Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
B
4
Peleg (Peleg, 1993)
X
e
k
1
a
n1
w
k
2
a
n2
w
5
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the DIC reactor. (I) processing vessel; (II)
vacuum tank; (III) decompression valve; (a) thermocouples; (b) and (c)
pressure sensor; (d) airlock system; (e) steamwater separator system; (V1)
and (V2) steam admission valve; (V3) outlet valve; (V4) air injection valve;
(P) to the vacuum pump; (S) air injection system.
P (atmospheric)
a
b
c
e
Time
P (vacuum)
Processing
pressure
d
Processing time
Fig. 2. Pressuretime prole of DIC processing cycle.
182 T. Iguedjtal et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 85 (2008) 180190
water activity
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
X
e
(
g
/
g
d
r
y
b
a
s
i
s
)
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
20 C
30 C
40 C
Kats & Kutarov
water activity
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
X
e
(
g
/
g
d
r
y
b
a
s
i
s
)
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
20 C
30 C
40 C
Peleg
Fig. 3. (a) Adsorption and (b) desorption isotherms of hot-air dried potato slices at 20 C, 30 C and 40 C.
water activity
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
X
e
(
g
/
g
d
r
y
b
a
s
i
s
)
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
20 C
30 C
40 C
Kats & Kutarov
water activity
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
X
e
(
g
/
g
d
r
y
b
a
s
i
s
)
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
20 C
30 C
40 C
Peleg
Fig. 4. (a) Adsorption and (b) desorption isotherms of texturized potato slices at 20 C, 30 C and 40 C (3 bar).
water activity
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
X
e
(
g
/
g
d
r
y
b
a
s
i
s
)
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
20 C
30 C
40 C
Kats & Kutarov
water activity
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
X
e
(
g
/
g
d
r
y
b
a
s
i
s
)
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
20 C
30 C
40 C
Peleg
Fig. 5. (a) Adsorption and (b) desorption isotherms of texturized potato slices at 20 C, 30 C and 40 C (6 bar).
T. Iguedjtal et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 85 (2008) 180190 183
placed in the hot-air drier until they reach a moisture con-
tent of approximately 3% dry basis.
2.4. Sorption isotherms method
The sorption isotherms were obtained by the gravimet-
ric method using an Autosorp 3.0 (Biosyste`me, Couter-
non, France) at 20, 30 and 40 C. The apparatus
comprises a closed chamber where temperature and rela-
tive humidity are regulated and controlled electronically
(0.2 C and 0.02%, respectively). A rotating disk sup-
ports and weighs the products automatically using an
electronic balance (0.0001 g). An internal ventilator pro-
vides a homogenous gas phase. For the adsorption pro-
cess, 6 g of dried sample was placed in the chamber
maintained at constant temperature. The relative humid-
ity of the chamber was controlled by an atomising humid-
ication system at values ranging from 5% to 80%. For
the desorption process, samples were held at 90% relative
humidity until equilibrium was reached. Then, silica gel
was used to attain relative humidities below 90%. The
samples were allowed to equilibrate until there was no
discernible weight change (0.0005 g). Samples reached
equilibrium between 4 and 6 days, depending on the tem-
perature and relative humidity. It took a longer time to
equilibrate samples at higher relative humidity and low
temperature than the ones at lower relative humidity
and higher temperature. Each experiment was carried
out in duplicate and average values were reported. The
equilibrium moisture content of each sample was deter-
mined with the help of a drying oven whose temperature
was xed at 105 C for 810 h (AOAC, 1980). The maxi-
mum relative error was 0.008 g H
2
O/g db.
