Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 9


Malvern Instruments Worldwide

Sales and service centres in over 65 countries
2014 Malvern Instruments Limited
Enhanced dry powder particle size
measurements using the Aero S disperser
Understanding the behavior of dry powders is important in many applications, whether
it relates to the fundamental properties of the particles, their flowability for processing,
or the ability to target the deposition of a material.
In order to characterize these materials accurately, it is essential for a dry powder
disperser to be able to control the aerodynamic dispersion of a wide range of materials;
from friable to robust materials and from free-flowing to extremely cohesive materials.
The inter-particle forces that bind particles together include van der Waals forces,
electrostatics and liquid bridges. Furthermore, as particles become finer the relative
strength of these forces increase and therefore smaller particles are much more of a
challenge to disperse.
There are three main mechanisms available to overcome these inter-particle forces
and disperse dry powders. These mechanisms, in increasing order of aggression,
are illustrated in Figure 3 (a) velocity gradients caused by shear stress, (b) particle
to particle collisions and (c) particle to wall collisions. The importance of each of
these mechanisms to a particular disperser will depend on the geometry, flow rate
(or pressure drop) and material type. For any sample dry powder dispersion is a fine
balance between effective dispersion and the risk of breaking the primary particles,
associated with the more aggressive dispersion mechanisms.
The Aero S
The Aero S dry powder disperser unit has a modular design which allows the
configuration of the dispersion unit to be optimized for different materials. This
optimization relates to both the flow of materials with different tray designs and an
adjustable hopper in order to control the sample feed (Figure 2), as well as a range
of venturis suitable for dispersing fragile, robust and cohesive materials. All of these
modular components are automatically recognized by the software so the set up
for each sample is always recorded and can be locked into a standard operating
procedure (SOP).
The modular design of the Aero S allows venturis with different geometries to be used
in order to make use of the different mechanisms available for dry powder dispersion.
The disperser designs were selected by evaluating the performance of several
different geometries on a range of materials with different bulk powder properties. The
bulk powder properties were assessed by shear testing and the material were then
2 Enhanced dry powder particle size measurements using the Aero S disperser
classified as being between not flowing, through very cohesive and cohesive to free
Figure 1: Mastersizer 3000 and Aero S
Figure 2: Modular hopper, tray and venturi assembly
3 Enhanced dry powder particle size measurements using the Aero S disperser
Figure 3: Mechanisms for dry powder dispersion
The dispersion efficiency achieved for a particular material is evaluated by comparing
measurements of the dry dispersion to a well dispersed wet reference result. Wet
results are considered to be the reference method as generally a higher energy is
available for dispersion (due to the addition of surfactants, additives and ultrasound)
without the aggression of the dry mechanisms. The degree of overlap between the two
particle size distributions is defined as the dispersion efficiency, 100% being complete
agreement and perfect dispersion. The two disperser designs which showed the
highest dispersion efficiency over the range of materials were then developed for use
with the Aero S. The fundamental study of dry powder dispersion is described in more
detail in a separate article [1].
Disperser geometries
The two disperser geometries that can be used with the Aero S are a standard venturi
and a high energy venturi.
The standard venturi provides effective dispersion without using the more aggressive
dispersion mechanisms. It has no impaction surfaces and therefore uses velocity
gradients and particle to particle collisions to disperse the particles. Figure 4 (a) shows
a schematic of the standard venturi and the path taken by the particles. The sample
drops down from the sample tray into the funnel and the compressed air used to
disperse the particles enters at right angles. The particles are then accelerated through
the venturi and the dispersed sample passes directly through the measurement zone.
The lack of an impaction surface makes this venturi particularly suited to dispersing
fragile samples.
In the high energy venturi the particle are entrained into the airflow, and accelerated
in the same way as the standard venturi. The particles then flow through a 90degree
bend creating an impaction zone. This impaction zone provides high energy dispersion
by particle to wall collisions and is suitable for very cohesive and robust particles.
4 Enhanced dry powder particle size measurements using the Aero S disperser
Figure 4: Standard (a) and High Energy (b) venturi for the Aero S
The ability to choose between a standard venturi using mainly shear forces and a
high energy venturi using impaction increases the range of materials for which dry
dispersion is suitable.
Assessing the state of dispersion
The degree of dispersion achieved by any venturi is dependent on the air pressure
used. Hence, to assess the dispersion of a material the size distribution is measured
over a range of pressures (this is referred to as a pressure titration). Figure 5 shows
the results of a pressure titration carried out on a milk powder sample using the
standard venturi. In general a decrease in particle size is observed with increasing
pressure. However, this decrease can be the result of two processes; firstly the
dispersion of agglomerates within the sample and secondly breakage of the primary
particles. It is thereforenecessary to determine the appropriate pressure at which
to measure the sample to achieve dispersion but not to break the primary particles.
Comparisons of the dry results over a range of pressures (using the standard venturi)
compared to the dispersed wet result (after ultrasound) are shown in Figure 6. These
results show that at low pressures (0.1bar and 0.5 bar are shown in this example) there
are agglomerates still present in the results which indicates that full dispersion has not
been achieved. At higher pressures, 3bar, the agreement between the wet and dry
results is excellent, suggesting full dispersion has been achieved.
