Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
lic
k
t
o
b
u
y
N
O
W
! P
D
F
-
X
C
hange V
ie
w
e
r
w
w
w
. d
o
cu-trac
k
.
c
o
m
C
lic
k
t
o
b
u
y
N
O
W
! P
D
F
-
X
C
hange V
ie
w
e
r
w
w
w
. d
o
cu-trac
k
.
c
o
m
I
i
h-...__
G --r q -D " 5
1--n
1:1
Subscr i pts
5 =
C Z
r -==" " -| -> :l -
Iu
--I
H'I I=
.1-.
nul l
at
_
mi
| -I
.-| -| .
Super scr i pt
COUSTIC PROPERTIES OF ROCKS
Poi ssons r ati o
densi ty, gi cm3
str ess, Pa
per i od, seconds
por osi ty, fr acti on
bul k
cr i ti cal
dr y bul k r ock
ui d
l ongi tudi nal
matr i x
or i gi nal
compr essi onal
pr i mar y
shear
secondar y
shal e
tr aver se
tr ue
water
" = aver age
Refer ences '
Jenni ngs, H.Y. Jr . and Ti mur , A.: Si gni fi cant Contr i buti ons i nFor -
mati onEval uati onand Wel l Testi ng, JPT (D ec. 19 33) 1432-46.
D obr i n, l vI.B.:Intr oducti onto G eophysi cal Pr ospecti ng, McG r aw-Hi l l
Book Co. Inc., New Yor k Ci ty (19 5 2) .
Car mi chael , R.S.: Handbook of Physi cal Pr oper ti es of Rocks, CRC
Pr ess, BocaRaton, FL (19 82) II.
Ei ot, M.A.: Pr opagati onof El asti c Waves i naCyl i ndr i cal Bor e Con-
tai ni ng aFl ui d, J. Appi . Phys. (19 5 2) 23, 9 9 7-1005 .
Whi te, J.E.: El asti c Waves Al ong aCyl i ndr i cal Bor e, G eophysi cs
(19 62) 27, 32?-33.
Li u, O. Y.: Stonel ey Wave-D er i ved At Shear Log, paper pr esented
at the I9 84 SPWLA Annual Loggi ng Symposi um, June 10-13.
Cheng, C.H. and Toksoz, M.N.: El asti c Wave Pr opagati oni naFl ui d
Fi l l ed Bor ehol e and Syntheti c Acousti c -Logs, " G eophysi cs (19 81) 46,
1042-5 3.
Pai l l et, F.L.: Pr edi cti ng the Fr eq uency Content of Acousr
for ms i nBor ehol es, paper SS pr esented at the 19 81 SPWLA
Loggi ng Symposi um, June.
Ti ttman, J.: Physi cs of Wi r el i ne Measur ements, Schl umber ger Edu-
cati onal Ser vi ces, Houston(I9 86) .
Mi near , J.W. and Fl etcher , C.R.: Ful l -Wave Acousti c Loggi ng,
paper EE pr esented at the 19 83 SPWLA Annual Loggi ng Symposi um,
June.
Whi te, J.E.: Under gr ound Sound, El sevi er Sci ence Publ i sher s, Am-
ster dam(19 83) .
Bl ot, M.A.: Theor y of Pr opagati onof El asti c Waves i n aFl ui d-
Satur ated Por ous Sol i d:ILovv Fr eq uency Range, J. Acousti cal Soc.
Amer i ca(19 5 6) 28, 168-T8.
Bi ot, l 'vI.A.: Theor y of Pr opagati on of El asti c Waves i n aFl ui d-
Sal ur ated Por ous Sol i d:IIHi gh Fr eq uency Range, J. Acousti cal Soc.
Amer i ca(19 5 6) 28, 1T9 -9 1.
Log Inter pr etati on, Voi . I:Pr i nci pl es, Schl umber ger , Houston(l 9 ?2) .
Hi cks, W.G . and Ber r y, J .E.: Appl i cati onof Conti nuous Vel oci ty
Logs to D eter mi nati onof Fl ui d Satur ati onof Reser voi r Rocks, G eo-
physi cs (19 5 6) 21, ?39 5 -4. .
Wyl l i e, M.R.J., G r egor y, A.R., and G ar dner , G .H.F.: AnExper i men-
tal Investi gati onof Factor s Affecti ng El asti c Wave Pr opagati oni nPor ous
Medi a, G eophysi cs (Jul y 19 5 8) 23, No. 3, 45 9 -9 3.
For mati onEval uati onD ataHandbook, G ear har t Industr i es Inc. (19 'i '8) .
Wyl l i e, M.R.J., G r egor y, A.R., and G ar dner , G .H.F.: El asti c Wave
Vel oci ty i nHeter ogeneous and Por ous Medi a, G eophysi cs (Jan. 19 5 6)
21, No. 1, 41-1'0.
Hughes, D .S. and Jones, I-1.] .: Var i ati onof El asti c Modul i of Igne-
ous Rocl -cs wi th Pr essur e and Temper atur e, Bul l . , G eol ogi cal Soc. of
Amer i ca(Aug. 19 5 0) 61, 843.
Fumi atnental s of Cor e Anal ysi s, Cor e Labor ator i es Inc., Houston(19 82) .
G eer tsma, J.: Vel oci ty-Log Inter pr etati on: The Effect of Rock Bul k
Compr essi bi l i ty, SPEI (D ec. 19 61) 235 -48; Tr ans., AIME, 222.
Ti xi er , M.P., Al ger , R.P., and D ol l , C.A.: Soni c Loggi ng, Pet.
Tr ans., AIME (19 5 9 ) 216, 106-14.
Vander Knapp, W.: Nonl i near Behavi or of El asti c Por ous Medi a,
Pet. Tr ans, AIME (19 5 9 ) 216, 1T9 -8?.
Raymer , I_..L. and Hunt, E.R.: AnImpr oved Soni c Tr ansi t Ti me-to-
Por osi ty Tr ansfor m, paper P pr esented at the 19 80 SPWLA Annual
Loggi ng Symposi um, Jul y.
Har tl ey, K.B.: Factor s Affecti ng Sandstone Acousti c Compr essi onal
Vel oci ti es and anExami nati onof Empi r i cal Cor r el ati ons BetweenVe-
l oci ti es and Por osi ti cs," paper PP pr esented at the 19 81 SPWLA An-
nual Loggi ng Symposi um, June.
I.
|
I
Chapter 4 ~
Measurement Environment
4.1 Measurement Environment Effects
Most theoretical concepts of well-logging techniques were devel-
oped with the assumption of an innite, homogeneous, and isotropic
medium. When the borehole is considered, it is taken to be a regu-
lar cylinder of known diameter, filled with homogeneous uid of
known properties. When stratification is taken into account, beds
are usually homogeneous and isotropic.
These assumptions of ideal measurement environment are also
extended to the development of equations for quantitative interpre-
tation of log responses. Data obtained in an actual measurement
environment must be corrected before use in the interpretation equa-
tions. These corrections consist of removing that part of the signal
caused by deviation of the actual environment from the ideal.
A logging tool is usually designed to unction best in a certain
environment. U se of the tool in an appreciably different environ-
ment results in a low-quality or totally nonrepresentative log.
Choosing the tool to be run in a certain wellbore, judging the
log quality, and extracting quantitative information from the meas-
urement require knowledge of the actual measurement environment.
Significant parameters are-the borehole diameter and shape, the
properties of the drilling fluid lling the borehole, the borehole and
formation temperatures, an_ d the radial variation of formation prop-
erties.
4.2 Borehole Diameter and Shape
Measurement of borehole diameter with caliper logging has indi-
cated clearly that the actual borehole diameter often differs from
the bit siz e used to drill it. The difference is considerable in some
cases. Fig. 4.1 shows an actual profile of a borehole drilled with
a 12-in. bit. The section gauge log was used to estimate the hole
volume. It clearly shows that the hole is far from being a regular
cylinder with uniform diameter.
The boreholes actual diameter and shape depend on the forma-
tion drilled. The upper part of the hole appears to be smooth, with
a diameter equal to the bit siz e. In fact, Section A is drilled to gauge,
which is usually the case in hard, consolidated, and impermeable
formations. _
The diameter of Section B is actually smaller than the bit diameter.
This is usually the case in permeable formations drilled with mud
that contains solids. Drilling safety usually requires that the hydro-
static head of the mud column be kept above formation pressure.
This pressure difference causes the mud to flow into permeable for-
mations. The solid particles that exceed the pore siz e are retained
at the formation face. Their buildup forms a plaster-like layer of
very low permeability called a mudcake. The mudcake thick-
ness depends on mud properties and ranges from a thin film to 1
in. thick in most cases. In permeable formations, the borehole drilled
diameter is reduced by twice the mudcake thickness. The mudcake
properties, such as resistivity and density, differ considerably from
those of the surrounding formation.
In Section C of Fig. 4.1, the boreholes actual diameter is en-
larged by as much as 3 1/ 5 in. Such enlargement occurs in soft, un-
consolidated formations because of the scouring effect of drilling
muds. Enlargement also occurs in water-soluble formations, such
as salt, as a result of leaching, and in naturally fractured forma-
tions owing to a weakening of their mechanical integrity.
Borehole enlargements are most commonly observed in shales
and shaly formationsl Because of their electrochemical proper-
ties, clay minerals absorb water, causing the shale formation to
swell. The swelling weakens the formation, and the shale sloughs
and caves. The intensity of sloughing and caving, which results
in borehole enlargement, depends on the physical properties of the
clay and drilling uid. Different clay minerals have different af-
tinities to water. Freshwater-based mud causes more caving than
saltwater-based mud. Caving is usually absent when oil-based mud
is used.
Formation properties responsible for borehole enlargement vary,
causing erratic borehole enlargement, which in turn results in a ru-
gose borehole. Borehole rugosity is apparent in Section D of Fig.
4.1.
Borehole enlargement causes mechanically centered tools to be
situated farther from the formation investigated. The space between
the centered tool and the formation is occupied by drilling mud,
which typically exhibits physical properties very different from those
of the formation. Logging tools are designed to investigate a
prescribed volume; they can usually accommodate a small fraction
of the volume to be occupied by the mud. As that fraction increases
with borehole diameter, the tool response cannot be attributed en-
tirely to the formation. In extreme borehole enlargement, the tool
response corresponds entirely to the drilling uid.
When pad-type tools are pressed against the formation face, the
sensors are separated from the formation by mudcake andlor pockets
of drilling mud (Figs. 4.2 and 4.3 ). Pad-type tools (e. g.,
microresistivity and density tools) have a relatively small radius
of investigation. Consequently, the mudcake z one and mud pock-
ets can considerably affect the tool response.
Adequate analyses of certain log measurements require knowl-
edge of borehole siz e and shape. To determine borehole geome-
C
lic
k
t
o
b
u
y
N
O
W
! P
D
F
-
X
C
hange V
ie
w
e
r
w
w
w
. d
o
cu-trac
k
.
c
o
m
C
lic
k
t
o
b
u
y
N
O
W
! P
D
F
-
X
C
hange V
ie
w
e
r
w
w
w
. d
o
cu-trac
k
.
c
o
m
Chapter 4 ~
Measur ement Envi r onment
4.1 Measur ement Envi r onment Effects
Most theor eti cal concepts of wel l -l oggi ng techni q ues wer e devel -
oped wi th the assumpti onof ani nni te, homogeneous, and i sotr opi c
medi um. Whenthe bor ehol e i s consi der ed, i t i s takento be ar egu-
l ar cyl i nder of knowndi ameter , ti l l ed wi th homogeneous ui d of
knownpr oper ti es. Whenstr ati fi cati oni s takeni nto account, beds
ar e usual l y homogeneous and i sotr opi c.
These assumpti ons of i deal measur ement envi r onment ar e al so
extended to the devel opment of eq uati ons for q uanti tati ve i nter pr e-
tati onof l og r esponses. D ataobtai ned i nan actual measur ement
envi r onment must be cor r ected befor e use i nthe i nter pr etati oneq ua-
ti ons. These cor r ecti ons consi st of r emovi ng that par t of the si gnal
caused by devi ati onof the actual envi r onment fr omthe i deal .
A l oggi ng tool i s usual l y desi gned to htncti onbest i nacer tai n
envi r onment. Use of the tool i nanappr eci abl y di ffer ent envi r on-
ment r esul ts i nal ow-q ual i ty or total l y nonr epr esentati ve l og.
Choosi ng the tool to be r uni n acer tai nwel l bor e, judgi ng the
l og q ual i ty, and extr acti ng q uanti tati ve i nfor mati onfr omthe meas-
ur ement r eq ui r e knowl edge of the actual measur ement envi r onment.
Si gni fi cant par ameter s ar e-the bor ehol e di ameter and shape, the
pr oper ti es of the dr i l l i ng fl ui d l l i ng the bor ehol e, the bor ehol e and
for mati ontemper atur es, an_d the r adi al var i ati onof for mati onpr op-
er tr es.
4.2 Bor ehol e D i ameter and Shape
Measur ement of bor ehol e di ameter wi th cal i per l oggi ng has i ndi -
cated cl ear l y that the actual bor ehol e di ameter oftendi ffer s fr om
the bi t si ze used to dr i l l i t. The di ffer ence i s consi der abl e i nsome
cases. Fi g. 4.1 shows anactual pr ofi l e of abor ehol e dr i l l ed wi th
a12-i n. bi t. The secti ongauge l og was used to esti mate the hol e
vol ume. It cl ear l y shows that the hol e i s far fr ombei ng ar egul ar
cyl i nder wi th uni for mdi ameter .
The bor ehol es actual di ameter and shape depend onthe for ma-
ti ondr i l l ed. The upper par t of the hol e appear s to be smooth, wi th
adi ameter eq ual to the bi t si ze. Infact, Secti onA i s dr i l l ed to gauge,
whi ch i s usual l y the case i nhar d, consol i dated, and i mper meabl e
for mati ons. _
The di ameter of Secti onB i s actual l y smal l er thanthe bi t di ameter .
Thi s i s usual l y the case i nper meabl e for mati ons dr i l l ed wi th mud
that contai ns sol i ds. D r i l l i ng safety usual l y r eq ui r es that the hydr o-
stati c head of the mud col umnbe kept above for mati onpr essur e.
Thi s pr essur e di ffer ence causes the mud to fl ow i nto per meabl e for -
mati ons. The sol i d par ti cl es that exceed the por e si ze ar e r etai ned
at the for mati onface. Thei r bui l dup for ms apl aster -l i ke l ayer of
ver y l ow per meabi l i ty cal l ed amudcake. The mudcake thi ck-
ness depends onmud pr oper ti es and r anges fr omathi nl mto 1
i n. thi ck i nmost cases. Inper meabl e for mati ons, the bor ehol e dr i l l ed
di ameter i s r educed by twi ce the mudcake thi ckness. The mudcake
pr oper ti es, such as r esi sti vi ty and densi ty, di ffer consi der abl y fr om
those of the sur r oundi ng for mati on.
InSecti onCof Fi g. 4.1, the bor ehol es actual di ameter i s en-
l ar ged by as much as 3 1/ 5 i n. Such enl ar gement occur s i nsoft, un-
consol i dated for mati ons because of the scour i ng effect of dr i l l i ng
muds. Enl ar gement al so occur s i nwater -sol ubl e for mati ons, such
as sal t, as ar esul t of l eachi ng, and i nnatur al l y fr actur ed for ma-
ti ons owi ng to aweakeni ng of thei r mechani cal i ntegr i ty.
Bor ehol e enl ar gements ar e most commonl y obser ved i nshal es
and shal y for mati onsl Because of thei r el ectr ochemi cal pr oper -
ti es, cl ay mi ner al s absor b water , causi ng the shal e for mati onto
swel l . The swel l i ng weakens the for mati on, and the shal e sl oughs
and caves. The i ntensi ty of sl oughi ng and cavi ng, whi ch r esul ts
i nbor ehol e enl ar gement, depends onthe physi cal pr oper ti es of the
cl ay and dr i l l i ng ui d. D i ffer ent cl ay mi ner al s have di ffer ent af-
ti ni ti es to water . Fr eshwater -based mud causes mor e cavi ng than
sal twater -based mud. Cavi ng i s usual l y absent whenoi l -based mud
i s used.
For mati onpr oper ti es r esponsi bl e for bor ehol e enl ar gement var 'y,
causi ng er r ati c bor ehol e enl ar gement, whi ch i ntur nr esul ts i nar u-
gose bor ehol e. Bor ehol e r ugosi ty i s appar ent i nSecti onD of Fi g.
4.1.
Bor ehol e enl ar gement causes mechani cal l y center ed tool s to be
si tuated far ther fr omthe for mati oni nvesti gated. The space between
the center ed tool and the for mati oni s occupi ed by dr i l l i ng mud,
whi ch typi cal l y exhi bi ts physi cal pr oper ti es ver y di ffer ent fr omthose
of the for mati on. Loggi ng tool s ar e desi gned to i nvesti gate a
pr escr i bed vol ume; they canusual l y accommodate asmal l fr acti on
of the vol ume to be occupi ed by the mud. As that fr acti oni ncr eases
wi th bor ehol e di ameter , the tool r esponse cannot be attr i buted en-
ti r el y to the for mati on. Inextr eme bor ehol e enl ar gement, the tool
r esponse cor r esponds enti r el y to the dr i l l i ng ui d.
Whenpad-type tool s ar e pr essed agai nst the for mati onface, the
sensor s ar e separ ated fr omthe for mati onby mudcake andtor pockets
of dr i l l i ng mud (Fi gs. 4.2 and 4.3) . Pad-type tool s (e.g.,
mi cr or esi sti vi ty and densi ty tool s) have ar el ati vel y smal l r adi us
of i nvesti gati on. Conseq uentl y, the mudcake zone and mud pock-
ets canconsi der abl y affect the tool r esponse.
Adeq uate anal yses of cer tai nl og measur ements r eq ui r e knowl -
edge of bor ehol e si ze and shape. To deter mi ne bor ehol e geome-
MEASU REMENT ENVIRONMENT 61 '
I5 U IQ
.. _ |-- I r
| [ H ' I ._ l I_ _ U " H _ _ _ mn _ _ " Diumlllr
D ID to 5 IO I
no H 1. J
I20 ll D II-9 5 243
t 1_ _ _ I 4 I _ - i_ - I.--I.
, PROFILE OF TH E H OLE AH D BDLU H ETRIG SECTION GAU GE SCALE
Ili-In
' ID
1| in All-Illlll Elan-our
_ - _ _ .-.. _ _ 1 "" _ -; -FF
-L-. .I...,_ .
:.. -. _ ._ i ll
-- - _ _ _ ; _ _ ; - I H +
Q
IO I i l H 10
_ t - - 4 -- I _ ;r...J--|_ _ | + + --I 1 |-_ -|-- 1 ---I -.
. I, t l.' l_ .l }.l l. _ ll_ FL _ * Ll
I3
4-Li.
".T
' 1
E! ! 4
I
.4- I
Section 5 h' ?wI"q
i--= 1* Tr; v - borehole dlom.
. ' 1 ll-II
_ _ _ -,_ _ 1:!
, I
IIII ...._ |. - less then b|l siz e E
Q
L
| . _ _ - . I - ' ' "' _ '
_ .. _ _ _ . .- : :- l- . ' ' -' -' " ' : " -2 - -
I .. --- - ;._ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
_ -=- .- - . : . ---: -+
TT
_ _ _ -1-._
st
-_ r_ _
III I
II
+ .-.1-I. see
Tl
I pi All 5
I ,-4 -- iiiil i.i:_ iF.i.' u I i_ ;..,.
I I
4> <
I
, 1,:
.
. + 4% ?"
It-I
II ::.i i-I-.-A
"I I i. . 3 "", II
.._ _ ' ,_ ._ .I_
...:.::
tr It
If i Q + 1; _ ..; _ -
-1::
Z ;
|l
IIIi it
II "l
I
-I
I
lgI-I ..._ I.! T_ 7 I_ "
F5 15 1? iii: .
fa
_ Section drilled
I-It L.l Ill ll I
::f --I - I l_ _ _ _ l_
III III
I-;-
@
' 1
- i ans ~
_ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
. [ _ _ _ 1' | -1-
] _ I |-u _ .I _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ I
, ._ IwI-l-r' -- " ' .' i _ .' _ _ '
|-.' .l"- .- _ _ _ -
I to gouge
5 .
5
ll I
I. ll :"T I
Illl
- I i. lT""'
-:1; liI|_ . I
II
""1"
II
r
IIll
l
I ' ' I
I I
IIIIII III
IIIIII IIIII [ III
' 1T"*
-| I -I-F
-.-I--I_ .,
. --- _ ..? _ .. T TI;
ll! III
II it. .' .H _ |@. ..
.' _ _ I =_ _ . "I" _ - - ' -- if
. I q. ' ."i"_ ' _ _ _ _ ' . ._ l_ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ -._ -_ .l_ ---z l E .1 ' ;-"Ir--I _ -I" ;;- 1."-
A 5 ! -I ii" :_ ; ; "+ L_ l_ ' "
_ i " .+ ._ ; ,_ _ il :_ _ _ _ .. . - _ .. .,.-_ ..;- .. --
_ | I ' ' " _ ' :_ _ Tf ' "" ' _ Y "IKT " ' _ ,_ _ Y 7 1'
_ _ W I I
I, .1._ ._ ::, - - 3 _ _ - _ _ _ ' :._ ;_ _ ;:;=- .-_ _ l ' ;;.; _ -;-.
I O _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
._ . I_ _ 1 ' . _ . ,_ - _ _
n.-I . 1 I
_ ;_ _ _ _ _ -.- -l-:- -_ _ - -_ r:"---
ll ._ . ,,_ _ _ _ _ ._ _ _
IQ?! _ _ _ _ :_ _ ..
.i._ _ .I
="' .:I: t
_ ._ _ - I -- I-
II!
I I p-..' :.. _
- =-:-..
Ii
n ,;:ti -. iiEEl"' ;,=3 Enlarged borehole
_ _ _ _ .... _ . in . _ .
-. - -
_ _ ]_ _ _
. . _ ._ _ ,---
um-I
it
_ ;;i - l_ -- I ---- -
5
at? I
.-.-. - _ ._ :;. _ ;;;;-t I _
_ _ _ _ _ _ . I . .
. 5 L _ "' _ .
' _ lI;:I" . _ :t"t- iv:
---_ ' I ' ' I' ' _ I_ ' _ ' _ - _
.:im...:i
1
- - =' ..i.:l' _ ' ."_ ' _ j
...._ -_ -..;:_ _ -=._ _ -_ -:_ _ _ :_ _ L_ _ _ I[ _ _ I:-_ _ ' ? g '
.----- I Ii - _
- _ .:_ _ -_ -:: | - ' -' - - - -_ l - "T ,.l._ I, II&
_ l""I I5 F; Ii-r
T_ I ..
J H I _ _ ir-I -. I I
-' ~ I
_ i .- -- .r =--
_ | .. .1............T I
. _ i _ _ _ .I:_ =;:-:.--- !
IIl..|
I
I..
-" F-- 1,--r-. -ELI
--1 -
we
iii
,,
lT_ -;.-' _ _ p
_ -i
II
_ _ _ _ E _ _
_ _ 3 _ _
ct
_ _ _ _ _ :_ _ _
-- _ g
I ii: i' m||"' 5
Iti.
lit-I
7 - .
- _ ._
_ -5 - " ::-_ -.
--
Ir
_ _ _ ._ ?.. - ---- ' "' .
1 if 1% ; 3 1-
! * " l.' ."- --
-
ii =1 1 "
..I_ _ _ ,.n_ _ I -I
i
j* 3 I' I 5 . 1 ifA
_ - _ :_ _ -:. _ -
.-|.-..-..-
El I
was
as
qr.
' .; .2 _ ._
' "
_ It 1; .-.
"P_ ' P
- t
.
-
-._ I
' - ' :
l"-"* ' l"* ' l
I
III
Y?
real
, II
.n.I
Ti H I .1 I:
1
.-.-_ - - _ .-.--- 5
L:: "ii ._ i _ _ _ _
I1 _ _ L_ _ ' 1 _
% 1;.ii' - ac. 3 :;.z . . -- -- _
I .;tm:f" _ _
"II:I Ti -* - -. _ _ _ ".-
:-- t ' ie= -~ :* = ' _ . .
' ! E; _ _ - .. _ " It
r r -
-ijiiii _ _ _ ; --1 ---- _ _ _ _ I ' -
,
If!
-|-' r--
ii-I: ' ! ""T I_ I I It-I-1
-I-i
5 ;. if - if R u qos B
f _ _
F-
" ra ,_ , _ .:
nu _ ._ . _
-I
. f;ifi.- Q > borehole
. ---- --=.- ----
_ _ :' i..' -
section
I.
|_ _ _ "' :' - -
_ -.;
_ _ r |._ ._ _
g _ | ._ -.=.. .
: . ' T_ _ _ 1;; _ : . _
.. J _ . - -- ' --"_ -" L _ _ _ :_ ;% -_ :_ _ '
I _ _ _ _ _ - ---
_ ~ E ;;;r;:x;;: "-
i
1--
..I.._ '
-i--L
if IN-ti
L;..I ..
I.:' .i I
";I ' I"' :t * Tl[ Tt""
{' 5 I! -,-
_ ' I
- _ - - _ .,_ :_ - . _ .
- -- l
L
I _ ;.' .' ;=;.' .-.= .-; - , _ _
----i-
."
f* * LTLi a
n I
_ ;;L: I iE
_ . - I" .
_ __ , _ _
it ... . I--
_ "_ -' mi _ _ I_ _ . _ -- ---
-: _ _
- _ _ _ _ _
' TT* * i
:11
QFE
"ii7 ' T -J
-|I ' _ 1' . _ |_ _ _ _ _ ._ _ _ _ .
_ _ _ _ _ _ .a_ .. : . ' -- | '
II ' _ _ _ .;.._ ;--.:. _ _ :
_ II . _ - ._ _ I I
' 11
cl,
- ~ ~ ::II. I
I_ _ _ _ _
nu" all -_ =' -. * I+ % "% l Y "' ".'
I! ! I".I! lIIl! '
.4,
- .....
I 1 l "--2-ll-It
_ _ ]._ _ _ _ _ . _ _ l_ _ ._ 1 I _ _ . _
_ _ T._ _ 4 _ ,
-- - I- " -I- _ .-. _ |- '
u
I: ' :.-' 3 -Y -.-1-' t . _ -
? .. ..._ _ _ _ ' :;t1_ _ i-"' _
. T T_ TT' " _ Q_ :r:i"" ""r::t--- "
* 1 ; .-_ _ ' _ ' :' .' ;' f_ _ :_ - -.--.----- .
_ - "t_ ..._ i._ .-' ----.-- ---=.---F . _ . - I -- I
I1 ' - ""_ - .._ j;' . H 11.1?-" QT ~ * - - . . - I
i -- - --- i -"1"-' -' ; ;;
; ' ! 1 k = " -7 Ii | I _
H .. - _ _ _ - _ ._ _ ...,_ _ .,...,
I
Q
i 1-! -
i_ -- : '
ll
.::: tlllt
,. t' _ ' | II
Fig. 4.1---Profile of a borehole. I
- - 11:.-r. .. ' ' ' ' ' " ' -
try, a caliper log is usually run with microresistivity, density, side-
wall neutron, sonic, and dipmeter logs. Fig. 4.4 is a schematic of
the microresistivity log caliper. Two pads are pushed against the
formation by two opposing arms that work together to keep the main
body of the tool centered in the hole. A spring-like mechanism ex-
tends the arms so that the pads are in continuous contact with the
borehole wall. The outward stretch of the arms that follow the bore-
hole diameter is converted to an electric signal calibrated to yield
the borehole diameter. The tool is calibrated at the surface by placing
it in metallic rings of standard diameters, usually 8 and 12 in.
The contact pads of the microresistivity tools are at least 6 in.
long. Therefore, small hole irregularities cannot be detected. Max-
imum tool stretch is usually limited to 16 or 18 in. The distance
between the pad faces when the tool is collapsed is usually 6 in.
C
lic
k
t
o
b
u
y
N
O
W
! P
D
F
-
X
C
hange V
ie
w
e
r
w
w
w
. d
o
cu-trac
k
.
c
o
m
C
lic
k
t
o
b
u
y
N
O
W
! P
D
F
-
X
C
hange V
ie
w
e
r
w
w
w
. d
o
cu-trac
k
.
c
o
m
I
I
___
MEASUREMENT ENVIRONMENT
G AUG E EG ALE
-I
D I I5 " ID U I0 ti 5 I0 I
_t __ I I
H _ H " D i ameter
, PROFILE IJF THE HOLE AND IHZILLIHETRIG SECTION
ttl l i l ter --
' zc
I
i n r l u H1. -I
IEO l l D II-{II 5 243
_ I t I _- t_- L-I. 1_ I
| -_;| -- _ -.
It anpl l tl l l l i l l nntu
-| - ---I-u 11-? .I\.| Il It FF
-p--w
.| _ .. ... .__ i
.| ..,,_.
Q
| .... t --i f--I ;L5 9 -Lk+I---I I I IF
8;" -1 L L_I_.i l _I I. '1i {_I_ Fl . * Ll
--- -. | .---:- . .---7"
Ir n-ul r '._ L. -1* . E_.._---
I-Li
" T [ I1
Secti onshowi ng
,____1 , __-.
..
'1
E!!i
_ q Pt; ;;._ ' ' _ ' " _;f" ' ._"
._ -';'_'; - 1 I-_:'? ._.Ti _i '_. T ' . .. Q " ;____ _'.
;jII!. eaoor r t ji
=> * bor ehol e di am.
.!
. '1 l l -It
___-,__ :tI
: I
IIII ...._| . l ess then bl t si ze E
Q
L
| . __ - . l I ' '" ' -' --'
_ .. ___. _: :-I-. ' ' -'-' " '-' " -2 - -
I .. --- - ;.__ _ __ __ -
_-;--_- -_ j _ - -.-r ; - .- 1;- ::;; - :- -4-
TI
-_r __ . .." | l l
at
i l l I
II
;a +.,_l . we
TI
I Ch? QIi i _] H7fmCff' I
I 5 - -- Tffi i i _13_i :'_i _ ' o ..._ . ._.. ._ .- .. I i _;....
I;
4> <
I
, 1,:
.
. r i ff?"
It-I
II :I.i i -I-.-F
" l I i . . 3" " , II
| -o--i --'-I-
...t.::
i t
L-I-II-
It
I| II i t
. I II -.
'|
-I
I
| ;I.-. ..._
.__ ._ ___ I |
IIII I
I='" I"
_i _ i 1,| Ii :!:' I
" -I.
I!I .. _ Secti on dr i l l ed
I-It L.l Il l l l I i i T; I ~ I-l IIIIl l
-I-.-_
, " ---" - ._IwI-l -r '-- "
' ___.. '" -" " | -.'.t" - .-
.- to gouge
I
- 3 I
i =5 5 I I I B I I " _ tr : ' " I" ___J Y _-T _
I
I;
I
i t
Il l l
- : i . IT" " '
-:1; hI| _ . I
i I
" " 1"
II
5
IIl l
49
11
.'.o_| i ...
.__. ._._.l .
t'
-.-I--I_..
I " :1--* '.Z'i _TT _ H ' H I _ m r 1.