2.5. Fitting sorption isotherms
The BET, GAB, Kats and Kutarov, Peleg and Oswin
models (Eqs. (1)(5), respectively, in Table 1) were tted
to the experimental data. The BET isotherm equation is
widely used due to its theoretical basis (Vazquez, Chenlo,
Moreira, & Carballo, 1999). It often does not accurately
t isotherms with multi-layer absorption due to their non-
sigmoidal shape. The GAB model gave a good t for more
than 50% of analysed fruits, meat and vegetables (Kaymak-
Ertekin & Gedik, 2004; Lomauro, Bakshi, & Labuza, 1985),
and the use of the GAB equation has been recommended by
the European COST 90 project. The Peleg (1993) model is a
4 parameter model that can be used for both sigmoidal and
non-sigmoidal shaped isotherms. The Kats and Kutarov
(1998) model is a 3 parameter extension of the GAB model
that allows the description of adsorption isotherms involv-
ing multi-layer as well as cluster formation. Chirife and Igle-
sias (1978) found that Oswin model was versatile for a wide
range of isotherms shapes and materials. A non-linear least
squares regression program was used to evaluate the model
parameters (SigmaPlot, 8.02). The criteria used to evaluate
the goodness-of-t of each equation were the mean relative
water activity
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
X
e
(
g
/
g
d
r
y
b
a
s
i
s
)
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
Ads Hot-air dried
Des Hot-air dried
water activity
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
X
e
(
g
/
g
d
r
y
b
a
s
i
s
)
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
Ads (3 bar)
Des (3 bar)
water activity
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
X
e
(
g
/
g
d
r
y
b
a
s
i
s
)
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
Ads (6bar)
Des (6bar)
Fig. 6. Sorption isotherms at 20C for (a) hot-air dried potato slices, (b)
texturized (3 bar) potato slices and (c) texturized (6 bar) potato slices.
184 T. Iguedjtal et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 85 (2008) 180190
percentage deviation modulus (E) and the root mean square
percent error (RMS).
E
100
N
bre
X
N
i1
jX
i
X
pi
j
X
i
6
RMS
1
N
bre
X
N
i1
X
i
X
pi
X
i
2
v
u
u
t
100 7
where, X
i
is the experimental moisture content, X
pi
is the
predicted moisture content, and N
bre
is number of experi-
mental data.
2.6. Surface area
The BET, GAB and Kats and Kutarov models all pro-
vide estimates of the mono-layer moisture content. The
surface area r (m
2
/g) was determined from the monolayer
moisture content, using (Mazza & Le Maguer, 1978):
r
A
H
2
O
N
Avogadro
X
0
M
H
2
O
3530X
0
8
where r is the solid surface area (m
2
g
1
), X
0
is the mono-
layer moisture content (g/g dry basis), M
H
2
O
is the molecu-
lar weight of water (18 g mol
1
), N
Avogadro
is Avogadros
number (6 10
23
molecules mol
1
), and A
H
2
O
is the area
of water molecule (1.06 10
19
m
2
).
2.7. Isosteric heat of sorption
The determination of the sorption isotherms at two or
more temperatures allows heat of sorption to be evaluated.
The net isotherm heat of sorption is the energy associated
with the sorption process greater than the heat of vaporiza-
tion (DH
vap
):
q
st
Q
st
DH
vap
9
where q
st
is the net isosteric heat of sorption (kJ mol
1
), Q
st
is the isosteric heat of sorption (kJ mol
1
) and DH
vap
is the
heat of vaporisation (kJ mol
1
).
The net isosteric heat of sorption can be calculated from
the slope of the sorption isotherms plotted as lna
w
versus
(1/T) for specic values of moisture content using the Clau-
siusClapeyron equation (Rizvi, 1995):
q
st
R
dln a
w
d1=T
10
where a
w
is the water activity, R is the universal gas
constant (kJ/mol K) and T is the absolute temperature
(K).
