ov !"# $%!& and it' attachment' (o prove it' exi'tence# )enuinene'' and due execution and a' part of the te'timony of Private Complainant. (o prove all alle)ation' of the complainant in thi' crimanl complaint a)ain't defendant. A*! Pa)e $ of the affidavit A*$ Pa)e & A*& Pa)e + A*+ Pa)e , A*, Pa)e - A*- Pa)e . A*-*a /i)nature of Lennie Joy A. Alviola Exhibit 0 An'1er to Letter*Complaint (o prove the fact that defendant had 1ritten 1ord' a)ain't the complainant 1hich i' 'ub2ect to thi' criminal ca'e. 0*! Par $ of the An'1er3 /he i' the victim of a con'piracy and frame up bet1een her cunnin) immediate 'upervi'ory authority# 'ome 2ealou' co*employee' the 'chemin) dau)hter of incumbent mayor 1ho 1ant' to be the mayor and a certain 4r'. 5a''elman 0*$ /i)nature of ila 6. Arado Exhibit C 4inute' of the Preliminary 7nve'ti)ation conducted on the complaint a)ain't 4'. ila Arado for i''uin) fa8e 4ayor9' Permit C*! /i)nature of 6ivien 4iraflor*/ecretary C*$ /i)nature of :odard ;abri'tante* Chairman C*& /i)nature of Ce'ar 0lanco# Jr *4ember C*+ /i)nature of A)u'tin <amacho* member C*, /i)nature of 4arfelia /arte *4ember Exhibit = >indin)' and <ecommendation' of the 7nve'ti)atin) Committee. (o prove the fact that =efendant Arado for)ed the 'i)nature of the 4unicipal 6ice 4ayor in i''uin) the 4ayor' Permit. Exhibit E Letter from =enmar Abo addre''ed to 4ayor Alviola dated July !,# $%!& (o prove that a complaint 1a' filed a)ain't ila Arado for i''uin) a fa8e mayor9' permit. Exhibit > Affidavit of Carmecil albino dated July !-# $%!& (o prove that ila Arado i''ued a 4ayor9' Permit to 4ad =o) <e'to 0ar and <e'ort. Exhibit >*! /i)nature of Carmecil Albino in her Affidavit dated July !-# $%!& Exhibit : 4ayor9' Permit i''ued on June $,# $%!& :*! /econd Pa)e of the 4ayor' Permit >*!*a >or)ed 'i)nature of 6ice 4ayor (uballa Exhibit 5 Letter of 6ice 4ayor (uballo addre''ed to the 4ayor dated ???????? Exhibit 7 Judicial Affidavit of Elenita (. 6alencia dated =ec !%# $%!& (o 'upport certain alle)ation' of Private Complainant in hi' complaint a)ain't the defendant >oundation@Preliminary@E'tab motive 7*! Pa)e $ 7*!*a /i)nature of Elenita (. 6alencia Exhibit J Judicial Affidavit dated =ec !%# $%!& of 4erlie A. Abante (o 'upport certain alle)ation' of Private Complainant in hi' complaint a)ain't the defendant J*! Pa)e $ J*!*a /i)nature of 4erlie A. Abante Exhibit ; Judicial Affidavit dated =ec !%# $%!& of <evah An)u'tia 6. 6enale' (o 'upport certain alle)ation' of Private Complainant in hi' complaint a)ain't the defendant Pa)e $ /i)nature of <evah An)u'tia 6. 6enale' Exhibit L Judicial Affidavit dated =ec !%# $%!& of Ed1in 7noferio (o 'upport certain alle)ation' of Private Complainant in hi' complaint a)ain't the defendant L*! Pa)e $ L*!*a /i)nature of Ed1in 7noferio Exhibit 4 Judicial Affidavit dated =ec !%# $%!& of <o1ena 4orado' (o 'upport certain alle)ation' of Private Complainant in hi' complaint a)ain't the defendant. 4*! Pa)e $ 4*!*a /i)nature of <o1ena 4orado' <e'ervation of additional exhibit' in the cour'e of the proceedin) of thi' ca'e. ot made 1ith )ood motive' and for 2u'tifiable end' G.R. No. L-16772 November 30, 1962 THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, plaintiff*appellant# v'. JULIN !ONTON, E AEvery defamatory imputation i' pre'umed to be maliciou' even if it be true# if no )ood intention and 2u'tifiable motive for ma8in) it i' 'ho1n# except in the follo1in) ca'e'3 (!) a private communication made by any per'on to another in the performance of any le)al# moral# or 'ocial duty.A Libel# a' defined under Article &,&# ha' three element'3 (he imputation mu't be defamatory# it mu't have been )iven publicity# and it mu't be maliciou'. A fourth element may al'o be con'idered implicit in the provi'ion# namely# that the victim of the libel mu't be identifiable. (he defamatory character of the imputation i' 'ho1n by the recital' thereof. o evidence aliunde need be adduced to prove it. Bith re'pect to the element of malice# the 'ame i' e'tabli'hed (either by pre'umption or by proof. 7f nothin) but the defamatory imputation it'elf i' laid before the court# malice i' pre'umed from it# and to overcome thi' pre'umption there mu't be a 'ho1in) of )ood intention and 2u'tifiable motive. 7n other 1ord'# the burden i' upon the defendant' to overcome the le)al inference of malice.