Notre Dame/Army: Defending the

Triple Option
By burger23 @burger23OFD 20
Stay connected for news and updates
<img alt="" size_name="large_730"
src="http://cdn1.sbnation.com/entry_photo_images/1724041/GYI0062552344.jpg" />
Hey look! Defense against an option team! (Photo by Nick Laham/Getty Images)

Let me begin by saying its awesome that Notre Dame was able to hold an Army team that
finished the season tenth in the NCAA with 256 yards rushing per game to only 174 total yards
of offense and only 135 yards rushing. Ive been accused of being a pessimist at times, but there
are a few things Irish fans need to keep in mind before anointing Bob Diaco "Slayer of the Triple
Option" and declaring next seasons games against the service academies as automatic wins.
First, Army and Navy do not run the same offense. Yes, they are both option-oriented, but Army
does not run the flexbone, which leads to different challenges for the defense (more on that in a
bit). Second, Navy has been running their offense since Paul Johnson took over as head coach in
2002. When he left for Georgia Tech, his offense coordinator, Ken Niumatalolo, took over to
provide continuity for the program. Meanwhile, at Army, 2010 was only the second season the
team had been running Rich Ellersons option scheme. The option isnt as ingrained in the
program at Army as it is at Navy. Finally, Army straight up isnt as good as Navy. Theyre
definitely better than they were two years ago before Ellerson was hired, but they arent on the
same level as Navy yet.
All that being said, there are definitely some positives to take away from this game. Some
critical defensive adjustments were made that give me hope for the Navy game next season. But
lets start by talking about the Army offense and how it differs from Navys.
The Army offense is probably best described as the Wing-T.

via wikipedia.org
This is the T-formation, one of the oldest formations in football that first gave rise to option
football. In their version, Army flexes one of the halfbacks out and sometimes (but not all the
time) motions him into the backfield, creating a T-like formation.

Like Navy, Armys offense heavily features the Veer, and the mechanics of the play are exactly
the same. Army, however, can only show three receivers at a time, while Navy can show four,
which puts more stress on the other teams pass defense. However, Army can incorporate more
misdirection and more traditional straight-ahead running , which Navy cant do out of the
flexbone. But just like Navy, if the Veer is rolling, this offense is hard to stop.
Now lets look at how Notre Dame fared on defense.

The Irish line up with four down linemen: Ethan Johnson slides inside and Darius Fleming lines
up next to him. Manti Teo lines up with Brian Smith at linebacker. Playing where the outside
linebackers normally would be are Robert Blanton and Jamoris Slaughter. Harrison Smith is
playing a single high safety about ten yards off the line.
The first drive worried me. Despite the new look, the defense was repeating the mistakes from
the Navy game. Lets look at how ND defended the Veer.

One thing that was different was the defensive ends finally crashing hard on the fullback
dive. Fleming even shoves the tackle as he releases, preventing him from getting up to the
second level. But look at the middle linebackers. Theyre still attacking inside. This is literally
the same defense Notre Dame showed against Navy, but with defensive backs playing outside
linebacker and one more man on the line.

Like before, Blanton steps in the quarterbacks way to force the pitch, and, like before, the
middle linebackers are already out of the play. Harrison Smith has to get down the line to stop
the pitch man, but hes nine yards off the line and just entering his break when the pitch is made.

Again, theres no one playing contain, and the running back is off to the races until someone
shoves him out of bounds.
Ok, that was pretty bad. Notre Dame avoided going down 7-0 when Army quarterback, Trent
Steelman*, missed a wide open man in the end zone on 3
rd
and goal.
I would bet most ND fans were having some pretty terrible flashbacks after that first Army
drive. But fear not: defensive adjustments were (finally) made.

Heres ND lined up the same way as before. Army is going to run the Veer to the wing backs
side. Hes going to be used as a blocker with no pre-snap motion.

Once again, Fleming shoves the tackle as he goes by and crashes to take away the dive. Two
things are important to note here. The first is Robert Blanton, who is no longer coming down to
cut off the quarterback. Instead, hes following the wing back to occupy him as a blocker. The
next is the middle linebackers. Theyre actually staying back and not running inside right into
blockers.