__ _ ____ __ ____ .__ ______ .__:._____ __:_.._ . _
.- __ _-_ I I 1-_ - ___'____ _ - -
_ I I or - - _- - ' _ __l _____ _ " Z
;_ --- - ._-_.I_---: E 1 ' ;-" Ir --I _-I ' ;;- :;- _ *
. : _LT_- : ' ' ' ' - - --- ' - '_ t T_ T
. . I -~ --- I e---
_ - -_F_; ,__ .l :.___ .. . - .;. .y.-_..;- .. -- _ _
__ - - _-{fi t I 1=3-ti " " " i --1-.5 ?
__ H 1 I __
,. .g._._:,, . . 3 __ __ - -2. .=- .-__r --E-2.. .-;-. I: " __. _ ._
. Q .
l _i f
._ . .__ _ - ------- ----- ---1-
l l .__ ,,_ __ __ .___
IQ?! _ ___ :_ _ ..
.4. __.
___ _- -- ---'- ---.l ---to '1
i ::I:.
II!
_..J .
IT ." \
.| ._ _
T -- " __' -
- --.-r ~ - -| .
____ __
I i -1 l :5 ui " tte Enl ar ged bor ehol e
__ -- 1, _ r
._ p" _'@ :;:_ :---_ I '
_, _ _ _
_ _-_-.; :: ;-.r -- -
I - t_-- I ---- -
5
i pI
.-.-. - _._:;. _;;;;-r .! _
____ _ _ . I _ . _ .
- - '" -I . 5 -:
---_ 1 ' 'I' ' _I_ '_'_- _
.:tm...::
1
__;- ____-_____;:_ _ =' ._.:l '_}_'.,i _j_'_
'? g '
.----- I ti - _
I _.:__-_-::| - '-'- - - -_1 - " T -I-+ I?
_I" 'l IIT
J H
tr It We
m:1m'
-. r .uT.,q - I
1_ 1;
~ eee
_i .--I.r =--
. _t _-_ .r _ =;:-:.---!
_'Z
-ELI
--1 -
-Iv-I-I
anti
r ]__,.-In
__-. E - - .1;
__ S -_
D
__ _ _ ___i _ ____ __ __
II ';; _ L _ F . ;-'-
.._,___ l _ _
he
i i i i 'ml " * 'f
I- 41
gar --
- _ g
7- .
t
tr
I
- ___
_ -5 -" ::-_-.
--
Ir
.__ ._?.. -----'" '.
i fi f1% ; 2 1-
.--- --
-
.:_,=1
..I__-.,.| ,J_- I -I
,.__. ..:.t* _t
I
2'1_@ -'; 5 . II
_- :_::. - 5 --'
.-| .-..-..-
we
to
,T
' .; .2 ___
' "
_It 1; _-_
-I
.
-
-._:
'- ':
r -I-" * r :t
I
l l
'.qTl - vl T
that
oneness
an
Ti
.-.-_ - - _.-.--- 5
-. I: ' -i f _-_ __ __ _-
I1 __L__' 1 _
-Ir . 3 :. . -- _- _
I .;r .__-T _. _ _
" II: I Ti -* - -. ___" .-
:-- l ' ' _ . .
'1 E; __ - ,. _ I i t
r H -
-i ji i i i _-_; --- ---- ___ _! '-
,t_-I
1?-I: 1" " -" T,
HI.1] I:
1
i f Ruq ose
I _ _
r 5 -+ -- 1- L > bor ehol e .
r e i - I+
;;;;~ I s ecti on
| I-:- :--- . " -'- -
.__ __ ___ M ---
__.;
t I ----
; _ | ___ ._-.=.: ...
. 'T_ _. __. _. , - 1;"
1: I _-.__ i t Y_' _ ___
t_| .-l _| _L!_.l ..l _tJ_J._U
1--
..l .._ '
-i --L
'" I
.nIu
- I-I-:I - " * Tl II" "
Iwl Fr i
5 7:.-
-T I
- -_- - _.,_:_- . _ .
- --l
" I L
I _ ;.'.';=;.'.-.= .-; - , _ _
."
I;-_ | -[ 5 1,
KC
a I
-_" .._I_;.-__ I I
_. - 1" " .
_ __ , _ _
i t ... . --
_" _-' mi _ _ I__. _ -- ---
-: __
- __ _ _ _
-| | ' _1' . _| ___ __ .____.
__ __ __.e_.. :. ' -- | '
II ' _ __.;.._ ;--.:. __:-
_ II . I .__ I I
emote
i i "
:11
QIT
~ ha
II: 5 ?.
- i t i t ::II. I
I__ ___
- -T-H-l l -I
I
5 | | .
i | | | -|
ITTyi h I_='-I. % e-
. -- I ---
l l -
:-r - - --- --I I---- _
_.;_;-__... ---. ?11
. __ __ ______ __ _ _
.. - _. ----- -- +---I
" '-" 4 ; .- " " - ;. .
_- :.. 1. Q '-_-i f _ _____ ______ ________ __
I . -- - ' ._F._.. _.
| _ ' -_ ___ .__;___ ; _ ;_.- -- --
5 - ____ " _ ____,______ ;_
- 1 P i I__ _j_ -5 1 _._.'i _
I Q 1 l " --2-l l -I;
__t___ ___. __ l __._ 1 _ _. _
I wu-
i _-- : '
l l In
III-Il l l l
" T " IT .__; I4
I_ ..n.._...!.; _:T'T.__i T:TP'_" . mi .'_I_I._.l Il _,,;... i n-
Fi g. 4.1--Pr ofi l e of abor ehol e. .
- - 11:.-r . .. '''''" '-
tr y, acal i per l og i s usual l y r unwi th mi cr or esi sti vi ty, densi ty, si de-
wal l neutr on, soni c, and di pmeter l ogs. Fi g. 4.4 i s aschemati c of
the mi cr or esi sti vi ty l og cal i per . Two pads ar e pushed agai nst the
for mati onby two opposi ng ar ms that wor k together to keep the mai n
body of the tool center ed i nthe hol e. A spr i ng-l i ke mechani smex-
tends the ar ms so that the pads ar e i nconti nuous contact wi th the
bor ehol e wal l . The outwar d str etch of the ar ms that fol l ow the bor e-
hol e di ameter i s conver ted to anel ectr i c si gnal cal i br ated to yi el d
the bor ehol e di ameter . The tool i s cal i br ated at the sur face by pl aci ng
i t i nmetal l i c r i ngs of standar d di ameter s, usual l y 8 and 12 i n.
The contact pads of the mi cr or esi sti vi ty tool s ar e at l east 6 i n.
l ong. Ther efor e, smal l hol e i r r egul ar i ti es cannot be detected. Max-
i mumtool str etch i s usual l y l i mi ted to 16 or 18 i n. The di stance
betweenthe pad faces whenthe tool i s col l apsed i s usual l y 6 i n.
62 TH EORY, MEASU REMENT, AND INTERPRETATION OF WELL LOGS
H ole
Axis
' ti;F5 Eai5 ?;?;"f=:tis=Ea?a?ii s=115 "' ~ fs-< =siaitti -=E"' "Y=> ' I1=1i=i:"r' vti=i=i=?=?==i- "' =E' j=E1E:i
weemmme.' . ...-.-;' j-j-I-' .' ..-. .1 ;' ,-, _ -' - I-, _ -_ -j-j-' .' .' .' .' .' . .-.3 .
--=-==i2t-' =""i==ih" ' =fi=E* =-" ' "=2iit-.-=i"* ==ia?as..-.4' =;?a =isiiE5 E5 E5 iii???is
ass-' _ =-=;i;i;-;' :" j' E"=tr' _ a==5 ;5 ar _ -"I, _ .-==,...,.:-="tiaa=, ..-=I1=E5 =:=r=-l=iii' t=-. .
I
I Iil7 ' },_ ililfifi:-1, ..' :i-Iii:-:-:~ ..-* iE5 ' :5 li5 ii-,_ -ilii iiiiii:% g;3 :' -T:iI ii:$iiiII:s* g% :..-:5
:I~ ' E=E=:=:-:1" "=:i:~ :-' -' ";i;r; ' =:=:;.; 1' 5 :5 5 :-.;:tj-t=:=.-:% :% "f:2> ' ' -=:=:=:1.l;-:I;I-"< 5
=":l' f;- _ / -:1: -i:i:' \:;% -l;:;::; "i' :: .--R:i:7 -:5 ' 5 ;i;i:i:i:7 ?r7
I
. ;
. I
I .,.{$4:l . . . ,,:Q_ g_ ca_I I .
it
K ~ . \ ' -.\
% T ii % "e Ia I
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
44"!
' -.i:i:-.-.I:I-' ' -I:i:-t--' - ' i:i' ?-5 " "' :i:i: .- ' i:i:..-I""' i:i:-. .. * i:f:-. -:
Eliliiiili 1I:~ _ ._ .;f:' 5 i5 IiIE i' |ii; :Ii".- 5 ?-iii:- Ellis; 1:5 3
jfjllllii-7 5 .-@Ji:3 ;3 ;I;I, ,. :gr;.;.;.% :j:[ :-.;- -* i5 j::;' i% :E:-i?:-5 @i:i:~ ,. ' ~ ";:j;i:l:? '
:1:-, ' "' iiifi?-""' 1i1i:i7 " ":=:=:i:-"' > ' ii:?.' % -l:! --5 " ' Iifif~ .- ' i:i:$?-13 " * 1:i:T
" \2- I .- /
M * 2 T I Q
r/ it' s * ~ Se o E}T;5 }I; jI;?:2 ::;?5 :1: -{ii ,| _ } Q. g ::E$\_ _ Q-II_ n S r S
I;I;I;l;._ .;.-"~ ,' \i:::::\-,_ -_ -' ' * l;I;I;._ .;.* l-.-I._ .;.; _ 4."I| ; ._ .;. .-.- "5 ' -"' .f.
* . ._ ._ . . ,. |||t||," ,._ .,-,}-_ }- \._ ._ ._ :> r- * 1}. . H .. ' .' : . --.-.-. _ _ -;>
-.
* -. ~ . < -
I S
5 -:-.;EE5 : -_ ;: r;;;;-:-:;;E:.. _ _ .-:-' -:;EE::. _
eeeeeweee
H ole
Axis
TOOI Pd
=5 5 --.5 1"' I"i' $IE.-.-I:i ' .' =t' -' -5 =te:=:i.' .;ai:' ' 5 5 -' -t:I~ ' > "_ a==-";i===* =t:i;' ' ."l2=> =% .i?;teti="* -ti=tert* ' -=
t .=_ ,-="~ < z i--...:' is-.==,;;s@a;+ ";z ;::-.;i;. -5 "is-t:.._ ..ga;z # -z iz t...,L:g;a> -.5 5 1..,a="-;;s-..,=;Ij -.2ai' =~ < :::
:;:-' 5 ' :;:;._ ::;-:r-5 1$:-ti-:il:r' as-rL~ ;' -"-r;:;;-< :Ia' -l-:rv;1li::;,t-:-- -.* -:! :I- -'
-r;:.' g' i.-"-_ -:I@I-' -.;:EJ:::Efl-:_ -:5 :-..;:.::EI' ' 1:"' -I' ;:t;".:;,lii";?;:liiI;$l;"-.;::ji;_ ~ 5 -l;:-_ ;-
~ =.-:-. :==- -.=_ _ _ .; --:.~ ,=te .-,:e.=- .2=titas=-at=dire;=+ -.1:=% < -it=g,,.> :$;=e;=.> --::==~ d=;r
-;;;a,~ h=" ea 1=-ii;i1=:' i ."-="-z ;:2' ?,> =;$;r5 = ~ ;=.-% ;-.=% -=' ' -;==-;-.t_ I;' _ a=-"-;s ,5 :"T==-'
. ' :i-.-::- ,. ' -:;._ ' :- :1-' -:1:-. .I- ,- -l-_ .:.' ;' ' "-:;.._ _ : : -1:-.-:1-' i;i-' --:1:-. .-
@ ,.i . . I Ig' IF .-' --L 4?
=:e~ .5 g_ t -;g~ .> -s$:s1=> s;.% t-+ @i3 ' ,s% ;l> ~ $a$+ r-.+ I=
er ...p~ a ~ =ti1* ;.e' > -' ~ ' e or ggef
H .
.
_ ' ii-=
-as a
I:
1 . . :._ ;:! _ 1;;-_ ::E;:_ _ _ i : 7 _ |;I :.;
- 1 I - " _ -II" ,._ ._ ._ -_ . _ . ; ,
* 1' II " . ' 1 ' _ ,i. : .' .-"' -c-. " 3 :1"--:-. .1 ii -:5 : : 5 " ' i- _ _ I i:i"' -.;:-._ .
I pg, i I |1' -g -"' -P JI$:E.-
- H .--=;== -::i~ -2. ' ~ "- .-' ".i="' % ~ ==."--.-iii
- . 1 12% 1 :' -I 1- .-I' ' 5 .-Ii "I"
% a
Tibet
I I ' i
-, .- 2 I. -. pg-,~ .. 3 ' ,. .1H ,_
I - - .- . . . .. _ . |
- .-
'
ummmmmmu
g hff fives issee fit
all stitt
- v
.
I _ 3 :
' -:-:~ * -- -:-:-. ./ ' -.- . -- i -/ ' ~ .--J.-.~ - .- .-.- .-: - F + --"~ --- -
I:I:I ' ' ~ tiIi-% f_ < ::-r-r- ' -' -in ,.-gt-t-.~ .-.-.''
I I
"
' ;5 :?i:-: / 5 15 1--' 5 i -E5 5 5 5 :-:- ii??? "' :i1:-:' Will:-,-"' ' iiEi.. _ -:I:"1:* i::i
.- . ii-' .-ii: T :5 " .,-:5 -I .-fir vii Ii
I ' 11-. dig? @e% "T' f-$ifl$:;eit"Tif.~ s"T?T@"e?
1' "< =' * ' H ' a -. I;
._ , . , fr15 . -:;,,-% ;.=* -* ,l3 ?;I_ s~ 1-"-* =-~ ,"~ =.' ~ fdrt-- ~ :=- 3 ? 3 =-"
I
ii-' -._ .-:13 :j:i:I$:-' * i:i:-.._ .-:3 :Ii' :iiiI9;:i:7 :. / * 3 tYii};} ' i:i:i:i:-._ ,;;tI:" - ifgf - Iifiiiigii -
I = tiaati --3 -;t_ ~ ,=* .;' " ' '
I rfeieefeeadei ;
Fig. 4.2--Pad-type tool separated from the formation by Fig. 4.3 ---Pad-type tool trapping drilling-mud pockets In ru-
mudcake. I gose borehole.
The range of caliper measurement is then 6 to 16 or 18 in. The rugosity seen on the log reflects the path of the tools extended arm
pressure exerted on the pads is low, so in permeable z ones, they on only one side of the borehole. The other side is being smoothed
ride over the mudcake. The log reading is then the hole drilled di- by the longer tool. Because of the pressure exerted on the tool, the
ameter minus twice the mudcake thickness. arm tends to cut through the mudcake. The log reading is roughly
The density- and pad-type neutron tool calipers are obtained from equal to the borehole drilled diameter minus one mudcake thickness.
an arm attached to the body of the tool (Fig. 4.5 ). The arm is pushed The sonic log tool is centraliz ed in the hole with three equally
hard against the borehole wall to keep the tool in good contact with spaced bow springs (Fig. 4.6). H ole diameter is derived from the
the formation. The measured caliper is the distance between the stretch of these three arms, which usually work together (i.e., they
metallic skid attached to the arm and the tool face. open and close equally).
The rigid, relatively long tool cannot move in and out of a bore- Anisotropic formation mechanical properties result in an oval or
hole enlargement that is shorter than the tool length. The borehole egg-shaped cross section. 2 An enlarged borehole usually assumes
I M d h I I
I Measured Borehole estggupgrre Ge
I Caliper
/ '
a - B h I ."'
, Borehole % Mud cnke - I iiilglloe Mud Coke I
I
emk
$1?
T \-
* ' \.\t\.\\* ~
o\\\\
5
s gt
.s
\
* \\\I.\\\
Well
\_ \\\\\\\\\\' .
\\T3 K
A\\\\\\\\\\\' \\\\\\\\\Y' l\
u Arm
\TooI
Pods
\\\\\\\\\\\\\}\_ \_ \\\
\
&\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
i
\\
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Skid '
Tool
_ _ _ oq._ _ _ T_ ' _ _ _ ' _ _
Fig. 4.4--Schematic of microreeietlvity log caliper. caliper.
A -=-= I Fig. 4.5 Schematic of density and pad-type neutron log
I
C
lic
k
t
o
b
u
y
N
O
W
! P
D
F
-
X
C
hange V
ie
w
e
r
w
w
w
. d
o
cu-trac
k
.
c
o
m
C
lic
k
t
o
b
u
y
N
O
W
! P
D
F
-
X
C
hange V
ie
w
e
r
w
w
w
. d
o
cu-trac
k
.
c
o
m
I Hol e
THEOFIY MEASUREMENT AND INTERPRETATION OF WEi _.'
Axi s
' 5 5 5 E5 E5 E5 ;i ;Y's=;3 g1:E5 i 5 i ;E:11; " " E:E-141EEi i i f'< EF:" " ?:> ' j;=:5 :i j-;?'sg;5 ;5 :;:;;;;;;;sg;5 5 -j:5 ;5 ;t
--=-=n.~ -=" " i =i e;=" '" '=fi i :=r -T" ==zi at-..=i =% ==i ai fs.__.?" =;?aBi i i i i i E5 E5 i i i i i i i s
.< s. =
agar :sr age==;=;@ :=;=;r ??% ar r ;;;=;r 3% r =i sr -'s==a=aas:-s=a=sesda-=:;=;=a=:
I
I-I-I-~ -I" '=:=:=..:-:-" F" =5 ?r -" 1' " i i i :-. " " 15 1-~ . .-i 5 :3:i :7. " :13:--'5 " 'i i i i i :i :-:~ .-:-IEEI-i
T
T
I T
l Tool Pod _.,\
si r si s e
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
,eeege.gageagpgg -* - . _-
;.'j:j:::[ r ' _.'i i i [ 5 ,; ___;If[ [ j% f='i :_;j% :i ::_J.-:i " " :{:{f _f=:=_" ' 'i i i $ .;.;.5
:-:-, -'.=:!:--' .111-:-. ;:=:. -ti --r ='!'!--' -=-=-=-- -=' ai -
" \2- r .- ,4. .\. l l I I * 1 :
e -. -1, e 5 5 e n3 0 | ' 3
" i '-'-:~ ._-_I-'-* 1-I-i s ..-" '~ :-:-:-. .-:1;-,.,,-.- -. ':+: :< .4
i 'i :i :-* --- -'-l g:-2; :-:-:-:;-:;- ~ :-:-:;:;5 -$ 5 -T - 1:" i '='-
H.
* -. ~ . 9
4?! i Sensor s
l
r -r -.-.-:-:-: .-~ .'-'- .-. - .- .-:-:- ~
;'-~ :;:;:;., ':::;._;::-:-'-:;:;;;,_;;.-'-:;:;[ ?% :-:;:;.g:% ;;-:-:;. ~ 5 5 __.-. --:;;;;:-.__
=-===. x . -' ' ==a" s
:-;-; -5 :111-.-1%_.:i =i -:r .F ,:i :i :-..?.i -'-'-I:-:-., -;l ;-,-,'% jI:I'I'I'?% '=:i :-..> " " '11
" :i :i :?:Z;I-' '=:=:E: ..-" ~ :1:i :i : .:--" ~ i :i :" ..< 1* 'i ;..r -:-';:;_.--'~ i :i :; --"
. '
_.-:r -:=:=.-.'==. .-'1:i :=:f$ .-:1:-:'.< . .1:=-Ir ;-' " -'=-=:-. -'i :i :-:> '-'$ " " .1'l .'l :?.-:I.-
:; " ;:;:;r ;:r '-'-:g - '-';:;:-r --- ~ :-pg :-'+-.5 _.;:;:;:,.,r '-:-:i i ~ }_% ;-:;:;:;:
I
T
35 1* -" TE? 71I5 1:1:35 -" '11i Ii i :@ fi i 4i % :1i 1:75 " " i i i .g " :i :i 5 i 'i E
l " i i i :~ ..-E:" 'i " ;:E._ __ l :! 43i Ii i i i
==:=egsai nehr =:sssi e=i s:=-" i ====a=r ..--s< i =i r % i si -r r wai i r r r ar ss-get
' " i 'i 'i :- j:i :i :i :-.-I-I-E-:-:-:~ -.-.-5 -I:I:F'% f* .;-:.;r :% :;:-I-;~ .; ' -';:;:;._.--- " -:-:-:-:~ . -s
45 % :i i i 7% -I-;;5 ;5 'f% % i 5 f5 % -jl l l fi i r -:% 5 j:k?:-> g'Q5 :-:g.-5 -'-:-:- {f:? - 1.
- '-:;.;._.-'1'" --.i ::_ :i ::~ .:-:-:'c'i :i :. :I- ." ::::-.
-ta=2=.,:% -" s==,-.-., -"
'-i ;i :-_-'-' -:;:;.~ .-'-' i 'i :i :-. 1:1:-. ;-.-'~ ;;:;._ _ vi" ;i ---:-:-:r ,
';:;:;@ " ~ ;;:;T'@ 3'_ ..;:5 " -r -@ !i " * l ;i : -.-:I'f;i ;_ :-:;m.;-Qi :i :
,
-" ' ';I;I~ __-' 'I:I;I}:\___. ~ 1;i :I;I;-,_:;- " I;I;- _-" ~ 1$ ) I'H- " " \;~ r r ;} 'I;I;IjT;
::;:[ :% .;5 .'% 1;.'-i :f::;.r $ 4 --5 * -_:;/ \;;;:;:~ ._;:-' _f:I:I:=:
_ '~ :4:i :i - j::'1::: . " -:' i i * "
..'-1:i :i {_-j< 1:=;i :=:% / < '. - - E " Ci t Yo i s : _ " " .;.-.-" ~ '=E=E=E=
;-I-T I;I;I;% Ij-" i IEIE% -" -'i ,::\:,_I-_- ;I':+:_f::i ;I;._ __..,:,_. :=:- ,;I:% :':' I
/ / _'-H (.2 1-Hr . 1./ r '-'-'* -' " H\\ --IT ---1.
as e ~ e as . r s
Hol e
Axi s
TOOI Pd
:,:,:h__:_: ._._:_\_.;:;- \.;.;._\__;_;, -,:,:_ ___:_ ._:_ _ _.c_._ ..1| ;/ -.:._._._.,___:;._.; I H _!__J_ -;_.._;_:____. _,L I I,--_:_:____:,_ a$ _;5 ' g.-i i --_;!;i ___. '. - 1-5 ;. _,_
==i !'i -'_:1i i ;r -' E119 5 ?" ' " 1:=:-.r -> -" " :=:- ..-i i -l -i ?r -I--- 1 . : :' Ii ." i t+'~ ~ i * EF'-:IE-.-::@ 'i i * r ~ i I~ .==~ @ .* i :% i " t5 - =1-.-:1 F I --\.'.* .'. .-H---~ ---'--'-' --.'.'.'. 1-'.-.-.- .1.1.-.-_-5 -_ .-,-,-,_j~ _-_.5 .:.'-'-'-'- ! - '\;.g.-.;.;!-_ , -{L _._ ;| :\.[ . : pf:-_,;!:___.5 ,_-t$ ,5 ,@ :,:_q ,_;5 -_____5 _'\p?,* t_:,;5 _.,:-,1h-g:5 .___.5 .,:\;._ :;5 ._w;.;.__.:._
|
==:i =e:';Ir easi ." ;a:'-':se:% si @ i :j '5 i * :?:i 'fti i 'L';i ===l i i i ?i s* ?i * i * 'i i i i i i 5 * -i i 5 t* i i f"
- 5 1." ;-:i :i i s:I=" ' -. -;$ i * Yr ?=:* i ;i 3si ~ .-?" a-=5 ?
' i -c3:- .-i " _ Ii i -.g!___. " i :i '.;::_% 'i i " i i 5 e$ 225 " :5 -'!5 i 5 E;d?.-i i Ii " '-i i i :QT?-1% -i Ii :'@ .,-c5 'i 3$ !@ i ;i " 'i i i i i i
;r .=;& =@ ; ,::% ?i :5 ;;2gi ==r
-==:ei sr gr asr sasr ti 1sr g< > * % @ ei g< t:i < si enr s*
-" " ==:i ~ . ;'-.+i j.." l " '-Y=z> --;=i " i s I" .Ii - -:--fl .r 3'=5 '.=== -;-=5 2.25 =" '--:
-.
i i i ;-3'-i ;" i 5 ' -I-'i i i " -:5 i -T-Ti i i i p-.-'-:3:---Ir i i -:5 -~ 32.-: 5 " " -.-'-.-:_. -.--I:-' :-::::' -i i i i i i i
-- .- -' -
==% i =.- r e .==-:;r i i g~ ;r -=* -i '.. > =- = .. -: < ' i i " -=- :=- -r .-.
'. . " ~ -=- =-==.- -+1-.% -" '5 ::;.. .= r i r -+B: .=i i '* ** -.* ;__.=;.='=" :;=.~ ._ I=--r r -=5 ,
,, * r -'~ .--_,- --:-:-..-:- - -.-_ - -.-'-.;. H . -.-: .- " " -pd i -=. ~ ~ '-i i
1- , , 1 * ; " " _..; .-. . -.- . ' " ;-' -,,-'\-i i gh _ -E,-13% . '< ;.-..5 ,5 . ." '
-' .-:-'= r
.-- - =
% s
we
T'P'
5 . . . - .- E: .5 1 ___:@ :i '-_;5 _ __,:_ _ +5 ,
I -1.1-'1-'1'
. '-
as . ..:-i i ? . .. . ..
H
=:" % @ ~ .. .- as ..-aw---r e
.. .
r % @
as sr e or $ - &
i > % -t-i s
Bear
ear .$ % ~ as $ 5
B
Fi g. 4.2-Pad-type tool separ ated fr omthe for mati on by
mudcake. |
Fi g. 4.3---Pad-type tool tr appi ng dr i l l i ng-mud pockets Inr u-
gose bor ehol e.
I __ __ _ __ _____
The r ange of cal i per measur ement i s then6 to 16 or 18 i n. The
pr essur e exer ted onthe pads i s l ow, so i nper meabl e zones, they
r i de over the mudcake. The l og r eadi ng i s thenthe hol e dr i l l ed di -
ameter mi nus twi ce the mudcake thi ckness.
The densi ty- and pad-type neutr ontool cal i per s ar e obtai ned fr om
anar mattached to the body of the tool (Fi g. 4.5 ) . The ar mi s pushed
har d agai nst the bor ehol e wal l to keep the tool i ngood contact wi th
the for mati on. The measur ed cal i per i s the di stance betweenthe
metal l i c ski d attached to the ar mand the tool face.
The r i gi d, r el ati vel y l ong tool cannot mor e i nand out of abor e-
hol e enl ar gement that i s shor ter thanthe tool l ength. The bor ehol e
r ugosi ty seenonthe l og r efl ects the path of the tool s extended ar m
ononl y one si de of the bor ehol e. The other si de i s bei ng smoothed
by the l onger tool . Because of the pr essur e exer ted onthe tool , the
ar mtends to cut thr ough the mudcake. The l og r eadi ng i s r oughl y
eq ual to the bor ehol e dr i l l ed di ameter mi nus one mudcake thi ckness
The soni c l og tool i s centr al i zed i nthe hol e wi th thr ee eq ual l y
spaced bow spr i ngs (Fi g. 4.6) . Hol e di ameter i s der i ved fr omthe
str etch of these thr ee ar ms, whi ch usual l y wor k together (i .e. , they
openand cl ose eq ual l y) .
Ani sotr opi c for mati onmechani cal pr oper ti es r esul t i nanoval or
egg-shaped cr oss secti on? Anenl ar ged bor ehol e usual l y assumes
Meosur ed Bor ehol e E
Cohper
/
/ _
\
< 9
#
$
Wol l
\\\\\\\\\\\\\}\\\\\\_\\\\\\\\\\'.
\Tool
Pods
\\T..\\'
& \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
\
as
'5
4\.\A\\*
\\\\
s
~ \
\s
* \\u\\\\
Measur ed Bor ehol e
C0 l i per
t - B h l 1"
j Bor ehol e % Mud Coke . i i l i i gi l oe Mud Coke
i I
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\i .H
i A\\\\\\\\\\\'
Ar m
Ski d '
Tool
___uq .__ _ T_'___ - _
Fi g. 4.4--Schemati c of mi cr or aei eti vi ty tog eai i per . cal i per .
- =--r i Fi g. 4.5 $ chemati c of densi ty and pad-type neutr on l og
MEASU REMENT ENVIRONMENT 63 I
Measured Borehole
Cohper
-.\\\\\\\\\a\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\w \1.\w\\
. ._\ s
\\ '
x\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\~ u - \\n\\\
iy Borehole
i Well _
\\\\
T Bowstring ..._ .
. I
Mud Coke t I
,_ Fig. 4.6 Sc' hematic of sonic log tool caliper.
a noncircular cross section. Because of the pressure exerted on the
pads, the tool rotates, seeking the position of least potential energy.
This is usually the long axis for an elliptical cross section of the
borehole (Fig. 4.7 ). Microresistivity, density, and neutron log
calipers generally measure the long axes of oval holes.
In an elliptical hole, a three-arm caliper, such as the sonic caliper,
most probably assumes one of the positions shown in Fig. 4.8 . The
indicated diameter is less than the maximum hole axis. In addition,
the reading is reduced by twice the mudcake thickness. Note that
the three dependent bow springs fail to centraliz e the tool properly
in a noncircular borehole.
The tool design and the borehole shape and rugosity determine
the calipers vertical and horiz ontal resolution. Different calipers
obtained in the same borehole yield different results. Fig. 4.9 com-
pares the microlog and a density log caliper. Major disagreements
are observed over Sections X and Y. Section X is a borehole en-
largement. U nable to t closely in this geometry, the density tool
smooths out one side of the hole. This results in a reading smaller
than that of the microlog. Section Y is a permeable interval that
exhibits mudcake buildup. The density-tool skid cuts through the
mudcake while the microlog pads ride over it. The microlog-caliper
reading is one mudcake thickness less than that of the density caliper.
Fig. 4.10 compares two calipers:one obtained by a two-arm pad
device (e. g. , a microlog) and the other by a three-arm bow-spring
device (a sonic log). The noncircular hole shape causes the marked
disagreement. The two-arm device reads the long axis of the oval
hole; the three-arm device reads the short axis.
A four-arm caliper gives a better denition of a noncircular bore-
hole. This tool conguration usually accompanies the dipmeter log
where denition of the borehole circumference is essential. The
four arm device has two independent two-arm calipers placed at
right angles. The tool provides two caliper logs. In circular bore-
holes, the two calipers are equal. They separate in noncircular holes
as one caliper reads the long axis and the other reads the short axis.
Fig. 4.11 shows an example of the four-arm caliper output. The
approximate borehole cross sections at Levels A, B, and C are also
shown.
Qualitative and quantitative information can be extracted from
the caliper reading. The borehole diameter or mudcake thickness
is needed when a correction for the effect of drilling fluids on log
measurements is warranted. The presence of mudcake itself is proof
of the presence of permeability. Mudcake buildup, borehole en-
-.L9-nq Axis
Short Axis
I Fig. 4.?--Schematic of elliptical borehole showing the prefer-
? ential position of a pad-type tool.
-- .:.. , \-nu-ulr-1 1_ _ ' _ .
Borehole Center
Borehole Center .
