Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
A study was conducted to evaluate the effects of aluminum (Al) in nutrient solutions on
the dry weight (DW) yield, Al and phosphorus (P) contents, and organic acid exudation
in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Four alfalfa cultivars (‘Robust’, ‘Sceptre’, ‘Aquarius’,
and ‘California-55’) were grown in nutrient solution at pH 4.5 and 6.0, with (50 and
100 µM) and without Al. The results revealed that Al caused a significant reduction
in DW, especially in pH 4.5 treatment. Organic acid exudation was affected by pH and
Al treatments. Citrate and succinate exudation increased with the high Al treatment at
pH 4.5. However, no relationship between pH and carboxylate exudation was observed
at pH 6.0. Accumulation of P and Al in roots suggests the existence of an exclusion
mechanism for Al in alfalfa. Selection of cultivars with enhanced organic exudation
capacity in response to Al might be useful for alfalfa production in moderately acidic
soils.
Keywords: aluminum, alfalfa, citrate, succinate, dry weight yield, nutrient solution
INTRODUCTION
618
Differential Response to Aluminum in Alfalfa 619
of rhizotoxic Al, although some authors indicate that other monomeric species,
such as AlOH2+ and Al(OH) 2 + , are even more toxic to soybean than Al3+
(Alva et al., 1986).
Plants have evolved two major Al mechanisms: Al tolerance, known as
internal tolerance and Al exclusion from the root apex (Matsumoto, 2000;
Barceló and Poschenrieder, 2002; Kochian et al., 2004; Kochian et al., 2005).
In this category, the exudation of Al-inducible organic acids has been reported
Downloaded By: [Dutch Library Consortium (UKB) - Dekker Titles only] At: 14:26 17 March 2009
renewed every 5d. Three Al levels (0, 50, and 100 µM) added in the form of
aluminum chloride (AlCl 3 ) and two levels of pH (4.5 and 6.0) were tested.
The pH was kept constant by daily addition of 0.1 M hydrochloric acid (HCl)
or sodium hydroxide (NaOH) as required. The experiment was conducted in
a controlled-environment growth chamber for 31 d at 22◦ C with a 50 to 60%
relative humidity and a 16 h light photoperiod.
After 45 d, the plants were harvested, separated into roots and shoots,
oven-dried (60◦ C for 48 h) and weighed. Plant samples were ashed at 500◦ C
for 8 h and then analysed for Al and phosphorus (P) content following
digestion with 2 M HCl. Aluminum was measured by using atomic absorption
Differential Response to Aluminum in Alfalfa 621
Statistics
The experimental design was a randomized complete block with three repli-
Downloaded By: [Dutch Library Consortium (UKB) - Dekker Titles only] At: 14:26 17 March 2009
cations. The results were analyzed by ANOVA and were compared using the
Tukey Test (P ≤ 0.05).
Aluminum reduced the shoot and root DW of alfalfa growing in nutrient so-
lutions, especially at pH 4.5 (Figure 1). The plant roots exposed to higher Al
levels were brown and poorly developed, with the major effect of Al exposure
observed in shoot DW. This clearly indicates that Al affected nutrient uptake,
and reduced the plant growth. However, the magnitude of growth reduction
depended of the alfalfa cultivar. When the plants were exposed to 50 µM Al,
Figure 1. Effects of Al on shoot and root dry weights (g dry weight pot−1 ) in four
alfalfa cultivars in nutrient solutions at two pH levels. Mean of three replicates. Bars in
columns indicates standar error (SE).
622 H. Langer et al.
Table 1
Relative growth reduction (%), related to the control without Al, in plants exposed to
Al in nutrient solutions at pH 4.5 and 6.0
pH 4.5 pH 6.0
California 55 21 52 67 50
Downloaded By: [Dutch Library Consortium (UKB) - Dekker Titles only] At: 14:26 17 March 2009
Robust 55 61 24 29
Sceptre 38 63 17 46
Aquarius 44 55 20 0
the shoot DW was reduced 21 and 55% for California 55 and ‘Robust’, respec-
tively, in relation to the control treatments without Al. At higher Al levels (100
µM) the reduction increased to 52 and 63% for ‘California 55’ and ‘Sceptre’,
respectively. Differential response in shoot DW in absence of Al likely reflects
different yield potentials among alfalfa cultivars (Table 1). Similar variations
in cultivar response to Al have been previously reported in some crop species
(Foy, 1988). The use of alfalfa cultivars that show a high degree of Al tolerance
under nutrient solutions may increase forage production under field conditions.
Although Al3+ is the predominant aqueous species at low pH as shown in
Table 2, other Al monomeric species such AlOH2+ , Al(OH) 2 + , and Al(OH) 4 −
and the polymer Al 13 polymer present at higher pH values have been implicated
in the reduction of plant yields (Kinraide, 1991). It is interesting to mention
that nutrient levels in solution remained adequate to ensure the plant growth,
so they were not strongly affected by the addition of Al to the nutrient solution
(data not shown), which concentrates the possible toxicity of Al-OH forms at
pH 6.0, more than a deficiency in some other nutrient.
Levels of Al and P in the shoots of the alfalfa cultivars growing at different
pH levels are shown in Table 3. Levels of P in shoots were not affected by Al
treatments at both pH levels. However, an increase in Al concentrations in the
shoot tissues for ‘California 55’ and ‘Robust’ was observed. On the other hand,
an increase in root concentration of Al and P was observed in the plants exposed
to Al. Higher levels of Al in roots were achieved by plants growing at pH 4.5
with Al (100 µM), varying from 6.35 to 7.84 g Al kg−1 DW in ‘Aquarius’ and
‘California 55’ cultivars, respectively. Levels of P in roots were from 0.28 to
0.38% in ‘Aquarius’ and ‘Sceptre’ cultivars, respectively.
Our results are in agreement with those reported by Zheng et al. (2005), who
studied the accumulation of Al with P in two cultivars of Fygopyrum esculentum
expressing different degrees of Al tolerance, showing high concentrations of
P and Al in the roots of the tolerant cultivar. These results suggest that the
precipitation of Al with P in root tissues is one mechanism of reducing Al
toxicity. This hypothesis is also supported by the fact that accumulation of P
Differential Response to Aluminum in Alfalfa 623
Table 2
Distribution of Al species in nutrient solutions at different levels of Al and pH as
response to organic acid exudation from alfalfa roots as calculated by GEOCHEM
pH 4.5 pH 6.0
Al treatment (µM) Al treatment (µM)
California 55
+3
Al 17.5 8.8 — —
Al-PO 4 −3 30.4 15.2 0.03 0.02
Al-citrate 43.1 8.5 7.8 19.7
Al-OHa 7.0 66.6 92.23 80.32
Robust
Al+3 13.1 8.8 — —
Al-PO 4 −3 23.8 15.2 0.03 0.02
Al-citrate 58.3 4.3 16.4 1.63
Al-OHa 3.2 70.8 83.53 98.32
Sceptre
Al+3 17.5 8.8 — —
Al-PO 4 −3 30.3 15.2 0.03 0.02
Al-citrate 22.1 20.4 18.9 11.8
AlOHa 28.0 54.7 81.03 88.22
Aquarius
Al+3 17.5 8.8 — —
Al-PO 4 −3 30.3 15.2 0.03 0.02
Al-citrate 24.5 9.4 19.9 11.0
Al-OHa 25.5 65.7 80.13 89.02
a
Al complexed in solution and precipitated.
Table 3
Effects of pH and aluminum on the phosphorus (%) and aluminum (g kg−1 ) contents
in shoots and roots in four alfalfa cultivars in nutrient solutions
pH 4.5 pH 6.0
Al P) Al P Al P Al P Al
(µM) (%) (g kg−1 ) (%) (g kg−1 ) (%) (g kg−1 ) (%) (g kg−1 )
California 55
0 0.14 abA 0.05 abA 0.23 0.23 0.13 abA 0.03 cdB 0.29 0.08
50 0.15 abA 0.09 aA 0.32 6.08 0.13 abA 0.06 abB 0.36 3.70
100 0.14 abA 0.10 aA 0.32 7.84 0.14 abA 0.07 aB 0.30 3.04
Robust
0 0.17 abA 0.03 cA 0.29 0.30 0.16 abA 0.02 dA 0.35 0.04
50 0.15 abA 0.03 cA 0.31 6.83 0.16 abA 0.06 abcA 0.40 3.66
100 0.18 aA 0.05 abA 0.30 7.03 0.15 abA 0.07 aA 0.35 3.10
Sceptre
0 0.13 abA 0.04 abA 0.27 0.27 0.11 abA 0.03 dA 0.27 0.02
50 0.17 abA 0.05 abA 0.32 7.08 0.17 aA 0.03 cdB 0.31 2.48
100 0.15 abA 0.09 aA 0.38 7.20 0.15 abA 0.03 cdB 0.29 2.21
Aquarius
0 0.12 bA 0.04 abA 0.23 0.28 0.10 bA 0.02 dA 0.32 0.05
50 0.14 abA 0.06 bA 0.26 5.46 0.13 abA 0.03 dB 0.34 2.96
100 0.14 abA 0.06 bA 0.28 6.35 0.13 abA 0.04 bcdA 0.27 2.32
Within columns, means followed by the same lower case letter were not significantly
different (P ≤ 0.05) according to ANOVA and Tukey’s test. Mean values within rows
for each variable with the same upper case letter were not significantly different
(P ≤ 0.05) according to Student’s t-test. Values of Al and P in shoots are means of
three replicates, except for a single value in roots.
Figure 2. Effect of Al on the exudation of citrate (µmol h−1 g−1 root dry weight) in four
alfalfa cultivars under nutrient solutions at pH 4.5. Mean of three replicates. Columns
followed by different letters indicate significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) according to
Tukey test. Bars in columns indicates standar error (SE).
Figure 3. Effect of Al on the exudation of succinate (µmol h−1 g−1 root dry weight)
in four alfalfa cultivars under nutrient solutions at pH 4.5. Mean of three replicates.
Columns followed by different letters indicate significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) ac-
cording to Tukey test. Bars in columns indicates standar error (SE).
626 H. Langer et al.
Both the quality and the quantity of the organic acid exuded by plant roots
are critical to reducing Al toxicity. Some estimations suggest that an equimolar
concentration of citrate is required to avoid the root elongation in maize, which
is considered a useful criteria for estimating Al toxicity (Zheng et al., 1998).
This means that the concentration of citrate required in the nutrient solution in
order to overcome Al toxicity might in the range of 50 or 100 µM.
Aqueous chemical speciation of Al is largely dependent on pH. Estimates
Downloaded By: [Dutch Library Consortium (UKB) - Dekker Titles only] At: 14:26 17 March 2009
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
REFERENCES