Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
R
sstop
sstart
c
w
m
w
T
hw;in
T
hw;out
ds
R
sstop
sstart
IA
sc
ds
1
Key indexes, such as cooling capacity Q
d
, thermal coef-
cient of performance COP
d,t
(i.e. COP based on thermal
energy usage), electric coecient of performance COP
d,e
(i.e. COP based on electrical energy input) and moisture
removal Dd are used to evaluate the performance of the
TSDC unit:
Q
d
m
d;a
h
1
h
5
2
COP
d;t
Q
d
Q
reg
Q
d
c
w
m
w
T
hw;in
T
hw;out
3
COP
d;e
Q
d
W
d
Q
d
W
hw;pump
W
cw;pump
W
motor
4
Dd Dd
1
Dd
2
d
1
d
2
d
3
d
4
5
To nd out the combined thermal and electric perfor-
mance of the TSDC unit, COP based on weighted primary
energy consumption, which takes 1 kW of electrical energy
to be equivalent to 3.33 kW of thermal energy (Sheridan
and Mitchell, 1985), is also studied:
COP
d;p
Q
d
Q
p;d
Q
d
Q
reg
3:33W
d
6
Besides, electric power saving rate E
save,d
and primary
energy saving rate P
save,d
, which represent the potential
of electric power saving and primary energy saving for pro-
ducing 1 kW cooling power, respectively, are evaluated
based on the dierence between the TSDC unit and the
VAC unit:
E
save;d
W
v
=Q
v
W
d
=Q
d
W
v
=Q
v
7
P
save;d
Q
p;v
=Q
v
Q
p;d
=Q
d
Q
p;v
=Q
v
8
Also, cooling capacity Q
v
, electric coecient of perfor-
mance COP
v,e
and COP based on primary energy COP
v,p
are used to evaluated the performance of the VAC unit:
Q
v
m
v;a
h
R
h
6
9
COP
v;e
Q
v
W
v
Q
v
UI
ave
10
COP
v;p
Q
v
3:33W
v
11
Additionally, cooling capacity Q
c
and solar fraction f
solar
of the hybrid solar air conditioning system are calculated
by:
Q
c
Q
d
Q
v
12
f
solar
Q
d
Q
c
13
Fig. 3. Psychrometric representation of the solar hybrid desiccant air
conditioning system.
D. La et al. / Solar Energy 85 (2011) 29973009 3001
The thermodynamic performance of the hybrid system
has also been evaluated based on two dierent criteria,
namely, COP based on electrical energy intake COP
e
and
COP based on primary energy usage COP
p
:
COP
e
Q
c
W
d
W
v
14
COP
p
Q
c
Q
p
Q
c
Q
reg
3:33W
d
W
v
15
Corresponding electric power saving rate E
save
and pri-
mary energy saving rate P
save
are obtained by:
E
save
W
v
=Q
v
W
c
=Q
c
W
v
=Q
v
16
P
save
Q
p;v
=Q
v
Q
p
=Q
c
Q
p;v
=Q
v
17
4. Experimental results
The hybrid air conditioning system has been operated
since November 2007 and after numerous experimental
runs throughout the winter of 2007 and the spring of
2008, its operation was monitored from 6 July to 17 Sep-
tember during the summer of 2008.
For the purpose of presenting the performance of the
system, data recorded on 22 July, of which the ambient
air possessed an average temperature of 34.6 C and
humidity ratio of 21.54 g/kg, closely to the local outdoor
design condition (34 C, 21.87 g/kg) and the typical condi-
tion, under which Ge et al. (2009) carried out correspond-
ing experiments in lab (35 C, 23.2 g/kg), were selected and
discussed in this section. It can be expected that, the frac-
tion of the air r
a,d
(i.e. ratio of the air ow rate of the TSDC
unit to that of the hybrid system including the air processed
by the VAC unit) has signicant inuence on the supply air
state and the system performance. However, the optimal
air fraction depends on ambient and indoor conditions
greatly and varies with time and weather. In practical
application, it can be achieved through control strategy
optimization (Vitte et al., 2008). Here, since what we want
to present is the potential and the feasibility of the pro-
posed solar hybrid desiccant air conditioning system, the
air fraction has been set as two typical values, which stand
for the situation with qualied supply air and unqualied
supply air, respectively. Besides, as the VAC unit has been
investigated extensively, we have focused on introducing
the solar driven TSDC unit. Specically, the ow rate of
the air processed by the TSDC unit V
a,d
was adjusted from
2600 m
3
/h (r
a,d
= 34%) to 1800 m
3
/h (r
a,d
= 26%). Other
operating parameters were kept constant to maintain the
reliability and simplify the operation, as listed in Table 2.
4.1. Solar collector arrays
Fig. 4 shows the variations of inlet and outlet hot water
temperatures of the TSDC unit, solar radiant intensity and
ambient temperature. Here, the solar radiation data is the
inclined solar radiation that eectively hits the collector.
It is referred to the angle in which the solar collector has
been arranged. As can be seen, while the solar radiant
intensity uctuates between 122.2 W/m
2
and 539.9 W/m
2
,
the temperature of inlet hot water varies with in the range
of 62.166.9 C. The average temperature dierences
between inlet and outlet hot waters before and after
14:22 are about 11 C and 9 C, respectively. Based on
Eq. (1), the average eciency of the solar heating subsys-
tem over the monitoring period is found to be 0.32.
4.2. Performance analysis
In Fig. 5, the supply air conditions and corresponding
ambient conditions are plotted in a psychrometric chart.
It turns out that the solar air conditioning system can pro-
vide qualied supply air when V
a,d
is 1800 m
3
/h. However,
when V
a,d
reaches 2600 m
3
/h, the humidity ratio of the sup-
ply air is slightly higher than the required value. The reason
for the dierence mainly lies in that, the less the ow rate of
process air is, the more the process air can be dehumidied.
As demonstrated in Fig. 6, when V
a,d
is 2600 m
3
/h, the
average moisture removal is 2.63 g/kg after the 1st stage
and 4.15 g/kg after the 2nd stage, with a maximum value
5.13 g/kg. However, when V
a,d
is 1800 m
3
/h, corresponding
values are 3.15 g/kg, 5.14 g/kg and 6.28 g/kg, respectively.
These results have a good agreement with the experimental
data reported by Ge et al. (2009). It is indicated that the
dehumidication ability of the TSDC unit is reliable. Addi-
tionally, the increase of moisture removal suggests that the
Table 2
Operating parameters on 22nd July 2008.
Parameters Value
Hot water ow rate (m
3
/h) 0.63
Flow rate of regeneration air 1 (m
3
/h) 1000
Flow rate of regeneration air 2 (m
3
/h) 1000
Process air ow rate of VAC unit (m
3
/h) 5000
Fig. 4. Variations of inlet and outlet hot water temperatures of the TSDC
unit, solar radiant intensity and ambient temperature on 22nd July, 2008.
3002 D. La et al. / Solar Energy 85 (2011) 29973009
dehumidication capacity can be improved and optimized
by adjusting the air ow rate.
Fig. 7 illustrates the measured air treatment process
when V
a,d
is 1800 m
3
/h. All the state points are depicted
on the basis of corresponding average dry bulb tempera-
tures and humidity ratios over the test time. It can be found
that the humidity ratio of process air is reduced by the
solar driven TSDC unit for two times (1-2 and 3-4). Fur-
thermore, the temperature of process air is also controlled
at relatively low value (2-3 and 4-5). These indicate that the
two-stage design of the desiccant cooling system is bene-
cial to the improvement of moisture removal and the eect
of adsorption heat can be inhibited eectively by adopting
intercoolers. Also found is that, except being cooled further
(5-S), the humidity ratio of the process air passing through
the TSDC unit is also reduced, which is dierent from the
evolution of air treatment under ARI summer condition in
Fig. 3. This indicates that, for high humid climate, it is dif-
cult for stand alone solar driven DCS to handle latent
heat load totally, especially when solar radiant intensity
is not strong enough. In this case, the incorporation of
VAC system is recommended, in order that comfort supply
air can be ensured.
Investigations on the performances of the solar driven
TSDC unit suggest that the cooling capacity has reached
the design value 10 kW, with a thermal COP over 1.0
and electric COP over 10, as shown in Fig. 8. The decrease
of COP
d,e
is due to that, when the ow rate of process air
decreases, the cooling capacity of the TSDC unit decreases
too, whereas corresponding power consumption almost
Fig. 5. Ambient air conditions and supply air conditions; the area in the dashed lines characterizes the qualied supply air region.
Fig. 6. Variations of moisture removal capacities.
Fig. 7. Psychrometric chart representation for a typical operation
(V
a,d
= 1800 m
3
/h).
Fig. 8. Variations of thermal COP, electric COP and cooling capacity of
the TSDC unit.
D. La et al. / Solar Energy 85 (2011) 29973009 3003
keeps constant. However, the consumption of regeneration
heat also decreases, as reected by the change of the tem-
perature dierence of inlet and outlet hot waters in
Fig. 4, which leads to the slight variation of COP
d,t
. Any-
way, the sounded performance of the solar driven TSDC
unit suggests that the power consumption of the air condi-
tioning system can be reduced signicantly by adopting the
solar driven TSDC unit to remove the latent heat load of
fresh air. It should be pointed out that, in practical appli-
cation, due to the fact that both ambient and indoor con-
ditions vary with time and weather, it is quite dicult to
obtain fair comparison under dierent operating condi-
tions. Therefore, we have focused on presenting the perfor-
mance of the system under typical local conditions.
Detailed information about the eect of regeneration tem-
perature on system performance, which has been obtained
via experimental tests in lab, can be found in the paper by
Ge et al. (2009).
4.3. Energy saving analysis
To nd out the energy saving potential of the hybrid sys-
tem, tests were also carried out for the VAC unit. Based on
the results, the operating characteristics of the hybrid solar
air conditioning system are calculated with Eqs. (2)(17)
and summarized in Table 3. It is found that: (1) under typ-
ical weather conditions, 35.7% of the cooling output can be
contributed by the solar TSDC unit; (2) in comparison with
the air-source VAC unit, the electric power consumption
can be reduced by about 71.4% and 25.5% by the solar
TSDC unit and the hybrid system, respectively; (3) how-
ever, the COP based on primary energy usage of the TSDC
unit (0.91) and the hybrid system (0.96) are relatively lower
than that of the VAC unit (0.98), and thus corresponding
primary energy saving rate are negative (i.e. 8.1% and
2.9%). It is suggested that under typical hot humid condi-
tions, the solar hybrid system is benecial to electric power
saving but not primary energy. This is in accordance with
the investigation reported by Sheridan and Mitchell
(1985), namely, in hot and humid climate, the hybrid cycle
may even use more energy than a conventional system. Yet,
it should be noted that, the electric power saving potential
of the hybrid system is great and favorable compared with
the slight increase in primary energy intake. Moreover, the
heat source of the system is low-grade and renewable,
which is advantageous in environmental protection. There-
fore, the solar hybrid system is still a good choice in
general.
5. Theoretical analysis
In this section, a simulation model based on TRNSYS
16 is created to evaluate the energy saving potential and
applicability of the solar hybrid air conditioning system.
Seasonal thermodynamic performance is analyzed. Feasi-
bility discussion is performed under various weather condi-
tions. Fig. 9 shows the components and their connections
of the solar TSDC system in TRNSYS simulation studio.
Specic assumptions, which are based on the installed sys-
tem and the monitored results, are listed in Table 4.
The model was validated using the test data on 22 July,
2008. Eectiveness of the heat exchangers on regeneration
air side was set as 0.58, and that of the intercoolers on pro-
cess air side were set as 0.5 and 0.53 according to the test
results. Two key parameters, namely, the outlet tempera-
ture and humidity ratio of the air processed by the solar
driven TSDC unit (state 5), have been studied. As depicted
in Fig. 10, the predicted and the experimental data agree
well. The mean deviation is about 9.2% for temperature
and 4.6% for humidity ratio. Due to the unavoidable air
leakage during test, the experimental data are general
higher than the simulation results. The relatively higher
discrepancy of temperature can be explained by that: (1)
the experimental test was switched from the condition of
V
a,d
= 2600 m
3
/h to the condition for comparison (V
a,d
=
1800 m
3
/h), which raised a high discrepancy at the starting
phase as shown in Fig. 10; (2) in practical application, the
hot dehumidied air was usually sensibly cooled along the
passage to some degree, which resulted in some increase in
discrepancy. Considering the facts that the latter would
lead to better system performance and the deviation for
humidity ratio is favorable, the accuracy of prediction is
thought to be acceptable.
5.1. Seasonal performance analysis
The typical meteorological year (TMY) data of Shang-
hai is used. Constant solar collector area, water tank vol-
ume, hot water ow rate and process air ow rate of the
TSDC unit, which are set as 72 m
2
, 1 m
3
, 630 kg/h and
1200 m
3
/h, respectively, are adopted. The process air ow
rate of the TSDC unit, namely, the ventilation rate of the
conditioned space, is determined by the required minimum
fresh air volume m
fresh,a
= 30 m
3
/h person 0. 25 person/
m
2
160 m
2
= 1200 m
3
/h. While the ow rate of the air
handled by the VAC unit is set as 5000 m
3
/h, the ventila-
tion rate is about 19% of the process air of the hybrid
system.
Table 3
Combined operating characteristics of the solar hybrid desiccant air
conditioning system.
Solar
driven
TSDC
Air-source
VAC
Hybrid
system
Cooling capacity (kW) 10.9 19.6 30.5
Electrical load (kW) 0.95 5.97 6.92
Thermal load (kW) 8.79 8.79
Weighted primary energy load (kW) 11.95 19.88 31.83
Electric COP 11.48 3.28 4.41
Thermal COP 1.24
COP based on primary energy usage 0.91 0.98 0.96
Solar fraction (%) 35.7
Electric power saving rate (%) 71.4 25.5
Primary energy saving rate (%) 8.1 2.9
3004 D. La et al. / Solar Energy 85 (2011) 29973009
Fig. 11 shows the daily humidity load of the conditioned
space and the daily moisture removal ability of the solar
driven TSDC unit. The humidity load for 41 days (34%)
can be totally handled by the TSDC unit and the rest needs
Fig. 9. TRNSYS simulation studio project of the solar air conditioning system.
Table 4
Specic assumptions used in the simulation.
Item Factor
Building heat load
Enclosure (1) Wall: area 87 m
2
, heat transfer coecient 1.53 W/(m
2
K)
(2) Window: area 36 m
2
, heat transfer coecient 2.9 W/(m
2
K)
(3) Ceiling: area 80 m
2
, heat transfer coecient 0.7 W/(m
2
K)
(4) Cooling load is neglected for oor and internal walls and widows, which are surrounded by conditioned rooms
Lighting 20 W/m
2
Equipment 40 W/m
2
People (1) Occupancy rate: 4 m
2
per person
(2) Percentage of men, women and children: 0.925
(3) Fresh air requirement: 30 m
3
/h per person
(4) Shanghai, T
indoor
= 27 C, RH
indoor
= 60% (local typical indoor conditions), moisture production rate: 194 g/h/person, latent
load production rate:130 W/person, sensible load production rate: 51 W/person (Zhao et al., 2008)
Solar air conditioning system
Solar collecting (1) Performance model of solar collector: type1b TRNSYS solar collector model
(2) Water tank: type4c with loss coecient of 2.5 kJ/(h tm
2
K) and initial temperature of 50 C
TSDC (1) Desiccant wheel: the similar mathematical model of desiccant wheel, which has been developed in our earlier work (Zhang
et al., 2003), is used in present study
(2) Regeneration air: the ow rate of regeneration air is kept as 1/3 of process air to reduce regeneration heat consumption without
substantial inuence on dehumidication capacity (Ge et al., 2009)
(3) Eciency of heat exchanger: 0.8
VAC (1) Cooling mode: the unit is presumed to have the same electric coecient performance as test results, namely, 3.28
(2) Dehumidication mode: power consumed by reheating process is determined according to the supply air state
Control strategy (1) Heat storage mode: run when outlet temperature of solar collector is higher than that of water tank to heat source, otherwise
stop
(2) Heat supply mode: run when the temperature to load of water tank is above 60 C during business hours (from 9:00 to 17:00)
D. La et al. / Solar Energy 85 (2011) 29973009 3005
the assistance of VAC unit. However, for seasonal total
humidity load, about 69% can be handled by the TSDC
unit and the rest 31% by the VAC unit.
The monthly and seasonal cooling consumption is
shown in Fig. 12. About 33% of the total cooling is pro-
vided by the solar driven TSDC unit and the rest 67% by
the VAC unit. In view of the fact that cooling load consists
of sensible load and latent load, which are mainly removed
by the VAC unit and the TSDC unit, respectively, the con-
tribution of the solar driven TSDC unit is considerable.
Besides, the seasonal thermal performance of the hybrid
system is also proved to be sounded, with an average ther-
mal COP about 0.85.
To quantify the electric power saving potential of the
hybrid solar air conditioning system, a standalone VACsys-
tem is considered. The VAC system is designed and selected
to obtain similar values of air change rate and temperature
dierence between supply air and indoor air. The ow rate
of fresh air handled by the VAC system is also determined
by the required minimum fresh air volume m
fresh,a
=
30 m
3
/h person 0. 25 person/m
2
160 m
2
= 1200 m
3
/h,
which equals the ow rate of air processed by the TSDC
unit in the hybrid system. This ensures fair comparison to
some degree. The installed capacity of the hybrid system
and the conventional system are given in Table 5. Based
on seasonal simulation, it is found that about 34% of elec-
tric power can be saved by the hybrid system in comparison
with the conventional system. It should be noted that, as the
focus of this work is the performance of the solar hybrid
system in summer, its potential for providing domestic
hot water during transition season and heating the space
in winter has not been included here. In the case of all-year
round operation, the solar hybrid system would be more
energy ecient.
It is known that, indoor conditions usually impact the
thermodynamic performance of the air conditioning system
greatly. In view of this, the performance of the system has
been compared under two dierent cases: (1) case 1 with
relatively low enthalpy (22 C, 50% RH) and (2) case 2
based on local standard (27 C, 60% RH). For case 1, heat
gains from occupant are determined with moisture produc-
tion rate of 150 g/h/person, latent load production rate of
100 W/person and sensible load production rate of 81 W/
person (Zhao et al., 2008). Other assumptions are of the
same as those of case 2 listed in Table 4. The results are
given in Table 6. It is found that, the key indexes of case
Fig. 10. Comparison between the experimental and simulation results.
Fig. 11. Contribution of solar driven TSDC unit to moisture removal (1st June to 30 September, Shanghai).
Fig. 12. Contribution of solar driven TSDC unit to space cooling
(Shanghai).
3006 D. La et al. / Solar Energy 85 (2011) 29973009
2 (27 C, 60% RH), like contribution of moisture removal
by solar TSDC unit, solar fraction and electric power sav-
ing rate, are more favorable than those of case 1 (22 C,
50% RH). With a relatively lower indoor temperature
and relative humidity, case 1 (22 C, 50% RH) consumes
about 29% more cooling power than case 2 (27 C, 60%
RH). As a result, corresponding electric power consump-
tion is increased by about 33%. It is indicated that the
lower the indoor conditions are, the worse the energy per-
formance will be. Therefore, for the sake of energy saving,
the indoor conditions should be kept at relatively high level
based on local climate and standard.
5.2. Feasibility discussion
The feasibility discussion is performed by simulating the
solar hybrid system under the weather conditions of Beijing
and Hong Kong, which are temperate and extreme humid
and dierent from Shanghai (humid). Also, local TMY
data are used. According to primary simulation results,
the discussed system in Section 5.1 can meet the require-
ment of the conditioned space generally both for Beijing
and Hong Kong (Indoor conditions: 26.7 C, 50%). Thus,
the same system is considered. Considering the fact that
economic performance is mainly determined by initial cost
as manufacture fee and energy price and varies with time
and location, the feasibility of the system will be evaluated
on the basis of thermodynamic performance analysis here.
Table 7 shows the performance of the solar hybrid sys-
tem under the conditions of Beijing and Hong Kong.
Acceptable cooling capacity and moisture removal ability
are achieved, with an average thermal COP of 0.95 and
0.87 for Beijing and Hong Kong. Corresponding solar frac-
tion are 33.3% and 27.7%, respectively. Additionally, sea-
sonal electric power saving rate are about 31% and 22%
for Beijing and Hong Kong. These suggest that the two-
stage design solar hybrid air conditioning system is applica-
ble to a wide range of weather conditions.
Comparisons of the contribution and electric power sav-
ing rate raised by solar driven TSDC unit among Beijing,
Shanghai and Hong Kong are depicted in Fig. 13. As
expected, all the indexes of Shanghai are higher than those
of the other two cities, due to the design of the TSDC unit
is based on Shanghai weather condition. Besides, the rela-
tively lower indexes of Hong Kong can be explained by
that the capacity of the TSDC unit is a bit small to cover
the latent heat load. In practical application, these indexes
can be further increased by optimizing the TSDC unit.
The dierence of thermal COP among the three cities
(Beijing 0.95, Shanghai 0.85, Hong Kong 0.87) is due to
that, on the one hand, the solar radiant intensity of Shang-
hai and Hong Kong are much higher than that of Beijing,
which means more heat will be consumed by the TSDC
unit there; on the other hand, since ambient air is used as
regeneration air, the regeneration procedure is limited by
Table 5
Comparison of hybrid system and conventional system in Shanghai (1st
June to 30 September).
Hybrid system Conventional
system
Installed capacity
TSDC unit 10 kW
VAC unit 20 kW 30 kW
Energy performance
Electric power
consumption (kW h)
10,018 15,151
(2102 kW h by TSDC;
7916 kW h by VAC)
Electric power saving
rate (%)
33.9
Table 6
Performance comparison between two typical indoor conditions (1st June
to 30 September, Shanghai).
Case 1 Case 2
Indoor conditions 22 C, 50% 27 C, 60%
Cooling consumption (kW h) 28,072 19,776
Electric power consumption (kW h) 15,128 10,018
Contribution of moisture removal by TSDC
unit (%)
52.5 68.8
Solar fraction (%) 23.6 33.5
Electric power saving rate (%) 26.7 33.9
Table 7
Performance of solar hybrid system in Beijing and Hong Kong (1st June to
30 September).
Beijing Hong
Kong
Solar TSDC unit
Average cooling capacity (kW) 8.3 7.6
Average moisture removal (g/kg) 7.4 7.7
Average thermal COP 0.95 0.87
Hybrid system
Contribution to moisture removal by the TSDC
unit (%)
56.5 55.2
Solar fraction (%) 33.3 27.7
Electric power saving rate (%) 31.0 21.5
Fig. 13. Performance comparisons among Beijing, Shanghai and Hong
Kong.