Fig. 4.8 Most probable positions assumed by a three-arm
caliper in an elliptical borehole (from Ref. 1).
largement, and borehole rugosity can be used with other log data
to mark changes in lithology. Proper evaluation of pad-type tools
(density or sidewall neutron) is enhanced by knowledge of the ex-
tent of the borehole rugosity.
In well-completion operations, the caliper log can help estimate
required cement volumes. It also helps select the optimum loca-
tion for packer seats. The caliper log is indispensable in dipmeter
interpretation because it provides the position of readings pickup
points on the dipping plane.
Example 4.1. Fig. 4.1215 shows an interval of a microcaliper (i.e. ,
a two-arm caliper measurement) that accompanies the microlog.
The interval logged consists of sands and shales. The vertical line
on the log represents the nominal borehole diameter, which is taken
to be the bit siz e.
a. What bit siz e was used to drill this hole?
b. Does the log show mudcake buildup? What is the thickness
of the permeable z one?
c. What is the best estimate of the mudcake thickness?
d. Does the log show severe borehole enlargement? What is the
maximum diameter recorded by the log?
e. What is the lithology in the enlarged interval?
f. What is the vertical resolution of this tool? I-low does it com-
pare with the pad length (about 6 in.)? H ow accurate is the thick-
ness value obtained in Part b?
L-_ _ _ _ - I
H
:-
|
l
r
-I
C
lic
k
t
o
b
u
y
N
O
W
! P
D
F
-
X
C
hange V
ie
w
e
r
w
w
w
. d
o
cu-trac
k
.
c
o
m
C
lic
k
t
o
b
u
y
N
O
W
! P
D
F
-
X
C
hange V
ie
w
e
r
w
w
w
. d
o
cu-trac
k
.
c
o
m
'l E.t'-'tSUFl EMENT ENVIRONMENT
, Measur ed Bor ehol e
I Cohper
-.\\\\\\\\ta\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\w \\\w\\
. ._\ s
\\ '
x\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\~ u - \\tt\\\
l g Bor ehol e
I Wal l _
\\\\
1 Bowstr i ng .....
,_ Fi g. 4.6Sc'hemati c at soni c l og tool cal i per .
anonci r cul ar cr oss secti on. Because of the pr essur e exer ted onthe
pads, the tool r otates, seeki ng the posi ti onof l east potenti al ener gy.
Thi s i s usual l y the l ong axi s for anel l i pti cal cr oss secti onof the
bor ehol e (Fi g. 4.7) . Mi cr or esi sti vi ty, densi ty, and neutr on l og
cal i per s gener al l y measur e the l ong axes of oval hol es.
Inanel l i pti cal hol e, athr ee-ar mcal i per , such as the soni c cal i per ,
most pr obabl y assumes one of the posi ti ons showni nFi g. 4.8. The
i ndi cated di ameter i s l ess thanthe maxi mumhol e axi s. Inaddi ti on,
the r eadi ng i s r educed by twi ce the mudcake thi ckness. Note that
the thr ee dependent bow spr i ngs fai l to centr al i ze the tool pr oper l y
i nanonci r cul ar bor ehol e.
The tool desi gnand the bor ehol e shape and r ugosi ty deter mi ne
the cal i per s ver ti cal and hor i zontal r esol uti on. D i ffer ent cal i per s
obtai ned i nthe same bor ehol e yi el d di ffer ent r esul ts. Fi g. 4.9 com-
par es the mi cr ol og and adensi ty l og cal i per . Major di sagr eements
ar e obser ved over Secti ons X and Y. Secti onX i s abor ehol e en-
l ar gement. Unabl e to t cl osel y i nthi s geometr y, the densi ty tool
smooths out one si de of the hol e. Thi s r esul ts i nar eadi ng smal l er
thanthat of the mi cr ol og. Secti onY i s aper meabl e i nter val that
exhi bi ts mudcake bui l dup. The densi ty-tool ski d cuts thr ough the
mudcake whi l e the mi cr ol og pads r i de over i t. The mi cr ol og-cal i per
r eadi ng i s one mudcake thi ckness l ess thanthat of the densi ty cal i per .
Fi g. 4.10 compar es two cal i per s:one obtai ned by atwo-ar mpad
devi ce (e. g. , ami cr ol og) and the other by athr ee-ar mbow-spr i ng
devi ce (asoni c l og) . The nonci r cul ar hol e shape causes the mar ked
di sagr eement. The two-ar mdevi ce r eads the l ong axi s of the oval
hol e; the thr ee-ar mdevi ce r eads the shor t axi s.
A four -ar mcal i per gi ves abetter defi ni ti onof anonci r cul ar bor e-
hol e. Thi s tool confi gur ati onusual l y accompani es the di pmeter l og
wher e deni ti onof the bor ehol e ci r cumfer ence i s essenti al . The
four -ar mdevi ce has two i ndependent two-ar mcal i per s pl aced at
r i ght angl es. The tool pr ovi des two cal i per l ogs. Inci r cul ar bor e-
hol es, the two cal i per s ar e eq ual . They separ ate i nnonci r cul ar hol es
as one cal i per r eads the l ong axi s and the other r eads the shor t axi s.
Fi g. 4.11 shows an exampl e of the four -ar mcal i per output. The
appr oxi mate bor ehol e cr oss secti ons at Level s A, B, and Car e al so
shown.
Qual i tati ve and q uanti tati ve i nfor mati oncanbe extr acted fr om
the cal i per r eadi ng. The bor ehol e di ameter or mudcake thi ckness
i s needed whenacor r ecti onfor the effect of dr i l l i ng ui ds onl og
measur ements i s war r anted. The pr esence of mudcake i tsel f i s pr oof
of the pr esence of per meabi l i ty. Mudcake bui l dup, bor ehol e en-
. I
Shor t Axi s
I Fi g. 4.?--Schemati c of el l i pti cal bor ehol e showi ng the pr efer -
? enti al posi ti onat apad-type tool .
Bor ehol e Center
Bor ehol e Center
Fi g. 4.8Most pr obabl e posi ti ons assumed by a
cal i per i nanel l i pti cal bor ehol e (fr omRel . 1) .
l ar gement, and bor ehol e r ugosi ty canbe used wi th other l og data
to mar k changes i nl i thol ogy. Pr oper eval uati onof pad-type tool s
(densi ty or si dewal l neutr on) i s enhanced by knowl edge of the ex-
tent of the bor ehol e r ugosi ty.
Inwel l -compl eti onoper ati ons, the cal i per l og canhel p esti mate
r eq ui r ed cement vol umes. It al so hel ps sel ect the opti muml oca-
ti onfor packer seats. The cal i per l og i s i ndi spensabl e i ndi pmeter
i nter pr etati onbecause i t pr ovi des the posi ti onof r eadi ngs pi ckup
poi nts onthe di ppi ng pl ane.
Exampl e 4.1. Fi g. 4.1215 shows ani nter val of ami cr ocal i per (i .e. ,
atwo-ar mcal i per measur ement) that accompani es the mi cr ol og.
The i nter val l ogged consi sts of sands and shal es. The ver ti cal l i ne
onthe l og r epr esents the nomi nal bor ehol e di ameter , whi ch i s taken
to be the bi t si ze.
a. What bi t si ze was used to dr i l l thi s hol e?
b. D oes the l og show mudcake bui l dup? What i s the thi ckness
of the per meabl e zone?
c. What i s the best esti mate of the mudcake thi ckness?
d. D oes the l og show sever e bor ehol e enl ar gement? What i s the
maxi mumdi ameter r ecor ded by the l og?
e. What i s the l i thol ogy i n the enl ar ged i nter val ?
f. What i s the ver ti cal r esol uti onof thi s tool ? I-l ow does i t cor n-
par e wi th the pad l ength (about 6 i n.) ? How accur ate i s the thi ck-
ness val ue obtai ned i nPar t b?
L-__ _ _ - I
|
H
:-
|
l
r
-
64 TH EOFIY, MEASU REMENT, AND INTERPRETATION OF WELL LOGS
H OLE DIAMETER {inches}
0
an
.
' i
-_ I I
I I : : 1i
I-. -
. i -""
_ _ ._ _ ._ 1% ?-5 .-
|; I
.. ii7 .a l.fi Q
I |- | i.
_ _ ._ _ -r-l' -|--~ }- ' ~ _ -
' ii i . i' : _ _ _ i'I--| ii it-
an
z sse - - -L , -
-no -=.lll.-. _ .1
_ _ ._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
I
l
"' ,;_ ' Int-an
_ _ _ -.-_ -
._ _ _ -
I
4
SECTION
DEPTH
ll* *
p:.ru- roused
EI 5 15 i = hill:iiiiiii _ jL - E:
II
I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Two Arm Low Pressure
' - " _ Pad Caliper lldicraloql
---' One arm H igh Pressure
Caliper {Density Lcql
z saa -- -
' - - s - .
._ _ . _
' -Z
_ _ I -
_ , pp i SECTION
r Y
15 . _ _ _ _ _ ,H _ _ ; _ .
-
""* i T
Fig. 4.9--Comparison ct micralag caliper and density caliper
(tram Ftef. 2).
I -, iiiii i ii
H OLE DIAMETER [ inches]
U h | i
T _ i_
I. | ic--I
El
H H EH I-H - i
5 000
I-I-@:=H _ -
I
d
1 I I
' 2:.
' 1' ]
I I
.. a_ _
-.. --1'
3 -it
. -5
' .3
as
Q _
==..":"' -1' -' ~ ="- -===
4
I - H i
:-_ I' i]j_ ' ;|_ ---"- _ -
--TE-III
; I
I
iiiiiFl I111
II _ .
DEPTH
, .
I
' I
CALIPERS
~ i Two Arm Pad
- -- Three Arm Bow Spring
H er ;r . Q;
irtwtttt
-if '5 %
1&2:
' --e=
-_ F :-.5 -I-ii2:_
E}. -= -_ _ .
II,11_ 1f1
. i |' I |_
I
ii
-l.
_ - _ _ _ _ . _ _ :_ - -- rt-i
Fig. 4.1 B Compariean of two-arm and three-arm bow-spring
calipers (from Ref. 2). _ i
g. U sing log information, can you guess the tool diameter in the
collapsed position?
Solution. Fig. 4.12B illustrates the answers to the above
questions.
a. The vertical line indicates that a 6% -in. bit was used to drill
this hole.
b. Yes, the actual hole diameter between 10,494 and 10,5 3 3 ft
is less than the bit siz e. This indicates that there is mudeake build-
up against a 3 9-ft permeable z one.
c. Two-arm pad-type calipers read the actual hole diameter mi-
nus twice the mudcake thickness, hm. -The caliper reads 6-in. , so
2h,,,,_ ._ .=6% 6=% in. and h,,,,_ .=3 / 3 in.
The calculation of a :7 3 -in. mudcake thickness assumes that the
hole was drilled to gauge. If the drilled-hole diameter is larger than
the bit siz e to start with, 5 / 3 in. is the minimum thickness value.
Note that if the drilled-hole diameter is considerably larger than
the bit siz e, mudcake buildup can go undetected.
d. The log shows a severe borehole enlargement in the interval
of 10,449 to 10,48 4 ft. The maximum recorded diameter is 11%
in., indicating a 5 -in. borehole enlargement.
e. Because, as stated, only sands and shales are present in the
interval shown in Fig. 4.12A, the lithology in the enlarged inter-
val is shale.
f. The log shows diameter variation over thin z ones xi to 1 ft.
thick. The tools vertical resolution is then on the same order of
magnitude as the pad length. Thus, the estimated permeable-z one
thickness of 3 9 ft in Part B is a very good estimate.
g. From Fig. 4. 12B, the pads rst established contact with the
borehole wall at 10,5 98 ft. The tool reading below that depth cor-
responds to the collapsed position of the tool. It is about 5 .4 in.
4.3 lltlud, Mud-Flltrata, and lllludcake Properties
Well-logging tools are usually run in boreholes filled with a drill-
ing fluid. Possible drilling uids are air, water, or a slurry made
up of liquid and solid phases. Slurries, the most frequently used
drilling uid, are called drilling muds. The principal functions of
drilling muds are to remove the drilled solids (i.e., cuttings), to
prevent formation uids from owing into the borehole, to pre-
vent the borehole walls from caving, and to cool the bit. Drilling
mud also plays an important role in logging operations, especially
electric logging. In effect, a conductive drilling mud is needed to
provide electric continuity between the electric electrode-type tools
and the formation.
The drilling mud affects, generally adversely, the response of
logging tools, depending on its type and properties. Water-based
mud is the most common type. It is made of a continuous liquid
phase of water in which clay or clay-like material is in suspension.
Barite is usually added to increase mud density. Chemicals are also
added to control the rheological properties of the uid. The water
used to mix the mud is usually fresh. Some drilling applications
however, call for salt water.
The water is usually replaced by liquid hydrocarbons for hot,
deep formations, water-soluble formations, and water-sensitive
potential producing formations. This type of mud is known as oil-
based mud because the liquid phase consists of diesel, weathered
etude, rened, or mineral oil. Oil-based muds are nonconductive
and limit the use of resistivity logs to induction-type devices. It is
generally accepted that oil-based mud minimiz es borehole environ-
mental effects. Recent studies3 show, however, that this is not al-
ways the ease. As the use of oil-based muds increases, our
understanding of their effect on the logging environment improves.
C
lic
k
t
o
b
u
y
N
O
W
! P
D
F
-
X
C
hange V
ie
w
e
r
w
w
w
. d
o
cu-trac
k
.
c
o
m
C
lic
k
t
o
b
u
y
N
O
W
! P
D
F
-
X
C
hange V
ie
w
e
r
w
w
w
. d
o
cu-trac
k
.
c
o
m
THEORY, MEASUREMENT, AND INTERPRETATION OF WEL
HOLE D IAMETER {i nches}
Ol -
.
' i
-_I I
I
E: 1i
I... -
. i -" "
__.__._ l ._.i -5 .-
| ; I
..| .i E.=:l .f.:
I | - | i .
__.__-.--_'.l _| -.-~ ;;-_'._-
'5 ! 1 i . :'
.__
. I" 2l ';... :'2- _.
Oh
i i ai i gki i l
zsea - - -L , -
_ ._-_
__.__ __ __ _ _
I
l
" ',;_' Int-an
_-_ L.__-
._ _ _ -
I
4
SECTION
D E PTH
i r a+
p:.;v- r eeves
I= i i i i JL - i i
II
I __ ___ ___ Two Ar mLaw Pr essur e
' - --- " --- _ Pod Cal i per i l sl i cr oi oq l
---' One ar mHi gh Pr essur e
Cal i per {D ensi ty Loal
zsaa l - -
'- - i t - .
.__. _
'-Z
__ I -
_, pp i SECTION
r v
15 . ____ _,H__; _.
-
FTFT
~ ve I
Fi g. 4.9 --Compar i sonat mi cr ol og cal i per and densi ty cal i per
(fr omFi ef. 2) .
X
-0-
HOLE D IAMETER [ i nches]
Uh | i
T _i _
I. | i o--I
El
i -s- aeT5 Li
- | ..
" -1
._ ..|
i -.
. F
' .3
as
Q_ e
==..." :" '-1'-'~ =" - -===
4
I - Hi
:-_I'i ]j_';| _---" - _-
--OI-III J
; I
l
i i i i i Fl I111
II..
D EPTH
,, .
I
' I
CALIPERS
~ i Two Ar mPod
-- Thr ee Ar mBow Spr i ng
twv ;r .
i ui hmad
I i E E. I
-i f i5 %
-has
'--s=
1.. R = -__ '. _
an
_,T-1-
- i | ' '| _
I
i i i
-I.
Fi g. 4.1BCompar i sonof two-ar mand thr ee-ar mbow-spr i ng ?
l .. I
Hl i i l i l i l i
IIIIIS--III
sane 1.
I I |
Y a
" 1
t E
_ . .__. . .:.--- Tl -i
cal i per s (fr omRef. 2) . _ i
g. Usi ng l og i nfor mati on, canyou guess the tool di ameter i nthe
col l apsed posi ti on?
Sol uti on. Fi g. 4.12B i l l ustr ates the answer s to the above
q uesti ons.
a. The ver ti cal l i ne i ndi cates that a6% -i n. bi t was used to dr i l l
thi s hol e.
b. Yes, the actual hol e di ameter between 10,49 4 and 10,5 33 ft
i s l ess thanthe bi t si ze. Thi s i ndi cates that ther e i s mudcake bui l d-
up agai nst a39 -ft per meabl e zone.
c. Two-ar mpad-type cal i per s r ead the actual hol e di ameter mi -
nus twi ce the mudcake thi ckness, hm. -The cal i per r eads 6-i n. , so
2h,,,,_._.=6% 6=% i n. and h,,,,_.=3/ 3 i n.
The cal cul ati onof a:73-i n. mudcake thi ckness assumes that the
hol e was dr i l l ed to gauge. If the dr i l l ed-hol e di ameter i s l ar ger than
the bi t si ze to star t wi th, 5 / 3 i n. i s the mi ni mumthi ckness val ue.
Note that i f the dr i l l ed-hol e di ameter i s consi der abl y l ar ger than
the bi t si ze, mudcake bui l dup cango undetected.
d. The l og shows asever e bor ehol e enl ar gement i nthe i nter val
of 10,449 to 10,484 ft. The maxi mumr ecor ded di ameter i s 11%
i n., i ndi cati ng a5 -i n. bor ehol e enl ar gement.
e. Because, as stated, onl y sands and shal es ar e pr esent i nthe
i nter val showni nFi g. 4.l 2A, the l i thol ogy i nthe enl ar ged i nter -
val i s shal e.
f. The l og shows di ameter var i ati onover thi nzones i d to 1 ft.
thi ck. The tool s ver ti cal r esol uti on i s thenonthe same or der of
magni tude as the pad l ength. Thus, the esti mated per meabl e-zone
thi ckness of 39 ft i nPar t B i s aver y good esti mate.
g. Fr omFi g. 4. 12B, the pads r st establ i shed contact wi th the
bor ehol e wal l at 10,5 9 8 ft. The tool r eadi ng bel ow that depth cor -
r esponds to the col l apsed posi ti onof the tool . It i s about 5 .4 i n.
4.3 l l l l ud, Mud-Fi l tr ata, and l l l l udcake Pr oper ti es
Wel l -l oggi ng tool s ar e usual l y r uni nbor ehol es fi l l ed wi th adr i l l -
i ng fl ui d. Possi bl e dr i l l i ng ui ds ar e ai r , water , or asl ur r y made
up of l i q ui d and sol i d phases. Sl ur r i cs, the most fr eq uentl y used
dr i l l i ng ui d, ar e cal l ed dr i l l i ng muds. The pr i nci pal functi ons of
dr i l l i ng muds ar e to r emove the dr i l l ed sol i ds (i .e., cutti ngs) , to
pr event for mati onui ds fr omowi ng i nto the bor ehol e, to pr e-
vent the bor ehol e wal l s fr omcavi ng, and to cool the bi t. D r i l l i ng
mud al so pl ays ani mpor tant r ol e i nl oggi ng oper ati ons, especi al l y
el ectr i c l oggi ng. Ineffect, aconducti ve dr i l l i ng mud i s needed to
pr ovi de el ectr i c conti nui ty betweenthe el ectr i c el ectr ode-type tool s
and the for mati on.
The dr i l l i ng mud affects, gener al l y adver sel y, the r esponse of
l oggi ng tool s, dependi ng oni ts type and pr oper ti es. Water -based
mud i s the most commontype. It i s made of aconti nuous l i q ui d
phase of water i nwhi ch cl ay or cl ay-l i ke mater i al i s i nsuspensi on.
Bar i te i s usual l y added to i ncr ease mud densi ty. Chemi cal s ar e al so
added to contr ol the r heol ogi cal pr oper ti es of the ui d. The water
used to mi x the mud i s usual l y fr esh. Some dr i l l i ng appl i cati ons
however , cal l for sal t water .
The water i s usual l y r epl aced by l i q ui d hydr ocar bons for hot,
deep for mati ons, water -sol ubl e for mati ons, and water -sensi ti ve
potenti al pr oduci ng for mati ons. Thi s type of mud i s knownas oi l -
based mud because the l i q ui d phase consi sts of di esel , weather ed
cr ude, r ened, or mi ner al oi l . Oi l -based muds ar e nonconducti ve
and l i mi t the use of r esi sti vi ty l ogs to i nducti on-type devi ces. It i s
gener al l y accepted that oi l -based mud mi ni mi zes bor ehol e envi r on-
mental effects. Recent studi es3 show, however , that thi s i s not al -
ways the case. As the use of oi l -based muds i ncr eases, our
under standi ng of thei r effect onthe l oggi ng envi r onment i mpr oves.
l
E
i
I
1
* --._ _ .
MEASU FIEMENT ENVIRONMENT
H OLE DIAMETER A
5 {inches} 1,5
E
< 1
-t
2
E
Iii-ii
"-' ll ' _ " th|~ n' i*
kn-"kl-i
in _ |I-an-|_ _ |
)-
I
I
I-wf an-ilk. "' 5 '
Il\
E
U 5
F)
C !
Fig. 4.11 Examp|e of four-arm caliper output (from Ref. 2).
The rest of this section focuses on the more common water-based
mud. As mentioned, the drilling mud ows into a permeable for-
mation because of a pressure differential between the wellbore and
the formation. Large particles relative to pore siz e are screened
out and coat the formation face with a mudcake. The liquid phase
that invades the formation is called the mud ltrate. As Fig. 4.13
illustrates, the mud, mudcake, the z one of the formation invaded
by mud ltrate, and the uninvaded z one of the formation contrib-
ute to the tool measurement. In addition to the properties of the
formation of interest, the tool response is affected by mud, mud-
cake, and mud-ltrate properties. The degree of these effects de-
pends on the tool design, physical properties of the z ones involved,
borehole siz e, mudcake thickness, and depth of invasion.
65
Drilling-mud data pertinent to logging operations are type; den-
sity; viscosity; pH ; uid loss; and mud, mudcake, and mud-ltrate
resistivities.
4.3 .1 Mud Type. Water-based muds usually are chemically treat-
ed and are designed according to the type of treatment. Commonly
used muds can be classied as (1) natural muds (untreated), (2)
phosphate muds, (3 ) organically treated muds (lignate, quebracho,
and chrome lignosulfonates), (4) calcium-treated muds (lime, cal-
cium chloride, and gypsum), (5 ) saltwater muds (seawater and satu-
rated saltwater muds), and (6) oil-emulsion muds (oil-in-water).
The mud type reects the predominant elements in the mud. Know-
ing the mud type aids in the analysis of nuclear logs because their
response is affected by the atomic composition of the surrounding
medium.
4.3 .2 Density. In eld work, mud density is called mud weight.
It is expressed in eld units of pounds per gallon. It is also referred
to in terms of its pressure gradient, which is expressed in pounds
per square inch per foot. The mud balance generally is used to meas-
ure mud density.5 The mud density affects the ltration process
because it reects the solid content of the mud. It also determines
the magnitude of the pressure differential between the mud and the
formation, which in turn determines the severity of mud-ltrate in-
vasion. The response of gamma ray devices (gamma-ray logs, den-
sity logs) depends on the mud density because the attenuation of
gamma rays depends heavily on the density of the surrounding
medium.
4.3 .3 Viscosity. A relative measure of mud viscosity is easily ob-
tained on the rig with the Marsh funnel. The Marsh funnel viscosi-
ty is the time in seconds needed for 1 qt of mud to ow through
the funne1.5 For reference, the Marsh funnel viscosity of fresh
water is about 26 seconds at 7 0F.
Viscosity is an indicator of mud quality, or solid content. H ow-
ever, no strong relationship exists between mud viscosity and other
mud parameters, like ltration, that are pertinent to logging oper-
ations.
4.3 .4 pl-I. The pH , which is the abbreviation for potential hydro-
gen ion, reects the relative acidity or alkalinity of mud. pl-I values
range from 0 to 14. Pure water, which is neutral (not acidic or alka-
line) has a pH of T. pl-I values less than 7 indicate acidity, and values
greater than 7 indicate alkalinity. The pH reflects mud chemical
quality and is used for mud quality control. In log interpretation,
it can be used to indicate qualitatively the presence of certain ions.
For example, -mud alkalinity usually results from the presence of
bicarbonates (H CO3 ), carbonates (CO3 ), and hydroxyls (OH ).
Knowledge of mud ionic composition is important in some log anal-
yses [ e.g., the self-potential (SP) log].
Mud pH is determined by the use of paper test strips. The paper
strip, which is impregnated with dyes sensitive to the solution pH ,
is wetted by the mud liquid phase. The color of the wet paper is
compared with a standard color chart to determine the pH value.
pH values can also be determined by use of a glass-electrode pH
meter.5
4.3 .5 Fluid Loss. Fluid loss is a measure of the relative amount
of ltrate lost during ltration. It qualitatively indicates the rela-
tive severity of mud-ltrate invasion into a permeable formation.
Fluid loss is determined with a lter press. A representative mud
sample, usually obtained from the return owline, is poured into
a mud cell with a standard lter paper at its bottom. A 100-psi pres-
sure differentiai is applied for 3 0 minutes. The uid loss is the
amount of ltrate measured in cubic centimeters that collects in
a graduated cylinder during those 3 0 minutes.5 The amount of
fluid loss is very useful for mud conditioning, but might not ac-
curately represent ltration under dynamic conditions.5
A sample of the mud, mud ltrate, and mudcake deposited on
the lter paper is usually retained for resistivity measurements.
C
lic
k
t
o
b
u
y
N
O
W
! P
D
F
-
X
C
hange V
ie
w
e
r
w
w
w
. d
o
cu-trac
k
.
c
o
m
C
lic
k
t
o
b
u
y
N
O
W
! P
D
F
-
X
C
hange V
ie
w
e
r
w
w
w
. d
o
cu-trac
k
.
c
o
m
E
I
I
1
* --.__.
MEASUREMENT ENVIRONMENT
I
HOLE D IAMETER A
5 {i nches} 1,5
i n
< 1
t.
2
E
-It-+'-" -- -..s-uh-_"
_IIIH_ __ I__
kl -Ih% ,,i ,-
P
III
I
I
I-wf an-i l k. " 5 '
" '* " \| '\-" '1
It .r r
\.;-1... i ___,,\u- I!-I I!-\ \\
\-K
(" 1 on
O
Fi g. 4.11Exampl e of four -ar mcal i per output (fr omFi ef. 2) .
The r est of thi s secti onfocuses onthe mor e commonwater -based
mud. As menti oned, the dr i l l i ng mud ows i nto aper meabl e for -
mati onbecause of apr essur e di ffer enti al betweenthe wel l bor e and
the for mati on. Lar ge par ti cl es r el ati ve to por e si ze ar e scr eened
out and coat the for mati onface wi th amudcake. The l i q ui d phase
that i nvades the for mati oni s cal l ed the mud l tr ate. As Fi g. 4.13
i l l ustr ates, the mud, mudcake, the zone of the for mati oni nvaded
by mud l tr ate, and the uni nvaded zone of the for mati oncontr i b-
ute to the tool measur ement. Inaddi ti onto the pr oper ti es of the
for mati onof i nter est, the tool r esponse i s affected by mud, mud-
cake, and mud-l tr ate pr oper ti es. The degr ee of these effects de-
pends onthe tool desi gn, physi cal pr oper ti es of the zones i nvol ved,
bor ehol e si ze, mudcake thi ckness, and depth of i nvasi on.
D r i l l i ng-mud dataper ti nent to l oggi ng oper ati ons ar r .
si ty; vi scosi ty; pH; ui d l oss; and mud, mudcake, and In
r esi sti vi ti es.
4.3.1Mud Type. Water -based muds usual l y ar e chemi cal l y tr eat-
ed and ar e desi gned accor di ng to the type of tr eatment. Commonl y
used muds canbe cl assi ed as (1) natur al muds (untr eated) , (2)
phosphate muds, (3) or gani cal l y tr eated muds (l i gnate, q uebr acho,
and chr ome l i gnosul fonates) , (4) cal ci um-tr eated muds (l i me, cal -
ci umchl or i de, and gypsum) , (5 ) sal twater muds (seawater and satu-
r ated sal twater muds) , and (6) oi l -emul si onmuds (oi l -i n-water ) .
The mud type r eects the pr edomi nant el ements i nthe mud. Know-
i ng the mud type ai ds i nthe anal ysi s of nucl ear l ogs because thei r
r esponse i s affected by the atomi c composi ti onof the sur r oundi ng
medi um.
4.3.2 D ensi ty. Inel d wor k, mud densi ty i s cal l ed mud wei ght.
It i s expr essed i nel d uni ts of pounds per gal l on. It i s al so r efer r ed
to i nter ms of i ts pr essur e gr adi ent, whi ch i s expr essed i npounds
per sq uar e i nch per foot. The mud bal ance gener al l y i s used to meas-
ur e mud densi ty.5 The mud densi ty affects the l tr ati onpr ocess
because i t r efl ects the sol i d content of the mud. It al so deter mi nes
the magni tude of the pr essur e di ffer enti al betweenthe mud and the
for mati on, whi ch i ntur ndeter mi nes the sever i ty of mud-l tr ate i n-
vasi on. The r esponse of gammar ay devi ces (gamma-r ay l ogs, den-
si ty l ogs) depends onthe mud densi ty because the attenuati onof
gammar ays depends heavi l y on the densi ty of the sur r oundi ng
medi um.
4.3.3 Vi scosi ty. A r el ati ve measur e of mud vi scosi ty i s easi l y ob-
tai ned onthe r i g wi th the Mar sh funnel . The Mar sh funnel vi scosi -
ty i s the ti me i nseconds needed for 1 q t of mud to ow thr ough
the funnel .5 For r efer ence, the Mar sh funnel vi scosi ty of fr esh
water i s about 26 seconds at 70F.
Vi scosi ty i s ani ndi cator of mud q ual i ty, or sol i d content. How-
ever , no str ong r el ati onshi p exi sts betweenmud vi scosi ty and other
mud par ameter s, l i ke l tr ati on, that ar e per ti nent to l oggi ng oper -
ati ons.
4.3.4 pl -I. The pH, whi ch i s the abbr evi ati onfor potenti al hydr o-
geni on, r eects the r el ati ve aci di ty or al kal i ni ty of mud. pl -Ival ues
r ange fr om0 to 14. Pur e water , whi ch i s neutr al (not aci di c or al ka-
l i ne) has apHof T. pl -I val ues l ess than7 i ndi cate aci di ty, and val ues
gr eater than7 i ndi cate al kal i ni ty. The pH r efl ects mud chemi cal
q ual i ty and i s used for mud q ual i ty contr ol . Inl og i nter pr etati on,
i t canbe used to i ndi cate q ual i tati vel y the pr esence of cer tai ni ons.
For exampl e, -mud al kal i -ni ty usual l y r esul ts fr omthe pr esence of
bi car bonates (HCO3) , car bonates (CO3) , and hydr oxyl s (D H) .
Knowl edge of mud i oni c composi ti oni s i mpor tant i nsome l og anal -
yses [ e.g., the sel f-potenti al (SP) l og].
Mud pHi s deter mi ned by the use of paper test str i ps. The paper
str i p, whi ch i s i mpr egnated wi th dyes sensi ti ve to the sol uti onpH,
i s wetted by the mud l i q ui d phase. The col or of the wet paper i s
compar ed wi th astandar d col or char t to deter mi ne the pHval ue.
pl -I val ues canal so be deter mi ned by use of agl ass-el ectr ode pH
meter .5
4.3.5 Fl ui d Loss. Fl ui d l oss i s ameasur e of the r el ati ve amount
of l tr ate l ost dur i ng l tr ati on. It q ual i tati vel y i ndi cates the r el a-
ti ve sever i ty of mud-l tr ate i nvasi oni nto aper meabl e for mati on.
