00679

In india democracy is a farce , freedom a mirage. the most basic freedom RIGHT
TO INFORMATION & EXPRESSION , is not honoured by the government,as the
information opens up the crimes of V.V.I.Ps & leads to their ill-gotten wealth. The
public servants are least bothered about the lives of people or justice to them.
these type of fat cats , parasites are a drain on the public exchequer . these
people want ,wish me to see dead , wish to see HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH closed .
so that, a voice against injustices is silenced forever , the crimes
of V.V.I.Ps closed , buried forever.
To my numerous appeals , HRWs appeals to you ,you have not yet replied. It
clearly shows that you are least bothered about the lives of people or justice to
them .it proves that you are hell bent to protect the criminals at any cost. you are
just pressurising the police to enquire me ,to take my statement, to repeatedly
call me to police station all with a view to silence me.all of you enjoy
legal immunity privileges ,why dont you have given powers to the
police / investigating officer to summon all of you for enquiry ?or else why dont
all of you are not appearing before the police voluntarily for enquiry ?at the least
why dont all of you are not sending your statement about the case to the police
either through legal counsel or through post? you are aiding criminals ,by
denying me job oppurtunities in R.B.I CURRENCY NOTE PRESS mysore , city
civil court ,bangalore , distict court , mysore ,etc & by illegally closing my
newspaper.
there is a gross, total mismatch between your actions and your oath of office.

this amounts to public cheating & moral turpitude on your part.

1.you are making contempt of the very august office you hold.
2.you are making contempt of the constitution of india.
3.you are making contempt of citizens of india.
4.you are sponsoring & aiding terorrism & organized crime.
5.you are violating the fundamental & human rights of the citizens of india and of
neighbouring countries.
6.you are violating & making contempt of the U.N HUMAN RIGHTS CHARTER to
which india is a signatory.
7.you are obstructing me from performing my fundamental duties as a citizen
of india.
8. As a result of your gross negligence of constitutional duties you have caused
me damages / losses to the tune of RUPEES TWO CRORE ONLY.
you are hereby called upon to Pay damages to me and SHOW-CAUSE within 30
days , why you cannt be legally prosecuted for the above mentioned crimes .

If i am repeatedly called to police station or else where for the sake of

investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like loss of wages ,
transportation , job , etc must be borne by the government. prevoiusly the police /
IB personnel repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer of injustices) to
police station for questioning , but never called the guilty culprits even once to
police station for questioning , as the culprits are high & mighty . this type of one
sided questioning must not be done by police or investigating agencies . if
anything untoward happens to me or to my family members like loss of job ,
meeting with hit & run accidents , loss of lives , etc , the jurisdictional police
together with above mentioned accussed public servants , Chief Justice of India
& Jurisdictional District Magistrate will be responsible for it. Even if criminal
nexus levels fake charges , police file fake cases against me or my
dependents to silence me , this complaint is & will be effective.
if anything untoward happens to me or my dependents , the government
of india is liable to pay Rs. TWO crore as compensation to survivors of my
family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then that
compensation money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund. afterwards ,
the money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears from the salary , pension ,
property , etc of guilty judges , police officials , public servants & Constitutional
fuctionaries. Thanking you. Jai Hind , Vande Mataram.

Date : 19.03.2014..yours sincerely,

Place : Mysore , India.Nagaraja M R

RTI QUESTIONS HONOURABLE GOVERNOR OF RESEVE BANK OF INDIA IS

AFRAID TO ANSWER

SOILED NOTE FRAUD CASE @ RBI BANGALORE

-

Trauma of an old man

Complete case details also available

at http://members.lycos.co.uk/ganapathihariram/

As per allegations of RBI management Bangalore in 1977-79 , criminal

nexus of RBI employees stole Rs. 220000 from RBI Bangalore. All the
banks , government treasuries in Karnataka , submit defaced / soiled
currency notes to RBI Bangalore in exchange for good notes. RBI after
collecting such defaced currency notes , sorts out fairly good notes
which can be reissued & burns off the remaining totally defaced
currency notes. All these process is done in a systematic manner.

As per allegations of the management , the crime took place in the

period of 1977-79 at RBI Bangalore. A nexus of employees, took away

the currency bundles meant for destruction & substituted it in the
place of bundles of reissuables.

