Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 5

Rafi Rotem Israeli Tax Authority whistleblower

http://www.scribd.com/Rafi_Rotem
2014-05-22 Israeli Supreme Court refuses to serve a signed, certified
decisions on persecuted whistleblower Rafi Rotem
" !"$%&'$%%$(&")&%(*$%'&%+!%$%!%$($%,*("+-!"*'!.
$%'/'
] 0*"*$'1 [
Service of simulated court records is a well-known fraud methods in the courts for
hundreds of years. In the Israeli Supreme Court it has een a routine since 2002. If the
!e"as #enal Code were enforced in Israel$ for e"ample$ all %ustices of the Israeli Supreme
Court would have een considered repeat offender$ and sentenced to %ail.
] pics [

#residin& 'ustice (sher )runis$ 'ustices *dmond +evy$ *dna (rel$ ,-i .o&elman
////
01ccupy!+.$ 2ay 22 - Israeli !a" (uthority whistle lower has sent to Israeli Supreme Court
#residin& 'ustice (sher )runis a second re3uest for the service of si&ned and certified copies of
decisions in his petition. 415 ( previous re3uest$ sent a month a&o$ remain unanswered. 41a5 (s has
een the case in the Israeli Supreme Court since 2002$ the Court served on 6otem only decisions
that were unsi&ned y the 'ustices$ uncertified y the Chief Clerk$ earin& the disclaimer 7su%ect
ot editin& and phrasin& chan&es7$ and with no accompanyin& letter 8authentication9.
6afi 6otem e"posed systemic corruption in the Israel !a" (uthority$ involvin& hu&e ta" waivers to
tycoon and crime family related usinesses$ alle&ed murder of a ta" fraud 7source7$ and se" ries
to a ta" authority officer. !he Israeli %ustice system has persistently refused to investi&ate 6otem:s
alle&ations$ and the courts and State 1mudsman have refused to accord him e3ual protection
under the law over the past 12 years. 1ver the same period$ 6otem has suffered continuous
harassment and retaliation. 425
!he #etition to the ;i&h Court of 'ustice Rotem v Samet et al 812<<=0>9 a&ain sou&ht protection
and investi&ation of his alle&ations. 6otem further claimed ostruction of %ustice in conduct of
'ud&e .ardah Samet in the !el (viv +aor Court in his case. ;owever$ the #etition was summarily
dismissed y 'ustices *dmond +evy$ (li-ah (rel and ,-i .o&elman. 4<5
In their 2arch <$ 200> 'ud&ment$ the 'ustices of the ;i&h Court of 'ustice ruled that the matter
ori&inated in a lon&-term laor dispute in the !a" (uthority$ and that there was no foundation for
6otem:s claim of retaliation for his whistlelowin&. 4<5
( 201< review of the 6afi 6otem scandal y senior Israeli %ournalist Calman +ieeskind was titled$
7!here are no %ustices in 'erusalem7. 445
In an interview in 201<$ former Israeli (ttorney )eneral 2anny 2e-ou- stated$ re&ardin& the !a"
(uthority scandal$ e"posed y 6afi 6otem$ 7the worst corruption scandal is the on in the !a"
(uthority... it is the closest to or&ani-ed crime... the punishment of those involved did not reflect the
severity of their crimes and the entire affair...7 455
(s detailed in a secret State ?epartment cale from 200@$ pulished y Aikileaks$ the ,S
*massy in Israel also raised concerns re&ardin& the inte&ration of or&ani-ed crime and
&overnment in the State of Israel. 4B5
!he reason for today:s re3uest for the service of si&ned and certified decisions in 6otem:s #etition$
stems from the fact that the decisions were served unsi&ned y the %ud&es$ uncertified y the chief
clerk of the court$ earin& the disclaimer 7su%ect to editin& and phrasin& chan&es7$ and with no
accompanyin& letter 8authentication9.
Such records cannot e deemed y a reasonale person valid court records. Such records are
simulated 8luff9 court records. Israeli law does not e"plicitly defined simulated court records. Cut
many other %urisdictions do. !he definition in the !e"as #enal Code is enclose as an e"ample. 4Ba5
!he service of unsi&ned$ uncertified %udicial decisions is a well reco&ni-ed method of conducin&
fraud in the courts for hundreds of years.