Fl ui d l oss i s deter mi ned wi th al ter pr ess. A r epr esentati ve mud
sampl e, usual l y obtai ned fr omthe r etur nowl i ne, i s pour ed i nto
amud cel l wi th astandar d l ter paper at i ts bottom. A 100-psi pr es-
sur e di ffer enti al i s appl i ed for 30 mi nutes. The ui d l oss i s the
amount of l tr ate measur ed i n cubi c centi meter s that col l ects i n
agr aduated cyl i nder dur i ng those 30 mi nutes.5 The amount of
fl ui d l oss i s ver y useful for mud condi ti oni ng, but mi ght not ac-
cur atel y r epr esent l tr ati onunder dynami c condi ti ons
A sampl e of the mud, mud l tr ate, and mudcake deposi ted on
the l ter paper i s usual l y r etai ned for r esi sti vi ty measur ements.
66 TH EORY, MEASU REMENT. AND INTERPRETATION OF WELL LOGS
_ _ _ _ _ :illI;lg! ! i! lIIII=%
i~ |"i"* T"I$lnm""' 1rr" ..- uniinlnlI|l|nundi,' "
ululllrnllllgpplmlnl
lH EH H ::hH bd:ElH :H nun
i -u- 1-1
_ _ _ pu|-u---- _ ._ .._ ._ - .._ ._ ... _
-1-
Z --r d--- + 0--_ -v --1
_ -- -1. _ _ _ .,
--
11.-sq,
of severe
borehole
enlargement
_ |_ T;' - _ ._ ,
. I ,
-0------_
-a--_ - --
-u-n- + 1
- ---- |
_ ._ . I
. _ 3 IF
8 |-.
_ . _ .._ ._ D I
e L Mud cm <
lif-
_ l
---- -- 1--
? -- .-< : - budup
Section L
|| i Ilnnllluly
in niit."iliiI L
mun
-|-no -----v ---1 H 1 .-_ ;
--- i. _ _ _ .. .-qq.
. .;::; -1- -. -|---- -----
_ n-n--_ -
.- _ _ _ _ _
- I ' I ' 1
-F _
1 " . _ if
|_ _ _ 1:1. ;; -|-It-. -; _ |.. _ .. 1
. -. .. .:_ -.-_ : 11- .- - ..,.
_ _ _ I|$|||:
Kendal
T T position
E
s
D
L Bit siz e
. "_ ' -I 63 0 .
' 4
i
- H ole Diameter in Inches
MlCROCAl.l' PER
5 H .I.dEl
I. _ ._ _ .:- .;t 1: Red i "(J Will! :1 2"-_ _ 1-
-- tool in collapse "" rt 1*
5 | 5 l
._ .t_ ...+ ..=|-_ }-- - t t p-=._ | | ' | I | I i F -l -'
MIIRU CALIPER E
a b
-' . -- _ .-: | --0-. I
--H . -||
_ l_ l_ l_ I_ ylI_ _ $IlIIll
IlIIImBi"n""illll' iE::I
H IIIIIIIIW
ml
LE! -lllll
lmllli vlll
i |_ "* ' - -+ .-- Z ..,,.
--Ii
i _ .-.,,,.
~ ;- Thin Z ones
-_ ....
-i --_ ._ _ ,,.
i _ _ _ . _ _ _ ..-
W
1&1 it-7 1 I-Ilia
q,-_
._ , it L _ _ _ _ _ _ E
"" D
-1.. I' \||- .-
,, -
i .|-I... .--- .- 1. ..
J _ _ _ _ -. -
.:' _ ' _ ' _ I' ll _ _ _ _ _ -
|' .-.-_ _ _ _ _ . .-,,,. I ,_ -II
A _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
i:I.._ _ _ _ _ _ -
_ _ _ ._ _ . --. - -.5 vi
_ ,,_ . T _ T' ; -_ % _ _ _ -_ -;. - . :- --
-' i _ -;- _ - - - -.-.- .--~ .|.|- i
- - _ - --.. -- _ - - --\- - -
_ _ _ _ _
t_ _ | _
ll-"I ' _ ;:
P:-I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
l
_ ._ - |.l
.| |- }. ,.
,.
||-.
|
.:;1-- --1 --.-- _ _ .|_ .|.. '
"ii!
2a_ g||
lllmnllll ti llll Ill! Iii
I
- ......_ _ |
._ .. ..-_ _ _ _
_ El
c . -_ ..' _ 3
er
Z H ole Diameter in Inches
i Fig. 4.12-rvtiorocaliper of Example 4.1.
4.3 .6 Mud, Mud-Filtrate, and Mudcake Resistivities. Mud, mud-
filtrate, and mudcake resistivities R,,,, Rmf, and Rm,
respectively are the drilling-uid properties most pertinent to log
analyses, primarily because electric properties of the mud differ
drastically from these of the formation and formation uids, which
causes a considerable resistivity contrast between the borehole medi-
um and the rock. This contrast controls the log quality. The value
of Rm, is needed to remove the borehole signal from the total tool
response. Nuclear and acoustic properties of the borehole medium
also differ from formation properties. Nuclear and acoustic log-
ging devices, however, were designed with knowledge gained from
earlier electric tools. They were designed to minimiz e the effect
of mud and mudcake on the tool response. The effect of mud and
mudcake is also removed (compensated for) automatically.
The contrast of chemical activities between mud ltrate and for-
mation water originates and determines the magnitude of the SP
measured in logging operations.
Mud, mud filtrate, and mudcake samples, collected in conjunc-
tion with lter-press tests, are placed successively in a resistivity
meter, which provides a direct resistivity reading. The temperature
of the sample has to be measured because resistivity is strongly de-
pendent on temperature. Rm and Rmf values provided by the meter
are usually representative, especially if the measurement procedure
recommended by API5 is followed. R,,,_ ,_ . values are usually suspect
C
lic
k
t
o
b
u
y
N
O
W
! P
D
F
-
X
C
hange V
ie
w
e
r
w
w
w
. d
o
cu-trac
k
.
c
o
m
C
lic
k
t
o
b
u
y
N
O
W
! P
D
F
-
X
C
hange V
ie
w
e
r
w
w
w
. d
o
cu-trac
k
.
c
o
m
THEORY, MEASUREMENT, AND INTERPRETATION OF WEL'
_____:i l l I;l g!!i !l IIII=%
I | " i " * T" I$ l nn" " '1tr " ... undi i el nl I| l | nuudi ,'"
ul ul l l r nl l l l ggpl ul ni
IEHE::hEhhf:ggHh:HTnan
i -u- 1-1
___ pu| -u---- _._ .._._- .._._... _
Sdr ce I--Rmf Rmg
...,...i
- R... @ BHT y I i i
_. .-i f
@ :
~ 5 -
Ti me Si nce Ci r c
Max. Rec. Temp. ' T
I a
" " " " " q F I" -' ' ,5 -Fi r E
E!
Q
:-:q ui It i I;uet1ta. i f E: e s ; ,
Her
Recor ded By
Pi
s
W1tnesse'dBy 0 I T i t " B
Fi g. 4.35 --Standar d l og headi ng tor el ectr i c l ogs r ecommended by the APl (fr om 25 ) .
Fed
i n. In1 i *
20. Ti me (i nhour s) el apsed betweenthe end of mud ci r cul ati on
befor e l oggi ng and when the l oggi ng tool r eached bottom.
21. The temper atur e i ndi cated by the maxi mum-r ecor di ng ther -
mometer used dur i ng the r un.
22. The l oggi ng tr uck or eq ui pment number and the tr ucl -< s base
of oper ati on.
23. The names of the l oggi ng company and oper ati ng company
r epr esentati ves. The l oggi ng company r epr esentati ve i s i nchar ge
of the l oggi ng oper ati ons. The oper ati ng company r epr esentati ve
wi tnesses the l oggi ng oper ati onto ensur e that the l oggi ng pr ogr am
i s executed accor di ng to company pl anand that l og q ual i ty meets
company standar ds.
' _ ' _ i_ iE;i@_ I}4eas._ Te,rfu- U ' ' U
.. Rn... @Mess. Temp.
J-._ _ S1Jl1_ l' _ B_ i_ _ _ niil_ gfp1fa....i"f if H 3 3 3 if T if 0 T* * * * T
:5 Rm:@BH T
MEASU REMENT ENU IH ONMENT 3 1
rjsla H ere _ _ __ _ ' _ IE_ H ea-dine and Les 0@n wa1_ _ Tg.4PI.R.P. 3 1 -P . _ _ _ _ .
REMARKS . _ ..at a ~ 9 =--;; 9 at ~ ~ j_
Changes-in Mud TYH 1-l| Ei or additional sanples u Ssaplpsbgssss T l _ ,
~ s...|s.....N..:: 6 6 6 at-engage: we -saI@pvH 1e .s=@! sMas
ype' F1uia"1Y1' H EiB Q _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ .._ _ ._ _ _ ,_ ----- _ _ _ _
Dens. Vise. _ _ _ _ _ ,. _ _ _
sat 6| eases .|, to ms | w;_ _ , L _ ' . _ ."' ' _ ' " _ 1i".T_ _ T_ ' IU I lI(' ' ' I _ _
l ~ -* : F- l ea.
Rm @Mesa. Temp. @
ha
@
_ . Bun No. _ _ _ _ _ _ Tool TYp_ e_ _ _ _ _ Pad Type_ _ Too_ l_ _ Bos1tron_ _ l_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ er:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
@
Q _ _
@. re
s
R... @_ _ BH ' f l _ _ _ _ _ _
4
re
at
see
at
re
Rm:@BI-IT
F l.
F -p"* """""""-ii-""* "r"""
i _ _ _ pf 1 m l ' j DIIU IIH if ' I I.PIII"' _ K_ ' _ | T
I
l_ EEEE - 0 - -- -_ _ _
Fig. 4.3 6 -Second fold of the log heading showing the remarks section.
Space is provided for remarks on the second fold of the log. The
Remarks section in Fig. 4.3 6 includes (a) general remarks; (b) mud
data for two additional samples for the particular log run; (c) scale
changes if made during logging; (d) and detailed equipment data,
including tool type, pad type, and tool eccentricity.
Recent log headings are generated by computer. A computer-
generated well heading looks different from that shown in Fig. 4.3 5
because the grid lines are emitted. The heading, however, lists the
same information.
Example 4.6. Figs. 4.3 7 and 4.3 8 show the headings of the Dual
Induction-Laterolog (DILSM) and Borehole Compensated Log
(BI-ICSM) obtained in the Pardee Co. No. 2 well. U sing the data
recorded on log heading, give the following information.
a. The interval logged.
b. Order of magnitude of the drilling-mud salinity.
c. Depth from sea level of a sand top shown by the log to be
at a depth of 6,224 ft.
d. Best estimate of the formation temperature at the well TD (i.e. ,
9,67 3 ft). Exact circulation time is not available, but it is estimated
to be between 6 and 10 hours.
e. Geothermal gradient.
f. Mud, mud ltrate, and mudcal-re resistivities at 6,224 ft.
Solution.
a. The log heading indicates that the DIL. was run over the entire
openhole interval, which extended from the casing shoe at 2,5 23
ft deep to TD of 9,66? ft. H owever, the BH C sonic log covered
only the interval of 3 ,3 00 to 9,663 ft. The recommended practice,
however, is to log the entire open borehole.
b. Entering Fig. 1.1? or 4.15 with the resistivity of the mud
filtrate, which is 0.94 1 ' m at 7 0F, yields a salinity of about 6,5 00
ppm. This value is based on the assumption that mud ltrate is a
predominantly NaCl solution. It gives, however, a representative
value called equivalent NaCl salinity.
c. As Fig. 4.3 9 illustrates, the depth, D, to the top of the sand mea-
sured from sea level can be calculated as D=6,224 201=6,023 ft.
d. Because two tools were run in the borehole, the H orner-type
plot can be used to estimate the static formation temperature. Data
read from the log heading can be tabulated as shown below.
Time Time
Tm Circulation Logger on
Tool (F) Stopped Bottom
i 5 5 . - i
DIL 4:00 10:3 0
BH C 229 4:00 19:00
The data are used to calculate :5 :and 6n' (t+ 5 t). The circulation
time is estimated to be between 6 and 10 hours. Both values are
used to get a feel for the sensitivity of the estimated formation tem-
perature to the value of r.
T,,, 6:
(_ l=_ _ )_ (hours) n (6 + 5 :) 5 ri( 1 0 + 6:)
212 6.5 0.5 20 0.3 94
229 15 .0 0.214 0.600
The H orner-type plot of Fig. 4.40 was generated with the above
data. Both lines extrapolate to the same temperature of 248 F, which
is the best estimate of static formation temperature. Note that the
result is not sensitive to the value of circulation time used as long
as a reasonable value is chosen.
e. From Eq. 4.15 ,
248 --T0
gG=iX l00=l.B4Fi' 100 ft.
9,6T3
f. The log heading lists the following resistivity values:R,,,=
1.49 0-m at 64F, R,,,f=0.94 0-m at 7 0F, and R,,,,L.=1.24 0-m
at 64. The formation temperature at 6,224 ft is calculated with
Eq. 4.16:
6,224
Tf=7 0+ 1.8 4:=18 5 F.
100
From Eq. 1.13 ,
s4+ s.?1
s,,=1.49 -~ =o.s5 n-m at 1ss"1=,
13 5 + 6.??
T0+ 6.T7
R,,,f=0.94: -- -~ =0.3 8 0-m at 18 5 F,
18 5 + 6.' ?7
64+ 6.7 T
and R,,,,;.=l.24 - -- -20.46 0-m at l8 5 F.
18 5 + 6.7 7
Example 4.7 . Refer to the ISF."sonic log heading in Fig. 4.41 for
the following.
_ |
r
I
J
-I
C
lic
k
t
o
b
u
y
N
O
W
! P
D
F
-
X
C
hange V
ie
w
e
r
w
w
w
. d
o
cu-trac
k
.
c
o
m
C
lic
k
t
o
b
u
y
N
O
W
! P
D
F
-
X
C
hange V
ie
w
e
r
w
w
w
. d
o
cu-trac
k
.
c
o
m
" i n@ _a@ a;i * r s,apc.pl , i t i t
,i ;j,g;R..@ aas-Temp- l l -
S@ -si s-@ ~ !i =_~ =, .i 1i ?s = -
:5 Rm: @ BHT
" EASUHEMENT ENUIHONMENT
gol d Hg,-E _ ___ ___ f_I@ e_Headi ng and Leg Cer 1jg;jnj1__Tg __1i _'PI_R_P_ 31 FD _ _ __
REMARKS - __.as 3 ~ 9 =--;; a as 1 ~
Changes-i nMud TYH1-l | Ei er addi ti onal sanpl es 1, Ssapl psbgvass .0 .0 _,
~ s...| s.s.1.s..:: 6 6 Ts-eaves: we twevpsol e .=e!s.D * v1Hs!a.
ype'F1ui a'i Y1'HE1B Q _ _ __ _
____ .._ _.___1_ __ ----- _ ___
D ene. Vi se. ___ __ ,. ___
sat 6| asses 0| , so as | w;__, L _'._." ' '_'" _1i " .T__ T_' IUIl I(' ' ' I __
l ~ -* : F- 1 eta
Rm@ Mesa. Temp. @
ha
@
_ . l i onNe. _____ _ Tool TYp_e_____ Pad Type__Tee_l __l fes1tr en__l _ _ _ ______et:______ __ _
@
Q _ _
@ : r e
a
R... @ __BH'f 1 _ ___ __
4
r e
at
see
ai
r e
Rm:@ BI-IT
F 1.
F -a" * " " " " " " " -i i -" " * " r " " "
i _ _ _ pf 1 m1 ' j i IIIUIIHi f'I I.PIII" '_K_'_| T
I
l _ LLLL - 0 - -- -- _ _
Fi g. 4.36-Second fol d of the l eg headi ng showi ng the r emar ks secti on.
Space i s pr ovi ded for r emar ks onthe second fol d of the l eg. The
Remar ks secti oni nFi g. 4.36 i ncl udes (a) gener al r emar ks; (b) mud
datafor two addi ti onal sampl es for the par ti cul ar l og r un; (c) scal e
changes i f made dur i ng l oggi ng; (d) and detai l ed eq ui pment data,
i ncl udi ng tool type, pad type, and tool eccentr i ci ty.
Recent l og headi ngs ar e gener ated by computer . A computer -
gener ated wel l headi ng l ooks di ffer ent fr omthat showni nFi g. 4.35
because the gr i d l i nes ar e emi tted. The headi ng, however , l i sts the
same i nfor mati on.
Exampl e 4.6. Fi gs. 4.37 and 4.38 show the headi ngs of the D ual
Inducti on-Later ol og (D ILSM) and Bor ehol e Compensated Leg
(Bl -ICSM) obtai ned i nthe Par dee Ce. No. 2 wel l . Usi ng the data
r ecor ded onl eg headi ng, gi ve the fol l owi ng i nfor mati on.
a. The i nter val l ogged.
b. Or der of magni tude of the dr i l l i ng-mud sal i ni ty.
c. D epth fr omseal evel of asand top shownby the l og to be
at adepth of 6,224 ft.
d. Best esti mate of the for mati ontemper atur e at the wel l TD (i .e. ,
9 ,673 ft) . Exact ci r cul ati onti me i s net avai l abl e, but i t i s esti mated
to be between6 and 10 hour s.
e. G eother mal gr adi ent.
f. Mud, mud l tr ate, and mudcake r esi sti vi ti es at 6,224 ft.
Sol uti on.
a. The l o g headi ng i ndi cates that the D IL. was r unover the enti r e
epenhel e i nter val , whi ch extended fr omthe casi ng shoe at 2,5 23
ft deep to TD of 9 ,66? ft. However , the BHC soni c l og cover ed
onl y the i nter val of 3,300 to 9 ,663 ft. The r ecommended pr acti ce,
however , i s to l og the enti r e openbor ehol e.
b. Enter i ng Fi g. Ll ? or 4.15 wi th the r esi sti vi ty of the mud
fi l tr ate, whi ch i s 0.9 4 1'mat 70F, yi el ds asal i ni ty of about 6,5 00
ppm. Thi s val ue i s based onthe assumpti onthat mud l tr ate i s a
pr edomi nantl y NaCl sol uti on. It gi ves, however , ar epr esentati ve
val ue cal l ed eq ui val ent NaCl sal i ni ty.
c. As Fi g. 4.39 i l l ustr ates, the depth, D , to the top of the sand mea-
sur ed fr omseal evel canbe cal cul ated as D =6,224201=6,023 ft.
d. Because two tool s wer e r uni nthe bor ehol e, the Hor ner -type
pl ot canbe used to esti mate the stati c for mati ontemper atur e. D ata
r ead fr omthe l og headi ng can be tabul ated as shownbel ow.
Ti me Ti me
Tm Ci r cul ati on Logger on
Tool (F) Stopped Bottom
i 5 5 . - i
D IL 4:00 10:30
BHC 229 4:00 19 :00
The dataar e used to cal cul ate :5 : and 6n'(t+5 t) . The ci r cul ati on
ti me i s esti mated to be between6 and 10 hour s. Beth val ues ar e
used to get afeel for the sensi ti vi ty of the esti mated for mati ontem-
per atur e to the val ue of r .
T,,, 6:
(_l =__) _ (hour s) n (6 +5 :) 5 r i ( l 0 +6:)
212 6.5 0.5 20 0.39 4
229 15 .0 0.214 0.600
The Hor ner -type pl ot of Fi g. 4.40 was gener ated wi th the above
data. Both l i nes extr apol ate to the same temper atur e of 248 F, whi ch
i s the best esti mate of stati c for mati ontemper atur e. Note that the
r esul t i s not sensi ti ve to the val ue of ci r cul ati onti me used as l ong
as ar easonabl e val ue i s chosen.
e. Fr omEq . 4.15 ,
248--T0
gG =i X l 00=1.B4Fl '100 ft.
9 ,6T3
f. The l og headi ng l i sts the fol l owi ng r esi sti vi ty val ues: R,,,=
1.49 0-mat 64F, R,,,f=0.9 4 0-mat 70F, and R,,,,L.=1.24 l l -m
at 64. The for mati ontemper atur e at 6,224 ft i s cal cul ated wi th
Eq . 4.16:
6,224
Tf=70+1.84:=185 F.
100
Fr omEq . 1.13,
s4+s.?v
a,,,=1.49 -~ =e.s5 o-mat 1ss" 1=,
135 +6.??
T0+6.T7
R,.,,f=0.9 4:---~ =0.38 0-Inat l 85 F,
185 +6.'?7
64+6.7T
and Rm,_.=l .24----20.46 0-mat l 85 F.
185 +6.77
Exampl e 4.7. Refer to the ISF:soni c l eg headi ng i nFi g. 4.41for
the fol l owi ng.
_ |
r
I
J
-I
8 2 TH EOFIY, MEASU REMENT, AND INTEFIPH ETATION OF WELL LOGS
0 i . 1 COMPANL - 5
0 / / -
5 1 IH .E._ BaRE! EE_ ....C0.t1P..s.N.YNil?_ _ _
T3 000Q FIELD lVAN,_ ,:0i_ ; ,
00L
1 l-I
van
sud
H
c0ur~ 4rY_ --_ - B.05 5 -IEB.- _ -sTATEl LOU I5 ..l.aNA.....----_ -_ ._ .
_ 1,907 -5 5 1. _ s s5 ,1,_ ,' _ F,l;.l,l_ ,,l~ l_ t sw "v-' 5 -* i=' =* =
CATCl - BH C.FDC/ GR
TY
H
ANT
2
coon to WELL com
CATU
D
-1
I .
API SERIAL ND. SEC. TWP RANGE
= .15 " 2s 2111 11w ,
Permonent Dutumt. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ;Ei9v.: E|Ev.: l' (.B._ _ ..2_ Q..]....._ ...
0 Log Measured From_ _ KB i_ _ _ _ _ Fl. Above Perm. Datum l.IJ.F._ ...;02....Q._ [ i}_ .........
_ Dmo 112-13 -vs, 1
Drilling Metlsurdd From .. .. - - - (Mi
as as pppp owl?" . = 1 '
0 9.sl5 ' h-ril! E000.000000 {$16,7 40 ._ _ _ _ 0
_ _ D' lllP* i' _ ' f0-_ 0-l="9Q_ ' ' llI.. -_ . . 9 6?3 l
Btm. Log _ l_ n_ tervo| 00 _ _ _ 0_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
-T' =I0=0 =9 I==ar# =s ;=.I 02 5 2 3 _ 0
< :===iri -jrvma 5 i"i9i* i"5 ,f0@00gf5 ;_ 5 _ _ 1 l- M @
E= lvsEsass* 000.0000 K25 23 _ 0.Q].-000. -0 ;_ _ j,] 00
T B" $i s0 ll B 3 0Z ?l0]0.0 00000.00 . _ 0 1 .
_ ._ _ _ _ .._ R .. _ .
I l waspr:-41.1 assist 05 sU 05 1' 1 Q -5 ,5 11
0E0ns.000|0vi:e. 13 _ S000000Z l0F,000 0 0 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 00 ,
Iiciorce oi Somple _ 0
U 115
0000|0:H 00 ||=|..:JL..I.ii 0 5 g_ 1005 10 00 0 0000 i 00000n0|0 0 i astf in-ll
-"" -- --- -- - - --- ---? ---" - - ---- . ' ' |
p i@64 -For -1:- 1
Rm @00M0eos. Temp.00000
it - -"-- --- ---- -- - -----' ' '
F
@
M005 5 . TIBITIP 00 0 0000F
0a:
4:-
u --- - - .._ ._ _ _ _ . _ ------- -- --
@ If 1 . . _
0 R615 asa;iits.ap rd) 63 ,0 0?0 00
I
d
1" ;l\-3 ' EU ! it @.
F i _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ J-_ @. @l@
iisi.....;n;.;+ ii|"R... g pg A
1 f
_ l_
I1; _
' ."3 @Bt" .05 @212' Fl @._ . (E0-D
I
._ _ dn_ l Cirsvlviivn $l==Pl5 ===ii 4000 000000000
> 2
I- ltreserd-? B5 H ~ =m0 0003 00 0
000|lid0.Ree000T0emp. in 1,3 12 _ F 1":gr
1
is-Fvr=ls4 Br ll iflC,CaI_ ,L _ ,_ _ -,_ l
Wilnessed 0B0y0r0 00 | _ | ...000 5 :0 it 0 Q 000 5 '
Fig. 4.3 7 DlL heading of Example 4.6 (courtesy Sun Oil Co.).
a. Sketch a cross section of the well where the log was run. Show
different boreholes and casings. Mark the borehole siz es, casing
siz es, and casing depths. Also mark the mud weight used to drill
each section of the well.
b. List the values of the temperatures recorded in the well, the
depth at which each value was recorded, and the elapsed time since
mud circulation stopped.
e. Give your best estimate of formation temperature at 5 ,000 and
24,000 ft.
d. Estimate the resistivity of the mud ltrate saturating the ushed
z one of a permeable formation situated at 5 ,000 ft. Comment on
the representativity of your estimate.
Solution.
a. This deep well (D=20,5 5 6 ft) required the setting of several
intermediate casing strings. The data from the ve logging runs
were used to prepare the wells cross section in Fig. 4.42.
b. Data pertaining to temperature measurement in this well are
given in Table 4.3 .
c. Assuming linear distribution yields the following values from
Eqs. 4.15 and 4.16:
3 60-20
gG=- -- - -100=1.4lFl' l00 a,
20,5 5 6
= -f- -4: ' 0'
T to 1410000000 141 1=
5 ' 0" 100
24,000
and T24,000 =7 U "i' 1 W=* 5 i-08 00p.
H owever, assuming a linear distribution starting with T_ .,=-7 0F
is not valid for deep wells. As Fig. 4.43 illustrates, the line
C
lic
k
t
o
b
u
y
N
O
W
! P
D
F
-
X
C
hange V
ie
w
e
r
w
w
w
. d
o
cu-trac
k
.
c
o
m
C
lic
k
t
o
b
u
y
N
O
W
! P
D
F
-
X
C
hange V
ie
w
e
r
w
w
w
. d
o
cu-trac
k
.
c
o
m
THEORY, MEASUREMENT, AND INTERPRETATION OF WELL
A A . 1 coMPAr ~ :Y-- - 5
I / / -
A 1 IH:E._.PaRE!EE.-.C0.t4P..a,N.Y N11 ? __ _
T300Q FIELD l VaN,_,,:i ,_; p
FOL
1l -I
van
sud
H
c0ur ~ 4r Y----- B.05 5 -IEB- --sTATEl LOUI5 ..l -.a:NA.--1-1-1-3-.
_ 19 07 ' 115 1. _s s5 ,1,_,'_F,,1;.?,t,l 1_ sw " v-' 5 -* i ='=* =
CATCi - BHC.FD C/ G R
TY
H
ANT
2
coon to wen com
CATU
D
-1
I .
API SERIAL ND . SEC. TWP RANG E
= .15 " 2s 2111 11w ,
Per manent D utumt. _ _________;Ei 9 v.: E| Ev.: l '(.B.__..2_Q..]....._...
I Leg Measur ed Fr em__ KB 1_____Ft. Above Per m. D etum D .F.__2..g._q ._._
_D mo 112-13-veg 1
D r i | | i ng Measur ed Fr om .. .. - - - (Mi
as 4? :::: ow" ? 1 = i '
A D tsi ai h-D r i l i l i ffi l i _,9 ,6,740 1 ___ 0
_P@ * P* i '_'_',-_E" 9 I=i _'?* !.'... --. . 9 6?3 1
Btm. Log i nter val i n ______ ______
-T'=P0 =9 I==1r #=s;=.I F2 5 2 3_ A
< :===1r i s -jr sma Ai 5 9 5 5 5 5 5 / @ gf5 ;_5 __ 1 ,1 M @
_= i vaEeasst00l 7 1025 23 _Qf-f7 --. ;__j,] i f
T B" 5 5 !? H B 30Z?l f Tji f . - T II 1
..__.. .._ R .. _ .
I , gr yas nae assi st Tr ; ,s U5 1' 1 Q -5 ,5 11
0e_ns.'__| _Vi :c. 13_S" '1IF1T _ i ________ H ,
Ii eer ce oi Sampl e _ '
TUFEQ
weft. | 1=| ..:.;.-.2.-;i i I 5 g_ i nl l H_ '____ i 'mr El __ _ i .s1f i n-1|
-" " -- ---" ---- --- ---? ---" - ---. ' ' |
1 1@ 64 -For 4:-1
Rm@ i ass=. Temp.m:
s --- --- ------- -----'' '
F
@
-05 5 . TIBITIP i n - El :
to
4:-
u--- - - .._.____. _ -----------
@ If II 1 1 _
' ta; aaeai i taap 1'6) 615 ,- F;
I
d
1" ;l \-3'EU! i t @ :
F i _____ _
__.i -_ @ . r ol e
_.S.our cei m0mf..l _Rmc g pg A
1f
_i _
I1; _
' 1* " : ear s ,0-5 @ 212'Fw @ ._.
I
.__dn_ Ci r svl vi i vn$ t==P| 5 ===i i 4000 TTTT
i ts
I - l l i eeer d-? B5 110" ? 000371] 0
i n..;.a.e:" 1:...p. i n 1,312 _ F 1" : gr
1
-83-Fvr =i e4 Br ,1 tfl C,,CaI_,L _,__-,_ l
Wi i nessed B5 ? U | _| ...m;_,,_ i t _ Q ___ 1 '
Fi g. 4.37D l L headi ng of Exampl e 4.6 (cour tesy SunOi l Ce.) .
a. Sketch acr oss secti onof the wel l wher e the l og was r un. Show
di ffer ent bor ehol es and casi ngs. Mar k the bor ehol e si zes, casi ng
si zes, and casi ng depths. Al so mar k the mud wei ght used to dr i l l
each secti onof the wel l .
b. Li st the val ues of the temper atur es r ecor ded i nthe wel l , the
depth at whi ch each val ue was r ecor ded, and the el apsed ti me si nce
mud ci r cul ati onstopped.
c. G i ve your best esti mate of for mati ontemper atur e at 5 ,000 and
24,000 ft.
d. Esti mate the r esi sti vi ty of the mud l tr ate satur ati ng the ushed
zone of aper meabl e for mati onsi tuated at 5 ,000 ft. Comment on
the r epr esentati vi ty of your esti mate.
Sol uti on.
a. Thi s deep wel l (D =20,5 5 6 ft) r eq ui r ed the setti ng of sever al
i nter medi ate casi ng str i ngs. The datafr omthe ve l oggi ng r uns
wer e used to pr epar e the wel l s cr oss secti oni nFi g. 4.42.
b. D ataper tai ni ng to temper atur e measur ement i nthi s wel l ar e
gi ven i nTabl e 4.3.
c. Assumi ng l i near di str i buti onyi el ds the fol l owi ng val ues fr om
Eq s. 4.15 and 4.16:
360-1'0
gG =--10e=1.41~ =w100 r t,
20,5 5 6
= -f- -4 : 0
T so 141moo 141 1=
5 '0" 100
24,000
and T24,,[ }00 =7U" | ' 1 W =4-08F.