Charge sheet issued by RBI Bangalore office to mr.G.Hariram

Staff no.3698/156/84-85 dt 1 april 1985
Amended charge sheet staff no 3798/156-84/85 dt 8 april 1985

CBI has charge sheeted 17 employees in connection with this case ,

case olde no. cc34/1989
new no. sc 436/1991
. the honourable
21 city additional city civil & sessions court Bangalore in it's order dated
24.01.1992
discharged

03 charge sheeted employees , as the prosecution

failed to prove the charges against them. They came out clean , as
they were innocents saddled with the crime done by others. One of the
charge sheeted employee who turned approver for the prosecution, has
given detailed account of the crime. Nowhere he has mentioned the
involvement of accussed no.15 mr.G.Hariram in the crime.

Even after coming out clean, mr.G.Hariram was not reinstated into
service by RBI. They gave the ruse of domestic enquiry & showed
contempt to the court order. On appeal, the honourable high court of

Karnataka ordered RBI to review it's order with respect to

mr.G.Hariram , still RBI failed to reinstate mr.G.Hariram into service
, once gain showing contempt to the court of law.

In India as per law , the decisions of court of law are binding on all
, orders of court over rides the organisation's internal rules ,
service rules , etc. inspite of lack of evidences, in a whimsical
manner the higher authorities of RBI , fixed some innocents as the
scape goats heaped all charges against them ( against whom they had
personal grudge , dislikes ). RBI repeatedly showed contempt to the
court orders , dismissed the scape goat - ailing old man mr.G.Hariram
from service. RBI snatched away his PF money towards the alleged loss
to the bank , didn't pay his gratuity amount , salary arrears and
finally he was even deprived of the pension. As a result , the old man
has even lost his social prestige, dignity , his family suffered a lot
& he is a mental wreck today.

Why RBI authoroties are hell bent upon to send away the innocents /
scape goats away from service ? why CBI didn't conduct polygraph tests
of all the accussed , specifically higher officers of RBI , managers
of RBI office Bangalore ? probably the scape goats were aware of the

crimes master minded by higher ups & didn't co-operate with the higher
ups in their crimes. So, the criminals were afraid that the scape
goats will blurt out truth to the world , fixed non co-operating
innocents themselves as criminals.

Who will give justice to innocents like old man mr.G.Hariram & who
will bell the corrupt , criminals , fat cats of RBI ?

APPEAL UNDER SEC 19 (3) OF RTI ACT 2005 OF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA &
GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

APPLICATION FOR INFORMATION AS PER RTI ACT 2005

( SEE RULE 22 OF RTI ACT 2005 )

FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJ.M.R.

ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJ.M.R.,

EDITOR , E-VOICE OF HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH,

# LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,

HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,
HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA
PIN 570017.

DETAILS OF DOCUMENTS / WRITTEN STATEMENTS / INFORMATION

REQUIRED :

HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS /

ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS - WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers )
ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME.
WITH RESPECT TO CASE NO old CC34 / 1989 & NEW NO SC436/1991 AT 21
ST ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS COURT BANGALORE

CHARGE SHEETED OFFICER MR.G.HARIRAM RBI BANGALORE

CHARGE SHEET NO staff no.3698/156/84-85 dt 01.01.1985

Amended charge sheet staff no.3798/156-84/85 dt 08.04.1985

1. Why didn't you notice the alleged crimes of 1977 , 78 & 79 till the
mid of 1979 ?

2. This crime came to light only due to anonymous phone calls of good
Samaritans to authorities , but not due to your inspection . is your
inspection division working properly ?

3. why there is no security check up of officers during entry & exit

out of premises ?

4. why there is no individual weighment , individual statement of

value of bags of reissuable notes & bags of note meant for destruction
, after sorting is done, why they are not tallied with total weight ,
value of notes issued for sorting ?

5. Immediately after noticing the crime, why did not you transfer all
the employees of those sections ?

6. why did not you take steps to preserve3 & protect respective

documents relating to such high profile crime ?

7. why didn't you immediately issue charge sheet to all the accussed &
waited till 1983 ?

8. Why RBI has left out , so many officers ( who worked in the same
sections for more period than accused officers ) from domestic enquiry ?

9. why CBI also failed to put those people in the charge sheet before
the court ?

10. is it because they were in favorable terms with the vested interests ?

11. did the CBI dance to the tune of vested interests in RBI while
preparing charge sheet & during investigation , instead of
independent investigation ?

12. those left out probables from the charge sheet might have caused
the destruction of evidences / records. During the course of domestic
enquiry / court proceedings , it has been recorded that some records
have been destroyed. Are not CBI & RBI responsible for destruction of

evidences , aiding true criminals get away ?