!he Israeli Supreme Court has een routinely servin& its decisions in such manner since 2002$
startin& under the tenure of then #residin& 'ustice (haron Carak. ;ad the !e"as #enal Code een
in effect and force in Israel$ all Israeli Supreme Court %ustices would have een deemed repeat
offenders$ and should have een sentenced to %ail terms.
!he ;uman 6i&hts (lert 8D)19 sumission to the ,D ;uman 6i&hts Council documented that the
Israeli Supreme Court routinely conducts simulated proceedin&s$ issues simulated %udicial records$
and refuses to issue duly si&ned and certified decision records. 4E->5 Simulated %udicial records are
records that are not deemed valid and effectual records$ pursuant to the law of the State of Israel$
ut which the courts defrauds the people to elieve are true and valid court records.
It remains to e seen how #residin& 'ustice (sher )runis would respond on 6afi 6otem:s re3uest
for duly si&ned and certified decision records in this landmark affair.
!he ;uman 6i&hts (lert sumission was reviewed y the professional staff of the ;uman 6i&hts
Council$ and was incorporated into the 201< ,D:s periodic report on ;uman 6i&hts in Israel with
the note$ 7lack of inte&rity in the... Supreme Court... in Israel7. 4@5
!he ;uman 6i&hts (lert sumission proposed that the solution to corruption of the Israeli courts$
includin& the Supreme Court$ should include a 7!ruth and 6econciliation Commission7. Such
commissions were previously employed in other nations$ like South (frica and *ast )ermany$
which emer&ed from under tyrannical re&imes.
(s is the case in other nations$ corruption of the %ud&es is central to the current socio-economic
crisis in Israel.
////
'oseph Fernik$ #h?
;uman 6i&hts (lert 8D)19
1ccupy!+.
////
G !he ;uman 6i&hts (lert 8D)19 sumission to the ;uman 6i&hts Council of the ,nited Dations
was incorporated into the 2010 #eriodic 6eview 6eport re&ardin& ;uman 6i&hts in the ,nited
States$ with the noteH 7corruption of the courts and the le&al profession and discrimination y law
enforcement in California7.
G !he ;uman 6i&hts (lert 8D)19 sumission to the ;uman 6i&hts Council of the ,nited Dations
was incorporated into the 201< #eriodic 6eview 6eport re&ardin& ;uman 6i&hts in Israel$ with the
noteH 7lack of inte&rity of the electronic records of the Supreme Court$ the district courts and the
detainees courts in Israel.7
I+IDJSI
415 2014-05-21 LMNOPNQNRSTRUVRWXTWYZ[NL\LMO]NZWUV^_MPVRZXOZM[WQRNLZ_LWMRLMNSVMTX
\XXRN^WSVVWM 7 SON^POY[QRNL` $: \X 7 ` 9 12<<=0> 9
6otem:s repeat re3uest for si&ned and certified copies of decisions in ;i&h Court of 'ustice #etition
812<<=0>9 8full *n&lish translation9
httpH==www.scrid.com=doc=2255>BE2E=
41a5 2014-04-2< WMLMNOPNQNRSTRUVRWXTWYZ[NL\LMO]NZWUV^_MPVRZXOZM[WQRNLZ_LRMTX
\XXRN^WSVV 7 SON^POY[QRNL` $: \X 7 ` 9 12<<=0> 9 == 6otem:s re3uest for si&ned and certified copies
of decisions in ;i&h Court of 'ustice #etition 812<<=0>9
httpH==www.scrid.com=doc=2202<0B04=
425 0000-00-00 QRNLZ_L - ]PaVLZb
== 6afi 6otem - !imeline$ with full *n&lish translation
httpH==www.scrid.com=doc=21@114<>B=
4<5 200>-04-0> SON^POY[QRNL $: \X 7 ` 9 12<<=0> -8 ZNWc[NPcO^_NMVR^WSVNQZ[NNTPQZXRd
6otem v Samet et al 812<<=0>9 petition in the ;i&h Court of 'ustice e 1nline 6ecords and 'ustice
*dmond +evy 'ud&ment and ?ecision
httpH==www.scrid.com=doc=21>E@5>01
445 201<-10-04 QZWMNLZXQZ^_NM]ZO / XZLUP
Do %ud&es in 'erusalem/2aariv
httpH==www.scrid.com=doc=21>><1@2B=
455 201<-0B-0E MPUNZVQU]NZOL 7 aNaPZ[PP / `LOV
Interview with former (ttorney )eneral 2anny 2e-ou-/;aaret-
httpH==www.scrid.com=doc=21>>0>14E=
4B5 .iewin& cale 0@!*+(.I.10@>$ IS6(*+H ( #612IS*? +(D? f16 16)(DIF*? C6I2*g
httpH==wikileaks.or&=cale=200@=05=0@!*+(.I.10@>.html
4Ba5 !e"as #enal Code - Section <2.4>. Simulatin& +e&al #rocess
h <2.4>. SI2,+(!ID) +*)(+ #61C*SS.
