A cose 5toJy lo Otqoolzouoo lotetool neoltbcote ltovlJet now Can 8|g Data Support Learn|ng rocess? A Case Study |n Crgan|zanon Interna| nea|thcare rov|der usp|ta kencana Sar|, School of Lconomy and 8uslness, 1elkom unlverslLy, pusplLakencana[LelkomunlverslLy.ac.ld L|v|ra Az|s, School of Lconomy and 8uslness, 1elkom unlverslLy, vlra.azls[gmall.com usp|ta kencana Sar|, L|v|ra Az|s Abstract Nowdays Big Data analytics is used in many aspects of organisations. This paper discuss about how big data is used to improve learning process and support learning organization. This paper take case of Yakes Telkom as PT. Telkom internal healthcare provider that has 403 of staff separately in 950 clinics all-over Indonesia. Yakes Telkom has to service more less 150.000 people, including employees, pensions and their dependents. Yakes has online medical record system that integrate all medical data from all clinics. Having huge medical records from its patients, could be used to improve quality of care that they provide. By sharing and analyzing healthcare information, physicians can identify the best treatments for their patients and do service excellent. Comprehensive analytics can also give more correlated view of cost and quality of both in healthcare delivery and administrative process. Furthermore, it could be reduce healthcare expenditure of the organization itself. Keywords: 8ig Da|a, nca||ncarc prctidcr, |carning crganiza|icn Introducnon Data is one of important asset had by organization. Data is commonly used to help decision making process in any level of management. Data is also basic for creating knowledge. It then used by organization to improve and innovate process or product. Digitalization almost all data in organization make explotion number of data. Beside increasing the volume, technology development also enable organization to process and analyze variation of data, not only structured data but also unstructured data. Organization should also consider about its velocity and veracity to optimize that large amount of data, either from outside or inside organizitation. Now days, its called as Big Data. Data and information that have pattern can form knowledge. According to Delphi Cioup ieseaich in 2OOO, 42 knovIedge ieposiloiy in enpIoyees liain(Uiiaile }i, 2OO8). But now in the Big Data era and information technology development, organizations can have knowledge not only from their employees but also from their consumers, partners, and other sources outside them. 584 | ISCLO 2013 | The 1 st lnLernauonal Semlnar & Conference on Learnlng Crganlzauon roceedlngs Big Data could improve the way organizations do businesses even generate a new business. According to research by McAfee and Brynjolfsson from MIT, companies that inject big data and analytics into their operation show productivity rates and piohlaliIly lhal aie 5 lo 6 highei lhan lhose of lheii peeis (McAfee, 2O12)
. Big Data anaIylics couId le used in nany heId of lusiness, incIuding in heaIlhcaie seivices. ig Dala anaIylics can le used lo suppoil hve nain acliviles of Ieaining oiganizalion dehned by Garvin (1993) in Jashpara (2004); systematic problem solving, experimentation with new approaches, learning from their own experience and past history, learning from the experiences and best practices of others, and transferring knowledge quickly and efhcienlIy lhioughoul lhe oiganizalion. This paper propose a concept of Big Data analytics to support learning process in organization especially healthcare service provider. In Indonesia, a big corporate, like PT. Telkom Indonesia.Tbk, commonly has internal healthcare provider which organize healthcare services for all employees, pensions, and their families. With better learning process, it is expected can improve the services and claim-cost. This paper take a case study from Yakes Telkom as internal healthcare provider of Telkom. 1heor|nca| Iramework koowleJqe Moooqemeot Relation between pieces of data can form information. Information that processed further can become knowledge when one realize and understand the pattern relation among data and information and their implication [4] . Knowledge is one of important asset in an organization. Therefore, organization should optimize knowledge to support the development of product, process, or services. Information technology has been used for supporting knowledge management foi decades. Hayes (2O11) dehned lvo ioIes of IT in knovIedge nanagenenl, inleiaclive and integrative application. Integrative applications take the form of structured databases that allow employees to store and retrieve information on past projects, expert hndeis, eIeclionic luIIelin loaids lhiough lo lesl piaclice iepoils and voiking papeis. Interactive applications take the form of