13. in normal times , what is the period specified in RBI regulations

for preserving old documents / records ?

14. after noticing such a high profile crime the RBI must have taken
utmost care to preserve such old records for indefinite time , for
producing before courts of law as & when demanded. But it didn't , why ?

15. does not this point to connivance of higher authorities of RBI ,

with the criminals ?

16. RBI authorities have conducted domestic mass enquiries , instead

of individual enquiries , is it not detrimental to the rights of defense ?

17. RBI authorities have stated that court proceedings & domestic
enquiry are independent of each other & are not binding on one
another. However RBI authorities straight away took on record of
domestic enquiry the court statements , evidences , but didn't honour
the order of same court of law ? why this double standard by RBI ?

18. The alleged crime was committed in 1977-79, but charge sheet was
framed in mid 1985 , why this long delay ?

19. didn't this facilitate the masterminds of crime to destroy ,

manipulate evidences ?

20. as stated before court , indeed some records , 22nd currency note
packet were missing , who is responsible for it ?

21. has the CBI conducted enquiry , polygraph test of RBI higher
officers - S.N.RAZDAN , W.S.SARAF , J.P.AWASTHI , J.MITRA & others ,
if not why ?

22. is it not due to inefficiency , negligence of duty by such high

ranking managers , that such a crime occurred in RBI Bangalore ?

23. what disciplinary action RBI has taken against the inefficient ,
negligent higher officials ?

24. whatever internal rules an organization makes must be within the

line of law. If such internal laws of the organization are violative

of law , fundamental rights of employees , such internal rules become

illegal. Are not the way of RBI disciplinary proceedings illegal ?

25. as per RBI pension regulations 1990 , RBI has the right to deduct
any loss caused to the bank , from the pension of RBI employee if the
misconduct of employee is proved in judicial proceedings . even though
mr.G.Hariram came out clean from the court , why RBI has denied his
pension ?

26. judicial courts of law are appellate authorities over & above ,
domestic enquiry committees & judicial orders supersedes the domestic
enquiry proceedings. Still RBI showed contempt of court & didn't
reinstate mr..G.Hariram into service , why ?

27. even if an employee's misconduct causing loss to the bank is

proved , before denying him pension (towards making up loss to the
bank) , previous sanction of the central board of RBI must be taken.
But in mr.G.Hariram's case , pension was denied in full without taking
previous sanction of the central board of RBI , is it not illegal ?

28. RBI alleged that mr..G.Hariram caused loss to the tune of Rs.14000

to the bank & recovered it from his provident fund dues. There was
nothing left over to recover , still RBI completely denied pension to
mr.G.Hariram , why ?

29. ideally, domestic enquiry findings / disciplinary actions should

be completed first , then the employee can appeal to appropriate court
of law. In mr.G.Hariram's case , CBI & RBI failed to prove the charges
in court of law , as a result court discharged him from the charges.
To cover-up it's failures RBI management dragged domestic enquiry much
beyond court orders date & gave findings indicting mr..G.Hariram. does
the enquiry officer of domestic enquiry think that he is over & above
the court of law ? is it not illegal & contempt of court ?

30. ideally , RBI authorities should have appealed to higher court

against lower court order discharging mr.G.Hariram from charges. But
it was not done , why ?

31. did the RBI pay interim relief to mr.G.Hariram , during suspension
period ?

32. the undue delay in filing charge sheet , consequent destruction of

key evidences , dishonour / contempt of court orders , undue haste in

giving findings , dismissal , denial of of pension without central
board's sanction , all point towards criminals within RBI higher
management. What disciplinary action has been taken against
J.P.AWASTHI, S.N.RAZDAN,J.MITRA, W.SARAF & others ? if not why ?

33. why charge sheet was amended? Is it legal ?

34. did the charge sheet was amended to falsely implicate

mr..G.Hariram , by including cancelled note vault in the charge sheet ?

35. does not this itself show that it is not statement of actual
happenings / facts , but a cunning ploy to mislead investigation
towards fixed innocents from actual criminals ?

36. is it true that that only 5% of sample inspection is done out of bundled
verified defective note packets ?

37. is not the conduct of joint / mass enquiries of all charge sheeted officers
illegal ?

38. how come such an important evidence 22 nd note packet went missing ?

39. is it because it may point towards real criminals ?

40. as per the statement of management witness / inspection head / expert

mr.vijendra rao , the notes of earlier dates have been removed from
packets made into new bundles , right ?

41. as per his statement , entire certificates , seals of some asst treasurers
are there , who didn't work at all on that day is not it ?