8a9 ( person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to e delivered to
another any document that simulates a summons$ complaint$ %ud&ment$ or other court process with
the intent toH
819 induce payment of a claim from another personi or
829 cause another toH
8(9 sumit to the putative authority of the documenti or
8C9 take any action or refrain from takin& any action in response to the document$ in
compliance with the document$ or on the asis of the document.
89 #roof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it e forwarded to the
intended recipient is a sufficient showin& that the document was delivered.
8c9 It is not a defense to prosecution under this section that the simulatin& documentH
819 states that it is not le&al processi or
829 purports to have een issued or authori-ed y a person or entity who did not have lawful
authority to issue or authori-e the document.
8d9 If it is shown on the trial of an offense under this section that the simulatin& document was
filed with$ presented to$ or delivered to a clerk of a court or an employee of a clerk of a
court created or estalished under the constitution or laws of this state$ there is a reuttale
presumption that the document was delivered with the intent descried y Susection 8a9.
8e9 *"cept as provided y Susection 8f9$ an offense under this section is a Class (
misdemeanor.
8f9 If it is shown on the trial of an offense under this section that the defendant has previously
een convicted of a violation of this section$ the offense is a state %ail felony.
(dded y (cts 1@@E$ E5th +e&.$ ch. 1>@$ h <$ eff. 2ay 21$ 1@@E.
]ZURZOLPWQZdZWV]ZZ[UWYYT^PTNSVWMZLXUQN\LR 9 ]WVWLNTPV
YYT^WMZWZW_VcNTV - jZUY <2.4> H ]ZURZOLPWQZdZWV
h <2.4> ]ZURZOLPWQZdZWV
8 O 8 V[PaVVTSPVkPYPWMLSOWNRLZYPWQLN\RNLZVaLYNSkNRPQcONRNOQORZWZW_VLZXUUbXPQcO
^_MPVRZXW $ VUZXRXRd $ ]ZcTY_ $ LSO]ZcRZXZXRdWdNO $ WV[NNdX 9H 1 8 ZcZWUVMZLcWMQNWMRWQNL\W
LSOV $ NO
829 LSOWQL\WH
(9 kPYPNRNOWMVLNOdWRNdPYWUPMZVW i NO
C9 NWQORVXNkPYPWVXN\RXZVMWdVWNU_^NT[WPU[PZVWNOVWNU_^NT[W $ VakPYPYZYXWUNO .
8 X 8 LYP[kPYPVMRNOLVWRT_YPVWZUONVNcNUZZWUZ\ZMV[NNdkNRPNVMWdQcOWkPYPVWMVObPVLNMZO .
8 \ 8 VajZUYRSRRZWZW_VUZXRZ[_PV[\VROa]ZO $ ]ZURZOLPWkPYPVQO H
819 jTNRLX]ZcRZXkPYPN[ZOMLPNO.
829 Va\NYPkPYPLMOWNOTZ_[VWRZTNSRNdPYQVW]ZOMRNMZNOQcOZcZWULMNONOT_[NV.
8 c 8 VajZUYZ_WU^_MPXRNZOLNOXNVQO $ QNMZLWM\NV]ZURZOLPWkPYPVM $ \bNVNO $ RZXLZdaPWLYP[NO
^_MPV $ ^_MPVRZXRNLZdaPcXNUWNO $ ROaV[ZcPWMTNSVNVTNSVZ_WUcYN[NOcPUNVM $ VS[VkdXMZ $
jZUYXVLPO[MV[NNdVkNRPLYP[kPYPVMVdL_VWR[RZ[V 9 O 8 WZUW .