In fact, its Teo who comes down to force the pitch. Steelman makes a bad read and decides to
keep it himself for some reason. But you can see that Brian and Harrison Smith were there to
take the pitch if he had made it.
How about another look?

The Irish and Knights are lined up the same way as before. This time, Army will motion the
wing back and use him as the pitch man on the Veer.

Fleming takes care of the dive and Slaughter takes the quarterback. Brian Smith comes down
(attacking the B-gap! Not the A-gap! /sheds tear). Look at Harrison Smith. Hes already
running full speed towards the play, unlike in the first drive where he was still standing and
watching at this time.

Steelman makes the pitch. Harrison Smith and Teo are flowing in the direction of the
play. Slaughter and Brian Smith try to adjust to run down the pitch man.

Harrison Smith gets there first and brings him down for a loss. Teo and Slaughter probably
could have gotten to him also, but wouldnt have been able to drop him behind the line.
Unlike in the Navy game, Diaco actually mixed up the defense a little bit against the Black
Knights. The Irish showed a 4-3 look a few times.

The defensive tackles are lined up right over the center and the ends are outside the offensive
tackles. Teo is the middle, about five yards back. Brian Smith and Blanton flank him.

Again, Army motions the wing back on the Veer. The idea for the Irish is to bait the fullback
dive and funnel him right into Teo and Smith. The tackles collapse on the center and playside
guard and somehow manage to take out the backside guard, too. Kapron Lewis-Moore plays the
QB instead of the FB, and Steelman hands it off.

KLMs move was more of a squat, and is in position to tackle the fullback as he goes by. At the
same time, the playside guard isnt able to get to Teo in time to block him, and the Knights only
gain three yards.
The Irish didnt use this look a whole lot; it almost concedes about three yards on the Veer and
was seen mostly in long yardage situations (or when up three touchdowns).
Irish fans should feel good about the defenses performance in this game. The first drive
probably led to a lot of hand-wringing after the Knights racked up 78 yards with relative
ease. But the Irish responded and only allowed 96 more yards the rest of the game. Overall,
Diaco made some good adjustments on the Veer, adjustments that were sorely lacking in the
Navy game.
I think the biggest adjustment might be the use of a four man front against Army. In the Navy
game, the Irish showed a five man front with the outside linebackers playing on the line. I
understand Diacos reasoning. The idea was to keep forcing the play outside and then wait for
the middle linebackers or safeties to get over and clean it up. However, the MLBs failed to flow
and the safeties couldnt get down fast enough. Plus, with only two linebackers in the middle, it
left the Irish exposed to getting gashed by the fullback if they got blocked. With the four man
front (and with the end actually crashing hard to take away the dive), the linebackers and safety
could react to the play easier. You can see that in the plays outlined above. Brian Smith and
Teo actually plug up holes, come down on the quarterback, and make plays instead of running
into blockers. Harrison Smith plays centerfield and attacks the ball aggressively. All of these
things were missing against the Midshipmen and its good to see the defense actually able to stop
the triple option.
But it might be best to temper expectations for next season. Will these changes work against
Navy? Honestly, probably not. For one thing, the Navy coaching staff has seen what we did
against Army and will definitely have a response ready. Scheme-wise, Im not crazy about
playing with only one safety back against the flexbone. I would prefer to use only three
linebackers and put another safety back with Harrison Smith. The defense needs to be able to
account for both receivers and both wing backs in the passing game against the flexbone. Army
typically only showed two receivers and one wing back, meaning only one safety was
adequate. Finally, a big part of the defenses success might have been jumping out to an early
lead. Navy never had to deviate from their base offense, but Army was forced to play catch-up
early on, something an option team doesnt like to do. But the very fact adjustments were
actually made this time is a positive sign and should let Irish fans sleep a little easier in the week
leading up to the Navy game in a few months.
*Trent Steelman is a name that cant possibly be real. It sounds like the name of a comic book
hero who was just a working class joe until an industrial accident gave him superpowers who
then vowed to use his abilities to fight the evils of communism and poor hygiene in our nations
youth. At least he lived up to his name by joining the Army and becoming a true American hero.