3.

ANALYSIS COMMUNITY
Statement
community can be called and classified according to (1)Form or nature of the main
structure, for example the type of the domain, the forms of life or indicators, (2)Physical
habitat of community, (3) Functional properties, for example the type of community
metabolism
There are no definite rules for the naming of the community that have been
formulated, such as the classification of organisms !lassification based structural properties
is rather specific to a particular environment efforts "ere made to create a universal
classification is based on the basic unsatisfactory functional properties provide a better basis
to compare all the communities in unbelievably different habitats, such as land, sea or
fresh"ater community analysis in a particular geographical area of land has been put span
t"o opposite land# (1) approach the $one in "hich the community riris%i%y dis&ointed %no"n,
classification and registered in the list of types of communities and (2) a gradient analysis
approach that involves preparation populations along the gradient or a lot "ith the
introduction of the basic concepts in the spread'deployment fre(uency, similarity coefficient,
other statistical comparisons )n general, the steep gradient of the curvature of the more real
communities are not only due to the possibility of sudden change is greater than the physical
environment but because of the limits and sharpened by competition bet"een types of
evolutionary events that interact mutually dependent
Explenation and examples
First of all let*s revie" of the naming and classification on the basis of the structure
because the community is composed of organisms, many ecologists feel that the community
should be named according to the important organisms the best "ay to refer to a community
because it is by ta%ing some clear and steady nature, "hether living or not good, use it in the
name if binatan'animal basis very stri%ing example binatng'animal basis sessile marine tidal
habitat can be named as oyster garden or barnacle communities in general the inclusion
pencantumann animal names very moving into the community name is not satisfactory
because the animals generally too diverse components from time ' to time , there is rarely a
long'term dominance +ag clear by one or t"o types
,helford has advocated incorporate animals into the community name to affirm that both
animals and plants is an integral part of the biotic community there may be similarities
bet"een the communities and species that are restricted in terms of both sharper than the
other one "hen the gradient is not sustainable environment and evolution
in the analysis of dross community is important to mnganggap gradient time, both at the level
of development and on the evolutionary scale is longer

Gbr -nalisis gradien mengenai perubahan'
perubahan vegetasi sepan&ang lereng curam dan
dibanding%an dengan lereng landai