Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
A Montney Cre
Report synopsis: The Montney gas resource play, which expands across northwestern Alberta into northeastern B.C., continues to see an increase in drilling activity, an improvement in type curves and a resulting step change in economics. Within this report, we look at five small to mid-cap Montney producers with the assets, upside and valuations, which justify our bullish stance on this play. Why Montney matters Horizontal wells in the Montney continue to dominate gas targeted drilling in Western Canada. Completions continue to improve resulting in a step change in well economics. Advantage Oil & Gas (BUY, $8.00 TP) Upper and lower Montney provide an inventory of low risk development while the middle Montney has the potential to double inventory. Three-year development plan should grow production at a 21% CAGR. Delphi Energy (BUY, $4.25 TP) Some of the most economic Montney gas wells in Western Canada. Debt levels have peaked, the company is undergoing significant transformation. Donnycreek Energy (BUY, $3.00 TP) Small cap, cheap way to play the Montney at Kakwa in Alberta. Expanding resource upside with Upper Montney wells. Painted Pony Petroleum (BUY, $14.75 TP) 7 TCFe of discovered gas in place across northeastern B.C. acreage. Well positioned to be either an LNG supplier or take-out candidate. Storm Resources (BUY, $6.75 TP) Top tier management team leads 4th iteration. Company is entering significant growth phase and looking to further consolidate the Umbach area of northeast B.C.
Prepared by GMP Securities L.P. See important disclosures on the last page of this report
B.C.
Alberta
Storm Umbach
Donnycreek Kakwa/Wapiti
Delphi Bigstone
2015E Valuation 2015E Production Company Advantage Oil & Gas Delphi Energy Donnycreek Energy Painted Pony Petroleum Storm Resources (boe/d) (% Gas) 27,134 97% 12,116 69% 3,726 48% 18,363 85% 8,526 80% Risked NAV ($/sh) (P/NAV) $8.51 0.7x $6.53 0.5x $4.37 0.5x $17.65 0.6x $8.42 0.6x EV/DACF EV/Prod'n Total D/CF (x) 6.9x 7.1x 3.1x 9.9x 10.3x ($/boe/d) $52,123 $53,885 $37,988 $72,671 $79,754 (x) 1.7x 1.6x 0.5x 1.9x 1.1x
Source: National Energy Board (NEB) Montney report published November 6, 2013
Based on a somewhat dated ultimate recovery potential study released on the Montney in 2012, between B.C. and Alberta, there is nearly 450 TCF of marketable gas from the Montney, enough to meet over 100 years of current Canadian gas demand. When we factor in the associated NGLs and oil, based on the expected case, there is nearly 80 billion barrels of equivalent marketable resource from the formation, making the Montney one of the largest hydrocarbon deposits in the world. Montney unconventional potential in B.C. and Alberta (as of 2012)
In Place Marketable Hydrocarbon Low Expected High Low Expected Natural gas (tcf) 3,197 4,274 5,405 316 449 NGL's (mmbbls) 87,360 126,931 176,783 1,540 2,308 Oil (mmbbls) 80,949 141,469 227,221 452 1,125 Barrel Equivalent (mmboe) 701,142 980,733 1,304,837 54,659 78,266 Source: National Energy Board (NEB) Montney report published November 6, 2013
Follow the money Montney drilling continues to attract majority of gas directed investment dollars In terms of producer capital allocation, the Montney formation is seeing by far the most capital allocation of all the natural gas resource plays in Western Canada. Assuming an average well cost of $6 million, we estimate 2013 saw over $4 billion in producer capital. From a pure licensing perspective, we estimate 2013 saw over 1,000 Montney gas wells licensed across Western Canada, nearly tentimes the amount of the next closest formation. In fact, licensing activity in the Montney was greater than the next nine formations combined. As a result of the increased drilling activity in the formation, we have witnessed a corresponding exponential increase in production from the formation. In the production exhibits below, we highlight hydrocarbon production exclusively from the Montney horizontal well bores. It is interesting to see how free condensate volumes have increased more recently, which we believe reflects the fact producer dollars are focused on the areas providing the highest liquids content. 2013 Western Canadian gas licensing activity Montney dominates