42. does not it show that some body else was misusing the seals , putting
some innocents seals over the notes ?

43. does it not show that , crime has taken place at verification section ?

44. does it not show involvement of some asst treasurers ?

45. why asst treasurers have not been charge sheeted ?

46. why inspection of RBI Bangalore office was not done between 1975 &
1979 ?

47. is it not true that you failed to produce all records showing internal
inspection / audits , during domestic enquiry & court proceedings ?

48. your expert mr.vijendra rao has stated that some seal marks are
smudged , he has stated some seal marks appears to be so & so. He has
clearly nowhere stated that this seal mark is exactly this , so he himself is
not 100% sure ?

49. your expert nowhere said that 100% sure this seal mark is this , on that
day this seal was issued to mr.G.Hariram , isn't it ?

50. your expert says during 1975 , he didn't notice3 any fraud. However
approver says fraud was there before mid 1977 also. Why no action has been
taken ?

51. why you didn't produce all records of all persons , who have specifically
worked in alleged sections , the registers of those departments with daily
activity report containing seal nos , packet nos , bag nos , etc ?

52. are not their chances of some criminals putting the seal marks of
innocent officers over the notes , bundles , bags , etc ?

53. your expert is not 100% sure of seal mark , your records are not there to
prove the presence of charge sheeted officers in the alleged sections ,
neither your expert nor your records are 100% sure on what date , at what
stage , by whom crime was committed , isn't it ?

54. is not the charge sheet amounting to higher ups picking up officers they
dislike & falsely implicating them ?

55. is it not cunning ploy of higher ups to divert attention from original
criminals ?

56. why no action was taken against currency officer of 1977-79 mr.J.Mitra ?
why his pension , super annuation benefits were not withheld ?

57. what is your justification , supporting evidence , records for picking up

only three officers including mr.G.Hariram for legal prosecution and leaving
the majority of probables ?

58. why you have dropped charges against five asst treasurers ? why you
didn't even conduct domestic enquiry against them , let alone legal
prosecution ?

59. Is it RBI's & CBI's way of fair play & justice ?

60. as inly 5% sampling of verified note bundles are done , there are more
possibilities of rebundled packets getting unnoticed in relaxed 95% lot , isn't
it ?

61. you have left out so many officers who worked in those sections, some
of whom even became management witnesses , instead of being charge
sheeted by the management, is it fair play & legal ?

62. who are the bank employees , from whom you have recovered the
alleged bank loss of Rs.220000 ?

63. were all of them charge sheeted , enquired , legally prosecuted ,

dismissed & their pension , gratuity withheld ?

64. you don't have any internal statuotary records to prove that
mr.G.Hariram worked in those departments , except a currency officer's
office note dated just on the eve of charge sheet years after the alleged
crime ? does it not prove that this note has been concocted just to fix
mr.G.Hariram ?

65. where as you have records of other officials attendance in those

departments , but not charge sheeted them why ?

66. three officers of staff grade A daily work in three sections out of 40
officers , why you have picked up only mr.G.Hariram , out of 1095 working
days , he has worked for only 223 days in those sections , still those officers
who worked for more days in those sections are not charge sheeted why ?
the approver , the management expert witness , shift registers , V2 registers
, Destruction certificates , Form CD 55 , etc , nobody , no records were able
to say on what date , at what stage , by whom crime took place , also they
were unable to say on what date at what stage crime was committed by
mr.G.Hariram ? is it not futile imagination , cunning ploy of RBI higher
authorities to fix innocent Mr.G.Hariram ?

67. the management expert witnesses said , the most probable place of
crime is punching / Cancelled Note Vault , incinerator , where asst
treasurers were joint custodians . they were not enquired & let off why ?

68.
the charge sheet alleges extraction / substitution of defaced note
packets. Where as the management expert witness say substitution of
defaced notes only ? is not there difference between loss of one number of
note & 100 number of notes ?

69. as per the normal course of duty , staff officers does not count notes in
each bundles , but they just count the number of bundles only. Is not there
chances of inserted note bundles or bundles containing less number of notes
going unnoticed ? is it not the failure of statuotary system of work
practices ?
70. does not all these prove higher authorities of RBI & CBI were hell bent to
fix mr.G.Hariram & to shield the original criminals ?
Questions with respect to other cases :
71. how do you monitor the work of bank officials nominated as directors of
companies which have availed bank loans ?
72. how do you monitor the work of companies , in which banks have
invested ?
73. how do you monitor the rapid wealth growth of certain bank officials ,
who work in shares investment / equity funds section , etc ?
74. inspite of project reports by bank officials , over assessment of
collateral securites / value of debtor companies by bank officials , the loans
become NPAs & full value cann't be realized in the market by selling off the
assets of debtor companies also. In such cases , what action is taken against
erring bank officials who collude with criminal industrialists for availing
higher amount of loan than permissible ?
75. give bankwise specific figures of NPAs.
76. give names of industrial groups / promoters whose companies have

become NPAs , so that public can be aware of them , before investing in

new companies promoted by them.
77. is not collection of loan from debtors of bank through rowdies / recovery
agents , illegal ?
78. why not criminal complaints filed against bank mangers for aiding ,
abetting rowdism , murdering people ?
79. if your method of employing rowdies to collect loans of Rs.10000 from
commoners is right , what would you do to a promoter of a debtor company
to recover loans of crores of rupees , supari killing ? but debtors of crores of
rupees is let off coolly by banks , why ?
80. what is the exact amount of loss caused to the exchequer by karim lala
telgi who printed fake stamp papers ?
81. what action has been taken against those involved ?
82. have you taken action against all those mentioned by telgi during narco
analysis test , if not why ? is it because they are powerful & bigwigs ?
83. how you are controlling the illegal finance activities , money lending by
individuals , pawn brokers & chit fund companies ?
84. how you are monitoring the receipt of public donations , foreign
donations by many NGOs ?
85. how many erring NGOs , chit fund companies , pawn brokers , individuals
you have booked for illegal finance activities ?
Questions relating to RBI CURRENCY NOTE PRESS MYSORE
86. who were responsible for selling the good printing machine at security
press nasik to scamster karim lala telgi as scrap ?
87. who recruited the candidates below merit rankings in R.B.I for what
criminal roles ?

88. how many irregularities have taken place in R.B.I till date ?
89. who is responsible for installing, operating & supervising the security
set-up in R.B.I ?
90. how the raw materials ie number of paper sheets, ink, etc are
accounted for in inward stores & while issuing for printing ?
91. how wastages, scrap of ink , papers , etc in the printing process are
accounted for?
92. How the finished goods ie currency notes are accounted for ?
93. Who keeps physical figures & possession of goods, inventory of all the
above?
94. How the scrap paper is disposed off ?
95. From security angle who keeps track from start till dispatch ?
96. Give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for the post of stores
assistant in BRBNMPL in the year 1995-96 ?
97. give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for the post of process
assistant at BRBNMPL in the year 1996 ?
98. give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for the post of process
assistants & maintenance assistants at BRBNMPL in the year 1996-1998 ?
99. is not RBI & BRBNMPL authorities created by statuotary laws , fully
funded by public money ie from government exchequer ?
100. still why BRBNMPL & RBI refused to answer my previous information
request as per RTI Act ? are you afraid that skeletons will come out of

cubboard ?
101. what action initiated against the SBI branch Bangalore & SBI Overseas
branch for loss of cheque / draft amounting to crores of rupees ? if not
why ?
102. give me specific figures bank wise with respect to loss caused to the
bank by loss of cheques or demand drafts , etc ?
103. how RBI is containing crimes of loss of cheques / DDs causing huge
losses to the banks to the tune of crores of rupees ?
YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : MAJORITY OF DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO
YEAR 1988 onwards . SOME OF THE DOCUMENTS ARE DATED BACK TO 1947.
FEES PAID : IPO NO 63E 318935 FOR RUPEES TEN ONLY Favouring CPIO RBI
HQ MUMBAI
PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER FROM WHOM THE INFORMATION IS REQUIRED :
V.S.DAS , CENTRAL PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER , O/O HONOURABLE
GOVERNOR, RBI HQ , CENTRAL OFFICE , AMAR BUILDING , P.M.MARG
,MUMBAI-400001.

Date : 01.11.2008. Yours sincerely,

Place : Mysore.. Nagaraj.M.R.

edited , printed , published & owned by NAGARAJA.M.R. @ : LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO FIRST STAGE ,
OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE , LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR ,HEBBAL ,MYSORE -570017 INDIA
cell : 91 9341820313
home page:
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/Home ,
http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarion-of-dalit ,
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/ ,

http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/e-clarionofdalit/ ,

http://paper.li/f-1367938674

Contact : naghrw@yahoo.com , nagarajhrw@hotmail.com ,

http://www.amnesty.org/en/user/naghrw
A Member of Amnesty International