However , assumi ng al i near di str i buti onstar ti ng wi th T_,,=-70F
i s not val i d for deep wel l s. As Fi g. 4.43 i l l ustr ates, the l i ne
MEASU REMENT ENVIRONMENT
B3
COMPANY 5 U i l...' 3 |L..-.Q.0MPaNY . i
3
; .- - (0/ =/ --.--..- _
wens.-. tut P.sR@EE c0MPllll.Y--..s.@.2
MP0
.
D0E_ E (ii.
co
FIELD . I Va.I$l,.
R
E
U L - 1 COU l' -lTY,. B0S5 ...l.ER 1 -sTATELOU ISlA.lla,gg_ -.
SE
Ea
sos
rs
TH E
an
..
3 07 ' 0FSL EL 8 41 ' F' ll' L NE SW S-Pl Olhrssil-' i=Et=
CAT D
' ' A DlL.FDC/ GR
H
ANT
O
_ _ 1-I
TY
{DU N FEl.D LDCAT Cl WELL COMP
Permonent Dotum-- [ -E_ 0_ $r.E.|- _ _ - Elm... i 8 3 E|g.. . K 3 2 Oi
. M! E. 0. sec. ' rvvr= RANGE.
- _ _ .=I 2s 2m 11w l
Drilling Meosured From_ -.KB . _ _ _
LGQ f' li' iEO5 U I' EiIl FfU |' l"l--- 0_ _ _ _ ,_ . F1, Abgvg ggrm, Dfum 00
,/ G,|_ , 18 3
Dole 012' -13 -7 5
-l 00RLJri0 NSQ00000000 0 [ ]|' \l0E0000
0 Pest:-ril' s' 0 000000000l96.?4 -_ 0 l" |
Ii. _ _ _ _ .._ . _ _
DEP' h-' ~ "l l.9El.l5 . h' -3 l905 07 3 ....., 0 1.- 0
Bim.0Lolg000lh0tervo| sass _ 1 it _ _ L L e
tstsiit.5 gif.sg..sl 0 0 ' " '
Cosing;0[ 0)0i0i00l0l0e0r0000000 .9 gt ' """5 * @
Cosing I.ogger 0 0 00 00000 0 I 00
.- . he 3 .. 1,, Tl.
ii
0Trh0e0F|~ idi 1gl.s--. (0-04U |T|g_ _ y A pp
_ _ _ Dens. lVisc.
00PH 0000i PW 8 . 5 0
Source of
U - l
"1 fl tls.s.a.Ts.n.p= 000 0.1:-
to
l7 * 0o":
as
ii 00000
-r01 gt -r-0i
s"6
f
fimf rs. asserts... d
00l2.D
as .5 , "---I r::-
I1
.8 01
-S
:09
-|"'
fl-
- l
r\
Rmc -0c0t00.i0h0l0sos. Temp.
_ _ _ _ lt_ ;-;;_ ' _ _ _ ._ _ ....
J,-. .-_ 0 00 0
0 00l0
_ _ _ _ _ _ F, ' F _ i "0
"TI
Sourc_ e_ :_ _ _ 0 _ _
E F!
Rm -H BH T -""
.-""
=r~ :r will ho
"Tl
I_ _
; 1-..~ . :1 cn
00' }
-lie
il I1
1.c.j_ % < l
- E @_ -1-' 1
.-. _ _ - ' 0' 0' _ F_ _
0 _ .._ , _ _ _ _ _ ;_ |~ O 5 _
I-I-I Circulolion Stopped [ )4(j{]0
.= L@doe0r005 }+ 00B,e,l[ g,n1 ,196i;jT,, 1 1
~ m;R@te;r@+ ap;j_ yyrcr _ -r 1 "n
i
ts?-lea l LF.' =.' .! li?L0... :1 1' 10 .I ..t0LL0E..Rl0 ...
Recorded _ _ _ _ _ |.r|C_ .;_ _ gLL_ _ _
-==~ @$-Eilirtlr-it 1- D-ll 6 iiii is
Fig. 4.3 B -BH C sonic log of Example 4.6 (courtesy Sun Oil Co.).
representing the calculated geothermal gradient of 1.41 Fr' l00 ft
does not go through the data points. Moreover, a straight line forced
through the data points results in an unrealistic temperatures at the
surface (T5 .= 60F) and at 5 ,000 ft (T5 3 00 =40F).
A sernilog plot of the data (Fig. 4.44) results in a realistic surface
temperature of 7 8 F. The temperature distribution shown in Fig.
4.44 is expressed by Eq. 4.18 :
Tf=jr3 ' ?.5 4xl0_ 5 D_
Fig. 4.44 and the above equation yield the best temperature esti-
mates. Then, Tf =1 14F at 5 ,000 ft and Tf =48 0F at 24,000 ft.
d. The formation situated at a depth of 5 ,000 ft was logged dur-
ing Run 1. The sampled mud ltrate yielded R,,,f=0.5 l 0-m at
7 4F. Assuming that the mud sampled at the time of logging is
the same mud present in the borehole at the time of drilling yields
7 4+ 6.T?
Rmf=0.5 li =0.3 4 0-m at 114]-7 . i
ll4+ 6.' r' 0r
Review Questions
1. Why does measurement environment have to be known?
2. What are the main parameters that define the measurement
environment?
3 . What formation types give rise to borehole enlargement? Why?
4. What is mudcake? What are the conditions required for its
formation? H ow does its presence affect borehole diameter?
5 . What are the different caliper measurements available? Why
do they usually display different readings in the same hole?
6. What are the different uses of caliper information?
C
lic
k
t
o
b
u
y
N
O
W
! P
D
F
-
X
C
hange V
ie
w
e
r
w
w
w
. d
o
cu-trac
k
.
c
o
m
C
lic
k
t
o
b
u
y
N
O
W
! P
D
F
-
X
C
hange V
ie
w
e
r
w
w
w
. d
o
cu-trac
k
.
c
o
m
MEASUREMENT ENVIRONMENT
COMPANY 5 Ui l ...9 | L.,.Q.0MPaNY 1 l
3
; 3- - (0/ =/ ---.- _
wn1.,.._ tut PERBEE c0MPtu,Y__.,s,@ .2
MP;
,
D E_E Cl i .
co
FIELD 1 I Vai l ,
R
E
UL - 1 COUl '-l TY,. BUSSJER 1 _sTATELOUISl A,l l sgg,__,
SE
Es
eos
ta
THE
an
N
'1 307'FSL EL 841 'F'l t'L NE SW S-Pl Ol hr ssi l -'l =st=
CAT D
' ' A D l L.FD C/ G R
H
ANT
O
___ 1-I
TY
{D UN FEl .D LD CAT Cl WELL COMP
Per manent D etum-- I-E_T_$ r _E_L __ . El ev. 1 83 E| g.,. . K 3 2 Oi
. M! E. ct. sec. TWP RANG E.
- __.=I 2s 2m 11w l
D r i l l i ng Measur ed Fr em_-.KB . __ _
LG Q f'l i 'l EO5 UI'Ei Il FfU| 'l " l --- .____T_. F1, Abgvg ggr m, D fum H
,/ G ,| _, 183
D ol e 012'-13-75
-l ti ts-.;-.1 NSQTRRRR ' UN-l i t" :
Z Pest:-D r i l l ed TTl 9 6.?4 __ T l " |
Ii . ___ _ ___ . __
D EP'h-'~ l 9 .9 El .i 5 . h'-3119 05 -732, 0 1, i f
stm.t1sgti ai +;e.s| sass _ 1 i t __ L L e
_feB_l .e_:'l r Ti er vel _ ' ' " '
Cesl ngl ti i -l 'fI'E* 'T .9 gt '" " " 5 * @
Cosi ngl .ogger u u T_ I-1; _ I "
.- . cs 3.. ,,,_ Tl .
i i
.Tt'l 5 _e:F| i di l l _:| l gi _ ___ 04U| T| g__ p A pg
___D ens. l Vi sc.
__PH____i Fl ui d 8 . 5
Sour ce of
U -l
" 1 fl tts.v;_.Ts.n.p= 0: '_::-
to
l l ?-l i on
as
i l -r t
-H gt -1-I
s-s
f
fi mf as assti vsap. e
-LG
as .5 , " ---Ic-
I1
.e'
-S
r
-| " '
fl -
- l
r \
Rmc -:ti Th'l Teos. Temp.
____l t_ ;-;;_ '_ __.__....
J,-. 1-_ ' " T '
T Ml
______F, 'F _i "
" TI
sour c_e_:___ _ __
E Ft
Rm-H BHT -" "
.-" "
to wi l l to
" Tl
I__
; i s :1 cn
'0'}
-l i e
i l I1
1.o.,1_% < 1
- E @ _ -1-'1
.-. --_- " " '_F__
' _.,_, _____;_ | ~ O 5 _
I-I-I Ci r cul oti onStopped [ ) 4(j{]'
.= Looei r l i fgogttggm119 15 5 , 1 1
am;Ra:;taap;j_ yyr i r _ F 1 " r t
i
Est-Ri el l l < =sv,!i .a..j Tr r 10 l l ttyti i ttl tgal l ...
Recor ded __ _ __ | | C_.;__gLL__ _
v==~ mBi Bl aP-i t 0- D -11 s i i i i i t
Fi g. 4.3B-BHCsoni c l og of Exampl e 4.6 (cour tesy SunOi l Ce.) .
r epr esenti ng the cal cul ated geother mal gr adi ent of 1.41Fr 'l 00 ft
does not go thr ough the datapoi nts. Mor eover , astr ai ght l i ne for ced
thr ough the datapoi nts r esul ts i nanunr eal i sti c temper atur es at the
sur face (T,.= 60F) and at 5 ,000 ft (T5 300 =40F) .
A semi l og pl ot of the data(Fi g. 4.44) r esul ts i nar eal i sti c sur face
temper atur e of 78F. The temper atur e di str i buti onshowni nFi g.
4.44 i s expr essed by Eq . 4.18:
Tf=jr 3 '?.5 4x10_5 D _
Fi g. 4.44 and the above eq uati onyi el d the best temper atur e esti -
mates. Then, Tf = 1 14F at 5 ,000 ft and Tf =480F at 24,000 ft.
d. The for mati onsi tuated at adepth of 5 ,000 ft was l ogged dur -
i ng Run 1. The sampl ed mud l tr ate yi el ded R,,,f=0.5 l 0-mat
74F. Assumi ng that the mud sampl ed at the ti me of l oggi ng i s
the same mud pr esent i nthe bor ehol e at the ti me of dr i l l i ng yi el ds
74+6.T?
Rmf=0.5 l i =0.34 0-mat 114]-7. l
l l 4+6.?T
Revi ew Questi ons
1. Why does measur ement envi r onment have to be known?
2. What ar e the mai npar ameter s that defi ne the measur ement
envi r onment?
3. What for mati ontypes gi ve r i se to bor ehol e enl ar gement? Why?
4. What i s mudcake? What ar e the condi ti ons r eq ui r ed for i ts
for mati on? How does i ts pr esence affect bor ehol e di ameter ?
5 . What ar e the di ffer ent cal i per measur ements avai l abl e? Why
do they usual l y di spl ay di ffer ent r eadi ngs i nthe same hol e?
6. What ar e the di ffer ent uses of cal i per i nfor mati on?
8 4 TH EORY, MEASU REMENT, AND INTERPRETATION OF WELL LOGS
Kpell Eiushin Level _
.1 1 be ""
.._ I ll Derrick Floor
I0 Fietery Tobie
Q I E
-.~ -| 1
6
N I 1
I ' "* -- ----t-|- -- --- -- See Level
- 6224
I I
I I 0-
iss - - 1 Send Top
-I
Ll
- -ct.
Fig. 4.3 9--Schematic for Part c, Example 4.6.
7 . Explain how mudcake buildup can go undetected by caliper
logs.
S. What drilling mud data are pertinent to logging operations?
9. What is the most commonly used mud? What is its makeup?
10. H ow are the mud, mud ltrate, and mudcake resistivities
usually determined? '
I1. H ow does temperature affect the mud and mud-ltrate
resistivities? H ow is that effect determined?
12. What is a mud log?
I3 . What causes variation in drilling-mud resistivity? H ow does
this variation complicate leg analysis?
L4. Describe the step, transition, and annulus proles of invasion.
15 . What are the parameters that control the mud-ltrate volume
invading a permeable formation?
16. Explain why porosity is the essential parameter that deter-
mines the depth of invasion? H ow does the diameter of invasion
vary with porosity?
2so-~ - -s4~ -0 J
"H r.
H .
H u-
00"" 000-0:-.."---..
240-
o|_ |_ g
/ It
/ I .
I
TEMPERATU RE
I' D or O
I
r
* 2204
210 l-
r.-.10
r.-6
. .2 .3 .4.5 .e .8 l
1 Bl/ H -+ 5 1) I
I 246 F f| _ ,
200i. J--_ e4 L.----I |* r---_ I 4.1 I
.1 Fig. 4.4U H orner-type temperature buildup plot for Exam-
ple 4.6.
1?. Define the geothermal gradient. I-Iow is it usually calculated?
18 . Why is the BH T indicated by the maximum-recording ther-
mometer usually less than the formation temperature?
19. H ow does temperature distribution in deep wells differ from
that in shallow wells?
20. Why is it recommended to designate a permanent datum and
indicate its elevation on the well heading?
21. Why is knowing the elevation of the kelly bushing usually
necessary?
22. Why does the well TD indicated by the driller differ from
that indicated by the logger?
23 . What additional information do you think should be recorded
on the leg heading?
Problems
4.1 Fig. 4.45 shows a one-arm device caliper and a three-arm
bow-spring device caliper obtained in the same borehole in-
terval. Explain the disagreement between the two logs in both
the thick and thin z ones.
4.2 Fig. 4.46 shows an interval of a microcaliper recorded in
a Ouachita Parish, LA, well.
1' -.' ' _ r' .."_ III-nu-r| | Inn-|-I -.I|-r nlnlpl lln-otl
- TABLE 4-.3 TEMPERATU FIE DATA OF EXAMPLE 4.?
JII-|||| ' 1-I |IIIIo||. .-.' Jl-| line-I "PH . II-i II-0-ll-I III-I-P
Timer' Date
Data D Circulation
TimelDate
Logger on
Point
I 1
2
U ! -I5 -DJ
J :-;- _ : _ -
Missing data.
"Two thermometers were used during this run. The highest reading is retained.
l)
1e,?25
1s,5 ?9
2e.e?4
20.444
20.5 5 6
Stepped
1013 03 001. 28
N! A*
01:00lAprit 18
01:3 U l' Apri|26
21:00lMay l
Bottom
22:3 0l0ct. 26
1?:3 U l.lan. 19
11:00! April 16
0tl:U 0r' April 29
21 :U 01' lviay 2
5 t
(hours)
12
NIA
10
22.5
24
T...
(Fl
220
2?5
3 5 5 * *
3 60
3 60
C
lic
k
t
o
b
u
y
N
O
W
! P
D
F
-
X
C
hange V
ie
w
e
r
w
w
w
. d
o
cu-trac
k
.
c
o
m
C
lic
k
t
o
b
u
y
N
O
W
! P
D
F
-
X
C
hange V
ie
w
e
r
w
w
w
. d
o
cu-trac
k
.
c
o
m
THEORY MEASUREMENT AND INTERPRETATION OF WED
Kel l Ei ushi n Level _
.1 E i f " "
.._ I fl D er r i ck Fl oor
7 Fi otor y Tobi e
6
N I 1
I - ---1;--=----See 1.4-.-4|
6224
I 1
I I I-
? - -" " 1 Send Top
-I
Ll
- -ct. "
Fi g. 4.39 --Schemati c for Par t c, Exampl e 4.6.
7. Expl ai nhow mudcake bui l dup cango undetected by cal i per
l ogs.
S. What dr i l l i ng-mud dataar e per ti nent to l oggi ng oper ati ons?
9 . What i s the most commonl y used mud? What i s i ts makeup?
10. How ar e the mud, mud l tr ate, and mudcake r esi sti vi ti es
usual l y deter mi ned? '
I1. How does temper atur e affect the mud and mud-l tr ate
r esi sti vi ti es? How i s that effect deter mi ned?
12. What i s amud l og?
I3. What causes var i ati oni ndr i l l i ng-mud r esi sti vi ty? How does
thi s var i ati oncompl i cate l og anal ysi s?
L4. D escr i be the step, tr ansi ti on, and annul us pr ol es of i nvasi on.
15 . What ar e the par ameter s that contr ol the mud-l tr ate vol ume
i nvadi ng aper meabl e for mati on?
16. Expl ai nwhy por osi ty i s the essenti al par ameter that deter -
mi nes the depth of i nvasi on? How does the di ameter of i nvasi on
var y wi th por osi ty?
mm-- -F~ -
I 24a" r
F.
I:
/ I
/ l l
240-
o| _| _ y
/ I,
/ I .
I .
r
TEMPERATURE
| '\) 0! G _
* 2204
2l O I-
ZOOI. J -24.... L.----I 14.- I 4.1 I
. .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .8 l
. St/ (l +3l l I
r .-.10
r .-6
.1 Fi g. 4.4UHor ner -type temper atur e bui l dup pl ot for Exam-
pl e 4.6.
1?. D efi ne the geother mal gr adi ent. I-Iow i s i t usual l y cal cul ated?
18. Why i s the BHT i ndi cated by the maxi mum-r ecor di ng ther -
mometer usual l y l ess thanthe for mati ontemper atur e?
19 . How does temper atur e di str i buti oni ndeep wel l s di ffer fr om
that i nshal l ow wel l s?
20. Why i s i t r ecommended to desi gnate aper manent datumand
i ndi cate i ts el evati ononthe wel l headi ng?
21. Why i s knowi ng the el evati onof the kel l y bushi ng usual l y
necessar y?
22. Why does the wel l TD i ndi cated by the dr i l l er di ffer fr om
that i ndi cated by the l ogger ?
23. What addi ti onal i nfor mati ondo you thi nk shoul d be r ecor ded
onthe l og headi ng?
Pr obl ems
4.1 Fi g. 4.45 shows aone-ar mdevi ce cal i per and athr ee-ar m
bow-spr i ng devi ce cal i per obtai ned i nthe same bor ehol e i n-
ter val . Expl ai nthe di sagr eement betweenthe two l ogs i nboth
the thi ck and thi nzones.
4.2 Fi g. 4.46 shows an i nter val of ami cr ocal i per r ecor ded i n
aOuachi taPar i sh, LA, wel l .
1'-.' '_ r '.." _ l l -nu-| | | Inn-| -I -.I| -r nl nl pl r l n-otl
- TABLE 4-.3TEMPERATUFIE D ATA OF EXAMPLE 4.?
JII-| | | | '1-I | IIIIe| | . .-.'.n-| ti n-I " PH. II-i II-0-l l -I III-I-P
Ti mel l ate
D ata D Ci r cul ati on
' T I
Ti mel D ate I
Logger on
Poi nt
I 1
2
(H-I5 -D J
J :-;- _:_ -
Mi ssi ng data.
" Two ther mometer s wer e used dur i ng thi s r un. The hi ghest r eadi ng i s r etai ned.
(fl )
1s,?25
1s,5 ?s
2o.er 4
20.444
20.5 5 6
Stopped
1013011001. 28
N!A*
01:00l Apr i t 18
01:3Ul Apr i | 26
21:U0l May i
Bottom
22:30l 0ct. 26
1?:3Ul Jan. 19
11:00.0-i pr i i 16
00:00l 'Apr i l 29
21:U01'l vl ay 2
61 T,,,
(hour s) (F)
12
NIA
10
22.5
24
220
2?5
35 5 * *
360
360
MEASU REMENT ENVIRONMENT
8 5
i-
0-_ * .-' 0.
- 1.
I
' Ptl H
inherit 1
" -4 - -.-ill ' .' l ' --.
.1 r l
._ ..' .;,;tr;1t0' I--0
I
this 00
_ C' .
TAL:
.5 .
H I
5 ! .5 ?.
ts..- H it.-D
III
..' -._ -.- -ll--' 1-* "7 ' * -i=0010' 00' 0 0 0 ..tl11l._ .,1.Lb17 ,.z i11 z a..li...* .=i0:0l'
fie.-' l,. ....
latte
DTQBJ1
L?0 -.0' 0-r
i0.0.l.illGE,00000_ H -l1._ F.c.s_
S
0' \.
I I
"0. :.r_ _ .._ i - 0000
' 5 0
.._ 3 .-
' 1l.. ii, .
bl, .-_ - * 0
pig! ' _ ::10
_ . .-.?:"-7 . L =- ' as -' -
._ ,"' - i_ ._ I-0:0
r -
- 3 ...-_ ~ _ ,;_ .=r -.4-.. it-.-05 .05 .5
3 .1% I0 8 9
asEr c?:iiJ0r~ r"~ 3 ' -
"PW
D0 _
Run H
u _ _ _ _
l H -l . I..IIl. -|-1
-E
Dllq
"-' -"-' - - f- .f_ - " I I-" _ f l ' _ ' ="' _ - ' _ _ l1f_ 1' -'
JIH I-I -- _ _ 1--n I-| |II|Ir -1- _ IIllI_ p-|..n.q_
_ _ _ _
1:5 lntlnrql 0 _ 0 |0 0,0; 0 - ' -0 0 0000 . 00 .000 00 0. ' 0
' --""' "---- ? -l--- ' - ---11 - ;_ _ l 1 _ 1 I "' 1' " "..' ._ |._ -_
Wild inl! l_ ' vn_ l|_ _ _ _ _ _ ' . ;_ _ i _ _ l_ _ _ _ "_ _ _ _ ._ _ _ _
.._ :-- - --0 0 -- - - _ _ u |_ @ _ p_ 0 _ --_ _ l .|I|u|-rr. |..|_ _ _ _ _ - .. - _ _ _ _ _ -_ _ _ _ : _ _ _ _
_ l"-I r_
.u-nu-l 1 _ _ -1-|-|_ :
I 1| I I. I ? I I 7 I _ _
I -II |:| r I _ I _ .i.|_ _ _ _ |-L - _ _ ' . _ |_ I I _ . _
nl. l_ _ Til-t
l
+ 0;1-* 0- 4 I.
._ _ _ |I| --~ ' --. ' _ _ _ . ---_ _ |. _ ---
Dl . . " - ' _
._ "_ _ _ " _ ' _ ' .n|ll-|_ ' _ . _ _ | _ _ _ ll |-u .- _ ' -' _ .-" _ _ _ q - _
Ii _ _ |||.00 0_ 00_ _ 0_ .l_ I-|_ -_ ' |IlIr "M0 -.' _ ' _ ' .lIL_ _ _ _ 0-r..|_ 0 _ _ 0 I
| 0? |_ 0 00 WW5 ? 0 007 -00:0-0- 0 - 0 F_ _ _ ' 0- - ---- -- ' _ ' _ _ _ _
. 1' 1
-fl
ajlgv
.1?
E
Im Mid:limp
15 > El
ii-
-' - .1; 5 .5 ;._ ' _ r- ' , _ ' .-., -I I!
I |- "k|' .a.! r|.::._ g 1- . qr I |_ . F L . -II L _
|=|5 |_ p -. .-. .* ,* -1,-H .,|l,gg5 E:g |_ - @ = tr
. I \ I P, t:-P I-Eh l_ k |..,|' P-er} 1. Pl .|- - I hi -Ll I -4 - I |
r. ...... ..:....s...-.. _ .-.:-{J 5 s""--la-ll tr! -= _ ""' ! * = --F - . - . 1 . - --
.lS.l.ltl~ th ' if @._ Fl* _ ' _ ' $...-.- A ... * ._ ........_ -......@_ _ ._ E. . P, ! v_ _ ,_ _ :* r
flll ill H IPPI - '
@ ""' _ _ I @ 00 1 - ' null."
lint-I at Mun. Tern (E7 -1 1;
r
@1@ ~ @ Q
I-|--1-lieu-I. _ --q
U . ... -_
_ DIH II Earvitlt-I
1 _ . |' 0|JC.l' 0 CH LIG
--_ H urt.-.1 .. _ :'
L _ ._ l,
\-
qr.
JI\
' - I - I II I - ' -|| | 0' .. - |
I0 0 ' . "0 * 0 ' - at -' ' .-"Q0 .0-' 1?--.' ii"0P.-00 ' 0"~ 0=": ' .' .00 0 0' = -" .' -"' 0
| hrmurrurrl _Elir.r' tt.|,' -,' - g ll:
, I-vs Mmtvrl- l Frw r. h._ ng"-Fermi Danni
Dliiiinqllgiu-qunid fron0 . - ;"' -"' * _ _ .' .;: u;_ ' _ + :_ _ r_ _ _ .|
* _ _ ' ' "* |-I I' . . |II. * |-I-1 ilIIIII._ _ _ _ _ ii _ _ ._ | -_ I_ |-....-|_ _ _ :,-r - _
E i.eggar00:0lr0|' T00i:|0itoIlii . . , .. 00000 - | I I "' '
0_ ' ;' _ I|.0_ _ K I I _ R1 _ ' _ I .
_ ' lIII|IFii_ _ T7 - ii _ I_ _ _
1111
' .-;;_ _ .._ .._ _ :,-_ . ..
mfi
-r ' ;i-E~
-\..' - .._ _
; ...;-;\.3 .f.;e.ri,_ ;._ -g.00l0* ' .i0,;'
' .- I e.t.."..
0' 0?0"IIE' _ llsselist l p.0....l _ ' _ 0,_ 0. ' J:7 -. I -
ilmrdl . _ _ _ l_ H _ - - 00 00000 ' 0
lulfitnlul I Mr. 1 "- ' I "" 000000000 00 00 II 000' 0' 0000 ' 000"
P-mu. E0"f H "-I K...
I-"it Mlnnrml From ' H EB 0 1 LRAh-eve Perm. Datum _ 1 D.F..,.,_ _ _ _ 5 L_ _ _ _ _
Drilling Menwred from t3 .,|l_ _ gt
.. | ..-. . _ ... _ .\_ .,,,, .
I 0' 0
E0! -, 0 * ' _ 2a_ _ _ ' _ _ _ _ 1_ _ _ L _ _ H _ I_ _ ' ._ _ H _ L_ _ _ _ _ _ |- _ _ _ .
' 0 ' ." 0 . I .~ ,' ,.. Iv,-.
:_ "|.|l-u_ _ _ ._ _ _ |I - - _ _ _ _ _ _ r_ _ ._ _ L _ _ _ _ _ -3 -. I l-.-.- L
It-I. or [ $111! ]
In fl-ll.
[ Blh:Drill' ar 0 I
' P! _ - 00
rn. H Interval
I. Interval _
. . _ .-
.._ nn||.-|_ _ ||- - _ _ -,...,|_ _ _ _ _ _ _ . :_
- ' . . _ I. .' _ -_
-1-" .|.||r_ _ |-H
_ "L ' 4--' _ 1' -Fl - I"' - - - our-urn. .
. I - -
Ill ' 1' -_ 1I-I-|_ |-|,.q_ -_ _ _ ' I _ _ _ ' _ . '
. - -- lTIu|ul.1_ -- _ 1-_
1
I
rilln ' 00" """ "" - ""- -4-
-! -III-I_ ' _ rm-14-1 _ - _ _ H _ .._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ' _ _ _
E 1II' _ _ -
' t' 1! vr' -' "i"-I
l_ -ilsl
E!
_ _ _ W _ T lnj - _ _ _
pl-1 U iuid l.au_ _ ~ _ -_ _ L - m|| _ _ _ , _ ' "' . m| ' _ ' . :|:_ ' ;|
...... et00emrI! I: 0-0 0 i 000: 0000 00 0 000' "
I- ' @al.iIr.....5 . L "_ " "* --as -- "' 1 --- -F
F ii . --iL L- H _ _ I I _ _ - -_ _
(nil H int TlmE._ _ -_ _ -I ' |= _ _ ega-
l' I
E1-"iE|0?@_ ' I
4 00' ;-"0l".il
e--iss
- _ _ _ ;:._
04. -r-he
".m_ -_ _ _ _ _ -I _ .
- IIIIII
uerlmi Inn:_ _ _ -_ -0 0L - -
-1- { .- F I
it
, W ' T _ _ _ " " Ii0000-- Fl' | - ' _ -
0 0 I0 0 0 0 06% ? 0 0000 0000:0000 5 ' - 0' i~ - 0000 0| 000000000000. ~ 00 01000000: -car 00000000000000 0- 0000 a0i0_ ' 0_ _ -00.0.! 1' 0000000000000.0d lv 0 1-' 00:? 1
~ "_ ... --aw i . ~
I
nttufin-iii ' " " ' _ "' " av" - ~ ---.-F
.' _ @0' * t=.* ~ .irer- I -
0i2lrrul~ =gi_ aa00$ivigg4_ _ - 1000_ _ I_ . 00; .- . _ ! "?" --' {"' ""- ="* "
Logggronloltpll I _ - Q0 0_ _ _ 000J -0.00 "" I
.. -. 1 - op, _ ' |=j "I ~ - * 5
i0_ E13 [ fr.T|Le< e|lsn0j000l10i |H I000000[ 00 . 0' 0 . """ 00"
.4-arr;
H ! -. 1' 0- .-' _ _ _ =-00-Q3 1. _ .
' I- 1:5 ?
.' -' .' ' .
_ _ I
-I-1..I _ i.-0-
.' , ;. ._ |_ ._ -I r. ;
1.;-.1" -_ .-_ .-_ -.-
s
.. 1- :' 0 :. II
.- 1
In
-- . .- .1. _ ._ 1,
Fig. 4.41 Log heading of Example 4.7 (courtesy Chevron U .S.A. lnc.).
_ _ .. . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1"
1|. If |
3 ..
Ci
4.3
a.
b.
Ce
d.
B.
What are the minimum and maximum borehole diameters
indicated by the microcaliper in this interval?
b. What is the thickest mudcake buildup in this interval?
If the z one between 8 ,8 91 ft and the bottom of the hole
is shale, explain why part of it is washed out and the other
is not.
Fig. 4.47 shows the heading of a microlog, and Fig. 4.48
shows the mud leg recorded as the tool is lowered into the
borehole. Compare the mud-log and mud-sample resistivi-
ties at BH T.
4.4 Examine the log heading of Fig. 4.49.
On linear graph paper, plot the maximum recorded tem-
perature v_ s. depth.
Is the assumption of linear thermal gradient acceptable in
this case?
Find the mathematical depth! temperature relationship for
the subject well.
Plot a cross section of the well.
Calculate the mud and mud-filtrate resistivities of the drill-
ing fluid sampled for the eight log runs at T5 F. Plot R,,,f
vs. Rm. Does a strong correlation exist between these two
parameters? Can this relation be predicted by any of the
methods discussed in this chapter?
4.5 At the time of logging, the resistivity of a 10-lbmlgal drill-
ing mud is measured with an instrument on the surface. A
value of 1.5 2 Q-meter is obtained at a temperature of 90F.
3 .. What is the apparent salinity of the mud?
b. What is the estimated mud resistivity at a depth of 8 ,600
ft in the hole where the formation temperature is 18 0F?
c. Estimate the resistivities of the mud filtrate at 90 and
18 0F.
d. Can you justify the statistical approximation for predomi-
nantly NaCl muds:R,,,f=0.?5 R,,,?
e. Estimate the resistivity of the mudcake at 18 0F. '
f. Can you justify the statistical approximation for
predominately NaCl muds:R,m.=l.5 R,,,?