1050 875 700 2013 licenses YoY change 165% 130% 95% 60% 25% -10% -45%
2013 licenses
YoY change
3000 Oil production Condensate 2625 2250 1875 1500 1125 750 375 0
2003-01 2003-05 2003-09 2004-01 2004-05 2004-09 2005-01 2005-05 2005-09 2006-01 2006-05 2006-09 2007-01 2007-05 2007-09 2008-01 2008-05 2008-09 2009-01 2009-05 2009-09 2010-01 2010-05 2010-09 2011-01 2011-05 2011-09 2012-01 2012-05 2012-09 2013-01 2013-05 2013-09 2014-01 Horizotnal well count
2,000,000
2,000
1,500,000
1,500
1,000,000
1,000
500,000
500
0
2003-01 2003-05 2003-09 2004-01 2004-05 2004-09 2005-01 2005-05 2005-09 2006-01 2006-05 2006-09 2007-01 2007-05 2007-09 2008-01 2008-05 2008-09 2009-01 2009-05 2009-09 2010-01 2010-05 2010-09 2011-01 2011-05 2011-09 2012-01 2012-05 2012-09 2013-01 2013-05 2013-09 2014-01
2) Economics are undergoing a major transformation Now that producers have de-risked the most prospective Montney areas, the focus has shifted to improving the type curves and economics. Generally speaking, a number of producers are moving to a ball-drop completion technique, which has not only reduced completion costs, it has resulted in a material improvement to production type curves and ultimately economics. In the table below we display the impacts of four different Montney plays where the producers have recently shifted to a new completion method. The new completions are significantly increasing production rates, which is transferring to an improvement in well economics, with the average payout cut by more than half. Delphis Montney wells at Bigstone have undergone the most significant transformation as the old wells (gelled oil fracs) were marginally profitable and took over 4 years to pay out, compared to the new wells (hybrid slickwater fracs), which are massively economic, with an estimated payout of 6 months. Impact of new completion techniques on well performance and economics
Old
Well Perfromance
DEE - Bigstone
New
Old
PPY - Townsend
New
SRX- Umbach
New
AAV- Glacier
New
4,689 73 $1.6 53
4,381 14 $4.5 38
7,024 14 $9.7 14
4,244 36 $5.9 15
5,147 0 $4.0 23
3) Montney is seen as the leading formation for LNG feedstock To date, the National Energy Board has received eleven applications for west coast LNG export licenses, for a total capacity of 21.2 bcf/d. Of the eleven, eight have been approved, with combined export capacity of 15.1 bcf/d, while the remaining four, which are still in the regulatory process, could add an incremental 5.1 bcf/d. While many of the project proponents already possess the upstream assets required for their facilities, four projects with a combined capacity of 4.0 Bcf/d (Woodfibre LNG Export Pte. Ltd., Jordan cove LNG L.P., Triton LNG L.P., and Kitsault Energy Ltd) lack the dedicated resources to supply their LNG projects, hinting these companies will be in the market for supply. LNG export license applications
Project KM LNG Operating General Partnership BC LNG Export Co-operative LLC LNG Canada Development Inc Pacific Northwest LNG Ltd WCC LNG Ltd Prince Rupert LNG Exports Ltd Woodfibre LNG Export Pte. Ltd. Jordan Cove LNG L.P. Triton LNG L.P. Kitsault Energy Ltd. Aurora Liquefied Natural Gas Ltd. Company/Ownership Apache/Chevron Haisla Nation/LNG Partners LLC Shell/PetroChina/Mitsubishi Corp/Korea Gas Corp Petronas - Progress/JAPEX/PetroluemBRUNEI Imperial Oil Resources Ltd/ExxonMobil Canada Ltd British Gas Group (BG) Pacific Oil & Gas Ltd Veresen Inc Altagas Pacific Partnership/Indemiitsu Kosan Co Ltd Kitsault Energy Ltd. CNOOC/INPEX Gas BC Ltd Export License Approved Approved Approved Approved Approved Approved Approved Approved Under Review Under Review Under Review Capacity (BCF/D) 1.3 0.2 3.2 2.6 3.9 2.8 0.3 0.8 0.3 2.6 3.2 21.2
