0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
249 vues2 pages
A builders risk policy's limit rarely equates with the actual value of the project at completion. Premium adjustment clause stipulates that once the construction project is completed, the insured must report the final completed contract cost. If the project had experienced a total loss a few days prior to completion, the insurer would only be required to indemnify the insured for the maximum limit of the policy.
Description originale:
Titre original
Rationale for Premium Adjustment Clauses and the Importance of Insuring to Full Value
A builders risk policy's limit rarely equates with the actual value of the project at completion. Premium adjustment clause stipulates that once the construction project is completed, the insured must report the final completed contract cost. If the project had experienced a total loss a few days prior to completion, the insurer would only be required to indemnify the insured for the maximum limit of the policy.
A builders risk policy's limit rarely equates with the actual value of the project at completion. Premium adjustment clause stipulates that once the construction project is completed, the insured must report the final completed contract cost. If the project had experienced a total loss a few days prior to completion, the insurer would only be required to indemnify the insured for the maximum limit of the policy.
Builders Risk Insurance Rationale for Premium Adjustment Clauses and the Importance of Insuring to Full Value
Many projects experience an increase in construction values during construction. The original limit shown on a builders risk policy rarely equates with the actual value of the project at completion. Several factors may contribute to an escalation in the contract value, for example change orders (in methods or materials), inflation (in costs of labour and materials) and unforeseen challenges with the project.
The Premium Adjustment Clause
Most builders risk policies contain a premium adjustment clause which stipulates that once the construction project is completed, the insured must report the final completed contract cost upon which the insurer will adjust the final premium.
For example, if the builders risk insurance application indicates an estimated project value of $10 million, the policy is issued with a limit of $10 million at a premium of, say, $10,000. The final contract cost reported on the Premium Adjustment Report at completion is $11 million; therefore, an additional adjustment premium of $1,000 will be charged.
Contractors may ask: If the project had experienced a total loss a few days prior to completion, would the insurer have indemnified me $11 million in damages, or will it limit the payout to the policy limit of $10 million?
Typical Insurers Answer
According to most builders risk policy contracts, the insurer would only be required to indemnify the insured for the maximum limit of the policy, which in our example would be $10 million. The insured would be left with a significant shortfall of $1 million. This is certainly cause for ensuring that the limit of insurance on the builders risk policy is adequate. The situation can be aggravated when debris removal costs following a large loss further inflate the total loss amount. Yet, contractors rarely increase the limit of their builders risk policy to take into account potential debris removal costs, or to keep up with increases in project costs during construction.
This answer may generate additional questions from contractors and project owners: Well, why does a builders risk policy have a premium adjustment clause if the insurer refuses to pay for a loss beyond my policy limit? If I never had the additional $1 million in coverage, why should I have to pay for it?
The premium adjustment clause is rationalized as follows:
(a) In the event the project is completed for less than the limit shown on your policy, the insured will realize a return premium (subject to any applicable minimum retained premium). In such cases, the Premium Adjustment clause works to the insureds benefit.
May 2009 2009 ENCON Group Inc. 1 of 2 (b) The appearance that the contractor does not have coverage for the additional $1 million in construction values is to some extent a misconception. This is because most builders risk policies do not contain a co-insurance provision. In our example, while the policy limit available for indemnity is limited to $10 million, the value of property exposed to loss or damage is really $11 million and same is fully insured against partial losses without requirement for reinstatement. In reality, total losses are very rare. For instance, in the case of a minor fire occurring near the end of construction, the insurer would fully indemnify the insured (subject to the deductible) for each such loss, without application of a co-insurance provision. If the premium is charged on only the estimated project value of $10 million, when the total values exposed are really $11 million, the insurer would fail to obtain a premium commensurate with the values at risk. It would be akin to insuring a larger project for the same price.
Few owners and contractors are in a financial position to (or would choose to) co-insure projects, in effect paying potentially significant parts of claims out of pocket. Hence, the premium adjustment clause is the most viable alternative to ensure the contractor maintains a builders risk policy limit commensurate with the actual exposure.
ENCONs Answer
ENCONs Builders Risk policy protects insureds in the event an escalation of values on the construction project exceeds the policy limit by up to 10 per cent.
Realizing that construction values frequently escalate during a project, ENCON has added to its Builders Risk policy a 10 per cent automatic limit increase clause. The project hard cost limits made available under the policy will automatically be increased by a maximum of 10 per cent of the limit shown in the Declarations, despite the premium being based on the original estimated value.
This is done by means of the following clause contained in ENCONs Builders Risk wording:
If during the policy period, the actual value of the insured project increases, without material change in the scope of the work, then the Limit of Insurance at the site indicated in Item 7 (a) of the Declarations of this policy, excluding the value of any property insured under this policy not included in the contract price, shall be increased accordingly, but in no event to exceed 110% of the original Estimated Insured Value. This clause does not apply to any insurance for Soft Costs or Delayed Opening endorsed hereon.
This clause notably puts the ENCON policy in compliance with the new CCDC 2 standard construction contract which requires that the limit of insurance for the project be equivalent to 1.1 times the contract price.
It is possible that construction values could escalate beyond the 10 per cent automatic limit increase clause. Therefore, when asked to extend the policy period of projects that require an extension, ENCON prompts the broker and the insured to scrutinize and update limits of insurance if the project value has increased. ENCON does this by requiring a Term Extension Questionnaire that inquires about changes in the scope and value of the project.
Summary
Not all builders risk policies are created equal and provisions addressing how limits of insurance may apply to value increases during construction should be taken into account when placing the insurance. The status of the project, including potentially escalating values, should be reviewed on a regular basis throughout construction to identify if increases in the limits of insurance are appropriate to fully protect the insured parties interests.
This document is for illustrative purposes only and is not a contract. It is intended to provide a general overview of the program described. Please remember only the insurance policy can give actual terms, coverage, amounts, conditions and exclusions. Program availability and coverage are subject to individual underwriting criteria. May 2009 2009 ENCON Group Inc. 2 of 2