D. La et al. / Solar Energy 85 (2011) 29973009 3007
the high humid condition for Shanghai and Hong Kong,
which leads to relatively lower dehumidication and cool-
ing potential (Henning, 2007). As a result, the seasonal
average thermal COP of Beijing (0.95) is higher than those
of Shanghai (0.85) and Hong Kong (0.87), which are of
about the same.
6. Conclusions
By combining solar driven two-stage rotary desiccant
cooling and air-source vapor compression air-conditioning,
a solar hybrid desiccant air conditioning system was
designed and installed in an oce building. Its performance
was monitored during the summer of 2008, from July to
September. The experimental results were presented and
discussed. Based on the installed system, a simulation
model was created in TRNSYS simulation studio. Detailed
theoretical analysis was performed. Following conclusions
can be drawn:
(1) The operation of the studied solar driven two-stage
desiccant cooling system is conrmed to be reliable
and energy ecient. Under typical local condition,
it can achieve an average cooling capacity 10.9 kW,
with corresponding average thermal COP and electric
COP reaching 1.24 and 11.48, respectively.
(2) To ensure the air quality of supply air, vapor com-
pression air conditioning system is advised to be
incorporated in humid climate, especially for the area
without good solar radiant intensity.
(3) Seasonal analysis on the solar hybrid system suggests
that the solar driven TSDC unit can handle about
33% of the cooling load, with an average thermal
COP of 0.85 under Shanghai summer condition.
Moreover, it removes about 69% of the moisture
load. As a result, the electric power consumption is
reduced by about 34% in comparison with conven-
tional system.
(4) Indoor conditions, which have signicant inuence
on system energy performance, should be kept at rel-
atively high level based on local climate and standard.
(5) The solar hybrid system is feasible to not only humid
weather condition (Shanghai) but also temperate
(Beijing) and extreme humid (Hong Kong) weather
conditions. Thermal COP of 0.95 and 0.87, with a
solar fraction of 33.3% and 27.7%, can be achieved
under Beijing and Hong Kong weather conditions.
Corresponding seasonal electric power saving rates
are about 31% and 22%, respectively.
It is proved that the two-stage rotary desiccant cooling
system is feasible for solar driven air-conditioning applica-
tion. Being incorporated with vapor compression system,
it can deal with most of the latent load and thus save elec-
tric power greatly. These mean that the hybrid energy sys-
tem is promising and worthwhile for future research and
application.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the State Key Science
and Technologies Program under the Contract No.
2008BAJ12B01, and Shanghai International Collaboration
Program under the Contract No. 09160702300.
References
Ahmed, M.H., Kattab, N.M., Fouad, M., 2005. Evaluation and optimi-
zation of solar desiccant wheel performance. Renewable Energy 30,
305325.
Ali, C., Bacha, H.B., Baccar, M., Maalej, A.Y., 2007. Dynamic modeling
and simulation of a new air conditioning prototype by solar energy.
Renewable Energy 32, 200215.
Bourdoukan, P., Wurtz, E., Joubert, P., Sperandio, M., 2008. Potential
of solar heat pipe vacuum collectors in the desiccant cooling
process: modelling and experimental results. Solar Energy 82, 1209
1219.
Dai, Y.J., Wang, R.Z., Xu, Y.X., 2002. Study of a solar powered solid
adsorptiondesiccant cooling system used for grain storage. Renew-
able Energy 25, 417430.
Ge, T.S., Li, Y., Wang, R.Z., Dai, Y.J., 2009. Experimental study on a
two-stage rotary desiccant cooling system. International Journal of
Refrigeration 32, 498508.
Ge, T.S., Li, Y., Dai, Y.J., Wang, R.Z., 2010. Performance investigation
on a novel two-stage solar driven rotary desiccant cooling system using
composite desiccant materials. Solar Energy 84, 157159.