Table 2
Estimated sorption model constants for hot-air dried potato
Model Constants Adsorption Desorption
20 C 30 C 40 C 20 C 30 C 40 C
BET
a
X
0
(g/g db) 0.056 0.055 0.053 0.083 0.078 0.097
r (m
2
/g) 197.68 194.15 187.09 292.99 275.34 342.41
C 10.490 9.226 8.150 7.550 7.345 37.052
E (%) 3.93 4.56 4.77 5.16 5.16 2.50
RMS (%) 4.57 5.96 5.77 6.96 5.82 2.87
GAB X
0
0.064 0.070 0.073 0.106 0.101 0.076
r (m
2
/g) 225.92 247.10 257.69 374.18 356.74 268.28
C 7.330 6.380 5.480 7.010 6.736 7.830
K 0.946 0.876 0.807 0.760 0.750 0.795
E (%) 3.81 2.70 3.06 4.35 4.65 1.51
RMS (%) 4.34 3.71 3.54 5.65 5.71 1.85
Kats and Kutarov X
0
(g/g db) 0.059 0.058 0.056 0.083 0.078 0.060
r (m
2
/g) 208.27 204.74 197.68 292.99 275.34 211.8
C 8.415 7.980 6.910 7.840 7.540 9.399
N 9.590 6.600 5.190 4.310 4.150 4.760
E (%) 2.72 2.62 2.80 4.89 4.80 2.77
RMS (%) 3.30 3.23 2.98 6.55 5.44 3.47
Peleg K
1
0.128 0.135 0.130 0.241 0.225 0.159
K
2
0.367 0.241 0.162 0.399 0.327 0.163
N
1
0.592 0.650 0.684 0.775 0.783 0.681
N
2
4.260 3.890 3.460 9.180 9.030 4.650
E (%) 4.03 3.46 3.69 2.92 3.29 2.01
RMS (%) 5.23 5.08 4.51 4.04 4.95 2.56
Oswin A 0.108 0.103 0.094 0.135 0.125 0.103
B 0.609 0.548 0.514 0.465 0.461 0.468
E (%) 6.14 4.85 7.50 10.56 9.69 6.55
RMS (%) 7.02 7.31 13.18 16.65 14.5 11.65
a
a
w
range for BET equation was 0.10.5, only for rst ve data points were used.
T. Iguedjtal et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 85 (2008) 180190 185
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Adsorption and desorption isotherms
The adsorption and desorption isotherms of potato
slices hot-air dried and texturized at 20, 30 and 40 C
are shown in Figs. 35ab. As expected, the obtained
equilibrium moisture content values show an increase
with increasing water activity. The sigmo dal shape of
the isotherms is common for several hygroscopic products
and corresponds to type II of the Brunauers classication
(Brunauer, Deming, Deming, & Troller, 1940). This is in
agreement with other measured isotherms for potato
(Mazza, 1982; McMinn & Magee, 2003; Van den Berg
& Bruin, 1981).
The equilibrium moisture content decreased with the
increase of temperature for a constant water activity, thus
indicating that the potato slices become less hygroscopic.
Similar results were found by Litcheld and Okos (1992);
McLaughlin and Magee (1998) and Palipane and Driscoll
(1992). These trends may be due to the reduction in the
total number of the active sites for water binding as a result
of physical and/or chemical changes in the product caused
by the storage temperature (Mazza, 1980).
3.2. Moisture sorption hysteresis
Fig. 6ac shows the sorption isotherms obtained for hot-
air dried and texturized potato slices at 20 C. These curves
clearly display that hysteresis occurs for both hot-air dried
and texturized potato slices. The hysteresis dierence was
less for the 6 bar DIC than for the 3 bar DIC and hot air
dried (both lower dierence in equilibrium moisture con-
tent and smaller range of a
w
for which there was a dier-
ence). The reduced hysteresis suggests that the texturized
product have surfaces free from capillary forces.