Source: Bloomberg
MONTNEY SCORECARD
Breakdown of covered companies Montney plays
AAV
Montney Play / Area Glacier Upper Montney $5.50 $3.65 0.7x 26 858 0 0% 0.82
AAV
Glacier Middle Montney $6.60 $4.56 0.7x 26 704 39 19% 0.78
AAV
Glacier Lower Montney $5.80 $4.92 0.8x 24 704 10 6% 0.90
DEE
Bigstone Upper/ Middle Montney $9.20 $13.73 1.5x 9 1,090 108 39% 1.23
DCK
PPY
SRX
ARX
BIR
CR
CQE
Simonette Upper Montney $7.50 $5.34 0.7x 28 921 30 15% 0.98
NVA
NVA
POU
POU
Well costs NPV PIR Payout IP (30) IP (30) liquids content IP (30) liquids content EUR
Blair & Parkland Townsend Kakwa Upper / Umbach - Middle & Middle Upper Lower Middle Montney Montney Montney Montney $10.00 $7.20 $5.00 $5.25 $9.88 $6.59 $5.91 $5.65 1.0x 0.9x 1.2x 1.1x 19 22 15 10 855 150 47% 0.88 893 14 8% 1.21 860 36 18% 0.88 767 25 13% 1.04
Septimus Pouce Upper, Coupe - Middle and Lower Lower Montney Montney $6.00 $4.70 $4.06 $3.91 0.7x 0.8x 32 11 597 6 3% 0.90 906 30 15% 0.90
Musereau / Kakwa Karr / Gold 100 Bilbo South Bilbo North Creek bbls/mmcf Montney Montney Montney Montney $9.00 $9.00 $8.00 $8.00 $9.51 $7.00 $5.37 $12.25 1.1x 0.8x 0.7x 1.5x 14 21 23 8 1,270 105 39% 0.89 1,318 73 30% 0.93 1,083 50 23% 0.74 1,333 100 38% 0.91
Profit - Investment Ratio 1.6x 1.4x Profit Investment Ratio 1.2x 1.0x 0.8x 0.6x 0.4x 0.2x 0.0x PIR Average
18,000
60%
12,000
40%
6,000
20%
AAV
PPY
DEE
SRX
DCK
0%
% gas
Donnycreek Energy What we like: Appear to have a top quality land position in one of the most liquids-rich areas of the Montney gas fairway. Majority of drilling activity has focused on the Middle Montney interval, while the most recent well successfully tested the Upper Montney, resulting in a potential doubling of the companys drilling inventory. Has the largest contiguous land base in the Montney prospective Wapiti area. Early well results suggest there is much more work to be done here but, if successful, we believe this is the ticket to the company being acquired. Cautionary notes: Small cap producer in a capital-intense play (wells cost upwards of $10 million), meaning until the company reaches a higher critical mass, access to capital will be important to play development. Painted Pony Petroleum What we like: LNG upside: 7.0 tcfe of contingent resource and a clear line of sight to the West Coast. Type curves have seen a material improvement with the recent switch to ball-drop completion technology. Operational momentum clearly in Painted Ponys favour as the company recently increased 2014 average production guidance by nearly 15% on the back of initial production rates from four new wells. Cautionary notes: LNG projects and timelines are uncertain and 5-year growth plan may be scaled back if the company does not have required capital. Storm Resources What we like: Proven management team with a history of value creation over the previous 3 iterations of Storm. Potential to be a consolidator in the Umbach area; acquired Montney assets from Yoho in January 2014. Conservative reserve bookings leave considerable unbooked upside reserve bookings are currently based on 8% of Storms Umbach land position. Cautionary notes: Well economics are driven by liquids yields, which exhibit significant variability. Good news is liquids rates are trending in the right direction.
150%
2014E 2015E
60%
CFPS Growth (%)
100%
40%
50% 20%
0%
DCK
KEL
PPY
CQE
BIR
DEE
RTK
SRX
PNE
AAV
CTA
CR
NVA
0%
DCK
KEL
PNE
AAV
DEE
PPY
CQE
NVA
BIR
SRX
RTK
CTA
CR
Netbacks and cost structure: Low-cost structure and strong realised pricing help drive asset profitability. Therefore, it should come as no surprise those companies with a higher weighting to liquids and low-cost structure are forecast to have the strongest cash flow netbacks. The average forecast 2014 cash flow netback for the group is $23.15/boe, with our new names falling right in line. Given the relatively low finding costs in the Montney, we believe these producers will continue to deliver strong recycle ratios.