4.6 Determine the values of Rm, Rm}-, and R,,,,._ . at 10,000 ft if
mud weight=16 lbmlgal, mud resistivity=0.42 0- m at 7 5 F,
and geothermal gradient=l.lFl100 ft.
4.7 Fig. 4.5 0 shows a composite plot of mud temperatures meas-
ured in wells drilled along the Tuscaleose trend in Louisiana.
a. Explain why data points do not lie on the same straight line.
b. Find the parameter TS and my of Eq. 4.18 for the Tus-
caleose trend.
c. What Thy, would you expect in a 24,000-ft well drilled
along the trend?
4.8 Figs. 4.5 1 and 4.5 2 shew the headings of two legs run in
the same borehole. Examine the two headings and then
provide the following information:
a. Apparent drilling-fluid salinity.
b. Depth from sea level of a formation top shown by the leg
at 5 ,603 ft. _
c. The best estimate of the static formation temperature at
total well depth.
d. Geothermal gradient.
e. R,,,f and Rm at the 5 ,603 -ft formation.
4.9 Estimate the static formation temperature from the following
data (from Ref. 3 0):depth =7 ,646 ft, drilling stopped=22:00
C
lic
k
t
o
b
u
y
N
O
W
! P
D
F
-
X
C
hange V
ie
w
e
r
w
w
w
. d
o
cu-trac
k
.
c
o
m
C
lic
k
t
o
b
u
y
N
O
W
! P
D
F
-
X
C
hange V
ie
w
e
r
w
w
w
. d
o
cu-trac
k
.
c
o
m
MEASUREMENT ENVIRONMENT
B5
i -
4-..-' PH Hi t.1vvPtt-
tavdi -__g_IaBJ,-__* '
- 1.
I
,. Us _} cosv;\~ ]g~ ..;: ta 1aetr n..s._ " '- av-
e: ' --
" " >
at;-1-5
~ t - -.=_ ' Us-E-10..
W
abl e I
_C'.
TEL:
5 .
HI
5 !.5 ?.
tes-Hi t.-D
-e
-Il 'I" "
.. . -1 .. =-'4
,_.,=.~ ='~ t ._.~ .~ f:-f=* 4-* i ..-5 5 I-,_,sq . 11 Q11 3111zgwi i ~ 41.
w r -1 r -- " gt. no
Eu I 1- yr Hm
.'P.l l tRl :A P-'12." ,-' PF???" _
\ .._
I
Y .
* 0-e-T -fur : i s -__- ;-_-_ ' .
Zr __" I
'1 i f'-I:
'11. i i , .__
bl , .-, " _
'15 '_i :I-
.1 '' -.
'. " .=:,_,,
._-as _ " __:,,.': " ' _.:' ; 131:. 1* ' -as -* * ='-
" 'i ..r \ _-.-:1 t-T
' .s .1" :-;'-.4243
+
:1; ~ r :E:'..- so
1-" - 1-;
:-QT?
FfEs c?:i U:~ r " ~ 3
D W
_ IT X. _ _._ _ T W _ _
RunHe
l H-l i t I. 1-l . | -| 1 H .
1
D nl l er T
T -_ _ - -F _ 1* It- 1 _| -* __.,
JIHI-I -- __ 1--n I-e| II| Ie--1- _IIl l I_ I-l p-| i .e,.q __
_ l i - '.
Tgpl nter vel I . _ 1' T; ' - ' -1 ' ' . . ~ .T
' --" " '" ----? T -l --- '- --_H - ;_ l 1 _ 1 I " '1'"
I'I'l eel = i nI!r vn_I| ____ _ _ ' . ;__i __ l ____ " ___ _.__
---=" _" -'- I " ' ' _ _u | _ @ _p_ _ -- I -1- .| Il eeI| I-er . L..- _ I " I _ - T '__ 'T'I ' TTT ':'-
F" I l ' ___
Il l i l _:
.-'-L 1.1- _ r - 1 -" . " '-" '1 " " ,
_ | -i r I I I _.T.i ____& _- _ _i _ I _ __
ne. l __\\" i I-e
4
4 1.
.___| I| --~ ' . ' __ _ . ---__| . _ ---
D e . . " - ' _
._ " _--" _'_'.n| l l -| _'_. __| __ _ 11 | -u _-__---__-" _ __ q _
-ml ! ' ml " ' ml
Ii __| | e.______.1_ I-| _ -_'| Il Ir " ' -.'_ '_'.l IL___ _-f.| _ _-__
| F | _T T' 'T'?'#' ' TI-T:'-I'--'- - l l F_T" TT T. __.__. __ '_- ___
. 1'1
-fl
ajl gv
at
Im Meet l i mp
E @ - El
QIWT
-'- .1; 5 .5 ;._" _r - ', _'.-., -I I!
Ie " k| '.a.!r | .::._g 1- . q r I | _ . F L . -II L _
| =| 5 | _p -. =-. .* ;-1,-H.,| ,gg5 E:q | _ - @ = tr
1 I\ I P, t:-P I-Eh l _k | ..,| ' P-er } e Pl ,| - 1- I hi -Ll I -4 - I |
F. -_... ..-1......-. ..-. _.-.t-gr =:=-we-1 tr !-=_ 11'" -.'* * 1 ---~ - . _, . ~
1.! i i " -l '1:\:'L:-:5 -4' R" . @ l IL_._ 1-| I| e H .5 4] 1" . .. 1 Fi l l " '.'.._ Fn,_=| Ie-'r :1-
Cl r cul nl l enStepped . - ' , '
@ " " ' __| @ I. 1 - ' nee."
the-I et Meet. Ter n @ T' -1 1;
r
@ 1@ ~ @ Q
I-| --1-l i eu-I. _ -.-.-
Ul hel Ser vi ces:
; _ Q FD CICHLIG
--_ Hor t.-.1.. _:'
L _. _l , _:1
q r .
JI\
' - I - I II I - '-| | | T .. - |
I ' '. " i I ' - -~ 1- -' '.-C. .Q'-'1?--.'i I" 'P.-T " " 5 " : r ." '~ ' " = -" .' -" "
| Per manent _ EIe'e.r 'K.l ,,,._,'-I- ti :
, I-we Metwer l Fr w | . t| | _evg'-Per m. D el uei
or 1l 1aq i _r a-some fr or e' . - ;" '-" ' * __i ;: a;_-_,f;_,___.,,|
17-Ei l r sstaat 5 * " " ." " T. E----~ -.. -- - 1-'~ * -~ . ----
'_';'_Il .'__K I I TR1_'_ I .
_ Tl III| IFi i _ _ T7 - i i _I___
1111
'.-;g__4_..__:,-_. _.
mfi
-r ';i -E~
-\..'- ..__
; ...;-;\.3.j'.;o.r i ,.;..g.'
'.- I o.t.." ..
i i r l r t l l sssl i e" I p....-I 4;. ' J:2- . I -
e-r or r l oi dl . ___l _H_ - - T " T T
Wl tneue I Mr . 1 " - ' I 'T' TTITTTL '1 T II _r TTT'_T" "
P-mu. E" f H" -I K...
I-" i t Meenr r er l Fr om ' HEB ' 1 LRAh-eve Per m. D tum _1 D .F..,.,____5 L_____
D r i l l i ng Mentor ed fr om 5 ,1, _ H
.. | ..-. . _ ... _.,_.,,,, .
I It
13- -, ' * ' _2a_ _-_ '____1___L __H_I__' .__H_L____ __| - ___ .
' ' ' ." ' . I .~ ,',.. Iv,-1
:_" | .| e-u___.___| I --_ ____ _r ____ _ L _____ -3-. I -.-; L
It-I. er [ el d]
Infl -l l .
gpl hi l fl r i l l er I I _J" _L_ I__ ___
, ' H . - T. H_'_T ':'l .I. .' ,~ .
r n. HInter val
I
-: _.ee-r ___ H-_-____ _ ___ I
I - - . -__ __ r ,_._+:-_._
5 -1 I-l l
T " IT' ' 4--'_ 1'-Fl - I" '- - - an-vet. .
4- er I I - - - _ _| | | -| __. ' 1' -_'| I-I-!_ | -| ,.q _-___' I-_ __ ___'_ __ ___ _
El l e - - " ' F
1
I
YET." ___I W. I. '1-i i 3- I i f _ ____L_
1-III-ue.'_ tel l -o| . _ --i t __, _.H_.._ r ____ __ _
IE l .o_Q_l | 'tIer e_d _
't'1!tIf" -" " 1" -I .
ni t} _ l .e_ er
I
E!
D e
F
u
IT
I'l l -
fl ! Iti ='l ='* ....._._." ..I _ ml ! ....--__ 5 .i " =T:I:T:;.'|
r te et Eemr l l e - I _ ' TT ' "
-l l -I i l l -I__ - __ _ _
_ F
IIIIL _
E i Il ';L__
J1 _
1| -e__ _-__ --_ _ ___!
as-
1
" st:-l s
ti
at--I s" -E-.4: s-ts
'E_'-Q-1 " " i " .i l
E @ 4-
H r I 13.
l -@ Hen: temp _| _1_____
r s Meet TIME -
'-" 'r -- | -' _.F_-_1 ___ -__-_
G r
_ BI
enter Itmi ti me -
_i i _
II__
| -
- IIIIII
" -_-_r .' _
, W ' T__ T " " Ii _m--Fl '| - ' _-
- - -- as- - -. .=- 11'" . .-." ." " " " '. * '.* .'r _." ... " .'.'I'..i .-':'.* '~ .II.l -I~ ." -" " " " " '?' H5 . QBRUHH.t- ..--:. . -.'- 111-; ~ '-5 -.I.vg~ _f-t
m[ El l -II '
t= w=~ =~ =-aa" a'.- ee T'" -- "
.13 ti es ' " " " _ " ' " ea" '- ~ ---.-F
4Ts i * 1-~ i - '- " T5 ." -'
;?i ;;'1 . -=
-er I I
i f TLfTTff' El -1-;;1_i , t - . 0 .
ci atml asw- e_ on ._. _ I 1-.-~ --1;-1-:4----=~ -E
" . I ' I D ___ _' ___ I ' - I l .| _:'_ _
i _E15 gr .i '| 'ta a| Iaa'_gB'0'Tl al | t~ l l T" F[ " [ T . L . 1' " J"
as-ea;
H!-. 1' -.-_ A-T.-Q 'I.' _.
' I- 1:5 ?
.'-'.' '.
__ I
-I-1..I _i .-I
.', ;. ._| _._-Ir .;
1.;-.1" -_.-_| -_-.-
-e-
.. e :" :1 II
.- 1
e
....,. ,. 1 ,1,-__.-I __.-_-.1
__.. . _____ __ _ I
Fi g. 4.41Log headi ng of Exampl e 4.7 (cour tesy Chevr onU.S.A. l no.) .
1| . If |
H.
b.
c.
4.3
a.
b.
Ce
d.
B.
What ar e the mi ni mumand maxi mumbor ehol e di ameter s
i ndi cated by the mi cr ocal i per i nthi s i nter val ?
What i s the thi ckest mudcake bui l dup i nthi s i nter val ?
If the zone between8,89 1 ft and the bottomof the hol e
i s shal e, expl ai nwhy par t of i t i s washed out and the other
i s not.
Fi g. 4.47 shows the headi ng of ami cr ol og, and Fi g. 4.48
shows the mud l og r ecor ded as the tool i s l ower ed i nto the
bor ehol e. Compar e the mud-l og and mud-sampl e r esi sti vi -
ti es at BHT.
4.4 Exami ne the l og headi ng of Fi g. 4.49 .
Onl i near gr aph paper , pl ot the maxi mumr ecor ded tem-
per atur e v_s. depth.
Is the assumpti onof l i near ther mal gr adi ent acceptabl e i n
thi s case?
Fi nd the mathemati cal depth!temper atur e r el ati onshi p for
the subject wel l .
Pl ot acr oss secti onof the wel l .
Cal cul ate the mud and mud-fi l tr ate r esi sti vi ti es of the dr i l l -
i ng fl ui d sampl ed for the ei ght l og r uns at T5 F. Pl ot Rmf
vs. Rm. D oes astr ong cor r el ati onexi st betweenthese two
par ameter s? Canthi s r el ati onbe pr edi cted by any of the
methods di scussed i nthi s chapter ?
4.5 At the ti me of l oggi ng, the r esi sti vi ty of a10-l bml gal dr i l l -
i ng mud i s measur ed wi th ani nstr ument onthe sur face. A
val ue of 1.5 2 Q-meter i s obtai ned at atemper atur e of 9 0F.
3.. What i s the appar ent sal i ni ty of the mud?
b. What i s the esti mated mud r esi sti vi ty at adepth of 8,600
ft i nthe hol e wher e the for mati ontemper atur e i s 180F?
e. Esti mate the r esi sti vi ti es of the mud fi l tr ate at 9 0 and
180F.
d. Canyou justi fy the stati sti cal appr oxi mati onfor pr edomi -
nantl y NaCl muds: Rmf=0.?5 R,,.,?
e. Esti mate the r esi sti vi ty of the mudcake at 180F. '
f. Can you justi fy the stati sti cal appr oxi mati on for
pr edomi natel y NaCl muds: R,,,L.=l .5 R,.,,?
4.6 D eter mi ne the val ues of Rm, Rm}-, and R,,,,._. at 10,000 ft i f
mud wei ght=16 l bmfgal , mud r esi sti vi ty=0.42 2 - mat 75 F,
and geother mal gr adi ent=l .l Fi 100 ft.
4.7 Fi g. 4.5 0 shows acomposi te pl ot of mud temper atur es meas-
ur ed i nwel l s dr i l l ed al ong the Tuscal oose tr end i nLoui si ana.
a. Expl ai nwhy datapoi nts do not l i e onthe same str ai ght l i ne.
b. Fi nd the par ameter TS and my of Eq . 4.18 for the Tus-
cal oose tr end.
c. What Thy, woul d you expect i na24,000-ft wel l dr i l l ed
al ong the tr end?
4.8 Fi gs. 4.5 1and 4.5 2 show the headi ngs of two l ogs r uni n
the same bor ehol e. Exami ne the two headi ngs and then
pr ovi de the fol l owi ng i nfor mati on:
a. Appar ent dr i l l i ng-fl ui d sal i ni ty.
b. D epth fr omseal evel of afor mati ontop shownby the l og
at 5 ,603 ft. _
c. The best esti mate of the stati c for mati ontemper atur e at
total wel l depth.
d. G eother mal gr adi ent.
e. Rmf and Rmat the 5 ,603-ft for mati on.
4.9 Esti mate the stati c for mati ontemper atur e fr omthe fol l owi ng
data(fr omRef. 30) :depth =7,646 ft, dr i l l i ng stopped=22:00
8 6
TH EORY, MEASU REMENT, AND INTERPRETATION OF WE' LL LOGS
3 002ft
en Siz e I43 / 4in.- -+
II 3 / 4il1. Casing
|3 ,?25 ft.
I6in.Cosing -' ~
I
i I
Bit$i1e 8 ' / gin * 4 I TEMPERATU RE,I: I
0---
I -I00-soar o ?{}vFIOO z oo aoo 40o
01 vi rte ~ v| . ~ ,
O00ft
iii
II
DEPTH
B
I2
I5
: SIZ E in. _ "' | 24L.
TEMPERATU RE,F
' \
' \
\ "\
\. \ ,
\\ \\ I
4 " M \
| \ ti
~ x
\ x
\
\ \
-,1
_ \ \gG=I.4IFr'
x \ ,
\ \ ,
\ \
\ X
\
\
\
|\\
no.2 lbm/ gal 2 3 * 5
I I
95 / 8 in, Casi ng I r
1 Fig. 4.43 Temperature data of Example 4.? plotted on linear
I scales.
I6,5 94ft. , , Iwlbm/ gal a -
lbmfgal).
on the second day of the month, circulation stopped=02:3 0
on the third day of the month.
Thermometer Time Off
Depth
Tool? _ (ft)_
Bottom
' (iiI11 1da l
6: Tm
(beasts) PF) 11
' i' ,608
"L608
7 ,620
T,620
Sonic
DIL
I-DC
SNP
Nomenclature
A = area, ftz
C = constant
"nICJ-?"a.
= depth, ft
hIIIC
its
0?' :3 6fthird
12:48 ="thircl
14:29t' third
20:3 Tfthird
in Eq. 4.17
= formation resistivity factor
gs = geothermal gradient, Ff 100 ft 24 # -
h = formation thickness, ft " "
2 mudcake thickness, ft = :29. 4.::1--Temperature data of Example 4.? plotted on semi
=- thermal conductivity, caloriessec-cm-C) B . _ .
5 :06 99
10:18 106
14:29 107
18 :07 110
P
OOOff
Ii
DEPTH
41$
I
Iii-
7 3 IOO 200 3 ' 00 400 5 09
_ _ ' _ mi. ' 1' ' " 1 I I
20,5 5 6 rt TD 16.4 Ibm/ goi \
I 4 \ I
V Fig. 4.42 Croea section of the Well in Example 4.? (ppg- \\
I I
, \
, 2
| I
I
= diameter, in. 20
= diameter of invasion, in. , 5
C
lic
k
t
o
b
u
y
N
O
W
! P
D
F
-
X
C
hange V
ie
w
e
r
w
w
w
. d
o
cu-trac
k
.
c
o
m
C
lic
k
t
o
b
u
y
N
O
W
! P
D
F
-
X
C
hange V
ie
w
e
r
w
w
w
. d
o
cu-trac
k
.
c
o
m
THEORY, MEASUREMENT AND INTERPRETATION OF WELI
t: I6i n.Cosi ng -'~
3002 ft.
en Si ze I43/ 4i n.--4.
II 3/ 4i l 1. Casi ng
I a I
I
Bi t$ i ze 8'/ gi n. * 4 ' TEMPERATURE ; I
O
O00ft
i i i
II
D EPTH
4
B
I2
I5
: SIZE In. _" '| 24L.
" X
| \ \
-,1
I \ \\
_ \gG | 41F. *
, _ K |
| 3,?25 tr . 10.2 l bm/ gol 2 5
I
9 5 / i n, Cu i n I
8 S g 1 I Fi g. 4.43Temper atur e dataof Exampl e 4 T pl otted onl i near
I scal es.
16,5 9 4 1 1 | l .8l bm/ got ea _ - ~ ,
l bmfgal ) .
.... 4 -
onthe second day of the month, ci r cul ati onstopped=02:30
onthe thi r d day of the month.
Ther mometer Ti me Off
D epth Bottom
Tool ? _ (ft) _ - _(_ i I]l }-" [ I3.Z) __
6: Tm
(beasts) PF) 0.
I608
" L608
7,620
T,620
0?':36fthi r d
12:48=" thi r cl
14:29 " thi r d
20:3Tfthi r d
Soni c
D IL
I-D C
SNP
Nomencl atur e
A = ar ea, ftz
C = constant i nEq . 4.17
" =i ICJ-?~ o.
= di ameter of i nvasi on, i n.
depth, ft
= for mati onr esi sti vi ty factor
-1--
gs = geother mal gr adi ent, Ff 100 ft 24 --
h = for mati onthi ckness, ft t _ I t d r i i i
2 mudcake thi ckness, ft = :29 . 4.::1--Temper atur e dataof Exampl e 4 7 p o te onaem
, , e e.
ther mal conducti vi ty, cal or i essec-cm-C) _
hl l i
kh 2
5 :06 9 9
10:18 106
14:29 107
18:07 110
P
OOOff
Ii
D EPTH
TEMPERATURE F
-I00-ED ?-' 0 7nvFI00 200 300
U T" T; 1 T I I ' I " I
78 IOO _ 200 OO4OO 5 00
I I \
20,5 5 6 r t TD 16.4 Ibm/ got \
Fi g. 4.42Cr oeasecti onof the Wel l i n Exampl e 4.? (ppg- \\
I 1 I
, \
41$
I
Ii i -
| I
= di ameter , i n. 20 G
- 5
, 2
ti;
MEASU REMENT ENVIRONMENT B?
H OLE DIAMETER (inches) I I
5 II] 15 I
T1 ""' ' 7 - -- - 1 - -.-_ ;_ _ _ _
I
3 0
- MICROCALIPER '
;;.e' F
-,I_ .L._ :_ ,_
EH 16
+ l_ L
, Iier s v ion 1213 415 16
i I |, | i 1 Ii l I
-H ";-
t-==
-;-1+
IITIJU "' - ' "
_ _ _ _ _ - -' -- - .-| |- v--r|r1L|1
_ _ ._ _ _ _ .._ _ ._ _ ._ ..-.. .:._ . _ _ _ .|
I _ _ _ - -_ - - "I" - i I
- -- I _ _ _ J '
s_ _ -! iE f""* I-Ii-r
M
ungr-
_ ,_ I -L
-A.
if - - - - --- --- 3 Arm Ben Spring
PI
_ CaIIpura_ ' :_ ;_ ---.{.- ~ -_ Y I
if I1 fiiiilii ' * "" P" I I I
P ;j;
I! Illi all
._ _ l _ _ ;;-: ' | ----" --
lll
I
ur
-.=;.
f I
113 00 ._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
-1-
f
i v v r i i i' ;f;f;i;i;_ "I _ --_ i
"u* t' * ?* % v* r$*
_ i_ .L..l_ ..L| '
CIDH E!
|-I-
II I Q e
av I
iv
1|-
-1-
' _ _ _ _ _ " "' 6 _ ' "' ' 1' '
Fig. 4.45 CaIiper log of Problem 4.1. _ " "' ""' ' " ' ' -
.|.._ .,_ . .. .._
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Kin
"11"
H
Q
R...
in I-ta i-' Z 1l:"U
5 &3 + aE njfui E
2
a.s' ,,,
Sxo
r
6:
11:
11
-n-H
an
-n |
-up
illi-
i
-| n-
-1
T:
T,
Tr
T...
T.
Vmf
p
pm
ti
-in
-1-I
-in-n
.-|-||
1|-
.,,_ _ .:_ ._ ,._ ._ _ _ i
?* ' "":::;;
i:-
I I-" giql I . I
i i I"
{- _ _ _ --- _ _ - - --- -
coefficient that varies with mud weight
constant in Eq. 4.18
saturation exponent
heat flow rate, calisec I ~ E E c--"
. . . I _ _ t.
mud resistivity, Q-m .
mudcake resistivity , 1-m 5 ;-_ I
_ . _
tar
I II: I I
It!
_ _ _ _ . _ . . _ ._ _ ,
I
mud-ltrate resistivity, Q-m i
resistivity of uninvaded z one, Q-m i _ _
formation vvater resistivity, * m EI " 1-_ I
I-' . ' ;' 1I ' _ w_ _ _ _ ..- Q
I ,. _ --- --l_ _ _ _ _ -
I . I \ _
resistivity of flushed z one, Q-m I s --_ - - - I
oil saturation, fraction _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I ,
residual oil saturation, fraction E E
vvater saturation, fraction _ _ _ '
_ it ll---._ I oi-
..|ll|Ii|l||IIsIlit Il! II-III.-k _ . Z _ Jli , 1
.--i--.L_ _ -* + -+ -... a.-I-"' 1 I
nose
variation in water saturation r .._ .. _ _ .' ..'
1--._ _ _ .
saturation of mud ltrate in flushed z one, fraction p -- --- --- 1
mud circulation time, hours .;_ ;1;
time since mud circulation stopped, hours --
t@mP 1' l11IB, F : I :;;;* ;;;
mean annual temperature of air, F * ;
_ Il-
static formation temperature, F _ _ ~ _ -_ e_ _ -- -
mud temperature, F
temperature near surface, F I
mud ltrate volume, cm3 I
density, gicn' i3 . i - I-- -- ~ - -- -=- - ---
mud density, lbmfgal r _ || t 5
F .4.46 MI I fP hi 4.2.
porosity, fraction _ _ lg Gwen em
_ _ . .._ :1 p * H ole Diameter in Inches '
_ _ _ |
* I
I I
C
lic
k
t
o
b
u
y
N
O
W
! P
D
F
-
X
C
hange V
ie
w
e
r
w
w
w
. d
o
cu-trac
k
.
c
o
m
C
lic
k
t
o
b
u
y
N
O
W
! P
D
F
-
X
C
hange V
ie
w
e
r
w
w
w
. d
o
cu-trac
k
.
c
o
m
MEASUREMENT ENVIRONMENT
,,.II-III _J_
-1-.1
Ti _..t , _f,l _._L
E
Io- -II @ -o E E G -D i In
_ ____ _-__ ___ __ __
_ _ _ _ I 4
I" .
T_' " " ' ' 7- --- 1 - -.-_;_ __ _
I
HOLE D IAMETER (i nches) I I I
~ I 1 I I MICROCAIIPER
I5 16
Ii l I
Inns - -- __--
_ ___ Hol e D i or neter i n Inches
I I
?l !!5 Ei , I
I
I * 'T+
. -Ii :
I
I
I I
__-- _.._ _.__ ._..-.. _.:._. __ _.
| ' ___ __
__f;'.___ _ . _ ___,__
ta-
l i L
-A.
- '_ - I =~ I~ I~ M
.I..
I
r u-
Cal i per s _ I '_':_ _:_" " .'_." * " -_ ---
1-t
J; -
i i - - - - --- 3 Ar mBur r Spr i ng __
IUI W
+-t? I!!L- ui l mt
.| - .'_| _;
i I" ;a__
3| -l 1d3CI
f I
uses 1-:
-
I,-
. :5
I I
I
-_-
f
-.- - _ 7:? I --- - _-1:: -- --- --- _ _ . -
___ I " '" -' " " J Inui t,-::a,:i t
_i _.L..l _..L| '
_.In ...?
| -
i f-
1| -
-1-
._ ..__.: .-. ..__ _
_ ___ ______
Fi g. 4.45 CaIi per l og of Pr obl em4.1. _" ;' I'" E '' E-
Km
" 11"
H
Q
Rm
c -I I-ta ;-1:1?-I
E013 ocq i d pd-.:'U--g
2
a.s',,,
Sxo
r
6:
T
It
Tr
a.
a
Vmf
to
pm
ti -*
11:
11
-n-H
an
i p
-n|
-up
i l l i -
i
-| n-
-1
-In-nI
.-| -| I
1| -
__ -.._
* -F,
II
-.., '
IE
II
. I: -.|
IfI.I. I.
.I
II I
. Ii
i i ,. I ..
f" " " r {- ___--- __- - --- -
coeffi ci ent that var i es wi th mud wei ght _-...
I-I-P
-I-I
constant i nEq . 4.18
+l __.. Ir
II
-ti
TL
I I I
SEIIUITIIIIUII CXIIJD HEIIII
ant
II Il L-_
It!
heat fl ow r ate, cal i sec
mud r esi sti vi ty, Q-m
mudcake r esi sti vi ty , 1-m
___ __.__. I . Z. . ___.
mud-l tr ate r esi sti vi ty, 0 - m
I __ _ ___ ___ .
r esi sti vi ty of uni nvaded zone, Q-m
for mati onwater r esi sti vi ty, 0* m
_. . I: . -
E: *
e~ ~
r esi sti vi ty of fl ushed zone, Q-m
oi l satur ati on, fr acti on
I
II-
CID BE!
r esi dual oi l satur ati on, fr acti on " " -_ .._
water satur ati on, fr acti on
.__._-_--F
I I
I-. J
I I
var i ati oni n water satur ati on r ..__. _ _.'..'
satur ati onof mud l tr ate i n fl ushed zone, fr acti on
1--._ _ _
mud ci r cul ati onti me, hour s ..._;
1; I
* -
ti me si nce mud ci r cul ati onstopped, hour s __
_Il -
temper atur e, F
" H" * ' III I-r
meanannual temper atur e of ai r , F t ;
...II
; I
'-t.
3I
stati c for mati ontemper atur e, F ~ -4 -- -
l l
mud temper atur e, F
temper atur e near sur face, F
mud l tr ate vol ume, cm3
densi ty, gIcn13 . i -I-I----~ -L -
mud densi ty l bmfgal Fi g. 4.46MIcr ocal " per of Pr obl em4 2
por osi ty, fr acti on _ _ I
U068
TH EORY, MEASU REMENT. AND INTERPRETATION OF WELL LOGS
J:
" t
i' I"F-' '
1-
P
-r-| I-r_ :il-||-|- ' I"l' I' l' -iv-I
TIi, t I I .
L-IJ ~
?I
.-ii.
F II-Ii
tn . I
ti use4Bsoouna 2:1:-.~ 2o
Ev
i
II;
L _
he-||-I
.-I
; .9_ Q Ii
qt-
11
COU NTY FELD or LOCATON W.n_ _ _ _ _ I5 II
Ell.
left . + .-a.- I -_ - - It .
"I' .l
~ t
, i
; I
I 4|
-I-< 1}
- -;
TIOBEII
i
-In-.|.
III|II|-
Y 411-:.... It~ IY
I. "Ila
I
1' "-
I' l-IIIKI
-p-u-H -|--
,1--I
I }
|'
i
IEOMLPIANY
11_ -+
CTP
I 1.
E Ll ,_ ..,:.: _ \_ --_ _ I,-I-_ _ l_ I,-' 1-_ -I
Irlpnf: ' II"I_ ,,I";,_ I' -H 0
i iii IIt' i' II"IIIII ' 4 II' II' III! "
-I' I- nil--i
-|--in -
j_ "_ I I "CQMPANY TH E CALII' OF.NIA S
""""""' " ILI -
WELL
_ _ _ _ i 662 5
SE/ C C-LIC
II FIELD BROOKH J-WEN
: ' r- Pi i I J
uup-s.-.-..||I--Q-1?-I I - II! ..;-3 -;I:ILH
CO-1I3 A?\Ir_ + ,_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
I ' 0
.-.uq:.|i-s..H |.|-1-i-ii-.n.,,.Ir. -L ...-' 4 .' :~ J-|4-# \-I_ -|||rn|- Iii :-ul.I--L- ' # # Jn..1::hi@-;-n&bIT;rr _ p' -Q.--:1;-.1,-nun-|..|....' ,,|-p,.,,..|-_ ..... ,. _ |.,,,-_ H _ -* _ _ I,.4,.I_ ,,,,_ ._ I_ ,_ _ _ 1_ I-I\* _ _ _ _ _ . _ . H -I_ I4 , r
:"---" * 1 ' * - ' ' ' - -' - -"IIl"lIl-"' * "-4III-""- il--I-1-"\-Pd-II-"vi In -II|-I-i' \-in - ' F
SI.-Cf}
+ 1
I
I 1'
IT
I r,.."YII_ III
LOCATION QII-1...-' . .* .Q--}.~ I;]II;. h_ _ _ _ _ i' i.../ I...5 -_ - .
I lull;
' ' 1 1" "I ' ' 7 \"l""I"% I-|-\|IIl"I-Iv-i Ilr -' _ * -I-II \-1-1! -qt-lupt--- -lit-_ -..pI-1|-H I-in--I-1-I-Iilltuill "_ ' ' i|-|l|-|||. , - _ t|.-._ |- . * _ :|q:; _ :||q,_ _ Tpq- 1-1;; .-.... - ..-i. .,,,.H .v-i. .._ ... .,. ..-,..- _ .- -I-.|.-i. --- + -u-up .. r
it
Other Surve;IIIs-in
T I
I I3 ROOKIIA.' :' _ ' ?I J?-IIT I' "' I' I We
:3 : 4' 1
COU NTY L I NCOI-N,_ ,_ _ _ . ._ - Elevation:l(.B..:._ _ _ ._ .._ .
