Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
1
r
2
ext
(1)
where Q is the volumetric ow rate and r is the air density.
The total grasping force F
g
can be evaluated through the
following expression:
F
g
F
l
F
r
with
F
l
1
2
r
Q
2
2ph
2
ln
r
ext
r
int
1
2
r
2
ext
r
2
int
r
2
ext
! " #
; F
r
r
Q
2
pr
2
int
(2)
where F
l
is the lifting force obtained by integrating the expression
(1) all over the plate and F
r
is the repulsion force generated by the
collision of the air jet to the object surface.
Considering constant the ow rate, the grasping force depends
on the value of the gap h. As demonstrated by the expression (2),
the grasping force increases by reducing the distance between the
gripper and the object. In the reality, if the gap is reduced further,
the grasping force does not hyperbolically increase but, mainly due
to the compressibility of air and therefore to the reduction of the
ow rate, the force reaches a maximum value and then gradually
decreases.
2.2. Proposals of Bernoulli grippers for grasping leather plies
Different variants of Bernoulli grippers have been proposed and
tested in this research (Table 1). The design rationale was to
increase the radial owversus the vertical owin order to decrease
F
r
. For this reason, a deector has been introduced (with 2 different
angles: a = 608, a = 308) even if its presence obviously reduces the
working area of the Bernoulli effect and therefore the lifting force
(increasing of r
int
).
The innovation of these proposals concerns the presence of 16
radial grooves in the grippers G3.1 and G3.2. As illustrated in Fig. 2,
each groove has been shaped as a Venturi channel with 3 different
sectors: a convergent sector, a constant sector and a divergent
sector. The expected result of this proposal should be a further
Fig. 2. Bernoulli grippers with the deector. The details show the front and lateral
views of a Venturi channel adopted in G3.1 and G3.2.
Fig. 1. Bernoulli gripper.
Table 1
Gripper congurations used in the experiments.
Gripper
Internal radius r
int
4 mm 16 mm 16 mm 16 mm 16 mm
External radius r
ext
45 mm 45 mm 45 mm 45 mm 45 mm
Deector angle a Without deector 608 308 608 308
Plate surface Flat Flat Flat Grooved Grooved
G. Dini et al. / CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 58 (2009) 2124 22
contribution to the lifting action exerted by the gripper, exploiting
the vacuum created in the central part of each Venturi channel.
3. Experiments
The aim of the experiments is to compare the performance of
each proposed gripper by measuring the grasping force F
g
for
different leather plies, varying the gap and keeping constant the
volumetric ow rate Q at the value of 4.8 10
3
m
3
/s.
3.1. Experimental plan and facilities
Table 2 shows the main characteristics of the leathers used
in these experiments. Two sides for each leather have been
considered for grasping:
external side, which represents the external skin of the animal
and characterized by a smooth and delicate surface, very
appreciated in leather goods;
internal side, which represents the internal skin of the animal
(also named esh side) and characterized by a rough and very
irregular surface (see pictures in Table 2).
The same tests have been also repeated for a rigid and non-porous
specimen made of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) with a thickness
of 10 mm.
The main components of the experimental apparatus are:
a 4-axis SCARA robot, used to vertically move the gripper;
a dynamometer, placed on the workbench and used to measure
the grasping force along the movement of the gripper (resolu-
tion: 0.25 N; working range: 330 N; acquisition rate: 25 Hz).
Each specimen has been positioned on the dynamometer
through a rigid support of 200 mm 200 mm, glued by small drops
distributed on a grid having a step of 20 mm. This solution allows to
maintain the leather in contact with the rigid substrate, but it does
not signicantly alter the porosity and the elasticity of the leather.
A step-by-step movement of the gripper, with a delay time
between each step of 1 s, has been adopted in order to correlate the
force measurement with the distance between the gripper plate
and the specimen surface. Such procedure has been designed to
study the gripper performance in quasi-static conditions; at the
current stage of the research, the variation of the force in dynamic
conditions has not been investigated yet.
3.2. Results
An example of results is reported in Fig. 3. The experiment has
been performed by moving the gripper rstly upward (receding
gripper) and then downward (advancing gripper) from the contact
point with the leather. The grasping force measured by the
dynamometer is not constant within each step. Besides the
expected uctuations, mainly due to the turbulent air ow,
another interesting behaviour can be noticed. The leather ply,
under the effect of a force, shows a non-linear behaviour within
each step: the ply seems to act as a spring-damper couple. During
the receding motion, at the beginning of each step, the force
increases and the leather is stretched out; during the delay time
the leather relaxes, and the force tends to decrease. Conversely,
when the gripper approaches the leather, the force decreases, the
Table 2
Leather specimens and their characteristics.
Leather specimen L1i: cattle skin (internal side) L1e: cattle skin (external side) L2i: goat skin (internal side) L2e: goat skin (external side)
Front view
Lateral view
Surface quality Rough Smooth Rough Smooth
Thickness 3.5 mm 1.0 mm
Density 24.0 g/dm
2
2.4 g/dm
2
Fig. 3. Example of a result obtained during tests. Fig. 5. Grasping force on a PMMA plate (Q = 4.8 10
3
m
3
/s).
Fig. 4. Example of a forcegap curve obtained during tests.
