0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
75 vues4 pages
Applied Linguistics deals with the impasse between two opposites views of language--description and prescription. Direct method is a method that refrains from using the learners' native language and just uses the target language. Communicative language teaching is an approach to the teaching of languages that emphasizes interaction as both the means and the ultimate goal of learning a language.
Applied Linguistics deals with the impasse between two opposites views of language--description and prescription. Direct method is a method that refrains from using the learners' native language and just uses the target language. Communicative language teaching is an approach to the teaching of languages that emphasizes interaction as both the means and the ultimate goal of learning a language.
Applied Linguistics deals with the impasse between two opposites views of language--description and prescription. Direct method is a method that refrains from using the learners' native language and just uses the target language. Communicative language teaching is an approach to the teaching of languages that emphasizes interaction as both the means and the ultimate goal of learning a language.
1. What is Applied Linguistic ? a. Applied Linguistics is the academic discipline concern with the relation of knowledge about language to decision making in the real world, and sets out to investigate problems in which language is implicated. b. Applied Linguistic as the academic discipline concerned with the relation of knowledge about language to decision making in the real world.
2. What is the focus of AL? To solve the problems with which applied linguistic is concerned.
3. Mention some areas of AL ? a. Language testing b. Education
4. Applied Linguistic deals with the impasse between two opposites views of languagedescription and prescription. How do you define those terms ? Description : The practice in linguistics of describing the varieties of a language without making value judgements about them or saying which varieties are correct Prescription : An approach to a language claiming there are absolute fixed rules which should be followed by everyone 5. What are the differences between direct and communicative method in ELT ? - direct method, sometimes also called natural method, is a method that refrains from using the learners' native language and just uses the target language. The direct method operates on the idea that second language learning must be an imitation of first language learning, as this is the natural way humans learn any language - a child never relies on another language to learn its first language, and thus the mother tongue is not necessary to learn a foreign language. This method places great stress on correct pronunciation and the target language from outset. It advocates teaching of oral skills at the expense of every traditional aim of language teaching. - Communicative language teaching (CLT) is an approach to the teaching of languages that emphasizes interaction as both the means and the ultimate goal of learning a language
SUMMARY PART 5 ( LANGUAGE AND COMMUNICATION ) BY : ISARIANTI, ELISA, ERTA 1. Knowing a language Traditional grammar translation language teaching, which we considered in chapter 4, assumed that knowing the rules of a language and being able to use them were are and the same thing. Yet there are many cases where someone knows the rules of a language but is still not a succesfull communicator. Other word, knowing the grammar and vocabulary of the language, although essential is one thing. Being able to put them to use involves other types of knowledge and ability as well. 2. Linguistic competence A good ideal of applied linguistic work has either followed on from them. Or defined itself in opposition to them. Chomskys idea is that the human capacity for language, as illustrated by a childs acquisition of the language around them, is not the product of general intelligence or learning ability, but an innate, genetically determined feature of the human special. 3. Communicative competence Hymes suggested, is four types of knowledge : a. Possibility Firstly, a communicatively competent speaker knows what is formally possible in a language i.e whether an instance conforms to the rules of grammar and pronounciation.for example : me go sleep now transgresses these rules, while Iam going to go to sleep now . Knowledge of possibility is not sufficient in itself for communication. b. Feasibility Is a communicatively competent person knows what is feasible. This is a psychological concept concerned with limitations to what can be processed by the mind, and is best illustrated by an example. - The cheese was green - The cheede the rat ate was green etc.. The notion of feasibility may seem a rather academic one and of little relevance to the practical applications of knowledge about language. c. Appropriateness This concerns the relationship of language or behavior to context, an such a wide range of phenomena. Appropilateness concerns conformity to social convention, and as such is fraught with controversy. Perhaps this is easiest to see in non- verbal communication. Example : the issue of appropriate dress for woman moving between western and Islamic culture. For applied linguistic there is no avoiding such issues. Language creates our identities and allows us to communicate with other . its study must be concerned with who imposes upon whom, and with the limits of social ceorcien and dissent. d. Attedness Hymes , fourth component of communicative competence is knowledge of attedness, i.e, whether Something is done. St first glance, this seems rather puzzling . for example the phrase chips and fish . From one of views this : possible ( it does not break any grammar rule ) Feasible ( it is easily processed and readily understandable ) Appropriate ( it does not contravene any sensitive social convention ) Nevertheless ( it does not occuras frequently as chips and fish )