D.F.:.A_ ?.E.._
STATE... I I-II :3 I3 3 I PPI ,- I Q! G1,, _
Xi-I._ llill .._ _ ..L.._ ' lI IIFL. . _ L. _ IIlII |FQ' . II FFl._ .E_ _
. ... . . , , . . I i
-
Log Depths Measured From RDB OR I -3 . _ 5 / Ft. b BIIF
. ...... _ ....._ ..F_ ..-_ -_ _ .. _ . Q 0' 99
"""" I _ """-| _ I' --I_ .i|-III-||||_ _ |_ |-pl-q -- | ; - - - 1_ -_ - - _ _ _ -_ -_ _ - 1.-.||.,q-_ - -- _ ._ _ ._ i- _ _
_ iii
- RU N No.
I ate
. M l | I I I I I _ iii I I i - ' _ -I---H ' | --- "_ ' ?-
I I ONL. - :
H
J ' .23 ]_ _ g-5 ;} I I_ _ :"I' III _ III T I "II"I" I
F* * =* i.R;~ :=.@a. tY;aeI it iooo I ; ,0 "' """' I, I
I,9tF t=_ I.Iit! iy.IIII13 3 III r r r I
gtveiaeumdi """< .:> 2z et""* rri I L t
drew rt 7 7 he he
Betttom P;riI_ Ier-I I I T -- " _ _ _ _
Mud N01 I CA"STT GLIL I I II TIH IITIIIIFIIII I T
5 - -- ~ I-"' -' ' _ _ J-Ls-- ----.--I -I-F ...... .bl_ 1...-..:-- _ _ _ ..
I;-,.....;\,/ ii:.< =-I N-...! 4.2.._ ... I; I I
-t\Iv.sIiRr=ia! - A 1-aside I I3 4 IN jyf, , I,
-- Res. an . * 5 ?-g1 e
@._ ..
_ _ _ I_ _ _ ._ _ _
"TI
_ Jlll
@
l' \-J U 3 -5 @
:1-II
"4 -riI.
@ @ II T T II T I
1| F Ii "1,-I --* - -- I " ' "' "' -' ' -"* ' -1 - - - ' "' '
_ I _ II_ _ _ Wtr. Less I.
I I I I _ I-H -I I1 _ _ _
I I J II
\.~ a1.0
i..._ ... . 5 .-I Q0 i' P' i"? I I T
d
T iii
J13 11 5 1:11 . _ _ _ . A F5 3 29
;;'
"Tl
.-- - I - c - @
I7 ..--R_ a1;._ i_ a I
C)
-l.5 ._ @_ _ 216 @ PI _
-5
III' I.4! .=I_ .I.I..9$.1-f..II1* ' i;..II Q;_ 04 [ If ,,:,,,_ ,, I II, Q
Death 103 00 I I T T I
EETIISIIEI I; "' 5 3 T4i' I ' "' I T" * i"""" "'
III -r' '
9I4,jIv,p IIIIl IIIPt1I-A I "e crewrtree i
P=! $IJIYs4= :i1r0RA 0. ii:0 I
. _ l' _ _ I_ _ ' _ _ _ _ _ -p-
-1;-1
OPEI: Tim II 4 RS I
T11-I I< I~ I5 - _ 5 0?-00L I I IIIIIIIT I I
isecieiaeia B I I III-Itti Z IIYIIIIITI I I "TIT I TIII "ITI* IITIIJ' I"II' II' _ _ ' _ I_ ' III"
y_ -:- .
_ t _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
E ' -. II II I-;- II _ |-I- I;-_ _ T ' -I! II-' 5 ' :-I;-;--I-1 if:-I :' I||-III-II_ III _ i-|||i i i-i lie-|u||_ _ |-II-.||iIi|Ii_ -_ _ _ _ _ L-- r _ _ _ ? _ _ T|-. -' I-- ' ----
Fig. 4.4? Log heading of Problem 4.3 .
C
lic
k
t
o
b
u
y
N
O
W
! P
D
F
-
X
C
hange V
ie
w
e
r
w
w
w
. d
o
cu-trac
k
.
c
o
m
C
lic
k
t
o
b
u
y
N
O
W
! P
D
F
-
X
C
hange V
ie
w
e
r
w
w
w
. d
o
cu-trac
k
.
c
o
m
THEORY, MEASUREMENT, AND INTERPRETATION OF WELL
I I..--I=_I.~ I.n.-I.I..I
I-1-I.1- -Ir -~
I...-I.
. ' 3
\-.-" i - .
Q E | .'_ I:-,Ii I-I
' r ,'.
,,.
I
. I
I
i i ! F Y
.II| 5 .,-I.-_
" I'.l 11_-+
' I '1 I " ' '7\" l " " I" % I-| -\IIIl " I-Iv-I Il r -' _* -I-II \-1-1!-Ii -IIIQI----IIII-_-Ii i -1II| 1I-Iq --I-1-!-IIIIIIIII 1'H-| I'-| 1| | r ,__.| '\-HI=.-'-" _'1I-| l | -I| I| .,-_t| .-._| - . * _:| q :;_:| | q ,__Tpq - 1-1;; -... -.I-I.I a.,,,IH.v-I. I,-... .,. ..-,.I- _ .- -I-I-II.-I. --- +In...
. ... . -__ ,_.-1_.-
,- ..,_
I II. l l
5 L I 'l " l i 'I1'I-I III l I l I| I ._ -Q. I l i l ;
-I'I-1| - IIIIIHI-II-i
-| --In - -Imp-s.-.-..| II--Q-1?-I I - 1" ..;-3-;l ::LH
II
.-.uq :I| i u-eIIH| . | -Ii -eh-.-u.I,.'r . -1 ..| I'wI- .' :~ J-| 4-'II-I.-Il Ir I| I- II-an l #-.I- 1t _1-'I:I.__7T- -I--:1;-.1,-,n| q I-I..I..I.',,| -p,.,,.I| -_.,.., ,I _| I,,,-_H_.,* ___,.4,__,,-_ __,___1__-_\* ___ __. _. -_ __. , r _
I ---" ! -. -1- - ' ' ' -1* -' ---IIIIIII-I-I" * -~ -4I| | | I'-QM II--I-1.-" \-I- .I-I-III-II I-I-I I-| -I-41 - " Ir ' I .
1-
1-4| !-up-It ,_| e
P
..;L_____3_w
IL T__
1---I
I. I .
L-'1 -I ---
II, 11-
I
-Ii . II-Ii
Ff}
.-H. -I-I
ta use I-IBsooanaSITE-.-' ~ 2085 1.9 9 2 If
Ii
ti
VI_'
he-Io,
-I
.-,-
11
N
COUNTY FELD or LOCATOWELL
l eft . +I-aI- I -_- - It .
.Z__PI?-" IFI| I$ ' _
I
T
I
I
I
I
I
I-I-
I
-II
I
I
e
@ ..Bi -I-
i
-In-.| .
III| II| -
{Ii i -;__.. It~ IY
III
---tr
1-0| -I| I| I| I
COMPANY......
i -' IITP
Other Sur veys
1.1? ; 'Q() MPANY TIIE cnttr ozmtn I
' I L'5 " " I_ " '0-QT
CO-1I3.I7-I?\Ii _,__ _______ _ -
Locati on of Wel l
w| 5 I_I_ I Bi t0OI< IIA'.'I'_'III JIIIIT
17 062 5 *
" FIELD BROOKHA.EN
.I- _ i t }__
' G 63 4' II
. Fr -IF gr i p
JL IO I.JL.~ ..-
!;,," 'I" " * |
LOCATION QL-C.-" . 2Q--3.II;]'I; ___ _ I) 'IZ./ l .J:- I
I l ul l ;
I
:.I" II.:l l !;
I
n.
. - D .F.:.A_?.E.._
STATE - I-II 3" * I3? I
... ..._....._.. .'.,..._,.______.___ or G .l ..:_i .__
.-I.. . , _ , . . . I '
COUNTY LI~ = 0I.~ EIO\fCIIIOI1:I(..B..:. .._
PPI I
9 .Ek.et.'1$ Me_eI~ r @ q .Er om_,, RQB ,0.-=< 1.1;? II_. II-.I_= .. I~ I~ < ~ .-e,=II:i _,,.-
.RU| 7I| ;_ | ' " " " ' " ' " " " " " * " " '"
gi g_-_ H4 ' A _2_,}8._, ' I Tr " '1 T _
UNI; _r
62.
.FI.l ;f_R* _gai h_g_ I. I I5 5 130 I I I" -H" -* -I~ I
I.Cl $ I'RtJhEI'_1LHI__ " " " " " " It I ar ee to I It I
,_, ,_, _.T-_9 _ -L I-I.I5 I3
I ___.- . _. _ _
_r I=.-I.=.-IIIIIIIIIII.-.I;II< IIIII 9 2ki i i 2i " * i i I I " I * I
% MW@ Ti mT ? ave I
TB5 i l 5 7v'E?fi I.Il i .I f ___,-I_., I--f___. I- T ....
.M.II.d,1_~ 1< II.--., 3-_,c_s;sII c;tt_,___ ________ I F
F It '" I" I ' I " 1
._I3.' r 1$ -......_i Yi $ .c.II .05 -...! Fl '_42__... If .._ __
H_Res__BHT__ T J
@ ._.. _'nf
I1
1.0
-IIF!F!R$ .> t.t.!- ;__L_ _l .,--39 ,,@ . I34 IF.I._.,,___,...,-I..-.@ I ,0 4 I ._-_,_,f.O_,..]Q[
-- -. I I
n ' 5 __." @ CF- '
@ @ @ I@ I
I
l oss
'l '._
L--.Ii ~
.'l . _ l l l l l l l -I-II __ h| | | - I r IIIII __ r
I:I.~ II IIIIIII I I < :I:I:IIIIIII-
_I_ l _ _ _ 1| -IIF -III-I - -L __-- ---
Itf" | I-I-It-I-I| 'f " _'I| -r __I_.-._..,__l | I -__I_ --- -------- ------I---_ -_~ - -________ ____ ___--_--__---I_ _- ___- --
;;'
" Tl
C) | _.
" 1 I
~ x7mwi z~ @ vn* " @ state @
" z_5 _@ __ zi t-3,~ If' I @ PI I _ @ ~ " 1'!
.Mv!i ..l 9 s:..R@ .-.,If QQ34 [ Of fO1f., -,l :.}f.IIfyl i ff O I, f ff.f
QI> !hj _10300_ I I T T T I
5 i I-i I= 6 3/ 4--I I _ ,;_, I I I
_P" d.?jYP;O+I TLPIIEFA I OTOIOOOOTHO IO-LT T I I
Pi l ve :I10IzAgt. LC I I
OPE: Ti n" -I I 4 RSI O THIOIFOTFTHO
Tr uck N5 - '0 ITTISETT-COL I Om I I
Ol R1ecl or del d By I -T-_-MI-_1IIIi B_':',mjL-[ I-1____ I I " TOT I T" " " T" 'T'" " * _'__" "
_" " " '1: I - '- ---" T 1-'-_'l ?: ---- _| * | Il -I& ;r _....II-1 __,| ._ _'__ ._ I,I| I-I| j_| I-I | ,..-H _| .'| .pI| II-- -_- -- ----| ---:_:| ___.r __ . __r I
$ " l I- I Fl I ' I-" I" III-IT . l IvI| I\-nun.--r ui n.-'-T-' I - _'___'___.ET,,_i -- U _-- I I
Fi g. 4.4?Log headi ng of Pr obl em4.3.
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
MEASU REMENT ENVIRONMENT
B9
14 --
. .' I
Ilhkll
COMPANY... ..T.II .... eLl.F0{1N,lI% I_ 0I-IPi1NYI_ I_ _ 1..., O_ .]It_ :@ I
Iii; . U I I i ' R f -.I_ ..-4Q._ -@ -=
v+ .IEtt_ _ _ ._ ...-_ .-.iIR@' 3 1I< II"I' ~ -N. L* -III. ?I' .I.' ? -..,_ _ _ _ _ 22 lL_ =' 5 f@,. I I F
I . ant
neu_ > _ _ _ ....._ ._ ......ii.F.00.i:2.l! I_ ' .-i..EI_ -.-,.....-_ ...._ . - KB
DI: L. .- I
GL -
. COU N' lY._ _ ...... Li_ N.I;,_ 0_ l_ ' .-_ N _ _ _ _ _ ,STATE_ _ _ _ _ I1I_ _ ' 3 l_ _ "|PPI
PI-* 4
in--i
I11.-.
-m-- -I + -.I .
I-Z --I-I e I.|. . I
-I--|-II-n-1-J-Ii I ... . ,
I I
... -.I-.. I
I H
|I..-_ -...--.1. i,...,.,_ . I,I,._ _ _ _ _ _ I I
._ _ I I_
Apparent RII' t._ _ Ii -Il_ Q n1"I.Im
DEII1_ H _ .._ ..H ..[ ?' ..0.Q., _ fl.
i.l' II_ ..' L ' :' .' 1I".' I I... I
J-
-
I
II-I-ill-|--n-It-i-.|q.I...-._ -. + I.- ,- II ._ I II II. I II
- .1. _ _ _ I,_ _ I_ _
- I . .
M-in-ti-|1|i.| _ .||,|-|,|_ I
IEIE
I |-| ||-
...._ , ..
-n-IiI-o-In
l' I
1"! -I--I
I
i.-J- I.
_ p-.1- |_
I .- 1;:..-
It-|--ii I ---"I.- _ .I. _ .
:I | .II-
! _ L I I' -
"""""-' ' Ir* -' -I|---* -- I ... . ._
I - - . I II I
I
I i --
_ _ .I_ I
II
_ ..I -.
I I-
7 1? I.' j.."
.._ "". ;1:;:;""t..- ..
I .
_ L
_ , --.. I --
- - 1-" : ---....
H :;.; - -_ . _ _ _ -_
II
_ I. I II_ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ | .-_
--4
-1--1
_ _ |.
I.' I= -- I _ :_
II_ # :-_ .I.I_ II_ _ _ ;_ _ ]. _ ;;\r - - -|II---- .. I,.,_ ,
-\I\'
_ I
"' 1.
II. I--ii
--o--.-.
J. .i-If-.-._ -_ _ I ..
I
.. .._
.--...-"..-_ .....-_
_ _L_ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
f-1| I i
if.
-I-I - ;i_ .-: _ ]t...-......_ ...._ _ - ..
' :--I-I- - . --;-_ :;_ _ . _ .I.I..._ ..,I I_ I,_ ,_ , LI_ _ _ _
i
- -....I _
_ \- I.I_ I I L-; ,_ I .-...,|I_ _
I' I.
-=,.- - _ ,-I -- - .._ .
II
T;ii ' iquf&'
. .::-_ .-_ I -; _ --_ -_ ,-_ _ _ H II _ I_ _ _ _
+ -.- I1 I
I _ .II..
I_
... |_
...._ ._ ,,,, _ _
- - .-... I
-I.
"-III I .
=. -I. _ =..;._ .._ .....
I- .I_ .-_ ._ ...._ ,.
1--I-I-I.-_ -_ - ---. _ _ _ . _
-.I._ ._ - ._ _ _ _ _ . . ,I_ _
~ I' II_ -1:' _ I-I- I -:1-_ .-L ._ .
L._ -.
I-I--- |-|- ... .
I .' .:1...' .'
gill
Ii
-- ...... ,I.. ..
" .._ J._ ._ 5 .--
--I----I-I-- -+ |_ _ _ I
_ ...-....._ ._ _ ......_ _ ,, L... _ _ _ ,_ _ _ ,
I . -. .I
|_
+ ---I
..,...,.
1 _ _ _ ,: II _ II
I - I -.-.... -I
. . II
_ _ _ ..I._ -_ _ '
"
I
_ ._ -..I,I_ -._ .
. II_
_ I
_
' :r
I-I u,
._ I
I
I-I.
i I. .
i_ I
;._ .- ;_ I-. .... _ .
--...,
I ---
I.=---_ - _ ...._ ..._ ._ _ _ _
1|-I-..|,,.
I
. i It-
_ .._ ._ ._ II_ - _
I; r"_ "IT-' 1- :* I- ------ _ .. ...... _ .
-I_ _ - -1 T. II: ;. I.I _ ---_ _
I _ I
' -tZ l_ _ ' |
-:.-I _ .. .I,..,._
- --~ ----...--4,,
-1-I-I-I I-Ii.
I..
..;-..I:
_ ..-.' ....T7 .' ""il' i' .. - . . .
_ _ .,.....I:_ _ . I II
1 " - ==- - - II I, |- -_
-Ii-T
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I
...._ _ II_ , .
.. -.... L, . , I
"' \l-' -' --vl-|I--
-..... ...
.-.._ II_
I... ._ 1._ ._
I--.-. _ I..._ ..,I , I _ I
..II.II.._ I. _ _
I I L
"' --e-. -. -_ _ _ . ._ .._ ._
.
-I_ ' -T
_ _ I_ _ _
I _ 7 .-
I-.-...._ i.._ _ _ _
' -I-I-_ --i-
.-- _ . _ _ _ _ _
_ ;r
rI"' - -IrhIIH -I- I-u--|.-.-H I 1.....- ' _ I
_ ' in I" ' 5 - -_ - --H -:_ ' _ I-I _ : -- J"
- -I-I----H I-- lI
._ .._ .._ ._ ._ _ ._ _ .i_ ._ _ _ _ _ _ _ ,_ L_ _ _ _ _ _ I
1 "-i
I-nil-I
* F II_ " r ---
Fig. 4.4B Mud log of Problem 4.3 .
-I- p .;_ _ I- _ ...
sunvev wan some COLLAPSED
0090!
GU 20
003 0
D
D
0000
0066
0096
I-CI
J
r' \
|. |
_ ,_ ,II,_ _ ._ _ .I _ _ ' ..,...,,1"_ ,II' ,_ ;IT' :J_ _ , _ _ .II,,_ _ _ _ I,_ _ _ _ |. . .I_ _ _ _ I II: _ I IIII I_ IIII.I I:II
I I I | II | I-I _ I,. _ II
I I_ I I I III III-I.._ .|I I I . I I
-- --2--.--L.---_ J,....,.,.,. I_ _ _ _ _ IIII_ I_ _ _ _ _ _ _ :I_ _ _ _ I_ I_ I_ IIIII_ _ _ _ I_ _ I_ ?_ IIII II
I I I I I I ---"1 I ' :.1_ -.1n.
---I1 - -. _ ...,I
-1-I--I.-in _ ....,,.,_ , _ _ _ _ _ _ ,_ _ _ _ _ ]_ _ _
I 1-I .._ - _ _ _ _ _ I_ _
I ..-
II I
--..-.._ _ I.,._ _ .. I, ,
I' .' .
._ ...II. ...... II,_ _ ,_ _ I, _ _ _
. I _ ,E.- I! I 5 -
I I II' III I - I ||
I-"' l I ' ' ' 1:I -I; II+ -I-I--:1-I---III-+ |-In-I---_ |iii.-.I-.|....-.,II,.-_ ._ ,_ _ I,,I_ III,_ I-_ -I-_ III_ II_ ' I_ II_ _ -i_ IIIIII_ I_ --IIII-III.-I -I I
"-1- I I I
I - II "- ' I -- I-- I - II _ .. _ _ _ _ I I
4- -I I I I
' "' 1' ' I- |- ---.-._ ...' -._ ... .
_ -.~ - TI II T" "* 1 " " I=-"I- _
Tn I I I || II . I| I_ III I . I
"' II;_ I' I' II. I I I
_ ""I* " i =1:"' ;IIH --H M" I I I.-H --+ ~ - I==-...- -_ _ _ I . .- -.
i I.. ..
I I
I 0
I-
..
I ' I ' I II . -I -TI -: -""l' :_ ._
. I
' ' I
In "I - -I I I | - _ .. -. . .
' "I* II-' ;-II-"" ---- ._ ._ _ ..I _ , I
._ II- aI. II. I- II I.. ..|.. I-p I I
I
.-.I-I.I--s-F1-_ -I. ._ ... .I.---.--..|-.-II 1' II- -:- -- . g.-_ .- 4.. .... I-.... .. .|.I ,,,,,_ I_ _ _ -, _ _ I. _ l _ ; _ _ I_ _ _ II _ _ I _ II I
' I - ' . . v I . . I I I ' IF" -
I ll ' " ' ' II I' I' I -1--I1-I-|- -.
. I I I I . . . I E I IIII_ II_ I| III _ IIIIII-I:IIII_ _ -IIIIIIII;-_ II-II_ IIIIIIIIIIII-IIIIII
I I I * I - -
-.4... |I..... - ; ~ 3 .1.1 .._ -----.. II::II. I.-..-_ .1._ ._ -.;I. ._ _ _ ..I,_
I ' I I _ I I
I I I
I
' - II _ - .. .
-.-_ . . I. # 1.... ..:. ..._ ,_ , II _ _ _ _ _ I_ _ :II_ _ II_ _ _ _ : _ I
.| -.._ _ , _ _ I II
I :I -- . .
' -* --~ -* I~ - ' - -I------ -. .. . = _ ,._ _ _ _ ._ _ _ _ _ _ _
I I I I _ T -' I I - - P .
. i I I - I I ' II ' ' I -. - I
I "'
|' "~ ' _
K
II- |-
J
ii
F svvsc FR 10600 '
- swsc to IU III-U 1 "
_ "F oats TD_ TU TIU D'
F EIt' .' .l:
f-]' IIr-it|' J_ ...' _ ...II_ _ ,IIII.II_ . C-C"PCJ J1
I
I
' I I ! -- .|
' I'
. I I
I
' II - I _
.- ,_ I. i. 1|-I I -
II
._ I IIII . = I I II I -I II_
... _
- ' ' -' I - -1 ..
" II I ' ' I -- ..|.I-
I.
" ' I--II ' .-..' .,.,I_
I.-. I. . ...-II I_ _ _ _ _ II I
,_ . ....|--- -
I I._ .
CF
,.f1""* 1
II.
--.-- -I
F- I
,_ -...._ _ ,.
_ -_ I' I _ ...' .._ ' ._ -j
- _ .:_ I-_ -._ ;.j....,.. -' _ ._ I... F -; ?7 .
+ 0-. -.-..., _ _ H I
-lI .III
I +
+ ' I _
. , I
I II I - I
- I_ I- - + ...-
.-..-_ _ _ . I
2.1-I$ II -|._ ' _
L. -
.. _ ,| II_
J -in-I
- -- .-1|-- I :.-I. , I 1
. I I. _ . .. _ _ ._ 1._ _ _ ..' ......_ .I_ _ _
~ +
I.
I
I I
- ...
T-I-.
+ l' .I-
_ r_ _
til I.-I
I-
_ I-_ _ I
' 1 r_ - -I-I-I
_ .I Ii- '
II..
. I. I" I _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ I_ IIIIIII
.. - I... _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ,_ _ _ _ _ _
I -~ -|.- .II. .. , , I I I_ _ I_ _ ,I,I
I;
T1
. ._ . ._ .. . _ . : ,.._ _ ._ .I_ .._ ._ II
l
I I
.
_ _ _ I_
I
" ' ' - I--I- I-. |-- ......
"..' * 1.-- _ .I-.. . _ . II_ _ _ _ _ _ I_ _ _ _ _ I_ _ II_ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ + _ ;i
II
I_ I
---. -"I I .. .--.... ...-. -
_ _ _ I;+ I . I -' -' "-H -- ----..-.- ..........,...I,_ _ "I
- I l. ....- _ .. _ _ _ _ I II_ _ _ I_ III II
I II . - - I .- .- --. ---. I.I.-I.-+ .-.I-I. -..-.._ I '
3 I_ ,I_ _ .
-IIt.' -- --_ .---- I .I' .| - I
I in r" * 1-"'
r
-1 4
.' -_ t
r i
-1 I-
. _ I.
' e- T - I I .. _ , _ . _ _ _ I III I
- - ....,.
.
..|- - ' I - I
- I.
I
_ _ -r
I _ _ l_ -
I
._ II_ . I. I =I II ---~ .. .... _ _ _ _ _
it . I I I_ I
I,.I..- _ ;.. 1-;_ _ _ 2; _ _ .:_ _ _ ._ I_ I
".. " I. . II_ I
' ' - H ~ -. - ......_ ._ IT --
II ' | ' -
I, I" ' II - I- - --- -._ -...... _ .,_
I I
I I -n...
-.|
Il"' .- I
I F I I
.I,?-..-II- I
-4
_ _ ' -|- i
I -I
- - ..I...
H II --113 I _ I I I .
' I- I-' .
I l.
:5I ' 1' .. -+ il' -|- l_ ' l It I_ _ _ 1_ - oi II I II ' |- . I III I
I4.-I-I~ In
_ -_ |_ _ - _
I.
I
-' _ | I _ ; -I _ _
' _ ;| . _
Y
:- II_ _ I_ _
i T_ _ H IT _ _ _ _
II I: -n.- - |--t-I-..In_ :I _ I: _ lI II fI. i
-1" -II" -' 4--r-I--| ' _ ,.I,_ _ _ I _ II'
-I ;I ' I
- I- ~ -5 -h . ._ ; L-" i-t - ' .4 .1- .._ _
1- 1
1' _
I I.
-1- I
I -nq. . I
I
I -...... ._ , _ ,_ I_ _ _ I_ I_ _ _ II_ _
I
-\I '
' 5 -I -
I - ------ I. --- -.. ..- _ ,...._ ,_
-1-
.-I...
.|I I-
--H """ -I-J--. I
- "' I""' .Ii""_ ;,, 1 _ - _ I
_ -- I . . _ _ _
- - II - -- - I--.I .--.--.. . -. ._ ._ _ ,, , _ _ _ _ _ ' II_ _ _ I . .._ .- ,_
_ . .-
-- - ~ ---I-- --- .._ ... _ .. .,_ ._ _ _ _ _ I.,,_ _ _
.1 ' - I - - - ..--..I.-.- _ I I I I """ 1----I-I-I-I.-.-I _ _ _ ,
' _ . " I I
_ ._ . _ _ Ii.., ' II II. I I I I .
Ir I ' I: '
.. l .._ . I......... ' ._ ....1_ . _ _ _ _ + I I_ II _ _ II_ II III_ I_ I_ I IIIII_ .
- I I II IIIIIII
Q- I
I"IIIIII Ill I ' - I .. _ _ _ , _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ III_ _ _ III_ I I
_ I_ _ _ :|'
-\
|
--1- I"
I
I --I.--- --II---.._ _ I _ -. _ .-.,..._ .I_ . _ II_ ,-.II._ _
I
i
""5 "" Fl - IKIIIQI _ -II. I, _ _ _ I_ I_ I
Subscripts
bit =
It, =
III =
I in =
L
nic=
tn_ f=
0:.-
or=
bottomhole
borehole
invasion
mud
mudcake
mud ltrate
oil
residual oil
References
1. Parsons, C.P.:Caliper Logging, Trons., AIME (1943 ) 15 1, 3 5 -47 .
2. H ilohte, D.W.:Caliper Logging Theory and Praiz tiee, Log/ Inoiyet
(Jan.-Feb. 1963 ) 3 -12.
3 . Boyeldieu, C., Coblentz , A., and Plissier-Combesoure, 1.:Forma-
tion Evaluation in Oil Base Mud Wells," paper BB presented at the
198 4 SPWLA Symposium, New Orleans, June 10-13 .
4. Prineipies of Drilling Finid Control, 12th edition, Petroleum Exten-
sion Servioe, U . of Texas, Austin (198 1).
5 . RP i3 B, Standard Procedurefor Testing Driiiing Finids, fth edition,
API. Dallas (197 4).
C
lic
k
t
o
b
u
y
N
O
W
! P
D
F
-
X
C
hange V
ie
w
e
r
w
w
w
. d
o
cu-trac
k
.
c
o
m
C
lic
k
t
o
b
u
y
N
O
W
! P
D
F
-
X
C
hange V
ie
w
e
r
w
w
w
. d
o
cu-trac
k
.
c
o
m
I
I
I
i
MEASUREMENT ENVIRONMENT
14 --
I .'I
:5 -l l
COMPANY... ..T.II .... eLl .F0{1N,l I% I_0* -IPi 1NYI_I__ I Rm O,]It_:@ I
Ii i . U H i ' R f -.I_..-4Q._-@
vIIEtt___._...-_.-.BIm'3II< * I" I'~ -N. L-III. ?I'.I.'? -..,_____ 22 .IL='5 f@ ,. i I
I . BHT
neu_> ........_._......i i .FSI.0IJ.i :2LI!I_'.-i .IEI_-.--.....-_...._. - KB
D I: LI .- I
ot -
. COUN'l Y.__...... Li _N.I;:_0_I?.'_N _____,STATE_____I1I_;_I__" | PPI
I
._._.I-.. ' ,
PI-* 4
i n--i
.'I.'l I__.
I-I-n-In -I +-., .
I-Z--I-Ie I.I. . I
-1--| -In-1-J-Ii I I-I . ,
I...-_-...--.1. i ,...,.,_. I,I,._ _ ___ _ I I
._ _ I I_
Appar ent RII't.__Ii -Il _Qn1" I~ Im
D EII1_,,_.._..II..[ ;I'..0.II.I., _ft.
i .l 'II_..'L ':'.'1I" .'I I... I
1-
-
I
II-I-1.-| --| I-II-i -.Iq -I...-._-. +I.- ,- I, ., I II I I II
| | -----I. _. ... I. ,_ I_I
- .1. ___I,__,__
- I I .
M-| | -ti -| 1| i .| _.| | ,| -| ,| _ i
IEIE
I | -| | | -
..._, ..
-n-| i I-I-In
l ' i
1" ! -I--I
I
I-J- J-
_p-.1- | _
I.- 1;: ._-
W I ---...I.- _.I. _.
:1| .II-
I _I" ' I I' -
" " " " " -''~ r * -'-I| ---* -- I ... I 'I_'
I - - . I II I
I
I .I --
__ .I_I
II
_..I -.
I I-
71?1'j.."
.,_" " . ;1:.:;" " I..- ..
I .
- - 1-" : ---.... | ._
H :;.; - _. , __-_
I --
I _ L
_ " I* * i 1,;:;;-
__|
--4
-1--1
__| .
l .'I=--
_ ,___,_I
I _
-L :Ll | Hl _ L __;__ ]._;;\r --I'---- ---.I.-...
-\I\' I_I -_-_-_
_I
I,I 1--i i
--| ---
J. .I-If-.-F] ..
I-I
..
.--...-" ..-_.....--
__I.___ ____.
f-1| Ii
If.
-I-I -;i _ .-: _ ]t...-......_,..._ _ - ..
' :--I-r - - .--;-_:;__. _..I..._..,, I_I,_,_, L,_ ___
I
- -...n _
_\- I.I_ I. I__. L. ., Q .-...,| ,__
I'I.
-=,.- - _,-I -- - .._.
II
I:_;;'..'.
..::-_.-_I -;_--_-_,-___H ,I __-_-
+-- I1 I I.I.._... -I.
I_
... | _
...._._,,,. __
- - ._... I
.-i ,--
v.I I .
=. -I._=..;._ __......
I-.I_.-_.-._...
1--I-I-I.-_-_- -.__. __.. _
.I._._ - ._____. . ,,__
~ I' IT-1:'_I-I-I -:1-_ .-L ._ .
L._-.
I----- l 'Il ... .
I .'.:I...'.'
Ii i
i i
-.- ...... ,I.. ..
" .._J._._ 5 .--
--I----J-I----| -I __- I
-.-.-...I._.__......__,, L... ___-. __ ,
I . -. .|
| _
-II----I
..,...,.