Halliday, S.P., Beggs, C.B., Sleigh, P.A., 2002. The use of solar desiccant
cooling in the UK: a feasibility study. Applied Thermal Engineering
22, 13271338.
Hassan, M.M., Beliveau, Y., 2008. Modeling of an integrated solar
system. Building and Environment 43, 804810.
Henning, H.M., 2007. Solar assisted air conditioning of buildings an
overview. Applied Thermal Engineering 27, 17341749.
Henning, H.M., Erpenbeck, T., Hindenburg, C., Santamaria, I.S., 2001.
The potential of solar energy use in desiccant cooling cycles.
International Journal of Refrigeration 24, 220229.
Hirunlabh, J., Charoenwat, R., Khedari, J., Teekasap, S., 2007. Feasibility
study of desiccant air-conditioning system in Thailand. Building and
Environment 42, 572577.
Jia, C.X., Dai, Y.J., Wu, J.Y., Wang, R.Z., 2006. Analysis on a hybrid
desiccant air-conditioning system. Applied Thermal Engineering 26,
23932400.
Joudi, K.A., Dhaidan, N.S., 2001. Application of solar assisted heating
and desiccant cooling systems for a domestic building. Energy
Conversion and Management 42, 9951022.
Khalid, A., Mahmood, M., Asif, M., Muneer, T., 2009. Solar assisted,
pre-cooled hybrid desiccant cooling system for Pakistan. Renewable
Energy 34, 151157.
Li, Y., Sumathy, K., Dai, Y.J., Wang, R.Z., 2006. Experimental study on
a hybrid desiccant dehumidication and air conditioning system.
Journal of Solar Energy Engineering 128, 7782.
Mavroudaki, P., Beggs, C.B., Sleigh, P.A., Halliday, S.P., 2002. The
potential for solar powered single-stage desiccant cooling in southern
Europe. Applied Thermal Engineering 22, 11291140.
Mei, L., Ineld, D., Eicker, U., Loveday, D., Fux, V., 2006. Cooling
potential of ventilated PV fac ade and solar air heaters combined with a
desiccant cooling machine. Renewable Energy 31, 12651278.
Murphy, P., 2005. IEA Solar Heating & Cooling Programme, 2004
Annual Report, Washington, USA.
Sheridan, J.C., Mitchell, J.W., 1985. A hybrid solar desiccant cooling
system. Solar Energy 34, 187193.
Sumathy, K., Yeung, K.H., Li, Y., 2003. Technology development in the
solar adsorption refrigeration systems. Progress in Energy and
Combustion Science 29, 301327.
3008 D. La et al. / Solar Energy 85 (2011) 29973009
Vitte, T., Brau, J., Chatagnon, N., Woloszyn, M., 2008. Proposal for a
new hybrid control strategy of a solar desiccant evaporative cooling air
handling unit. Energy and Buildings 40, 896905.
Wang, R.Z., Ge, T.S., Chen, C.J., Ma, Q., Xiong, Z.Q., 2009. Solar
sorption cooling systems for residential applications: options and
guidelines. International Journal of Refrigeration 32, 638660.
White, S.D., Kohlenbach, P., Bongs, C., 2009. Indoor temperature
variations resulting from solar desiccant cooling in a building without
thermal backup. International Journal of Refrigeration 32, 695704.
Zhang, H., Niu, J.L., 1999. Two-stage desiccant cooling system using low-
temperature heat. Building Services Engineering Research and Tech-
nology 20, 5155.
Zhang, X.J., Dai, Y.J., Wang, R.Z., 2003. A simulation study of heat and
mass transfer in a honeycombed rotary desiccant dehumidier.
Applied Thermal Engineering 23, 9891003.
Zhao, R.Y., Fan, C.Y., Xue, D.H., Qian, Y.M., 2008. Air Conditioning.
China Architecture and Building Press, p.53.
D. La et al. / Solar Energy 85 (2011) 29973009 3009