email, desktop conferencing, and discussion forums allowing for interactions with other staff and the garnering of their views and experiences regardless of physical location. Knowledge management and learning organization are two terms that related each olhei. Snilh and LyIes (2O11) dehned lhe dislinclion lelveen Ieaining and knowledge: knowledge being the stuff (or content) that the organization possesses, and learning being the process whereby it acquires this stuff. Therefore, information technology used in knowledge management can also be usefull for supporting learning organization. | 585 now coo 8lq uoto 5oppott leotoloq ltocess? A cose 5toJy lo Otqoolzouoo lotetool neoltbcote ltovlJet leotoloq Otqoolzouoo Ielei Senge (199O) dehned Ieaining oiganizalions as organizations where people continually expand their capacity to create the results they truly desire, where new and expansive pa||crns cf |nin|ing arc nur|urcd, uncrc cc||cc|itc aspira|icn is sc| frcc, uncrc pccp|c ccn|inua||q learning to see the whole together (Jashpara, 2004). Almost same with Senge, Pedler, uigoyne, and oydeII (1991) dehne lhe Ieaining oiganizalion as an organization that faci|i|a|cs |nc |carning cf a|| cf i|s ncnocrs and ccn|inucus|q |ransfcrns i|sc|f in crdcr |c ncc| its strategic goals (Yang, 2004). While Garvin (1993) said, a learning organization is an crganiza|icn s|i||cd a| crca|ing, acquiring and |ransfcrring |ncu|cdgc, and a| ncdifqing i|s ocnaticr |c rccc| ncu |ncu|cdgc and insign| (VassaIou, 2OO1). Iion lhose dehnilions, ve conclude that in a learning orgnization, employees are encouraged and facilitated to upgrade their knowledges and skills by improve their learning capacity in order to meet organization strategic goals. Theie aie hve dicipIines lo inpIenenl Ieaining oiganizalion accoiding lo Ielei Senge (Senge, 2004): 1. System thinking. A framework for seeing interrelationships rather than things, for seeing patterns of change rather than static snapshots. System thinking is a discipline for seing wholes. 2. Personal mastery. It is the of personal growth and learning. People with high levels of personal mastery are continually expanding their ability to create the results in life they truly seek. Organizations learn only through individuals who learn. 3. Mental model. Assumptions, generalizations, or even pictures or images that inuence hov peopIe undeisland lhe voiId and hov lhey lake aclion. Managing mental models promises to be a major breakthrough for building learning organizations. 4. Building shared vision. A vision that many people are truly commited to, because it ieecls lheii ovn peisonaI vision. Shaied vision is vilaI foi lhe Ieaining oiganizalion because it provides the focus and energy for learning. 5. Team learning. When teams are truly learning, not only are they producing extraordinary results but the individual members are growing more rapidly than could have occured otherwise. esides hve dicipIines fion Senge, VassaIou (2OO1) aIso dehned hve piincipIes of learning organization in order the process to succeed: 1. Mission and vision. A widely shared and understood mission enables staff at all levels to develop their skills and capabilities, take reponsibilities and contribute to organizational performance 2. Leadership. Empowers employees, encourages an experimenting culture, rewards learning, supports innovative suggestions and frequently generates learning opportunities on-the-job 3. Transfer of Knowledge. Learning form past failures makes knowledge explicit and enables its transfer from individual to organizational level 586 | ISCLO 2013 | The 1 st lnLernauonal Semlnar & Conference on Learnlng Crganlzauon roceedlngs 4. Teamwork and co-operation. Diversity of team members knowledge and backgrounds stimulates dialogue, brainstorming and team problem solving 5. Experimenting culture. Sets aside resources for employees to enagage in creative pet projects, develops rewarding mechanisms for those that excel in this area and tolerates errors. Caivin (1993) in }ashpaia (2OO4) said lhal Ieaining oiganizalion nodeI has hve main activities: - systematic problem solving, - experimentation with new approaches, - learning from their own experience and past history, - learning from the experiences and best practices of others, and - liansfeiiing knovIedge quickIy and efhcienlIy lhioughoul lhe oiganizalion 8lq uoto Aoolyucs a. ig Dala dehnilion Big data refers to datasets whose size is beyond the ability of typical database software tools to capture, store, manage, and analyze (McKinsey, 2011). Every oiganizalion nov use digilaI dala. Theie aie hve appIicalIe vays lo Ieveiage lig data that offer transformational potential to create value an have implications for how organizations will have to be designed, organized, and managed. 