8 V 8 jZUYXLPO[MVPcXWP 9 N $8 VajZUYRSRVLZXU $ OZV \NYPVLZXU Class ( misdemeanor.
8 N 8 VajZUYZ_WU^_MPXRNZOLNOXNVQO $ VajZUYZ_WUVLZXUWULXUXUMLNVQMO[VM $ \NYPOZVVLZXUV
state %ail felony 8LYOPN[ZcMUM_9.
4E5 LbNTPSNc 9 ZLXUQN\LR 8 NOVSNcPTWSdWXTRVMQcOVRNZNdaW\ZZYWM 7 WOLMZXQcOVRNZNdaZX\WQ -
201<
httpH==www.scrid.com=doc=114254105=
4>5 !he ;uman 6i&hts (lert 8D)19 sumission 8201<9 for the ,niversal #eriodic 6eview of Israel
y the ,D ;uman 6i&hts Council$ as it appears on the ,D we site
LbNTPSNc 9 ZW\[OLNTP 8 NOVLROXUZ_NPONVMZ_d 7 Q 8 NOVSNcPTWSdWXTRVMQcOVRNZNdaW\ZZYWM 7 ZX\WQ
WOLMZXQcOVRNZNda 9 201<
httpH==li.ohchr.or&=;6Codies=,#6=?ocuments=Session15=I+=;6(/,#6/IS6/S15/2012/;uman6i
&hts(lert/*.pdf
4@5 1<-01-01 !he ;uman 6i&hts (lert 8D)19 sumission$ as incorporated into the ,D ;uman
6It&hts Council ,#6 reprort with the note 7+ack of inte&rity in the electronic records of the
Supreme Court$ the district courts and the detainees courts in Israel7 8pa&e 4$ para&raph 259
NOVWMQcOVRNZNdaRbUNPSNcXWWd[QcOVRNZNdaW\ZZYSNc 7 Q 9 201< 8 VLUVVRZZNNWX 7 QZXRdXVLMNZLYNS
]NZWUV^_MPVRZXWMQZZ[NL^TWOV $ QZZaNSPV^_MPVZRX $ WOLMZXRLNPMPZTaSNPW]ZcVZRXN 9 7 PU : 4 $ VTY_
259H
httpH==daccess-dds-ny.un.or&=doc=,D?1C=)*D=)12=1>0=12=#?f=)121>012.pdfg1pen*lement
7 !"$%&'$%%$(&")&%(*$%'&%+!%$%!%$($%,*("+-!"*'!.
$%'/'
ZXRdRObPV QZ[MRNOPVaP^_MPVZRXWMRLdNPVO[NVR^ZMOZV]ZURZOLPW]ZcRZX . RZXX
aOPVL\MROa]NZWUV^_MPV 2002 . YYT^WMZWZW_VTNSVQO $ VP\NcW $ WOLMZXjdO[NWSNPVZV $ Wd
LYOPQ[ZcMQZcUNPQZ[ZZLXUWQZXMS[NZV]NZWUV^_MPVRZXZ^_NM .
] RN[NPR [
WZUW
Y[NL\LMO]NZWUV^_MPVRZXOZM[ , ZNWc[NPcOQZ^_NMVN , WXLOV[cU , ]PW\N_ZaNU .