$30
Cashflow netbacks ($/boe)
75%
Gas weight (%)
$12
$20
50%
$8
$10
25%
$4 $0 DCK CTA BIR KEL RTK NVA CR AAV SRX PPY CQE DEE PNE STE $0 AAV CTA PNE CQE BIR SRX KEL PPY NVA DEE CR RTK STE DCK 2014E 2015E Gas Weight 0%
Valuations: When comparing the relative valuations of the five companies with the larger peer group, we note that on average the Montney producers tend to trade at higher multiples. Painted Pony and Storm have of the three highest EV/DACF multiples in the group. The same can be said when looking at the valuation multiple from a production metric standpoint. Given the Monteny resource potential, operational momentum, and recent type curve improvements seen in the play, we do feel any sort of premium valuation multiple is justified. On average, our junior-intermediate gassy names trade at a 2014 EV/DACF multiple of 9.2x; this falls to 7.5x in 2015 on the back of a strong group growth profile. On average, our new Montney names trade at a slight premium in 2014 (9.8x), but given the better than average projected growth profiles, they trade at a slight discount in 2015 (7.4x). Comparative valuation metrics
16.0x 14.0x 12.0x
EV/DACF EV/boe/d 2014E
2014E 2015E
2014E 2015E
10.0x 8.0x 6.0x 4.0x 2.0x 0.0x CTA PNE BIR AAV CQE CR DCK DEE RTK STE NVA PPY SRX KEL
CR
What are you paying for from a NAV basis? From a standpoint of resource upside potential, our new Montney producers are trading at a premium to their Base NAV (outside of DCK, but we believe this discount is due to the recent results from their Wapiti Montney play), meaning the market is giving these names value for their unbooked upside. In terms of relative value to Risked NAV, Delphi appears most attractive as the stock is trading at a slight premium to its Base NAV, which only includes 21 non-producing East Bigstone locations (representing roughly 2.5 years of drilling activity), signifying the reserve report is not aggressive by any means. Current share price relative to their NAVs
$18.00 Risked Upside NAV Base NAV Current Price $18.00
$13.50
$13.50
$9.00
$9.00
$4.50
$4.50
$0.00
Balance sheet: Generally speaking, balance sheet strength amongst our gas-weighted juniors and intermediates is pretty healthy, thanks to strong first quarter pricing. On average, the group is carrying a trailing 2014 D/CF ratio of 1.2x, with our new names falling in line with this average. On a utilization basis, the new Montney names have drawn roughly 70% of their bank line, although we suspect lending lines will be expanded given the fact reserve reports have recently been updated. Comparative balance sheet metrics
2.0x
2014E 2015E
-$5,000 $0 $5,000 NVA $10,000 $15,000 CQE DEE CTA BIR RTK 100% 80% 60% Bank line utilization 40% 20% 0% CR DCK SRX AAV KEL
1.5x
1.0x
D/CF
Net debt/boe/d
PPY
STE
0.5x
0.0x
BIR
CR
DEE RTK
-0.5x
$20,000 120%
NAV/share
1 GMP
Securities L.P. and/or any of its group affiliated companies has, within the previous 12 months, provided paid investment banking services or acted as underwriter to the issuer. 2 The analyst has visited material operations of the company. The issuer and/or GMP clients paid all or a portion of the travel expenses associated with the analysts site visit to its material operations. 3 non-voting 4 subordinate-voting 5 restricted-voting 6 multiple-voting 7 The analyst who prepared this report has viewed the material operations of this issuer. 8 The analyst who prepared this research report owns this issuer's securities. 9 limited voting 10 GMP Securities L.P. owns 1% or more of this issuers securities. * The analyst is related to a member of the Board of Directors of the issuer, but that individual has no influence in the preparation of this report. **[Other disclosure] The information contained in this report is drawn from sources believed to be reliable but the accuracy or completeness of the information is not guaranteed, nor in providing it does GMP Securities L.P. (GMP) assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever. Information on which this report is based is available upon request. This report is not to be construed as an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities. GMP and/or affiliated companies or persons may as principal or agent, buy and sell securities mentioned herein, including options, futures or other derivative instruments thereon. Griffiths McBurney Corp., an affiliate of GMP, accepts responsibility for the contents of this research subject to the foregoing. U.S. clients wishing to effect transactions in any security referred to herein should do so through Griffiths McBurney Corp. GMP will provide upon request a statement of its financial condition and a list of the names of its directors and senior officers. GMP. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. 145 King Street West, Suite 300 Toronto, Ontario M5H 1J8 Tel: (416) 367-8600; Fax: (416) 943-6134. Each research analyst and associate research analyst who authored this document and whose name appears herein certifies that (1) the recommendations and opinions expressed in the research report accurately reflect their personal views about any and all of the securities or issuers discussed herein that are within their coverage universe and (2) no part of their compensation was, is or will be, directly or indirectly, related to the provision of specific recommendations or views expressed herein. GMP Analysts are compensated competitively based on several criteria, including performance assessment criteria based on quality of research. The Analyst compensation pool is comprised of several revenue sources, including, sales and trading and investment banking. GMP Securities L.P. prohibits any director, officer, employee or Canadian agent of GMP from holding any office in publicly traded companies or any office in private companies in the financial services industry. All relevant disclosures required by IIROC Rule 3400, GMPs recommendation statistics and research dissemination policies can be obtained at www.gmpsecurities.com or by calling GMPs Compliance Department. The GMP research recommendation structure consists of the following ratings: Buy. A Buy rating reflects 1) bullish conviction on the part of the analyst; and 2) typically a 15% or greater return to target. Speculative Buy. A Speculative Buy rating reflects 1) bullish conviction on the part of the analyst accompanied by a substantially higher than normal risk, including the possibility of a binary outcome; and 2) typically a 30% or greater return to target. Hold. A Hold rating reflects 1) a lack of bullish or bearish conviction on the part of the analyst; and 2) typically a return of 0 to 20%. Reduce. A Reduce rating reflects 1) bearish conviction on the part of the analyst; and 2) typically a 5% or lower return to target. Tender. Clients are advised to tender their shares to a takeover bid.