Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 3

4/8/2014

my.safaribooksonline.com/print?xmlid=9780470888445%2Fsection_134

Username: kaushik mada Book: Student Solutions Manual Applied Statistics and Probability f or Engineers, Fif th Edition. No part of any chapter or book may be reproduced or transmitted in any f orm by any means without the prior written permission f or reprints and excerpts f rom the publisher of the book or chapter. Redistribution or other use that v iolates the f air use priv ilege under U.S. copy right laws (see 17 USC107) or that otherwise v iolates these Terms of Serv ice is strictly prohibited. Violators will be prosecuted to the f ull extent of U.S. Federal and Massachusetts laws.

Section 13-4
13-35. The output from Minitab follows.

S o u r c e F a c t o r B l o c k E r r o r T o t a l S=2 . 5 7 4
13-37. a)

D F S S M S F P 2 1 9 5 2 . 6 4 9 7 6 . 3 2 2 1 4 7 . 3 5 0 . 0 0 0 1 1 1 9 8 . 5 4 1 8 . 0 4 9 2 . 7 2 0 . 0 2 2 2 2 1 4 5 . 7 7 6 . 6 2 6 3 5 2 2 9 6 . 9 5 R S q=9 3 . 6 5 % R S q ( a d j )=8 9 . 9 0 %

Because the P -value for the factor is near zero there are significant differences in the factor level means at = 0.05 or = 0.01.

A n a l y s i so fV a r i a n c ef o rS H A P E S o u r c e D F S S M S N O Z Z L E 4 0 . 1 0 2 1 8 0 0 . 0 2 5 5 4 5 V E L O C I T Y 5 0 . 0 6 2 8 6 7 0 . 0 1 2 5 7 3 E r r o r 2 0 0 . 0 5 7 3 0 0 0 . 0 0 2 8 6 5 T o t a l 2 9 0 . 2 2 2 3 4 7
Reject H 0; nozzle type affects shape measurement.

F P 8 . 9 2 0 . 0 0 0 4 . 3 9 0 . 0 0 7

F i s h e r ' sp a i r w i s ec o m p a r i s o n s F a m i l ye r r o rr a t e=0 . 2 6 8 I n d i v i d u a le r r o rr a t e=0 . 0 5 0 0 C r i t i c a lv a l u e=2 . 0 6 0 I n t e r v a l sf o r( c o l u m nl e v e lm e a n )( r o wl e v e lm e a n ) 1 2 3 4 2 0 . 1 5 4 1 2 0 . 0 1 0 7 9 3 0 . 2 0 2 4 6 0 . 1 3 0 7 9 0 . 0 3 7 5 4 0 . 0 3 4 1 2 4 0 . 2 4 4 1 2 0 . 1 7 2 4 6 0 . 1 2 4 1 2 0 . 0 7 9 2 1 0 . 0 0 7 5 4 0 . 0 4 0 7 9 5 0 . 1 1 4 1 2 0 . 0 4 2 4 6 0 . 0 0 5 8 8 0 . 0 4 7 5 4 0 . 0 5 0 7 9 0 . 1 2 2 4 6 0 . 1 7 0 7 9 0 . 2 1 2 4 6 T h e r ea r es i g n i f i c a n td i f f e r e n c e sb e t w e e nl e v e l s1a n d3 ;4 ;2a n d4 ;3a n d 5 ;a n d4a n d5 .


b) c) The residual analysis shows that there is some inequality of variance. The normal probability plot is acceptable.

http://my.safaribooksonline.com/print?xmlid=9780470888445%2Fsection_134

1/3

4/8/2014

my.safaribooksonline.com/print?xmlid=9780470888445%2Fsection_134

13-39. a)

A n a l y s i so fV a r i a n c ef o rA R S E N I C S o u r c e D F S S M S T E S T 2 0 . 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 S U B J E C T 3 0 . 0 2 1 2 2 5 0 0 . 0 0 7 0 7 5 0 E r r o r 6 0 . 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 2 3 3 3 T o t a l 1 1 0 . 0 2 4 0 2 5 0
Fail to reject H 0; there is no evidence of differences between the tests.

F 3 . 0 0 3 0 . 3 2

P 0 . 1 2 5 0 . 0 0 1

b) Some indication of variability increasing with the magnitude of the response.

http://my.safaribooksonline.com/print?xmlid=9780470888445%2Fsection_134

2/3

4/8/2014

my.safaribooksonline.com/print?xmlid=9780470888445%2Fsection_134

13-41. A version of the electronic data file has the reading for length 4 and width 5 as 2. It should be 20.

A n a l y s i so fV a r i a n c ef o rL E A K A G E S o u r c e D F S S M S L E N G T H 3 7 2 . 6 6 2 4 . 2 2 W I D T H 4 9 0 . 5 2 2 2 . 6 3 E r r o r 1 2 1 8 0 . 8 3 1 5 . 0 7 T o t a l 1 9 3 4 4 . 0 1
a)

F 1 . 6 1 1 . 5 0

P 0 . 2 4 0 0 . 2 6 3

Fail to reject H 0, mean leakage voltage does not depend on the channel length. b) One unusual observation in width 5, length 4. There are some problems with the normal probability plot, including the unusual observation.

c) Analysis of Variance for LEAKAGE VOLTAGE

S o u r c e L E N G T H W I D T H E r r o r T o t a l

D F 3 4 1 2 1 9

S S M S 8 . 1 7 7 5 2 . 7 2 5 8 6 . 8 3 8 0 1 . 7 0 9 5 5 . 3 1 0 0 0 . 4 4 2 5 2 0 . 3 2 5 5

F P 6 . 1 6 0 . 0 0 9 3 . 8 6 0 . 0 3 1

Reject H 0. And conclude that the mean leakage voltage does depend on channel length. By removing the data point that was erroneous, the analysis results in a conclusion. The erroneous data point that was an obvious outlier had a strong effect the results of the experiment. 13-43. a) Because MS = SS/df(Factor), df(Factor) = SS/MS = 126.880/63.4401 = 2. The number of levels = df(Factor) + 1 = 2 + 1 = 3. Therefore, 3 levels of the factor were used. b) Because df(Total) = df(Factor) + df(Block) + df(Error) 11 = 3 + df(Block) + 6. Therefore, df(Block) = 2. Therefore, 3 blocks were used in the experiment. c) From parts (a) and (b), df(Factor) = 3 and df(Block) = 2 SS(Error) = df(Error)MS(Error) = (6)2.7403 = 16.4418 F = MS(Factor)/MS(Error) = 63.4401/2.7403 = 23.15 From Appendix Table VI, P -value < 0.01 d) Because the P -value < 0.01 we reject H 0. There are significant differences in the factor level means at = 0.05 or = 0.01.

http://my.safaribooksonline.com/print?xmlid=9780470888445%2Fsection_134

3/3

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi