Aversive Pavlovian Conditioning in Childhood Anxiety Disorders: Impaired Response
Inhibition and Resistance to Extinction Anxiety is one of the most common psychological conditions throughout the world, yet even with so many people suffering from this disorder very little is known about the cognitive developments involved in causing such internal worry. In this article, the author examines the underlying processes of anxiety disorders, especially in the early onset of this disorders in children. Based on previous studies done on both adults and children, Walters observed children classified as anxious as they underwent conditioning and compared them to control group of children ranging in age from 8 to 12. The 35 subjects were presented with a pastel pink trapezoid accompanied by a harsh loud noise and a pastel cream triangle that was presented without a tone. Their responses to the two were monitored through skin conductance conditioned responses as well as self-reporting from the kids. The article reiterated some of the material describing classic conditioning that was covered in the textbook. Walters described the ideas of unconditioned and conditioned stimuli, as well as discriminative conditioning. In this case, the unconditioned stimuli was the loud noise and the conditioned stimulus was the pastel pink trapezoid. Concurrently, the discriminate stimulus was the pastel cream triangle. While the explanations of the unconditioned and conditioned stimuli were very much repetitions of the text, Walters goes into much more detail about discriminative conditioning. In her study, discriminative conditioning is essential in identifying whether or not the anxious children are learning the difference between the dangerous trapezoid and the safe triangle. In fact, the study decidedly concludes that the anxious children have an inhibited ability to discriminate between the dangerous and the safe. This problem arises in the acquisition of the discriminative response. All of the children in the study were able to acquire the initial conditioned response, the anxious children responding with higher frequencies to the conditioned response. However, the larger and seemingly more impactful difference occurs when the children are being conditioned to discriminate. The anxious children continue to respond to the discriminative stimulus for a longer period of time than the other children. This insinuates that anxiety disorders are in part due to a weakened response inhibition to this stimulus. This concept of weakening and varied responses to discriminative stimuli expands the possibilities for understanding other psychological disorder. The textbook describes the concept of extinction as a natural part of the conditioning process, in which when the conditioned stimulus is no longer presented with the unconditioned stimulus, the conditioned response reduces over time. Still, the article has a differing interpretation, that rather, extinction reflects that the CS has essentially two meaningsone that is associated with the US and one that is not. This implies that the period known as extinction is not an impairment of the conditioned response but a second form of conditioning to the same stimulus, yet, this time the conditioned response is a lack of response. The article goes in more depth and provides insight into the effects of a lack of extinction as a part of conditioning. The children with anxiety exhibit a need for a longer time period for the response to become extinct. This, in turn, effect the phenomena learned in class called spontaneous recovery. The group of anxious children have a heighted response to the conditioned stimulus as compared to the control group given the same amount of time. Thus, the anxious children have a natural opposition to extinction. These results support many of the hypothesis surrounding neurological disorders. They have numerous implications for further research, understanding, and treatment of anxiety disorders in that they provide insight into the cognitive processes behind anxiety.