G. Dini et al. / CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 58 (2009) 2124 23
leather reduces its stretch, the gap increases and therefore the
grasping force tends to rise.
For clarity, in all the following graphs, the noise of the signal has
been ltered, the non-linear behaviour has been removed and the
force F
g
has been correlated to the gap distance h. A typical curve is
illustrated in Fig. 4. This curve is very useful to determine the
gripper performance with respect to the weight of the object to be
grasped. For instance, if a weight mg = 17 N is considered, the
following zones can be observed:
a feasible grasping zone, with the gap h ranging between 0 and
2 mm;
unfeasible grasping zone, where the force is not sufcient to
grasp the leather ply (h > 2 mm).
The zone of feasible grasping can be divided in three sectors: (1)
the negative part of the curve, where the gripper is very close to the
leather and F
r
overcomes the lifting effect; (2) the sector of stable
positions of the grasped object; (3) an unstable sector, where the
object, when grasped, is accelerated toward the plate of the gripper.
In Fig. 4, the line of the object weight intersects the curve in 2
equilibrium points P
1
and P
2
.
P
1
is a stable point: when the leather is in P
1
and the gap
increases, the force increases as well and the object is attracted
towards the plate. The opposite happens when the leather is still in
P
1
but the gap decreases. In this case the grasping force is reduced
and the object moves away from the plate coming back towards
the equilibrium point.
P
2
is not a stable point: if the gap is just below 2 mm, the object
accelerates towards the plate andthe gapis reduceduntil it arrives to
P
1
, where it tends to remain; if the gap is just over 2 mm, the force is
lower than the object weight and the grasping is not accomplished.
As a reference for the following tests, the grasping force exerted
by each gripper has been measured using a 200 mm 200 mm
specimen of PMMA. It is clearly evident from Fig. 5 that, in this
case, the gripper without the deector (G1) gives the best
performance. The grippers with a = 608 (G2.1 and G3.1) show a
very low value of the grasping force. Conversely, the two grippers
with a = 308 show an appreciable lifting force, higher in G3.2
having the Venturi channels.
Fig. 6 synthesizes the results obtained in grasping the different
leather specimens. It is possible to observe that:
the performance of G1 decreases drastically when it acts on
leathers, instead of PMMA, probably due to their porosity, and
becomes comparable with G2.2 and G3.2;
G2.1 and G3.1 continue to present a low value of the grasping
force due to the simultaneous effect of a reduced grasping area
and to a greater vertical component of the air jet (a = 608);
G3.2 shows a very good behaviour in all situations demonstrat-
ing, in grasping these kinds of materials, the positive effect of a
small deector angle and the presence of the Venturi channels. In
particular, a payload of at least 10 N can be assured in each
situation.
No imprint on the leather surfaces has been noticed during the
tests performed by the grippers equipped with the deector. On
the contrary, G1, which generates a jet perpendicular to the leather
surface, produces appreciable imprints in a small area approached
by the gripper nozzle.
4. Conclusions and proposal of application
These experiments show that the tested leather plies can be
grasped by Bernoulli grippers. In particular, the use of a deector
having a small angle aand radial Venturi channels on the plate give
positive effects to the grasping force and completely eliminates
imprints on the leather surface.
A set of Bernoulli grippers can be applied for handling large
leather plies, having a weight usually ranging between 5 and 50 N,
by grasping them on the central area of the leather surface. As said
before, in this kind of application the borders fall down and it
becomes difcult or impossible to release it on the conveyor belt of
a processing machine. For this reason, a rotating device able to
spread the leather through two perpendicular directions has been
designed and it is currently under testing.
Future works will be oriented to optimize the gripper
geometry, by means of FEM simulations, in order to increase
the grasping force. Further researches will be also devoted to
investigate the transversal stability of grasping, an important
issue in the case of grasping parts with contactless grippers, and
the dynamic conditions of handling, fundamental in industrial
practice.
References
[1] Failli F, Dini G (2004) An Innovative Approach to the Automated Stacking and
Grasping of Leather Plies. CIRP Annals 53(1):3134.
[2] Lien TK, Davis PGG (2008) A Novel Gripper for Limp Materials Based on Lateral
Coanda Ejectors. CIRP Annals 57(1):3336.
[3] Monkman GJ, Hesse S, Steinmann R, Schunk H (2007) Robot Grippers. Wiley-
VCH.
[4] Schmalz K (1994) Vacuum Grippers on Robots and Handling Systems. Proced-
ings of the 25th International Symposium on Industrial Robots, 5965.
[5] Ozcelik B, Erzincanli F, Findik F (2003) Evaluation of Handling Results of Various
Materials using a Non-contact End-effector. Industrial Robot 30(4):363369.
[6] Ozcelik B, Erzincanli F (2005) Examination of the Movement of a Woven Fabric
in the Horizontal Direction using a Non-contact End-effector. International
Journal of Manufacturing Technology 25:527532.
[7] Davis S, Gray JO, Caldwell DG (2006) An End-effector Based on the Bernoulli
Principle for Handling Sliced Fruit and Vegetables. Robotics and Computer
Integrated Manufacturing . 10.1016/j.rcim.2006.11.002.
Fig. 6. Grasping force exerted by the grippers for different leather specimens (Q = 4.8 10
3
m
3
/s).
G. Dini et al. / CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 58 (2009) 2124 24