____
VOSPVWVOP $ R 7 O $ 22 ZOPW - QRNLZ_L $ QZYZPVRNMLXRNZNRZSMVjMNS $ RZXOZM[WRLaNSVMTXQNZVSWM
NRLZRUXRN^WSVVWM]ZcdQZLMNOPNQZPNRSQZTRUVRObPVWYZ[NL\LMO]NZWUV^_MPV 5 . 1 4 RPcNTVMTX $
McNSZ[_WVSWM[M $ VXN\RWdW]ZZcUVRdaOW 5 . 1a 4 aOPXbPVMZ_d 2002 $ \X 7 RN^WSVTLQRNLWOZbPV`
]NZWUV^_MPVRZXZ^_NMZcZWURNPNRS][ZOM $ ZMOLLZdaPZcZWURNLMNOP][ZOM $ LN^_RZZ[RRNOMN[V 7 jN_d
SYN[NVdZLUZZN[ZMW $7 QZNNWPQZXRdPOWWN 9 VZbTZ^[^NO .8
QZYZPVRNMLXRZR^ZMRNRZSMjMSQRNL $ UM_RNS_MPWQZLNMTVQZTYUNQZ[NTZZ^WRNZT[UYPRNWTV]RPN $
WMSbL 7 LNTP $7 QZYZPVRNMLXLTNSWZ[ZPcSNMN . RO]ONWPXLNTSWZ[TU]_NOXVXLYWOLMZXTcbVRdLUP
QRNLWMNZRN[U^ $ kMPXTNSVRSRVNNMV[\VNWTZ[UVWNXLYV[ZcPVLTXPN^_MPVZRXN 12 QZ[MV
RN[NLSOV . V_NTRVRNOkMPX $ RdMPRPRN[PT[NRNcL^VPQRNLWXY 5 . 2 4
\XWVLZRUX 7 ` - SON^POY[QRNL 9 : 12<<=0> 8 NZRN[U^WMVLZTSNV[\V\ZMVWXNMQRNLVYZ[ . Q\ROaVLZRUX
^POYVcLNVcNXUW]ZcVRZXR^_NMZcZWU^_MPZdZWVMNXZMWQRNL]U^ $ RVcNXUW]ZcVRZXXN[ZZ[UXV[cM 7 O .
ZNWc[NPcOQZ^_NMVZcZWUjYVWUVRSc[VLZRUVQWNO $ WXLOVaZWU $ ]PW\N_ZaNUN 5 . < 4
VQNZP]ZcTY_X - < `LPW $ 200> $ PUXN[]ZZ[UVM]NZWUV^_MPVRZXZ^_NMNTY_ 7 RNMLXVLNdUQZYSZRdLUP
QZYZPV $7 NObPkO 7 NR[U^WcNYZ]ZOZd 7 Zd RNRZSMVR_ZMSPVUX[Nc\[RN[PT[V . 5 < 4
R[MXc[ZTYXZW]PWTLZdXVZO[NRZUVWMVXRd 201< $ QZ[MLMUVWROWPXQRNLZ_LRML_RORLTNYV $
RLRNdVRSRVUZ_NV 7 QZWMNLZXQZ^_NM]ZO 5 .7 4 4
R[MX]NZOLX 201< $ QZYZPVRNMLXRNRZSMVRML_ZX\WLPNOaNaPZ[PLXUMWVWMPPWZ^_MPV`UNZV $
QRNLZ_LZcZWUV_MS[M $ ...7 QZYZPVRNMLRML_OZVLRNZXVLNPSVRNRZSMVRML_ ... LRNZXXNLTVLXcVVa
R[\LNOPVUZM_WM\NYW ... QZMUPVRLPNSROZNOL]_NOXR_TMPOW]dOROaVML_XQZUMLNPVWMVMZ[UV
VRNWWdXVML_VN 5 .7 5 4
VLOWMV[ZcPVRTWSPWMRZcNYRLNMTRXjMS[MZ_d 7 R[MPX 200@ $ YTZWZTZNZcZWUVPYLN_M $ RNLZL\M
VLO 7 WOLMZR[ZcPXWMPPVNR[\LNOPVVUZM_V\NaZPZX\WRNMMSVRWUVOZVQ\XZXOWRXX 5 . B 4
YZ[NL\LMO]NZWUV^_MPVRZXOZM[WQNZVVSWM[MVMTXWVXZYV $ RNLMNOPNRNPNRSRN^WSVWMVObPVW
]Zcd $ QZ^_NMVZcZWURNPNRS][ZOMdNLYP[N[ZZ[UXRN^WSVVMOZV $ ZMOLLZdaPZcZWURNLMNOP][ZO $ ]VMd
LN^_RZZ[RRNOMN[ 7 SYN[NVdZLUZZN[ZMWjN_d $7 QZNNWPQZXRdPOWWN 9 VZbTZ^[^NO .8
RUcLXQcOZcZWUjTNRZ[X]ZcRZXZXRddNXMSZZOWVWO]ZUPQZXRd . ]ZcRZXZXRdWQZXMS[VWO]ZUPQZXRd
]ZURZOLPW 9 RZM\\RZLXUX - jNWXOLMZ .8 ]ZURZOLPW]ZcRZXZXRdMNLZ_XLZc\PN[ZOWOLMZXTNSV . QWNO
RZWZW_VLXUVWO]ZUPQZXRdRObPVLZc\PRNLSORNXLRN[ZcPXTNSV . YYT^WMZWZW_VTNSV]PVLc\VV
R_LNbP 5 . Ba 4 ^_MPVZRXXVO[NVWMQZ[MRNOPVaPRLdNPV^ZMOZV]ZURZOLPW]ZcRZXZXRdRObPV .