3.3. Mathematical modelling
The estimated parameters of the models for hot-air
dried and texturized potatoes and E and RMS values for
models are listed in Tables 24. The tting of the BET
was restricted to data with a
w
< 0.5 because it could not
t the sigmo dal shape across the full range. Lower E
and RMS values represent improved goodness of t. The
Kats and Kutarov equation predicted the isotherms with
the smallest E and RMS (average E was 2.97% and average
RMS was 3.78% for all temperatures and both adsorption
and desorption). The Peleg model gave also closest t to
Table 3
Estimated sorption model constants for texturized potato (3 bar)
Model Constants Adsorption Desorption
20 C 30 C 40 C 20 C 30 C 40 C
BET
a
X
0
(g/g db) 0.065 0.063 0.062 0.083 0.082 0.070
r (m
2
/g) 229.45 222.40 218.86 292.99 289.46 247.10
C 13.490 10.800 10.920 10.660 8.631 11.791
E (%) 3.29 3.54 2.92 4.73 4.47 5.28
RMS (%) 3.47 4.06 3.26 6.46 6.64 6.98
GAB X
0
(g/g db) 0.080 0.083 0.087 0.105 0.108 0.083
r (m
2
/g) 282.40 293.00 307.11 370.65 381.24 292.99
C 8.980 6.720 6.910 5.230 7.410 10.230
K 0.892 0.843 0.778 0.783 0.741 0.822
E (%) 3.61 4.32 3.97 3.98 4.34 3.78
RMS (%) 4.68 5.30 5.38 5.41 6.97 5.63
Kats et Kutarov X
0
(g/g db) 0.069 0.067 0.067 0.084 0.083 0.068
r (m
2
/g) 283.57 236.51 236.51 296.52 292.99 240.04
C 11.180 10.850 8.620 10.710 8.450 12.340
N 6.940 5.360 4.670 4.480 4.070 5.107
E (%) 2.28 2.15 2.00 3.71 4.07 4.06
RMS (%) 2.76 2.69 2.36 5.59 5.89 6.21
Peleg K
1
0.143 0.138 0.136 0.229 0.225 0.183
K
2
0.307 0.237 0.170 0.258 0.179 0.238
N
1
0.527 0.570 0.573 0.673 0.717 0.630
N
2
3.580 3.170 2.770 6.051 5.498 5.300
E (%) 3.18 1.85 1.67 3.33 3.55 3.250
RMS (%) 3.94 3.25 2.53 4.25 5.58 4.64
Oswin A 0.128 0.118 0.113 0.144 0.135 0.123
B 0.525 0.516 0.470 0.445 0.445 0.459
E (%) 3.64 4.56 5.96 6.40 7.41 5.19
RMS (%) 4.28 6.28 9.13 9.87 11.43 7.47
a
a
w
range for BET equation was 0.10.5, only for rst ve data points were used.
186 T. Iguedjtal et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 85 (2008) 180190
the experimental data (average E and RMS of 2.90% and
3.85%), However, the GAB and BET models (restricted
a
w
range) were only slightly inferior with average values
for E and RMS of 3.45% and 4.66% for GAB.model and
4.03% and 4.88% for BET model. The Oswin equation pre-
dictions were signicantly poorer for both adsorption and
desorption, giving average values for E and RMS of 5.80%
and 8.68%. The GAB, Kats and Kutarov and BET
(restricted a
w
range) were close in accuracy. Similar results
were found for hot-air dried potatoes (Wang & Brennan,
1991). Overall, any of the Kats and Kutarov, GAB or Peleg
models were good predictors of the sorption isotherms.