1. Creating tansparency. Making big data more easily accessible to relevant stakeholders in a timely manner. 2. Enabling experimentation to discover needs, expose variability, and improve performace. Organizations can collect more accurate and detailed performance data (in real or near real time) on everything as they create and store more transactional data in digital form. 3. Segmenting populations to customize actions. Big data allows organizations to cieale highIy specihc segnenlalions and lo laiIoi pioducls and seivices pieciseIy to meet those needs. 4. Replacing/supporting human decision making with automated algorithms. In some cases, decisions will not necessarily be automated but augmanted by analyzing huge, entire datasets using big data techniques and technologies. 5. Innovating new business models, products, and services. Big data enables companies to create new products and services, enhance existing ones, and invent entirely new business models. Big Data analytics is developed from data analytics dicipline which has been used for a long time ago for helping decision making in organization. Data analytics was used structured data with ETL (Extract, Transform, and Load) process. Some its popular applications are business intelligence, data mining, and other OLAP (Online Analytical Process) systems. There are four Vs that characterize Big Data (Sathi, 2012): | S87 now coo 8lq uoto 5oppott leotoloq ltocess? A cose 5toJy lo Otqoolzouoo lotetool neoltbcote ltovlJet 1. Volume. With automation and digitalize data, organizations now have a huge amount of data that come from within the corporation and outside the organization. 2. Velocity. There two aspects of velocity, throuhgput of data (data moving in the pipes) and latency (using data in motion) 3. Variety. The source data includes unstructured text, sound, and video in addition to structured data. 4. Veracity. Veracity represents both the credibility of the data source as well as the suitability of the data for the target audience.
b. Big Data Application in Healthcare In heaIlhcaie indusliies, incieasing use of nuIlinedia has conliiluled signihcanlIy to the growth of big data. Image data in the form of X-rays, CT and other scans dominate data storage volumes in healthcare. While a singe page of records can total a kilobyte, a single image can require 20 tp 200 megabutes or more to store (McKinsey, 2011). Healthcare organization usually has multiple stakeholders, including pharmaceutical and medical products industries, providers, insurance agencies and patients. Each generates pools of data, but they have typically remained unconnected from each olhei. McKinsey CIolaI inslilule dehne foui dislincl lig dala pooIs exisl in lhe US health care domain; pharmaceutical R&D data, clinical data, activity (claims) and cost data, and patient behavior and sentiment data. Using big data analysis from lhal dala pooIs couId inciease efhciencies, inpioved liealnenl effeclivenss, and productivity enhancement (McKinsey, 2011). According to McKinsey Global Institute (2011) in healthcare industry, Big Data could be used to: 1. Comparative effectiveness research 2. Clinical decision support systems 3. Transparency about medical data 4. Remote patient monitoring 5. Advanced anaIylics appIied lo palienl piohIes 6. Automated payment systems 7. Health economics and outcomes research and performance-based pricing plans 8. Creating new business models: Online platforms and communities 9. And supporting public health program. Methodo|ogy This research uses qualitative method and exploratory approach. Its a case study of an internal organization of a healthcare provider. Primary data is from interview with head of service division of Yakes-Telkom. Secondary data consists of internal documents and internet references. The data was analyze by comparing study with another cases in US healthcase services to formulate a conceptual strategies of learning process using Big 588 | ISCLO 2013 | The 1 st lnLernauonal Semlnar & Conference on Learnlng Crganlzauon roceedlngs Data in the case study object. Case Study PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia, Tbk (Telkom) is one of the biggest state-owned enterprise in telecommunication industry. Since 1965, healthcare services had given for aII enpIoyees and lheii faniIies as civiI ofhceis in Indonesia. If lhey veie sick, lhey couId get restitution for they health care fee from the government through their institution. UnliI 1998, heaIlh caie nanagenenl foi enpIoyees and pensions and lheii faniIies vas nanaged ly heaIlh unil in IT. TeIkon. Since ApiiI 1sl, 1998 Yayasan Kesehalan Iegavai Telkom (Yakes-Telkom) was founded as separated entity from Telkom, following the policy to become go public company. Since 2000, all