0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
50 vues3 pages
This document summarizes two leadership theories: servant leadership theory and strengths-based leadership theory. Servant leadership theory argues that the most effective leaders serve their followers and focus on collaboration, trust and ethics. Strengths-based leadership theory maintains that people and organizations are most productive when they leverage strengths rather than fix weaknesses. Both theories emphasize investing in followers, though servant leadership may focus too much on followers at the expense of organizational needs.
This document summarizes two leadership theories: servant leadership theory and strengths-based leadership theory. Servant leadership theory argues that the most effective leaders serve their followers and focus on collaboration, trust and ethics. Strengths-based leadership theory maintains that people and organizations are most productive when they leverage strengths rather than fix weaknesses. Both theories emphasize investing in followers, though servant leadership may focus too much on followers at the expense of organizational needs.
This document summarizes two leadership theories: servant leadership theory and strengths-based leadership theory. Servant leadership theory argues that the most effective leaders serve their followers and focus on collaboration, trust and ethics. Strengths-based leadership theory maintains that people and organizations are most productive when they leverage strengths rather than fix weaknesses. Both theories emphasize investing in followers, though servant leadership may focus too much on followers at the expense of organizational needs.
Assignment #2 SUBMITTED BY Asra farooq 10012720-059 Bilal Ahmad 10012720-063 Nayab Ahsan 10012720-065 Umair Majeed 10012720-083 Naveed Khan 10012720-094
Master in Business Administration (Faculty of Management & Administrative Sciences) University of Gujrat
Topic: leadership theories in practice
Understanding various leadership theories and knowing when to use each is critical. Theory is important, because theories are constructed and tested by examining not just the successes but also the failures. Failures are incredibly valuable for the lessons they hold, especially when they properly balance successes. In our book we deeply studied various theories of leadership which are as follows: Trait Skills behavioral Contingency Situational Path-goal Leader-member exchange But there are few more ways through which leadership can be done. David Burkus in his book the portable guide to leading organizations explained two new theories through which people can lead effectively. They are known as: Servant leadership theory Strengths based leadership theory Servant leadership theory: Servant Leadership is a recent theory of leadership that argues that the most effective leaders are servants of their people. Servant leaders get results for their organization through whole-hearted attention to their followers and followers needs. Unlike many approaches to leadership, which offer suggestions on how top-level leaders can influence and motivate those further down the hierarchy, servant leaders puts its emphasis on collaboration, trust, empathy and ethics. The leader should be a servant first, leading from a desire to better serve others and not to attain more power. The assumption is that if leaders focus on the needs and desires of followers, follower will reciprocate through increased teamwork, deeper engagement and better performance. Greenleaf first presented the theory in a 1970 essay, The Servant as Leader. However, numerous others theorists have contributed to our understanding of servant leadership. One theorist, Larry Spears, outlined ten characteristics of servant leaders by analyzing the writings of Greenleaf. These ten characteristics are listening, empathy, healing, awareness, persuasion, conceptualization, foresight, stewardship, commitment to the growth of others, and building community. Servant leadership is one of the more popular theories of leadership, especially among Christian leaders who vigorously cite Jesus as the penultimate example of servant leadership. However, its effectiveness in organizations is still being debated. Many researchers and theorists argue that servant leaders can become so focus on the needs of their followers, that the needs of the organization suffer as a result. In any case, Servant leadership theory has a place within the spectrum of leadership theory, as it represents the strongest emphasis on followers of any theory. Strengths based leadership: Strengths-Based Leadership Theory (also known as Strengths-Based Organizational Management or SBOM) is a method of maximizing the efficiency, productivity, and success of an organization by focusing on and continuously developing the strengths of organizational resources, such as computer systems, tools, and people. At the core of the strengths-based leadership is the underlying belief that people have several times more potential for growth building on their strengths rather than fixing their weaknesses. A strength is defined as the ability to exhibit near-perfect performance consistently in a given activity. Strengths-based organizations dont ignore weaknesses, but rather, focuses on building talents and minimizing the negative effects of weaknesses. Strengths-based leaders are always investing in their strengths and the strengths of individuals on their team. Rath and Conchie put forth three tenants of Strengths-based leadership: (1) Effective leaders invest in their followers strengths, (2) Effective leaders build well-rounded teams out of followers who are not and (3) Effective leaders understand the needs of followers. Strengths-based leadership theory is supported by over 30 years of research from the Gallup Organization and others. Recent research has found that when leading teams, strengths-based leadership causes individual team member efficacy to increase, but collective team efficacy to decrease, suggesting that it is not an optimal method for leading teams where cohesion is necessary.