3.4. Monolayer moisture contents and surface area
The value of the monolayer (X
0
) is of particular impor-
tance as it indicates the amount of water that is strongly
adsorbed to specic sites and is considered as the value at
which a food is the most stable. The estimated monolayer
moisture content values (X
0
) of sorption are shown in
Tables 24 for the, BET, GAB, or Kats and Kutarov mod-
els. The monolayer moisture content were lower for hot-air
dried samples than for texturized samples, The monolayer
moisture content values for hot-air dried potatoes are com-
parable to the values of 7.36 (g H
2
O/g dry basis) reported
for starchy food by Chirife and Iglesias (1978) and Yanni-
otis (1994). Wang and Brennan (1991) reported a mono-
layer moisture content value ranging from 3% to 6% for
potatoes in the temperature range 4070 C. The surface
Table 4
Estimated sorption model constants for texturized potato (6 bar)
Model Constants Adsorption Desorption
20 C 30 C 40 C 20 C 30 C 40 C
BET
a
X
0
(g/g db) 0.077 0.076 0.072 0.091 0.084 0.072
r (m
2
/g) 271.81 268.28 254.16 321.23 296.52 254.16
C 20.260 13.090 14.400 15.222 14.181 18.91
E (%) 3.62 3.90 3.13 5.26 3.25 3.20
RMS (%) 3.70 4.28 3.35 6.45 3.76 3.55
GAB X
0
(g/g db) 0.093 0.108 0.098 0.115 0.109 0.094
r (m
2
/g) 328.290 381.240 345.940 405.91 384.77 331.82
C 14.270 9.024 9.960 12.900 11.150 13.490
K 0.851 0.754 0.742 0.774 0.759 0.756
E (%) 2.23 2.42 2.61 4.14 3.482 3.27
RMS (%) 3.01 3.06 4.04 5.97 5.30 4.48
Kats et Kutarov X
0
0.079 0.085 0.077 0.092 0.087 0.076
r (m
2
/g) 278.87 300.05 271.81 324.76 307.11 268.28
C 17.980 10.650 11.680 14.980 13.070 16.050
N 5.610 4.200 4.050 4.268 4.160 4.110
E (%) 1.85 1.27 1.62 4.318 2.82 2.79
RMS (%) 2.27 1.52 1.84 5.57 3.48 3.02
Peleg K
1
0.172 0.192 0.167 0.240 0.207 0.159
K
2
0.278 0.172 0.147 0.283 0.178 0.157
N
1
0.470 0.579 0.546 0.595 0.568 0.476
N
2
3.590 3.120 2.910 6.170 3.720 2.890
E (%) 1.85 3.38 2.74 3.28 2.28 2.50
RMS (%) 2.15 3.58 2.87 4.70 2.83 2.75
Oswin A 0.149 0.144 0.130 0.160 0.150 0.134
B 0.452 0.432 0.416 0.409 0.414 0.396
E (%) 2.44 5.68 5.17 4.38 4.35 4.01
RMS (%) 3.03 9.67 7.95 6.24 5.64 4.95
a
a
w
range for BET equation was 0.10.5, only for rst ve data points were used.
water activity
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
X
e
(
g
/
g
d
r
y
b
a
s
i
s
)
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
Hot-air dried
3 bar
6 bar
Fig. 7. Eect of the DIC treatment on adsorption isotherms of potato
slices at 20 C.
T. Iguedjtal et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 85 (2008) 180190 187
area values are shown also in Table 24. The average sur-
face area values for adsorption and desorption for all tem-
peratures using the GAB model, were (243.5, 332.7 m
2
/g)
for hot-air dried products, (294.2, 348.3 m
2
/g) for the tex-
turized products at 3 bar and (351.8, 374.2 m
2
/g) for textur-
ized products at 6 bar. These results indicate an increase in
the available surface for the hydrophilic water binding dur-
ing the treatment of potato slices by DIC and this is prob-
ably due to the existence of a microporous structure in
these products generated by the treatment.
3.5. Eect of DIC treatment
The comparisons of sorption isotherms at 20 C for the
three treatments are represented in Fig. 7.
The treatment of potatoes signicantly aects the shape
of the adsorption isotherm. For high relative humidities,
the dierence decreased. Texturized potatoes at 3 and
6 bar adsorb more vapour water compared to hot-air dried
potatoes over the entire water activity range. The high val-
ues of adsorption for treated potatoes were probably due
to the porous structure of this product (Fig. 8ac). Mazza
(1982) reported similar results when comparing adsorption
isotherm of freeze-dried and vacuum dried potatoes. Fur-
thermore, the water activity decreases with the intensity
of the DIC treatment at constant moisture content
(Fig. 7). For X
0
equal to 0.1 g/g dry basis, water activity
is equal to 0.49, 0.39 and 0.28, for hot-air dried and textur-
ized potatoes at 3 and 6 bar, respectively. Thus, DIC trea-
ted products are likely to be more stable than hot-air dried
products at the same moisture content.
