Human Rights Alert, NGO

Joseph Zernik, PhD "

123456xyz@gmail.com "n 33407 x"n, 6133301
2014-04-29 Simulated process, fraudulent computer systems of the
Israeli Supreme Court, and proposed corrective actions //
!#$%&'()'* , +'!*,-.&*#/'.#$0+*/+.1& , (2!3#!3*+
(04#&
Corruption of the courts and the legal profession is central cause
of the current socio-economic crisis in srael, immediate corrective
actions must be demanded.
5'*'#%/!6


Boaz Okon (former Magistrate of the Supreme Court, former Director of Administration of
Courts) and Aharon Barak (former Presiding Justice) - central figures in corruption of the
sraeli courts over the past decade, through implementation of fraudulent computer systems.
OccupyTLV, April 29 plenty of evidence emerged in recent years for forgery of
judicial records in the sraeli courts in general, and the Supreme Court in particular,
for the conduct of simulated court process, for the issuance of simulated court
records, following the implementation of fraudulent computer systems in the courts
by the Administration of Courts, starting in 2002.
Conduct of simulated court process is one of the most common method of corruption
in the courts for centuries, and today both in the United States and in srael.
Conduct of simulated process is a form of criminality, which is not covered by any
judicial immunity, since it is extra-judicial conduct.
The conduct of simulated court process should be deemed organized crime of
judges, clerks, and attorneys.
However, following discussions with sraeli attorneys, it appears that there is a need
to clarify the term "Simulated Process, which is not defined by sraeli law. The
common claim by sraeli attorneys is that there is no "simulated process in the sraeli
courts, since there are court records for all such cases.
Simulated court records
Simulated process does not mean that there are no court records, only that the
records are simulated court records.
Therefore, there is a need to distinguish between true, valid and effectual court
records, and simulated court records.
1/7
n the courts of most civilized nations today, the simplest way to distinguish between
lawful legal process, valid and effectual court records, and simulated process,
simulated court records, is through request for certification of the records "True Copy
of the Original by authorized person lawfully appointed Chief Clerk.
The State of srael is also party to the Hague Convention (1961), pertaining to the
certification of official records.
However, repeat requests to have decision records of the sraeli Supreme Court
lawfully certified have failed without exception.
sraeli law does not specifically address the issue of simulated court process and
simulated court records. Therefore, for discussion purposes, reference is made to
the Texas Criminal Code in this matter. Similar laws were enacted in other states in
the United States.
Simulated process, as defined in the 7e8as 9enal Code
Texas Penal Code - Section 32.48. Simulating Legal Process
Legal Research Home > Texas Laws > Penal Code > Texas Penal Code - Section 32.48.
Simulating Legal Process
32.48. SI:;<=7I>? <@?=< 9ABC@SSC
(a) A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to
another any document that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment, or other court
process with the intent to:
(1) induce payment of a claim from another person; or
(2) cause another to:
(A) submit to the putative authority of the document; or
(B) take any action or refrain from taking any action in response to the document,
in compliance with the document, or on the basis of the document.
(b) Proof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it be
forwarded to the intended recipient is a sufficient showing that the document was
delivered.
(c) t is not a defense to prosecution under this section that the simulating document:
(1) states that it is not legal process; or
(2) purports to have been issued or authorized by a person or entity who did not
have lawful authority to issue or authorize the document.
(d) f it is shown on the trial of an offense under this section that the simulating
document was filed with, presented to, or delivered to a clerk of a court or an employee
of a clerk of a court created or established under the constitution or laws of this state,
there is a rebuttable presumption that the document was delivered with the intent
described by Subsection (a).
(e) Except as provided by Subsection (f), an offense under this section is a Class A
misdemeanor.
(f) f it is shown on the trial of an offense under this section that the defendant has
previously been convicted of a violation of this section, the offense is a state jail felony.
Added by Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 189, 3, eff. May 21, 1997.
Comments
aC Issuance of records that state that they are not leDal process
Starting in March 2002, with the death of then Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court
Shmaryahu Cohen and implementation of new computer systems, all records of the
Supreme Court bear the disclaimer: "subject to editing and phrasing changes.
Concomitantly, the certification box, stating "True Copy of the Original, Shmaryahu
Cohen, Chief Clerk, was omitted.
The Administration of Courts refuses to answer on a Freedom of nformation request for
the legal foundation for such outlandish changes in the form of the Supreme Court's
records.
