Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
In pro se
NANCI MEEK
3308 Ariba St
Las Vegas NV 89129
Telephone: (760) 413-5660
Petitioner in Pro Se
STATE OF HAWAII
relief that the 1st Amendment to the 1996 ELVIN R MEEK TRUST, the first
dated September 16, 1997 and executed in Honolulu Hawaii and included
in the original Petition For Declatory Relief Declaring the 1st Amendment
Invalid dated December 2008 (Exhibit “A”) and the second 1st
1
signed in California have concluded the signatures are fraudulent.
See Exhibit “C”. Also the document has no notary witness and no
page numbers.
of Elvin R Meek For The Benefit of Elvin R Meek executed and dated
June 14, 1996 (Exhibit “D”) is a true and accurate document and
with several fraud actions in San Luis Obispo County, is not the true
and accurate 1st Amendment. The pages on the 1st Amendment are
not numbered.
4) The Elvin R Meek and Elizabeth A Meek Living Trust dated January
10, 1992 is a true and accurate document. (See Exhibit “F”) This
2
Dee Meek (Reklai) however in 1996 our father removed Elizabeth
Meek and 1/6 to Lola Dee Meek; According to several others this
September of 2003.
20, 2004 four months after our father passed away supports our
which only refers to the Elvin R and Elizabeth A Meek Living Trust
dated January 10, 1992 and not the 1996 Trust, or the
true instrument enabling her to cash out our father’s Union Bank Cal
Trust. The stocks were also included as assets in the Elvin R Meek
1996 original trust, however the 1996 trust instrument had named
3
check into the Bank of Hawaii in April of 2004. Attached as Exhibit
2005 just prior to selling the property located at 469 Ena Road
February of 2004. At the same time the law firm for Bank of Hawaii,
to the 1996 trust. The inconsistencies with both the Affidavits and
and her attorney Robert Jones were knowingly and with impunity
4
attempting to dissolve our father’s estate without our knowledge
time.” We have never in the 15 years Elizabeth Meek was with our
father had any cross words with her. (See Exhibit “K”).
believe it was his intent to dissolve the estate utilizing the 1st
5
scrutiny does nothing more than support our allegations he
6
1. That the original Forensics Report prepared by Reed Hayes be
2. That the court consider our allegations that the 1st Amendment to
effort to support the 2nd Amendment and Last Will And Testament
supports the original Petition For Declatory Relief Declaring the 1st
Declaring 1st Amendment Invalid filed January 12, 2009 see Exhibit
“P”.
7
in Honolulu, Hawaii on June 14, 1996 to be the true and accurate
document.
I certify that the forgoing is true and correct, and that each of the
attachments are true and correct copies under penalty of perjury under
_______________________
Nanci Meek Petitioner
Self Represented