3.6. Net isosteric heat of sorption
The variation in heat of adsorption with moisture con-
tent, for hot air-dried and texturized products at 3 and
6 bar is shown in Fig. 9.
The isosteric heat of adsorption had a strong depen-
dence on moisture content, with the energy required for
sorption increasing for low moisture content. This reects
the dierence in water binding forces. Initially at low mois-
ture content water occupies highly active polar sites on the
surface (with high interaction energy), followed by a pro-
gressive lling of the less available sites with lower bonding
activation (Tsami, Maroulis, Marinos-Karinos, & Sarava-
cos, 1990). Furthermore, the isosteric heat of adsorption
Fig. 8. Micrographs comparing (a) hot-air dried, (b) texturized (3 bar)
and (c) texturized (6 bar) potato slices (50 times magnication).
X
e
(g/g dry basis)
0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25
q
s
t
(
k
J
/
m
o
l
)
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
6 bar
3 bar
Hot-air dried
Fig. 9. Change of sorption isosteric heat with moisture content for hot-air
dried and DIC potatoes at 3 and 6 bar.
188 T. Iguedjtal et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 85 (2008) 180190
decreases with an increase in material moisture content and
tends to that of pure water indicating that the water is
becoming more freely available as moisture content
increases.
Comparison of hot-dried and treated potatoes data
shows that, at a specic moisture content, the isosteric heat
of adsorption of texturized potatoes is higher than the cor-
responding hot-dried value. This increase is probably due
to the appearance of new highly energetic polar bonding
sites after texturizing the potatoes.
4. Conclusion
The moisture sorption isotherms of the Bintje potato
variety were characteristic of the type II isotherm for both
hot-air dried and texturized samples. The equilibrium
moisture content decreased with the increase of tempera-
ture at constant water activity. The hysteresis was lower
for texturized potatoes than for hot air-dried potatoes.
The Peleg, GAB, and Kats and Kutarov models gave ade-
quate ts to the sorption data in the temperatures range of
2040 C and relative humidities range of 590%. The
monolayer moisture contents for texturized potatoes at 3
and 6 bar were higher than hot-air dried samples. The
water activity decreased with the severity of the DIC treat-
ment at constant moisture content implying greater storage
stability The net isosteric heat of sorption of texturized
potatoes were greater than that of hot-air dried potatoes
at low moisture contents, probably due to the appearance
of new highly energetic polar sites after texturizing.
Acknowledgement
The authors wish to thank the CDA (Communaute
dAgglomeration de La Rochelle) for their nancial
support.
References
Adam, M., & Suchy, J. (1969). Teplotni a tlakove pomery pri expanznim
suseni. Promsyl Potravin, 20, 203207.
Aguilera, J. M. (2005). Why food microstructure? Journal of Food
Engineering, 67, 311.
Allaf, K., Louka, N., Bouvier, J. M., Parent, F., & Forget, M. (1992).
Denition dun nouveau procede de traitement thermo-mecanique par
detente instantanee contro lee TTMDIC. French Patent No. 92 04940.
Allaf, K., Louka, N., Bouvier, J. M., Parent, F., & Forget, M. (1993).
Procede de traitement de produits biologiques en vue de la modica-
tion de leur texture, installations pour la mise en uvre dun tel
procede et produits ainsi realises. French Patent No. 93 09720.
International extension No. PCT/FR94/00975.
Al-Muhtaseb, A. H., McMinn, W. A. M., & Magee, T. R. A. (2004).
Water sorption isotherms of starch powders: Part 1: Mathematical
description of experimental data. Journal of Food Engineering, 61,
297307.