2/7
These changes should be deemed conduct that falls under Section 32.48 of the Texas
Penal Code, quoted above, Article (c) (1), which says:
(c) t is not a defense to prosecution under this section that the simulating
document:
(1) states that it is not legal process;
EC Issuance of court records Ey those Fho are not authoriGed Ey laF
Starting in March 2002 and to this date, there is no lawfully appointed Chief
Clerk in the sraeli Supreme Court.
- On October 15, 2013, a criminal complaint was filed against Presiding Justice
Asher Grunis, pertaining to the false appearance of Sarah Lifschitz as "Chief
Clerk and his response on a request for presenting her appointment record.
- On October 31, 2013 "Chief Clerk Sarah Lifschitz "departed from the
Supreme Court.
- Later, dit Meloul's name started appearing in the web site of the Supreme
Court as "Chief Clerk.
- No record of her appointment was found in the official Register of the State of
srael.
- Presiding Justice Grunis refuses to respond on repeat requests to present the
appointment record of dit Meloul as "Chief Clerk.
- Both Sarah Lifschitz and dit Meloul issued under their signatures purported
records of the Supreme Court.
Such records should be deemed as simulated records of the Supreme Court,
under Section 32.48 of the Texas Penal Code, quoted above, Article (c) (2), which
says:
(c) t is not a defense to prosecution under this section that the simulating
document:
(2) purports to have been issued or authorized by a person or
entity who did not have lawful authority to issue or authorize the
document.
cC Aecidivist criminals
Had section 32.48 of the Texas Penal Code, pertaining to Simulated Legal
Process been in force in the state of srael, all justices of the sraeli Supreme Court
since 2002 should have been considered recidivist criminals, and should have
been jailed.
Corrective actions
Corruption of the judges and the legal profession are central to the socio-economic
crisis in the State of srael today, and such conditions should be immediately
addressed.
The Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the UN Human Rights Council
documented fraud in the computer systems of the Supreme Court, district courts, and
the detainees courts in srael.
The submission was incorporated in the Periodic Report of the UN Human Rights
Council on Human Rights in srael (2013), with the note: "lack of integrity of the
electronic records of the Supreme Court, the district courts and the detainees courts
in srael."
Later, similar fraud was discovered in the computers of the magistrate courts and the
debtors' courts in srael.
The Human Rights Alert submission proposed the following corrective actions:
Aecommendations
Major efforts should be made to address what amounts to a constitutional crisis in a
nation with no constitution:
3/7
1. The electronic records systems of the courts should be examined and repaired by
sraeli computing/legal experts, under accountability to the legislature.
2. A Truth and Reconciliation Commission should be established relative to events
surrounding the 2002 death of Supreme Court Chief Clerk Shmaryahu Cohen and
the role of the judiciary in implementation of the invalid, false and deliberately
misleading electronic record systems in the courts;
3. No court of any nation should be permitted to develop and implement its own
electronic record systems.
____
Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (NGO)
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
OccupyTLV
____
* The Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the Human Rights Council of the
United Nations was incorporated into the 2010 Periodic Review Report regarding
Human Rights in the United States, with the note: "corruption of the courts and the
legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California".
* The Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission to the Human Rights Council of the
United Nations was incorporated into the 2013 Periodic Review Report regarding
Human Rights in srael, with the note: "lack of integrity of the electronic records of the
Supreme Court, the district courts and the detainees courts in srael."
<I>HS
[1] nn ) avoan ( xnnn:n5:annwoxnn5r:a:w " oxnn5raa:o
:xwa ) 2013 )
http://www.scribd.com/doc/114254105/
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8Aa2xQGbmk5NXdwa29SOUViOXc/edit?
usp=sharing
[2] The Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission (2013) for the Universal Periodic
Review of israel by the UN Human Rights Council, as it appears on the UN web site
nn ) :axn ( xnnxavsnxnws5 " o ( :n5:annwoxnn5r:a:w
xnnn " :xwaoxnn5raa:o ) 2013
http://lib.ohchr.org/HRBodies/UPR/Documents/Session15/L/HRA_UPR_SR_S15_2
012_HumanRightsAlert_E.pdf
[3] 13-01-01 The Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission, as incorporated into the
UN Human Rights Council UPR report with the note "Lack of integrity in the
electronic records of the Supreme Court, the district courts and the detainees courts
in srael" (page 4, paragraph 25)
xn:woxnn5rnvnna::5oxnn5r:an " o ) 2013 ( nvnnn:a " n
j:vnuswnnna:wou:xnoan5anw , ornnnuswnnna , rnn:jnna
:xwannwn ) " nv ' 4 , ns 25 ):
http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G12/180/12/PDF/G1218012.pdf?
OpenElement
[4] 12-05-10 Human Right Alert, Appendix to Submission; 15th UPR - State of
srael - "ntegrity, or lack thereof, of the electronic record systems of the courts of the
State of srael"
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8Aa2xQGbmk5cjNxd2szX05oMkU/edit?usp=sharing
[5] 14-01-03 SRAEL: Large-scale Fraud in the Supreme Court's Office of the Clerk
http://www.opednews.com/articles/SRAEL-Large-scale-Fraud-by-Joseph-Zernik-
Corruption_ntegrity_srael_Justice-140103-395.html
[6] 13-10-15 Criminal fraud complaint filed with srael Police against Presiding Justice of the
Supreme Court Asher Grunis // uswnnnaxwa:xwnuwn:nwannxn:vn::sn:n
awxnj:vn
http://www.scribd.com/doc/176398650/
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B8Aa2xQGbmk5Q2tqV1Q5dU40ZWc/edit?usp=sharing
4/7
[7] 14 01 15 SRAEL: Attorney General confirms receipt of criminal Fraud complaint against
Presiding Justice of the Supreme Court Asher Grunis// n:awxn:wnn:uswnnyvn
awxj:vnuswnnnaxwanxn:vn::jn
http://www.scribd.com/doc/203580585/
____
!#$%&'()'* , I+'!*,-.&*#/'.#$0+*/+.1& (2!3#!3*+
(04#&
nannawnar5noaonjnn5vvnouswnnnnw - :5:5
on:xwa , n:x:nranjnw:w .
nnxnnn:nxn " x , 29 :sx: - :wnu:nnan5r:nnxnowaauna5n:nx
j:vnuswnnna , jvnxn:o5:n:n: , uswnnnaajvnxn:jnaan5nsn:
nuswnnwn:vnnxnawnnn5vnnnnnava:xwnn:wj:vn , :nn
a - 2002 .
uswnnnaaownxnnrnnansnnnnwnnuwxnjvnxn:o5:n:n , oa
on , xajn " :xwajna . n::sn:nnnxnjvnxn:o5:n:n , :5an5nnxw
ns:vnn , ynn:nnnnrj5w - nusw ) extra-judicial .( nxrn:nnnanx:w
ousw:wnaxnnvws , j5vn5rnwx .
nnx:nnwsna , j5vovnnw::5 , awnnnxnan:qwwnx " o5:n
jvnxn: ." nnnj5v:wnvun - uswnnnaao5nnwn , o5:nn:xjxj5:
jvnxn: ... jvnxn:jnaan5nsnaosxnjvnxn:o5:no:x .
j5: , ns:vjnaan5jajnan:qw , jvnxn:jnaan5 . a:wuswnnnaa
onnnnnnnxn , s:vjnaan5ns:vo5:njajnan:nanuwsnqn
n , jvnxn:jnaan5o5:nja: , jnaan5wxnwa:vxn " oxnnnvn
n: " ) TRUE COPY OF THE ORGNAL ( js:vn5nn:va:v - wx5rn
ns:vnnn . axnnnx:vnnnnoa:xwnn ) 1961 ( onwoan5wxnvw .
j:vnuswnnnanu:nn:wj5wxn:a:nnxnowaornno:x " nvn
n:oxnn " ::5njnxx:::w5 .
jvnxn:o5:n:wnan:xwnna5nxan5n , j5: , :vjnanq:
u:w::snnanann . nxanwnnaononon " a .
= jvnxn:o5:njv:unnn:wavoan ) j:n:nn =(
u:w::snn - v 32.48 : jvnxn:o5:n
32.48 jvnxn:o5:n
) x ( qnn:wnx:nn:oannrnqnnoxnxoxn::snavvanox
uswnnna:nnrnnnnn , nvanan5 , js , nxjnaan5:5x , :n5a ): 1 ( oa:
nxn:vnw:wo:wn: , x
) 2 ( nx:oa: :
A ( qnnnx:wnx5:n5n:vnwn: ; x
B ( :oxnnaqnn:naananw:5n:vsu:nvnn:xn:vsu: , qnna:vx
nr .
) a ( nxn:nsnn:vxnv:vawn5qnnnw:5ox:qnnn:wnxnnwx
nqnnnw .
) a ( nrvnnnn::snvansnnannxrjx , jvnxn:qnnnox :
) 1 ( najnaqnnxwnx .
) 2 ( nranqnnwx:xsn:nnn5non:jxwnwxox:vwxxsn .
) ( nrvs:vuswnanxxanox , ow:wanjvnxn:qnnnw , anx , nx
uswnnna5rn: , uswnnnan5rnav:x , :wnnnnns:vxnvnw
5/7
nxrnn , nnnq5aw , vannxwn5nqnnnqnnnwn5sn:nnn ) x (
:v: .
) n ( vanxwnna:n ) ,( nrvnnnnav , xn annav Class A
misdemeanor .
) ( nrvs:vuswnanxxanox , nrvs:vnav:vavavwnowxnw ,
anxnnavn state jail felony ) xnwvws .(
= nvn =:
x . naoxwowsnnoan5nsn
yna:nn 2002 , rjn5nnwwxn5rnn:wnnov " nwnawnnn5vnnnn: ,
:xwnn:wj:vnuswnnnaan5:5:vusnnns " nn5vw:s5 ,"
j5:onannnnwwxnnannunwn " n:oxnnnvn , jn5nnwwx5rn ."
ow:nnanaa:vnnwsnn:qs5anwa:vawn:nauswnnnan:nn
n:xoa:sn .
nxnnxnnn:nnnn:xowanx:xnjn vnn ) a ) ( 1 ,( nxn :
" nrvnnnn::snvansnnannxrjx , jvnxn:qnnnox
najnaqnnxwnx ".
a . n:xoan5sn:nao5nnoxwn:vjnaan5nsn
yna:nn 2002 , ns:vnnnwx5rnj:vnuswnnnaajxnrov :
- a - 15 aux: , 2013 , awxj:vnuswnnnaxwan::sn:nnwan , jv:
nnan5nan:nwa:vnawnanxnnwxn5rn5yws:nwnrnnn .
- a - 31 aux: , 2013 " nws " j:vnuswnnnanyws:nw .
- 5::nnv:wnnwj:vnuswnnna:wuuxnnxavsn::nnnnxn " n5rn
nwx ."
- nv:wnnaa::xwnn:wnxnwos:5xnnwaos:5xnx:
5::n " nwxn5rn ."
- :wnnan5nan:nrnnwa:vawn:anawxj:vnuswnnnaxw
5::nnv " nwxn5rn ."
- j:vnuswnnna:w:5a5oan5jnnnnnnnsn::nnvjnyws:nwjn .
jvnxn:jnaan5n:xoan5anx:wq5s: , vs:v ) a ) ( 2 ,( nxn :
" nrvnnnn::snvansnnannxrjx , jvnxn:qnnnox
wx:xsn:nnn5non:jxwnwxox:vwxxsn
nranqnn ".
a . nvnnav
:xwnna5x:nnu:wnnannnnox , usw::5anx:xnjnnn
ynrxn:xwnn:wj:vnuswnnna 2002 ovnoav , xnow .
= onnov =:
nannawnar5noaonjnn5vvnouswnnnnw - on:xwnna:5:5 ,
n:x:nranjnw:w .
" oxnn5r:an ) NGO ( j:vnuswnnnaawnnanxnvn , ornnnuswnnna
) uswnnu ( :xwannwnrnn:jnna .
n " xn:wnsnnna::5n " :xwaoxnn5raa:o ) 2013 ,( nvnnov " : n
j:vnuswnnna:wou:xnoan5anw , ornnnuswnnna , rnn:jnna
:xwannwn ."
nxnnn5w:o:wnuswnnnaawnnanu:anxn:a5n:nx:annnnxn
:vs: .
" oxanonnnovnnxvnoxnn5r:an :
6/7
nnx::nnxannawnjn:wvwxnjno5onxn :
1 . onnn:vnauswnnna:wou:xnoan5nn5vnwxnjn
awnn:o:xw / ouswnx , :xwnn:wnnnnnwn:wnn5nnnn .
2 . snnx:nvjnn:xnjn , wxn5rnn:wnnnxoaanovx:wna
ajn5nnw 2002 , - nvunnwou:xoan5n5vnnannaousw:wo:n
:xwnnauswnnnaa .
3 . oan5nn5vnnxjnn:nns:xnwnnx:5:wuswnnna:vxxnwxnjn
onvon:wou:xn
____
'
nxnnn:nxn , n " x
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
oxnn5r:a ) NGO (
____
* xn:wnsnnna::5oxnn5r:an " :xwaoxnn5raa:o ) 2013 ,( ov
nvnn " : j:vnuswnnna:wou:xnoan5anwn , ornnnuswnnna , na
:xwannwnrnn:jn ."
* xn:wnsnnna::5oxnn5r:an " nxaoxnn5raa:o " a ) 2010 ,( ov
nvnn " : ns:ajnn5vvnuswnnnannnw ."
____
(%+.4
:v:
7/7