Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
1
Infectious disease
Benensen AS, editor. Control of Communicable Diseases Manual. Sixteenth Edition, 1995. 2
Dynamics of disease transmission
HOST
Epidemiologic
Triad
VECTOR
AGENT ENVIRONMENT
Human disease results from interaction between the host, agent and
the environment. A vector may be involved in transmission.
Host susceptibility to the agent is determined by a variety of factors,
including genetic background, nutritional status, vaccination, prior
exposure, context
3
Factors associated with increased risk of
human disease
Host Characteristics Agent Environmental Factors
4
Modes of disease transmission
5
Direct mode of disease transmission
6
Indirect mode of disease transmission
Vehicle-borne
Transmission through contaminated inanimate objects (toys, food,
water, surgical utensils, or biological products such as blood, tissues
or organs)
Vector-borne
Transmission through simple contamination by animal or arthropod
vectors or their actual penetration of the skin or mucous membranes
Airborne
Transmission occurs when microbial, particulate, or chemical agents
are aerosolized and remain suspended in air for long periods of time
7
Incubation period
8
Outcomes of exposure to an agent
9
Endemic, epidemic, pandemic
Number
of Cases
of “Endemic”
Disease
“Epidemic”
Time 10
Deaths in Greater London;
December 1 – 15, 1952
800
600
400
200
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
December 11
Disease Outbreaks
Common Source
Cases are limited to those who share a common exposure
Food-borne, water
Propagated
Disease often passed from one individual to another
Measles, STDs
12
Essential Steps in an Outbreak
Investigation
13
Steps of an Outbreak Investigation
14
Step 1: Establish the existence of an
outbreak
Before you decide whether an outbreak exists, you must first
determine the expected or usual number of cases for the given
area and time
15
Step 1: Establish the existence of an
outbreak
Data sources
Health department surveillance records for a notifiable
disease
Sources such as hospital discharge records, mortality
records and cancer or birth defect registries
for other diseases and conditions
If local data is not available, make estimates using data
from neighboring states or national data
16
Step 1: Establish the existence of an
outbreak
Whether or not an outbreak is investigated or control measures are
implemented is not strictly tied to verifying that an epidemic exists…
Other factors may come into play, including:
Severity of the illness
Potential for spread
Political considerations
Public concern and pressure from community
Availability of resources
17
How do we know when we have an
excess over what is expected?
Public Health Surveillance
“The ongoing and systematic collection, analysis, and
interpretation of outcome-specific data for use in the
planning, implementation, and evaluation of public health
practice”.
19
Step 2: Verify the diagnosis
20
Step 3: Define and identify cases
21
Step 3: Define and identify cases
22
Step 3: Define and identify cases
The case definition is used to actively search for more cases beyond the early
cases and the ones that presented themselves.
24
Step 3: Define and identify cases
26
Step 4: Describe and orient the data in
terms of time
The time course of an epidemic is shown by the distribution of the
times of onset of the disease, called the Epidemic Curve
Graph of the number of cases of the health event by their date of
onset
Provides a simple visual display of the magnitude and time trend of
the outbreak
May stratify epidemic curves by place (residence, work, school, etc.)
or by personal traits (age, gender, race, etc.) to assess whether time
of onset varies in relation to place or person characteristics
27
Step 4: Describe and orient the data in
terms of place
Assessment of the outbreak by place provides
Information on the geographic extent of the problem
A “spot map” indicating place of occurrence of cases may
show clusters or patterns that provide clues to the nature
and source of the outbreak
Patterns reflecting water supply, wind currents, or
proximity to a restaurant, swimming pool, school room or
workplace
If the size of overall population varies between
comparison areas, a “spot map” of the area may be
misleading because it only shows number of cases
28
Step 4: Describe and orient the data in
terms of person
Examine risks in subgroups of the affected population
according to personal characteristics, as well as
interaction between characteristics
Age, race, sex, occupation, social group, medical status
Characterizing an outbreak by person helps to determine
which subgroups of the population are at risk
29
Examples of epidemic curves
30
Step 5: Develop hypotheses
31
Step 6: Evaluate hypotheses
32
Reminder....attack rate
33
Attack rate
34
Calculating an Attack Rate in a
food-borne outbreak
In a foodborne outbreak occurring among people attending a social
function or common geographical site
Calculate an attack rate for people who ate a particular item
(exposed) and an attack rate for those who did not eat the item
(unexposed)
The attack rate is calculated by dividing the number who
became ill and consumed the item by the total number
of people who consumed that item
35
Identifying the source of an outbreak
36
Step 7: Refine hypotheses and carry out
additional studies
Additional epidemiologic studies
What questions remain unanswered about the disease?
What kind of study used in a particular setting would answer these
questions?
When analytic studies do not confirm the hypotheses reconsider the
original hypotheses orlook for new vehicles or modes of
transmission
37
Step 7: Refine hypotheses and carry out
additional studies
Laboratory and environmental studies
Epidemiologic studies can implicate the source of infection,
and
guide appropriate public health action
But sometimes laboratory evidence can “clinch” the
findings
Environmental studies often help explain why an outbreak
occurred and may be very important in certain settings
38
Case control methods applied to a
food-borne outbreak
The usual approach is to apply the case-control
methodology to determine what exposures ill people had
that well people did not have
List all of the relevant items on the menu
Determine the proportions of ill and of non-ill persons who
ate each of the items by questionnaire
Identify the food item with the largest difference in attack
rates between cases (ill) and controls (non-ill)
39
Step 8: Implementing control and
prevention measures
The practical objectives of an epidemic investigation are to
stop the current epidemic and establish measures that would
prevent similar outbreaks in the future
Preliminary control measures should be implemented as soon
as possible
40
Ro = βcD
R o = Reproductive Rate
(number of secondary infections/infected case)
41
To sustain an epidemic
42
Therefore, elements of epidemic control
43
Step 9: Communicate findings
44
Diarrhea at a high school dinner
45 2006.
Pakalniskiene et al. A foodborne outbreak of enterotoxigenic E. coli and Salmonella Anatum infection after a high-school dinner in Denmark, November
Epidemiol Infect. 2008; 1-6
Diarrhea at a high school dinner
46 2006.
Pakalniskiene et al. A foodborne outbreak of enterotoxigenic E. coli and Salmonella Anatum infection after a high-school dinner in Denmark, November
Epidemiol Infect. 2008; 1-6
Diarrhea at a high school dinner
Eating more
portions of
pasta had a
dose response
effect on the
risk ratio; this
was not true of
the bread rolls
47 2006.
Pakalniskiene et al. A foodborne outbreak of enterotoxigenic E. coli and Salmonella Anatum infection after a high-school dinner in Denmark, November
Epidemiol Infect. 2008; 1-6
Diarrhea at a high school dinner
48 2006.
Pakalniskiene et al. A foodborne outbreak of enterotoxigenic E. coli and Salmonella Anatum infection after a high-school dinner in Denmark, November
Epidemiol Infect. 2008; 1-6