health care management, in regional devision, support devision, and some subsidiaries of Telkom have been managed byYakes-Telkom. Yakes-Telkom has mission to becoming the best healthcare service provider in Indonesia. To support its mission, Yakes-Telkom has establishes some strategies and policies. Some of them, that related to this paper, are increasing healthcare services and controlling expenditures. Until mid-year 2013, Yakes-Telkom has 403 employees, consits of medical and non-medical staff, spread in 950 clinics operated in 7 regions in Indonesia. Healthcare services provided inlcuding medical laboratorium, pharmacy, optic, general check-up, and some specialist. Yakes also has six internal laboratoriums under Rasapala (Yakes subsidiaries) management. Yakes-Telkom has around 120.000 members from Telkom Group (including employees, pensions and their families) and around 30.000 members from Telkom subsidiaries. Yakes-Telkom has online medical record system that integrate all medical data of Yakes members. The system record patients personal data, treatment duration, healthcare expenditures, hospitality history, and drugs records. With this system, patients can get treatment from any clinic with any doctor without worry about their medical data. All data from internal clinic (organized by Yakes) will be uploaded to medical record system by each doctors. If they take medical treatment from partner hospital, data will be input by staff when employees or pensions ask for restitutions. They should give proof of payment and medical resume from the partner hospital. From all clinics, it could reach 2560 transactions a day. To reach it goals, Yakes-Telkom has a lot of programs devided in preventive, currative, and rehabilitative programs. Preventive programs consist of health club, healthiest family award, health-life paradigm, annual medical check-up, monthly monitoring (for employees and pensions grouped as unhealthy condition). Currative programs including medical treatment in clinic and hospital. Another program is establishing Telkoms dugs list or Daftar Obat Telkom (DOT) for employees and pensions of Telkom. DOT is list of drugs and pharmacy materials that have selected by medical proof, save and efective. This program has objectives for drug use standardization, quaIily conlioI, efhciency of cIain-cosl, and diug use noniloiing. | 589 now coo 8lq uoto 5oppott leotoloq ltocess? A cose 5toJy lo Otqoolzouoo lotetool neoltbcote ltovlJet Beside programs for healthcare services, Yakes also has programs to increase cosl efhciency. Sone piogians aie nedicaI liealnenl slandaidizalion, ieducing cIain cost by maximizing factory discount, reward and punishment, decreasing margin of pharmacy and hospital, drugs formulation, and regulation of healthcare facility. D|scuss|on]Interpertanon of Data Yakes-Telkom has a large number of data that can be optimized to improve its piocesses oi seivices. CeneiaIIy, lhe dala can le cIassihed in lhiee najoi pooIs. They aie clinical data, patients behavior data, and activity and cost data. Each data pools consists of some data sets that come from different elements. These are the detail of data pools that can be formed by Yakes. 1. Clinical data. Example datasets: electronic medical record, medical image, drugs list standard Sources: Yakes clinics, partner hospitals 2. Patients behavior data Example datasets: exercise data, patients behavior and preferences Source: Patients 3. Activity and cost data Example datasets: utilization of care, cost estimation Sources: Yakes clinics, partner hospitals Figure 1. Rcccncnda|icn cf 8ig Da|a Pcc|s fcr Ya|cs Tc||cn With those data pools, Yakes can implement some Big Data solution are to do improvement for services and processes. These are some potential improvement from 590 | ISCLO 2013 | The 1 st lnLernauonal Semlnar & Conference on Learnlng Crganlzauon roceedlngs big data analytics implementation, adopted from Mc Kinsey Global Institute analysis (McKinsey, 2011). 1. Comparative effectiveness research. Deleinining vhich liealnenls viII voik lesl foi specihc palienls ly anaIyzing comprehensive patient and outcome data to compare the effectiveness of various interventions. This solution can be supported by clinical data and patients behavior data 2. Clinical decision support systems. DepIoying cIinicaI decision suppoil syslens foi enhancing lhe efhciency and quaIily of operations. This solution can be supported by clinical data and activity and cost data. 3. Transparency about medical data. The goal is to identify and analyze sources of variability and waste in clinical processes and then optimize processes. This can be supported by clinical data and activity and cost data. 4. Remote patient monitoring. Collecting data from remote patient monitoring for chronically ill patients and analyzing the resulting data to monitor adherence (determining if patients are actually doing what was prescribed) and to improve future drug and treatment options. This can be supported by patients behavior data. 5. Advanced anaIylics appIied lo palienl piohIes. AppIying advanced anaIylics lo palienl piohIes (e.g., segnenlalion and piediclive nodeIing) lo idenlify individuaIs vho vouId lenehl fion pioaclive caie oi IifeslyIe changes. This can be supported by clinical data and patients behavior data. 6. Automated pricing systems. Implementing automated systems for fraud detection and checking the accuracy and consistency of patients claims. This can be supported by activity and cost data. 7. Online platforms and communities. Forum for individuals can share their experience as patients in the system, or a forum for physicians to share their medical insights. This can be supported by patients behavior data This table below shows how those big data solution could be used in each learning process. Learn|ng rocesss 8|g Data So|ut|on 1 ComparaLlve effecLlveness research v v v 2 Cllnlcal declslon supporL sysLem v v 3 1ransparency abouL medlcal daLa v v v 4 8emoLe paLlenL monlLorlng v 5 Advanced analyLlcs applled Lo paLlenLs proflles v 6 AuLomaLed prlclng sysLem v 7 Cnllne plaLform and communlLles v v No Systemat|c prob|em so|v|ng exper|ment at|on |earn|ng from own exper|ences |earn|ng from others transferr|ng know|edge eff|c|ent|y | 591 now coo 8lq uoto 5oppott leotoloq ltocess? A cose 5toJy lo Otqoolzouoo lotetool neoltbcote ltovlJet Table 1. Mapping of Big Data Solution and Learning Process Next step, we mapped Big Data Solutions above (from Tabel 1) to Yakes Progams. Nunleis in ig Dala SoIulions heId shov lhal lhose soIulions suppoil oi le suppoiled by related programs. Increasing healthcare services Controlling expenditures health club V 4, 7 health family awards V 4, 7 health-life paradigm V 4, 7 annual medical check-up V 1, 5 monthly monitoring V 4, 5 currative treatment V 1, 2, 3 drug lists (DOT) V V 1, 2, 6 medical treatment standardization V V 2, 3 reducing claimcost V 6 reward and punishment V V 2 decreasing margin of pharmacy & hospital V 6 drugs formulation standard V 2, 6 regulation of healthcare facility V 2 Strateg|es Big Data Solution(s) Yakes' Programs Tabel 2. Mapping cf 8ig Da|a Sc|u|icn and Ya|cs Prcgrans Conc|us|on and kecommendanon ig dala anaIylics can le used lo inpiove hve nain acliviles in Ieaining piocesses. In case of Yakes Telkom, those solution can also help Yakes programs to increase healthcare services and control expenditures. This research still has many weakneasses. For further research, we recommend to add more data and more detail discussion about big data solutions that could be implemented in organization. keferences [1 ] Hayes, Niall. 2011. Information Technology and Possibilities for Knowledge Sharing. Handbook of Organizational Learning & Knowledge Management, Second Edition. United Kingdom. John Willey & Sons. [2] Jashpara, Ashok. 2004. Knowledge Management, An integrated Approach. Prentice Hall. Pearson Education [3] Keidrowski, P.Jay. 2006. Quantitative assessment of a Senge learning organization inleivenlion. The Leaining Oiganizalion VoI.13 No.4, 2OO6 pp. 369-383. LneiaId Group Publishing Limited. [4] McAfee, Andrew and Erik Brynjolfsson. 2012. Big Data: The Management Revolution. Harvard Business Review. October 2012. [5] McKinsey Global Institue. 2011. Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competitiion, and productivity. McKinsey & Company. [6] Sathi, Arvind. 2012. Big Data Analytics. Disruptive Technologies for Changing the 592 | ISCLO 2013 | The 1 st lnLernauonal Semlnar & Conference on Learnlng Crganlzauon roceedlngs Game. MC Press Online, LLC [7] Senge, Peter M.. 2004. Fifth Dicipline: The Art & practice of Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday. |8j Snilh, Maik Lasleily and Maijoiie A. LyIes. 2O11. The LvoIving IieId of OiganizalionaI Learning and Knowledge Management. Handbook of Organizational Learning & Knowledge Management, Second Edition. United Kingdom. John Willey & Sons. |9j Uiiaile }i., IiIenon A. 2OO8. Inlioduclion lo KnovIedge Managenenl. ASLAN Foundation. Jakarta [10] Vassalou, Leda. 2001. The learning organization in health-care services: theory and practice. Journal of European Industrial Training. MCB university Press [ISSN 0309-0590] [11] Wahyono, Teguh. 2013. Pendirian dan Pengelolaan Yayasan Kesehatan Pegawai Telkom. Yakes-Telkom. [12] Yang, baiyin., Watkins, E. KAren, Marsick, Victoria J.2004. Construct of the Learning Organization: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation. Human Resource Development Quarterly, vol. 15, no. 1, Spring 2004. Wiley Periodicals, Inc