AOAC (1980). Ocial methods of analysis. Washington, DC: Association
of Ocial Analytical Chemists Inc.
Arslan, N., & Togrul, H. (2005). Modelling of water sorption isotherms of
macaroni stored in a chamber under controlled humidity and
thermodynamic approach. Journal of Food Engineering, 69, 133145.
Aviara, N. A., & Ajibola, O. O. (2002). Thermodynamics of moisture
sorption of melon seed and cassava. Journal of Food Engineering, 55,
107113.
Boquet, R., Chirife, J., & Iglesias, H. A. (1978). Equations for tting water
sorption isotherms of foods. III. Evaluation of various three parameter
models. Journal of Food Technology, 14, 527534.
Brunauer, S., Deming, L. S., Deming, W. E., & Troller, E. (1940). On the
theory of the Van Der Waals adsorption of gas. Journal of American
Chemical Society, 62, 17231732.
Brunauer, S., Emmett, P. H., & Teller, E. (1938). Adsorption of gases in
multimolecular layers. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 60,
309319.
Chen, C. (2002). PHPastharvest technology: Sorption isotherms of
sweet potato slices. Biosystems Engineering, 83, 8595.
Chirife, J., & Iglesias, H. A. (1978). Equations for tting water sorption
isotherms of food: Part I. Journal of Food Technology, 13, 159174.
Craig, J. C., & Sullivan, J. F. (1980). Explosion pung a new food drying
concept. In 3rd International Symposium Papers, pp. 281287.
De La Burde, R. Z., Aument, P. E., & Utsch, F. V. (1981). Novel tobacco
product and improved for the expansion of tobacco. U.S. Patent
4,258,729.
Delost-Lewis, K., Lorenz, K., & Tribelhorn, R. (1992). Pung quality of
experimental varieties of proso millets (Panicum miliaceum). Cereal
Chemistry, 69, 359365.
Durakova, A. G., & Menkov, N. D. (2004). Moisture sorption charac-
teristics of chickpea our. Journal of Food Engineering, 68, 535539.
Harrington, W. O., & Griths, F. P. (1950). Pus potatoes. Food Industry,
22, 1872.
Heiland, W. K., & Eskew, R. K. (1965). A new gun for explosive pung of
fruits and vegetables. US Agr. Res. Serv., pp. 7347.
Igbeka, J. C., Blaisdell, J. L., Herum, F. L., Hamdy, M. Y. (1975).
Equilibrium moisture content of cassava and potato. American Society
of Agricultural Engineers, Paper No. 75-6527.
Kats, B. M., & Kutarov, V. V. (1998). A modied BET equation for
polylayer adsorption. Adsorption Science Technology, 16, 257262.
Katz, E. E., & Labuza, T. P. (1981). Eect of water activity on sensory
crispness and mechanical deformation of snack food products. Journal
of food science, 50, 385391.
Kaymak-Ertekin, F., & Gedik, A. (2004). Sorption isotherms and isosteric
heat of sorption for grapes, apricots, apples and potatoes. Lebensmit-
tel-Wissenschaft und technologie, 37, 429438.
Labuza, T. P., & Hymann, C. R. (1998). Moisture migration and control
in multi-domain foods. Food Science and technology, 9, 4755.
Lasekan, O. O., & Lasekan, W. O. (2000). Moisture sorption and the
degree of starch polymer degradation on ours of popped and malted
sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Journal of Cereal Science, 31, 5561.
Litcheld, J. B., & Okos, M. R. (1992). Moisture diusivity in pasta
during drying. Journal of Food Engineering, 17, 117142.
Lomauro, C. J., Bakshi, A. S., & Labuza, T. P. (1985). Evaluation of food
moisture sorption isotherm equations, Part I: Fruit, vegetable and
meat products. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft und technologie, 18,
111117.
Louka, N., & Allaf, K. (2002). New process for texturizing partially
dehydrated biological products using controlled sudden decompres-
sion to the vacuum: Application on potatoes. Journal of Food Science,
67, 30333038.
