Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Cleaning workers score ballots rating ve ofces from the cleanest to the dirtiest.
Page 1
We now had a ranking of dirtiest to cleanest ofce, based on the visual judgement of 25 people. The dirtiest ofce (based on appearance) was Room 103, the cleanest ofce Room 102. Now we began the second part of the exercise. We used an electronic scale to weigh an empty and clean ProTeam micro lter liner. The Team number, room number and its empty weight were written on the liner with a permanent marker. The scale was loaned to us by Lab Manager Mike Thompson of the WFU Chemistry Department. The model selected has a weight range of up to 120g which is enough for our purposes in the experiment. The Pro6 size 6 quart liner worked best on the scale that we used. A styrofoam plate was placed on the pan of the scale so that no part of the liner could inadvertently touch the top of the scale, affecting the reading. Each team was then dispatched to their assigned room to carry out detail, core, or cleaning for health type cleaning. The Team Leader was to ensure that the room was vacuumed cornertocorner, and the support personnel helped the vacuum specialist move furniture. (Continued on next page)
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Julian Castillo The University of Texas at Austin Melody Hartford Rappahannock Goodwill Industries Nick Pangaro KBM Facility Solutions Chris Romero Sandia National Labs Matthew Lawrence Wake Forest University Mark Samios Cleaning Alliance Representative PortionPac
Page 2
When each team returned from vacuuming, the micro lter liner lter was carefully reweighed. The second weight was written on the liner with a permanent marker. Now we collected all of our data onto a chart on the whiteboard.
Micro Filter Liner Empty Weight 29.76 29.42 29.82 29.63 29.97 After Vacuuming Weight 39.41 65.53 100.06 72.29 64.02 Weight of Soil Collected 9.65 36.11 70.24 42.66 34.05 Soil/SF Room Square (grams per Foootage square foot) 75 110 120 120 140 0.129 0.328 0.585 0.356 0.243
NOTICE
Room Room 101 Room 102 Room 103 Room 104 Room 105
We wrote the Micro Filter Liner Empty Weight and After Vacuuming Weight on the chart, then the recorder from each team used a calculator to subtract the rst weight from the second weight. The result was recorded as the Weight of Soil Collected. At this point we discussed what the nding were, but noted that the rooms were not all the same size so it would be necessary to factor in the size of the room to that we could directly compare one rooms score with another. The Room Square Footage had already been calculated and these numbers were provided by the Training Manager. These numbers were added to the chart and the recorders then calculated the Weight of Soil Collected divided by the Room Square Footage to generate a number that was soil (in grams) per square foot. We then discussed what it meant to have an actual number for how soiled the rooms were. We noted that the room that, on average, was visually judged to be the dirtiest actually was the dirtiest in grams per square foot of soil. However, the room visually judged to be the cleanest was the third most dirty out of ve. I then revealed that prior to the meeting I had taken a styrofoam cup from the kitchen, weighed it, and collected soil from the parking lot in it. I weighed the cup again, distributed the contents all over the oor in room 104, then reweighed the cup. I had added 55 grams of soil to the oor before the experiment. At that point we were out of time and I dismissed the class.
Janitor University will be offered once per year from 2014 forward. This decision has been made to ensure ample planning time for prospective students and organizations to coordinate budget and travel. The class will no longer be
Items needed:
Measuring tape (to calculate square footage of the offices) Dry-erase markers Styrofoam cup Dry soil Electronic scale capable of handling up to 120 grams Styrofoam plate ProTeam backpack vacuum cleaners (one per team is ideal) Clean empty micro filter liners Permanent marker Preprinted ballots (one for each participant) Pencils (one for each participant) Calculators (one for each team)
restricted in size and registration for the 2014 session will be open all year.
Page 3
Energy A custodian creates energy when they are performing their job. A custodian could create good energy, which is accomplished from a ritual or a cleansing. A custodian could also create bad energy that comes from wadding the huck towel, over spraying and not having a good cleaning process. The energy that is created affects the environment that inhabitants the area. Have you ever walked on sticky oors, stuck your hand on yesterdays lunch that was left on a table or looked out a window that has the handprint of everyone that has ever entered the room? All of these things will produce bad energy and will make us feel anxious, depressed and wanting to escape. Ritual What is a ritual? It is important to cleanse the energy, cleansing is healing. Healing creates the good energy that customers want while visiting our facilities.
Page 4
In March of 2014, Tim Poskin presented the Three Legged Stool of Cleaning at the 2014 NCAPPA Conference held at Campbell University. Campell University is a coeducational, Baptist university in the U.S. state of North Carolina. GO CAMELS! Most attendees agreed that this years North Carolina Chapter of APPA conference may have been the best one yet. Some of the biggest and best organizations came together to network with business partners and colleagues at Campbell University. Attendees of the Three Legged Stool of Cleaning educational session were presented with the philosophy of the Three Legged Stool of Cleaning that includes an Engineered Process, that is Scientically Validated and provides Professional Training. The attendees were very engaged and had many questions. Some of the questions asked were: How much does it cost? How long does it take? How are people held accountable? Whats the difference between Dilution Control and Portion Control? Some of the attending organizations have already installed a Three Legged
Stool of Cleaning including UNC Chapel Hill. UNC Chapel Hill was the site of the 2006 publicly funded study of traditional housekeeping vs. the (OS1) cleaning process. That study evaluated traditional housekeeping methods vs. a high performance cleaning program over the span of three months at The University of North Carolina.
It was exciting to present the Thee Legged Stool of cleaning to Organizations that struggle with delivering service on a daily basis. Some understood the concept immediately while others struggled with the idea. However to quote Oliver Wendell Holmes, Mans mind, once stretched by a new idea, never regains its original dimensions.
The camel is the mascot of Campbell University, host of the 2014 NCAPPA Conference.
Page 5
LAHH watching the (OS1) Vacuum Specialist training video in Boot Camp.
Nancy, myself and the training room were waiting for them. It was easy, simplied to jump start! Five of the seven Boot Camp participants are individuals with disabilities. Everybody received their own (OS1) Boot Camp handbook. Everybody wrote their names on the front page. No one wanted to lose their book it was their book. The highlights of the (OS1) Boot Camp were the new (OS1) videos. Professionalism, attention to detail, and high quality images made a tremendous impact on the viewers. This is me! and I can be the same! A new career path has started for two new employees with disabilities. A new and a deeper knowledge about their
work has penetrated in ve more expert cleaning workers. The apex was the email received from the auntie of Omery, one of the new employees: Thank you for this opportunity for Omery. He is absolutely overjoyed!!! Omery is one of the many young kids who struggles with reading and writing. But Omery could follow each word communicated to him in Boot Camp because he could understand all the drawings that accompany the (OS1) Boot Camp Handbook. Now he has a cleaning Field Guide that helps me to follow his tasks. Omerys dream to be a custodian has become reality. Thank you ManageMen for allowing all of us to be overjoyed in our work!
Page 6
Ask Maria
QUESTION: I spoke to the Sloan company (manufacturer of the waterless urinal) and they are saying that we should not be using any Germicidal Detergent in them due to it breaking down the internal cartridge life. Do you have any info regarding this issue? ANSWER: With waterless urinals discontinue the use of 1 pump of Stock Solution into the urinal and replace it with the using the 16 oz. PortionPac spray bottle. Apply the properly diluted disinfectant detergent by spraying/misting onto the surface of the urinal and wiping away with the microber cloth. Never apply the cleaning solution directly into the urinal cartridge.
simon institute.org
Page 7
2014
Page 8