1 _ __-: II _ II
I - I -.-.... -I
. . II
___..I._s_ _'
"
I
_._-..I,I_-._.
I:,_
_I
_
':r
I-I\I,
._I
I
I-L
i I. .
i _I
;._ .- ;_ Ii -. .... _ .
--...,
I _" I
I.=---_ - I...._ ..._..__,,
1| -I-I.I,,.
I
. IT 1* -
_ .._._._ -,,_ - _
I; r " _" IT-'1- :* I- ------ _.. ..._... _.
4-_' '1 T-" I-Ir ? ; - J-I . --~ .
I I
'-l Zl __'|
-:.-1 _-_ .| ,..,._
---~ ----I--4,,
-1-I-I-I-01+
...-..I:
i _;'f" ;'_..-.'...fT" 'Tl 'i ;.- . . .
___,.....I:__. I I
1----~ -- - _==- . - ---I. .L_..__.
-Ii -T
_ __ _____I
.._._, II .
.. -.... L, . , ,
* -H----I-.| ~ .
-..... ...
.-..._ II__
I... ._1._._
'I _II.._..,| , i _ I
..II.I.._ I. __
I I L
:_ F
" ' --e-. -.-___. ._.._._
I
1--T
| ..;;
I-.-...._'I.,_,__
'-I-I-_- -i -
I-- _. -__-_
_;r
r ji --Ir wr w-I-I--I.-.--I I ...,..- ___!
_ ' i n I" ' 5 - --H-:_'_4-I_:-- J"
- -I-I----H I--l |
._.._.._._._..__.i _._ ____ __,_I____ _ _ I
1 " -i
I-ni l -I
* -* _- 1-" r ---
Fi g. 4.4BMud l og of Pr obl em4.3.
-I- p.;__I- _.._
sunvev wan some cottar sso
009 0!
G U20
0030
D
D
0000
0066
009 6
I-CI
J
r '\
| . |
~ I
--| - -I-I-- --.- I.-..- .' ,
----2--.--L.---_ J,....,.,.,. ,__ _ __IIII______ ___ :___ __I__I___II_____I___?_III_ II
I - " " " I :.1_-.1n.
---'1 - -. __...,
" i '-" 'F'-i " " " " '$ I .
I' I " '
II I
--I.-.I__I.,.__.. I, ,
I. .
._ ...I| . ._.., ,I,__,__I, ___
I I _,E.- " II I 5
I ~ '=.' ' ' I - - . ...I .
_-- ---If" '- I | - - - '1n I '.I+--I---J-I---II-+' ---I --~ -- -I----- ---- L-hi -| | -1 ._._,,_,,_ ___ I_____ I_II_-III______III ___ I
.- I " I" I I I I I
4- -I I I
' " '1' I- I- ---.-._...-._... .
_-.~ - .T II T" " * 1 " " I=-" I- _
Tn I I I | | I, . | | I_ III I . I
" 'II;_I':'I . I I I
I b - I I II III --- ' -- -I ---I_' -Q I - H II .-. I" '_" " 'I'_" " " " :* =-t '2: -.--I _ --__ - _ _
' II '' ' I ' I ' I I I I- .. I'
I I
I 0
I-
I _ ... I_ .-
" I" ':" " 'l '1| --III----I--i i I-.. .- ....HII,,,._.,i ..I _i . ,..H..I... ..I',__T:J.) -- _-;.,,.___.I,,___ _.I. . .I____ I I__? _ _ IIIII I_;'-III I:_
I I I I 4" I I_ I
I F I I I III I -I _ -I II I....._
I ' I I I II I -II -.-. -" -" r : _I_
I i - ' - - :- __ ,. , ,. _, .
I I I I " I -_; __--w I--I I'. I1 II--- . _. I.I______I:-_,___ ___II__ _I__III_I_I ___
I I I
I | ._
'i i ' :_-':I-III--" -_--- ._._ ___I
' ,I I_ I I I -r | II
. . '1-l l I i I I I -. ._| ,. ___I_ I I __I I_I_I_ _II__ I I
" " " " " " " 'T1' ~ --Ir --- -I-----In-.-14' " II-Inn-g- -.- . ._ -- -l -- --- I-.... .- -I-I -----. I--~ __ I- .j, -; __:__.;. ___ _I__ I I
I , . - I _ . I _ I I I _- I-~ .
I III ' " ' ' II I'I'I -1--IJ-| -| - -.
. I I I I . . . It I IIIII_ I._I| I H _ III.-:'J" _-III_.IhI_-'_III-.IIII-I-I-III
I I I * I - -
* " l I---+- - I " I-I-= .-I----HF5 I~ ...._.s---" I" ----1+-
I I 1- ;.I, - I, I_ II ,,_ _ I I _ II HII I _I III
I I I '" - - - =T "
I
' - I _ - .. .
--_ . . I. #1.... ..:. ..._,_, II __ __ _____:_I_ _ II____: I
II -.._ _, ___ II
I :I -- . .
'-* --~ -* I~ -'- ------- -. .. . I _...___.____ _ _ _
I I I I _ T -' I I - - P .
I I ,I I - I I ' II ' ' 5 - -. - I
I
I " '
I. 2, ,
K
I\-| -
J
i i i
_F swscr aI0600
:F swscto We-U1"
- " F oats TD _TUT* UD '
F EIt'.'.l :
f-]'IIr -:1| 'J_.._...,I__,II,l _. C-C" PCJ J1
I I
I ' 'I I !-- .I
'I'
. I I
I .
' II - I _
.- ___ 1| -I I -
| I
I. I IIII I = I I II I -II,_
... _
I_L-L. I I I I II I; -' I . ., , _
II ' ' I -- .... I-
" ' I--II '.-..'.,.,I_
" --I I----'| - . .._.
I ',_. ....I-'- -
CF
,.f1" " * 1
II.
--.-- -I
F-I
,_-..L.__,.
_ -_I'I _ ...'.._'.--j
-_ .:;.I-- ,._;.j...,..-'_._I..n F -. ?7I
+0-. -.-..., __HI
-l I .III
In +
+' I _
. , ,
I II | - ,
- 9 - - + ._.-
.-I.-___. I
2.1-I$ II -| ._'_
L. -
1. _,| IIIIII
J-.-. '| l -I-|
-- - .-1| -- I :.-| . , 1' 1
' , 1 I, II - I-- -__. II,.___-....--.-_-I_ .__- . _ _.:I.- II_
T-r -.
. :- II-
_r __
ti j
" I
_ | -l . I}-._
'1 r _ - :1"
i - .__
I
., -II',,,,,_I,'1__ I..-.-I-Ia: I__ I :
I
" " - - --- --- _-_. ,,__,,-
- i "
II _. ._ ._ -_ ,__,._II ___,I___ I
I
I " " '* --\I+I-.I._,__,, " III
' . I
I;
T1
. ._ . ._.. . _. : ...__._.I_,,_._ II
l
_ I
.
___I_
I
---r I- I-- .-....
_+_;i
I
,_ |
---. -" I - I .. ._-.... ._.-. -
__ _I;+ I . I -'-'" -H -- ----..-.- .........,...,,,_ _ " I
I II1--I .- .- -.-. ---. | .I.-| .-+.-II-I. I..-.._ I '
3 I:-__ .
-IIt.'-- --_.---- T .I' .| - I
I i n I- * 1-" '
r
-1 4
.'-_t
r i
-1 I-
..I- - ' I - I
- I.
_ I - .
' I ~ 1+ ' | 11 I -- ...,.. _ _ __ ,
I
_ _-r
I __ I_-
I
1- -' r . I
r 111 ' -I 1' :--_ Z; -_-:_-_-_ __ _
. , - -- . I. I,
I I --I " ' .~ _I' II I .. .
Hr I |
- I-- --- -a......._.,
.j_,..._I-' I I I -I
I I - - . ,.I.,.
i i I'M " I
' -- I-'.
;__ .
I___
.I
.1 _|
i
'_-.___. _,'
-I I
f-II 1-. ._ .- F
1'_
I I.
-1- I
I -nq . . I
I-
I -...... ._, _,_i ___I_ I____I_l
I
___1-
'-
-\I '
'5 -I -
I - ------ +~ --- -.. ..- _,...._
-1-
.-,...
.| III-
--H " " " -I-J--. I
I__IIII_I_I I. .
'1' " - '
__
\I
' I
A g__-_II
i i.-,.,., _
_.I.; ..--....
I = i
I
. _, __.
- II - -- - --- --.--... -. ._ .__,, , __ _, '
- I__ I I . -.-...
-- -.,- '* " " . - ~ ---+-- --- ..._... -.. . -__ ____I.,,___
.1 ' " ' ' - I - -- ..--..L...- _ I I I I " " " 1----I-I-I-I.-.-I ___,
I
I -..II- -I II I I I
_-_. __~ i .., I, ,,,, . I I I -
, I ' I! I I -.- _. l .._. I......... ' ,_.,..I_. _ _,_____+I_____II_____I_I___I'_I___ I _II___ _I_I
I I . ~ . I. . .. .
Q- I
I_IIIL II I ' j " '--P --- .... I
_I___ :| '
-\
|
--1-I"
I
I --i -~ --- --I---I-._ _, __. _.-.,..._.,_, _II_,-.II.__.
I
I
" " 5 " " Fl - IKIIIQI _-| ,.IH I, ___I_I_ I
Subscr i pts
bi t =
,1, =
g =
I -In =
L
ni c=
nt_f=
0:-
or =
bettomhol e
bor ehol e
i nvasi on
mud
mudcake
mud l tr ate
oi l
r esi dual oi l
Refer ences
1. PaIr soIns, C.P.: Cal i per Loggi ng, Tr ons., AIME (19 43) 15 1, 35 -47.
2. Htl ohte, D .W.: Cal i per Loggi ngTheor y and Pr atzti ee, Log/ Inni yet
(Jan.-Feb. 19 63) 3-12.
3. Boyel di eu, C., Cobl entz, A., and Pl i ssi er -Combescur e, 1.: For ma-
ti onEval uati on i nOi l Base Mud Wel l s," paper BB pr esented at the
19 84 SPWLA Symposi um, New Or l eans, June 10-13.
4. Pr i nei pi es of D r i i i i ng Fi ni d Contr ol , 12th edi ti on, Petr ol eumExten-
si onSer vi ee, U. of Texas, Austi n (19 81) .
5 . RP i 3B, Standar d Pr ocedur efor Testi ng D r i i i i ng Fi ni ds, fth edi ti on,
API. D al l as (19 74) .
90
TH EORY, MEASU REMENT, AND INTERPRETATION OF WELL LOGS
Sllllllllllll RWELL llllllllll llllllllllllllllll
, . - T fr H E/ c
WEL .%
-. LEE 03 2 1 .
1.1
J.
F|Eto_ _ c0H sTANcE ..a;ex.ou_ --_ '
LOCATION 5 EG_ ._ _ 23 - L65 -3 1! ; .
Elovotiorn D.F.:_ _
cgupffy CH ER FEED or CDMPFLNY
_ ,,-, COU NW - .._ ..... _ _ _ . or G.l..:_
l ' -J sr;m_ --,_ LU ,l5 _ 1ANA_ ---. FILING No._ _ ._ _ ..
sun H o. veg E;
T ' "' 1' ; ..
_ I 5 3 ,1 T
-.-L.-.. _ .._ ...
i-. _ ,_ _ ._
ANY ! |EEB|Q Q Lorz ohon oi Well
Sehlum '
ia--i
i._ _ ._ _ _ _ _
ii "-' -I ii. + "j;
in --.-|-
"|' -~ .-
-Ilia.._ .
WH PAH I ' 5 -WL Q: seer s tr. 996 tr
-
_ _ E_
_ @ F
_ "F
QR
Mos. jg r_ np_ _
Bit Si: _
it it
H _ .._
ea
is
I-. i
A" - _ _
so f
er
=3
ll
6-YE
I
l(.B.:_ ._ _ _ ... .
l I-
ll
I"DI-III-I
RU N No
Rdochird
_ I
\
sstliea. . 15 5 .! ..._ ll1I_ [ l IEH BB l2_ IB5 _ . I3 40
coding" " T
Feet Mm ' -1_ t_ r5 l_ _ _ _ _ T1" ' '
l==-E.
.. _ q5 n|-2 |n1|| R93 3 |213
Mum LL10 -
.-.._ Z 023 _ L.; 21123 - 21128 : l1' 1B...._ ._ .....J2B
D' ....- -_ i
_ .J_
"ll" T H 12]. _
-=11 I1] for
._ _ _ _ _ .5 . F _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Csg. Schlom. l |3 5 Q.[ ' I"3 6| " ' _ " ' ""f"_ -""'
C_ s_ g, D ' _ _ |_ Ior _ j_ |3 5 |] - [ 3 ' i ' "
_ _ pth lileo' c|1_ _ _ H m "
r
II
_ _ _ I any H ah B F i" "_ '
In _ .. _ _ _ - _ .._ _ _ ._ ._ _ _ _
-1--0--11
oil .5 5
_ l"li # 5 1:
oi;
-Fr.
rt
...PH _ .
Iii as
.
Siz e
we. net ~ ":_ T;;3 g_ ,! ,@": ,,,;,_ ,trt,,,-,,_ -,
i AM_
* ' "' ":_ T _ ' LlP-_ .f_ i - mg ii . tr,
5 Z s* _ .1
no_ _ --
1:; _ I ls... T;
T~ ~ - c 1 -;1 - "2-_ i;-...
E
- . h ' . _ . _ _ _ _ _ --: _ -.-_ ... .,._ ,.,.' - I E-.r .1
\-"\Io--lI --
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ ;_ _ _ _ _ -_ _
_ .._ ,
1|-
--_ .._ _ -_ -_ _ -_ -_ _ _ 1| -_ -
I A T Fig. 4.49 l.og heading of Problem 4.4. 1
_ "l=_ F |
G ti BF I
1- _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -_ -- - -_ -- ' _ _ --- -=- ' 5 _ ; -- . .
3 l-_ _ ._ ._ -- .... _ _ i-- - - ! - , .- 2, X- - -- -=r-=-=l-L
i ' I I " K |
I |
_ : . - _ _ _ : . _ I
I I fl l l|_ ' ._ ._ _ . Tr- --:-:- - . : ; ._ ._ _ _ -- - --
B . _ .._ . _ . _ --_ .. _ _ _ -- _ - _ _ L.
i I ' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ --_ _ ' T ' > <
| X I ._ - _ . I:
9 _ _ .. K. ......_ i_ _ _ ._ _ _ l.
FEET ii-
DEPTH 1000
-E E
-1-._ ' _ ' -H Y* 1* 1;-* _ t , -_
.. E ..:.3 5
-IrII. . .. 1.{' i' _ _ - -L- Xi"
. _ _ _ _ .... ,_ ._ _ .. .. \
' ' _ _
"I
> < -};t;=.:..- 1-:T *
" - _ ' ~ ' - > < |
. _ . J, I
. _ _ r_ - _ . ... - rs.-.1. -1 I I I . . - - * * 7 ' 7 ' -Phi "' 4 I
' 1| |
= ' . .. 15 ._ ._ ._ _ _ ._ _ _ .-_ _ _ _ i. ._ _ -----2-_ . ._ _ _
g ....... - . 5
I l .> < . =
| {* 1
_ _ ._ _ .! _ ; . .. . 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
21 ;' _ .;' ;;i' i. _ H l - 9
| :- - ----- --, NC
T=arJ-E> tPlo l]EE-lMl[ lEPTH ilElCIlI|ll I i; X
2 re ca" l t ii.-T-ll-lllilld-illU ? t 5 .1 t ..."
TEl' lPEFlFlTU FiE F
l > -r . l - l
Fig. 4.5 0 Composite plot of mud temperatures recorded In
wells drilled along the Tuacaloose trend, LA (from Ref. 3 2).
. _ ' - :_ :' .-.-; _ -- _ _ _ :; ----- _ _ _ _ _ -_ -. ; _ --- - - l-
H orner, V. et ai.:Ivlicrobit Dynamic Filtration Studies, Trans.,
AIME (195 7 ) 210, 18 3 -95 .
Lowe, T.A. and Dunlap, H .F.:Estimation of Mud Filtrate Resistivi-
ty in Fresh Water Drilling Muds," Log Analyst, (March April 198 6)
7 7 -8 4.
Overton, H .L. and Lipson, L.B.:A Correlation of the Electrical Prop-
erties of Drilling Fluids with Solids Content," Trans., AIME H 95 8 )
213 , 3 3 3 -3 6.
Log Interpretation Charts, Schlumberger, H ouston (I97 2).
Wang, G.C., H elander, D.P., Wieland, D.R.:Laboratory Resistivity
Evaluation of Lime, GYP, and Calcium Lignite Calcium Lignosul-
fonate Muds," Trans, SPWLA, Third Symposium (196i).
Lynn, R.D.:Effect of Temperature on Drilling Mud Resistivities,
paper SPE 13 026 presented at the 195 9 SPE Annual Meeting, Dallas,
Oct. 4 i.
Log interpretation, Vol. 1:Principles, Schlumberger, H ouston (I922).
Ferguson, C.K. and Klotz , J.A.:Filtration from Mud During Drill-
ing, Trans., AIME (195 4) 201, 29-42.
Williams, I-I. and Dunlap, H .F.:Short Tenn Variations in Drilling
Fluid Parameters; Their Measurement and Implications, Log Analyst
(Sept. 0ct. I98 4) 3 -9.
Johnson, I-I.lvI.:The Borehole Environment:Known and U nknown,"
paper T05 1, Canadian Well Logging Soc., I920.
Basic Concepts of Well Log Interpretation, Welex, H ouston (1923 ).
Phelps, G.D., Stewart, G., and Peden, J.M.:Analysis of the Invad-
ed Z one Characteristics and Their Influence on Wireline Log and Well-
Test Interpretation, paper SPE 13 23 ? presented at the I93 9 SPE An-
nual Technical Conference and Exhibition, H ouston, Oct. 16-19.
Gondouin, M. and H elm, A.:Experimentally Determined Resistivi-
ty Profiles in Invaded Water and Oil Sands for Linear Flows, JPT
(March 1964) 3 3 ' ?-43 ; Trans., AIME, 23 1.
Pirson, S..T.:H andbook of Well Log Analysis, Prentice-H all Inc., En-
glewood Cliffs, NI (1963 ) 5 9.
Guyed, H .:Temperature Well Logging:H eat Conduction, Oil Weekly
(Oct. 21, 1946).
C
lic
k
t
o
b
u
y
N
O
W
! P
D
F
-
X
C
hange V
ie
w
e
r
w
w
w
. d
o
cu-trac
k
.
c
o
m
C
lic
k
t
o
b
u
y
N
O
W
! P
D
F
-
X
C
hange V
ie
w
e
r
w
w
w
. d
o
cu-trac
k
.
c
o
m
THEORY, MEASUREMENT, AND INTERPRETATION OF WET
Sl l l l l l l l l l l l RWELL l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
, 3 . T or fr we/ =
WEL ._
-. LEE 032 1 .
1.1
J.
F| Eto__c0HsTANcE ..a;ex.ou_--_ '
LOCATION 5 EG _.__23- L65 -31!; .
El ovoti or n D .F.:__
cgupffy CHER FEED or CD MPFLNY
_,,-, COUNW - .._._... ___. or G .l ..:_
l ' -J sr ;m___,_LU,l 5 _1ANA___-. FILING No._.__
sunHo. veg E;
'" ' 1'; ..
_. I5 21 :2,
-.-L.-.-
ANY !| EEB| Q Q Loeohon oi Wel l
Sehl um i ___ _
'--" ' -\l -Ii ---i .i ...._
- - l _~ ______,
.-
--.-F
-Il -i .._. .._.
3 C i l atl l .5 -\I!L-Q1 m i s ts. 9 5 5 -..
-
F
_
QR
Mos. jgr _np_._
Bi t Si : _
i t i t
H _.._
TF
as
as
I-. i
l (.B.:_,__ _,.. .
=3
l l
no
I
ID I-III-Il l
RUN o
Rdochi r d
_ I
\
sstl i ea. . 15 5 .! ..._ l l 1I_[ l IEHBB l 2_IB5 _. I340
codi ng" " T
_J_
E
Foot Moo u _o_el _]____ _" ' _ V ' '
PP
.. _q 5 g| -2 | n1| | R9 33 | 213
Mum LL10 -
.-.._ Z023 _i _; 21123 . 21128 : l ZB...._._.__..J2B
D '....- -_ i " l l " T H12]. _
-=11 I1] for
_t t C. - _
C:g.5 ch| um. t | 35 g.| ';" 35 | " r - -c " " " '"
C_ _g,D '__l _Ior _ _ | 35 ;m. [ 3 =
__ pth l teo'i :l 1__ L _ _ G m} "
l
II
__ _ I any H ah B F i " " _'
In __. ___ - _.._ __ ._ .____
-1--0--41
oi l ..5
_l " l i #5 1:
oi ;
-F..
r t ...;-H __ _ '
Ii i ar e
l
J'!_II= as
-I1
Si ze
-1; ' _--- _ - OF
'" !- l s" _.C 3l 1_oi a. assess
i AM-
M=v=._T mP- 5 .f_; - | i __2 i t : _ tr U
5 Zs* _,1
- l s- ~ -
| :
_ l _.
Lg.
-4__| ..
__., | . .i
5 %
Tl mo
- . h '. _ . _ _ ___ --:_-.-_ ... ...,._,.,.' - I E-.r .1
\-" \Io--l I--
? I :-__
'l - I -
_AEl l __
so -La'e';_ " ff 71;-J
--__.__ -_-__-_-__ _ 1| -_ -
I A l l Fi g. 4.49 l .og headi ng of Pr obl em4.4. 1
OG S
1- _ - - ___ ____ -_ -- --_-- ' _ __-- -=- '5 _; -- . .
3 l -__._._ -- .... __ i -- --- ! - , .- 2,, X-- ---=H-=-=l -L
i ' I I " K |
I |
_ : . - _ __ : . _ I
I I fl l l | _ ' ._.__. Tr ---: -:- - . : ; ..._ __ -----
B . _.._. _, __.__ .. ___ -- _ - _ _ L.
i I ' _ _ ___ _._'..-__' l g '> <
| X I ._ - _ . I:
9 _ __- K. ......_i _ __.___l .
FEET i i-
D EPTH1000
-E E
-1-._'_ ' -H 1* 1* 1;-* _t at -_
.. E ..:.35
-Ir II. . .. 1.{'i ' __- -1.- Xi "
. ____.... ,_ ._ _ .. .. \
' ' _ _
" I
> < -};t,=.:..- 1-: T *
_ _ U} _ _ _ .
. _ _r _ - _. ... - '~ s .-.1. -1 I I I - _ - - * * 7 '7' -Phi " '4 I
' 1| |
' . .. 15 ._._._.____._-_ __ _ i . ._ _ -----I-_ . __-_
, ....... 71 . 5
I l .> < . =
| {* 1
__.__.!_; . .. . 1 ____ __..
21 ;'_.;';;i 'i . _ H l - 9
| :- - ----- --, NC
T=ar J-E> tPl o l ]EE-l Ml [ l EPTHi l El CIl I| l l I i ; X
2 r e ca" c. t stati sti ci anUs t 5 .1 t .2
TEHPERHTURE F
l > < . l - l
Fi g. 4.5 0Composi te pl ot of mud temper atur es r ecor ded In
wel l s dr i l l ed al ong the Tuacal oose tr end, LA (fr omRef. 32) .
._'- :_:' __-; _ -- ___:;----- _____-_-.;_--- - - l -
Hor ner , V. et ai .: Ivl i cr obi t D ynami c Fi l tr ati onStudi es, Tr ans.,
AIME (19 5 7) 210, 183-9 5 .
Lowe, T.A. and D unl ap, H.F.:Esti mati onof Mud Fi l tr ate Resi sti vi -
ty i nFr esh Water D r i l l i ng Muds," Log Anal yst, (Mar chApr i l 19 86)
77-84.
Over ton, H.L. and Li pson, L.B.: A Cor r el ati onof the El ectr i cal Pr op-
er ti es of D r i l l i ng Fl ui ds wi th Sol i ds Content," Tr ans., AIME H9 5 8)
213, 333-36.
Log Inter pr etati on Char ts, Schl umber ger , Houston (I9 72) .
Wang, G .C., Hel ander , D .P., Wi el and, D .R.:Labor atoty Resi sti vi ty
Eval uati onof Li me, G YP, and Cal ci umLi gni teCal ci umLi gnosul -
fonate Muds," Tr ans, SPWLA, Thi r d Symposi um(19 63) .
Lynn, R.D .: Effect of Temper atur e onD r i l l i ng Mud Resi sti vi ti es,
paper SPE 13026 pr esented at the 19 5 9 SPE Annual Meeti ng, D al l as,
Oct. 4i .
Log i nter pr etati on, Vol . 1:Pr i nci pl es, Schl ur nber ger , Houston(l 9 '}'2) .
Fer guson, C.K. and Kl otz, J .A.: Fi l tr ati onfr omMud D ur i ng D r i l l -
i ng, Tr ans., AIME (19 5 4) 201, 29 -42.
Wi l l i ams, I-I. and D unl ap, H.F.: Shor t Ter mVar i ati ons i nD r i l l i ng
Fl ui d Par ameter s; Thei r Measur ement and Impl i cati ons, Log Anal yst
(Sept.0ct. I9 84) 3-9 .
Johnson, I-I.l vI.: The Bor ehol e Envi r onment:Knownand Unknown,"
paper T05 1, Canadi anWel l Loggi ng Soc., I9 30.
Basi c Concepts of Wel l Log Inter pr etati on, Wel ex, Houston (19 33) .
Phel ps, G .D ., Stewar t, G ., and Peden, J.M.: Anal ysi s of the Invad-
ed Zone Char acter i sti cs and Thei r Infl uence onWi r el i ne Log and Wel l -
Test Inter pr etati on, paper SPE 1323? pr esented at the I9 39 SPE An-
nual Techni cal Confer ence and Exhi bi ti on, Houston, Oct. 16-19 .
G ondoui n, M. and Hel m, A.: Exper i mental l y D eter mi ned Resi sti vi -
ty Pr ofi l es i nInvaded Water and Oi l Sands for Li near Fl ows, JPT
(Mar ch 19 64) 33'?-43; Tr ans., AIME, 231.
Pi r son, S..T.: Handbook of Wel l Log Anal ysi s, Pr enti ce-Hal l Inc., En-
gl ewood Cl i ffs, NI (19 63) 5 9 .
G uyed, H.: Temper atur e Wel l Loggi ng:Heat Conducti on, Oi l Weekl y
(Oct. 21, 19 46) .
1* -_ _ _
MEASU REMENT ENVIRONMENT
e
-' . .i,_ Twp. 9.l:l _ _ _ Rge, ..?_ 91' i _
Permanent Dotum=, Elev_ _ _ i1]_ Z _ _ Elem, ill-i
Log Measured Froi-n_ _ I$.r_ ............l.?_ Ft. Above Perm. Dotum - -
Drilling Measured From I' ll - B - _ _ E222
._ nc cuttun
no CU LEH H
00.t5nsnrsioi;
coMPANY....;G.1! ! iIlH E"TAl- "IL rsnr
wE|,|_ _ ,_ _ _ ;_ _ l-10 EU LLU H I.tH |T_ I_ .ft_ ._ _ 7 5
" |=||5 |_ p _ H U RTH H C CU L_ _ l,1l_ H _ _
(' _ jQ|_ 1[ ~ ,|1' Y JACKSU H FELD or toaston "BETH WELL
_ U TTIT
COMPANY CONT L I- 2 H
COU NTY JACttsg_ t1l_ _ _ _ _ _ :_ _ _ :_ _ _ _ _ 3 1-A-|-E COL0tta00
OCATIOH 65 0' F5 L 205 0' Ft-it. Cttherervicesi
F00-CH L-GR
not
PP?E-res"
.,_ .e.a|.. 1 Q; it 1
Psathrleser 5 _ &5 _ L_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ._ . _ _
Bl ls In -=l.IiB_ 5 _ 0 _
m. _
Tenloo interval I 3 _ ]_ D _ _ g _ _ _ _ _ _ ,_ _ _ _ _ _ i _ _ _ _ T _
< 3 -==iii' _ i0rtIl=r i_ _ 9_ -_ _ 5 ,lH _ @3 J_ 2_ e _ _ - e e
Coiin--Lo ef' ' i 1
Bit 5 iz g_ _ _ _ _ -j_ Ll.| | _ _ _ _ _ _
WP Flviduliililale FIil11_ _ _ _ _ _ _ I
I ' " :
E _ l_ _ E_ ui _ Lest" _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
ource"o' F5 E' mle ' ' 5 _ U ' '
e . . ' i ' "' _ ' "T"-
" Ft l"I' fL~ , A ..., A ... E.
R 0" il|' ie0|I-..Tern, F1
F
,, Meoi.Tern, - _ _ _ _ _ _ AF .
R-it -.@.-' tl! E - Tt' vr- "F. E
-
ee-
-iii-ii
loo : In O ."_ ' ! ..?:1._ rose @lit
sse.a.a,,, _ r_ i,,,,,,_ _ _ _ _ _ '
...12.;
,: e-' -to
UG
EII T-B I1 e-la E... =1. o-ta o 0' 11 -@' -iii}
,, - B-H T _ F
Time Since Ciro. '
o e. Tem
_ R_ ecordek:l lif I
* 99 P- _ _ ,_ _ _ _ _ . .
Egui}:5 _ |_ _ Locotion _ _ _ _ ' "_ ' '
.. _ _ _ ..._ _ _ -l..1i_ T.-:lli.l.9_ 1' =T. . H J _ -_ . '
witnessed B ' " ' ~
G} ED I1-"I
E3 95 I-at-2i;u
i I". Q
_ |' I |-=2
1....
r-Fl
Qt:
U H
counts JKEEN FED o
gf H TH H 1: BU LL
WELL H ECU LLU H U H T gi.o=a|qf_ ' Cl1I' T lT|_ El\l_ T' All. U L
AB DR
CCtMPAN' f_ _ _ _ _ U H TIH EH IAILU IL EDH PAH |' _ _
WELL _ .-_ _ _ .H _ CU LLU H Ll_ H l_ T H lJ._ ' i5 _
nae -. Trieste ac t:ui.|_ ._ uM .1 _
5 7 > vip Rge _ _
- - _ Fl Above Perm Datum
9??
tog Measured Frorn
Drilling Measured From
Date _
a
II
i
11-
' iu_ e_ rto.
9 atl.' _ :! ' -ti"! ! ! ._ ,_ _ ti
_ _ l:.lfg|s_ th_ --t.t2tl_ ! |ger
Btrri, lag Interval
To I. lnt oi
_ . _ _ | _
P og ere
Casin ~ Dri|ler
.' f' 3 =t=i"0 l< =0eIrr
, -:
O1-,
E,:,U -_ :D 3
5
--.. .-.--_ -;-_ :-_ . -:_ _ -_ ._ _ _ _ -_ \ -- ----
. .._ _ l_ ' _ _ @ "tit _ T _
Bit_ 5 i:e
E
Type F|uicl_ i_ i1_ _ I' lo_ |e_
l-ii to1
:I" _ ! il=! i=lTr-I. - ._ _ l.--.----.
Dari I sc.
_ _ ,;;_ u_ J Fluid Loi
Boureeofumple
-3 '
Re-5 3
Rm @_ Meos. Temp.
Flmf @Moos. Ternp.
-
r"
re? 1
Lela DEW
_ ... u T _ -