Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 13


Bill Clinton—Islamic Charity

Though he may not have realized the consequences, Bill Clinton has played into Islamist
hands like a dream. His participation in establishing global governance may seem noble and
grand as well as profitable while his appeasement to globalist Islamists has severely undermined
America’s safety, sovereignty and the Constitution. Because Clinton accepted millions of dollars
from Islamic sources, it is quite probable that he is considered an Islamic charity by Islamic
scholars who make such determinations to advance Islam.
Foreign leaders can surely see that Clinton is easily bribed and seduced. He set a poor
example as a leader and compromised the freedom of hundreds of millions of free people. One
example is America’s youth, who is now confused as to whether oral sex is really sex. Another
example his wittingly or unwittingly betrayal of the Christian Serbs in Bosnia where he helped
set up an Islamic government under the guise of humanitarianism and multiculturalism
Bill Clinton studied international affairs at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C.
as an undergraduate. He worked as an intern for the United States Senate Committee on Foreign
Relations, chaired by Senator J. William Fulbright, an Arkansas Democrat Senator. Clinton was
a great admirer of Fulbright, who was an outspoken critic of Israel and a leading critic of United
States involvement in the Vietnam War.1
Clinton’s mentor, William Fulbright, was an experienced observer of Middle Eastern
affairs and he developed close connections between Saudi Arabia and U.S. oil companies. After
he lost his bid for re-election in 1974, Fulbright became a registered agent for the Saudi
Government and engaged in activities on the Saudi behalf in efforts to shift American loyalty
from Israel to Saudi Arabia.2
During his two terms in office, Clinton made many moves that would promote Arab
interests. His collaboration with the since convicted terrorist, Abdurahman Alamoudi, a self-
described supporter of Hamas and Hezbollah, founder and an Executive Director for the

Bill Clinton: MSN Encarta, February 16, 2009, http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761564341/Bill_Clinton.html
Emerson, Steve; The American House of Saud: The Secret Petrodollar Connection, Chapter 6, pp. 100-101,
Franklin Watts Publisher, 1985
American Muslim Council (AMC), allowed for hundreds of millions of dollars to come in from
the Middle East for a variety of causes including Clinton’s library and Presidential Fund. As
Abdurahman Alamoudi donated $15-25 million to Clinton’s funds, he cultivated ties with the
Democratic Party, and contributed significant amounts to a variety of its partisans and candidates
for years.
Clinton privileged Abdurahman Alamoudi with the position of Islamic Affairs Advisor
and Pentagon appointee in charge of choosing and training Muslim chaplains for the U.S.
military. Certainly not in the best interest of America, Alamoudi was also a State Department
“Goodwill Ambassador” to Muslim nations and helped Clinton write the 1995 “Religious
Expression in Public Schools,” a guideline that paved the way for Islamic instruction in the
public school system, effectively stopping schools from displaying nativity scenes and saying the
pledge of allegiance. Clinton and Alamoudi’s alliance opened the doors for lessons on Islam
under the guise of history and social studies as funding for Islamic educational materials poured
in from Saudi Arabia and Muslim nations.
While in office, and after leaving his presidential post, Bill Clinton continues to make
millions of dollars in speaking fees from Arab sources. To be fair, Dubai has given millions of
dollars to both Clinton and G.W. Bush. However, Bill Clinton received $300,000 for a speech in
January 2002 in an effort to legitimize Dubai after 9/11. Hilary Clinton’s 2008 tax records
showed that for 2007, Bill Clinton made approximately $5 million from foreign countries
including Kuwait’s National Bank, with other sources in Canada, Germany, India, Malaysia,
Mexico and Portugal, and Hong Kong.3
Dubai has been suspended from the U.S. Overseas Private Investment Corporation
insurance programs because of non-compliance with internationally recognized worker rights
standards. Tens of thousands of migrant workers from India and Pakistan are reportedly abused
in Dubai yet Clinton’s former Secretary of State Madeline Albright, former security advisor
Sandy Berger, and Al Gore have attended big events there.4 Dubai also denies Israelis entrance
into the country and does not allow the importation of Israeli goods, or goods with Israeli parts.5
Lee, Matthew; “Bill Clinton Made Millions From Foreign Sources,” January 27, 2009,
Morris, Dick & McGann, Eileen; Fleeced, Chapter 7, pp 156-157, 2008, Harper Collins, New York, NY
Ibid; Chapter 7, pp 161, 2008
Under the guise of humanitarianism, Bill Clinton created a Dubai Scholars Program for
American students at the American University in Dubai.
While Hillary Clinton loudly opposed the Dubai Ports deal, Bill Clinton gave Dubai
advice and recommended the Glover Park Group to represent the country. The Glover Park
Group was a group of lobbyists that included top advisers to Bill and Hillary Rodham Clinton.
The advisors were paid about $100,000 each to help the government-owned Dubai International
Capital Corporation in its acquisition of the British engineering firm Doncasters Group Ltd.
Glover Park represented companies that Dubai has a stake in.6 At issue was the sale of port
management businesses in six major U.S. seaports to a company based in the United Arab
Emirates (UAE), and whether such a sale would compromise port security in the U.S.
Taking a stand that it did not pose a significant security threat, Clinton and New York
Democrat Senator Charles Schumer hoped to acquire the port operations for the Dubai Company
in the ensuing controversial “Dubai Ports Deal.” Glover Park’s contract with Dubai was
channeled through the Los Angeles law office of Raj Tanden, a representative of the United
Emirate’s royal family in their 2005 acquisition of $1 billion in U.S. real estate holdings. Tanden
is the brother of longtime Hillary Clinton policy adviser Neera Tanden who served as a
congressional liaison for Bill Clinton before becoming a key Hillary Clinton Senate campaign
President Clinton issued statements promising to find terrorists, but actually pardoned
sixteen terrorists convicted of executing one hundred thirty bombings. Clinton shut down
investigations of Islamic charities, radically downsized our military, and cut funding for CIA
informants. He refused delivery of Osama bin Laden from Sudan, and he repeatedly refused to
act on detailed information about both al-Qaeda and Bin Laden between ongoing terrorist
bombings that led up to the attack on the World Trade Center in 2001. Robert Baer, a 21-year
veteran of the CIA’s Directorate of Operations states:

“Whether it was Osama bin Laden, Yasser Arafat, Iranian terrorism,

Saddam Hussein, or any of the other evils that so threaten the world, the

Ibid; Chapter 7, p. 158, 2008, Harper Collins, New York, NY
Thrush, Glenn; “Clinton Aides Had Hand in Dubai Deal,” September 14, 2006,
Clinton administration seemed determined to sweep them all under the
carpet.” 8

In 1995, the 104th Congress included a provision that would authorize ANWR exploration
but Bill Clinton cast the cloak of environmentalism over ANWR when he vetoed the bill
furthermore promising to veto all legislation for ANWR exploration. Alaska’s North Slope once
averaged two million barrels of oil per day, representing more than half the oil used on the West
Coast. With ANWR off-limits, Alaska’s drilling production declined to less than half their
former rate, allowing OPEC and other foreign oil producers to make up the difference.
According to a letter signed by conservative leaders and sent to the House and Senate Leadership
on March 8, 2006, development of ANWR would:

“... increase proven U.S. crude oil reserves by fifty percent; equivalent to
approximately a quarter century of current imports from Saudi Arabia.”9

In Alaska, caribou numbers have actually increased under the warmth of pipeline, and
scientists contest the accuracy of the global warming theory. If Clinton had not vetoed the
legislation fourteen years ago, as much as 1.4 million barrels of oil per day could now be
produced in America.
Curtailing the production of domestic oil by placing oil reserves off-limits, is based on an
unproven theory. The security threat it imposes on the United States suggests misplaced loyalty
because the need for oil places Americans at the mercy of foreign oil producers from countries
that resent the Constitution and freedom. The U.S. domestic need for oil combined with
homeland security issues raise concerns that global warming might literally be part of an agenda
to weaken America’s sovereignty. Trillions of American dollars now go instead to Arab
countries allowing them to buy their way into American policy through financial institutions,
educational programs, while they finance terror organizations and build mosques around the
world. 10
Schroeder, Jen; “How Clinton Sold Our Children to Islam,” http://www.blessedcause.com/clinton.html
Weyrich, Paul M; “Drill ANWR: Realism Over Emotion,” May 23, 2006, http://www.aim.org/guest-column/drill-
“OPEC’s Senate Caucus,” June 5, 2006, http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2006/jun/05/20060605-101144-
On September 22, 1997 Bill Clinton made a speech to the Arab dominated U.N. General
Assembly describing treaties he had signed as a “web of institutions and arrangements.” He
referred to them as “international ground rules for the 21st century.”
As the descriptions suggest, Clinton’s Global Warming Treaty and the NATO Expansion
Treaty were designed to bind the United States in a global web of entanglement for the purpose
of "binding international commitments to protect the environment.” Clinton urged Americans to
support “the emerging international system.”
Clinton played right into Islamist globalization when he supported Muslims in Bosnia.
According to a U.S. Senate Republican Policy Committee Report, President Clinton funneled
weapons and money into Bosnia to prop up the Izetebegovic Muslim government in the
country’s capital Sarajevo through the Third World Relief Agency. The Third World Relief
Agency had been organized in 1987 by Muslim fundamentalists to cover efforts to import
Muslim fundamentalism into Yugoslavia.
The Third World Relief Agency promoted the creation of an Islamic state in Bosnia,
promoting a “religious sense among Bosnia’s secular Muslims.” The Muwafaq foundation,
founded by Saudi billionaire Khalid bin Mahfouz in 1991 also funded the Muslim Bosnian
fighters from 1991-1995. Christians comprised of Catholic Croatians and Eastern Orthodox
Serbs were still the majority in Bosnia in 1992 when Bosnia broke away from Yugoslavia.11
Bill Clinton lifted the Iranian Arms Embargo solely for shipments of arms and personnel
from Iran to the Bosnian Muslims. Throughout most of his administration, beginning in 1993,
Clinton knew about the arms smuggling scheme while pretending to be neutral. He also provided
additional weapons from America at taxpayer’s expense.
In April 1994, Clinton gave the Muslim-led government of Bosnia additional shipments
of weapons from Iran and other Muslim countries at the urging of National Security Council
chief Anthony Lake and the U.S. ambassador to Croatia, Peter Galbraith. The Clinton
Administration’s policy of aiding delivery of arms to the Bosnian Muslims made it instrumental
in a network of international governments and organizations that are pursuing the Islamization of
Europe and America under the guise of humanitarian and multicultural diversity.

Iranian Revolutionary Guards entered Bosnia in large numbers from radical Muslim
organizations from countries including Malaysia, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, and Turkey.
The Iranian intelligence service developed intelligence networks, set up terrorist support
systems, and recruited terrorist sleeper cells as agents of influence. The Clinton Administration’s
involvement with the Islamic network included inspections of missiles from Iran by U.S.
government officials.
The President of Bosnia, Alija Izetbegovic, wrote the radical “Islamic Declaration: A
Programme for the Islamization of Muslims and the Muslim Peoples,” which calls for “the
Islamic movement” to take power as soon as it could overturn “the existing non-Muslim
government . . .and build up a new Islamic one,” destroying all non-Islamic institutions.
Izetbegovic’s book advocated the creation of an international federation of Islamic states.
Alija Izetbegovic’s Islamic Declaration proclaimed that:

“There can be neither peace nor coexistence between the Islamic religion
and non-Islamic social institutions.”

A House Republican Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare Report,

dated September 1, 1992 confirmed that Alija Izetbegovic intended to establish an Islamic
Republic in Bosnia by reporting that:

“At the center of the Iranian system in Europe is Bosnia-Hercegovina's

President, Alija Izetbegovic, . . . who is committed to the establishment of
an Islamic Republic in Bosnia-Hercegovina.”

The Task Force report described Izetbegovic’s contacts with Iran and Libya before the Bosnian
war began. In 1991, Izetbegovic was noted as a “fundamentalist Muslim” and a member of the
“Fedayeen of Islam” organization, an Iranian-based radical group that dates back to the 1930’s.
In the late 1960’s, The Fedayeen of Islam recognized Ayatollah Khomeini as their supreme
leader, or Imam, while he was still in exile by the late Shah. Izetbegovic stepped-up his efforts to
establish Islamic power in Bosnia following Khomeini’s accession to power in 1979, and
Izetbegovic openly declared his alliance with Iran. The Iranian regime supported Izetbegovic
during his 1996 election campaign with $500,000 in cash.
The Clinton Administration’s policy completely misinterpreted the Bosnian Muslim
government of Alija Izetbegovic. Rather than the tolerant, multicultural democratic government
it pretended to be, Izetbegovic’s party, the Party of Democratic Action (SDA), was guided by the
principles of radical Islam.12
Bill Clinton’s ties to the Islamic Republic of Iran were revealed in a commentary written
by Dr. Rachael Ehrenfeld on January 5, 2009 for Forbes. Dr. Ehrenfeld is director of the
American Center for Democracy and author of “Funding Evil: How Terrorism is Financed and
How to Stop It.”
Ehrenfeld wrote that on Dec. 19, 2008 the Islamic regime contributed between $25,000
and $50,000 to the William J. Clinton Foundation and $30,000 in the fiscal year ending March
2006 through the Iranian owned Alavi Foundation operating in New York.
The President of the Alavi Foundation, Farshid Jahedi, was indicted the very same day in
2008 with obstructing justice by the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York for
allegedly destroying documents subpoenaed by a grand jury concerning the relationship of the
Alavi Foundation with the Iranian Bank Melli, and ownership of the Manhattan office building,
home of the Alavi Foundation at 650 Fifth Avenue.
The Treasury Department had just designated the Alavi Foundation's partner, New York-
based ASSA Corporation, a terrorist entity as a front company created and controlled by Iran's
Bank Melli to funnel money from the United States to Iran. 13
The Alavi Foundation office building at 650 Fifth Avenue had been constructed and
operated in the 1970’s by the late Shah of Iran as a non-profit organization to pursue Iran’s
charitable interests in the United States. The building was financed Bank Melli, a state-owned
bank in Iran. The Alavi Foundation was first known as The Pahlavi Foundation, and renamed the
Mostazafan Foundation when Ayatolah Khomeini rose to power. Later renamed the Alavi
Foundation and forming the “650 Fifth Avenue Company” in 1989 in partnership with Bank
Melli but disguising the bank’s ownership.

Craig, Larry; United States Senate Republican Policy Committee Report, “Extended Bosnia Mission Endangers
U.S. Troops: Clinton-Approved Iranian Arms Transfers Help Turn Bosnia into Militant Islamic Base,” January 16,
1997, http://rpc.senate.gov/releases/1997/iran.htm

HP-1330, Treasury Designates Bank Melli Front Company in New York City , December 17, 2008,
In 1995 the Department of Treasury had prohibited exportation of any goods, technology,
or services from the United States to Iran, or the Government of Iran without a valid export license
from the U.S. Department of Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). According to the
Treasury Department, ASSA Corporation provided services to Bank Melli by maintaining the
bank’s interest in the 650 Fifth Avenue office building and transferring income from the office to
Bank Melli without an OFAC license and alleging money laundering.
Bank Meli has been recognized as a front for transferring money for Iran’s nuclear
weapons program, and was designated a terrorist entity on Oct. 25, 2007.
According to Ehrenfeld’s commentary in Forbes, the Alavi Foundation reported
$87,899,567 in assets and $3,315, 237 in charity to the IRS in 2007. The foundation had given
$365,056 to schools and universities, $328,667 for book publications and distribution, and
$262,325 in interest-free loans to schools. It claims to support Shiite educational, religious and
cultural programs, while owning and funding several mosques and educational centers in the
states of New York, Maryland, Texas and California.
Though the contributions to Clinton were not found to be illegal, accepting money from
Islamists and pretending they are not part of an Islamic agenda allows them to advance in the
Phyllis Schlafley, political activist, constitutional attorney, and columnist wrote a series
of articles about Clinton’s global involvement. Schlafley wrote that Madeleine Albright testified
before the Senate of Foreign Relations Committee, admitting that NATO Expansion commits
U.S. to defend the borders and the NATO-defined “interests” of Eastern Europe, extending its
influence to reach “the Middle East to Central Africa.” The NATO Treaty means that NATO, not
Congress, decides when America will go to war. Using U.S. tax dollars to fund the Armed
Services as global police officers and global social workers, and burdening the U.S. with one
“Bosnia” after another.
The NATO Expansion Treaty abandoned Ronald Reagan’s successful strategy of peace
through strength, replacing it with a strategy of entering foreign conflicts under NATO or UN
command. It was also against the advice of George Washington “to steer clear of permanent
alliances with any portion of the foreign world”

Ehrenfeld, Rachael; Clinton's Iranian Connection, January 5, 2009, http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/02/alavi-
The Phyllis Schlafly Report, April 1998 revealed that NATO Expansion was an
important part of Clinton’s 1996 campaign in cities with large communities of ethnic voters.
The New York Times wrote, on March 30, 1998, that U.S. weapons contractors spent $51
million lobbying for the NATO Expansion Treaty. Their motivation was to make billions of
dollars selling arms and military equipment to the new NATO nations. The weapons
manufacturers funneled an additional $32.3 million equally to Republican and Democrat
Congressional candidates. In 1996, the U.S. arms industry lobbied a bill through Congress to
force American taxpayers to guarantee loans for weapons exports. (New York Times, March 30,
While in office, Clinton also used his position to take away states rights and private land
ownership rights with his proposed Rivers Initiative in his 1997 State of the Union Message.
Clinton issued Executive Order 13061 on September 11, 1997. It would have allowed the federal
government to take over rivers and their adjacent lands under the American Heritage Rivers
Initiative (AHRI). Clinton financed AHRI by diverting funds from 12 federal departments and
agencies. Thankfully, Representative Helen Chenoweth (R-ID), subsequently introduced H.R.
1842 to stop Clinton’s Rivers Initiative, and as of 2009, only fourteen rivers are designated
American Heritage Rivers. 15
Under the original initiative, one hundred fourteen rivers would have been included by
the year 2000 to institute national land-use planning and zoning over large portions of land along
certain U.S. rivers. The plan superseded constitutional state’s jurisdiction, restricting the property
rights of private property owners, by putting the adjacent land under the control of federal
Under the AHRI process, local communities would nominate enough rivers to allow the
President to choose the rivers he wanted. The President’s Council on Environmental Quality
subsequently makes plans for the future of the chosen rivers and the property alongside it. The
Council on Environmental Quality would then appoint an American Heritage Rivers Interagency
Committee to make recommendations to the President for the land control, potentially
earmarking it for crony pork-barrel connections.

“American Heritage Rivers,” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Heritage_Rivers
Clinton’s original AHRI would have authorized the appointment of ten river czars, or
River Navigators, with and ten more appointed each succeeding year, to be paid a yearly salary
of $100,000. Their jobs would be to guide the local citizens through the federal programs.
Opponents of AHRI claimed it violated constitutional and statutory law, imposed federal
bureaucracy reducing the influence of states, restricted private property rights, and interfered
with private owner and state economic activity. 16
Clinton did, however issue an executive order to hold up 1.7 million acres of Utah land
containing the largest reserve of high-quality coal and minerals in the continental U.S. Known as
the Kaiporowitz coalfield, one of the premier coalfields in the United States and perhaps the
world, the undeveloped Kaiporowitz coalfield contains approximately sixty-two billion tons of
high BTU rating, clean burning, low-sulfur hard coal worth a trillion dollars. According to Dr.
Lee Allison, Utah state geologist, the coal is very compliant and burns so cleanly that it exceeds
the requirements of the Clean Air Act. Removing the huge natural resource from commercial
availability tremendously enhanced the value of the world’s second largest source of
environmentally safe coal on the Indonesian island of Kalimantan, which is partly owned by
members of Muslim Indonesia's very successful ethnic Chinese minority, friends of Clinton, the
Indonesian Riadys. 17
Mochtar Riady is an ethnic Chinese who founded the Lippo group. In 1984, the Lippo
Group purchased the Bank of Trade in Los Angeles, which became a Lippo Bank subsidiary. 18
The Lippo Bank in L.A. was implicated for giving millions of dollars to Clinton’s presidential
campaigns in 1992 and 1996. According to a 1998 Senate Governmental Affairs Committee
report, the Lippo Bank in California raised illegal foreign money for the Democratic National
Party through Lippo-owned shell companies that were ultimately traced to the greater China

Schlafly Phyllis; “Will America be Caught in Clinton’s Web,” The Phyllis Schlafly Report, Volume 31, No. 9,
April 1998, http://www.eagleforum.org/psr/1998/apr98/psrapr98.html
Bresnahan, David; “Utah’s Protests of U.S. Land Grab Muted,” May 15, 1998,
“Campaign Finance Key Player: The Lippo Group,” http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-
“Lippo Bank,” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lippo_Banking_Group
Clinton’s Executive Order, EO 13107 on Implementation of Human Rights Treaties was
an attempt to bypass the constitutional requirement that U.S. treaties be ratified by the Senate. It
set up a framework to obligate the U.S. under UN treaties on human rights. There are several
unratified UN human rights treaties that could be imposed under EO 13107.
Implementation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights refuses to
recognize one of the most fundamental American economic rights, the right to own property.
This U.N. treaty tries to bind the U.S. to take steps to use all of our resources in order to achieve
“full realization” to provide food, clothing and housing for everyone in the world, obligating us
“to ensure an equitable distribution of world food supplies in relation to need.”
The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child would bring about massive UN
interference in family life, education, daycare, health care, and standard of living, setting up a
committee of ten “experts.” Because the UN is dominated by Islamic countries, it is likely that
such experts will be Islamic “scholars.”
The UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women
(CEDAW) would require us to follow the Arab dominated U.N. dictates about “customs and
practices,” “social and cultural patterns of conduct of men and women,” “family education,” and
even revision of textbooks.
Other Clinton Executive Orders include EO 12919 of June 3, 1994, entitled National
Defense Industrial Resources Preparedness, which asserts plenary and dictatorial authority over
citizens, food, transportation, energy, health, contracts, materials and resources to be exercised
by the National Security Council and FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 20
The Law of the land and Sea Treaty would impose international bureaucracy on
commerce, shipping lanes, mineral resources, fishing rights, environmental concerns. President
Bill Clinton signed the Law of the land and Sea Treaty in 1994 and sent it to the U.S. Senate, but
it has yet to achieve the majority vote for passing.21 One of the reasons the Law of the land and
Sea Treaty is dangerous, is that it will compromise American sovereignty regarding oil.

Schlafly Phyllis; “Power Grab Through Executive Orders,” The Phyllis Schlafly Report, Volume 32, No. 10,
April 1998, http://www.eagleforum.org/psr/1999/may99/psrmay99.html
Porter, Keith; “Law of the Sea Treaty,” September 7, 2009,
Hilary Clinton, currently President Obama’s Secretary of State, believes it is a top
priority to ratify the UN Law of the Sea Treaty, which will also establish a global tax to gain
access to oil, gas, and minerals in the oceans. Russia is claiming ownership of 460,000 square
miles of Arctic territory with huge reserves of oil and gas, so the U.S. State Department wants to
turn the treaty over to the Arab dominated UN, when documentary evidence exists showing that
Americans have legitimate claims to the resources in the Arctic region near Alaska.22
Accusations that the Saudi government used charities as front organizations to fund
international terrorism are long-standing. They surfaced in the early eighties when U.S.
intelligence officials first warned Congress that the Saudis were directly funding terrorist groups.
The Clinton administration stopped a 1995 investigation after Islamic charities were
targeted for diverting cash to groups that fund terrorism. The investigations would have exposed
Saudi Arabia’s suspected ties to global money-laundering efforts to raise millions of dollars for
Four interrelated Islamic foundations, institutes and charities in Virginia with more than a
billion dollars in assets donated via the Saudi Arabian government were allowed to continue
under a veil of secrecy according to Former federal prosecutor John J. Loftus, a St. Petersburg,
Florida lawyer who later filed the Loftus suit in 2002 under the Florida Consumer Protection
Act. Loftus accused the Saudi government of diverting cash to terrorists in a massive scheme
involving charities in Virginia and Florida. Loftus said:

“If federal agents had been allowed to conduct the investigation they
wanted in 1995, they would have made the connection between the Saudi
government and those charities.” 23

After the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, an interagency task force
was created to investigate ties between charitable organizations in the United States and terrorist
groups abroad. Investigations focused on allegations that tax-exempt and nonprofit charities
operating out of the United States from Virginia to Florida contributed millions of dollars to
international terrorist groups including the Islamic Jihad and Hamas. The same investigations
Letter by Cliff Kincaid, President of America’s Survival, Inc,

Seper, Jerry; “Clinton White House Axed Terror-Fund Probe,” The Washington Times, April 2,
also revealed that a Pakistani charity that transferred $100,000 to Mohamed Atta, one of the 19 al
Qaeda hijackers in the September 11, 2001 attacks, was funded by the Saudi government. That
information had helped U.S. officials identify the 19 hijackers, 15 of whom were from Saudi
Non-transparency of donations to Bill Clinton by Islamists conceals the extent of Bill
Clinton’s involvement in the Islamization of the U.S. That the World Trade Center was
destroyed just after Clinton’s administration may have been no coincidence. It could have been
an effort to destroy evidence of corrupt business dealings during and prior to Clinton’s
administration and keep secret who the world’s real imperialists are.
Bill Clinton’s policies are known to have effected education, financial institutions,
environmental regulations and oil production. Clinton’s willingness to accept money from anti-
Democratic Islamic sources combined with the non-transparency of Shari’ah financing should be
cause for concern because it could be tantamount to treason. It is not surprising that Clinton shut
down investigations of Islamic charities. Under Islamic law Clinton could actually be considered
an Islamic charity. Therefore it would not be surprising if examination of Islamic source
donations to Clinton reveal bribery and support for terrorism.