Figure 5: Pressure titration using the standard venturi
5 Enhanced dry powder particle size measurements using the Aero S disperser
Figure 6: Wet (blue curve)-dry comparison using the standard venturi
Figure 7: Milk powder pressure titration using the high energy venturi
Figure 8: Milk powder wet-(blue curve) - dry comparison, high energy venturi
A pressure titration for the same milk powder sample has also been measured using
the high energy venturi, Figure 7.
For a given pressure a smaller size is measured using the high energy venturi
(compared to the standard) due to the additional dispersion by impaction. Again a
comparison of the wet and dry results has been used to assess the state of dispersion
and to determine at which pressure dispersion but not particle breakage has occurred.
Figure 8 shows the comparison of dry results using the high energy venturi at 1bar,
3bar, and 4bar to the dispersed wet result. This shows excellent agreement between
the wet and dry results at low pressure, 1bar. However, at higher pressures (3bar
and 4 bar) the dry result is smaller than the wet result which indicates that the primary
particles have been broken down at higher pressures. This example shows that both
venturis, using different dispersion mechanisms, can disperse the milk powder sample
(although at different pressures) the next step is to choose which venturi is the most
appropriate for this sample. Figure 10 shows the pressure titrations (Dv50) on both
venturis and the Dv50 of the dispersed wet result for comparison. This shows that
6 Enhanced dry powder particle size measurements using the Aero S disperser
comparable results are achieved at 1bar using the high energy venturi and at between
3bar and 4bar using the standard venturi. The range of pressures over which the wet
and dry results agree can be used to determine which venturi is most appropriate. The
decrease in size around 1bar is quite steep on the high energy venturi where as the
relationship between size and pressure is more stable between 3bar and 4 bar on the
standard venturi indicating a greater robustness in the results to pressure. Therefore
for this relatively fragile material the standard venturi provides a much more robust
result over a range of pressures.
Figure 10: Pressure titration (Dv50) on both venturis compared to the wet result
Increased dynamic range
Dry measurements can be made on the Mastersizer 3000 from 0.1m up to 3500m.
This extended dynamic range is an essential requirement for the analysis of coffee
samples, where the particle size affects both the flavor and the speed of brewing.
Figure 9 shows the particle size distribution of a three grades of coffee (filter, smooth
and espresso) where the size distribution extends from 10m up to 3500m.
Dry dispersion also offers advantages for measuring large or polydisperse materials
in terms of the mass of sample which can easily be measured. As the particle size
increases so does the mass of sample required in order to get a representative
sample of the bulk. In dry diffraction measurements a greater mass of sample
can be measured as the sample is gradually fed through the measurement zone
at the appropriate concentration. Hence to measure a larger mass of sample the
measurement duration is simply increased.
At the other end of the dynamic range materials become much more difficult to
disperse, as the inter-particle forces increase as the particle size gets smaller.
7 Enhanced dry powder particle size measurements using the Aero S disperser
Figure 9: Example of a measurement of filter, espresso and smooth coffee (standard venturi)
Figure 11: Example of a pigment measured dry (high energy venturi)
Figure 11 shows the particle size distribution of a pigment sample measured on the
Aero S. As this sample is very cohesive it has been dispersed using the high energy
venturi at 4bar. The reproducibility of the dispersion has been tested by measuring
several sub samples of the same batch the results of which are shown in Figure 12.
The results show the coefficient of variance over the 10 repeat measurements is within
the ISO limits for repeatability [2], indicating reproducible dispersion for this very fine
cohesive material.
The wide dynamic range of the Mastersizer 3000 and the modular design of the
Aero S have opened up dry laser diffraction measurements to a much wider range of
The range of sample trays and an adjustable height hopper allow the sample flow to be
controlled for both free-flowing and cohesive materials.
Sample dispersion can then be optimized by the use of either the standard or high
energy venturi, providing solutions for materials that are fragile or robust, free-flowing
or cohesive.
8 Enhanced dry powder particle size measurements using the Aero S disperser
Figure 12: Reproducibility over 10 measurements of a pigment sample
[1] Investigating the Dispersion of Dry Powders. MRK1654-01
[2] ISO 13320:2009 Particle size analysis -- Laser diffraction methods
2014 Malvern Instruments Limited
Malvern Instruments Limited
Grovewood Road, Malvern,
Worcestershire, UK. WR14
Tel: +44 1684 892456
Fax: +44 1684 892789
Malvern Instruments is partof Spectris plc, the PrecisionInstrumentation and ControlsCompany.
Spectris and the Spectris logo areTrade Marks of Spectris plc.
All information supplied within is correct at time of publication.
Malvern Instruments pursues a policy of continual improvement due to technicaldevelopment. We therefore reserve
the right to deviate from information, descriptions, andspecifications in this publication without notice. Malvern
Instruments shall not be liable forerrors contained herein or for incidental or consequential damages in connection with
thefurnishing, performance or use of this material.
Malvern Instruments owns the following registered trademarks: Bohlin, FIPA, Insitec, ISYS, Kinexus, Malvern, Malvern
'Hills' logo, Mastersizer, Morphologi, Rosand, 'SEC-MALS', Viscosizer, Viscotek, Viscogel and Zetasizer.