Louka, N., Juhel, F., & Allaf, K. (2004a). Quality studies on various types
of partially dried vegetables texturized by controlled sudden decom-
pression: General patterns for the variation of the expansion ratio.
Journal of Food Engineering, 65, 245253.
Mazza, G. (1980). Thermodynamic considerations of water vapour
sorption by horseradish roots. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft und Tech-
nologie, 13, 1317.
Mazza, G. (1982). Moisture sorption isotherms of potato slices. Journal of
Food Technology, 17, 4754.
Mazza, G., & Le Maguer, M. (1978). Water sorption properties of yellow
globe onion (Allium cepa L.). Canadian Institute of Food Science and
Technology Journal, 33, 189193.
T. Iguedjtal et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 85 (2008) 180190 189
McLaughlin, C. P., & Magee, T. R. A. (1998). The determination of
sorption isotherm and the isosteric heats of sorption for potatoes.
Journal of Food Engineering, 35, 267280.
McMinn, W. A. M., &Magee, T. R. A. (2003). Thermodynamics properties
of moisture sorptionof potato. Journal of FoodEngineering, 60, 157165.
Mulet, A., Garcia-Pascual, P., Sanjuan, R., & Garcia-Reverter, J. (2002).
Equilibrium isotherm and isosteric heats of morel. Journal of Food
Engineering, 53, 7581.
Oswin, C. R. (1946). The kinetics of package life. The isotherm. Journal of
Chemical Industry, 65, 419421.
Palipane, K. B., & Driscoll, R. H. (1992). Moisture sorption characteristics
of inshell macadamia nuts. Journal of Food Engineering, 18, 6376.
Peleg, M. (1993). Assessment of a semi empirical four parameter general
model for sigmoid moisture sorption isotherms. Journal of food
Process Engineering, 16, 2137.
Rizvi, S. S. H. (1995). Thermodynamic properties of food in dehydration.
In M. A. Rao & S. S. H. Rizvi (Eds.), Engineering properties of foods
(pp. 223309). New york: Marcel Dekker.
Sullivan, J. F., & Craig, J. C. (1984). The development of explosion-
pung. Food Technology, 2, 5255.
Tolaba, M. P., Peltzer, M., Enriquez, N., & Pollio, M. L. (2004). Grain
sorption equilibria of quinoa grains. Journal of Food Engineering, 61,
365371.
Tsami, E., Maroulis, Z. B., Marinos-Karinos, D., & Saravacos, G. D.
(1990). Heat sorption of water in dried fruits. International Journal of
Food Science and Technology, 25, 350359.
Turkot, V. A., Eskew, R. K., Sullivan, J. F., Cording, Jr. J., & Heiland, W.
K. (1965). Explosion pued dehydrated carrots. III. Estimated cost of
commercial production using shortened cycle. U.S. Agr. Res. Serv., pp.
73122.
Van den Berg, C., & Bruin, S. (1981). Water activity and its
estimation in food systems. In L. B. Rockland & F. Stewart
(Eds.), Water activity: Inuence on food quality (pp. 147177).
New york: Academic Press.
Vazquez, G., Chenlo, F., Moreira, R., & Carballo, L. (1999). Desorption
isotherms of muscatel and aledo grapes, and the inuence of pretreat-
ments on muscatel isotherms. Journal of Food Engineering, 39, 409
414.
Vullioud, M., Marquez, C. A., & De Michelis, A. (2004). Desorption
isotherms for sweet and sour cherry. Journal of Food Engineering, 63,
1519.
Wang, N., & Brennan, J. B. (1991). Moisture sorption isotherm
characteristics of potatoes at four temperatures. Journal of Food
Engineering, 14, 269287.
Yanniotis, S. (1994). A new method for interpolating and extrapolating
water activity data. Journal of Food Engineering, 21, 8196.
190 T. Iguedjtal et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 85 (2008) 180190