]NZWUV^_MPVRZX XZRL\ZM]_NOXROaVLNbXNZRN^WSVROOZbPVWWSV - 2002 $ TLX]LVOWMNR[NVdRSR
]NZWUV^_MPVRZXOZM[d . WOLMZXjdO[NWSNPVZVYYT^WMTNSVQO $ aOP]NZWUV^_MPVRZXZ^_NMWdZaO
2002 LYOPQ[ZcMQZcUNPQZ[ZZLXUWQZXMS[NZV .
Nc 7 WMS 7 QcOVRNZNdaW\ZZY 9 7 D)1 8 NOVWMQcOVRNZNdaRbUNPW 7 ]NZWUV^_MPVRZXMVcXNUVROcUZRQ
VL\ZMXM]ZZ[Ud]ZURZOLPW]ZcRZXZXRdTZ_[PN]ZURZOLPWQZdZWVWV[P $ RNPNRSRN^WSVOZbPVWXLYPN
]ZcdRNLMNOPN 5 . E-> 4 jTNRZ[XQZXRdd^_MPVZRXZcZWUQZXMS[Q[ZOMQZXRdQV]ZURZOLPW]ZcRZXZXRd
WOLMZR[ZcPZTNSZ_WU $ jTNRZ[XQZXRdQVM]ZPOVWWOLMZR[ZcPXQUVROQZXadP^_MPVZRXkO .
QZTRUVRObPVWQRNLZ_LWMNRMTXWUYZ[NL\LMO]NZWUV^_MPVRZXOZM[XZ\ZcbZdRNOLWNRNdSWLRN[
VaQZcTRLYSVLTPX]ZcdQZLMNOPNQZPNRS .
Nc 7 S 7 QcOVRNZNdaW\ZZY 7 NOVWMQcOVRNZNdaRbUNPWMZUNbTPVRNNbVZcZWUTcX[ 7 Q $ NcXWWd[N 7 ZR_NTRVS
NOVWM 7 VLUVVRZZNNWXWOLMZXQcOVRNZNdaWUQ 7 $ VLMNZLYNS ... ]NZWUV^_MPVRZXX ... WOLMZR[ZcPX 5 .7 @ 4
Nc 7 S 7 QcOVRNZNdaW\ZZY 7 WOLMZX^_MPVZRXRNRZSMW]NLR_VMUZbP $ ]NZWUV^_MPVRZXWWNd $ RPTVWNWdZ
7 YNZ_NRPORcUN .7 RNLSORNPNONMPZMVWO]ZUPRNcUNN $ VZ[PL\SLaPNVTZL_OQNLc]N\d $ QZL^MPRW_VLSOW
QZZ[cNL .
RNLSORNPNOXQNZVXbPVMZ_d $ ZRLXSVLXMPXZadLPQLN\OZVQZ^_NMVRNRZSM - WOLMZXZSdN[VZWdWd .
////
Lc : TZ[LbjYNZ
VOSPVWVOP $ R 7 O
QcOVRNZNdaW\ZZY 9 D)1 8
////
G NOVWMZR_NTRVSNcXWWd[QcOVRNZNdaW\ZZYSNc 7 WOLMZXQcOVRNZNdaZX\WQ 9 201< $8 VLUVVQU 7 H LYNS
]NZWUV^_MPVRZXWMQZZ[NL^TWOVQZXRdXVLMNZ $ QZZaNSPV^_MPVZRX $ RLNPMPZTaSNPW]ZcVZRXN
WOLMZX .7
G NOVWMZR_NTRVSNcXWWd[QcOVRNZNdaW\ZZYSNc 7 VLOXQcOVRNZNdaZX\WQ 7 X 9 2010 $8 VLUVVQU 7 H RNRZSM
VZ[LN_ZWTX]ZcVRdZLUUNbTPN^_MPVZRX .7
I QZLNMZT I
WZUW

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi